EVALUATION

8 EVALUATION

The evaluation of this project can be done using the rubric provided.

1. Firstly, it is proposed to use the rubric for each student to assess the work they have done (self-assessment). 2. Secondly, it can also be used for the teacher ' s evaluation.

Students should be made aware of how to evaluate this project from the outset.

The maximum mark is 16, meaning that 16 is equivalent to a conventional 10, if everything is awless. The minimum mark is 4, which is equivalent to a conventional 2.5.

EVALUATION

Through this method, we aim to make the students aware of

their learning, their level of knowledge, their teamwork and their involvement and commitment in the tasks to be carried out.

According to Liarte, Laia Lluch Molins denes rubrics as a tool for assessment and, sometimes, for grading that allows for the detailed assessment of each of the competences: "It is an ideal instrument especially for assessing competences, since it allows for dissecting the complex tasks that make up a competence into simpler tasks distributedin agradualandoperative manner " .

https://www.educaciontrespuntocero.com/noticias/evaluar-con-rubricas/

https://cedec.intef.es/cedec-lanza-unnuevo-banco-de-rubricas-y-otrosdocumentos-asociados-al-proyecto-edia/

Cedec rubric bank:

Evaluation indicators

Knowledge gained (Individual)

Working with others (Individual)

Participation (Teamwork)

Participation (Individual)

EVALUATION

4 3 2

I understood the topic in depth and participated in all the reection activities.

I almost always listen to, share and support the efforts of others. I try to keep the group together by working as a team.

Members meet and discuss on a regular basis. All students contribute to the debate and listen respectfully. We all contribute equally to the work. I understood the topic in depth and participated in some reective activities.

I often listen, share and support the efforts of others. I do not cause " problems " in the group.

Members meet and comment regularly. Most of us contribute to the debate and most of us listen respectfully. Most of us contribute fairly to the work.

I worked well in the group, provided input and presented quality information. I seemed to understand the main points of the topic but did not participate in any reective activities.

Sometimes I listen, share and support the efforts of others, but sometimes I am not a good member of the group.

We had few team meetings. Some members contributed to the discussion and listened respectfully. Some of us contributed equally to the work.

I provided some information, but I was not clear in the information presented.

I made an excellent contribution, presented my work well and participated in everything.

1

I did not demonstrate an adequate understanding of the issue, nor did I engage in the reections.

I rarely listen to, share and support the efforts of others. I am not usually a good group member.

We did not have team meetings. Some team members did not contribute equally to the work.

I provided very little information throughout the project.

Points