Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022
March 28, 2023
We are pleased to present to you the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) of the County of Montgomery for the fiscal year endedJune 30, 2022, as required by state law. The financial statements and supplemental schedules contained herein have been audited by the independent certified public accounting firmofBrown,Edwards&CompanyL.L.P.,andthatfirm’sunmodifiedopinionisincludedintheFinancial Section of this report. Responsibility for both the accuracy of the data, and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, rests with management. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the enclosed data is accurate in all material respects and is reported in a manner that presents fairly the financial position and results of operations of the various funds and componentunits of the County. All disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain an understanding of the County’s financialactivities have been included.
Management’s discussion and analysis(MD&A) immediately follows theindependent auditor’s report and provides a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis of the basic financial statements. The MD&A complements this letter of transmittal and should be read in conjunction with it.
The financial reporting entity (the government) includes all funds of the primary government (i.e., Montgomery County as legally defined), as well as all of its component units. Component units are legally separate entities for which the primary government is financially accountable.
Blended component units, although legally separate entities, are, in substance, part of the primary government’s operations and are included as part of the primary government. Montgomery County has no blended component units. Discretely presented component units are reported in a separate column in the combined financial statements to emphasize that they are legally separate from the primary government and to differentiate their financial position, results of operations and cash flows from those of the primary government. The Montgomery County Public Service Authority (PSA), which provides water and waste water services, the Montgomery County School Board, which provides education, and the Montgomery County Economic Development Authority, which encourages economic development through incentives such as financing, are reported as discretely presented component units.
Other services provided by the County include law enforcement; fire and rescue services; animal care and adoption services; solid waste collection services; human services programs; libraries; community and economic development programs; recreational activities; and planning and zoning functions. In addition, certain other services are provided through cooperation with neighboring localities such as mental health services, solid waste disposal, emergency communications and tourism. These areas of joint cooperation donotmeettheestablishedcriteriaforinclusioninthereportingentityandthereforeareincludedinfootnote disclosures only.
TheCountyofMontgomerywasestablishedin1776,andislocatedinsouthwesternVirginiaapproximately 30 miles southwest of the City of Roanoke, along the Interstate 81 corridor. The County encompasses approximately 389 square miles and has a population of 102,061 including that of two incorporated towns, Blacksburg and Christiansburg, per the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service population estimates. The 2020 Census indicates Montgomery County’s population increased by 5.6% over the prior decade.
Montgomery County operates under the traditional County form of government. Policymaking and legislative authority are vested in the Board of Supervisors (Board), which consists of seven members elected from within their respective election districts. Each member must be a resident of the district he or she serves. Board members are elected to four year staggered terms. Each year, the Board elects one of its members to serve as Chair. The Board is responsible for passing ordinances, adopting the budget, appointing committees, and hiring the government’s County Administrator and County Attorney. The County Administrator is responsible for carrying out the policies and ordinances of the Board, overseeing the day-to-day operations of the government, and appointing the heads of the County departments. The County also has five elected constitutional officers. The Commissioner of the Revenue, Commonwealth’s Attorney, Treasurer and Sheriff are each elected by County citizens for four year terms. The Clerk of Circuit Court serves an eight year term.
Montgomery County is geographically situated in the New River Valley, which also includes the Counties of Floyd, Giles, and Pulaski and the City of Radford. All of these localities are within reasonable commuting time and distance from Montgomery County and represent the minimum area from which County businesses draw their labor.
Montgomery County’s labor market remains consistent with the state as a whole. The average unemployment rate in the County between July 2021 and June 2022 was 2.6%, which remains historically below the average in the New River Valley. The percentage ranged from a low of 2.0% in December 2021 and April 2022 to a high of 3.3% in July 2021 The unemployment rate for the County over the past 10 years (2012-2021) averaged 4.2%, reaching a high of 5.8% in 2012 and a low of 2.8% in 2019. The pool of available labor has also remained stable for the past decade in Montgomery County, and surrounding New River Valley counties. Average unemployment among New River Valley localities was lower than the statewide rate of 3.9% for calendar year 2021, with Montgomery (3.0%) and Floyd (3.1%) Counties reporting the lowest rates for the year. Giles County, Pulaski County, and the City of Radford averaged 3.9% unemployment during the same period. Employment within Montgomery County represented 55.0% of the total civilian labor force in the New River Valley.
As in prior years, the service industry remained the largest employment sector within the County. The following illustration presents the proportion of individuals in each of the major industry sectors based on averages for the 4th quarter of 2021:
Slight increases in employment were broad based, covering several economic sectors. The total increase in the number ofjobs was 737 across all sectors,resulting in an increase of 1.8% from the previous year. Only three areas experienced declines – the transportation area was down 3.4% while wholesale and retail trade area was down 5.3% and agricultural and mining was down 13.8%, both for the second consecutive year.
The service and manufacturing sectors provide a significant number of jobs in Montgomery County. Two hospitals,CarillionNewRiverValleyMedicalCenterandLewisGaleHospitalatMontgomery,collectively employ over 1,600 employees. The region is a hub for the manufacturing industry with the County’s largest industrial employer, BAE Systems, Inc., employing approximately 1,300 workers through contracts with the federal government to manufacture defense products. Other large companies in the County include Tenneco, formerly known as Federal-Mogul Corporation (automotive bearings), MOOG Components Group (aerospace, transportation, military, and communications components), Rowe Furniture (residential furniture), Wolverine Advanced Materials (automotive gaskets), Backcountry.com (outdoor product distribution), and 1901 Group (software development and management).
The Virginia Tech Corporate Research Center (VTCRC), developed by the Virginia Tech Foundation, is a business/research park that is the catalyst for Montgomery County’s high-tech industry cluster. The 230-acre park includes more than 1.3 million square feet of office and lab space, and is home to over 225 research, technology and support companies, which collectively employ more than 3,500 workers. An expansiononthenorthwestsideoftheparkprovidesenoughlandtoconstruct15buildings,(870,000square feet) in addition to the 36 single and multi-tenant buildings currently on site. The VTCRC anticipates a continued increase in employment, bringing the total number of employees to 5,000. The majority of the tenants located in the VTCRC are research and development-oriented companies operating in the information technology, biotechnology, and advanced materials industries. In the summer of 2022, CMG Leasing opened the Vue, an apartment complex of 207 units adjacent to the VTCRC.
Montgomery County’s second largest industry sector, government, provides 31.3% of the County’s jobs and helps stabilize the local economy during times of recession. This percentage reflects the large number of state workers employed by Virginia Tech, one of the Commonwealth’s largest public universities and the largest employer in the County with approximately 13,000 employees. Approximately 1,600 additional individuals are employed through the Montgomery County Public School System, making education the largest area in the government sector.
Several new commercial and residential developments announced in fiscal year 2020 continued progress in fiscal year 2022. In theTown of Christiansburg,the Marketplace shopping centercontinued redevelopment for new restaurants and retailers, with an expected investment of $53 million. Fiscal year 2022 brought about the opening of several new restaurants and a grocery retailer on the property, and construction of Summit Community Bank. Academy Sports + Outdoors, a national sporting-goods chain recently announced a store to open in the development in 2023. In downtown Blacksburg, a local developer is constructing a $120 million development on property that was previously home to the Blacksburg Middle School. The project will include a total of over 150,000 mixed-use square feet consisting of office space, retail space, a 100-room hotel and 150 residential housing units. In June 2022, the Blacksburg Police Department held a ribbon cutting for their new $16 million, 37,000 square foot, state-of-the-art police facility, the first completed building on the former middle school property, and construction continued on a parking garage that will serve the businesses at the front of the property.
In 2022, Federal Express announced a 251,000 sq. ft. building in Falling Branch Corporate Park Phase II. The company purchased 41 acres from the Economic Development Authority. The building is scheduled to open in the first quarter of 2023 with 175 employees.
Since January 2014, companies working with the Montgomery County Economic Development Authority have announced over $116.09 million in new capital investment (industrial/commercial, non-retail) and the addition of nearly 2,159 related jobs as shown in the chart below.
Business Announcements, Montgomery County, Virginia:
The Board of Supervisors, Economic Development staff, the Economic Development Authority, the Economic Development Commission (EDC), and the Montgomery/Blacksburg/Christiansburg Development Corporation continue to support business, create jobs, and improve the County’s standard of living by diversifying the economy, expanding existing businesses, and attracting new economic activity.
Recent initiatives of the Board of Supervisors promote Montgomery County’s economic progress, improve the community’s quality of life, and poise the County to respond to future development needs. New jobs, expanded employment within industry and service sectors, and a comparatively low unemployment rate all suggest a trend of stable, manageable growth despite the COVID-19 pandemic.
The County staff, following specific directives of the Board of Supervisors, has been involved in a variety of projects throughout the year. These projects reflect the government’s commitment to ensuring that its citizens are able to live and work in an enviable environment. Major initiatives for 2022 include:
The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for 2022 through 2026 serves as a planning tool for the efficient and effective distribution of public improvements throughout the County and the school system. The five-year CIP totals $78.0 million, and is comprised of County Capital Improvements of $37.1 million and School Capital Improvements of $40.9 million.
Since 2009, the Board of Supervisors has earmarked a portion of the real estate tax rate to provide the County’s Fire and Rescue Commission with an ongoing source of funding to purchase fire and rescue capital equipment. One and a half cents of the tax rate have been set aside annually since fiscal year 2017 for fire and rescue equipment. Each year the Commission, comprised of representatives from each fire and rescue agency, the Board of Supervisors and County staff, decide how to effectively distribute this funding based on existing and future capital needs of the County’s fire and rescue agencies, as outlined in their replacement plan. For 2022, approximately $1.3 million was provided for fire and rescue capital needs.
The County provides $750,000 annually to address major capital repairs and large-scale components of County facilities that cannot be addressed within the General Fund. These funds may be used for projects such as roofreplacements,heating ventilationandair conditioning (HVAC) upgrades,flooring, paving, and other major facility system upgrades.
In2022,theCountyalsoprovided$425,000forParksandRecreationfortheAuburnParkproject,$210,000 for Information Technology infrastructure improvements within County facilities, and also added $878,258 oronecentoftherealestatetaxrateforfutureCountycapitalneeds. Ofthisamount,$100,000isearmarked for the Valley to Valley Trail project, a proposed hiking/bike trail that would connect Montgomery County to the Roanoke Valley area to the northeast.
Capital Projects Completed During the Year
Public safety remains a priority with $1,160,112 in fire and rescue equipment purchases in fiscal year 2022 based on recommendations of the Fire and Rescue Commission. Equipment purchases included:
Two attack vehicles for Riner Fire Department,
Equipment for an Elliston Fire Department fire truck, and
Ambulance for Riner Rescue Squad.
The County received $30 million in bond proceeds in October 2019 through the Virginia Public School Authority. This funding, along with $5 million in County dollars is financing renovations and additions at Christiansburg Primary School, Christiansburg Elementary School and Belview Elementary School, which were completed in 2022.
As the Board of Supervisors and County staff focus on the future, several new initiatives are underway
Since 2014, the County has set aside cash-to-capital monies for future new school capital construction, currently earmarking two and a half cents of the real estate tax rate on a yearly basis for future school capital projects. For fiscal year 2022, this amount totaled approximately $2.2 million. Since fiscal year 2014, these funds have been combined with other funds to fund projects including renovations to Falling Branch Elementary School, renovation of a portion of the Christiansburg High School athletic facilities, renovations to house the new County Schools Operations Center, a portion of the renovation costs of Christiansburg Primary, Christiansburg Elementary and Belview Elementary Schools, and architectural studies of Christiansburg High School renovations and future school projects.
The County received $90 million in bond proceeds in April 2022 through the Virginia Public School Authority. This funding will be used to finance the renovations and additions to Christiansburg High School. Architectural and engineering studies for the renovations are underway.
The County received $10 million in bond proceeds in May 2022. This funding will be used for several projects including improvements and renovations to the County Government Center, Creed Fields Park lighting, Auburn Park and the Cinnabar Green Space and Storage project.
The County received $19.2 million in American Rescue Plan funds (half of these funds were received in fiscal year 2021 and half were received in fiscal year 2022). These funds are planned to be used to expand broadband to unserved/underserved areas of the County, improve water/sewer infrastructure and assist in several County Capital projects including construction of a facility for the Magistrates and Court Services operations,a new emergency services facilityin the eastern part of the County, Creed Fields Park lighting (in addition to bond funding) and library improvements.
The construction of the Combined County Maintenance Facility and Garage is nearly complete at a total cost of approximately $5.1 million ($3.9 million County and $1.2 million PSA). The facility will provide maintenance services space to General Services, Lawns and Landscaping, Parks and Recreation, the Garage and PSA.
The Auburn Park in the Riner area is under development with grading complete and construction planning in process The park is expected to be complete by the end of 2023.
Improvements in the Government Center are continuing. Some improvements including renovations to the Treasurer’s office area were completed in fiscal year 2022. Further office renovations including the Commissioner of the Revenue, Planning and Administration are planned for fiscal year 2023.
Montgomery County has enjoyed a long and successful history of volunteerism within the various fire and rescue departments across the County. In recent years, areas of the County have been impacted by a decrease in volunteerism, while calls for service have continued to grow. In the fall of 2020, the County began assessing the volunteer rescue squads to determine the need for paid EMS staff. After a few months of reviewing calls for service reports, response times, and various other aspects of the EMS system, it was determined the County needed paid staff to supplement the volunteers. The County looked at the feasibility of hiring an outside contractor to provide these services, but determined the most effective and fiscally responsible approach was for the County to hire staff.
Montgomery County Fire-EMS was formed in the spring of 2022 after applying for an EMS license from the State, developing protocols and procedures, hiring staff, and purchasing all necessary equipment. The Montgomery County Fire-EMS Department consists of paid first responders who assist volunteer agencies with call coverage. This new program provides full-time and part-time positions. The purpose of this program is not to replace our volunteer agencies, but to provide first response capabilities when a citizen calls for an emergency in areas of the County that are struggling to support rescue calls with volunteer staff.
Montgomery County Fire-EMS has two different mission statements, as they are responsible for the agency’s operations and providing support to the County’s volunteer agencies:
“To provide citizens and visitors of Montgomery County high-quality, timely Emergency Medical and Fire Services.”
“To provide our volunteers the resources, training, and information needed to respond to any emergency.”
On April 24, 2022, Montgomery County Fire-EMS placed two ambulance crews in service providing supplemented coverage to the Shawsville/Elliston and Riner areas of the County, as well as a nighttime response vehicle staffed by a paramedic. Since that time, an additional 12-hour shift has been placed in service in the Shawsville/Elliston area of the County. In the first ten months of operation, the staff has responded to 1,218 calls for service, putting the agency on pace to run approximately 13% of the 12,000 EMS calls annually.
Although the County budgets and manages its financial affairs using the cash basis of accounting, generally accepted accounting principles require localities to use the accrual or modified accrual basis of accounting to prepare financial statements. The modified accrual basis of accounting recognizes revenues when measurable and available and recognizes expenditures when the services or goods are received and the liabilities incurred. The accruals recorded on the financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, reflect cash that will not be received or disbursed until fiscal year 2023
County management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure designed to ensure that the assets of the County are protected from loss, theft or misuse and to ensure that adequate accounting data are compiled to allow for the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The internal control structure is designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that these objectives are met. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that: (1) the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived; and (2) the valuation of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgments by management. All internal control evaluations occur within the above framework. We believe the County’s internal accounting controls adequately safeguard assets and provide reasonable assurance of proper recording of financial transactions.
Budgetary control is established at the organizational level within an individual fund. The budget is implemented through appropriations that are made by the Board of Supervisors on an annual basis with supplemental appropriations made as required. These appropriations may be greater or less than contemplated in the budget.
The government also maintains an encumbrance accounting system as one technique of accomplishing budgetary control. All amounts lapse at year-end. Material encumbrances outstanding at year-end are reported as either a commitment or assignment of fund balance since they do not constitute expenditures or liabilities. Funding for these encumbrances generally is re-appropriated in the subsequent year.
State statutes require an annual audit by independent certified public accountants. In addition to meeting the requirements set forth in state statutes, the audit also was designed in conformity with provisions at Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Generally accepted auditing standards and the standards set forth in the Government Accountability Office’s Government Auditing Standards were used by the auditors in conducting the engagement. The auditor’s report on the basic financial statements is included in the financial section of this report. The auditor’s reports related specifically to the single audit are included in the Compliance Section.
Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the County of Montgomery for its annual comprehensive financial report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021. This was the 35th consecutive year that the County has achieved this prestigious award. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a government must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized annual comprehensive financial report. This report must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements.
A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe that our current annual comprehensive financial report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program’s requirements and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate.
The County has established and continues to maintain a strong and stable financial position through progressive management of financial operations and through sound accounting and financial reporting practices. Appreciation is expressed to the members of the Montgomery County Board of Supervisors and to each of the Constitutional Officers for their interest and suppmt in planning and conducting the financial operations of the County in a responsible and progressive manner.
The preparation of the annual comprehensive financial report was made possible by the dedicated service of the entire staff of the Finance Department, and other departmental personnel. We would also like to express our appreciation to the County's independent auditing firm, Brown, Edwards & Company, L.L.P. for their cooperation and assistance in these effo1ts.
