Muhammad Faizal Ismail
Architectural Portfolio
FAIZAL ISMAIL CURRICULUM VITAE
PROFILE
EXPERIENCE
SKILLS
MUHAMMAD FAIZAL ISMAIL
RESEARCH ASSISTANT
Microsoft Office Suites
2061, Lorong Gelama 6, Taman Samudera, 32040 Seri Manjung, Perak
Conducted architectural analysis of Melbourne retail strips on behalf of NH Architecture.
fezfaizal@gmail.com +601124399503 (Malaysia)
https://issuu.com/muhammadfaizalismail
BIOGRAPHY I’m a 26 years old Graduate Architect seeking to further my career in a design based architecture firm. Graduated with Distinction from RMIT University, I have been exposed with different tenets of architecture, from highly theoretical design studios to practical problem solving studios. My current interest in architecture lies within the realm of logical and methodological application of culturally specific aesthetics to a site specific architecture, exemplified by my thesis, Arab Recall. Having experienced working in two different firms, I’m seeking an opportunity to work in a environment where good design is celebrated and ideas are debated. Outside architecture, I enjoy taking a walk alone exploring Kuala Lumpur, whilst imagining solutions to non existing design problems.
EDUCATION MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE RMIT UNIVERSITY, 2015-2016 Pass with Distinction
(M.Arch)
RMIT UNIVERSITY, 2012-2014 Pass with Distinction
WESTERN AUSTRALIA CERTIFICATE OF EDUCATION 2
Indesign Illustrator
Conducted research on the application of the SEPP65 guideline for Melbourne apartments.
Photoshop
STUDENT ARCHITECT
Rhinoceros
NH ARCHITECTURE November 2015 - February 2016 Empire City 2 (Damansara) masterplan - Design and masterplanning works for the low cost housing package.
AutoCAD Revit Sketchup
Sydney Fish Market masterplan - Provide visualisation works and presentation preparation. NGV Summer Pavilion Competition
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Shortlisted for Semester 1 2015 RMIT Architecture
-Design iterations and board preparation.
Award for Design Excellence For the project ‘Victorya Gardens’
GRADUATE ARCHITECT
Shortlisted for Semester 1 2016 RMIT Architecture
UIG ARCHITECTS March 2015 - current
Award for Design Excellence For the project ‘Not a Train Station’
Mixed Development at Jalan Belfield - Feasibility studies and concept design proposal. MET 2 KL Metropolis
BACHELOR OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN (B.Arch)
KBU INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE, 2010-2011
NH ARCHITECTURE July - October 2015
- Design iterations for hotel & hotel residence. - Presentation preparations for the design competition. MK27 - 37 storey condominium at Mont Kiara - Liase with clients on the redesign of facade, facilities floors and unit layout. - Coordination works with other consultants. -Preparation of show unit tender documentations. -Preparation of Submission Drawings to DBKL -Coordination for the Main Drain Package.
REFEREEE Peter Knight Project Architect at Workshop Architecture Design studio leader and thesis supervisor at RMIT peter.e.knight@gmail.com +61423 686 773
This portfolio is a compilation of works done throughout 5 years of tertiary education and application of learned skill in working environment. The diversity of this portfolio reflects the exposure I had in dealing with differents branch of architecture through university projects. This also meant that there is no particular ‘style’ or direction that I seek to established within this collection of works. Much like this collection, I believe that a diverse architecture reflect the environment we live in.
Architecture at its most eclectic form/ condition comes with more lessons to learn from, compared to an exclusive, singular way of approaching architecture. Much like my studio works, I intend to explore the diversity of design methodologies and apply these within my future works.
3
VICTORYA GARDENS
Victorya Gardens is a factory looking as the relationship between technology and nature. The factory is a place for research & development and an experiential journey through the future technologies of food production.The factory aims to cater both the growth and need for green spaces in the CBD by providing “green trays� which can be used for the cultivation of food. The aesthetic of the building is based on the vertical stacking of the factory relying on a vertical production line. Located on the main food district of the CBD, Victorya Gardens provides the main source of fresh produce in the city with an abundance of recreational spaces for the public as well.
4
is a showcase for Australias unique flora and a mix of technology and nature in relating the factories purpose for the environment. The pavilion emphasizes nature’s THEand SPEAKERS make-ability artificiality thatCORNER technology and nature need not be mutually exclusive, they can perfectly well reinforced one another.
The building is designed to have multiple distinctively different zones, each with its own atmospheric quality and functionality. These staggered modules stitched together by a central core and enveloped by breathable facade.
