KADK BACHELOR ARCHITECTURE ANATOMY & FABRICATION 2015 by Architecture's Anatomy and Fabrication

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation Institute of Architecture and Technology

Contents

Introduction page 4 / 143 Postcards page 14 / Semester Projects page 38 / 5 Days in Belgium page 86 / 6 Simple Houses page 96 / Tectonic Translations page 136 / Housing in the Gaps of the City page 144 / 27 Models in 1:33 page 152 / Pop-Up at LETH & GORI page 174 / Credits page 184

Introduc

tion

The Program The course ‘Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication’ (AAF) is a six semester Bachelor program at the Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, School of Architecture. The course follows an ideology of architecture as a framework for ways of living, and that ways of living create traces found in architecture. There is a mutual but complex relationship between these notions, in which students of architecture are often unconsciously stimulated and driven by. In confrontation with the study of architecture, a phenomenological experience must be qualified and cultivated conceptually, and consequently made operational through production. To fabricate architecture that promotes the best living conditions, one must constantly study, dissect, reconstruct and improve its many components and forms of expression – its anatomy.

This BA program revolves around three focal points.

1: Critical Reflection A crucial ideology fostered within the course is in the committed focus for students to create and nurture an informed point of view. To achieve this, one must understand architectural theory and history in depth. One must constantly be in dialogue with elements that are more enlightened and experienced than one’s self. The tools and forms of representation are not neutral – they influence the project profoundly. The inherent conventions and characteristics of representation must be acquired, challenged and developed in the studio, workshop and auditorium. It is through this methodology of creation and in the act of making, that architecture becomes open to new discoveries.

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 6 – 7

2: Tectonics and Case Studies

3: Context and Forms of Life

There is a direct relationship between the way an architectural project is conceived, the way it will be built and its viability. Students explore and create tectonic principles and their mutual metamorphosis through work with specific materials. The study of both existing and unrealised projects represent a central platform regarding both didactic methods and research questions. The course focuses on a multitude of diverse aspects - from forms of life, spatial features, hierarchies and relationships, parts of the whole, components of structures, proportions, cladding materials to details. The results are mapped and represented as a means to capture the buildings anatomy, atmosphere and cohesiveness. This working method contributes to a common archive, ‘wunderkammer’ and frame of reference, but is primarily intended to gradually establish an architectural hierarchy and language in order for students to form an individual architectural standpoint from an informed basis.

An important parameter within the course is in the mapping of empathy and engagement as a defining parameter within a context. How does the user perceive this structure? What are our intentions? What spatial potentials are facilitated through this method, in speculation of future opportunities and ways of life? The complexity of the ordinary is unpacked in depth to avoid unnecessary complication or confusion. Is the answer condensation or transformation? What is the economy of the project within a broad perspective and how fast a metabolism are we dealing with? Drawing upon knowledge beyond individual experiences and horizons, the ability for cities and buildings to house and absorb alternating programs is identified and challenged.

The assignments are consistently based on specific study sites and as a result, students are faced early on with real architectural issues, which are identified, scaled and deployed spatially. Knowledge of materials and building elements are embedded in the tasks and acquired gradually; staircase, door, window, foundation, pillar, roof, facade, wall, deck, floor, ceiling, installations, mechanics, profiles, brackets, etc. This book seeks to unfold the events that took place during the 4th semester within 2nd year of the Bachelor program at IBT, from mid-March to the end of June 2015. The ambition is to give an insight into the way we attempt to qualify the above mentioned three focal points and their integration into the daily teaching and research practice.

In August 2014, KADK began a new curriculum

Within this new structure, the Bachelor program â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Architectureâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Anatomy & Fabricationâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; is focused around six different subject fields, one for each semester.

1st semester Architecture and Settlement 2nd semester Architecture and Organisation 3rd semester Architecture and Materials 4th semester Architecture and Aesthetics 5th semester Architecture and Practices 6th semester Architecture and Project

The learning goals according to the curriculum for the 4th semester are: # Knowledge and understanding of aesthetic paradigms, alongside their relevance and development within architectural history, theory and practice. Knowledge on the aesthetic and the sensuous as the basis for recognition. # Skills in analogue and digital sketching, drawing, shadow and light, alongside analogue and digital 3D modeling and the use of digital programs for advanced image processing and rendering. # Competencies in the handling of aesthetic investigations, programs and proposals in relation to architectural work production.

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 8 – 9

The brief with specific content description for the 4th semester at Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication according to the teaching plan is:

1: Case Study

2: Semester Assignment

3: Study Trip

- Thresholds Based on dissection of residential architectural thresholds between public and private, the spatial relations between zones are examined.

– The House in the City / The City in the House With ‘Housing’ being the overall programmatic framework, each student develops a program through which spatial intervals and tectonic relations are studied simultaneously at different scales. Concepts such as the complexity of the ordinary, the ugly and the beautiful, the familiar and the unknown, the public and the private, accessibility, density and daylight, skeleton, body and cladding are explored. Building anatomy such as deck, wall, facade, montage and installations also play a role.

– Housing and Daylight In light of the specialised interests that the assignment identifies, the study is focused around the relationship between the city and the human body, as well as the building stock as a mass versus light.

The 4 th Semester - a Double Program Karsten Gori, Anders Krogdal Nielsen and Nini Leimand

The 4th semester is based upon the invitation to visit an internationally practicing architect or architect office, somewhere in the world, whose work stands out with a spatial strength and appears to be in a dialogue with the program ‘Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication’. The inspiration for this double program is a similar process to the collaboration between the Spanish architectural office Flores Prats, studio LETH & GORI and Department 2 at KADK, which took place during the school year 2013/2014. This year we contacted the Belgian architectural office De Vylder Vinck Taillieu (DVVT) and we cannot thank them enough for accepting our invitation! Our first introduction to the work of Jan de Vylder was in a lecture he gave in 2009. The theme of the lecture series was

‘Dwelling Space’, developed by architect and PhD student Stine Henckel Schultz. What made a profound impression on us was Jan de Vylder’s drawings made with a BIG blue pencil! There is a headstrong connection between the way DVVT construct drawings, the way their buildings are constructed and the atmosphere that is embedded in the constructed spaces. With students acting as research assistants, we attempted to unfold the nature between these connections. The semester began with an individual case study and constructed drawings of the students homes, focusing on its relationship to common or public spaces such as the hallway and the front door to the city. In preparation for the collaboration with DVVT, the students emulated the fascinating drawing techniques and forms of representation that this

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 10 – 11

studio has developed over the years. This resulted in a collection of drawings that were informed by the uttermost private spaces of an individual and yet constructed through the technique of another. The objective of this double program is to allow for a simultaneous ‘transport’ of DVVT’s physical and realised projects through a study trip, along with a mental ‘transport’, which entails an exchange of views and ideas developed within an architectural production - found within the students work at KADK and through case studies of Danish residential architecture. A series of public exhibitions proved to be important milestones during the 4th semester. The first exhibition was launched during the study trip to Belgium in May 2015, in connection to the one day workshop in the production studios in Ghent, designed by DVVT for Les Ballets C de la B & LOD (2003-2008). The case study drawings were reduced to the size of a standard postcard, placed in our suitcases and transported to Ghent, where they were displayed on the black dance floor of the studio and appreciated as a gesture from our students to DVVT, directly before Jan de Vylder gave us all an unforgettable lecture. The second half of the lecture served as a first glimpse into what was to take place at the ‘Not Yet Summer School’ exhibition at KADK in June, showcased after the semester project hand-in and critique. DVVT produced six pamphlets with drawings and photos of six of their houses and 15 copies of each pamphlet. After a nourishing soup at the roof terrace on top of Les