Respectfully submitted,
F. Craig Meadows County Administrator Lisa Rayne Finance DirectorSara R. Bohn
Sherri M. Blevins, Chair
Mary W. Biggs, Vice Chair
M. Todd King
April N. DeMotts Darrell O. Sheppard
Steve R. Fijalkowski
Charles E. Campbell Director of Public Service Authority
A. Michelle Dickerson Virginia Cooperative Extension Unit Coordinator
Kelly M. Edmonson Director of Social Services
Michael P. Geary Director of Emergency Services
Brian T. Hamilton Director of Economic Development
Jennifer T. Harris
Mitchell B. Haugh
Director of Public Information
Director of Parks and Recreation
Angela M. Hill Deputy County Administrator/CFO
Brea G. Hopkins Interim Director of Planning
Karim H. Khan Director of Montgomery Regional Library
Marc M. Magruder Director of Management Services and Budget
Clay M. McCoy Director of Human Resources
Martin M. McMahon County Attorney
F. Craig Meadows County Administrator
Lisa Rayne Director of Finance
Vacant Director of Information Technology
Connie M. Viar General Registrar
Andrea W. Whitaker Interim Superintendent of Schools
Tonia D. Winn Director of Human Services
Scott A. Woodrum Director of Engineering and Regulatory Compliance
Erica W. Conner Clerk of the Circuit Court
Charles H. Partin Sheriff
Mary K. Pettitt Commonwealth Attorney
Helen P. Royal Commissioner of the Revenue
Helen V. St. Clair Treasurer
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, and each major fund of the County of Montgomery, Virginia (the “County”), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2022, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the County’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, and each major fund of the County, as of June 30, 2022, and the respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows thereof for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and Specifications for Audits of Counties, Cities, and Towns and Specifications for Audits of Authorities, Boards and Commissions issued by the Auditor of Public Accounts of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are required to be independent of the County and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.
As described in Notes 5 and 8 to the financial statements, in 2022, the County adopted new accounting guidance, GASB Statement No. 87, Leases. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the County’s ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the financial statement date, including any currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinions. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statements.
In performing an audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, we:
Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit.
Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the County’s internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements.
Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the County’s ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control-related matters that we identified during the audit.
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management’s discussion and analysis and other required supplementary information and notes to the required supplementary information, as listed in the table of contents, be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management, and, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the County’s basic financial statements. The supplementary information as listed in the table of contents and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards, as required by Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the supplementary information as listed in the table of contents and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards are fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.
Management is responsible for the other information included in the annual report. The other information comprises the introductory and statistical sections but does not include the basic financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. Our opinions on the basic financial statements do not cover the other information, and we do not express an opinion or any form of assurance thereon.
In connection with our audit of the basic financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and consider whether a material inconsistency exists between the other information and the basic financial statements, or the other information otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, based on the work performed, we conclude that an uncorrected material misstatement of the other information exists, we are required to describe it in our report
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated March 28, 2023 on our consideration of the County’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the County’s internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the County’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance.
Roanoke, Virginia
March 28, 2023
The following discussion and analysis of the County of Montgomery’s financial performance provides an overview of the County’s financial activities for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 Please read it in conjunction with the transmittal letter at the front of this report and with the County’s financial statements, which follow this section.
The total assets and deferred outflows of resources of the governmental activities exceeded its liabilities and deferred inflows of resources at the close of the most recent fiscal year by approximately $220 million (net position). Of this amount $60 million (unrestricted net position) may be used to meet the County’s ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors.
Total general fund revenues exceeded the final budgeted amount by $16 million.
Grant funding does not follow the fiscal year; therefore, the original appropriation of funds does not always coincide with the year the funds are received. As a result, intergovernmental revenues exceeded budgeted amountsbyapproximately$8.6million. ThiswasprimarilyduetothereceiptofthesecondAmericanRescue Plan Act (ARPA) payment of $9.6 million which was received but not appropriated beforeJune 30. Property tax revenue exceeded the budgeted estimate by $3.8 million primarily from unbudgeted delinquent tax collections of $2.1 million, real estate tax collections of $1.0 million and personal property tax collections of $0.7 million. Other local tax exceeded budget by $3.1 million due to sales and use tax exceeding the budget estimate by $2.2 million and recordation tax by $0.8 million.
Actual expenditures were $20.6 million less than the final expenditure appropriation. As always, the County received and included in the final approved budget various grant awards during the year; however, not all wereexpendedbeforeyear-end. Ordershadbeenplaced,butgoodsnotreceivedatyear-endofapproximately $1.6 million for the County and approximately $0.5 million for the Schools.
County administration expenditures totaled approximately $1.2 million less than appropriated. The Human Resources Department carried over funds for an employee career development program, which, when combine with the current year allocation, resulted in unspent funds totaling $219,000. Emergency Services had $584,000 appropriated for equipment. This equipment had not been purchased as of June 30, 2022. The remaining funds resulted from vacancy savings. Information Technology, the Treasurer’s Office and the Commonwealth Attorney’s Office also had vacancies savings resulting in unspent funds of $36,000, $39,000 and $86,000, respectively. $434,000 were appropriated to the Commissioner of Revenue for the general reassessment. Thereassessmentwasongoingasofyearend. TheGeneralRegistrarofElectionshad$397,000 appropriated for voting equipment. This equipment had not been purchased as of June 30, 2022.
Sheriff’s office expenditures were $1.2 million less than budgeted. The County’s payments to the Western Virginia Regional Jail were $899,000 less than planned as the County’s inmate population at the jail was less than expected. Vacancy savings combined with grants and related restricted funds with cycles that did not follow the fiscal year made up the remaining $301,000. The County fire and rescue departments had approximately $197,000 inyear-end funding that was allocatedfor projectsthat were not yet complete at year end.
The Animal Care and Adoption Center had unspent funds of $109,000 including $41,000 in vacancy savings and $51,000 appropriated for equipment and site improvements not incurred at year end General Services expenditures were approximately $609,000 less than budget. This is due in part to $240,000 appropriated for equipment not received at year end along with vacancy savings of $157,000 Each year funds are budgeted for sustainability projects. Approximately $88,000 of budgeted funds were not needed for these projects in FY 22 Funds are budgeted each year in Engineering and Regulatory Compliance for maintenance and remediation of the County’s two closed landfills. Approximately $89,000 of budgeted funds were unspent at year end
Fundsarebudgetedeach yearforChildren’sServiceActservices. Approximately$96,000ofbudgetedfunds were not needed for these services in FY 22. Human Services and Social Services had unspent funds of $81,000 and $336,000, respectively, primarily due to salaries savings resulting from position turnover. Parks and recreation had expenditure savings of more than $166,000; $95,000 was the result of salary savings. The library also realized salary savings of approximately $173,000.
Planning and GIS had vacant positions during the year resulting in salary savings of $98,000. Funds were budgeted but not yet spentfor consultantsfor the transportation plan; the Old Price’s Fork Elementary School project; and Neighbors in Need grants totaling savings of almost $174,000. Similarly, ARPA funds for the expansion of broadband service of $6 million and the Virginia Telecommunications Initiative (VATI) broadband grant totaling over $1 million were appropriated to Economic Development. Costs had not been incurred for these projects as of June 30, 2022. Also, ARPA funds of $1.5 million were appropriated to other agencies for water and sewer projects. These projects had not been started at year end.
General and Special Contingencies had remaining balances of just over $332,000 and $8,000, respectively. The use of General Contingencies varies from year to year based on the amount of funding needed for unanticipated costs. The County’s financial policies require one percent of the County’s general fund be set aside for contingencies each year. Of the $536,000 designated in fiscal year 2022, a balance of $332,000 remained at year end.
Finally, theMontgomery County School Board (the Schools) spent $4.3 million lessthan appropriated during theyear Thisresultedincorrespondinglowergeneralfundexpendituresforeducationastheamountrequired to be provided by the County to the Schools was lower. The schools had placed orders for goods that were not received by year end of approximately $0.5 million.
Net position of the Public Service Authority at June 30, 2022 was up $216,000 from the previous year. This was primarily the result of facilities fees increasing $170,000 from the prior year.
At the end of the current fiscal year, unassigned fund balance for the general fund was approximately $38.8 million, or 17% of fiscal year 2022 general and school operating fund revenues less the general fund transfer to the school operating fund. The Board of Supervisors has adopted a policy to maintain this percentage at a minimum of 12%. The percentage exceeds the target at year end as a result of the increase in General Fund balance of $2.0 million, primarily due to revenues exceeding budgeted amounts as discussed above.
Inthecurrentyear,theCountyimplementedGASBStatementNo.87,Leases,whichimprovestheaccounting and financial reporting for leases by governments.
This discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the County of Montgomery’s basic financial statements which comprise three sections: 1) government-wide financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the financial statements. This report also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements themselves.
These statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the County’s finances, in a manner similar to a private-sector business.
The statement of net position presents information on all of the County’s assets, deferred outflow of resources, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources, with the difference between the four reported as net position. Over time, increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the County is improving or deteriorating. Increases in net position may indicate an improved financial position; however, even decreases in net position may reflect a changing manner in which the County used previously accumulated funds.
The statement of activities presents how the government’s net position changed during the recent fiscal year. All changes in net position are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus,revenuesandexpensesarereportedinthisstatementforsomeitemsthatwillresult in cash flows in future fiscal periods (e.g., uncollected taxes and earned but unused vacation leave).
The government-wide financial statements include the County (known as the primary government) as well as funds of the Montgomery County Public Service Authority, the Montgomery County School Board, and the Montgomery County Economic Development Authority. The functions of the County, including general government; judicial administration; public safety; health and welfare; parks and recreation; public works and community development are principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues (governmental activities). Financial information for the component units are reported separately from the financial information presented for the primary government.
A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The County, like other state and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance related legal requirements. All funds of the County can be divided into two categories: governmental funds and proprietary funds.
Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. However, unlike the government-wide financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on near-term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as on balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluation of the County’s near-term financing requirements. In particular, unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a government’s net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year.
Fund balances are the differences between assets and liabilities in governmental funds.
Nonspendable fund balance includes amounts that are not in spendable form, or amounts that are required to be maintained intact.
Restricted fund balance includes amounts that can be spent only for the specific purposes stipulated by external providers, such as grantors or bondholders, as well as amounts that are restricted through enabling legislation.
Committed fund balance includes amounts that can be used only for the specific purposes that are determined by a formal action of the government’s highest level of decision making authority.
Assigned fund balance applies to amounts that are intended for specific purposes as expressed by the governing body or authorized official and applies to remaining resources in any governmental funds other than the general fund.
Unassigned fund balance includes all amounts not contained in other classifications for the general fund, and deficit fund balances in any other governmental funds. As of the end of the current fiscal year, the County’s total governmental funds reported an ending fund balance of $186.8 million, an increase of $83.2 million in comparison with the prior year. Bond proceeds of more than $101 million, were received during the current fiscal year for Christiansburg High School renovations and other County capital projects This $101 million increase was offset by a reduction of revenues due to the CARES revenue recognized in theprioryear. Endingfundbalancewascomprisedof:$6 1 million,nonspendable; $106.4 million,restricted; $24.9 million, committed; $10.6 million, assigned; and $38.8 million, unassigned.
As a measure of the general fund’s liquidity, it may be useful to compare both unassigned fund balance and total fund balance to total fund expenditures. Unassigned fund balance represents 28% of total general fund expenditures,while total fund balance represents 47% of that same amount.
Becausethefocusofgovernmentalfundsisnarrowerthanthatofthegovernment-widefinancialstatements,itisuseful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. By doing so, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the County’s near-term financing decisions. Both the governmental fund balance sheet and the governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities
The County adopts an annual budget. A budgetary comparison statement has been provided to demonstrate compliance with this budget.
Proprietary funds present functions that are intended to account for the revenues and expenses of providing those services to citizens and businesses, where the intent is that the costs are financed through user charges. The Montgomery County Public Service Authority’s water and wastewater funds are proprietary funds.
The following table reflects the condensed Statement of Net Position in millions:
Totalnetpositionshownaboveforgovernmentalactivitiesis$220.1millionor$20.6millionmorethanin2021 Total assets increased $115.6 million primarily due to bond proceeds received but not spent during the year and additions to construction in progress Total liabilities increased $78.1 million due to an increase in unearned revenue and new debt; which was partially offset by a decrease in net pension liability
Total net position shown above for component units is $(26.5) million for 2022, an increase from $(38.7) million in 2021. This consists of a net position for the Public Service Authority of $12.1 million, a deficit in net position of $39.9 million for the School Board, and a net position of $1.3 million for the Economic Development Authority.
The following chart shows the revenues and expenses of the governmental activities in millions:
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, revenues from governmental activities totaled $150.7 million, a decrease of $12.0 million compared to fiscal year 2021 Primary reasons for this decrease include:
In the prior year, revenue of more than $17.1 million in CARES funding was recognized;
In the current year this decrease was offset by an increase of $3.7 million in property taxes and $1.8 million in other taxes.
Component unit revenues total $147.3 million, including a $54.4 million transferfrom the general fund tothe schools Thisincludes$53.9millionforoperations. GASB34requiresthatschooldebtservicebeincludedinthegeneralfund, as the schools cannot issue debt on their own. County funds associated with school debt service totaled $21.1 million, which brings the total provided for school purposes to $75 million.
Expenses for governmental activities totaled $130.1 million in 2022, a decrease of $23.9 million from 2021. General government administration increased $1.1 million as the County began implementing paid Emergency Medical Services in fiscal year 2022; health and welfare decreased $12.8 million due to CARES funding spent in fiscal year 2021; education decreased $12.6; parks, recreational and cultural increased $0.7 million, community development decreased $1.2 million and interest on long term debt increased $0.9 million. The County’s original approved budget included an increased transfer to the schools of $500,000 more than 2021; and, the County provided additional funds on a cash basis of approximately $0.9 million during the year. Total school board expenses decreased $6.5 million on a full accrual basis. This includes adjustments for pension expenses.
Expenses for component unit – Public Service Authority expenses remained flat at $4.9 million.
Education is a very high priority in the Montgomery County community; consequently, the Board of Supervisors contributed $54.4 million to the operation of the schools. Depreciation expense related to the schools totaled $6.8 million.
Total expenses for education were $61.1 million. This amount represented about 47% of governmental activity expenses. When interest for school related projects is included, the County contributed $67.1 million, or 52%. On the cash basis of accounting, total school expenses, including expenses funded through the state and federal government and debt service for school related projects, were equal to 72% of the general fund expenses (excluding payments to the schools), plus school operating fund expenses for 2022
ForthefiscalyearendedJune30,2022,thegovernmentalfundsreflectacombinedfundbalanceof$186.8,anincrease of $83.3 million from June 30, 2021 The total consisted of $64.6 million in the general fund and $122.2 million in the County capital fund. The general fund balance increased $2.0 million in fiscal year 2022 The schooloperatingfundspent$1.6millionlessthanpermittedbytherevisedbudget,whichresultedinacorrespondingly lower than budgeted transfer to the schools from the general fund. The balance was transferred to the schools after yearendforone-timeuses. TheCountycapitalprojectsfundbalanceincreased$81.3million,includingdebtproceeds of $101.1 million and transfers from the general fund of $11.6 million. Transfers of almost $6 million are included in the budget for large fire and rescue equipment purchases, capital maintenance projects, parks and recreation projects, IT projects, and other future County and School capital projects. Additionally, transfers of $5.8 million will be used for various County and school projects, including $5.0 million for the Christiansburg High School renovation project. The funds for the Christiansburg High School renovation project were returned to the County from School bond proceeds in fiscal year 2023.
Thefollowingtablepresentsbudgetedandactualrevenuesandexpenditures(cashbasis)forthegeneralfundforfiscal year 2022 in millions:
Increasesinintergovernmentalandotherrevenuecategoriesmadeupthechangesfromtheoriginaltothefinalbudget The increase in intergovernmental revenue included an appropriation of $920,000 for the VATI grant and $501,000 forCARESActfunds;$646,000toreconciletheDepartmentofSocialServicestothestateapprovedbudget;$236,000 for Children Services Act services; $440,000 to reconcile shared expenses to the state approved Compensation Board funding; $405,000 for Neighbors in Need funding; and $851,000 in various additional small grants.
The increase in the final budget for expenditures over the original budget of $29.2 million resulted primarily from:
ARPA funds totaling $7.5 million;
Encumbrances of $0.6 million and $3.1 million for the County and Schools, respectively;
Carryovers of unspent grant funds and other donations of $0.3 million;
Carryovers from the fiscal year 2021 budget of $1.2 million for the general fund, and $5.6 million for the Schools;
Funding for the school capital needs of $5 million;
Fundingforaonetimepaysupplementof$800,000;paidEmergencyMedicalServicesof$600,000; reassessment services of $685,000; and $400,000 for voting machines.
Actualtaxrevenueexceededthebudgetedby$6.9million.Personalpropertytaxesandrealestatecollectionsexceeded theestimatesby$3.8 million. Salestaxrevenueexceededtheestimateby$2.2 million. Recordationtax,which varies with home sales exceeded the expected amount by $0.8 million. American Rescue Plan Act funds of $9.6 million are included in the intergovernmental category but were not budgeted before June 30. Actual expenditures and transfers were$20.2lessthanthebudgetedamountforseveralreasons,includingthetimingofgrantsandotherspecialprojects. The transfer from the general fund to the school operating fund on the budgetary basis (cash) was $4.3 million less than the budgeted amount. This is due in part to the schools receiving more state and federal revenue than budgeted, which resulted in a lower than budgeted amount needed from the County and the schools spending $1.6 million less than budgeted. The balance of the transfer to the Schools and the funds associated with 2022 outstanding purchase orders for the schools were approved by the Board of Supervisors and transferred to the Schools in fiscal year 2023.