External Circulation The Atrium
The Atrium
THE HANGING GARDENS
THE HANGING GARDENS
Because Australia is particularly asgreen its flora constitutes of isthea controlled world’s total of species, withthe 22% of of them The following space is the “pink” house as significant opposed the house. The pink15% house environment where future food proas The under threatenter of extinction, the seedorbank can bechamber the seen as the most this important partspace. of theSunlight building. Here ductionidentified takes place. workers a decontamination disinfectant before entering controlled is not needed for the growth of these farm cultivation environment is tailored to plant and processes to the creation the seeds are food. kept The in vaults but arecan be seen by the public on transpiration private tours, theother bottom part ofleading the seedbank can of an optimum environment for plant growth designed just bank the right distribution of air temperatures around only be accessed by the with stuffairforconditioning cultivation.systems Each level in the for seed is only accessible through the core of the thecultivation units. building. This façade of this space is opaque façade rack on the outside but on the inside, light enters the space through the stone façade where the seeds are store against it. Atelier
Hydroponic Farming Area
Entry into Seedbank for staff
Atelier
Entry into Seedbank for staff
Female W/C
Female W/C Conveyor Belt
Male W/C
Private circulation Indoor UV ray farming
Male W/C Private circulation Meeting Rooms
Cubicles
Atelier
Decontamination Area
Air Lock Entrance
Meeting Rooms
Cubicles
THE SANCTUARY
Atelier
External Circulation
THE SANCTUARY
The next space is the main entrance of the pavilion which the lift core allows for the public as the first point of entry into the factory. Here the public is able to buy tickets to enter the pavilion or traverse through the exterior circulation cutting in and out the different spaces of the building. The clear tubes that holds the circulation spaces allows for a clear view into each of the floor space inside the factory while having a panoramic view of the city. Public Circulation Entrance
Public Circulation Exit
Ticketing Booth
Foyer
Seating Area
Seating Area
THE “PINK” ROOM
5
The trays would be pla
Melbourne’s urban vague and rooftop predominantly occupied by rooftop bars and synthetic green space
1.The Hanging Gardens
1
1
1 2 3
2
4
3
4
5
3
4
5. The Sanctuary
6. sky terrace
3. The House 2. sky‘Pink’ lobby
6. sky terrace
8.Lobby
3. The ‘Pink’ House 5. The Sanctuary
9.Warehouse
6. sky terrace 4. The Machine
6 7
7. The Lab of Epiphany
5. The Sanctuary 8.Lobby 9.Warehouse
6. sky terrace 10.market
3
7. The Lab of Epiphany 8.Lobby
Once manufactured, the trays would be send out of the factory by drones.
The trays will replace th
9.Warehouse 10.market
Once manufactured, the trays would be send out of the factory by drones.
6 7
4 9
10
8
6 7
10
6 7
public area restricted area
The trays would be placed on rooftops to create a layer of green canopy on top of the city.
10 1.The Hanging Gardens
1
9
CIRCULATION AND PROGRAM DIAGRAMS
8
2. sky lobby
2 3 3
2
public area
4
The trays would be placed on rooftops to create a layer of green canopy on top of the city.
1.The Hanging Gardens
5. The Sanctuary
2. sky lobby
6. sky terrace
3. The ‘Pink’ House
7. The Lab of Epiphany
4. The Machine
8.Lobby
5. The Sanctuary
9.Warehouse
6. sky terrace
10.market
7. The Lab of Epiphany
10
VICTORYA GARDEN
VICTORYA GARDEN retailers Products distributed to retailers
Queen Victoria Market
8.Lobby
5
movements of goods
S
Quee consumers
4
manufacturing industry
public area
trade union and government agencies
The trays will replace the synthetic landscape. Based on the concept of victory garden, the public could use the trays to grow their own food CBD residents
Outer suburb consumers
6 AND 7
PROGRAM DIAGRAMS 6 7
restricted area movements of goods Food product manufacturers
Food Technology Association of Australia manufacturing industry
Department of Agriculture, Fisheries & Forestry
Universities
trade union and government agencies
The vision for future Melbourne. Plugin designed and built in theVictorya Gardens will eventually fill in the urban vague and unused rooftop space. This will create a new layer of green VICTORYA GARDEN canopy covering the CBD.
The trays will replace the synthetic landscape. Based on the concept of victory garden, the public could use the trays
Raw material producer Australian Institute of Food Science & Technology
Food Technology Association of Australia National Farmers’ Federation
Department of Agriculture, Fisheries & Forestry Technical college
CIRCULATION AND PROGRAM DIAGRAMS
8
Food product manufacturers
Australian Institute of Food Science & Technology
National Farmers’ Federation
CB
Universities
Events
9
Town council
Regional fa
Technical college
Events
9 8 10
URBAN NETWORK DIAGRAM
URBAN NETWORK DIAGRAM
restricted area
retailers
10.market
3
Raw material producer
CIRCULATION
public area
Supermarkets
9.Warehouse
restricted area 4
10
PLANTING T
CIRCULATION AND PROGRAM DIAGRAMS
4. The Machine
3
4
6 7
restricted area movements of goods
3. The ‘Pink’ House
1
Potential usage during
public area
movements of goods
6
4. The Machine
3
6 7
8
6 7
1.The Hanging Gardens
7. The Lab of Epiphany
5
4
9
8
6 7
1.The Hanging Gardens 2. sky lobby
5
9
5
5. The Sanctuary
4. The Machine
4
3
4
6 7
3. The ‘Pink’ House
10.market 4
2 6 7
2. sky lobby
3. The ‘Pink’ House 1 4. The Machine
7. The Lab of Epiphany 10.market 2 8.Lobby 3 9.Warehouse
3
5
Melbourne’s urban vague and rooftop predominantly occupied by rooftop bars and synthetic green space
1.The Hanging Gardens
2. sky lobby
Diagrams showing the stacked programs and dual circulation retailers system.