Ballet, students each selected a pamphlet of the house they felt most inspired by at the morning lecture. Before leaving to experience the six houses in scale 1:1, Jan de Vylder and Inge Vinck encouraged the students to study, dissect, reconstruct and improve the selected houses of DVVT. They argued for the obvious value of copying good architecture. Historically, this method has been a highly esteemed driving force in art academies where students copied the great masters. However, as the work of DVVT is so rich, yet subtly and willfully peculiar, it seemed impossible to simply copy their work without engaging and decoding their vocabulary. One must engage in a real dialogue with them. Their work is simultaneously ordinary and unique, but instead of mapping the scene to create a clear strategy, it appears that they receive nourishment from all the inevitable but unforeseen aspects that any building project is so richly confronted with. Fundamental supporting elements are oversized and celebrated with characteristic colours. The filling of old but often simultaneously constructed openings are not hidden but instead, celebrated in a strange block masonry based on yet another format of blocks. Beams are not distributed in equal distances but react to many logics. These seemingly endless but nuanced and fruitful discussions seem to qualify their work, leaving one with an inspiring and straightforward feeling of dealing with both art and everyday life. One could argue that the architectural intentions of DVVT are too complex and bizarre for 2nd year students, but on the contrary, we experienced great energy at KADK, where multi-story housing

projects were guided by very personal agendas. The next exhibition was held in the showroom of the architecture office LETH & GORI in Absalonsgade, Copenhagen in September 2015. Students exhibited their 1:33 models and 143 postcards from the workshop in June titled ‘The Not Yet Summer School’. As shown, these models are not abstract, but models with an awareness of the reality that architecture is composed of different elements. This book is the next baton in a relay race that summarises this educational cooperation. We intend to distribute this to the next architecture office that might be interested to engage in a similar cooperation. We have been asked to exhibit selected material from this cooperation in 2016 under the title ‘Double Program’, with an aim to unfold the discussion between the architect or practice’s works and the students projects. This will take place at a joint exhibition with six other international projects at KADK, all of which received support from a pool managed by the chancellors of artistic educations, RKU. We are in many ways inspired by the new structure at KADK, and most notably in the encouraged cooperation amongst practice based teachers and researchers with common interests. It is about promoting an investigative and experimental practice where the immersion in the fabrication of drawings, models and buildings contributes to individual and collective knowledge.

Participants A collaboration between The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts School of Architecture (KADK), The Institute of Architecture and Technology (IBT), Architectureâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Anatomy and Fabrication (AAF), 4th Semester Students, Architecten De Vylder Vinck Taillieu, Inge Vinck, Jo Taillieu, Jan de Vylder, Max Kesteloot, LETH & GORI, Karsten Gori, Nini Leimand, Sebastian Skovsted, Sander Rutger, Anders Krogdal Nielsen, Johannes Schotanus and Jens Frederiksen.

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 12 – 13

Tutors

Students

Anders Krogdal Nielsen Mette Jerl Jensen Karsten Gori Nini Leimand Marianne Ingvartsen Morten Vedelsbøl Poul Høilund de Cruise Daniel Baumann

Adrian Hildrum Agnes Josefin Hekla Agnete Winsnes Astrup Anine Kildal Haneseth Anna Friis Nordtoft Anna Elisabeth Rosendahl Asser Vadstrup Carla Logo-Kofoed Caroline Mathilde Crüger Ahm Casper Phillip Ebbesen Christian Nørbjerg Christine Arctander Dennis Anderson Emil Felix Asger Fromberg Emilie Ørgård Posniak Hansen Frederik Kastrup Østerberg Frederik Rolighed Christensen Helene Anker Rasmussen Ida Overgaard Carnera Jens Alexander Jensen Jeppe Lorentsen Jonathan Pihl Petersen Julia Strömland Julie Hvid Petersen Karolina Werling Katrine Støa Kim Anouti Pörösei Line Falborg Sejr Lovisa Swärd Magnus Gundersen Lihn Maja Rosenkvist Hansen Marie Holst Lorenzen Markus Larsen

Mathilde Lo Nielsen Mathilde Schelde Pedersen Martine Grotenborg Mikkel Lux Larsen Morten Hedegaard Kristensen Morten Ryborg Larsen Nanna Dyrberg Larsen Nele Lehmann Christensen Nicolai Duckert Perrild Peder Lodding Pernille Hornung Bahn Rikke Stålem Sandbugt Signe Bay Bøgh Larsen Salem Samih Charabi Simen Sorthe Sixten Juel Ditlefsen Syed Hasan Abbas Shah Søren Bang Tone Ida Vecht Viktor Rolf Olesen Yngvild Wormdal Lund Tanya Gudmestad Thorbjørn Lønberg Petersen

143 Pos

tcards

143 Postcards â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;The House in the City / The City in the Houseâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Each student draws an elevation of their front door, a section through their building and an axonometric of their apartment. The result was printed on 143 postcards and exhibited at The Ballet Center designed by DVVT.

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 16 – 17

Emil Fromberg The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

EMIL FROMBERG, 2015

Architectureâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 18 – 19 Pernille Hornung Bahn The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

PERNILLE HORNUNG BAHN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Yngvild Wormdal Lund The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

Tone Ida Vecht Viktor Rolf Olesen

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

YNGVILD LUND, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

TONE IDA VECHT, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

VIKTOR ROLF OLESEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

YNGVILD LUND, 2015

TONE IDA VECHT, 2015

VIKTOR ROLF OLESEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

YNGVILD LUND, 2015

TONE IDA VECHT, 2015

VIKTOR ROLF OLESEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Thorbjørn Lønberg Petersen

THORBJØRN PETERSEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

SIMEN SORTHE, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

THORBJØRN PETERSEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Simen Sorthe

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

SIGNE BAY BØGH LARSEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

SIGNE BAY BØGH LARSEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

SIMEN SORTHE, 2015

SIGNE BAY BØGH LARSEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Signe Bøgh Bay Larsen

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 20 – 21

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Rikke Sandbugt The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

RIKKE SANDBUGT, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

RIKKE SANDBUGT, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Pernille Hornung Bahn The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

PERNILLE HORNUNG BAHN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

PERNILLE HORNUNG BAHN, 2015

Mikkel Lux Larsen The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

MIKKEL LUX LARSEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

MIKKEL LUX LARSEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Institute of Architecture and Technology Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

RIKKE SANDBUGT, 2015

PERNILLE HORNUNG BAHN, 2015

MIKKEL LUX LARSEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Martine Grothenborg

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

MARKUS LARSEN, 2015

MAJA ROSENKVIST HANSEN, 2015

MARTINE GROTENBORG, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

MARKUS LARSEN, 2015

MAJA ROSENKVIST HANSEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

MARTINE GROTENBORG, 2015

MARKUS LARSEN, 2015

MAJA ROSENKVIST HANSEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Maja Rosenkvist Hansen

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

MARTINE GROTENBORG, 2015

Markus Larsen

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 22 – 23

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

Magnus Gundersen Lihn The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

MAGNUS LIHN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Lovisa Swärd Line Falborg Sejr The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

LINE SEJR, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

MAGNUS LIHN, 2015

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

LOVISA SWÄRD, 2015

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

LINE SEJR, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and TechnologyThe Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts,

Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

MAGNUS LIHN, 2015

LOVISA SWÄRD, 2015

LINE SEJR, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Kim Anouti Pörösei

KIM PÖRÖSEI, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

KIM PÖRÖSEI, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

KATRINE STØA, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

KIM PÖRÖSEI, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Katrine Støa

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

KATRINE STØA, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

KATRINE STØA, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Karolina Werling