At June 30, 2022, the County had invested $286.5 million, net of accumulated depreciation, in a variety of capital assets including buildings, park facilities, and sheriff and fire protection.
The following table displays the County and Component Units capital assets in millions of dollars:
The table below shows the change in capital assets in millions of dollars:
Additional information about the County’s capital assets, including the component unit Public Service Authority and school board can be found in Note 8 of this report.
The following table displays the Governmental and Component Unit outstanding debt at June 30, 2022, in millions of dollars:
Otherobligationsincludeleaseliabilities,accruedcompensatedabsences,andaccruedlandfillclosureandpost-closure costs. More detailed information about the County’s long-term debt can be found in Note 9 of this report. Debt for school assets is included with Governmental Activities under GASB 34, as schools in Virginia are not able to issue debt.
The Montgomery County Board of Supervisors adopted the following debt policy on September 28, 2015:
1. The County will confine long-term borrowing to capital improvements or projects that cannot be financed from current revenues except where approved justification is provided.
2. When the County finances capital improvements or other projects by issuing bonds or entering into capital leases, it will repay the debt within a period not to exceed the expected useful life of the project.
3. Net debt as a percentage of estimated market value of taxable property should strive to be below 3% but should not exceed 4%.
4. The ratio of debt service expenditures as a percent of governmental fund expenditures (General fund plus School Operating fund expenditures less the General Fund transfer to the School Operating Fund) should strive to be below 10% but not exceed 12%.
5. TheCountywillreviewthetenyeartaxsupporteddebtandleasepayoutratioannually,andintendstomaintain the ratio at 60% over a five year period, with the ratio being no less than 55% in any one year during the period.
6. The County recognizes the importance of underlying and overlapping debt in analyzing financial condition. The County will regularly analyze total indebtedness including underlying and overlapping debt.
7. Where feasible, the County will explore the usage of special assessment, revenue, or other self-supporting bonds instead of general obligation bonds.
8. The County will retire tax anticipation debt, if any, annually and will retire bond anticipation debt within six months after completion of the project.
9. On all general fund supported, debt-financed projects, the County will attempt to make a down payment of at least 5% of total project costs in the aggregate from current resources. The long-term goal is to annually designate a portion of General Fund cash for one time capital projects.
As of June 30, 2022, the County was in compliance with all debt policies.
As of October 2022, the County’s and state’s unemployment rates were 2.7 percent and 2.8 percent, which is an increase of 0.3 percent from the previous year’s rate for the County and a decrease of 0.3 percent for the state.
This financial report is designed to provide our citizens, taxpayers, customers, investors, and creditors with a general overviewoftheCounty’sfinancesandtodemonstratetheCounty’saccountabilityforthemoneyitreceives. Questions concerning this report or requests for additional financial information should be directed to the Director of Finance, 755 Roanoke Street, Christiansburg, Virginia 24073.
benefits (Notes 13 and 14)
June 30, 2022
The Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
June 30, 2022
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net position (Exhibit 1) are different because:
assets used in governmental activities are not current financial resources, and therefore, are not reported in the funds.
Right-to-use assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources, and therefore, are not reported in the funds.
Certain amounts are recognized as expenditures when paid in the fund statements, but are capitalized and recorded in future periods for governmental activities.
Other long-term assets are not available to pay for current-period expenditures and, therefore, are deferred in the funds.
Deferred premiums and charges on refunding are not financial resources and, therefore, are not reported in the funds.
Financial statement elements related to pensions are applicable to future periods and, therefore, are not reported in the funds.
liabilities, including bonds payable, are not due and payable in the current period and therefore are not reported in the funds
EXHIBIT 4
The Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Reconciliation of the statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances of governmental funds to the statement of activities:
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of activities are different because:
Net change in fund balances – total governmental funds
Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives and reported as depreciation expense. This is the amount by which capital outlays $30,900,393 exceeded depreciation $11,248,726 in the current period.
In the statement of activities, only the gain or loss on the sale of capital assets is reported, whereas in the governmental funds, the entire proceeds from the sale increase financial resources. Thus, the change in net position differs from the change in fund balances by the net book value of the property sold.
Revenues in the statement of activities that do not provide current financial resources are not reported as revenues in the funds.
Governmental funds report pension contributions as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities, the cost of pension benefits earned net of employee contributions is reported as pension expense.
Governmental funds report employer other postemployment benefit contributions as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities, the cost of other postemployment benefits earned, net of employee contributions, is reported as other postemployment benefit expense.
The issuance of long-term debt provides current financial resources to governmental funds, while the repayment of the principal of long-term debt consumes the current financial resources of governmental funds. Neither transaction, however, has any effect on net assets.
Governmental funds report the effect of bond premiums and discounts when debt is first issued, whereas these amounts are deferred and amortized in the statement of activities.
Interest is recognized as an expenditure in the governmental funds when it is due. In statement of activities, interest is recognized as it accrues, regardless of when it is due. The net effect of those differences are as follows:
Some expenses reported in the statement of activities do not require the use of current financial resources and, therefore, are not reported as expenditures in governmental funds.
EXHIBIT Budgeted Amounts
5
13
June 30, 2022
The financial statements of the County of Montgomery, Virginia (the “County”), have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America as applied to governmental units. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is the accepted standard-setting body for establishing governmental accounting and financial reporting principles. Significant accounting policies of the County are described below.
Primary Government. The County is a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia governed by a seven-member elected Board of Supervisors (the “Board”) The accompanying financial statements for the primary government and its component units are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) applicable to governmental units, as prescribed by the GASB.
Discretely Presented Component Units. Discretely presented component units are entities that are legally separate from the County, but for which the County is financially accountable, or whose relationship with the County is such that exclusion would cause the financial statements to be misleading or incomplete. They are reported in a separate column in the government-wide financial statements to emphasize they are legally separate from the County.
The Montgomery County School Board (the “School Board”) is responsible for elementary and secondary education within the County’s jurisdiction. The School Board is comprised of seven members popularly elected to a four-year term. The School Board is fiscally dependent upon the County because the County Board approves the School Board budget, levies the necessary taxes to finance operations, and approves the borrowing of money and issuance of debt. The School Board does not issue separate financial statements; as such, they have been included in these statements.
The Public Service Authority (the “Authority”) provides water and wastewater services for County businesses and residents. The County Board of Supervisors has historically appointed themselves as the Authority’s Board of Directors. The Authority does not provide financial benefit to or impose a financial burden on the County. Complete financial statements may be obtained by writing the Montgomery County Public Service Authority, 755 Roanoke Street, Christiansburg, Virginia 24073.
The Montgomery County Economic Development Authority (the “EDA”) was created to encourageandprovidefinancingforeconomicdevelopmentintheCounty. TheEDAisgoverned by seven directors appointed by the County Board of Supervisors and the County is financially accountable for the EDA. The County routinely provides funding to support the EDA’s operations. The EDA is authorized to acquire, own, lease, and dispose of properties to the extent that such activities foster and stimulate economic development. Complete financial statements may be obtained by writing the Montgomery County Economic Development Authority, 755 Roanoke Street, Christiansburg, Virginia 24073.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
The following entities are excluded from the accompanying financial statements: Jointly Governed Organizations:
The County and the Counties of Floyd, Giles, Pulaski, and the City of Radford participate in supporting New River Valley Community Services (“NRVCS”) The governing body of this organization is appointed by the respective governing bodies of the participating jurisdictions. For the current year, the County contributed $208,811 to NRVCS
The Virginia Tech Montgomery Executive Airport Authority (the “Airport Authority”) was createdbyconcurrentresolutionsofthegoverningbodiesoftheCounty,theTownsofBlacksburg and Christiansburg, and Virginia Tech. The Airport Authority is governed by a five member boardwherebythe governingbodyofeach memberjurisdictionappointsoneboardmember,and alljurisdictionsjointlyappointafifthmember. TheAirportAuthorityutilizesrevenuesgenerated by the airport and contributions by the members to fund all airport activities and has no bonded indebtedness For the current year, the County paid $60,000 toward operations of the Airport Authority.
The County is a member of the Montgomery Regional Solid Waste Authority (the “Waste Authority”),whichwascreatedbyajointresolutionbytheCounty,theTownsofBlacksburgand Christiansburg, and Virginia Tech. The Waste Authority is governed by a five member board whereby the governing body of each member jurisdiction appoints one board member and all jurisdictions jointly appoint a fifth member. The Waste Authority, which began operation in August 1995, serves as a solid waste transfer station and recycling facility. Each jurisdiction provides collection of solid waste and recyclables from within its jurisdiction and delivers the collected materials to the Waste Authority. All Waste Authority operations are financed by tipping fees and the individual jurisdictions are not liable for the debt of the Waste Authority. The Waste Authority has negotiated with New River Resource Authority for shared use of a landfill with an anticipated operating life of 50 years. For the current year, the County paid $864,593 in tipping fees to the Waste Authority.
TheCountyisamemberoftheNewRiverValleyMetropolitanPlanningOrganization(“MPO”). In 2003, the Blacksburg/Christiansburg/Montgomery Area Metropolitan Planning Organization was created as a transportation policy-making organization serving the Blacksburg, Christiansburg, and Montgomery area. In 2012, the MPO was expanded to also include the City of Radford and a portion of Pulaski County. The Blacksburg/Christiansburg/Montgomery Area MetropolitanPlanningOrganizationwasrenamedandprovidestheinformation,tools,andpublic input necessary to improve the performance of the transportation system of the region. Future transportation needs are addressed, giving consideration to all possible strategies and the community’s vision. The County has three members within this organization, two of which are voting members. For the current year, the County paid $19,800 toward operations of the MPO.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
TheCounty,alongwiththeCountiesofFranklinandRoanokeandtheCityofSalem,isamember of the Western Virginia Regional Jail Authority (WVRJA) which was created in June 2005. The WVRJA was formed to own, operate, manage, maintain, regulate, plan for and finance the regional jail. The Board consists of twelve members, three from each jurisdiction consistingoftheSheriff,oneelectedmemberofthe governingbody,andthechiefadministrative officer. The member jurisdictions are responsible for a portion of the debt service and per diem cost based on prisoner days used. For the current year, the County paid $3,179,655 to the WVRJA.
The County is a member of the New River Valley Emergency Communications Regional Authority (the “Communications Authority”). The Communications Authority is a regional partnership, serving the County of Montgomery, the Towns of Blacksburg and Christiansburg, and Virginia Tech. The Communications Authority began providing 911 dispatch and emergency communication services to the community and agencies in these localities on July 1, 2016. The Board consists of 5 members, one from each member and all members jointly appoint a fifth member. For the current year, the County paid $926,379 toward the operations of the Communications Authority.
The County, along with the Towns of Blacksburg and Christiansburg, is a member of the Montgomery Tourism Development Council (the “Council”) The Council was formed to stimulate economic opportunity and enhance quality of life by celebrating and sharing the region’s culture, heritage, and natural beauty through authentic visitor experiences. The operating board consists of the County Administrator and Town Managers. For the current year, the County paid $40,652 toward the operations of the Council.
The NRV Regional Water Authority (NRVRWA) operates and maintains a water supply system for the Town of Christiansburg, Town of Blacksburg, Virginia Tech, and Montgomery County. Each governing body appoints one member to the five person Board of Directors, and one at large member. Initially, until the term of one of the current at large members expires, the Board will be comprised of six members. The Board will then be reduced to five and the one at large member will be appointed by the members of the authority. All indebtedness of the NRVRWA is payable solely from the revenues of the water system. Although the Montgomery County Public Service Authority is one of NRVRWA’s customers, neither the County nor the PSA have an obligation for any of its indebtedness During fiscal year 2022, the PSA paid $891,924toNRVRWA Thisconsistsofanannualpaymentof$47,522,whichisthe$1,300,000 membership fee being spread over 40 years (see Note 20) The balance of $844,402 was for water purchases.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Government-wide financial statements consist of a statement of net position and a statement of activities that report information on all activities of the primary government. The effect of inter-fundactivityhasbeenremovedfromthesestatements. Governmental activities solelycomprise the primary government and are supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues Likewise, the primary government is reported separately from certain legally separate component units for which the primary government is financially accountable.
The statement of activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function or segment is offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function or segment. Program revenues include: (1) charges to customers or applicants whopurchase,use,ordirectlybenefitfromgoods,services,orprivilegesprovidedbyagivenfunction or segment, and (2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital requirementsofaparticularfunctionorsegment. Taxesandotheritemsnotincludedamongprogram revenues are reported instead as general revenues.
The government-wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized as revenues in the year for which they are levied. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met.
Governmental fund financial statements use the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized when they become both measurable and available. Accordingly, real and personal property taxes are recorded as deferred revenue and receivables when billed, net of allowances of uncollectible amounts. Real and personal property taxes recorded at June 30, and received within the first 60 days after year end are included in tax revenues, with the related amount reduced from deferred revenues. Sales and utility taxes, which are collected by the state or utility companies and subsequently remitted to the County, are recognized as revenues and amounts receivable when the underlying exchange transaction occurs, which is generally one or two months preceding receipt by the County. Licenses, permits, fines, and rents are recorded as revenues when received. Grant revenues are considered receivable when legal and contractual requirements have been met and available if collected within one year. Revenues from general-purpose grants are recognized in the period in which the grant applies. Sale of real estaterevenueisrecognizedpropertyissold. Allotherrevenueitemsareconsideredtobemeasurable and available only when the government receives cash.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
C. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statement Presentation (Continued)
Expenditures are generally recognized under the modified accrual basis of accounting when the related fund liability is incurred. Exceptions to this rule include: (1) accumulated unpaid leave and other employee amounts which are recorded as compensated absences and other postemployment benefits, which are recognized when paid, and (2) principal and interest payments on general long-term debt, both of which are recognized when due.
The County reports the following major governmental funds:
General Fund – This is the government’s primary operating fund. It accounts for all financial resources of the general government, except those required to be accounted for in other funds.
County Capital Fund – This fund accounts for the financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities, other than those financed by proprietary funds.
The effect of interfund activity has been eliminated from the government-wide financial statements.
Amounts reported as program revenues include charges to customers or applicants for goods, services, or privileges provided, operating grants and contributions, and capital grants and contributions. General revenues include all taxes, grants, and contributions not restricted to specific programs, and other revenues not meeting the definition of program revenues.
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts in demand deposits, as well as short-term investments with a maturity date within three months of date acquired.
Investments are stated at fair value.
Receivables are shown net of an allowance for uncollectible amounts calculated by management using historical collection data, specific account analysis, and management’s judgment.
Inventoriesofsuppliesaregenerallyrecordedatcostusingthefirst-in/first-out(FIFO)methodexcept for commodities received from the Federal Government, which are valued at market. Inventories of governmental funds are recorded as expenditures when consumed rather than when purchased.
Inventories of the EDA include land and buildings held for resale The cost of land (including acquisitioncosts)isallocatedtosubdividedareasforthepurposeofaccumulatingcoststomatchwith sales revenues. Improvement, carrying, and amenity costs are allocated based on acreage. Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Capital assets, which include property, plant, equipment, and right-to-use lease assets, are reported in the government-wide financial statements. Capital assets are defined as items with an initial individual cost of more than $5,000 and an estimated useful life in excess of one year. Such assets arerecordedathistoricalcostorestimatedhistoricalcostifpurchasedorconstructed. Donatedcapital assetsarerecordedatacquisitionvalue.Theleasessectionofthisnoteprovidesadditionalinformation about right-to-use lease assets. The costs of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the assets or materially extend assets lives are not capitalized.
Major outlays for capital assets and improvements are capitalized as projects are constructed.
Capitalassetsaredepreciatedusingthestraight-linemethodoverthefollowingestimatedusefullives:
Right-to-use lease assets are amortized as described in the leases section of this note.
In addition to assets, the statements that present net position report a separate section for deferred outflowsofresources. Theseitemsrepresentaconsumptionofnetassetsthatappliestofutureperiods and so will not be recognized as an outflow of resources (expense) until then.
In addition to liabilities, the statements that present financial position report a separate section for deferred inflows of resources. These items represent anacquisition of net assetsthatapplies tofuture periods and so will not be recognized as an inflow of resources (revenue) until that time.
Leases (Lessee) – The County recognizes a lease liability and an intangible right-to-use lease asset (lease asset) in the governmental activities column in the government-wide financial statements.
At the commencement of a lease, the County initially measures the lease liability at the present value of payments expected to be made during the lease term. Subsequently, the lease liability is reduced by the principal portion of lease payments made. The lease asset is measured initially as the amount of the lease liability, adjusted for lease payments made at or before the lease commencement date, plus certain initial direct costs. Subsequently, the lease asset is amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the lease term or the useful life of the underlying asset, but if the lease contains a purchase option the County is reasonably certain to exercise, the lease asset is amortized over the useful life of the underlying asset. In that circumstance, if the underlying asset is nondepreciable, the lease asset is not amortized.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Leases (Continued)
Key estimates and judgments related to leases include how the County determines (1) the discount rate it uses to discount the expected lease payments to present value, (2) lease term, and (3) lease payments.
TheCountyusestheinterestratechargedbythelessorasthediscountrate.Whentheinterest ratechargedbythelessorisnotprovided,theCountygenerallyusesitsestimatedincremental borrowing rate as the discount rate for equipment leases, building and infrastructure leases.
The lease term includes the noncancellable period of the lease. Lease payments included in the measurement of the lease liability are composed of fixed payments and any purchase option price that the County is reasonably certain to exercise.
The County monitors changes in circumstances that would require a remeasurement of its lease and will remeasure the lease asset and liability if certain changes occur that are expected to significantly affect the amount of the lease liability.
