NOVEMBER 2016
Vol 230
Dedo Explains Light We are at Dedolight for more indepth light discussions with Dedo Weigert. It's a very one sided "discussion" but I try. Ed: Sir, I have just two questions for you this time, perhaps with a third that I’ll cuve in at the end. The first one comes from what we’ve just been talking about, and that is the understanding of the light that an image collector is using. You have in my mind 3 choices – you can trust a meter, you can trust what the camera is seeing, or you can trust what your eye is seeing. Could you discuss those 3 options? Dedo: Don’t worry about any of them. The only thing that counts is the end result. Like in the old film days, the only thing that really counts is what’s up on the screen and whatever you see by your eye has not that much to do with what the digital image sees. What will be created or mucked up in postproduction is another matter … that is something that we always had. We always had the colourist who could influence greatly the mood of it; we had the lab that could influence the chemistry of how the soup was from normal to standard – to substandard many times – even to Chem-Tone at TVC in New York. That was chemical post flashing that changed the world for me and I had to learn to light differently because the reaction of the emulsion became different. So the only thing that counts is the end result and the only thing through the mind of a cameraman is how good it looks, how good are the skin tones, and if we have lights, light sources or lighting instruments that can even withstand the most critical test; that is mixing traditional light sources, like halogen with LEDs, without showing different results on skins, different skin, Scandinavian skin, Mexican, Ethiopian, Angolan, from the brightest palest to the darkest, because they also react differently. And if you can make it match on many different sensors, because that is a problem that we’ve
had for a long time and to some extent that still persists, that sensors of different manufacturers or within the realm of the same manufacturer, the differences are so that you get diverging results, and if we can make that match between what LED light we have and a reference light. Reference light for us could be halogen with full spectrum at 3000K or 3200K or 3400K. A daylight reference light is harder to find, because daylight in nature is very hard to define, but we use – because it is widely used and accepted as an international standard – the Kino Flo T12 tube, the fat one for daylight, which is terrible … it’s spikey and everything, but it’s the best