Products distributed t
Atelier
Entry into Seedbank for staff
Female W/C
Male W/C Private circulation
Meeting Rooms
Cubicles
Atelier
THE SANCTUARY
Hydroponic Farming Area
Conveyor Belt
THE FARMERS MARKET
Indoor UV ray farming
Decontamination Area
Air Lock Entrance
External Circulation
Public Circulation Entrance
Public Circulation Exit
Ticketing Booth
From the top: 1. Seed bank (The sanctuary) 2. Market and lobby 3. GM food cultivation zone (The pink house)
7
Foyer
Seating Area
EPHEMERAL ARCHITECTURE
The narrative for this project came from a series of expressive drawing from the site. These drawing shows an impose horizontality that ties the vertical elements together. The main concept of the project is to impose a strong horizontal line across the site and this is expressed through the form of the building. The usage of water on the scheme is a reference towards the historic water canal around the area from the gold mining era.
8
Relics of Fryerstown mining era
200
expressing the site in its ephemerality
The project aims to capture the ephemerality of the surrounding environment. Here, the earlier iteration of the idea capturing the movement of shadows and water throughout the year.
Internal courtyard - summer
The complex provide space to be used for Fyerstown Antique Fair during the summer. Some part of the building would be flooded in the winter by carving through the creek and canal that used to run through the site, thus the pathways.
10 Internal courtyard - winter
Layering of screens and semi opaque walls create spaces with differing level of privacy.
Artist’s residence
External ‘canal’ walkway
11
ARAB RECALL Arab Recall explores the visible representation of immigration in local architecture. With the waves of immigration hitting the Australian shores in recent years, this project explores the architectural potential that might arise from immigration through finding a balance between assimilation of imported architecture to local context and an undiluted display of identity. Arab Recall not only look at an architectural intermediate condition, but also acknowledge both a sense of loss and celebration for those it chiefly ministers to, while also providing a series of joyful urban spaces for all.
The project explores how immigration might manifest in built environment through references to immigrants from the middle east. Thus the importation of foreign programs; madrasa and mosque into the local context; Brunswick Civic Centre
This thesis does not seek to established a single style, nor does it trying to established a single methodology to approach such condition. Rather to explore the potential methods on employing aesthetics in architecture, through logic, if there is any and through methodological abstraction. Clockwise from top left: 1. Library interior 2. Courtyard 3. Urban plaza
12
Brunswic k bath
Tempora ry accomm odation
Commu nity hall
Tempora ry accomm odation
Asylum seeker welcom e centre
Retail
Dryburg
h Street
Bridge to
RMIT ca
mpus
Main pra yer hall
Civic sq
uare
Morelan
d City C
ouncil
Female prayer hall
Council
building
Programs; mosque, madrasa, library, temporary accommodation, market and council building are arranged in a loop with the civic square in the middle, a reference to the ‘Garden of Australian Dreams’ at the National Museum in Canberra
extensio
n
Sydney
Library
Road
Madrasa
Food m
arket
Tradition
al marke
t
13
The site is a centre of activities for the multicultural suburb of Brunswick. Thus the envisioned civic centre is to accomodate these migrants activities along with already established programs such as th town hall and the churches.
10
4
5
6
3 2 1
7
3
8 9
3
1. Moreland City Council - Library 2.St Ambrose Primary School 3.RMIT University 4.Brunswick Baths
14
5. St Ambrose Catholic Parish 6. Theatre at The Mechanics Institute 7. Christ Church Burnswick 8. Brunswick Uniting Church
9. Asylum Seeker Welcome Centre 10. Sydney Rd Community School
Migrant activity centres along Sydney Road, the backbone of Brunswick.
Series of collages looking at importation of foreign architecture into a local context. This is to find the limit of architectural importation in terms of the scale. At what point does such importation become too much?
15
1.0 St Paul’s Cathedral
1.3
2.0 Qastal Palace
2.3
1.1
1.4
2.1
2.4
1.2
1.5
2.2
2.5
16
increasingly pixelated form towards the interior
3.0 Umayyad Mosque
3.3
3.1
3.4
3.2
3.5
Familliar architectural typologies were imported into the site and collaged together to form a new typology. The formal investigation attempts to abstract the act of remembering and expresses the fragile nature of memory, through pixelation of these architectural forms. In a way, suggesting a remembered architecture that is just as dear, but not perfectly rendered.