Lease assets are reported with other capital assets and lease liabilities are reported with long-term debt on the statement of net position.
Leases (Lessor)–The County recognizes a lease receivable and a deferredinflow of resourcesin the government-wide and governmental fund financial statements. At the commencement of a lease, the County initially measures the lease receivable at the present value of payments expected to be received during the lease term. Subsequently, the lease receivable is reduced by the principal portion of lease payments received. The deferred inflow of resources is measured initially as the amount of the lease receivable, adjusted for lease payments received at or before the lease commencement date. Subsequently,thedeferredinflowofresourcesisrecognizedasrevenueoverthelifeoftheleaseterm.
Key estimates and judgments include how the County determines (1) the discount rate it uses to discount the expected lease receipts to present value, (2) lease term, and (3) lease receipts.
The County uses the rate implicit in the lease as the discount rate for equipment leases, building and infrastructure leases.
The lease term includes thenoncancellable period ofthe lease. Leasereceipts included in the measurement of the lease receivable are composed of fixed payments from the lessee.
The County monitors changes in circumstances that would require a remeasurement of its lease, and will remeasure thelease receivable and deferred inflows of resources if certain changes occur that are expected to significantly affect the amount of the lease receivable.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
County, PSA, and School Board employees are granted a specified amount of leave with pay each year. Amounts recorded reflect unused leave payable upon termination including applicable employer related taxes, in accordance with respective policies. The cost of accumulated leave pay is accounted for as a liability in the government-wide financial statements and proprietary fund type statements. A liability is reported in the governmental funds only when the amounts become due and payable.
Long-term debt and other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities in the applicable governmental activities, business-type activities, or proprietary fund type statement of net position. Bond premiums and discounts are deferred and amortized over the life of the bonds using the straight-line method.
In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond premiums and discounts, as well as bond issuance costs, during the current period but do not recognize long-term liabilities. The face amount of debt issued is reported as other financing sources. Premiums received on debt issuances are reported as other financing sources while discounts on debt issuances are reported as other financing uses. Repayments and issuance costs are reported as debt service expenditures.
For purposes of measuring all financial statement elements related to pension and OPEB plans, information about the fiduciary net position of the County’s Plans and the additions to/deductions from the County’s Plan’s net fiduciary position have been determined on the same basis as they were reported by the Virginia Retirement System (VRS). For this purpose, benefit payments (including refunds of employee contributions) are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are reported at fair value.
Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing its financial statements. Actual results could differ.
Net position in the government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements is classified as net investment in capital assets, restricted, and unrestricted. Net position is reported as restricted when there are limitations imposed on its use through enabling legislation or through external restrictions imposed by creditors, grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
D. Assets, Deferred Outflows, Liabilities, Deferred Inflows, and Net Position or Fund Equity (Continued)
In the fund financial statements, fund balance is divided into five classifications based primarily on the extent to which the County is bound to observe constraints imposed upon the use of the resources in the governmental funds. The classifications are as follows:
Nonspendable – Amounts that cannot be spent because they are not in spendable form, or are legally or contractually required to be maintained intact. The “not in spendable form” criterion includes items that are not expected to be converted to cash. It also includes the long-term amount of interfund loans or advances.
Restricted – Amounts constrained to specific purposes by their providers (such as grantors, bondholders, and higher levels of government), through constitutional provisions, or by enabling legislation.
Committed–AmountsconstrainedtospecificpurposesbytheCountyBoardofSupervisors Tobereportedascommitted,amountscannotbeusedforanyotherpurposesunlesstheBoard of Supervisors takes action to remove or change the constraint.
Assigned – Amounts the County intends to use for a specified purpose; intent can be expressed by the governing body or by the County Administrator who has been designated this authority.
Unassigned – Amounts that are available for any purpose; positive amounts are reported onlyinthegeneralfund. In othergovernmentalfundsitisnotappropriatetoreportapositive unassigned fund balance amount. However, in governmental funds other than the general fund, if expenditures incurred for specific purposes exceed the amounts that are restricted, committed, or assigned for those purposes, it may be necessary to report a negative unassigned fund balance in that fund.
TheBoardofSupervisorsestablishesfundbalancecommitmentsbypassageofresolutions. Assigned fund balance is established by the Board of Supervisors through passage of resolutions appropriating funds for specific purposes, as deemed appropriate by the County Administrator, including but not limited to the purchase of capital assets, construction, or debt service.
Restricted Amounts
The County applies restricted resources first when expenditures are incurred for purposes for which either restricted or unrestricted (committed, assigned, and unassigned) amounts are available. Similarly, within unrestricted fund balance, committed amounts are reduced first followed by assigned, and then unassigned amounts when expenditures are incurred for purposes for which amounts in any of the unrestricted fund balance classifications could be used.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
General Fund unassigned fund balance at the close of each fiscal year should be at least 12% of the GeneralFundplusSchooloperatingfundrevenues,excludingtheGeneralFundtransfertotheSchool operating fund. Should the County find it necessary to access these funds in an emergency situation the unassigned fund balance would be allowed to fall below the target described above. Any appropriation which causes unassigned fund balance to drop below 12% will occur only after the County Administrator presents to the Board of Supervisors a plan and timeline for replenishing the balance to a minimum of 12%. The General Fund unassigned fund balance at June 30, 2022 was 17%.
Other governmental funds of the County do not have specified fund balance targets. Recommended levels of committed and/or assigned fund balance will be determined on a case by case basis, based ontheneedsofeachfundandasrecommendedbyofficialsandapprovedbytheBoardofSupervisors.
Encumbrance accounting, under which purchase orders, contracts, and other commitments for the expenditure of monies are recorded in order to reserve that portion of the appropriation, is employed asanextensionofformalbudgetaryintegrationinthegovernmentalfunds. Significantencumbrances as of June 30, 2022 total $1,556,354 in the general fund
The County follows these procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected in the financial statements:
Prior to March 30, the County Administrator submits to the Board a proposed operating and capitalbudgetfortheCountyandSchoolBoardforthefiscalyearcommencingthefollowing July 1. The operating and capital budget includes proposed expenditures and the related financing.
Public hearings are conducted to obtain citizen comments.
Prior to June 30, the budget is legally enacted through passage of an Appropriations Resolution.
The Appropriations Resolution placeslegal restrictions on expenditures at the organizational level. EachorganizationrepresentsamajorCountyfunction,suchasCountyAdministration, Financial and Management Services, Information Management Services, etc. Only the Board can revise the appropriation for each fund and organization. The County Administrator may amend the budget within organizations. Approval by the Board of Supervisors is required for the School Board to transfer budgeted amounts within its major categories, which include administration, instruction, attendance, health, etc.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
The County follows these procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected in the financial statements: (Continued)
Formal budgetary integration is employed as a management control device for the General andCapitalFund. Program andprojectbudgetsareutilizedfortheCapitalFundwherefunds remaining at the end of the year are reappropriated until project completion. The School Fund is integrated only at the level of legal adoption.
All budgets are adopted on a cash basis.
The Board approved additional General Fund appropriations of $29,126,633 during the currentyearprimarilyforpublicsafety,education,specialcommunitydevelopmentprojects, and capital projects.
All budget data presented inthe accompanying financialstatements includesthe original and revised budgets as of June 30.
Below is a reconciliation of the change in fund balances on the budgetary basis to the GAAP basis:
(Continued)
Certain transactions between the County and the School Board are explained here to provide a more informed understanding of the operational relationship of the two entities and how such transactions are presented in the financial statements.
1. The School Board can neither levy taxes nor incur debt under Virginia law. Therefore, the County issues debt “on behalf” of the School Board. The debt and the proceeds are recorded in the County’s governmental activities. The proceeds received are then provided to the School Board for capital expenditures. Any unspent money is reported as deposits and investments in the County’s governmental activities
2. Local governments in Virginia have a “tenancy in common” with the School Board whenever the locality incurs a financial obligation for school property which is payable over more than one year. In order to match the capital assets with the related debt, the legislation permits the primary government to report the portion of the school property related to the financial obligation. When the debt related to a particular capital asset is completely retired, the related capital asset, net of accumulated depreciation, is removed from the primary government’s financial statements and reported in the School Board’s financial statements. The School Board retains authority and responsibility over the operation and control of this property.
3. If all economic resources associated with school activities were reported with the School Board, its total expenditures would be as follows:
Deposits with banks are covered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)and collateralized in accordance with the Virginia Security for Public Deposits Act (the “Act”) Section 2.2-4400 et. seq. of the Code of Virginia Under the Act, banks and savings institutions holding public deposits in excess of the amount insured by the FDIC must pledge collateral to the Commonwealth of Virginia Treasury Board. Financial institutions may choose between two collateralization methodologies and depending upon that choice, will pledge collateral that ranges in the amounts from 50% to 130% of excess deposits. Accordingly, all deposits are considered fully collateralized.
Statutes authorize local governments and other public bodies to invest in obligations of the United States or agencies thereof, obligations of the Commonwealth of Virginia or political subdivisions thereof, obligations of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank), the Asian Development Bank, the African Development Bank, “prime quality” commercial paper, and certain corporate notes; banker’s acceptances, repurchase agreements, the State Treasurer’s Local Government Investment Pool (LGIP), and the State Treasurer’s Non-Arbitrage Program (SNAP).
June 30, 2022 (Continued)
The County has invested bond proceeds subject to rebate of arbitrage earnings in SNAP. SNAP is an open-endmanagementinvestmentcompanyregisteredwiththeSECdesignedtoassistlocalgovernments in complying with the arbitrage rebate requirements of the Tax Reform Act of 1986. This program provides comprehensive investment management, accounting and arbitrage rebate calculation services for proceeds of general obligation, and revenue tax-exempt financing of Virginia counties, cities, and towns.
As of June 30, the County had the following deposits and investments:
Deposits and investments are reflected in the statements as follows:
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
TheCountyhasadoptedaformalinvestmentpolicywherebytheTreasurerinvestsitsfundsinaccordance withVirginialaw. StatestatuterequiresthatobligationsoftheCommonwealthofVirginiaanditspolitical subdivisions have a debt rating of at least AA by Standard and Poor’s (S&P) or equivalent by Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s). Repurchase agreements are collateralized by Treasury or Agency obligationsofwhichthemarketvalueisatleast102%ofthepurchasepriceoftheagreement. Commercial paper must be issued by an entity incorporated in the U.S. and rated at least A-1 by S&P and P-1 by Moody’s. Corporate notes and bonds have a rating of at least AA by S&P and Aa by Moody’s. Money market mutual funds must trade on a constant net asset value and invest solely in securities otherwise eligible for investment under these guidelines.
Although the intent of the County is to diversify its investment portfolio to avoid incurring unreasonable risksregarding(i)securitytype,(ii)individualfinancialinstitutionorissuingentity, and(iii)maturity,the County places no limit on the amount it may invest in any one issuer.
During the year, the County invested only in SNAP, which has a dollar-weighted average portfolio maturity of 90 days, and money market funds which are readily available. The County follows the Code of Virginia regarding investments and interest rate risk.
As required by the Code of Virginia, all security holdings with maturities over 30 days may not be held in safekeeping with the “counterparty” to the investment transaction. As of June 30, all of the County’s investments were held in a bank’s trust department in the County’s name by the County’s designated custodian.
Restricted cash and cash equivalents and restricted investments consist primarily of unused bond proceeds,balancesrequiredtobe maintainedasconditionsofcertainbondinstruments,andamountsheld for others Unused bond proceeds will be used to fund construction commitments as described in Note 8.
(Continued)
Receivables other than lease receivables are aggregated into a single receivables line net of allowances for uncollectible accounts. Details of receivables other than lease receivables are as follows:
Taxes receivable represents the current and past four years of uncollected tax levies for personal property taxes and the current and past nineteen years for uncollected tax levies on real property. The allowance forestimateduncollectibletaxesreceivableisapproximately31%ofthetotaltaxesreceivableandisbased on historical collection rates.
Governmental funds reportdeferred inflows of resources in connection with receivables for revenues that are not considered to be available to liquidate liabilities of the current period. Governmental funds also defer revenue recognition in connection with resources that have been received, but not yet earned At June 30, the components of unavailable/unearned property taxes were as follows:
In fiscal year 2022, the County implemented the guidance in GASB No. 87, Leases, for accounting and reporting of leases that had previously been reported as operating and capital leases. The County, as a lessor, has entered into lease agreements involving a County owned office space and space on a County-owned antenna. The total amount of inflows of resources, including lease revenue, interest revenue, and other lease-related inflows, recognized during the fiscal year was $191,292.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
The County levies real estate taxes on all real property within its boundaries, except those exempted by statute, at a rate enacted by the Board on the assessed value of property (except public utility property) as determined by the Commissioner of Revenue Public utility property is assessed by the Commonwealth. All property is assessed at 100% of fair market value and reassessed every four years as of January 1. The Commissioner of Revenue, by authority of County ordinance, prorates billings for property incomplete as of January 1, but completed during the year.
Real estate taxes are billed in equal semi-annual installments due June 5 and December 5. The taxes receivable balance at June 30 includes amounts not yet received from the January 1 levy (due June 5), less an allowance for uncollectible amounts. Property taxes attach an enforceable lien on property as of January 1. In addition, any uncollected amounts from previous years’ levies are included in the taxes receivable balance. The real estate tax rate for calendar year 2022 is $0.89 per $100 of assessed value.
Personal property tax assessments on tangible business property and all motor vehicles is $2.55 per $100 assessed value. Personal property taxes for the calendar year are due on December 5. Personal property taxes do not create a lien on property.
Due to other governmental units consists of the following:
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Due from other governmental units consists of the following:
Transfers to the County Capital fund from the General fund were to support capital projects including Auburn Park, Garage/Maintenance Facility, major fire and rescue equipment, capital maintenance projects, information technology systems and future unspecified school and county projects
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Capital asset activity for the year was as follows:
(Continued) 31
June 30, 2022
Primary Government (Continued)
Depreciation expense was charged to functions/programs as follows:
The County’s construction commitments as of June 30 were as follows:
In fiscal year 2022, the County implemented the guidance in GASB Statement No. 87, Leases, and recognized right-to-use assets for the value of equipment, buildings, and land leased under long-term contracts. The intangibleright-to-use assets are being amortized over the lease term for eachlease.Terms of the leases are described in Note 9.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Component Unit – School Board
Capital asset activity for the year was as follows:
All depreciation expense in the School Board was charged to the Education function.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Component Unit – School Board (Continued)
In fiscal year 2022, the Schools implemented the guidance in GASB Statement No. 87, Leases, and recognized right to-use assets for the value of equipment and buildings leased under long-term contracts. The intangible right-to-use assets are being amortized over the lease term for each lease. Terms of the leases are described in Note 9.
The following is a summary of changes in long-term liabilities:
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Annual debt service requirements to maturity are as follows:
(Continued)
Details of long-term indebtedness are as follows:
Current year bonds:
OnApril26,2022,theCountyissued$84,690,000inVirginiaPublicSchoolAuthority generalobligation bonds. The net proceeds of $90,000,000 (including an issuance premium of $5,931,167 and net of $621,167issuancecosts),withanaverageinterestrateof3.836%,willbeusedtorenovateChristiansburg High School.
OnMay11,2022,theCountyissued$9,775,000inleaserevenuebonds. Thenetproceedsof$10,000,000 (includinganissuancepremiumof$557,222andnetof$332,222issuancecosts),withanaverageinterest rate of 3.957%, will be used to fund various county capital projects.
For the year ended June 30, 2022, the financial statements include the adoption of GASB Statement No. 87, Leases The primary objective of this statement is to enhance the relevance and consistency of information about governments' leasing activities. This statement establishes a single model for lease accounting based on the principle that leases are financings of the right to use an underlying asset. Under this Statement, a lessee is required to recognize a lease liability and an intangible right-to-use lease asset, and a lessor is required to recognize a lease receivable and a deferred inflow of resources. For additional information, refer to the disclosures below.
(Continued)
On October 1, 2020, the County entered into a 72 month lease as Lessee for the use of an office building An initial lease liability was recorded in the amount of $444,566. As of June 30, 2022, the value of the lease liability is $362,148. The County is required to make monthly fixed payments of $7,046 through September 30, 2023, increasing to $7,257 a month through September 30, 2026. The lease has an interest rate of 0.5773%. The value of the right to use asset as of year end of $359,882 with accumulated amortization of $84,684 is included with Buildings on the Lease Class activities table found below. The County has 1 extension option, for 36 months.
On November 1, 2020, the County entered into a 60 month lease as Lessee for the use of land. An initial lease liability was recorded in the amount of $30,311. As of June 30, 2022, the value of the lease liability is $23,223. The County is required to make monthly fixed payments of $600. The lease has an interest rate of 0.4570%. The value of the right to use asset as of year end of $23,183 with accumulated amortizationof$7,128isincludedwithLandontheLeaseClassactivitiestablefoundbelow.TheCounty has 3 extension options, each for 12 months.
On April 1, 2018, the County entered into an 120 month lease as Lessee for the use of land. An initial lease liability was recorded in the amount of $17,559. As of June 30, 2022, the value of the lease liability is $15,195. The County is required to make monthly fixed payments of $212 through March 31, 2023, increasing 2.5% each year. The lease has an interest rate of 0.8333%. The value of the right to use asset as of year end of $14,955 with accumulated amortization of $2,604 is included with Land on the Lease Class activities table found below. The County has 1 extension option, each for 60 months.