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 24 – 25

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

KAROLINA WERLING, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

KAROLINA WERLING, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

KAROLINA WERLING, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Julie Hvid Petersen JULIE HVID, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

JULIA STRÖMLAND, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

JEPPE LORENTSEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

Julia Strömland

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

JULIA STRÖMLAND, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

JULIE HVID, 2015

JULIA STRÖMLAND, 2015

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

JEPPE LORENTSEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Jeppe Lorentsen

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Ida Overgaard Carnera

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

IDA CARNERA, 2015

HASAN SHAH, 2015

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

IDA CARNERA, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

HASAN SHAH, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

HASAN SHAH, 2015

FREDERIK ROLIGHED CHRISTENSEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Frederik Rolighed Christensen

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

IDA CARNERA, 2015

Hasan Shah

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 26 – 27

1:50

Dennis Anderson Christine Arctander Christian Minor

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

DENNIS ANDERSSON, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

CHRISTINE ARCTANDER, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

CHRISTIAN MINOR, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

DENNIS ANDERSSON, 2015

CHRISTINE ARCTANDER, 2015

CHRISTIAN MINOR, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Institute of Architecture and Technology Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

DENNIS ANDERSSON, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

CHRISTINE ARCTANDER, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

CHRISTIAN MINOR, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Casper Phillip Ebbesen

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

ASSER VADSTRUP, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

AGNETE ASTRUP, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

CASPER PHILLIP EBBESEN, 2015

ASSER VADSTRUP, 2015

AGNETE ASTRUP, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

CASPER PHILLIP EBBESEN, 2015

ASSER VADSTRUP, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Agnete Astrup

CASPER PHILLIP EBBESEN, 2015

Asser Vadstrup

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 28 – 29

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

AGNETE ASTRUP, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Adrian Hildrum Agnes Hexla

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

ADRIAN HILDRUM, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

Anna Elisabeth Rosendahl

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

ANNA ELIZABETH ROSENDAHL, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

ADRIAN HILDRUM, 2015

AGNES HEKLA, 2015

ANNA ELIZABETH ROSENDAHL, 2015

ADRIAN HILDRUM, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

AGNES HEKLA, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

ANNA ELIZABETH ROSENDAHL, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Anna Friis Nordtoft

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

ANNA FRIIS NORTOFT, 2015

CARLA LOGO, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

ANNA FRIIS NORTOFT, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

CARLA LOGO, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

DAVID STURE, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

ANNA FRIIS NORTOFT, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

David Sture

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

Carla Logo-Kofoed

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 30 – 31

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

DAVID STURE, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Emil Felix Asger Fromberg The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

EMIL FROMBERG, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Emilie Ørgård Posniak Hansen

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

Frederik Kastrup Østerberg

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

EMILIE ØRGÅRD POSNIAK HANSEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

EMILIE ØRGÅRD POSNIAK HANSEN, 2015

FREDERIK KASTRUP ØSTERBERG, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

EMIL FROMBERG, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

EMILIE ØRGÅRD POSNIAK HANSEN, 2015

FREDERIK KASTRUP ØSTERBERG, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Helene Anker Rasmussen

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

MATHILDE SCHELDE PEDERSEN, 2015

MARIE HOLST LORENZEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

HELENE ANKER RASMUSSEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts,

Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

MATHILDE SCHELDE PEDERSEN, 2015

MARIE HOLST LORENZEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Institute of Architecture and Technology Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

HELENE ANKER RASMUSSEN, 2015

MATHILDE SCHELDE PEDERSEN, 2015

MARIE HOLST LORENZEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Marie Holst Lorenzen

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

HELENE ANKER RASMUSSEN, 2015

Mathilde Schelde Pedersen

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 32 – 33

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Morten Ryborg Larsen The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

Nicolai Duckert Perrild

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

MORTEN RYBORG LARSEN, 2015

Peder Lodding

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

NICOLAI DUCKERT PERRILD, 2015

PEDER LODDING, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

MORTEN RYBORG LARSEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

NICOLAI DUCKERT PERRILD, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

MORTEN RYBORG LARSEN, 2015

NICOLAI DUCKERT PERRILD, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

PEDER LODDING, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

PEDER LODDING, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Sixten Juel Ditlefsen

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

SØREN ASBJØRN BANG, 2015

NANNA DYRBJERG, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

SIXTEN JUEL DITLEFSEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

SIXTEN JUEL DITLEFSEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

SØREN ASBJØRN BANG, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

NANNA DYRBJERG, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

SØREN ASBJØRN BANG, 2015

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

NANNA DYRBJERG, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Nanna Dyrbjerg

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

SIXTEN JUEL DITLEFSEN, 2015

Søren Bang

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 34 – 35

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Tanya Gudmensted The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

TANYA GEDMESTAD, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Morten Hedegaard Kristensen Anine Kildal Haneseth

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

MORTEN HEDEGAARD KRISTENSEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

MORTEN HEDEGAARD KRISTENSEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

MORTEN HEDEGAARD KRISTENSEN, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

ANINE KILDAL HANESETH, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

ANINE KILDAL HANESETH, 2015

Architecture’s Anatomy and Fabrication Institute of Architecture and Technology

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 36 – 37

III

Semeste

er Projects

4 th Semester Assignment ‘Æstetik - Beboelse i Byen’ The assignment of the spring semester is concerned with the development of a multi-story residential building in the dense city. The dwellings are situated in four selected locations in Copenhagen and Frederiksberg. These are: 1) Saxogade, Vesterbro; 2) Enghavevej Vesterbro; 3) Vesterfælledvej, Carlsberg; 4) Platanvej, Frederiksberg.

“A city is a human settlement in which strangers are likely to meet”

’Fall of public man’ – Richard Sennett, sociologist

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 40 – 41

What does it mean to ‘inhabit’? How does the dwelling affect our way of living - and vice versa, how does our way of living make an impact on the dwelling? What is a ‘home’? The intention is about giving something back to the city. The primary characteristics of cities are - and always have been - changes. Cities are organic and evolve through changes in economic, technological and social conditions. A city’s strength is in its inherent diversity, which gives people the opportunity to meet, regardless of interest, age or social and ethnic affiliations. The city is a meeting place. Urban space is not only a practical or eventful room, but is also a normative space where encounters with strangers encourage us to be tolerant citizens of society. This raises a number of questions concerning the borders of ‘dwelling’ and its relationship to the city. Does the property extend beyond its limited footprint? How can the property be involved in the the city across several levels, by exceeding the registered plot? In other words, how can housing give something back to the city and the neighbourhood? Does the building

include public programs in addition to housing? There are special requirements for the study of density and daylight conditions within housing projects, including rewriting the district plan for the area as well as exploring daylight simulations. The semester is divided into a number of distinct phases of the project, with a special focus on the ‘transport’ of ideas, surveys, studies, experiments, results and programs, transitioning towards ‘discovery’ and synthesis between these individual phases.

‘Housing’ is the overall programmatic framework of the semester, and each student develops an architectural program simultaneously exploring spatial intervals and tectonic relations at different scales. Concepts such as the complexity of the ordinary, the ugly and the beautiful, the familiar and the unknown, the public and the private, accessibility, density and daylight, skeleton, body and cladding are explored. Building anatomy such as deck, wall, facade, montage, installations also play a role.

Phase 1: Case study of a dwelling in the city. Students draw their own home, with a focus on the transitional zones between the residence and the city, such as the exterior entry door and the window inside their home.

Phase 3: Daylight Course. Daylight Visualizer. Study trip to Belgium.

Phase 2: Program development of ‘The House in the City / The City in the House’. Students identify and name their own interests. Urban studies and surveys compare densities and daylight conditions. Testing of volume models at a scale of 1:500. Rewriting the district plan.

