scientific journal of the modern education & research institute • The Kingdom of Belgium
REFLECTION OF A SUCCESSFUL DIALOGUE IN THE PRESS Israil Shukhrat Mukhtar ugli, Professor (muzaf17@gmail.com) Israil Mukaddas Irgashevna, Doctor of philosophy (Philology), Professor (israil19mukaddas@gmail.com) Uzbek State University of World Languages, Uzbekistan
Abstract As the researchers note, the main important principle of building an interview is a dialogue. Dialogue is a multi-faceted term, used both to denote a communicative type of speech, and to denote one of the types of interviews (interview-dialogue). Dialogue as a communicative type of speech was formed in antiquity, it is, along with the monologue, the basic concept and the basis for the construction of Russian speech. The problem of distinguishing between dialogue and monologue has become one of the main problems in linguistics of the XX century. The resolution of this issue was handled by L. P. Yakubinsky, L. V. Shcherba, T. G. Vinokur, from modern researchers-E. V. Krasilnikova, E. N. Shiryaev and others. The article is devoted to the study of the interview genre as one of the leading information genres of journalism at the beginning of the XXI century, to identify the stylistic features of interviews, the peculiarities of the functioning of linguistic-stylistic units within the interview, to analyze scientific research on this topic. Keywords: dialogue, dialogical unity, interview, interview-dialogue, interview-monologue, linguistic and stylistic features, journalistic style, sociolinguistic factors, journalist’s remark, press language.
Dialogue is a part of colloquial speech (in contrast to the monologue that underlies the literary language), it consists of a chain of replicas [12, p. 115]. The concatenation of replicas, in which the second replica is based on the first one in its structure, grammatically depends on it, is called a dialogic unity and is the main unit of the dialogue [10, p. 84]. However, the presence of a chain of replicas cannot be perceived as an unconditional marker of the dialogue [12, p. 274], there is no strict boundary between a monologue and a dialogue, as evidenced, for example, by the frequent inclusion of extensive monologic statements of communication subjects in the dialogue: «Replicas turn into logically expanded arguments, polemically sharpen, grow into monologues addressed to the interlocutor, and the entire dialogue becomes a system of dialogically correlated and compared monologues» [19, p. 172]. In the newspaper, the dialogue is reflected primarily in the genre of interviews. Their close fusion is evidenced by the fact that in some works analyzing interviews, the term «dialogue» is used as a synonym for interviews in general [19, p. 197]. However, the genre of the interview can also reflect such communication between the journalist and the interviewee, in which the latter’s answer is, in fact, a monologue – this type of interview is called a monologue interview. The role of a journalist in this case is reduced to the following: the journalist initiates a response-a monologue of the interviewee with his 24
24