On May 1, 2004, the County entered into a 240 month lease as Lessee for the use of land. An initial lease liability was recorded in the amount of $8,463. As of June 30, 2022, the value of the lease liability is $5,485. The County is required to make annual fixed payments of $3,000. The lease has an interest rate of 0.3147%. The value of the right to use asset as of year end of $5,475 with accumulated amortization of $2,988 is included with Land on the Lease Class activities table found below. After the expiration of the initial term at April 30, 2024, the lease reverts to automatic renewal on a year-to-year basis.
On January 1, 2021, the County entered into a 48 month lease as Lessee for the use of equipment. An initial lease liability was recorded in the amount of $389,981. As of June 30, 2022, the value of the lease liability is $279,228. The County is required to make monthly annual payments of $112,540. The lease has an interest rate of 0.5773%. The value of the right to use asset as of year end of $278,561 with accumulated amortization of $111,420 is included with Equipment on the Lease Class activities table found below.
On September 1, 2021, the County entered into a 48 month lease as Lessee for the use of equipment. An initial lease liability was recorded in the amount of $742,475. As of June 30, 2022, the value of the lease liability is $604,063. The County is required to make monthly annual payments of $187,284. The lease has an interest rate of 0.4570%. The value of the right to use asset as of year end of $603,263 with accumulated amortization of $139,212 is included with Equipment on the Lease Class activities table found below.
June 30, 2022 (Continued)
Leases Payable – County (Continued)
The County also has leases for various equipment for periods expiring December 2022 through March 2027. The County uses its estimated incremental borrowing rate as the discount rate unless an interest rate is explicitly stated in each lease. The value of right to use lease asset balances and related accumulated amortization as of year-end are disclosed inNote 8. The related debt aswell as principaland interest requirements to maturity are disclosed below
Amount of Lease Assets by Major Classes of Underlying Asset
For the year ended June 30, 2022, the financial statements include the adoption of GASB Statement No. 87, Leases The primary objective of this statement is to enhance the relevance and consistency of information about governments' leasing activities. This statement establishes a single model for lease accounting based on the principle that leases are financings of the right to use an underlying asset. Under this Statement, a lessee is required to recognize a lease liability and an intangible right-to-use lease asset, and a lessor is required to recognize a lease receivable and a deferred inflow of resources. For additional information, refer to the disclosures below.
On June 1, 2021, the Schools entered into a 36 month lease as Lessee for the use of a building. An initial leaseliabilitywasrecordedintheamountof$483,126.AsofJune30,2022,thevalueoftheleaseliability is $321,406. The Schools is required to make monthly fixed payments of $13,666. The lease has an interest rate of 0.7270%. The value of the right to use asset as of year end of $483,126 with accumulated amortization of $165,643 is included with Buildings on the Lease Class activities table found below. The Schools has 2 extension options, each for 36 months.
June 30, 2022 (Continued)
June 30, 2022
On September 1, 2021, the Schools entered into a 12 month lease as Lessee for the use of a building. An initial lease liability was recorded in the amount of $32,944. As of June 30, 2022, the value of the lease liability is $5,497. The Schools is required to make monthly fixed payments of $2,750. The lease has an interest rate of 0.3710%. The value of the right to use asset as of year end of $32,944 with accumulated amortization of $27,453 is included with Buildings on the Lease Class activities table found below. The Schools has 12 extension options, each for 1 month.
The Schools also have leases for various equipment for periods expiring January 2023 through December 2026. The Schools uses its estimated incremental borrowing rate as the discount rate unless an interest rate is explicitly stated in each lease. The value of right to use lease asset balances and related accumulated amortization as of year-end are disclosed inNote 8. The related debt aswell as principaland interest requirements to maturity are disclosed below. Amount
Principal and Interest Requirements to Maturity
The County maintains the Thompson and Mid County Landfills, which were closed in 1993 and 1997, respectively. State and federal laws and regulations required the County to perform certain maintenance and monitoring functions at the site for ten years after closure. Certain contaminants and a high concentration of gas were detected at the landfills in prior years; therefore, the Department of Environmental Quality required an additional ten-year monitoring period. During 2013, the monitoring period was extended for another ten years The $1,183,180 reported post-closure care liability represents what it would cost to perform all post-closure care in 2022 Actual costs may change due to inflation, deflation, changes in technology, or changes in regulations. The County intends to fund these costs from general revenues. The County uses the financial test method of demonstrating assurance for post-closure care cost.
(Continued)
Allfull-time,salariedpermanentemployeesoftheCounty,(the“PoliticalSubdivision”)areautomatically covered by the VRS Retirement Plan upon employment. This multi-employer agent plan is administered by the Virginia Retirement System (the System) along with plans for other employer groups in the CommonwealthofVirginia. Membersearnonemonthofservicecreditforeachmonththeyareemployed and for which they and their employer pay contributions to VRS. Members are eligible to purchase prior service, based on specific criteria as defined in the Code of Virginia, as amended. Eligible prior service that may be purchased includes prior public service, active military service, certain periods of leave, and previously refunded service.
The System administers three different benefit structures for covered employees – Plan 1, Plan 2, and Hybrid. Each of these benefit structures has a different eligibility criteria. The specific information for each plan and the eligibility for covered groups within each plan are available at
https://www.varetire.org/members/benefits/defined-benefit/plan1.asp,
https://www.varetire.org/members/benefits/defined-benefit/plan2.asp,
https://www.varetirement.org/hybrid.html
June 30, 2022 (Continued)
June 30, 2022
Primary Government – County (Continued)
Contributions
The contribution requirement for active employees is governed by §51.1-145 of the Code of Virginia, as amended, but may be impacted as a result of funding options provided to political subdivisions by the Virginia General Assembly. Employees are required to contribute 5.00% of their compensation toward their retirement.
The political subdivision’s contractually required contribution rate for the year ended June 30, 2022 was 12.44% of covered employee compensation. This rate was based on an actuarially determined rate from an actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2019
This rate, when combined with employee contributions, was expected to finance the costs of benefits earnedbyemployeesduringtheyear,withanadditionalamounttofinanceanyunfundedaccruedliability. Contributions to the pension plan from the political subdivision were $2,358,265 and $2,391,422 for the years ended June 30, 2022 and June 30, 2021, respectively.
The net pension liability is calculated separately for each employer and represents that particular employer’s total pension liability determined in accordance with GASB Statement No. 68, less that employer’s fiduciary net position. For political subdivisions, the net pension liability was measured as of June 30, 2021. The total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation performed as of June 30, 2020 rolled forward to the measurement date of June 30, 2021.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Primary Government – County (Continued)
Actuarial Assumptions
The total pension liability for General Employees and Public Safety employees with Hazardous Duty Benefits in the Political Subdivision’s Retirement Plan was based on an actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2020, using the Entry Age Normal actuarial cost method and the following assumptions, applied to all periods included in the measurement and rolled forward to the measurement date of June 30, 2021
Mortality rates: General employees – 15 to 20% of deaths are assumed to be service related. Public SafetyEmployees– 45%to 70%ofdeathsareassumedtobeservicerelated. Mortalityisprojectedusing the applicable Pub-2010 Mortality Table with various set backs or set forwards for both males and females.
The actuarial assumptions used in the June 30, 2019 valuation were based on the results of an actuarial experience study for the period from July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2016, except the change in the discount rate, which was based on VRS Board action effective as of July 1, 2019. Changes to the actuarial assumptions as a result of the experience study are as follows:
General Employees – Largest 10 – Non-Hazardous Duty and All Others (Non 10 Largest): Updated mortalitytable;adjustedretirementrates,adjustedwithdrawalratestobetterfitexperienceateachyear age and service through 9 years of service; no change to disability rates, no change to salary scale, no change to line of duty disability; and no change to discount rate
Public Safety Employees – Largest 10 – Hazardous Duty and All Others (Non 10 Largest): Updated mortality table; adjusted retirement rate to better fit experience and increased final retirement age to 70; adjusted rates of withdrawal; no change to disability rates; no changes to salary scale; no change to line of duty disability; and no change to discount rate
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
The long-term expected rate of return on pension System investments was determined using a log-normal distribution analysis in which best-estimate ranges of expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of pension System investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class. These ranges are combined to produce the long-term expected rate of return by weighting the expected future real rates of return by the target asset allocation percentage and by adding expected inflation. The target asset allocation and best estimate of arithmetic real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table:
*Expected arithmetic nominal return
* The above allocation provides for a one-year return of 7.39%. However, one-year returns do not take into account the volatility present in each of the asset classes. In setting the long-term expected rate of return for the system, stochastic projections are employed to model future returns under various economic conditions. The results provide a range of returns over various time periods that ultimately provide a median return of 6.94%, including expected inflationof2.50%. OnOctober10,2019,the VRSBoardelectedalong-termrateof6.75%which is roughly at the 40th percentile of expected long-term results of the VRS fund asset allocation at that time, providing a median return of 7.11%, including expected inflation of 2.50%.
(Continued)
Primary Government – County (Continued)
The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 6.75%. The projection of cash flows usedtodeterminethediscountrateassumedthatSystem membercontributionswillbe madepertheVRS Statutes and the employer contributions will be made in accordance with the VRS funding policy at rates equal to the difference between actuarially determined contribution rates adopted by the VRS Board of Trustees and the member rate. Consistent with the phased-in funding provided by the General Assembly forstateandteacheremployercontributions,politicalsubdivisionswerealsoprovidedwithanopportunity to use an alternate employer contribution rate. For the year ended June 30, 2021, the alternate rate was the actuarially determined employer contribution rate used in the FY 2012 or 100% of the actuarially determined employer contribution rate from the June 30, 2017 actuarial valuations, whichever is greater. From July 1, 2021 on, participating employers are assumed to continue to contribute 100% of the actuarially determined contribution rates. Based on those assumptions, the pension plan’s fiduciary net position was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current active and inactiveemployees. Thereforethelong-termexpectedrateofreturnwasappliedtoallperiodsofprojected benefit payments to determine the total pension liability.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Primary Government – County (Continued)
The following presents the net pension liability of the political subdivision using the discount rate of 6.75%,aswellaswhatthepoliticalsubdivision’snetpensionliabilitywouldbeifit werecalculatedusing a discount rate that is one percentage point lower (5.75%) or one percentage point higher
than the current rate:
For the year ended June 30, 2022, the political subdivision recognized pension expense of $2,286,839. At June 30, 2022, the political subdivision reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources:
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Note 11. Defined Benefit Pension Plans (Continued)
Primary Government – County (Continued)
Pension Expense and Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions (Continued)
The $2,358,265 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from the political subdivision’s contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the NetPensionLiabilityinthefiscalyearendingJune30,2023 Otheramountsreportedasdeferredoutflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows:
Pension Plan Data
Information about the VRS Political Subdivision Retirement Plans is also available in the separately issued VRS 2021 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (Annual Report). A copy of the 2021 VRS Annual Report may be downloaded from the VRS website at http://www.varetire.org/Pdf/Publications/2021-annual-report.pdf, or by writing to the System’s Chief Financial Officer at P.O. Box 2500, Richmond, VA, 23218-2500.
Component Unit – Public Service Authority
Plan Description
All full-time, salaried permanent employees of the Montgomery County Public Service Authority, (the“ComponentUnit”)areautomaticallycoveredbyVRSRetirementPlanuponemployment. Thisplan is an agent multiple-employer plan administered by the Virginia Retirement System (the System) along with plans for other employer groups in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Plan participants are covered under three different benefit structures for covered employees – Plan 1, Plan 2, and Hybrid. The plan provisions and features of the plans, as well as all actuarial assumptions, are substantially the recap as those described for the County.
(Continued)
Component Unit – Public Service Authority (Continued)
Contributions
The component unit’s contractually required contribution rate for the year ended June 30, 2022 was 12.44% of covered employee compensation. This rate was based on an actuarially determined rate from an actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2019
This rate, when combined with employee contributions, was expected to finance the costs of benefits earnedbyemployeesduringtheyear,withanadditionalamounttofinanceanyunfundedaccruedliability. Contributions to the pension plan from the component unit were $115,526 and $113,209 for the years ended June 30, 2022 and June 30, 2021, respectively.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Component Unit – Public Service Authority (Continued)
The following presents the net pension liability of the component unit using the discount rate of 6.75%, as well as what the component unit’s net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is one percentage point lower (5.75%) or one percentage point higher (7.75%) than the current rate:
For the year ended June 30, 2022, the political subdivision recognized pension expense of $112,027. At June 30, 2022, the component unit reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources:
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Component Unit – Public Service Authority (Continued)
Pension Expense and Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions (Continued)
The$115,526reportedasdeferredoutflowsofresourcesrelatedtopensionsresultingfromthecomponent unit’s contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the Net Pension Liability in the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023 Other amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows:
All full-time, salaried permanent non-professional employees (non-teachers) of the Montgomery County Public Schools, (the “School division”) are automatically covered by the VRS Retirement Plan upon employment. This multi-employer agent plan is administered by the Virginia Retirement System (the System) along with plans for other employer groups in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Members earnonemonthofservicecreditforeachmonththeyare employedandforwhichtheyandtheiremployer pay contributions to VRS. Members are eligible to purchase prior service, based on specific criteria as defined in the Code of Virginia, as amended. Eligible prior service that may be purchased includes prior public service, active military service, certain periods of leave, and previously refunded service.
The System administers three different benefit structures for covered employees – Plan 1, Plan 2, and Hybrid. The plan provisions and features of the plans, as well as all actuarial assumptions, are substantially the same as those described for the County.
(Continued)
The school division’s contractually required contribution rate for the year ended June 30, 2022 was 10.31% of covered employee compensation. This rate was based on an actuarially determined rate from an actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2019
Contributions to the pension plan from the school division were $458,903 and $471,007 for the years ended June 30, 2022 and June 30, 2021, respectively.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Note 11. Defined Benefit Pension Plans (Continued)
School Nonprofessionals (Continued)
Changes in Net Pension Liability
The following presents the net pension liability of the school division using the discount rate of 6.75%, as well as what the net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is one percentage point lower (5.75%) or one percentage point higher (7.75%) than the current rate:
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
For the year ended June 30, 2022, the school division recognized pension expense of $(133,111) At June 30, 2022, the school division reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources:
The $458,903 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from the school division’s contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year ending June 30, 2023 Other amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows:
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Information about the VRS Political Subdivision Retirement Plans is also available in the separately issued VRS 2021 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (Annual Report) A copy of the 2021 VRS report may be downloaded from the VRS website at http://www.varetire.org/Pdf/Publications/2021annual-report.pdf, or by writing to the System’s Chief Financial Officer at P.O. Box 2500, Richmond, VA, 23218-2500.
All full-time, salaried permanent (professional) employees of Virginia public school divisions, including Montgomery County Public Schools, (the “School Division”), are automatically covered by the VRS Teacher Retirement Plan upon employment. This multiple employer, cost sharing plan is administered by the Virginia Retirement System (the System) along with plans for other employer groups in the CommonwealthofVirginia.Membersearnonemonthofservicecreditforeachmonththeyareemployed and for which they and their employer pay contributions to VRS. Members are eligible to purchase prior service, based on specific criteria as defined in the Code of Virginia, as amended. Eligible prior service that may be purchased includes prior public service, active military service, certain periods of leave, and previously refunded service.
The System administers three different benefit structures for covered employees in the VRS Teacher Retirement Plan – Plan 1, Plan 2, and Hybrid. The provisions and features of the plans, as well as all actuarial assumptions, are substantially the same as those described for the County.
The contribution requirement for active employees is governed by §51.1-145 of the Code of Virginia, as amended,but may beimpactedasaresultoffundingprovidedtoschooldivisionsbytheVirginiaGeneral Assembly. Employees are required to contribute 5.00% of their compensation toward their retirement. Each school division’s contractually required contribution rate for the year ended June 30, 2022 was 16.62% of covered employee compensation. This rate was based on an actuarially determined rate from an actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2019 The actuarially determined rate, when combined with employeecontributions,wasexpectedtofinancethecostsofbenefitsearnedbyemployeeduringtheyear, with an additional amount to finance any unfunded accrued liability. Contributions to the pension plan from the school division were $10,403,180 and $9,462,900 for the years ended June 30, 2022 and June 30, 2021, respectively.
InJune2021,theCommonwealthmadeaspecialcontributionofapproximately$61.3 milliontotheVRS Teacher Employee Plan. This special payment was authorized by a budget amendment included in Chapter 552 of the 2021 Appropriation Act, and is classified as a non-employer contribution.
(Continued)
At June 30, 2022, the school division reported a liability of $51,982,812 for its proportionate share of the Net Pension Liability. The Net Pension Liability was measured as ofJune 30, 2021 and the total pension liability used to calculate the Net Pension Liability was determined by an actuarial valuation performed as of June 30, 2020, and rolled forward to the measurement date of June 30, 2021. The school division’s proportion of the Net Pension Liability was based on the school division’s actuarially determined employer contributions to the pension plan for the year ended June 30, 2021 relative to the total of the actuarially determined employer contributions for all participating employers. At June 30, 2021, the school division’s proportion was 0.6696% as compared to 0.6610% at June 30, 2020
For the year ended June 30, 2022, the school division recognized pension expense of $2,081,630. Since there was a change in proportionate share between measurement dates, a portion of the pension expense was related to deferred amounts from changes in proportion and from differences between employer contributions and the proportionate share of employer contributions.