Phase 4: Development of ‘Housing’ project. Submission requirements are defined individually in relation to the specific focus of each project, themes and personal interests. Drawings of at least one dwelling in a scale of 1:50 are required as well as the core drawings of the entire block at a scale of 1:200.

Enghavevej Students

Agnete Winsnes Astrup Helene Anker Rasmussen Ida Overgaard Carnera Line Falborg Sejr Marie Holst Lorenzen Mathilde Lo Nielsen Nele Lehmann Christiansen Rikke Stålem Sandbugt Signe Bay Bøgh Larsen Søren Bang Tone Ida Vecht Viktor Rolf Olesen

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 42 – 43

Procesmodeller

Agnete Winsnes Astrup

Helene Anker Rasmussen

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 44 – 45

Marie Holst Lorenzen Line Falborg Sejr

Mathilde Lo Nielsen

Vertical Housing The â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Vertical Housingâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; project on Enghavevej in Copenhagen, explores the reprogramming of a closed and divided housing block, which is transformed through the addition of bike paths and pedestrian connections to an open public park. On the other hand, the project searches for the potential of vertical housing to maximise the spatial qualities of small living spaces. The housing program similarly deals with how level changes can create open and closed spaces without the use of walls. The intention of the project is to create a hierarchy of public, semi-public and private spaces in the form of parks and buildings in an aim to give new life to the area.

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 46 – 47

Nele Lehmann Christiansen

The City, the House and the Garden The City-Garden as a Facilitator for a Community in the CityThe purpose of this project is to create an arena for a space-specific community of city dwellers. The idea is to create a room where busy individuals living in the city can establish face-to-face relationships. The proposed program for a shared vegetable garden facilitates this space-specific community. Through the cultivation of vegetables and the addition of the garden as a parallel part of the housing project, the relationships between residents are derived through a shared and common activity. This established an aim to develop a more in depth connection than the brief meeting of two strangers in a hallway. One can speculate that the relationship between residents will be of a more permanent nature as well. The housing project is located inside a block at Enghavevej in Vesterbro. It consists of 19 apartments and can house about 57 residents.

The Gardens Every apartment shares two gardens with a limited number of other apartments. This means that every apartment has two different ‘garden communities’. The project assumes that the residents of the housing project will frequently use a garden shared with a few other people. By creating smaller ‘garden communities’, the residents will have a better chance of getting to know each other. Alongside the opportunity to share an activity with your neighbours, the farming of vegetables holds economic, environmental and health benefits for all residents involved.

The Apartments The communal gardens are spatially solved through inclusion of all the apartments on two levels. This means that every apartment consists of two different ‘garden communities’ – one on each floor. The size of the apartments varies from two room apartments to five room apartments, allowing the complex to house people with different spatial needs – elderly people, young people, families, singles, couples and so on. These people can benefit from each other as they supposedly have different skills. For instance, the elderly residents may have more time to water the plants on a regularly basis, whilst the younger residents can engage with the physically hard work of maintaining the gardens.

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 48 – 49

Rikke Stålem Sandbugt

Signe Bay Bøgh Larsen

Opstalt 1:50

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 50 – 51

Opstalt 1:50

Plan diskussion 1:50

Tværsnit 1:50

Perspektiv af fordelingsrummet

Tværsnit 1:50

Perspektiv af fordelingsrummet

Plan diskussion 1:50

Tværsnit 1:50

Viktor Rolf Olesen

Tone Ida Vecht

Programming How does the notion of exposure relate to developing different perspectives of the city, the neighbour and the home? Is it possible to interpret exposure as something else? Can you, as a private person, open your home and expose your way of living to a stranger? The housing complex introduces a spare bedroom shared between two apartments. The project targets people who are willing to rent out a part of their apartment for an extended period. The place for the bed becomes an expansion of the housing complex when it is not being rented.

Reflection In my own apartment, I enjoy the fact that I am part of the city and can experience the fullness of city life with the people who inhabit it. I am able to do this from the privacy of my own home, where the city cannot see me and neither can the people. I spend a lot of time in this part of the apartment and from here I can decide whether I want to participate in the street life from above or to physically join it on the streets below From my apartment, I am also able to follow the lives of my neighbours without them being able to see me. Therefore, it is not just the street life that I follow, but also the private lives of others. At the other end of my apartment, it is even easier to look into the homes of my neighbours and they can also look straight into my home. I feel very exposed at this end of my home so I do not spend much time here, unless the curtains are down.

We participate in the private lives of others, but to what extent do you allow others to do the same to you? What is allowed when you live in a dense area? How do you shield yourself? How do you relate to your neighbours and the city â&#x20AC;&#x201C; the people that you share your house and the area with?

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 52 – 53

Platanvej Students

Emilie Posniak Hansen Katrine Støa Kim Anouti Pörösei Maja Rosenkvist Hansen Martine Grotenborg Pernille Hornung Bahn Simen Sorthe Yngvild Wormdal Lund Anna Friis Nordtoft Nicolai Duckert Perrild Julia Strömland

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 54 – 55

Emilie Posniak Larsen

Katrine StĂ¸a

Kim Anouti Pörösei

Maja Rosenkvist Hansen

Martine Grotenborg

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 56 – 57

plan_1:50

FREDERIKSBERG ALLÃ&#x2030;

Pernille Hornung Bahn

P L ATA N V E J

O P S TA LT 1 : 5 0 0

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 58 – 59

Lejlighedstyper

Simen Sorthe

Type_ A

Type_ B

Type_ C

78 kvm

52 kvm

56 kvm

Anna Friis Nordtoft

Yngvild Wormdal Lund

The Wall in the City, the House in the Wall The project is located on Platanvej, Frederiksberg, in an area where the borders between public and private are confusing and blurry. The building defines its surrounding urban space by acting as a wall between the street and courtyard, giving them separate identities and more distinct borders. The wall makes these spaces easier to understand and thereby, more inviting to the inhabitants of the city. The building is 50 meters long, 28 meters tall and only 3,5 meters wide. The building consists of ten tall and narrow apartments that unfold vertically. The building as a whole is a positive shape with negative spaces created around it. Similarly, the outer walls of the bedrooms define the more â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;publicâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; zone in each apartment. This zone expands over all four floors and is in fact, one single room, creating a connection with the other rooms.

Because of the buildingâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s narrowness, the urban context around the house becomes a crucial part of the space within. To live in the house is to exist in the intersection between two worlds - the extrovert (the street) and the introvert (the courtyard).

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 60 – 61

Saxogade Students

Morten Ryborg-Larsen Frederik Ă&#x2DC;sterberg Mathilde Schelde Frederik Rolighed Christensen Markus Larsen Anna Elizabeth Rosendahl Carla Logo-Koefoed Caroline CrĂźger Ahm Julie Hvid Petersen

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 62 – 63

PROGRAM

KONSTRUKTION

OPSTALT B-B, FACADE MOD SYD

1:200

FACADE

FORDYBNING

LÃ&#x2020;SEZONE

VASKERI OPBEVARING

1. ETAGE

Morten Ryborg Larsen

STUEPLAN 2. ETAGE

1. ETAGE 3. ETAGE 5M

10 M 1:200

2. ETAGE 4. ETAGE / TAGTERRASSE

3. ETAGE

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 64 – 65

Frederik Østerberg

Mathilde Schelde

Frederik Rolighed

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 66 – 67

Caroline Crüger Ahm Anna Elizabeth Rosendahl

Volumestudier_ Volumestudier_ Volumestudier_ Volumestudier_

Volumestudier_ Volumestudier_ Volumestudier_ Volumestudier_ Volumestudier_ Volumestudier_

Carla Logo-Koefoed

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 68 – 69

Julie Hvid Petersen

Vesterfælledvej Students

Agnes Josefin Hekla Anine Kildal Haneseth Casper Phillip Ebbesen Christian Minor Nørbjerg Christine Arctander Emil Fromberg Karolina Werling Mikkel Lux Larsen Morten Hedegaard Christensen Tanya Gudmestad Thorbjørn Petersen

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 70 – 71

Anine Kildal Haneseth

This project challenges existing norms found within homes for the elderly. We are facing a new generation of seniors, caused by an aging population. My idea is to create a building that grows old with you, which will face the same problems and needs as your body as you grow older. When you begin to inhabit this building in your 50s, you will not need to move or be hospitalised when injured. The two main criteria for designing for seniors, presented after conducting research, are safety and activity. Therefore, the building consists of 16 apartments, which are fully equipped with kitchen, living room and bathroom. Moreover, there is a lot of common spaces found both indoors and outdoors between buildings, all facing the common yard. Within the design, it is important to maintain the feeling of independence but also to create a platform to get to know your neighbours and participate in activities. These spaces are able to transform into apartments for nurses, when help on a daily basis is required.

