AFT LOCAL 1839 PROFESSIONAL STAFF NEWSLETTER CONTENTS
FROM THE EDITOR
• • • • •
Dean Brianik
FROM THE EDITOR EDITORIAL My Experience with an “Active Shooter” Around the US: Reporting Frauds Workplace Lawsuits May Be on the Rise
Professional Staff Advisory Committee/Editorial Board • Dean Brianik • Venida Rodman • Sachie Tsumura-Tmart • Cynthia Vazquez • Naomi Wright • Allison Thornton, Graphic Designer
EDITORIAL A pair of articles came have been published in the past few months and they have a direct bearing to the goings-on here at NJCU. Both articles (in Aeon Essays and The Chronicle of High Education) talk about a constant need for businesses and universities (which are becoming one and the same) to innovate. Yet, both articles note while innovation is lauded, very little attention is given to the less glamorous work of maintaining the innovations so they remain useful and fixing them when these brilliant “new ideas’ don’t work out as planned. Unfortunately, NJCU has become addicted to this search for innovation and technology is the University’s mantra. Technology, be it older like something called PlacePro or something newer like
SPRING/SUMMER 2017
This recently happened to me. Has it happened to you? I’m on a five-year contract. For the last two cycles, the re-appointment process coincided with my five and ten year wedding anniversaries. 2017 happens to fall on a 10-year anniversary for me. However, last fall, the re-appointment paperwork I should have received, didn’t come. When I asked Human Resources, I was told I’ll get my re-appointment papers in September. Once I reminded them again that THIS was my re-appointment year, I was told HR made a “mistake.” How many others of you have received similar “mistakes?” If this has happened to you, please let Sam know at extension 2216. We need to see how many of us are in the same boat and what we can do about it. For those of you who don’t fall under this year’s re-appointment process, double-check your “multi-year calendar” in writing. Don’t let HR make a “mistake” with YOUR future. Forgive me for being suspicious. I can’t help but wonder if the Administration is pulling a fast one. In prior re-appointments, if someone was not kept on, they had a year to put their affairs in order and find new employment. As it stands now, if I’m not reappointed next year, I’ll be out on June 30th, just a few weeks after the Board of Trustees say I’m no longer welcome. In fairness, our President, Dr. Henderson, is going through a similar re-appointment process. What I’d like to know is: if she is not re-appointed, will she get that extra year to put her affairs in order? If yes, why aren’t professional staff employees who have served New Jersey City University far longer than her, worthy of the same consideration? “Student Success” packages, require heavy amounts of data input in order to do their job. The end result is college educated professionals like us, many with Master’s Degrees or above, becoming glorified data clerks and are less able to spend time with students who really need our help. As an example, like many places where you’ll find professional staffers, Cooperative Education’s, success relies heavily on developing personal connections with students and others. The software it has, Place Pro, is useful as an archive and operates pretty much the same way that newspaper want ads have functioned for decades. The ironic part is that all of the top internships placers in this office’s history (Andy, Ray, and Peggy) were the ones who were most “technically challenged”. They owed their success not to data entry, but
by teaching students how to get ready for the job market and then introducing them to employers who would give them the first jobs in their chosen field. It seems that the administration is overemphasizing data and creating nit picking management techniques at the expense of serving students. A certain amount of data entry is always needed. So, too, are basic procedures. But when managers and administrators let regulations run amok (like telling employees how often each day they must check in with the boss or criticizing how an employee looks) that is demeaning to employees who have devoted themselves to serving our students. All it “manages” to do is drive down employee morale. Dean Brianik Founder, Editor-in-Chief, The In Box
1