At June 30, 2022, the school division reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources:
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Note 11. Defined Benefit Pension Plans (Continued)
Teacher Cost Sharing Plan (Continued)
Pension Liabilities, Pension Expense, and Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions (Continued)
The $10,403,180 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from the school division’s contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the Net Pension Liability in the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023 Other amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows:
The net pension liability (NPL) is calculated separately for each system and represents that particular system’stotalpensionliabilitydeterminedinaccordancewithGASBStatementNo.67,lessthatsystem’s fiduciary net position. As of June 30, 2021, NPL amounts for the VRS Teacher Employee Retirement Plan is as follows (amounts expressed in thousands):
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
The total pension liability is calculated by the System’s actuary, and each plan’s fiduciary net position is reportedintheSystem’sfinancialstatements.Thenetpensionliabilityisdisclosedinaccordancewiththe requirements of GASB Statement No. 67 in the System’s notes to the financial statements and required supplementary information.
The following presents the school division’s proportionate share of the net pension liability of the school division using the discount rate of 6.75%, as well as what the school division’s proportionate share of the net pensionliability would be if it were calculated using a discountratethatis one percentage point lower (5.75%) or one percentage point higher (7.75%) than the current rate:
Detailed information about the VRS Teacher Retirement Plan’s Fiduciary Net Position is available in the separately issued VRS 2021 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report. A copy of the 2021 VRS report may be downloaded from the VRS website at http://www.varetire.org/Pdf/Publications/2021-annualreport.pdf, or by writing to the System’s Chief Financial Officer at P.O. Box 2500, Richmond, VA, 23218-2500.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
A summary of the pension-related financial statement elements is as follows:
Local Plans – County and Public Service Authority
Plan Description and Benefits Provided
The County and Public Service Authority provide postemployment medical and dental benefits to its retirees and their eligible dependents who elect to stay in the plans. At retirement, retirees may stay in one of three health plans with an additional choice of staying in one of two dental plans and can continue coverage under all the benefits until becoming eligible for Medicare or death, whichever comes first, under the single-employer plan. The retiree pays the premium for these benefits. The County and Public Service Authority may change, add, or delete benefits (including contributions required of retired employees) as deemed appropriate.
Participants are eligible for the plan at age 50 if they have completed ten years of service, or at age 55 if they have completed five years of service. Retiring employees must have been permanent active employees and have coverage in effect when they retire.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Note 13. Other Postemployment Benefits Liability (Continued)
Local Plans – County and Public Service Authority (Continued)
Employees Covered by Benefit Terms
As of the June 30, 2021 actuarial valuation, the following employees were covered by the benefit terms of the plan:
The County and Public Service Authority’s total OPEB liability of $2,560,041 and $262,162, respectively, were measured as of June 30, 2022 and were determined based on an actuarial valuation performed as of July 1, 2021.
The total OPEB liability was determined using the following assumptions, applied to all periods included in the measurement, unless otherwise specified:
TheactuarialassumptionsusedintheJuly1,2021valuationwerebasedontheresultsofVRSexperience studies for the period from July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2016
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Local Plans – County and Public Service Authority (Continued)
Actuarial Assumptions and Other Inputs (Continued)
There were no changes in benefit terms in the current year.
Changes in assumptions and other inputs since the July 1, 2019 valuation include:
The healthcare trend assumption was updated. These rates are consistent with information from the Getzen Trend Mode, Milliman’s Health Cost Guidelines, and actuarial judgement.
Changes in the Total OPEB Liability
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Note 13. Other Postemployment Benefits Liability (Continued)
Local Plans – County and Public Service Authority (Continued) Changes
The following presents the total OPEB liability of the County and Public Service Authority, as well as what the County and Public Service Authority’s total OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is one percentage point lower (1.16%) or one percentage point higher (3.16%) than the current discount rate:
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Note 13. Other Postemployment Benefits Liability (Continued)
Local Plans – County and Public Service Authority (Continued)
Sensitivity of the Total OPEB Liability to Changes in the Healthcare Cost Trend Rates
The following presents the total OPEB liability of the County and the Public Service Authority, as well as what the County and Public Service Authority’s total OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using healthcare cost trend rates that are one percentage point lower or one percentage point higher than the current healthcare cost trend rates:
For the year ended June 30, 2022, the County and Public Service Authorityrecognized OPEB expense of $198,852 and $20,364, respectively At June 30, 2022, the political subdivision reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB from the following sources:
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Note 13. Other Postemployment Benefits Liability (Continued)
Local Plans – County and Public Service Authority (Continued)
OPEB Expense and Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to OPEB (Continued)
Other amounts reported as deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB will be recognized in OPEB expense as follows:
(Continued)
The School Board provides postemployment medical and dental benefits to its retirees and their eligible dependents who elect to stay in the plans. At retirement, retirees may stay in one of three health plans with an additional choice of staying in one of two dental plans and can continue coverage under all the benefits until becoming eligible for Medicare or death, whichever comes first, under a single-employer plan. The retiree pays the premium for these benefits. The School Board may change, add, or delete benefits (including contributions required of retired employees) as deemed appropriate.
Participants are eligible for the plan at age 50 if they have completed ten years of service, or at age 55 if they have completed five years of service. Retiring employees must have been permanent active employees and have coverage in effect when they retire.
RetireeswhoparticipateintheRetireeIncentiveHealthInsurancePlanreceiveasubsidyfromtheSchools equal to 100% of the retiree-only premium cost for the HMO medical plan offering. If the retiree elects another medical plan offering (or tier of coverage), they are responsible for 100% of their premium cost inexcessoftheSchools-providedsubsidy.Planbenefitsareprovidedfor4yearsoruntiltheretireeattains age 65, whichever occurs first.
Plan participants are required to fulfill 35 days of work before June 1 in each year they participate. Retirees who do not participate in the Retiree Incentive Health Insurance Plan are responsible for 100% of their premium cost.
As of the June 30, 2021 actuarial valuation, the following employees were covered by the benefit terms of the plan:
The School Board’s total OPEB liability of $8,307,848 was measured as of June 30, 2022 and was determined based on an actuarial valuation performed as of July 1, 2021
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Local Plans – School Board (Continued)
Actuarial Assumptions and Other Inputs
The total OPEB liability was determined using the following assumptions, applied to all periods included in the measurement, unless otherwise specified:
The actuarial assumptions used in the July 1, 2021 valuation were based on the results of an actuarial experience study for the period from July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2016.
There were no changes in benefit terms in the current year.
Changes in assumptions and other inputs since the July 1, 2019 valuation include:
The healthcare trend assumption was updated. These rates are consistent with information from the Getzen Trend Mode, Milliman’s Health Cost Guidelines, and actuarial judgement.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Local Plans – School Board (Continued)
OPEB
The following presents the total OPEB liability of the School Board, as well as what the School Board’s total OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using a discountratethatis one percentage pointlower (2.54%) or one percentage point higher (4.54%) than the current discount rate:
The following presents the total OPEB liability of the School Board, as well as what the School Board’s totalOPEBliabilitywouldbeifitwerecalculatedusinghealthcarecosttrendratesthatareonepercentage point lower, or one percentage point higher than the current healthcare cost trend rates:
For the year ended June 30, 2022, the School Board recognized OPEB expense of $980,932. At June 30, 2022, the political subdivision reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB from the following sources:
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Note 13. Other Postemployment Benefits Liability (Continued)
Local Plans – School Board (Continued)
OPEB Expense and Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to OPEB (Continued)
Amounts reported as deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB will be recognized in OPEB expense as follows:
In addition to their participation in the pension plans offered through the Virginia Retirement System (VRS), the County and Public Service Authority also participate in various cost-sharing and agent multi-employer other postemployment benefit plans, described as follows.
Group Life Insurance Program
All full-time teachers and employees of political subdivisions are automatically covered by the VRS Group Life Insurance (GLI) Program upon employment.
In addition to the Basic Group Life Insurance Benefit, members are also eligible to elect additional coverage for themselves as well as a spouse or dependent children through the Optional Group Life Insurance Program. For members who elect the optional group life insurance coverage, the insurer bills employers directly for the premiums. Employers deduct these premiums from members’ paychecks and pay the premiums to the insurer. Since this is a separate and fully insured program, it is not included as part of the GLI Program OPEB.
Specific information for the GLI is available at https://www.varetire.org/members/benefits/lifeinsurance/basic-group-life-insurance.asp
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Virginia Retirement System Plans – County and Public Service Authority (Continued)
Contributions
Contributions to the VRS OPEB programs were based on actuarially determined rates from actuarial valuations as of June 30, 2019. The actuarially determined rates were expected to finance the cost of benefits earned by employees during the year, with an additional amount to fund any unfunded accrued liability. Specific details related to the contributions for the VRS OPEB programs are as follows:
Group Life Insurance Program
Governed by:
Code of Virginia 51.1-506 and 51.1-508 and may be impacted as a result of funding provided to school divisions and governmental agencies by the Virginia General Assembly.
Total rate:
1.34% of covered employee compensation. Rate allocated 60/40; 0.80% employee and 0.54% employer. Employers may elect to pay all or part of the employee contribution.
June 30, 2022 Contribution – County $ 107,556
June 30, 2021 Contribution – County $ 103,949
June 30, 2022 Contribution – Public Service Authority $ 5,150
June 30, 2021 Contribution – Public Service Authority $ 4,977
OPEB Liabilities, OPEB Expense and Deferred Inflows and Outflows of Resources Related to OPEB
ThenetOPEBliabilitiesweremeasuredasofJune30,2021andthetotalOPEBliabilitiesusedtocalculate the net OPEB liabilities was determined by an actuarial valuation performed as of June 30, 2020 and rolled forward to the measurement date of June 30, 2021 The covered employer’s proportion of the net OPEB liabilities, were based on the covered employer’s actuarially determined employer contributions for the year ended June 30, 2021 relative to the total of the actuarially determined employer contributions for all participating employers.
Group Life Insurance Program – County
June 30, 2022 proportionate share of liability $ 1,085,509
June 30, 2021 proportion .09770 %
June 30, 2020 proportion .09663 %
June 30, 2022 expense $ 45,685
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Note 13. Other Postemployment Benefits Liability (Continued)
Virginia Retirement System Plans – County and Public Service Authority (Continued)
OPEB Liabilities, OPEB Expense and Deferred Inflows and Outflows of Resources Related to OPEB (Continued)
Since there was a change in proportionate share between measurement dates, a portion of the OPEB expense above was related to deferred amount from changes in proportion.
At June 30, 2022, the County and Public Service Authority reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB from the following sources.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Note 13. Other Postemployment Benefits Liability (Continued)
Virginia Retirement System Plans – County and Public Service Authority (Continued)
OPEB Liabilities, OPEB Expense and Deferred Inflows and Outflows of Resources Related to OPEB (Continued)
Group Life Insurance Program – Public Service Authority
The deferred outflows of resources related to OPEB resulting from the County and Public Service Authority’s contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the Net OPEB Liabilityin thefiscal year endingJune 30, 2023. Other amounts reportedas deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB will be recognized in OPEB expense in future reporting periods as follows:
Program – County
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Note 13. Other Postemployment Benefits Liability (Continued)
Virginia Retirement System Plans – County and Public Service Authority (Continued)
OPEB Liabilities, OPEB Expense and Deferred Inflows and Outflows of Resources Related to OPEB (Continued)
Group
Program – Public Service Authority
The total OPEB liability was determined using the following assumptions based on an actuarial valuation date of June 30, 2020, applied to all periods included in the measurement and rolled forward to the measurement date of June 30, 2021:
Mortality rates used for the various VRS OPEB plans are the same as those used for the actuarial valuations of the VRS pension plans. The mortality rates are discussed in detail at Note 11.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Virginia Retirement System Plans – County and Public Service Authority (Continued)
The net OPEB liabilities represent each program’s total OPEB liability determined in accordance with GASB Statement No. 74, less the associated fiduciary net position. As of the measurement date of June 30, 2021, net OPEB liability amounts for the various VRS OPEB programs are as follows (amounts expressed in thousands):
The total liability is calculated by the VRS actuary and each plan’s fiduciary net position is reported in the VRS financial statements. The net OPEB liability is disclosed in accordance with the requirements of GASB Statement No. 74 in the VRS notes to the financial statements and required supplementary information.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Virginia Retirement System Plans – County and Public Service Authority (Continued)
Group Life Insurance
The long-term expected rate of return on VRS investments was determined using a log-normal distribution analysis in which best-estimate ranges of expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of OPEB investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class. These ranges are combined to produce the long-term expected rate of return by weighting the expected future real rates of return by the target asset allocation percentage and by adding expected inflation. Thetargetassetallocationandbestestimateofarithmeticrealratesofreturnforeachmajor asset class are summarized in the following table:
*Expected arithmetic nominal return
* The above allocation provides for a one-year return of 7.39%. However, one-year returns do not take into account the volatility present in each of the asset classes. In setting the long-term expected rate of return for the system, stochastic projections are employed to model future returns under various economic conditions. The results provide a range of returns over various time periods that ultimately provide a median return of 6.94%, including expected inflation of 2.50%.OnOctober10,2019,theVRSBoardelectedalong-termrateof6.75%whichisroughly at the 40th percentile of expected long-term results of the VRS fund asset allocation at that time, providing a median return of 7.11%, including inflation of 2.50%.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Virginia Retirement System Plans – County and Public Service Authority (Continued)
The discount rate used to measure the GLI OPEB liabilities was 6.75%. The projection of cash flows usedtodeterminethediscountrateassumedthatSystem membercontributionswillbe madepertheVRS Guidance and the employer contributions will be made in accordance with the VRS funding policy at rates equalto the differencebetween actuarially determined contributionrates adopted by the VRS Board of Trustees and the member rate. Through the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020, the rate contributed by the employer for the OPEB liabilities will be subject to the portion of the VRS Board-certified rates that arefundedbytheVirginiaGeneralAssembly. FromJuly1,2020on,participatingemployersareassumed to contribute 100% of the actuarially determined contribution rates. Based on those assumptions, the OPEB plans’ fiduciary net position was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current active and inactive employees. Therefore the long-term expected rate of return was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total OPEB liability.
The following presents the net OPEB liabilities of the County, as well as what the County’s net OPEB liabilities would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is one percentage point lower (5.75% GLI) or one percentage point higher (7.75% GLI) than the current discount rate:
Information about the various VRS OPEB plan fiduciary net position is available in the separately issued VRS 2021 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (Annual report). A copy of the 2021 VRS Annual Report may be downloaded from the VRS website at http://www.varetire.org/Pdf/Publications/2021-annual-report.pdf, or by writing to the System’s Chief Financial Officer at P.O. Box 2500, Richmond, VA, 23218-2500.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
In addition to their participation in the pension plans offered through the Virginia Retirement System (VRS), the School Board also participates in various cost-sharing and agent multi-employer other postemployment benefit plans, described as follows.
Group Life Insurance Program
All full-time teachers and employees of political subdivisions are automatically covered by the VRS Group Life Insurance (GLI) Program upon employment.
In addition to the Basic Group Life Insurance Benefit, members are also eligible to elect additional coverage for themselves as well as a spouse or dependent children through the Optional Group Life Insurance Program. For members who elect the optional group life insurance coverage, the insurer bills employers directly for the premiums. Employers deduct these premiums from members’ paychecks and pay the premiums to the insurer. Since this is a separate and fully insured program, it is not included as part of the GLI Program OPEB.
Specific information for the GLI is available at https://www.varetire.org/members/benefits/lifeinsurance/basic-group-life-insurance.asp
All full time, salaried permanent (professional) employees of public school divisions are automatically covered by the VRS Teacher Employee Health Insurance Credit (HIC) Program. Members earn one month of service credit toward the benefit for each month they are employed and for which their employer pays contributions to VRS. The health insurance credit is a tax-free reimbursement in an amount set by the General Assembly for each year of service credit against qualified health insurance premiums retirees pay for single coverage, excluding any portion covering the spouse or dependents. The credit cannot exceed the amount of the premiums and ends upon the retiree’s death.
Specific information about the Teacher HIC is available at https://www.varetire.org/retirees/insurance/healthinscredit/index.asp
The GLI and Teacher HIC are administered by the VRS along with pensions and other OPEB plans, for public employer groups in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Both of these plans are considered multiple employer, cost sharing plans.
(Continued)
The General Employee Health Insurance Credit Program (HIC) is available for all full time, salaried employees of local government entities other than teachers. The General Employee HICprovides all thesamebenefitsastheTeacherHIC,exceptthatthisplanisconsideredamulti-employeragentplan.
As of the June 30, 2020 actuarial valuation, the following employees were covered by the benefit terms of the General Employee Health Insurance Credit Program:
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Note 13. Other Postemployment Benefits Liability (Continued)
Virginia Retirement System Plans – School Board (Continued)
Contributions
Contributions to the VRS OPEB programs were based on actuarially determined rates from actuarial valuations as of June 30, 2020 (General Employee HIC Program) and June 30, 2019 (GLI and Teacher HIC). The actuarially determined rates were expectedto financethe cost of benefits earned by employees duringtheyear,withanadditionalamounttofundanyunfundedaccruedliability. Specificdetailsrelated to the contributions for the VRS OPEB programs are as follows:
Group Life Insurance Program
Governed by:
Code of Virginia 51.1-506 and 51.1-508 and may be impacted as a result of funding provided to school divisions and governmental agencies by the Virginia General Assembly.
Total rate: 1.34% of covered employee compensation. Rate allocated 60/40; 0.80% employee and 0.55% employer. Employers may elect to pay all or part of the employee contribution.
June 30, 2022 Contribution – Professionals $ 352,207
June 30, 2021 Contribution – Professionals $ 319,395
June 30, 2022 Contribution – Nonprofessionals $ 26,034
June 30, 2021 Contribution – Nonprofessionals $ 26,619
Teacher Health Insurance Credit Program
Governed by: Code of Virginia 51.1-1401(E) and may be impacted as a result of funding provided to school divisions by the Virginia General Assembly.