Knowing your neighbour is a central criteria of the project. Therefore, an open space is installed both between the apartments and between the building blocks to create a yard inside the bigger building. This invites light inside to your neighbourâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s apartment and promotes safety through awareness of when they are at home. The ground floor and first floor contain a rehabilitation center with a pool and areas for exercise. When injured, you can work your way to health while at home or maintain active on a daily basis. The two first floors of the other buildings house a kindergarten. Young and old people will have a platform to meet. The area around the buildings are transformed into an outdoor space, inviting the surrounding buildings to take part and create activity around the building complex.

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 72 – 73

1:50 modellbilder

SNITT 1:200

SNITT 1:50

Agnes Josefin Hekla

Karolina Werling

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 74 – 75

Thorbjørn Petersen

Casper Philip Ebbesen

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 76 – 7 7

I� I

Christian Minor NĂ¸rbjerg

The program explores the possibilities for integrating asylum seekers with local communitiess. The strategy aims to infiltrate existing composition of residents, as a means to prevent gentrification and maintain a social and ethnic diversity. The program unites housing, education and socioeconomic businesses to create more meaningful surroundings for refugees whilst giving something back to the local area. The building consists of housing units ranging from 35m2 to 59m2, with balconies facing a public courtyard. The courtyard functions as a passage and serves both residents and customers of businesses on the ground floor. The building is economic in its use of space on site, contributing to the cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s density. The common areas are a focus point in the proposal, celebrating the everyday routines of an average resident as well as exploring the poetic architectural moments that can appear within a building complex, leading to different extents of interaction between the residents.

BOLIGEN

1:50 OPSTALT MOD GÅRDEN

1:75 MOD GADEN

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 78 – 79

OPSTALT

/. 1

/. 2

/. 3

/. 4

/. 5

/. 6 /. KONCEPT TEGNING

/. SNITT

Christine Arctander

ALTAN BAD

OPHOLD

KØKKEN

PULTERRUM ANKOMST

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 80 – 81

1-VÆRELSES LEJLIGHED 50 M2 1:50

PULTERRUM

ANKOMST

OPHOLD KØKKEN BAD

VÆRELSE

ALTAN

2-VÆRELSES LEJLIGHED 70 M2 1:50

ALTAN

BAD OPHOLD

ANKOMST PULTERRUM

VÆRELSE

KØKKEN

VÆRELSE ALTAN 3-VÆRELSES LEJLIGHED 110 M2 1:50

Mikkel Lux Larsen

Morten Hedegaard

Emil Felix Asger Fromberg

The aim of this public housing project in Vesterbro is to create a cheap housing type with a strong sense of community. The building consists of three houses, each containing between eight and ten apartments. The house allows diversity and flexibility with varying apartment sizes and dividable apartments. The apartments are small but all independently functional. The reduction of square meters in the individual apartment gives space to a shared living area, where neighbourly communities are able to grow. These spaces are connected to the staircases and the communal garden. Creating a feeling of ownership and responsibility as a main focus for the project. Herman Hertzberger’s concepts of territorial zones and ‘in-betweens’ have been an important source of inspiration. The front facade appears closed in its relation to the busy street. It relates to the neighbouring buildings through height and window rhythms. In contrast, the back facade relates to the communal garden and is open and adjustable.

FÆLLESLO

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 82 – 83

1:50 SNIT

Tanya Gudmestad

The aim of this project is to create a safe and social environment for people with a mild form of mental disability. This is a place where people can live a somewhat normal and independent life with access to help and guidance required at any time. For some people, everyday routines are difficult. This project creates a place that provides that help. The building contains small apartments with only the space one would need. The apartments contain a bathroom, space for a bed and a small table. All the apartments are almost the same, with only a small change in size, oriented to face various directions. The inhabitants share a big kitchen, dining areas, living rooms, lounges, activity rooms, small gardens, and a big workshop with space for creative activities. In the workshop, there is space for inhabitants to exhibit what they make and sell to people that walk by. With a concentration of common rooms and smaller private rooms, the inhabitants have the

opportunity to live a highly social life with one another. Every floor is slightly different and the common spaces occur in different places in different sizes. The ground floor is divided by passages, where the passerby can move through the building without actually entering. The rooms on the ground floor are common spaces, and as you move higher up, there are more apartments and common rooms. Visual contact between different levels creates interaction between floors. The front door of the individual rooms are pulled back to create a space for storage of outerwear and making a nontraditional way to enter a private space.

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 84 – 85

5 Days i

n Belgium

5 Days in Belgium Jan de Vylder gives a lecture on day 5 at the ballet studio.

Program day 01 monday 04.05.15

day 02 tuesday 05.05.15

day 03 wednesday 06.05.15

day 04 thursday 07.05.15

day 05 friday 07.05.15

day 06 saturday 09.05.15

museum insel hombroich (de) arrival maastricht (nl)

abdij sint benedictusberg lâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;abbaye de villers wivina senior housing arrival ghent

belgian housing de singel exhibition + lecture by Christoph Grafe areal architekten puls architekten

visiting robbrecht en daem architekten

jan de vylder

departure ghent Zollverein

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 88 – 89

the exiting loadbearing columns Ai Weiwei – go home M1 and build a house for your self 100 houses 20x20m plot Please make models! Skip the opportunity of intensions! Sejima 1:7 models x 10 The craftsmanship behind Chinese masonry Biennale model with columns on a mirror

Lecture by Jan de Vylder

8th of May 2015 Ghent, Production studios for Les Ballets C de la B & LOD 15-25 at the office 560 + 200 slides! ‘We build – we do not design!’ Every project is shown from the backside first 1. Antwerp Mirrors are cladding the neighbor house’ fire gable To heal with paint 2. House W - Antwerp Roof terrace Conversion – refurnish ‘Very small budget covering only half of the costs for making a whole house, so we made half a house!’ ‘Enrich simple materials’ ‘Make understandable fabrics’ ‘Sustainability is just part of architecture’ ‘To blur is interesting’

Notes by Nini Leimand

‘Inconsequence is …’ ‘Pink kitchen’ ‘A composition of the column, the drain, the control cabinet’ ‘Reinforce the floor construction, because of a tree put on the roof terrace – strap down…’ 3. Ghent ‘Photographer Phillip de Jardin – important inspiration’ A . Drawing Zijgevel RotEllen-Berg House, Oudenaarde Cycling ‘Sebastian Skovsted worked on this project’ 5000 Euro ’A glassed house – only one wall is toughing’ ‘Inspired by the church made of blue stones’ B. To catalog Identity-drawing C. Portugal – Drawing Sizas Campus – a one week

workshop Context of mind To mask a drawing ‘I am happy to make students crazy again!’ Sol leWitt – a wall painting in a gallery Electrical wires are cutting through the painting The students should make bus stops inspired by masked photos of dvvts work ‘Obsessed of what the drawing can do’ 1. Tugendhat – balustrades in chrome. Angry with the restauration because all traces from the Russians and Germans has been erased 2. Bicycles - Two pictures in cloudy weather >< sunshine 3. A gallery – dvvt inserted 4 non loadbearing columns made by plywood and painted white to blend in with