17
Madrasa
18
Mosque interior The abstraction method also started to speak to scale, as the level of approximation, or clarity of memory, is very much influenced by the physical proximity of the viewer. As such, from the exterior, the pixelation appears in larger grain as compared to the innermost layer which reveals the identity of the imported elements.
19
NOT A TRAIN STATION Not a Train Station looks at subverting the spatial perception of a train station through working on the concept of familliar vs unfamiliar space. A train station is a transitory space with specific routines associated with it. This routine is however forced by the model of the train station. In relation to dementia sufferers, the project aim to question the need for such routine in the train station by proposing a counter routine.
20
Through layering the spaces according to the level of familliarity, the train station becomes a stimulating experience. The image of each individual space is subverted to that of domestic architecture. Thus the stimulation does not become too overwhelming and evokes a certain sense of intimacy.
From left: 1. Activity space 2. Cafe
Faux imagery of comfort, within an uncomfortable environment
21
From left: 1. Crossing 2. Main platform
22
The platform is deemed a necessary space, thus the architecture is stripped down to the trigger elements needed for it to function as a train station, bare of any distracting aesthetics. As such, the architecture follows closely the suburban train station typology.
The masterplan was conceived through the undestanding of realtionship between each programs in an existing suburban context. The arrangement of programs are based on the idea of suburban routine. Programs are laid out along two promenade, the ‘main street’ and the ‘back streeet’. Most commercial programs are located along the main street which forms the commercial front of the site.
Arden Stre
et Oval
North Melbo
North Melbo urne Recreation Centre
urne Footba
ll Club
Arden Stre
et
Market
Carpark Active Leisu
re
Tran
Lauren’s Ha
ll
b
ace
Central Prom
enade
eatre
reet
Concept visualisation of the main street
Cinema/Th
et
Activity Centre
Carpark Dryburgh St
Making Sp
Lauren Stre
t Hu
spor
Market
Library
Undergroun d Carpark
Pro
me
na
Supermarke
Flower Gar
de
den
t
Kinder
Flower Gar
den
Industrial Remnants Park
Victoria St
reet
Undergroun d Carpark
23
ASIAN URBANISM A study of cities of asia and its architecture. The first part of the study is about the relationship between waterways and waterfront slums in Jakarta. The study looks at how the flooding of the Ciliwung river impact the slums architecturally. The second part of the study is looking at the Ningbo Historic Museum, designed by Wang Shu. The purpose of the study is to investigate the relationship between the context and the architecture of the asian cities.
Comparison between Muara Angke and Kampung Melayu, both located at the downstream and upstream of the Ciliwung river.
24
Facade Structure The facade structure is design to support 2 types of wall finishes. In most part of the facade, the wall is set back to provides space for the layered brick facade, which was constructed by local craftsmen. In the angled section of the facade, the concrete wall slab is casted using bamboo, creating a contrasting texture to the ‘wapan’ wall.
Facade Pattern Distribution Diagram Wapan wall section with irregular sized bricks Bamboo cast concrete Mixture of medium to small size bricks, layered in orderly manner
The study of the Ningbo Historic Museum provide the understanding of the traditional facade making craft that is native to Ningbo. The materials used in the making of the facade were collected from the ruins of the old villages around Ningbo.
25
QUEENSBERRY ST TOWER As part of an investigation into construction technology, the design looks at the use of facade to create an environmentally friendly office tower. The design of the building is at best basic as the focus of the project is to document and detail up the building by producing a set of construction drawing.
The focus of the investigation is the moveable sunshading facade coverig the east, north and west face of the building which are exposed to intense sunlight. The facade surface is mapped with the image of a tree from the context, which provide a dgree of gradiation to the intensity of the mesh.
from left: 1. Queensberry Street view 2. System of frames supporting the facade
26
Perspective View
clockwise from top left: 1. Balcony detail 2. East facade detail 3. Entrance detail 4. Folding facade detail
27
PRACTICE RESEARCH: OGRAMS Retail Strips RUDE ST, FITZROY The aim of this research topic is to understand the quantitative and qualitative features that characterize retail strips in Melbourne. Benefits of this is that clients can easily be educated about the typology they are requesting, and design decisions within the practice can be quickly directed by readily accessible research. Research is collected in the form of infographics, text, photography, graphics and architectural drawings.
