Draft Manning River Catchment and Estuary and Catchment Management Program 2021-2031 - Main document

Page 102

6.13 Sewerage and Septic System Pathogens MidCoast Council operates eight Sewerage Treatment Plants (STPs) in the Manning catchment, at Gloucester, Wingham, Dawson wetlands (Brimbin), Harrington, Manning Point, Old Bar, Coopernook and Lansdowne. Most of the region is unsewered, relying on on-site sewage management (OSSM) systems including traditional septic systems and pump-to-sewer systems. MidCoast Council (MCC) has the responsibility to ensure that all onsite sewage management systems are approved, installed and managed so that they comply with the requirements under the Local Government Act 1993 and do not pose a risk to the environment or public health. Failing systems or mismanagement of OSSMs present a pathogen risk to groundwater and receiving waters, with consequent health risks for the oyster industry, potable water and recreation. 59 Sewerage and STP run-off have been found to affect water quality in the Manning, particularly during high rainfall events. 60 While the highest faecal input comes from livestock, human pathogens have the highest safety risk. Pathogens (faecal coliforms and E. coli) from sewerage and septic systems are an issue for the local oyster industry, particularly at Pelican Bay, Scotts Creek and the South Channel. In the Manning oyster fishery, rainfall exceeding 25mm in 24 hours is a trigger for closure of harvest areas due to the potential decrease in salinity and increase in faecal coliforms that can result from significant rainfall stormwater run-off. 6162 Depuration requirements add time and cost to the harvest-to-market process. Critical risk on-site sewage management systems for the oyster industry are located within 100 meters of the shoreline and adjacent to a shellfish harvest area. 63 Pathogens from human sources pose a risk to raw water quality for potable water extracted from the Manning catchment at Barrington and Bootawa. MidCoast Council’s water services team (formerly MidCoast Water) held drinking water risk workshops in May 2016 and July 2020, both of which identified bacteria, viruses and protozoa as high to extreme risk for raw untreated water 64. Water Treatment Plant and operational policies (e.g. selective extraction from the river) produce safe drinking water (L. Andersons pers. comm. Aug. 2020). Pathogens present a hazard for passive and secondary recreation, with popular activities including swimming, boating and kayaking. This is rarely an issue. After the 1-in100-year flood in March 2021, water quality testing by the Environment Protection Authority gave the all-clear for swimming in the Manning and Dawson Rivers less than two weeks after the flood. Stakeholders include: NSW Food Authority, MCC Water Services, MCC Environmental Health and Natural Systems teams, Environment Protection Authority (EPA), Department of Primary Industries - Fisheries, oyster farmers, MCC Water Services (rate payers, water

(Swanson, 2019) (Williams, 1987) 61 (Bullock,, 2018) 62 (Parsons, 2010) 63 NSW Fisheries Spatial Data Portal - https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/fishing/spatial-data-portal 64 (Bligh Tanner, 2016) 59 60

Manning River ECMP Exhibition Draft V2 June 2021

Page 90


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Figure 39 MidCoast Council Organisational Structure

4min
pages 194-196

Appendix 6: MCC land-use strategies aligned to the CM SEPP objectives

8min
pages 186-192

Implementation Streams

10min
pages 197-203

Appendix 2: The Public Participation Spectrum

0
page 167

13. Bibliography

4min
pages 162-164

12. Proposed amendments to the CM SEPP

3min
pages 160-161

11.3 The Manning River ECMP Research Program

3min
pages 158-159

11.1 MERI for the Manning River, Estuary and Catchment

4min
pages 148-151

7. Management Actions

4min
pages 106-108

6.15 Systems thinking: the interaction between issues

1min
page 105

10. Coastal Zone Emergency Sub-Plan

1min
page 146

6.13 Sewerage and Septic System Pathogens

2min
page 102

Figure 33: The Manning River floodplain, 20 March 2021

5min
pages 98-101

Figure 32: Cattle on the riverbank is a common sight

10min
pages 91-97

Table 4: Key impacts associated with water pollution from diffuse-source runoff

1min
page 90

Figure 25: Estuary with negative impacts vs well-managed estuary

1min
pages 78-79

Figure 27: Cattai Wetlands

1min
pages 84-85

Figure 26: Conceptual diagram of the Greenhouse Effect

6min
pages 80-83

Figure 24: The relationship between activities, stressors and ecological impacts

0
page 76

Figure 22: Risk ratings for sediment and nutrient loading in drainage units

2min
pages 70-71

Table 2: Subcatchments posing the highest risk to ecological and community values

1min
page 69

Figure 21: Stock intensity in the catchment

1min
page 65

Figure 18: Manning River TN and TP readings from 2015-18

0
page 62

Figure 17: The sampling location for water quality data

1min
page 61

Figure 9: The Integrated Planning and Reporting Framework

2min
pages 31-32

Figure 15: National Parks make up18.5% of the Manning catchment

2min
pages 58-59

Figure 14: Program Logic Model

9min
pages 51-57

Figure 12: Values our community ascribed to each subcatchment

10min
pages 41-49

Figure 11: The consultation program

2min
pages 38-40

Figure 16: Water quality monitoring sites in the estuary

1min
page 60

Figure 10: Option for the Manning River ECMP Governance Structure

7min
pages 33-37

Figure 7: The five stages of a Coastal Management Program

2min
pages 26-29
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.