M2 The Belgian pavilion build in Antwerp in a 1:2 model as a backdrop M3 A cupboard – ‘Day and night’ A furniture that worked acoustically Deconstruction of a banal acoustic wall build in steel profiles and gypsum boards MIL ANO ruined the customer’s idea A Play tennis in a Siza monument and film it B The ballet Cement tiles – annoying! Waiting walls. A blind wall A mute wall A whispering wall ‘Never solve difficulties – just change them’! Either a painting or a window The Sas van Houdevar window – named after a politician Group exhibition. A checkerboard painted corner Wivina ‘Make observations – don’t analyze’! IGLO 1960th high slabs

The building do not show the loadbearing structure but the room divisions The accompanying text is extremely important Divides in themes An admiration for Pletznik Ai Weiweis atelier was torn down – dvvt photoshoped his house in to a Belgian site in Ghent. The major said ‘no’ In China a project must be redrawn by Chinese architects to be build L AST IDEA just after the school! A villa in Brussel. The existing house was too small and the height of the ceiling was too low. We suggested to dick half a story down but the client laughed! And we lost the job. 200 slides PASSIVHOUSE Chaotic windows become yet another monoculture! THE ASSIGNMENT – kavel houses Ghent Urban Development Cooperation (AG SOB) Small scale housing following unconventional principals They offer the site to a suitable family as a package complete with a selected architect A pool of 30 architects A very meagre budget The other architect pulled the green card = sustainability 1 House T 1+4 Number 1 has never been build The daylight entering over the concrete beam A green car and a green handrail at the roof terrace -

2 House W The client didn’t have the money for a whole house – so we made half a house! 9000euro all included Steel patio 3 House Abbed Concrete block The perpendicular wall shows as half blocks in the façade How can construction make the atmosphere of the house? CC measure between the beams – a fault that is celebrated 4 House Høvestete Six house houses was torn only to build four! Real people – not the youngsters The white doors are not alone The neighbors have them too 5 House Verbrande Brug Refurbishment of a garage

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 90 – 91

Wivina Senior Housing by dvvt

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 92 – 93

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 94 – 95

6 Simple

e Houses

Kavel Houses by DVVT Architecten The ambitions of AG SOB (Ghent Urban Development Corporation) strive further than towards development of new urban districts and redrawing the existing urban fabric in broad gestures. Their Kavel project is an exercise in the precise implementation of small-scale housing projects following unconventional principles. The corporation seeks opportunities within the urban fabric, through demolition if necessary, to build new homes either individually or in groups ranging from two to three to seven or eight inhabitants. The corporation does not manage everything themselves. Instead, they offer the site to a young individual or suitable family selected from a number of candidates, together as a package complete with a selected architect on highly advantageous terms. The deal is also bound by stringent conditions for financial and program requirements, where a high grade of sustainability is required on a practically impossible budget. Much remains to be said about the meagre budget, the arbitrary selection process and the exemplary role of the projects â&#x20AC;&#x201C; as real

examples or only as exceptional examples. But it is the boldness that matters. Having the courage to approach property development in a new way is probably the only way to help property development out of its (real or alleged) predicament. Four plots, or to be precise, four families declare themselves. Four houses are drawn. At first sight they seem like four identical houses, but none of them is exactly the same. Not only are the plots different but the families too. Actually, they may really be four different situations. Like any other assignment, they have nothing to do with one another. Or maybe they do. One thing these houses have in common is that they were designed in section rather than in the plan. This is certainly the approach taken to each of these houses, as it was for many preliminary studies. It was not only the families that had to put in an application for these projects, the architects did so too. The candidate architects first received an imaginary project to design. The exercise conformed to real parameters of developing on inner city

sites - narrow but deep, and of course, with multiple floors. Designing in section is actually a consequence of this type of site. The activity of dwelling is always organised vertically, from daytime domesticity to sleeping. This poses a main problem of how to bring daylight down to the lower floors. Another aspect that the houses share is in the attempt to deal with demands of the situation, not just with the narrow, deep plan. Two of the four houses were faced with additional irregularities. In one case, the walls of the adjacent properties force the plot to taper almost to a point; in the other, the plot is so irregular that the house, gains what could be described as a third facade. The four houses have a special economy, always assuming the possibility of influencing the eventual detailing as early as the initial shell design. A single house cannot do that. The way the houses relate to the city. What living in the city is like. What living is like. That is what it is about. Not one of the four proposals ignore this.

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 98 – 99

House Tichel 1 Building a house in the context of a specific assignment initiated by AG SOB Gent, titled Kavel Project

Assignment Building a house in the context of a specific assignment initiated by AG SOB Gent, titled Kavel Project it is a set of two plots, in which one plot is assigned to architecten de vylder vinck taillieu Client Private Year 2010 Location Gent mÂ˛ 166 â&#x201A;Ź Private Status Study House Tichel 1 is the other part of the ensemble wih House Tichel 4, left side. Study - 2010

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 100 – 101

Back facade

Section

Front facade

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 102 – 103

Third floor Second floor First floor Ground floor

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 104 – 105

Existing situation

House Tichel 4 Assignment Building a house, in the context of a specific assignment initiated by AG SOB Gent, titled Kavel Project it is a set of two plots, in which one plot is assigned to architecten de vylder vinck taillieu Client Private Year 2010-2013 Location Gent mÂ˛ 166 â&#x201A;Ź Private Status Built House Tichel is one of four houses in a Kavel ensemble ,which deals with a bizarre tapering site due to the adjacent party walls, reaching a point at the bottom of the garden. House Tichel is at the right-hand side of the ensemble (the house on the left side was also a prospect, but this changed later). A rear wall which retreats on each successive storey and a roof disconnected from the party wall of the house on the right may form.

Photo: Filip Dujardin

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 106 – 107

Study

Photo: Filip Dujardin

model

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 108 – 109

Photo: Filip Dujardin

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 110 – 111

Photo: Filip Dujardin

House Arbed Alternating the practically constant colour intonation of concrete blocks with wooden beams and floors, and white walls

Assignment Building a house, in the context of a specific assignment initiated by AG SOB Gent, titled Kavel Project it is a set of two plots , in which one plot is assigned to architecten de vylder vinck taillieu Client Private Year 2010-2012 Location Gent mÂ˛ 229 â&#x201A;Ź Private Status Built House Arbed alternates the practically constant colour intonation of concrete blocks with wooden beams and floors, and white walls. The pure play of light is paramount here. Concrete blocks absorb. The walls reflect. The wooden beams add just enough colour.

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 112 – 113

Study model

Study

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 114 – 115

Photos: Filip Dujardin

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 116 – 117

House Warande Yet another house. Different people. Different ideas.

Assignment Building a house, in the context of a specific assignment initiated by AG SOB Gent, titled Kavel Project. it is a set of two plots of which one plot is assigned to architecten de vylder vinck taillieu Client private Year 2011-2013 Location Gent mÂ˛ 120 â&#x201A;Ź Private Status built Yet another house. Different people. Different ideas. But those rooms again every time. And the stairs too. Stairs and rooms. Rooms beside stairs. Just stairs and rooms.

