ncfcatalyst.com | @ncfcatalyst
CATALYST
WALL PREVIEWS
SPRING BREAK pg.
pg.
10
5
MARCH 18 2015 VOLUME XXXVIII, ISSUE V
WHAT’S INSIDE
3
MARS ONE FINALIST
6
L A T YS R CRRIVE
12 FRIDAY THE 13TH TATTOOS
A student newspaper of New College of Florida
New changes to RA hiring process BY GIULIA HEYWARD In preparation for the next academic year, both new and returning students have signed up to endure the challenging process of becoming a resident advisor (RA). This year, however, administration has made several changes to the RA hiring process. Previously, becoming an RA involved a two-week period in which prospective RAs shadowed a current RA, including going on rounds and throwing a program. Residential Life opted to get Pariesa Young/Catalyst rid of this two-week process and the RA shadowing. B-Dorm RA and Catalyst staff member Colt Dodd opens a door for thesis student “This year we devoted a Saturday to Olive O’Meara. observing the first-time RA applicants “We had to fill out a pretty they are capable of,” Diaz said. “I feel complete certain tasks in group process extensive application. Then, based on that we got a well-rounded view of day,” third-year and current RA Adriana that, we were asked to participate in a applicants’ strengths and weaknesses Diaz said. “The other difference is that returning RAs had to give a presentation group day,” first-year and prospective from a variety of perspectives on group about how we helped build community RA Sara Gregory said. “The group day process day.” However, the changes have also in our interviews with no creative was full of team building or individual workshop activities where we were received criticism from those who feel limitations.” Prospective RAs are still observed by current RAs. Then, if we the shadowing aspect of the hiring evaluated based on academic, judicial made it past that, we had a formal process was essential. “The criticism I’ve heard has been and housing requirements. In order interview.” The new hiring process has been good criticism to hear,” Burr said. “What to qualify, students cannot be on academic probation or have a history praised for its efficiency and range of I’ve heard is one of the things that they liked about last year was having a of any behavioral problems with training activities. “I think both of these changes are mentor and having someone that they administration. Additionally, applicants must have lived on campus for at least useful because they allow applicants to could ask questions to. After being two semesters, allowing students to be assessed in a variety of ways that is continued on p. 11 not limited to one single facet of what qualify by the end of their first year.
Obamacare, still reviled by many, goes to Supreme Court again BY YADIRA LOPEZ The Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, was signed into law five years ago this month. Since then, it has been challenged in the House of Representatives more than 50 times and has already reached the Supreme Court once. Now the court is preparing to vote once again with King v. Burwell, a case that could cripple Obamacare through semantics alone. The plaintiffs have clung to a line in the bill – “[…] through an exchange established by the state” – to undermine the legitimacy of federally operated insurance exchanges and subsidies. The justices will decide whether the plaintiffs’ interpretation of the line is accurate. “[The challengers’] reading of the text makes no sense. It is taking words out of context versus reading it all taken together,” Elizabeth Wydra, chief counsel for the Constitutional Accountability Center, told U.S. News. A ruling in favor of the plaintiffs
would eliminate subsidies for Americans whose states did not set up their own exchange – that includes 34 states – while residents in the remaining states and the District of Columbia would remain unaffected. Pundits worry that a pro-plaintiff decision would only lead to a future “two-tiered society” brought on by the widening gap in coverage between both groups of states. According to a report by The New York Times, “If the court decides to limit federal tax credits the result could essentially be the creation of two American health care systems […] Americans could begin to have vastly different levels of access to care. It all depends on which America they happen to live in.” The division is roughly along party lines; a majority of the affected states are currently Republican-led, while those who opted to establish a state exchange are largely Democratic. Were the court to side with the
plaintiffs, millions of Americans would be left without subsidies, potentially rendering them unable to pay for insurance. The effect of a ruling against the federal government would not be limited to those who receive subsidies; individuals who buy their own insurance would also be affected. Health insurance premiums would likely soar since healthy individuals ineligible for subsidies would probably drop coverage, forcing insurance companies to increase rates in an effort to bring back revenue. Florida residents would be among those hit the hardest; an estimated 2 million people would lose subsidies by 2016. The state’s resistance to Obamacare was manifested earlier this month when Sarasota County was forced to shut down its primary care program by next year. State officials instructed the county to stop receiving annual federal funding that accounts for $1.9 million of the program’s budget. Without the
funding, and the “Federally Qualified Health Center” designation that comes with it, the program will be forced to dismantle itself after 35 years in operation. As many as 31,000 lowerincome residents will be affected. City Commissioner Christine Robinson called it a crisis. The Supreme Court’s decision on King v. Burwell is expected by late June. Supporters of Obamacare cite the justices’ siding with the federal government in a 2012 case as a positive sign, but skeptics point out that in that instance the votes were 5-4 – a slim margin. Experts say that the justices agreeing to hear the case in the first place is already an ominous sign. Information for this article was taken from www.kff.org, www.huffingtonpost. com, www.nytimes.com and heraldtribune.com