N$3
SERVING THE COASTAL COMMUNITY SINCE 1958
NO6349
FRIDAY 2 MAY 2014
Tel +264 64 205 854/+264 64 461 866/Fax +264 64 204 813/+264 64 461 824/Website www.namibtimes.net
Fraud charge against
inside
Fishermen
forge ahead
Castro dropped Otis Finck
Photo by Otis Finck
Magistrate Vicky Nicolaidis denied to further remand Arrey and ordered the withdrawal of the case against the suspect. Public Prosecutor Eden Iyambo requested that the matter be withdrawn and ordered that Castro’s confiscated passport be returned to him after his lawyer Garoy September opposed a further remand due to lack of an audited report and submission of documents which exonerate the accused of any wrong doing was submitted by the Board of Directors over a month ago. Castro was arrested on 21 November and charged with committing fraud related to approximately N$9 million. He made his first court appearance last year on 22 November in the Wa l v i s B a y Magistrates court.
Agbortoko Castro Ayuk Arrey
Continues on page 2
Page 6
Photo by Otis Finck
A charge of fraud against former Cameroonian JCS Seafood Managing Director Agbortoko Castro Ayuk Arrey (45) was dropped on Tuesday due to lack of evidence.
Face to face with Face-K
STRENGTHENING TIES: Namibian Port Captain Lukas Kufuna exchanges details with
Turkish naval warship Gediz officer. The ship docked yesterday. This is the first visit of the Turkish Navy to the port of Walvis Bay. The public are welcome to view the boat from 10:00 to 12:00 and from 14:00 to 17:00 today.
EIA puts Botswana
Page 11
Dry Port operations on hold Venessa Dorcas Mhungu & Madelaine Laubscher
Construction work at the Botswana Dry Port commenced without the required Environmental Impact Assessment certification, a spokesperson in the Ministry of Environment and Tourism, told stakeholders attending a meeting at the Walvis Bay Municipality Wednesday. The meeting was convened following repeated complaints from residents living in 5th street a road opposite the facility riled by the amount of dust, noise from the rollers and concrete mixers, among others. Selma from the environment ministry said,” We need to explain how this operation should have been handled.
There is legislation that allows for sustainable development where the interested and affected parties concerns are addressed. The EIA meeting was supposed to take place before the construction started. This project is in contravention of the legislation.” Selma also said recommendations will be made to the ministry
Property in Perspective
not to approve the EIA week’s time. report already submit- Mr Mthulusi Lotshe ted for the operations Commercial Manager for approval until the Botswana Railways residents’ concerns are asked to comment on ARE WE HOMO SAPIENS ON A BACKWARD addressed andAS included the revelation made by MOVE TO LIVE IN SMALLER HISTORIC TYPE in theSHELTERS? report. the environment minisOver recent times I am amazed in She said the the residents try official said our the observing contrast between all the space versus proceeded the latest “tiny must vast be beautiful given Namibia time has company acsize” dwelling designs. Seemingly, we perhaps to read the report and cording to advice from have an enormous space shortage to provide respond soforthat their the project and shelter a huge, and I mean “huge”,engineer population or, may form we still the privilegeconsultant to have submissions partenjoyenvironment reasonable size dwellings with some outdoor living of thespace? final You report. to guide the organisasee,The the majority of us work at places where “optimised” and all reasonable or project willspace be is comtion on mandatory to each employee to pletedunreasonable in aboutspace twois allotted requirements. perform their job functions. Going home is where on page you wish to find space to get aContinues bit of a “breather” and 2
Page 14
Property in Perspective
Page 15 JJ van Zyl
Principal Anjo Estates
re-energised. Living a “good” life at home is important to all of us but, if you feel caught up “between four walls”, it has an adverse effect on your whole existence as a human which leads to changes in one's normal and natural behaviour patterns. Looking at some development designs of bulk housing complexes, I surmise one is underlying “forced/expected” to excessively narrow down one's rightful normal desires of a reasonable in- and outdoor living space whilst, developers might rather focus on optimum profitability, in a market with notable shortage of dwellings. Does a dwelling really have 3 bedrooms or do they mean 1 small bedroom (main) with 2 sleeping cubicles? Come on! – The human is a homo sapien meaning “wise man” not bird! As per a Ms. Pearlman's blog on the Internet, “birds were the original architects, creating fantastic and extreme examples of blobitecture and parametric design long before any architecture critic labelled these styles. They are also summa cum laude engineers, able to transform cheap, insubstantial building materials into the most durable and cosy of homes. All this without a single CAD rendering, which today's architecture students are helpless without.” However, besides biological- and other differences of a bird versus that of the human being, birds do not have the following: - a car to be parked outside, need for an outside BBQ, space at home to accommodate visitors inor outside, constant movement on their doorstep, unnecessary tension and quarrels with neighbours to move their cars or the offspring to be quiet, work all-day long in a limited space surrounded by others, etc. So, where am I heading? My plea is that, in future, Developers take more cognizance of what the normal average household would require to make their stay in and on the property appreciable. If I am a Developer I shall with my Architect like to, with each design, ask the question – “Will I, with my lifestyle, be prepared to stay in one of these dwellings in this complex for any period longer than 12 months and will it be a good investment in time to come for a buyer also easily resell able?”. I also sometimes wonder, how many of the officials that signoff the approval of such “Squeezed” Building Plans, live in similar complexes and have no objections? For example, in a given development, there should perhaps only be 5 Units instead of 6 Units and then rather up the price marginally of the 5 Units. Yes, the Developer might have to make slightly less profit but be honoured for having been compassionate. Therefore, my final next step is to plead from the Developers, Architects and Municipal Authorities to go back to the “drawing board” and bring back the human being with “normal lifestyles” into designs. As Developer, I would imagine to, with pride, “walk away” from my developed complex with a feeling that the future