STREET DIMENSIONS GERTRUDE ST, FITZROY
D
PROGRAMS
D
GERTRUDE ST, FITZROY
D’
4500 4500
UPPER FLOOR
5000
4500
5000
4500 4150
3900
3800
3900
2600
3400
3400
2600
3800
19600
3800
2600
3400
3400
2600
SECTION D-D’
4150
3800
19600
SECTION D-D’
UPPER FLO PRACTICE RESEARCH PLACEMENT | RETAIL STRIP STUDIES
GROUND FLOOR PRACTICE RESEARCH PLACEMENT | RETAIL STRIP STUDIES
PRACTICE RESEARCH PLACEMENT | RETAIL STRIP STUDIES
28
GROUND FLO
ShopsGERTRUDE dimension ST, FITZROY
Total Shop Frontage = 123.1m No. of shops = 15
Avg. Shopfront Width = 8.2m
GLAZING
GERTRUDE ST, FITZROY
NO. OF S
26.1% GLAZING
Glazing
A
PRACTICE RESEARCH PLACEMENT | RETAIL STRIP STUDIES
MATERIALITY - OPAQUE
SHOPFRONT ACTIVITY 26.1% GLAZING GERTRUDE STREET, FITZROY
SMITH ST, COLLINGWOOD 1 (MOOR ST TO GREEVES ST)
GERTRUDE ST, FITZROY Material palette
20.9% GLAZING
LEVEL OF ACTIVATION
1. OVERHANGING
ST TO GREEVES ST)
20.9% GLAZING
2.UMBRELLA SMITH ST, COLLINGWOOD 1 (MOOR ST TO GREEVES ST)
SMITH ST, COLLINGWOOD 2 (LANGRIDGE ST TO WEBB ST)
24.9% GLAZING
1.DISPLAY RACK
2.TABLES & CHAIRS
GERTRUDE ST, FITZROY
2. PARKING TICKETS MACHINE
16% SHOPFRONT ACTIVATION
1. PLANTS
RIDGE ST TO WEBB ST) BELLE’S HOT CHICKEN Retail-miscellaneous
SM
24.9% GLAZING
NO. OF SHOPS WITHIN 100M: 12 NO. OF SHOPS WITH SHOPFRONT ACTIVITY: 2
BROADSHEET RESTAURANT Retail-miscellaneous
AUNT MAGGIE’S
NO. O
29
TYPICAL ‘CLOUD’ FLOOR PLAN
5.5 sqm
PRACTICE RESEARCH: Residential Towers TYPICAL ‘CLOUD’ FLOOR PLAN
5.75 sqm
6s
5.5 sqm 6 sqm
This research looks at a comparing benchmark Melbourne apartments againts the New South Wales’s SEPP65 residential towers guideline. With the recent calls for similar guideline in Melbourne, NH Architecture commisioned this research with the aim of proposing a series of guideline tailored for future residential projects in Melbourne.
2.48 sqm
18m
5.75 sqm
2.48 sqm
5.75 sqm
NATURAL VENTILATION UPPER HOUSE
2.48 sqm
18m
5.5 sqm
NO VENTILATION
CHOSEN RESIDENTIAL TOWERS WELL VENTILATED
5.5 sqm 5.75 sqm
Overall depth of a cross-over or cross-
NO VENTILATION
TYPICAL PODIUM FLOOR PLANthrough apartment does not exceed WELL VENTILATED
TYPICAL ‘CLOUD’ FLOOR PLAN
18m, measured glass line to glass line.
5.75 sqm RESIDENTIAL TOWER STUDIES
The area of unobstructed window openings should be equal to at least 5% of the floor served. RESIDENTIAL TOWER STUDIES
55.72sqm
45.6 sqm
36 sqm
qm
6s
1.8
3.3
m sq
qm
4s
12. 13
sq
m
1 BEDROOM
m
1.
54
sq
unobstructed window openings = 89% of floor area served
m
41
sq
sq
62
4.
5
4.
.9
30
96
-No carpark
4.
total floor area = 55.72 sqm total unobstructed window openings = 49.7 sqm
-Winner of Best Overend Awards for Residential Architecture - multiple housing.
qm 8s
4.3
UPPER HOUSE - JACKSON CLEMENTS BURROWS
-Mid rise podium tower
sqm
m
UPPER HOUSE - JACKSON CLEMENTS BURROWS 2 BEDROOM
CLARA APARTMENT - ELENBERG FRASER 2 BEDROOM
qm
5s
7.7
4.4
sqm
33 MACKENZIE STREET - ELENBER
HEIGHT
8 SUMMER WINTER 0.6 .9
8 0.6.9 0.9
0.9
WINTER SUMMER 0.6
0.7 0.4 0.7 0.4 8.9 8.9 3.7 8.9 3.7 1.1 3 1 . 7.6 7 1 3.1 7.60 3.1 rooms .60 . 1 0 .9 .9 .9 3.3 0.5 0. 30.3.4 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.7 0.4 7 1 1 1 3 3 0 0 0 2.8 2.8 2.8 .7 .5 .7 .5 .5 1.1 3 1.1 7.6 3.1 7.6 3.1 .1 7.6 3 1 1 . 3 0.7 3.3 0 0 0.5 0..7 0.5 0.7.7 0.7 7 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.927..81 279..81 27..81 1.4 1 10. 0.7 0 10.1 12. 1.40.7 0 10.112. 10.7 0.9 1 9 9 .9 2 2 10. 72.8 .9 79.1.8 7.1.8 9 .1 4.5 3.7 4.5 4.5 3 1.4 .7 10 1 1 10.11. 10. .1 .112. .4 1 12.9 1 9 3 2 2 3.23.8 . . . 8 8 3 0.5 0. 0.5 0.7 0.7 74 10. 10. 4.5 10. 4.5 .5 5 5 5
10. 10. 7 7 10. 9 9.00 9.00 A.M A.M 1 12. .4 12. 9 9
3.0 0.9
10.