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 118 – 119

Photo: Filip Dujardin

model

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 120 – 121

Photo: Filip Dujardin

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 122 – 123

House Meulestede The first in a series of houses which were an exercise in the materiality of the shell Assignment Building a house, in the context of a specific assignment initiated by AG SOB Gent, titled Kavel Project. it is a set of two plots, in which one plot is assigned to architecten de vylder vinck taillieu Client Private Year 2009-2011 Location Gent mÂ˛ 170 â&#x201A;Ź Private Status Built

House Meulestede was the first in a series of houses which were an exercise in the materiality of the shell;* in how everything could fit together. Every brick bond was drawn. But when something did not fit exactly, an unexpected choice might be made; something that did not fit was not forced to fit. A beam to be positioned on a spread support on a wall that follows a stepped line, positions itself as it is: everything is slightly shifted. The slight shift is what makes it visually interesting. This inspires the decision, in another situation, to allow wooden beams to simply lie on a transverse concrete beam and admit sunlight between them.

Photo: Filip Dujardin

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 124 – 125

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 126 – 127

Photo: Filip Dujardin

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 128 – 129

Photo: Filip Dujardin

De Verbrande Brug The project is called ‘De Verbrande Brug’ and is located next to the canal Brusselschelde.The client bought a garage and asked us to transform it into a house. We proposed to keep the structure but to give a new roof, to build in between and on top. The living area is moved to the first floor and is designed with a long window that looks on to the wide canal. The sleeping area remains downstairs, enclosed in between the existing walls. New walls are moved backward to let in more light. A second staircase is introduced. One to enter, one to sleep. They separate day and night and create spatial interplay. Assignment Reconversion of a garage box into a single family house. Client Private Year 2013-2016 Location Humbeek m² 120 € Private Status In Process

A project called ‘De Verbrande Brug’. A project next to the canal Brussel-Schelde.

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 130 – 131

New facade front

New facade back

B B

B' B'

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 132 – 133

Existing facade A' A'

New first floor

A A

New section

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 134 – 135

Collage

Tectonic Translati

ons

Tectonic Translations by Sebastian Skovsted

The workshop of â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;The Not Yet Summer Schoolâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; combined both analysis and development of a site-specific house in Copenhagen with a focus on construction, material and detail. 54 students paired up to make 27 models scaled 1:333 (the same scale as the original models of the DVVT houses), in 100 hours based on one of six previously studied houses in Belgium. Through this task, students were encouraged to conduct a thorough analysis of the original precedents in order to understand and translate their observations. How would the new house position itself within a specific site in Copenhagen? What are the consequences of this new condition for the overall layout, construction, materials and details? The three chosen projects exemplify this.

Verbrande Brug, Mynstersvej 14 – Group no. 08

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 138 – 139

The house in Mynstersvej is similar to the house in Brussels, which is built in and on top of an existing garage and squeezed in between two higher neighbouring houses. In Brussels, the living room sits on top of the existing garage and the entire facade is comprised of a large horizontal panoramic window that overlooks the adjacent canal. The house in Frederiksberg is not facing the water, but is oriented to the houses on the other side of the small street. There is however, a great view down the street. The large frontal view towards the canal has thus been translated into a sideorientated vertical view down the street, from floor to ceiling, found in the double height living room. The window is placed to protrude in front of the house next door, as a consequence of the rotation relative to the garage, neighbouring houses and street - like the original house in Brussels. The rest of the facade is kept almost completely closed. As a consequence of the higher neighbouring houses in Copenhagen, an additional floor has been added to the house. More notable is the reversal of the pitched roof, designed so that its highest points are at the facade and its lowest points at the middle of the house. The roof is

inverted to create the high vertical window. In the original house, two I-beams are placed across the living room, in the event that the residents would like to create a mezzanine under the roof. In the house in Copenhagen, this mezzanine is already in use. In Verbrande Brug, the beam carrying the roof cantilever (where the facade withdraws from the street) is supported by a steel column. This is attached to the wall via a round steel plate, distributing the weight to the bricks. This motive in Copenhagen is translated into a steel cable, which carries the cantilever by supporting the three beams carrying the floors and roof. The cable is held by a large semicircle of steel, attached to the roof edge of the neighbouring building.

Tichelrei 4, Istedgade 85 - Group no. 16 Since the plot in Istedgade 85 is much smaller than that of the original house in Ghent, the new house pushes out onto the sidewalk and road. The house follows the precedent of neighbouring houses at street level, but steps out on each floor. In the same way as Tichelrei 4, the rear façade retreats from each successive story. This cantilever becomes one large bay window stretching the entire width of the house. Since the house is so narrow - even at its widest point - the scale is reminiscent of a typical bay window that could have been part of a larger house further down the street. The façade is not like a typical bay window filled

with window openings, but is relatively closed - corresponding to the surrounding buildings and façade of Tichelrei 4 in Ghent. This is also perhaps in response to the fact that the rooms are at risk of being very exposed, since they have been brought further forward, than in the adjacent buildings. In the original house, a thin round green steel column supports the upper crossbeam in the middle. To prevent the house on Istedgade from tumbling onto the street, due to its dramatic overhang in proportion to its modest depth, the green steel column has been translated into a round steel bar fixed into the foundation. Instead of supporting the crossbeam the same way as in Ghent, at the bottom of the floor joists, the bar is fastened to a cross beam running on top of the large beams that support

the whole building’s overhang. This prevents it from being pulled up due to the weight of the cantilever In the original house, the staircase is placed lengthways to divide up the floor plan into sleeping rooms facing the street and large living rooms facing the garden, in the narrow end of the house. The stairs shift a staircase-width every floor, so that the floor plan changes each time - creating a diagonal view down and across the house with all floors visually bound together. The site on Istedgade is not wide enough to have stairs that cross the house. Each floor is so small, even with the bay window, that it has been preserved as one large room without partitions. The stairs are displaced on each floor like in Ghent, but are turned perpendicular to the street.

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 140 – 141

Meulestede, Hallandsgade 17, - Group no. 22 The site in Hallandsgade is considerably narrower than the site of the original house in Ghent. The triangular elements found in the otherwise orthogonal house in Ghent seem to have enacted a diagonal play of facade and beam directions in the new house.

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 142 – 143

The turned facades retain the width of the original facades. The front facade appears to be a rather true copy of the original, but is actually not. The windows are changed slightly, in proportions relating to the interior spaces as well as to new neighbouring houses. The unheated part integrated in the original house under the stairs, here becomes the entire area where the house withdraws from the street. This creates a semi-private outdoor room even on this very tiny plot. The window niches in the walls are turned in the way that they follow the direction of street and not the façade in which they are placed. The window niches within the front façade are orientated towards the semi-private space and the rear façade to direct the viewpoint backwards despite the rotated façade. A very precise game between the right and diagonal angles of the concrete and wooden beams is created in the house at Hallandsgade, making the structure find little spaces in between. The new house is like a compact version of the original house.

Original Copies All six original houses were built from the same typical Belgian typology - a single family house on narrow plot, four to six meters in width, reaching up to three to four floors with side walls shared directly with neighbouring houses and each with its own small backyard. In Copenhagen, this typology is rarely found. By consequence, the sites in Copenhagen were leftover places or gaps in the city as opposed to real plots. In the end, this gave the sites a certain resistance that seems to have strengthened the students’ responses. There are up to five versions of the same Flemish house on the same site in Copenhagen. It is interesting to see how different the responses are, with the same original house as a reference point. There is great variation between the various models but at the same time, they have a distinct commonality. They are simultaneously all copies and completely unique.

Sebastian Skovsted worked for architecten de vylder vinck taillieu during the period 2007 – 2012. He is partner in Johansen Skovsted Arkitekter and teacher at K ADK.

