Draft Manning River Catchment and Estuary and Catchment Management Program 2021-2031 - Main document

Page 148

11.1 MERI for the Manning River, Estuary and Catchment MidCoast Council will implement a broadscale environmental monitoring, evaluation, reporting and improvement (MERI) program to support the management objectives of the ECMP. The MERI Program will provide a high-level assessment of environmental quality to ensure the values in Section 2 are maintained across the Manning River Estuary and Catchment. Implementing the MERI Program will assist Council and our stakeholders to establish a baseline of data characterising water quality including ecological health. Continued long-term monitoring will enable us to detect changes (positive or negative) in water quality over time. Analysing the data will aid decision-making and adaptive management, helping us to improve the program and achieve our objectives. The MERI Program constitutes the science program defined in the CMP Program Logic Model (see Section 3.4). 11.1.1 Principles The MERI Plan adopts the following Principles: •

Uses SMART Objectives – Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Timebound.

Relies on an agreed program logic – robust methodology to ensure outcomes can be effectively measured.

Uses Best Practice - current best practice and scientific knowledge and multiple (environmental indicator) lines of evidence.

Adopts a risk-based approach – assists MidCoast Council to prioritise monitoring of ecological responses and stressors that pose the highest risk to ecological health.

Emphasises collaboration – builds on existing programs to improve efficiency and reduce duplication in effort.

Transparent reporting – offers open access to information.

Adaptive Management – adopts a systematic approach to improving natural resource management by learning from management outcomes and making changes to improve the ecological response and reduce stressors.

Values cultural knowledge – recognises the importance of cultural knowledge holders in increasing understanding of the condition and health of the Manning River Estuary and Catchment and the influence environmental change may have on physical and non-physical elements of cultural heritage.

Values local knowledge – recognises the value of local knowledge in understanding and interpreting scientific results about the heath and condition of the Manning River Estuary and Catchment.

Values citizen science – recognises the role of citizen science programs in filling knowledge gaps and increasing understanding of the condition and health of the Manning River Estuary and Catchment.

Manning River ECMP Exhibition Draft V2 June 2021

Page 136


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Figure 39 MidCoast Council Organisational Structure

4min
pages 194-196

Appendix 6: MCC land-use strategies aligned to the CM SEPP objectives

8min
pages 186-192

Implementation Streams

10min
pages 197-203

Appendix 2: The Public Participation Spectrum

0
page 167

13. Bibliography

4min
pages 162-164

12. Proposed amendments to the CM SEPP

3min
pages 160-161

11.3 The Manning River ECMP Research Program

3min
pages 158-159

11.1 MERI for the Manning River, Estuary and Catchment

4min
pages 148-151

7. Management Actions

4min
pages 106-108

6.15 Systems thinking: the interaction between issues

1min
page 105

10. Coastal Zone Emergency Sub-Plan

1min
page 146

6.13 Sewerage and Septic System Pathogens

2min
page 102

Figure 33: The Manning River floodplain, 20 March 2021

5min
pages 98-101

Figure 32: Cattle on the riverbank is a common sight

10min
pages 91-97

Table 4: Key impacts associated with water pollution from diffuse-source runoff

1min
page 90

Figure 25: Estuary with negative impacts vs well-managed estuary

1min
pages 78-79

Figure 27: Cattai Wetlands

1min
pages 84-85

Figure 26: Conceptual diagram of the Greenhouse Effect

6min
pages 80-83

Figure 24: The relationship between activities, stressors and ecological impacts

0
page 76

Figure 22: Risk ratings for sediment and nutrient loading in drainage units

2min
pages 70-71

Table 2: Subcatchments posing the highest risk to ecological and community values

1min
page 69

Figure 21: Stock intensity in the catchment

1min
page 65

Figure 18: Manning River TN and TP readings from 2015-18

0
page 62

Figure 17: The sampling location for water quality data

1min
page 61

Figure 9: The Integrated Planning and Reporting Framework

2min
pages 31-32

Figure 15: National Parks make up18.5% of the Manning catchment

2min
pages 58-59

Figure 14: Program Logic Model

9min
pages 51-57

Figure 12: Values our community ascribed to each subcatchment

10min
pages 41-49

Figure 11: The consultation program

2min
pages 38-40

Figure 16: Water quality monitoring sites in the estuary

1min
page 60

Figure 10: Option for the Manning River ECMP Governance Structure

7min
pages 33-37

Figure 7: The five stages of a Coastal Management Program

2min
pages 26-29
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.