NZ Video News February 2012

Page 1

FEBRUARY 2012

Vol 177

Sony F3 User Report The wise ones know that it’s not the machinery but “how you use it” that counts. Having a bigger sensor than your mates is not a guarantee of a better picture, is also true. For one man’s views on the best way to use the Sony F3, accompanied by Chris Barr from DVT, I went to Cloud South Films to see Tom Burstyn, director / cinematographer. Ed: Tom, we’re here because you’ve made a purchase from DVT recently of an F3. Are you happy? Tom: Yes, I love the camera; I think it’s great. Having said that, I think all these cameras are disposable. I think they’re good until the next generation comes along. I change my camera every other generation, before it loses too much value and the next new one makes a difference in the quality. Ed: What were you using before the F3? Tom: I had an EX1 before that, and before that I had a Z1. Ed: What made you go for the F3, because obviously this is quite a different format camera? Tom: The sensor size. My career, for the better part of my last 40 years, has been in film; it’s 35mm, so I have a much better sense of the perspective of the 35mm lens than those tiny little half inch and third inch chips where everything’s in focus and everything’s a wide angle. Ed: Is that always a bad thing? Tom: No, not a bad thing … look, for Citizen Kane, Gregg Toland, one of the greatest cinematographers of all time, spent vast amounts of time and money lighting sets so he could shoot at f16 and all we have to do now to accomplish that is use a little teeny camera in the dark. But it’s the modern aesthetic also – everybody’s used to shallow depth of field and close-ups that are done with a longer lens so that everything’s nice and fuzzy around the background. Ed: So for you, that move from the EX1 and the Z1 – what are essentially video cameras, now you’ve gone to a cinematographic camera. So it is a big change isn’t it, there is a big difference?

Tom and Chris with the F3.

Tom: Well the big difference in the HD formats for me is lens perspective. I think the first project I did on an HD camera was one of the first Sony 900s, that big amazing four foot camera. Now there’s an incredibly clumsy device. I complained to Sony and they said that they needed to get the camera out fast, so they just put the guts of whatever HD technology they were developing into a news camera; and whatever it was sat on your shoulder and had the tape deck on it, and then you put a cinezoom on the front of it. Trust me, you cannot go through a doorway sideways on a dolly. Ed: But surely there’s a big workflow difference between a video camera and a cinematographic camera? Tom: I’ll preface my answer by explaining that I wear two hats. My day job, or what I’ve been doing for the last 40 years, is as a director of photography on feature films and television dramas and in that field I’ve always used 35mm cameras and recently large format HD cameras. The F900 was a two-thirds inch and so was the Viper, so that’s like 16mm, and recently the RED and the Alexa and

NZVN on the web. Go to <https://sites.google.com/site/nzvideonews> for more news. P14 Media Predictions P21 New News Sets at TVNZ P27 Film is not Dead P31 Precious Product

DISPLAY & CLASSIFIED ADVERT BOOKINGS BY WED 29 FEB ADVERT COPY BY FRI 2 MARCH UP ON THE WEB BY FRI 9 MARCH


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.