Draft Manning River Catchment and Estuary and Catchment Management Program 2021-2031 - Main document

Page 197

The guideline indicates that the following won’t be funded: •

Maintenance of funded projects.

Projects eligible for funding under natural disaster relief.

Amenity works (car parking, footpaths, seating, shelters and lighting etc).

Projects within freshwater environments unless they are shown to significantly improve estuary health.

Variations exceeding +30% of the original amount requested.

Coast and Estuary Planning Stream These grants effectively cover the actions which lead to the implementation ‘on-the-ground’ works that would be funded under the various implementation funding streams discussed below. These include the preparation of CMPs and studies that are needed to develop a CMP. Investigations and designs for works recommended in a CMP are also covered, along with cost benefit / distributional analyses to support such works. A strict read of the most recent guidelines for grants indicates that the planning stream is only valid for activities which are needed to develop a CMP, transition from a CZMP to a CMP, or to undertake investigations, designs and cost-benefit analyses for infrastructure works recommended in a certified CMP. In other words, general planning and investigation required for mapping, additional processes investigation or other supporting studies to fill data gaps or help formulate actions do not seem to be covered by either the Planning Stream or the Implementation Stream (see next section). Applications for funding under the Planning Stream are presently open until 30 June 2021. Implementation Streams For the coastal vulnerability area, activities that can be demonstrated to reduce the threat from coastal hazards can be funded. These include beach nourishment; dune restoration works and seawalls. For the coastal wetlands and littoral rainforests area, actions indicated as being suitable for funding include the management of weeds and invasive animals, trails and accessways, works to reduce exposure to coastal erosion, replanting and stabilising vegetation and habitat restoration/conservation. For the coastal environment area, actions indicated as being suitable for funding include community education, access management, environmentally beneficial dredging, monitoring (linked with actions to improve ecosystem health), the protection of Aboriginal heritage, management of stormwater quality (where demonstrated to be beneficial to the receiving environment), revegetation and weed management, sediment and erosion control actions. Activities in the upper catchment, where beneficial to estuarine health may also be funded. For the coastal use area, actions indicated as being suitable for funding include community education, the management of public access, actions to protect Aboriginal heritage, stormwater management, revegetation and weed management and monitoring.

Manning River ECMP Exhibition Draft V2 June 2021

Page 185


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Figure 39 MidCoast Council Organisational Structure

4min
pages 194-196

Appendix 6: MCC land-use strategies aligned to the CM SEPP objectives

8min
pages 186-192

Implementation Streams

10min
pages 197-203

Appendix 2: The Public Participation Spectrum

0
page 167

13. Bibliography

4min
pages 162-164

12. Proposed amendments to the CM SEPP

3min
pages 160-161

11.3 The Manning River ECMP Research Program

3min
pages 158-159

11.1 MERI for the Manning River, Estuary and Catchment

4min
pages 148-151

7. Management Actions

4min
pages 106-108

6.15 Systems thinking: the interaction between issues

1min
page 105

10. Coastal Zone Emergency Sub-Plan

1min
page 146

6.13 Sewerage and Septic System Pathogens

2min
page 102

Figure 33: The Manning River floodplain, 20 March 2021

5min
pages 98-101

Figure 32: Cattle on the riverbank is a common sight

10min
pages 91-97

Table 4: Key impacts associated with water pollution from diffuse-source runoff

1min
page 90

Figure 25: Estuary with negative impacts vs well-managed estuary

1min
pages 78-79

Figure 27: Cattai Wetlands

1min
pages 84-85

Figure 26: Conceptual diagram of the Greenhouse Effect

6min
pages 80-83

Figure 24: The relationship between activities, stressors and ecological impacts

0
page 76

Figure 22: Risk ratings for sediment and nutrient loading in drainage units

2min
pages 70-71

Table 2: Subcatchments posing the highest risk to ecological and community values

1min
page 69

Figure 21: Stock intensity in the catchment

1min
page 65

Figure 18: Manning River TN and TP readings from 2015-18

0
page 62

Figure 17: The sampling location for water quality data

1min
page 61

Figure 9: The Integrated Planning and Reporting Framework

2min
pages 31-32

Figure 15: National Parks make up18.5% of the Manning catchment

2min
pages 58-59

Figure 14: Program Logic Model

9min
pages 51-57

Figure 12: Values our community ascribed to each subcatchment

10min
pages 41-49

Figure 11: The consultation program

2min
pages 38-40

Figure 16: Water quality monitoring sites in the estuary

1min
page 60

Figure 10: Option for the Manning River ECMP Governance Structure

7min
pages 33-37

Figure 7: The five stages of a Coastal Management Program

2min
pages 26-29
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.