Total rate: 1.21% of covered employee compensation.
June 30, 2022 Contribution $ 788,422
June 30, 2021 Contribution $ 714,653
General Employee Health Insurance Credit Program
Governed by: Code of Virginia 51.1-1402(E) and may be impacted as a result of funding provided to governmental agencies by the Virginia General Assembly.
Total rate: 0.66% of covered employee compensation.
June 30, 2022 Contribution $31,801
June 30, 2021 Contribution $32,564
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Note 13. Other Postemployment Benefits Liability (Continued)
Virginia Retirement System Plans – School Board (Continued)
OPEB Liabilities, OPEB Expense and Deferred Inflows and Outflows of Resources Related to OPEB
ThenetOPEBliabilitiesweremeasuredasofJune30,2021andthetotalOPEBliabilitiesusedtocalculate the net OPEB liabilities was determined by an actuarial valuation performed as of June 30, 2020 and rolled forward to the measurement date of June 30, 2021. The covered employer’s proportion of the net OPEBliabilitieswerebasedonthecoveredemployer’sactuariallydeterminedemployercontributionsfor the year ended June 30, 2021 relative to the total of the actuarially determined employer contributions for all participating employers.
Group Life Insurance Program – Professionals
June
June
June
June
Group Life Insurance Program – Non-professionals
June
June
June
Since there was a change in proportionate share between measurement dates, a portion of the OPEB expense above was related to deferred amount from changes in proportion.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Note 13. Other Postemployment Benefits Liability (Continued)
Virginia Retirement System Plans – School Board (Continued)
OPEB Liabilities, OPEB Expense and Deferred Inflows and Outflows of Resources Related to OPEB (Continued)
General Employee Health Insurance Credit Program
Changes in net OPEB liability of the General Employee Health Insurance Credit Program were as follows:
Inaddition,fortheyearendedJune30,2021,theSchoolBoardrecognizedOPEBexpenseof$31,881 related to the General Employee Health Insurance Credit Program.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Note 13. Other Postemployment Benefits Liability (Continued) Virginia
(Continued)
Expense and Deferred Inflows and Outflows of Resources Related to OPEB (Continued)
At June 30, 2022, the School Board reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB from the following sources.
(Continued)
Note 13. Other Postemployment Benefits Liability (Continued)
System Plans – School Board (Continued)
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Note 13. Other Postemployment Benefits Liability (Continued)
Virginia Retirement System Plans – School Board (Continued)
OPEB Liabilities, OPEB Expense and Deferred Inflows and Outflows of Resources Related to OPEB (Continued)
The deferred outflows of resources related to OPEB resulting from the School Board’s contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the Net OPEB Liability in the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB will be recognized in OPEB expense in future reporting periods as follows: Group Life Insurance Program –
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Note 13. Other Postemployment Benefits Liability (Continued)
Virginia Retirement System Plans – School Board (Continued)
OPEB Liabilities, OPEB Expense and Deferred Inflows and Outflows of Resources Related to OPEB (Continued)
Teacher Health Insurance Credit Program
General Employee Health Insurance Credit Program
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Virginia Retirement System Plans – School Board (Continued)
Actuarial Assumptions and Other Inputs
The total OPEB liability was determined using the following assumptions based on an actuarial valuation date of June 30, 2020, applied to all periods included in the measurement and rolled forward to the measurement date of June 30, 2021:
cost trend rates:
Investment rate of return, net of expenses, including inflation
Mortality rates used for the various VRS OPEB plans are the same as those used for the actuarial valuations of the VRS pension plans. The mortality rates are discussed in detail at Note 11
The net OPEB liabilities represent each program’s total OPEB liability determined in accordance with GASB Statement No. 74, less the associated fiduciary net position. As of June 30, 2021, net OPEB liability amounts for the various VRS OPEB programs are as follows (amounts expressed in thousands):
The total liability is calculated by the VRS actuary and each plan’s fiduciary net position is reported in the VRS financial statements. The net OPEB liability is disclosed in accordance with the requirements of GASB Statement No. 74 in the VRS notes to the financial statements and required supplementary information.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Note 13. Other Postemployment Benefits Liability (Continued)
Virginia Retirement System Plans – School Board (Continued)
Group Life Insurance and Health Insurance Credit Programs
The long-term expected rate of return on VRS investments was determined using a log-normal distribution analysis in which best-estimate ranges of expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of OPEB investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class. These ranges are combined to produce the long-term expected rate of return by weighting the expected future real rates of return by the target asset allocation percentage and by adding expected inflation. Thetargetassetallocationandbestestimateofarithmeticrealratesofreturnforeachmajor asset class are summarized in the following table:
*Expected arithmetic nominal return
* The above allocation provides for a one-year return of 7.39%. However, one-year returns do not take into account the volatility present in each of the asset classes. In setting the long-term expected rate of return for the system, stochastic projections are employed to model future returns under various economic conditions. The results provide a range of returns over various time periods that ultimately provide a median return of 7.11%, including expected inflation of 2.50%. OnOctober10,2019,theVRSBoardelectedalong-termrateof6.75%whichisroughly at the 40th percentile of expected long-term results of the VRS fund asset allocation at that time, providing a median return of 7.11%, including inflation of 2.50%.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Note 13. Other Postemployment Benefits Liability (Continued)
The discount rate used to measure the GLI and HIC OPEB liabilities was 6.75%. The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that System member contributions will be made per the VRS Guidance and the employer contributions will be made in accordance with the VRS funding policy at rates equal to the difference between actuarially determined contribution rates adopted by the VRS Board of Trustees and the member rate. Through the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020, the rate contributed by the employer for the OPEB liabilities will be subject to the portion of the VRS Board-certified rates that are funded by the Virginia General Assembly. From July 1, 2020 on, participating employers are assumed to contribute 100% of the actuarially determined contribution rates. Basedonthoseassumptions,theOPEBplans’fiduciarynetpositionwasprojectedtobeavailabletomake all projected future benefit payments of current active and inactive employees. Therefore the long-term expected rate of return was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total OPEB liability.
The following presents the net OPEB liabilities of the School Board, as well as what the School Board’s net OPEB liabilities would be if it were calculated using a discount ratethat is one percentage point lower (5.75% HIC and GLI) or one percentage point higher (7.75% HIC and GLI) than the current discount rate:
Information about the various VRS OPEB plan fiduciary net position is available in the separately issued VRS 2021 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (Annual Report) A copy of the 2021 VRS Annual Report may be downloaded from the VRS website at http://www.varetire.org/Pdf/Publications/2021annual-report.pdf, or by writing to the System’s Chief Financial Officer at P.O. Box 2500, Richmond, VA, 23218-2500.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
A summary of the other postemployment benefits-related financial statement elements is as follows:
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
A summary of the other postemployment benefits-related financial statement elements is as follows: (Continued)
TheCountyandSchoolBoardareexposedtovariousrisksoflossrelatedtotorts,theftof,damageto, and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; and natural disasters. The County participates with other localities in the Virginia Association of Counties Liability Pool, a public risk entity pool, for its coverage of general liability, auto insurance, and workers’ compensation. Each member of this risk pool jointly and severally agrees to assume, pay, and discharge any liability. The County pays the contributions and assessmentsbaseduponclassificationandratesintoadesignatedcashreservefundoutofwhichexpenses of the pool, claims, and awards are to be paid. In the event of a loss deficit and depletion of all available excess insurance, the pool may assess all members in the proportion in which the premium of each bears to the total premiums of all members in the year in which such deficit occurs. The County continues to carry commercial insurance for all other risks of loss. Settled claims resulting from these risks have not exceeded commercial insurance coverage for the past three years and there have not been any significant reductions in insurance coverage over the previous year.
(Continued)
The County and School Board have a professionally administered self-insurance program that provides health coverage for employees on a cost-reimbursement basis. Retired employees and dependents of employees of the County and School Board are also covered by the program, provided they pay the entire premium. Under the program, the County and School Board are obligated for claims payments. A stop loss insurance contract executed with Blue Cross and Blue Shield covers claims in excess of $250,000 per covered individual During the current fiscal year, total claims expense of $5,215,687 and $13,781,971fortheCountyandSchoolBoard,respectively,whichdidnotexceedthestoplossprovisions, was incurred. This represents claims processed and an estimate, based on plan experience prior and subsequenttoyearend,forclaimsincurredbutnotreported(IBNR)asofJune30. Theestimatedliability, including reported and IBNR claims, was $496,560 and $2,897,125 for the County and School Board, respectively, at year end. This liability is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses. Changes in the reported liability are as follows:
(Continued)
VariousclaimsarependingagainsttheCounty. Intheopinionofmanagement,afterconsultingwithlegal counsel, the potential loss on all claims will not materially affect the County’s financial position.
Special purpose grants are subject to audit to determine compliance with their requirements. County officials believe that if any refunds are required, they will be immaterial.
In August 2021, the Office of Drinking Water (ODW) and VA Department of Health (VDH) notified the Authority of 5 publicly regulated, privately owned water systems in the County that were non-compliant. VDH requested the Authority take over the systems as the operator of last resort. The ODW offered to provide the Authority $4 million in grant funding and a loan of $750,000 from the Virginia Water Supply Revolving Fund (Note 14) in exchange for the PSA agreeing to take over the systems. On February 28, 2022, the Authority Board passed a resolution to complete the receivership process for operation of the systems. The Authority has taken over the operation of the systems and is in the process of bringing the systems into compliance pursuant to a court order dated May 2, 2022 that was initiated by the state attorney general’s office.
The County is liable for up to $500,000 for return of certain Governor’s Opportunity Funds made available as an incentive to a local business that entered bankruptcy before meeting the requirements of the incentive. Management estimates the liability will not exceed $380,000, and has recorded a liability in that amount.
The EDA enters into performance agreement incentives with various companies. At year end, incentives not yet earned by recipient companies were $4,822,053
In June 2022, the EDA entered into an agreement to sell a parcel of land. As part of the agreement, that the EDA agreed to reimburse the purchaser up to $1,066,000 to construct a road. In addition, the EDA agreed to hold $787,125 in escrow to be used towards the reimbursement of the road construction cost. As of June 30, 2022, no costs had been incurred.
June 30, 2022 (Continued)
June 30, 2022
Economic Development Authority
Advances to Component Unit:
Non-interestbearingadvancestotheEDA forthepurchaseofcapitalitemsaretoberepaidfromthesales of land and other revenues of the EDA. There is no deed of trust held by the County for the properties. Therefore, there is opportunity for these properties to be encumbered with additional financing upon approval of the County on a project-by-project basis.
Advances consist of the following:
On June 17, 1997, the EDA signed an interest-free promissory note with the County in the amount of $1,274,620. The EDA agreed to remit to the County all funds received pursuant to property sales or payments received on property leases from the Falling Branch Industrial Park, less reasonable costs in repayment of the note upon demand by the County. The balance due at June 30 was $516,627.
Other
The County provides personnel and office space to the EDA at no charge.
At June 30, School Board had a deficit in unrestricted net position of $87,797,456 The School Board deficit results primarily from the net pension and OPEB liabilities The deficit is anticipated to be recovered through futurerevenues, as well as possible transfers and contributions from the General Fund.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
Fund balance is classified as nonspendable, restricted, committed, assigned, and/or unassigned based primarily on the extent to which the County is bound to observe constraints imposed upon the use of the resources in the governmental funds. The constraints placed on fund balance for the governmental funds are presented below:
Two Public Service Authority customers provide approximately eight and seven percent, respectively, of the Authority’s operating revenue.
(Continued)
June 30, 2022
The Public Service Authority maintains contracts for water purchase and sewer treatment services with the following organizations:
New River Valley Regional Water Authority
Blacksburg VPI Sanitation Authority
Pepper’s Ferry Regional Wastewater Treatment Authority
During June 2013, Montgomery County joined the New River Valley Regional Water Authority (NRVRWA). WhileMontgomeryCountyisthelegalmemberoftheNRVRWA,allcostsassociatedwith the membership are paid with revenues of the Authority. The Authority must pay a $1,300,000 membership fee over forty years (Note 9). As part of the water agreement, and in exchange for the rights to acquire water from the NRVRWA, the Authority transferred a section of pipe with an estimated value of $877,000 to the Water Authority (Note 8). This exchange created an intangible asset of equal value with an indefinite useful life that is evaluated annually for impairment. The transfer of the pipe occurred in 2014
During 2014, in accordance with joining the Water Authority, the Authority agreed to pay for a transitional meter setting with a cost of $9,358. This was completed in fiscal year 2020 and paid in July 2020. The Authority is responsible for capital upgrades with an estimated cost of $9,200,000. The initial design work of the capital upgrades was completed in fiscal year 2019 and additional design work was required in fiscal years 2020, 2021 and 2022. $1,601,994 in capital upgrades were included in Construction in Progress at June 30, 2022. Funding for the construction of this project has been obtained throughaloanwiththeVirginiaResourcesAuthoritythroughtheVirginiaWaterSupplyRevolving Fund (Note 23).
In fiscal year 2022, the Countyand the Schools adopted GASB Statement No. 87, Leases. This statement required recognition of certain lease assets and liabilities for leases that were classified previously as operating leases and recognized as inflows of resources or outflows of resources based on the payment provisionsoftheleaseagreements. Theadoptionofthisstandardhadnoeffectonbeginningnetpositions or assets, liabilities or deferred inflows of resources related to leases.
The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) has issued the following Statements which are not yet effective. The effective dates below are updated based on Statement No. 95, Postponement of the Effective Dates of Certain Authoritative Guidance due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
In May 2019, the GASB issued Statement No. 91, Conduit Debt Obligations. This Statement provides a single method of reporting conduit debt obligations by issuers and eliminates diversity in practice associated with (1) commitments extended by issuers, (2) arrangements associated with conduit debt obligations,and(3)relatednotedisclosures.TherequirementsofthisStatementareeffectiveforreporting periods beginning after December 15, 2021.
(Continued)
In March 2020, the GASB issued Statement No. 94, Public-Private and Public-Public Partnerships and Availability Payment Arrangements This Statement improves financial reporting by addressing issues related to public-private and public-public partnership arrangements (PPPs). The requirements of this Statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2022.
In May 2020, the GASB issued Statement No. 96, Subscription-Based Information Technology Arrangements This Statement provides guidance on the accounting and financial reporting for subscription-based information technology arrangements (SBITAs) for government end users (governments). The requirements of this Statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2022.
In April 2022, the GASB issued Statement No. 99, Omnibus 2022. The objectives of this Statement are to enhance comparability in accounting and financial reporting and to improve the consistency of authoritative literature by addressing (1) practice issues that have been identified during implementation and application of certain GASB Statements and (2) accounting and financial reporting for financial guarantees. The requirements related to extension of the use of LIBOR, accounting for SNAP distributions, disclosures of nonmonetary transactions, pledges of future revenues by pledging governments, clarification of certain provisions in Statement 34, as amended, and terminology updates related to Statement 53 and Statement 63 are effective upon issuance. The requirements related to leases, PPPs, and SBITAs are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2022, and all reporting periods thereafter. The requirements related to financial guarantees and the classification and reporting of derivative instruments within the scope of Statement 53 are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2023, and all reporting periods thereafter.
In June 2022, the GASB issued Statement No. 100, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. This Statementrequiresdisclosureinnotestofinancialstatementsofdescriptiveinformationaboutaccounting changes and error corrections, such as their nature. In addition, information about the quantitative effects on beginning balances of each accounting change and error correction should be disclosed by reporting unit in a tabular format to reconcile beginning balances as previously reported to beginning balances as restated. The requirements of this Statement are effective for accounting changes and error corrections madeinfiscalyearsbeginningafterJune15,2023,andallreportingperiodsthereafter.Earlierapplication is encouraged.
In June 2022, the GASB issued Statement No. 101, Compensated Absences. This statement updates the recognitionandmeasurementguidanceforcompensatedabsencesandamendscertainpreviouslyrequired disclosures. The requirements of this Statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2023.
Management has not determined the effects these new GASB Statements may have on prospective financial statements.
June 30, 2022 (Continued)
June 30, 2022
On July 14, 2022, the Authority closed on a loan with the Virginia Resources Authority through the VirginiaWaterSupplyRevolvingFundof$7,164,626andloanforgivenessof$1,400,000withaninterest rate of 1.67%. The proceeds will be used by the Authority to complete capital upgrades as agreed upon with the Water Authority (Note 20) and other capital upgrades necessary as part of taking over noncompliant water systems (Note 21).
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, VIRGINIA
SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN NET PENSION LIABILITY AND RELATED RATIOSREQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
PRIMARY GOVERNMENT
June 30, 2022
Plan Year
The plan years above are reported in the entity’s financial statements in the fiscal year following the plan year - i.e., plan year 2021 information was presented in the entity’s fiscal year 2022 financial report.
This schedule is intended to show information for 10 years. Since fiscal year 2015 (plan year 2014) was the first year for this presentation, no earlier data is available. Additional years will be included as they become available.
The Public Service Authority is a cost sharing entity, therefore it is included in the primary government information above.
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, VIRGINIA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN NET PENSION LIABILITY AND RELATED RATIOS SCHOOLS - NONPROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES
June 30, 2022
Plan Year
The plan years above are reported in the entity’s financial statements in the fiscal year following the plan year - i.e., plan year 2021 information was presented in the entity’s fiscal year 2022 financial report.
Since fiscal year 2015 (plan year 2014) was the first year for this presentation, no earlier data is available. Additional years will be included as theybecome available.
