Foreword
i
We have a chequered history of application of research on, and management of, impacts of both natural and anthropogenic change on our land and water resources. Early on, in our country when we adopted the linguistic model of separation of states as administrative areas, we commenced the complete neglect of our basic natural life support resources - LAND and WATER. By doing so we de-recognised the value of whole-catchment as a unit of quantifying life support potential of a particular area of common micro and macro climatic conditions resulting in a spatial habitat capable of providing water and food chain linkages to sustain life…for the flora, fauna and therefore the human population as well. Degradation of this habitat has resulted in loss of vegetation which was holding the soils on hill slopes. Introduction of EP Act and the process of environmental clearance by the MoEF did bring to fore the importance of catchment area treatment. Similarly the existing rules under the forest act specifying the procedure for “Diversion of Forest Land for non forest use” did have adequate emphasis on the treatment of Catchment areas. However the focal point of the MoEF clearance is very project specific and it pays greater attention to management of “downstream” effects of specific water resource projects. In much the same manner the focus in a diversion proposal is on the cost benefit, compensatory afforestation provisions and on the budgetary provisions for the specified catchment area. A wide variety of issues, including riparian management, wetlands restoration, water allocation, groundwater abstraction, and green fields’ development, would benefit from an integrated approach to catchment management. Such an approach requires a cooperative effort among land owners, (both government and private), project developers, managers, and scientists; aided by a coordinated mix of process-oriented studies, environmental monitoring, and computer simulation. The focus of our current work in hand is on improving and protecting the soil and moisture regime of specific locale. We are focused on selected processes in Environmental Management Technologies that might be employed to this end. Some may question whether catchment management is really an “innovative” tool. Haven’t we employed catchment management approaches for decades? The answer would have to be yes. However, we never did think of planning on a basin level and execution on each micro watershed level. We never thought beyond the time tested procedures that were not terrain specific. We never did think of people’s participation as a catchment area treatment tool which could enhance and alter their livelihood patterns. ‘What is Comprehensive (Integrated) Catchment Management (ICM)?’ Integrated catchment management (ICM) can be thought of as both a research approach and as an organising philosophy. As a research approach, ICM recognises that the environment is a complex system of interacting resources – an “ecosystem” – operating within a landscape context. The landscape context that we most often consider is the catchment or watershed, in recognition of the central role of water as a critical resource and of catchments as a source of water. It is instructive to recall that it was not until relatively recently that Comprehensive CAT Plan of Satluj River Basin