6
3.4
0.9 9.6 10. 2 6 .4 3.4 9.6 11. 2.4 9 3.4
11.
11.
9
7
8.5 4 FUNIT D FUNIT DUNIT 5.0
5.0
8.5
4
6.3%
3.3 3.7
10.
6 2.4
3.3 10.
11.
9 1.4
2.4
9
10.
9 1.4
9
9.00 9.00 A.M A.M
0.0%
3.7
1.1 1.1 0.5 10.7 10. 9 1 12. 10..47 9 10. 9 1.4 12. 9
3.7
1.1
0.5
W
0.9
1. 0.9 1 0.5 0.7 31.70.5 3.710.5 1.1 1.1 3.3 0.5 100..7 3.3 0.5 100.7. 7 7 10. 10. 5 10.9 5 1 12. 1.40.7 12. 10.7 9 9 10. 9 4.5 4.5 1 12. .4 12. 9 9 3.3
0.5
0.9
0.7
9.00 A.M 9.00 A.M
0.0% 0.0%
3.0
5.0
7
5.0
739.6 (m2)
BEDROOM 1D OOM 1 DUNIT BEDROOM 1 FUNIT BEDROOM 1 10.9 7.6 FUNIT OOM BEDROOM 2 2 BEDROOM 2 10.5 8.9 BEDROOM 2 57.9 (m2) 39.6 m2) AREA ROOM FLOOR (m2) FLOOR ROOM AREA (m2) ROOM FLOOR AREA (m2) FLOOR AREA (m2) AREA
3.0
3.0
57.9 10.9 10.5 57.9
3.3
4.5
0.9 10.
5
10.
5
0.7 0.7
4.5 4.5
0.0% 0.4%
3.0 3.0
UNIT E 3.0
6.4
5
6.4
5
UNIT E
9.00 9.00 A.M A.M
19.5% 0.4%
9
2
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.4
5 5
UNIT E
5
39.6 31.8 ROOM57.9 FLOOR39.6 AREA ROOM (m2) FLOOR ROOM AREA (m2) FLOOR AREA (m2) BEDROOM 10.9 BEDROOM BEDROOM 9.9 7.6 7.6 UNIT E UNIT E UNIT E 8.9 8.9 10.5 BALCONY BALCONY 2.2 BALCONY 39.6 31.8 ROOM57.9 FLOOR39.6 AREA ROOM (m2) FLOOR ROOM AREA (m2) FLOOR AREA (m2) 2.8 2.8 1.4 BEDROOM BEDROOM 9.9 7.6 LIVING AREA BEDROOM LIVING10.9 AREA 7.6 11.0 LIVING AREA
3 8.7 3
3.0
0.0% 3.1%
4
8.5
8.5
8.5 4 F UNIT
8.5 4F UNIT
8.5
4
3.0
8.7
12.00 12.00 P.M P.M 8.5
UNIT F
3 8.7
2
5
3.0
3
0.0% 0.0%
8.7
3.0
3
3.0
12.00 12.00 P.M P.M
8.7
8.7
8.7 2
0.0%
3.0
3
3.0
12.00 P.M 12.00 P.M 6.9%
3.0
8.7
.57
3
3.0
1.6% 6.9%
3.0
8.7
8.7
2
.57
3
3.0
10 10
3.0
8.7
3
6
0.9
4.5
3.0
3.0
3.0 7FLOOR 7 57.9 m2) AREA ROOM FLOOR (m2) ROOM AREA (m2) ROOM FLOOR AREA (m2) FLOOR AREA (m2) AREA 8.7
0.9
3.7
3.0
10.
11.
9
8.7
4
5.0
7
3.0
8.7
8.5
4
5.0
3.0
3
10 .57
10
8.5
6
9.6 10. 2 6 .4 3.4 9.6 11. 2.4 9 3.4 0.9
3.4 9.6
3.0 0.9
10.
WINTER SUMMER
0.9
4.5
8.7
3 8.7 3
8.7
.57
.57 .57
3
10
8.7
3
12.00 12.00 P.M P.M
10
6%
8.7
9.6
9.00 A.M 9.00 A.M
0.6% 6.3%
4.5
0.9
2
4.5
WINTER SUMMER
3.0
8.7
6%
SUMMER WINTER 3.0
3.0
0.7 0.4storage space
2
8.9
0.9
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
57.9 10.9 10.5 57.9
57.9 10.9 10.5 57.9
12.00 12.00 P.M P.M
25.2% 3.1%
1
4 4
31.8 57.9 ROOM FLOOR31.8 AREA ROOM (m2) FLOOR ROOM AREA (m2) FLOOR AREA (m2) 9.9 F BEDROOM 1 9.9 BEDROOM 1 UNIT BEDROOM 1 10.9 UNIT UNIT F F BEDROOM 2 31.8 BEDROOM 2 ROOM BEDROOM 2 AREA (m2) 10.5 2.2 2.2 31.8 57.9 ROOM FLOOR AREA ROOM (m2) FLOOR AREA (m2) FLOOR
ONY BALCONY 11 BALCONY BALCONY 1.4 2.8 1.4 BALCONY 11 11.0 BALCONY 11 BALCONY 1.4 1.4 1.4 11 9.9 9.9 OOM BEDROOM 10.9 BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM11 10.9 10.9 10.9 BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 1 10.9 7.6 11.0 LIVING BALCONY 22 AREA 4.5 10.1 ONY 22 AREA 4.5 10.1 4.5 10.1 BALCONY 22 5.5 BALCONY BALCONY 22 4.5 4.5 4.5 OOM BEDROOM BEDROOM 2 LIVING BEDROOM 2 10.5 8.9 10.5 8.9 10.5 8.9 BEDROOM BEDROOM22 BEDROOM 10.5 10.5 10.5 BALCONY BALCONY 2.2 2.2 BALCONY 2.2 KITCHEN 5.5 KITCHEN 5.5 KITCHEN 8.5 8.5 4 4 KITCHEN KITCHEN 7.1 7.1 GONY AREA 12.9 12.9 LIVING AREA LIVING AREA AREA 12.9 12.9 12.9 AREA BALCONY 1 LIVING BALCONY BALCONY 1 1.4 2.8 1.4 2.8 1.4 2.8 BALCONY 1 11.0 BALCONY 1 LIVING BALCONY 1 1.4 1.4 1.4 BATHROOM 3.2 BATHROOM 3.2 3.2 LIVING12.9 AREA 7.1 LIVING AREA BATHROOM 11.0 11.0 LIVING AREA 2 2 3.3 BATHROOM BATHROOM 3.1 3.1 3.1 STORAGE ) STORAGE AREA (m ) STORAGE AREA (mSPACE SPACE AREA 3.3 (m2) EN 10.7 KITCHEN KITCHEN 2 KITCHEN 10.7 10.7 10.7 KITCHEN 10.7 LIVING LIVING 10.1 ONY 2 AREA BALCONY 2 AREA 10.7 4.5 10.1 4.5 10.1 4.5 SPACE BALCONY 2 3.3 BALCONY BALCONY 2 4.5 4.5 4.5 KITCHEN KITCHEN 5.5 5.5 KITCHEN 5.5 2 2 2 8.72 8.72 8.72 4.5 4.5 4.5 UNIT DEPTH (m) UNIT DEPTH (m) UNIT DEPTH (m) CE AREA (m ) ) ) STORAGE SPACE STORAGE AREA (m SPACE AREA (m UNIT F KITCHEN 1 BATHROOM 3.3 3.3 BATHROOM BATHROOM 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 KITCHEN 7.1 7.1 7.1 GROOM AREA LIVING AREA1 12.9 12.9 12.9 LIVING AREA1 3.2 LIVING AREA1 BATHROOM LIVING AREA1 12.9 12.9 12.9 BATHROOM BATHROOM 3.2 3.2 BATHROOM 3.0 3.0 (m) 3.0 10.57 10.57 10.57 FLOOR TO 2CEILING HEIGHT (m) HEIGHT FLOOR TO CEILING HEIGHT (m)FLOOR TO CEILING )UNIT DEPTH (m) UNIT P.M DEPTH (m) 2 2 0.0% 3.00 3.00 P.M 3.00 P.M 3.00 P.M 3.00 3.00 P.M P.M 3.00 P.M 3.00 P.M 3.00 3.00 P.M P.M 3 6.3% 6% 1.6% 4.