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SCHEDULE OF PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS
June 30, 2022
Schedule is intended to show information for 10 years. Since 2015 was the first year for this presentation, only eight years of data is available. Additional years will be included as they become available.
The Public Service Authority is a cost sharing entity, therefore it is included in the primary government information above.
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
SCHEDULE OF EMPLOYER’S SHARE OF NET PENSION LIABILITY
VRS TEACHER RETIREMENT PLAN
June 30, 2022
Schedule is intended to show information for 10 years. Since fiscal year 2015 (plan year 2014) was the first year for this presentation, data prior to 2015 is not available. Additional years will be included as they become available.
Schedule is intended to show information for 10 years. Since 2015 was the first year for this presentation, data prior to 2015 is not available. Additional years will be included as they become available.
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, VIRGINIA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN NET OPEB LIABILITY AND RELATED RATIOS – LOCAL PLAN
June 30, 2022
Plan Year 2021
Primary Government Schools
Plan Year 2020
Primary Government Schools
Plan Year 2019
Primary Government Schools
Plan Year 2018
Primary Government Schools
Plan Year 2017
Primary Government Schools
The plan years above are reported in the entity’s financial statements in the fiscal year following the plan year - i.e., plan year 2021 information was presented in the entity’s fiscal year 2022 financial report.
This schedule is intended to show information for 10 years. Since fiscal year 2018 (plan year 2017) is the first year for this presentation, no earlier data is available. Additional years will be included as they become available.
The Public Service Authority is a cost sharing entity, therefore it is included in the primary government above.
The Notes to Required Supplementary Information are an integral part of this statement.
SCHEDULE OF EMPLOYER’S SHARE OF NET OPEB LIABILITY – VRS
June 30, 2022
The plan years above are reported in the entity’s financial statements in the fiscal year following the plan year – i.e., plan year 2021 information was presented in the entity’s fiscal year 2022 financial report.
Schedule is intended to show information for 10 years. Since fiscal year 2018 (plan year 2017) was the first year for this presentation, no earlier data is available. However, additional years will be included as they become available.
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
SCHEDULE OF OPEB CONTRIBUTIONS – VRS
June 30, 2022
The covered payroll amounts above are for the entity’s fiscal year - i.e., the covered payroll on which required contributions were based for the same year.
The Public Service Authority is a cost sharing entity, therefore it is included in the primary government above.
Schedule is intended to show information for 10 years. Since plan year 2018 is the first year for this presentation for Health InsuranceTeachers, Group Life Insurance - General Employees, School Professionals, and School Non-Professionals and plan year 2020 is the first year for this presentation for Health Insurance - School Non-Professionals, no earlier data is available. However, additional years will be included as they become available. The
SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN NET OPEB LIABILITY AND RELATED RATIOSSCHOOLS - NONPROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES
June 30, 2022
The plan years above are reported in the entity’s financial statements in the fiscal year following the plan year - i.e., plan year 2021 information was presented in the entity’s fiscal year 2022 financial report.
This schedule is intended to show information for 10 years. Since fiscal year 2021 (plan year 2020) was the first year for this presentation, no earlier data is available. Additional years will be included as they become available.
June 30, 2022
There have been no actuarially material changes to the Virginia Retirement System (System) benefit provisions since the prior actuarial valuation.
Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB)
There have been no actuarially material changes to the System benefit provisions since the prior actuarial valuation.
The actuarial assumptions used in the June 30, 2020, valuation were based on the results of an actuarial experience study for the period from July 1, 2016, through June 30, 2020, except the change in the discount rate, which was based on VRS Board action effective as of July 1, 2019. Changes to the actuarial assumptions as a result of the experience study and VRS Board action are as follows:
Largest 10
Non-Hazardous Duty:
- Update mortality table to PUB2010 public sector mortality tables. For future mortality improvements, replace load with a modified Mortality Scape MP-2020.
- Adjusted retirement rates to better fit experience for Plan 1; set separate rates based on experience for Plan2/Hybrid; changed final retirement age.
- Adjusted withdrawal rates to better fit experience at each year and service through 9 years of service.
- No change to disability rates.
- No change to salary scale.
- No change to line of duty rates.
- No change to discount rate.
Largest 10 – Hazardous Duty/Public Safety Employees:
- Update mortality table to PUB2010 public sector mortality tables. For future mortality improvements, replace load with a modified Mortality Scape MP-2020.
- Adjusted retirement rates to better fit experience and changed final retirement age from 65 to 70.
- Decreased withdrawal rates.
- No change to disability rates.
- No change to salary scale.
- No change to line of duty rates.
- No change to discount rate.
June 30, 2022
All Others (Non 10 Largest) – Non-Hazardous Duty:
- Update mortality table to PUB2010 public sector mortality tables. For future mortality improvements, replace load with a modified Mortality Scape MP-2020.
- Adjusted retirement rates to better fit experience and changed final retirement age from 65 to 70.
- Decreased withdrawal rates.
- No change to disability rates.
- No change to salary scale.
- No change to line of duty rates.
- No change to discount rate.
All Others (Non 10 Largest) – Hazardous Duty/Public Safety Employees:
- Update mortality table to PUB2010 public sector mortality tables. For future mortality improvements, replace load with a modified Mortality Scape MP-2020.
- Adjusted retirement rates to better fit experience and changed final retirement age from 65 to 70.
- Decreased withdrawal rates and changed from rates based on age and service to rates based on serviceonlytobetterfitexperienceandtobemoreconsistentwithLocalsLargest10Hazardous Duty.
- No change to disability rates.
- No change to salary scale.
- No change to line of duty rates.
- No change to discount rate.
Teacher cost-sharing pool
- Update mortality table to PUB2010 public sector mortality tables. For future mortality improvements, replace load with a modified Mortality Scape MP-2020.
- Adjusted retirement rates to better fit experience for Plan 1; set separate rates based on experience for Plan2/Hybrid; changed final retirement age from 78 to 80 for all.
- Adjusted withdrawal rates to better fit experience at each year and service through 9 years of service.
- No change to disability rates.
- No changes to salary scale.
- No change to discount rate.
June 30, 2022
Reconciliation with Pulic Service Authority activities in the statement of net position (Exhibit 1)
Long-term membership fee payable to other New River Valley Regional Water Authority legally due from the County but financed by enterprise
E
XHIBIT A-2
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN FUND NET POSITION
DISCRETELY PRESENTED COMPONENT UNIT – PUBLICE SERVICE AUTHORITY
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
cash provided by operating
SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sale of capital assets in accounts receivable
Special Revenue Funds – Special revenue funds are used to account for specific revenues that are legally restricted to expenditures for particular purposes. The componentunit–SchoolBoardhasthefollowingspecial revenue funds.
School Operating Fund – This fund accounts for the operations of the elementary, middle, and high schools.
School Cafeteria Fund – This fund accounts for the operations of the centralized cafeterias.
School Activity Fund – This fund accounts for the operations of the elementary, middle, and high school activity funds.
used in governmental activities are not current financial resources, and therefore, are not reported in the
are not financial resources, and therefore, are not reported in the funds.
Certain amounts are recognized as expenditures when paid in the fund statements, but are capitalized and recorded in future periods for governmental activities.
Financial statement elements related to pensions are applicable to future periods and, therefore, are not reported in the funds.
liabilities, including compensated absences, are not due and payable
liabilities in the current period and therefore are not reported as liabilities in
Reconciliation to the Statement of Activities (Exhibit 2)
Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives and reported as depreciation expense. That is the amount by which capital outlay ($3,224,818) exceeded depreciation ($1,459,869).
funds report pension contributions as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities, the cost of pension benefits earned net of employee contributions is reported as pension expense.
Governmental funds report other postemployment benefit contributions as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities, the cost of other postemployment benefits earned net of employee contributions is reported as other postemployment benefits expense.
Some expenses reported in the statement of activities do not require the use of current
financial resources and, therefore, are not reported as expenditures in governmental funds.
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES –BUDGET AND ACTUAL – CASH BASIS DISCRETELY PRESENTED COMPONENT UNIT – SCHOOL BOARD
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 1. Basis of Accounting
This schedule was prepared on the budgetary (cash) basis.
Note 2. Nonmonetary Assistance
Nonmonetary assistance is reported in the Schedule of Federal Awards at the fair market value of the food commodities or food stamps disbursed. At June 30, 2022, the School Board had food commodities totaling $314,164 in inventory.
Note 3: De Minimis Indirect Cost Rate
The entity did not elect to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate.
Note 4: Outstanding Loan Balances
At June 30, 2022, the County had no outstanding loan balances requiring continuing disclosure.
This part of the County of Montgomery’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report presents detailed information as a context for understanding what the information in the financial statements, note disclosures, and required supplementary information says about the County’s overall financial health.
Financial Trends
These tables contain trend information to help the reader understand how the County’s financial performance and well-being have changed over time.
Revenue Capacity
ThesetablescontaininformationtohelpthereaderassessthefactorsaffectingtheCounty’sabilitytogenerate its property and sales taxes.
Debt Capacity
These tables present information to help the reader assess the affordability of the County’s current levels of outstanding debt and the County’s ability to issue additional debt in the future.
Demographic and Economic Information
Thesetablesofferdemographicandeconomicindicatorstohelpthereaderunderstandtheenvironmentwithin which the County’s financial activities take place and to help make comparisons over time and with other governments.
Operating Information
These schedules contain information about the County’s operations and resources to help the reader understand how the County’s financial information relates to the services it provides and the activities it performs.
1-4
5-8
9-11
12-13
14-15
Sources: Unlessotherwisenoted,theinformationintheseschedulesisderivedfromtheAnnualComprehensiveFinancialReports for the relevant year. The County implemented GASB Statement 34 in 2003; schedules presenting government-wide information include information beginning in that year.
County of Montgomery, Virginia Net Position by Component Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year
* GASB Statement No. 75 was adopted in fiscal year 2018. Information for previous years presented is unavailable.
Year
County of Montgomery, Virginia Fund Balances - Governmental Funds
Last Ten Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting)
County of Montgomery, Virginia Assessed Value and Actual Value of Taxable Property Last Ten Fiscal Years
Notes: Property is assessed at full market value. Properties are reassessed once every four years.
* Per $100 of assessed value.
Source: Assessor’s Office
Rates are per $100 of assessed value.
Last Ten Calendar Years
Note: adjustments are included in Collections in Subsequent Years. This results in the Percent of Levy exceeding 100% in some years.
* Taxes Levied for the Fiscal Year reflect the original levy and do not include subsequent adjustments. Subsequent
*includes issuance premiums and debt service reserves have been removed
Notes: Details regarding the County’s outstanding debt can be found in Note 9 to Financial Statements.
County of Montgomery, Virginia
Pledged Revenue Coverage
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Debt Service
Beginning in fiscal year 2016, the Montgomery County Public Service Authority was disclosed as a discretely presented component unit instead of a blended component unit.
Notes: Details regarding the County’s outstanding debt can be found in the Notes to Financial Statements.
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Note: Population, school enrollment, and unemployment figures are based on fiscal year ending June 30.
Per Capita Income is as of December 31.
Source: Population, personal income, and unemployment - Economic Development Department Public school enrollment - School Board Administration
Current Year and Nine Years Ago
County of Montgomery, Virginia Operating Indicators by Function/Program
Source: County departments
* 2018 and prior excludes Pool participants and Multi-Juristictional programs.
We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and the Specifications for Audits of Counties, Cities, and Towns and the Specifications for Audits of Authorities, Boards, and Commissions, issued by the Auditor of Public Accounts of the Commonwealth of Virginia, the financial statements of the governmental activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, and each major fund of the County of Montgomery, Virginia (the “County”), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2022, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the County’s basic financial statements and have issued our report thereon dated March 28, 2023.
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the County’s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the County’s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the County’s internal control.
A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.
Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies and therefore, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may exist that were not identified. We did identify a certain deficiency in internal control, described in the accompanying schedule of findings and responses as item 2022-001, that we consider to be a material weakness.
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the County’s financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the financial statements. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards.
The County’s response to the finding identified in our audit is described in the accompanying schedule of findings and responses. The County’s response was not subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, accordingly, we express no opinion on it.
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the entity’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose.
Roanoke, Virginia
March 28, 2023
We have audited the County of Montgomery, Virginia’s (the “County”) compliance with the types of compliance requirements identified as subject to audit in the OMB Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect on each of the County’s major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2022. The County’s major federal programs are identified in the summary of auditor’s results section of the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs.
In our opinion, the County complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on each of its major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2022
We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Our responsibilities under those standards and the Uniform Guidance are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section of our report.
We are required to be independent of the County and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with relevant ethical requirements related to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion on compliance for each major federal program. Our audit does not provide a legal documentation of the County’s compliance with the compliance requirements referred to above.
Management is responsible for compliance with the requirements referred to above and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of effective internal control over compliance with the requirements of laws, statutes, regulations, rules, and provisions of contracts or grant agreements applicable to the County’s federal programs.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether material noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above occurred, whether due to fraud or error, and express an opinion on the County’s compliance based on our audit. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, Government Auditing Standards, and the Uniform Guidance will always detect material noncompliance when it exists. The risk of not detecting material noncompliance resulting from fraud is higher than for that resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above is considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, it would influence the judgement made by a reasonable user of the report on compliance about the County’s compliance with the requirements of each major federal program as a whole.
In performing an audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, Government Auditing Standards, and the Uniform Guidance, we:
Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit.
Identify and assess the risk of material noncompliance, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the County’s compliance with the compliance requirements referred to above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
Obtain an understanding of the County’s internal control over compliance relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the County’s internal control over compliance. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in internal control over compliance that we identified during the audit.
The results of our auditing procedures disclosed instances of noncompliance which are required to be reported in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and which are described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs as item 2022-002. Our opinion on each major federal program is not modified with respect to this matter.
Government Auditing Standards requires the auditor to perform limited procedures on the County’s response to the noncompliance findings identified in our audit and described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs. The County’s response was not subjected to the other auditing procedures applied in the audit of compliance and, accordingly, we express no opinion on the response.
A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.
Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section above and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined above. However, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance may exist that have not been identified.
Our audit was not designed for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose.
June 30, 2022
As more fully described in the Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we performed tests of the County’s compliance with certain provisions of the laws, regulations, contracts, and grants shown below.
Code of Virginia
Budget and Appropriation Laws
Cash and Investment Laws
Conflicts of Interest Act
Local Retirement Systems
Debt Provisions
Procurement Laws
Uniform Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act
Inmate Canteen Funds
Comprehensive Services Act
Sheriff Internal Controls
Fire Program Aid
State Agency Requirements
Education
Social Services
Compliance Supplement for Single Audits of State and Local Governments
Provisions and conditions of agreements related to federal programs selected for testing.
Year Ended June 30, 2022
1. The auditor’s report expresses an unmodified opinion on the financial statements.
2. One material weakness relating to the audit of the financial statements was reported in the Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards
3. No instances of noncompliance material to the financial statements were disclosed.
4. No significant deficiencies relating to the audit of major federal award programs were reported in the Independent Auditor’s Report on Compliance for Each Major Program and on Internal Control Over Compliance Required by the Uniform Guidance.
5. The auditor’s report on compliance for the major federal award programs expresses an unmodified opinion.
6. The audit disclosed one audit finding relating to the major programs.
7. The programs tested as major are:
8. The threshold for distinguishing Type A and B programs was $750,000.
9. The County was not determined to be a low-risk auditee.
Year Ended June 30, 2022
2022-001: Segregation of Duties (Material Weakness)
Condition:
A fundamental concept of internal controls is the separation of duties. No one employee should have access to both physical assets and the related accounting records, or to all phases of a transaction. A proper segregation of duties has not been established in functions related to payroll, accounts payable, accounts receivable, cash disbursements, and financial reporting. This exposes the County and School Board to a heightened risk of misappropriation.
Recommendation:
Steps should be taken to eliminate performance of conflicting duties, where possible, or to implement effective compensating controls.
Management’s Response:
Management concurs. The County and School Board have taken all steps deemed practical and cost beneficial to minimize conflicting duties.
2022-002: SNAP Cluster – State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistant Program – ALN #10.561, Eligibility
Condition:
Social Services did not verify the social security number for a household member in one out of twenty five applications selected for testing which were used to determine eligibility and benefit levels.
Criteria:
Under the requirements in the Uniform Guidance, social security numbers for all household members are required to be verified when applying for SNAP benefits.
Cause:
Social Services typically verifies all social security numbers for all household members included in the application for benefits, however, one household member was overlooked during the verification process.
Effect:
The lack of proper social security number verification could result in improper use of Federal funds on an ineligible individual.
Year Ended June 30, 2022
2022-002: SNAP Cluster – State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistant Program – ALN #10.561, Eligibility (Continued)
Perspective Information:
One individual was not verified on one application out of twenty-five household applications selected.
Recommendation:
Management should implement a procedure to ensure that social security numbers for all household members are properly verified.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action:
Social Services will put into place a procedure to ensure that all social security numbers are verified during the eligibility determination process.
None noted.
SUMMARY SCHEDULE OF PRIOR AUDIT FINDING
June 30, 2022
2021-001: Segregation of Duties (Material Weakness)
Condition:
A fundamental concept of internal controls is the separation of duties. No one employee should have access to both physical assets and the related accounting records, or to all phases of a transaction. A proper segregation of duties has not been established in functions related to payroll, accounts payable, accounts receivable, cash disbursements, and financial reporting. This exposes the County and School Board to a heightened risk of misappropriation.
Current Status:
Condition still present. See finding 2022-001 in current year Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs.