COMPUTER APPLICATIONS AR-305
CLIMATE ANALYSIS REPORT SUBMITTED BYJUHI SRIVASTAVA (15110009) NIRBHAY SINGH (15110016)
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS Tiruchirapalli Latitude:10.77 N Longitude:78.72 E Elevation:85 m Climate zone – warm humid
Fig.1.1 Dehradoon Latitude:30.32 N Longitude:78.03 E Elevation:682 m Climate Zone : composite
Fig.1.2
PAGE 1
TEMPERATURE Fig.2.1
Fig.2.2 Tiruchipalli Here the temperature bars mostly lie above the comfort zone indicating that the temperature is mostly higher than the comfortable range
Fig.2.3 Dehradoon The position of temperature bars deviate from the comfort zone in both the dirctions i.e. The place experience high range of temperature across the year.
PAGEÂ 2
SKY COVER Fig.3.1
Tiruchipalli Mean annual sky cover is around 50-60 %. It is mostly clouded.
Fig.3.2
Fig.3.3 Dehradoon Here the mean annual sky cover lies in the range of 30-40 % .Hence the sky here is comparatively clearer.
PAGEÂ 3
WIND VELOCITY
Tiruchipalli
Fig.4.1
Dehradoon
Fig.4.2
INFERENCE There is drastic difference between the wind velocity of the two cities. Tiruchipalli has comparitively very high wind velocity however in dehradoon the highest recorded are even quite low.
PAGEÂ 4
3D TEMPERATURE CHART
Fig.5.1 Tiruchipalli
Fig.5.2
Dehradoon
Fig.5.3
INFERENCE The temperature range is mostly 27 to 38 in tiruchirapalli however in dehradoon temperature goes down to as low as 0 deg C
PAGEÂ 5
DESIGN STRATEGIES
Tiruchipalli Major contributing design strategies are
Fig.6.1
Cooling and dehumidification 73.6 % Sun shading of windows 33.1 %
Dehradun Major contributing design strategies are
Fig.6.2
Cooling 25% ( Air conditioning can be reduced if design minimizes over-heating )Â Internal heat gain 22.9% (Hence insulation is required for winters) Sun shading of windows 20.1% (Glazing on south facade for winter sun with overhangs to cut-off summer sun) Passive solar direct gain high mass 12% (High mass interior surfaces feel naturally cool on hot days and reduce day-night temperature swings) Heating 11.5% Fan forced ventilation cooling 11%
PAGEÂ 6
WIND WHEEL
Tiruchipalli The prominent wind direction is from south west and mostly hot winds.
Dehradoon Here the wind direction is nearly opposite and the wind is cold.Â
Fig.7.1
Fig.7.2
PAGEÂ 7
FACADE ANALYSIS TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT West facade
Fig.8.1
SOLAR TOOL MODELEXISTING Horizontal over hangs – 600 mm Vertical louvers – 700mm (7 no.) at 120 degree angle to horizontal clockwise
Fig.8.2
PAGE 8
INTERVENTIONS
Fig.9.1- PROPOSED 1
Horizontal over hangs – 600 mm (2 no.) Vertical louvers – 700mm (5 no.) at 60 degree angle to horizontal clockwise
Fig.9.2-PROPOSED 2
Horizontal over hangs – 600 mm (2 no.) Vertical louvers – 600mm (2 no.) PAGE 9
SEASONAL OPTIMUM SHADING EXISTING MODEL WINTER
Fig 10.1 SUMMER
Fig.10.2
PAGEÂ 10
SEASONAL OPTIMUM SHADING PROPOSED MODEL 1 WINTER
Fig.11.1 SUMMER
Fig.11.2
PAGEÂ 11
SEASONAL OPTIMUM SHADING PROPOSED MODEL 2 WINTER
Fig.12.1 SUMMER
Fig.12.2
PAGE 12
EFFECTIVE SHADING COEFFICIENTS EXISTING MODEL
Fig.13.1 PROPOSAL 1
Fig.13.2
The shading coefficients of existing shading device is higher in winter and lower in summer To have optimum shading shading coefficient should be more in summer and less in winter Alternative 1 does exactly what needed for a particular building. It brings sufficient light and shade in summer and optimum comfort in winters
PAGE 13
FACADE ANALYSIS ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT WEST FACADE
Fig.14.1 ECOTECT MODEL
Fig.14.2
Vertical louvers of 600 mm length and height runs along the windows. 1 horizontal over hang of 500 mm PAGEÂ 14
PASSIVE GAINS BREAKDOWN DOUBLE BRICK CAVITY PLASTER
U value- 1.45 Solar absorption-0.55
Fig.15.1
GAINS BREAKDOWN - All Visible Thermal Zones FROM: 1st January to 31st December CATEGORY LOSSES GAINS ------------ ------- -----FABRIC 47.0% 14.5% SOL-AIR 0.0% 17.2% SOLAR 0.0% 0.0% VENTILATION 26.1% 8.1% INTERNAL 0.0% 48.2% INTER-ZONAL 26.9% 12.1%
Fig.15.2
PAGE 15
PASSIVE GAINS BREAKDOWN BRICK PLASTER
Fig.16.1
GAINS BREAKDOWN - All Visible Thermal Zones FROM: 1st January to 31st December CATEGORY LOSSES GAINS ------------ ------- -----FABRIC 63.7% 21.2% SOL-AIR 0.0% 52.0% SOLAR 0.0% 0.0% VENTILATION 7.1% 2.3% INTERNAL 0.0% 14.0% Fig.16.2 U value – 2.62 Solar Absorption – 0.41
PAGE 16
PASSIVE GAINS BREAKDOWN Concrete block plaster
Fig.17.1
GAINS BREAKDOWN - All Visible Thermal Zones FROM: 1st January to 31st December CATEGORY LOSSES GAINS ------------ ------- -----FABRIC 61.4% 17.7% SOL-AIR 0.0% 42.5% SOLAR 0.0% 0.0% VENTILATION 16.9% 4.9% INTERNAL 0.0% 29.1% INTER-ZONAL 21.7% 5.8%
Fig.17.2
U value – 0.7 Solar absorption – 0.50
PAGE 17
PASSIVE GAINS BREAKDOWN Comparative Analysis
Absolute heat gain through conduction in Brick plaster >> Concrete block plaster > Double brick cavity plaster Absolute heat gain through SOL-AIR in Brick plaster >> Concrete block plaster >>Double brick cavity plaster Absolute Internal heat gain in Brick plaster >> Concrete block plaster >>Double brick cavity plaster U value of brick plaster is greater than other two, That's why all conduction values are higher in brick Solar heat gain independent of U-value , That's why it is constant. PAGE 18
FABRIC GAINS (QC + QS) DOUBLE BRICK CAVITY PLASTER Double brick cavity plaster U- 1.45, Solar absorption – 0.55
Fig18.1
Fig.18.2
Fig.18.3
PAGE 19
FABRIC GAINS (QC + QS) Brick Plaster U- 2.6, Solar absorption -0.41
Fig.19.1
Fig.8.1
Fig.19.2
PAGEÂ 20
FABRIC GAINS (QC + QS) Concrete block plaster
U – 0.7, Solar absorption – 0.51
Fig.20.1
Fig.20.2
INFERENCES U value of brick is greater among all three.Thats why the Fabric gain occurs in Brick plaster >> Concrete block plaster > Double brick cavity plaster
PAGE 21
INSOLATION Material - brick West Facade
-exposure to the sun's rays. -the amount of solar radiation reaching a given area.
PAGEÂ 22
INSOLATION Material - brick West Facade
Average Daily values
Amount of solar radiation on exposed area is much grater than that on the unexposed area. Values on unexposed surface are nearly constant.
PAGEÂ 23
INSOLATION Material - brick West Facade
AVG HOURLY VALUES
Month - December
Month - May
INSOLATION IN MAY > DEC PAGE 24
BUILDING ANALYSIS Location : Roorkee, Uttarakhand Lat / Long : 29.85 N, 77.88 E Building Type : Residential
PAGE 25
BUILDING ANALYSIS Location : Roorkee, Uttarakhand Lat / Long : 29.85 N, 77.88 E Building Type : Residential
Wall conduction has the maximum impact on power consumption Increasing the wall insulation and glazing u factor to 3 panel decreses the power consumption to 60 kw. PAGE 26
DAYLIGHT ANALYSIS
10th December, 10 am
Location : Roorkee, Uttarakhand 10th may , 10 am
Rooms having south facade experience maximum daylight Glazed facade increases the daylight factor and similarly day lighting PAGEÂ 27
ALTERNATIVE ROOF AND PLAN FORM
Building Type : Residential
Location : Shimla
Location :Â New Delhi
With the same wall material's properties New Delhi has more power consumption than Shimla due to its extreme climatc conditions as well as more humid environment. Adding vertical louvers has significant impact on reducing heating load PAGEÂ 28
LOCATION : SHIMLA
Location :Â New Delhi
On increasing the wall and floor insulation and glazing u factor to 3 panel the power consumption witnessed a huge change to 72 KW from 117 KW particularly possible in Hilly Areas.
PAGEÂ 29
DAYLIGHT ANALYSIS
Location : Shimla
10th December, 10 am
10th may , 10 am
Having Courtyard increases the daylighting tremendously. In Winters we experience more daylight than summers. Most of the spaces are in comfortable zone with sufficient daylight. PAGEÂ 30
PAGE 31
PAGE 31
THANK YOU