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.3% BATHROOM 2 TO (m2) 3.7 ROOM 2 TO 3.7HEIGHT 3.7 BATHROOM 2 3.3 BATHROOM 2 KITCHEN BATHROOM 2 3.7 3.7 3.722.4% 3.3 3.3 BATHROOM BATHROOM 3.1 (m) 3.1 3.1 ) STORAGE ) ) STORAGE SPACE STORAGE AREA4.2% (mSPACE AREA (m SPACE AREA (m EN KITCHEN 10.7 10.7 10.7 KITCHEN KITCHEN 10.7 10.7 10.7 57.9 57.9 57.9 OOR ROOM AREA (m2) FLOOR AREA 3.0 3.0 3.0 LING FLOOR HEIGHT CEILING (m) FLOOR HEIGHT CEILING (m) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 8.72 8.72 8.72 4.5 4.5 4.5 UNIT DEPTH (m) UNIT DEPTH (m) UNIT DEPTH (m) CE AREA (m ) ) ) STORAGE SPACE STORAGE AREA (m SPACE AREA (m 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 AGE AREA1(m STORAGE SPACE AREA (mSPACE AREA (m SPACE AREA 3.3 (m ) ) 1STORAGE SPACE )1 AREA (m ) ) 1STORAGE )1 M 1(mSPACE BEDROOM 10.93.3 10.93.3 10.9 ROOM BATHROOM 3.3 1 STORAGE BATHROOM BATHROOM 3.3 3.3 -Recommended minimum bedroom size 10 sqm BATHROOM 3.0 = 3.0 DEPTH (m)3.0 10.57 FLOOR8.73 TO CEILING FLOOR HEIGHT TO CEILING (m)FLOOR HEIGHT TO CEILING (m) HEIGHT (m) )EPTH UNIT DEPTH (m) UNIT DEPTH (m)8.73 10.57 8.73 10.57 8.73 8.73 8.73 UNIT DEPTH (m) (m) UNIT UNIT DEPTH (m) UNIT DEPTH (m) ROOM 2 BATHROOM 2 3.7 3.7 3.7 BATHROOM 2 BATHROOM 2 BATHROOM 2 3.7 3.7 3.7 M 2 BEDROOM 2 10.5 10.5 10.5 3.0 3.0 LING FLOOR HEIGHT TO CEILING (m) FLOOR HEIGHT TO CEILING (m) 3.0HEIGHT 3.0 3.0must 3.0minimum 2 3.0 TO CEILING HEIGHT (m)3.0 (m) 3.0 IGHT TO 2CEILING (m)FLOOR HEIGHT (m) FLOOR TO CEILING FLOOR HEIGHT TO 2CEILING (m) FLOOR HEIGHT TO CEILING (m) spaces HEIGHT (m) received -Living room and private open hours of sunlight 2 2 2 3.2 3.2 SPACES RECEIVED 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2AND PRIVATE OPEN SPA -Recommended height =DOES 2.7 RECEIVED m PRIVATE SPACES DOES RECEIVED THE ROOM OPEN DOES THE LIVING ROOM AND ceiling PRIVATE OPEN SPACES THE LIVING ROOM STORAGE AND PRIVATESPACE OPENSTORAGE SPACES RECEIVED DOES THEAREA LIVING(m ROOM AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACES DOES RECEIVED THE LIVING ROOM AGE STORAGE AREA SPACE AREA (m2)AND PRIVATE1.4 AREA (m SPACE STORAGE SPACE AREA (m ) OPEN ) LIVING ) ) ) 1(mSPACE BALCONY 1 (m 1.4 1.4 in winter. YES YES NO NO YESIN WINTER? SEPP 65 + APARTMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES HT IN WINTER? MINIMUM OF SUNLIGHT IN WINTER? MINIMUM 2 HOURS OF SUNLIGHT IN WINTER? MINIMUM 2 HOURS OF SUNLIGHT IN WINTER? MINIMUM HOURS OF IN WINTER? MINIMUM SUNLIGHT 8.73 8.73 8.73 2 HOURS OF 8.73 EPTH (m) UNIT DEPTH (m)2 HOURS8.73 UNIT DEPTH (m)UNIT DEPTH (m) UNIT2 DEPTH (m)SUNLIGHT8.73 2TO CEILING BALCONY 2 CEILING 4.53.0 (m) 4.53.0 4.5 3.0 3.0 (m) 3.0 3.0 IGHT (m)FLOOR HEIGHT TO (m) HEIGHT FLOOR HEIGHT TO CEILING (m)FLOOR HEIGHT TO CEILING (m) HEIGHT -Recommended unit depth = 2-2.5 x ceiling height FLOOR TO CEILING -More than 70% of apartment units exposed to direct sunlight in winter. EA LIVING AREA 12.9 12.9 12.9 SEPP 65 65 APARTMENT + APARTMENTDESIGN DESIGNGUIDELINES GUIDELINES SEPP SEPP 65 APARTMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES KITCHEN 10.7 10.7 10.7
M 1 BATHROOM 1 3.3 M 2 BATHROOM 2 3.7 2 2 SPACE AREA (m SPACE AREA 3.2 (m2) ) STORAGE )
3.3 3.7 3.2
3.3 3.7 3.2
31
https://issuu.com/muhammadfaizalismail 40