VII

Housing Gaps of

in the the City

Housing in the Gaps of the City The Invention of Impossible Building Sites by Karsten Gori

development, building additions, layers of demolishing, reconstruction, repairs, change in building use, building transformations, ’Fall of public man’ – Richard Sennett, sociologist condemned buildings, etcetera. Would it be possible to see the city as a landscape of transcurrent faults, geological The city appears to be formatted by an underlying grid of invisible structures defined by compressions, density, mass, openings, erosions and excavations, cracks and gaps, cadasters, ownership of land parcels, land-use restrictions, zoning, city planning and real estate ridges, valleys, caves and plains? Perhaps a new (urban) landscape with development. new rules for how to define place and how to This results in an immediate build? understanding of the city as divided into separated building sites, streets, courtyards, back and front, parcels and restrictions. Double Program But what happens if we simply ignore, just for a second, the juridical and economical In 2013 LETH & GORI initiated a new formatting of the city, and instead see the city as exhibition and workshop program in collaboration an immense mass of built landscape? The city with The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, as a geological force and the result of human School of Architecture, titled ‘Double Program’. activities in a new anthropocene time scale? The workshop and exhibition takes its starting point from an open invitation to an international Let’s say we compose a geological (or architect or practice, somewhere in the world, architectural) survey of the city - an excavation whose work stands out with a strong personality of the stratification and layers of real estate and quality.

“A city is a human settlement in which strangers are likely to meet”

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 146 – 147

The idea started a few years before with the initiative to run an architect-in-residency program based in LETH & GORI combined architecture office and storefront exhibition space at Absalonsgade 21 in Copenhagen. In 2012, Dutch architect Anne Holtrop was invited to work on what later became the solo exhibition ‘Batara’, in collaboration with photographer Bas Princen. In 2013, following a double workshop held initially in Barcelona and then Copenhagen, the Spanish based duo Flores Y Prats held a double exhibition, simultaneously presenting one (fantastic) project in the 800m2 exhibition hall of The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts and five smaller (equally fantastic) projects in the 28m2 storefront exhibition space of LETH & GORI.

Housing in the Gaps of the City The exhibition ‘Housing in the Gaps of the City’ presents the work of 56 2nd year architecture students at the Bachelor program, ‘Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication’, as a result of a collaboration between The Royal Danish Academy of Arts School of Architecture, Belgian architecture office Architecten de Vylder Vinck Taillieu (DVVT) and Danish architecture office LETH & GORI. The assignment developed from a specific interest in housing wedged into the gaps and cracks of the city. Through viewing the city as a continuous landscape, it becomes clear that there are places and corners in the city that apparently do not belong to anyone. Spaces and gaps that seem forgotten or simply neglected because they do not represent any apparent financial value. ‘Housing in the Gaps of the City’ is an architectural strategy that moves into the gaps

of the city and develops - in the photographic meaning of the word - housing in places where construction seems impossible. The strategy processes non-existing building sites and empty urban space into actual building sites. The resulting densification of the city offers a wider diversity and variation in building typologies and scale, and consequently the city becomes more open to more opportunity. In other words: The city becomes architecturally richer as the multi-layering of different programs and scales sited side by side creates a city with more depth - a wilder city, where strangers are likely to meet.

The Kavel Project as a New Model for Partnership with the Municipality of Copenhagen Kavel in Dutch or Flemish simply means plot or site. And the four sites from DVVT Kavel Houses in Ghent, House M, House A, House T and House W, are all by first sight quite simple. At a closer look, all turn out to be rather

impossible building sites. Small openings or cuts in the city, narrow and deep in plan and high and irregular in section, demand the utmost precision in the architectural work and in designing the section in order to provide daylight deep into the living spaces of these new houses. All four sites are found next to blank firewalls. Blank canvases waiting for something new. Waiting for a new neighbor. An opaque, quiet waiting wall. In Flemish wachtgevel. Simply waiting. The unconventional Kavel Project was initiated by the independent city development company SOB Ghent, which approaches property development in a totally new way. The corporation seeks building sites within the existing urban fabric - if necessary through demolition - in order to build new affordable small homes. The sites are offered to a family selected through a qualification process, as a package complete with a selected architect. The terms of the deal are highly advantageous but defined by stringent conditions for financial and sustainability requirements. A fantastic possibility but at the same time almost impossible financially. The results of the Kavel Project are unconventional and bold. In the case of four Kavel Houses by DVVT, the results are extremely beautiful and touching in the way the individual

houses care about what living in the city can be like. Even though the four houses all have a certain rawness that seem to come from struggling with a tight budget, this also brings out unexpected qualities from raw materials, exposed concrete blocks, untreated wood and painted steel surfaces and detailing - creating an authentic, robust frame around living in the house. Living can be simple and respectful in the way natural resources are used and processed. That respect is sustainability. That living is now. The Kavel Project opens up a new way of seeing the city and the (hidden) opportunities that lie within the gaps of the city. It also challenges the way we traditionally understand the collaboration between the municipality, the citizens and the role of the architect. Could this be done in Copenhagen? Would it be possible for architects and clients to partner up with the municipality of Copenhagen, in order to locate and develop the seemingly large number of neglected and impossible building sites that are just waiting for something new to happen? We are very inspired by DVVT and the empathetic way the four Kavel Houses in Ghent deal with the poetics of everyday life, and we cannot wait to discover what opportunities are to be found within Copenhagen.

Karsten Gori is an architect and co-owner of LETH & GORI and assistent professor at K ADK. LETH & GORi is a Danish architectural practise run by architects Uffe Leth and Karsten Gori. The office builds innovative projects based on an interest in everyday life â&#x20AC;&#x201C; in places and buildings that are powerful and strong beyond the first glimpse. LETH & GORI works from a combined office and exhibition space in Copenhagen. The storefront space hosts events and exhibitions by architects, artists, designers and curators.

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 148 – 149

Urban landscapes. Gaps and cracks in the city that apparently don’t belong to anyone. Forgotten or simply neglected. Or maybe it’s more correct to say that they belong to the city?

Photo: Karsten Gori

10 Infills in Copenhagen These so called (non) sites are scattered over Copenhagen, Amager, Nordvest, Vesterbro

Istedgade 85

Nordre fasanvej 268

Hallandsgade 20

VĂŚrnedamsvej 4

Architectureâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 150 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; 151

Mynstersvej 14

Sortedams Dossering 59

Ravnsborggade 21

Hallandsgade 17

Hamletsgade 14

Folkarsvej 9

VIII

27 Mod in 1:33

els

27 Models in 1:33 The students chooses one of six projects by de vylder vinck tailleu to study closely before developing their own models The students pair up and develop models of family homes in scale 1:33 1/3

hallandsgade 20 model 01 model 02 model 03 istedgade 85 model 04 model 05 model 06 model 07 nordre fasanvej 268 model 08 model 09 model 10 vĂŚrnedamsvej 4 model 11 model 12 model 13 model 14 model 15 mynstersvej 14 model 16

sortedams dossering 59 model 17 model 18 ravnsborggade 21 model 19 hamletsgade 14 model 20 model 21 hallandsgade 17 model 22 folkvarsvej 4 model 23 model 24 model 25 model 26 model 27

Imagine five simple houses on five humble plots. Inspired by five simple houses

housestichelmeulestedearbedverbrandebrugwarandetichel studioarchitectendevyldervincktaillieu schoolofarchitecturetheroyaldanischacademyoffinearts imagine five simple houses on five humble plots inspired by five simple houses

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 154 – 155

only day one day two day tree day four day five only only

five long days

introduction 11am we:studio you:plot work work work review 16pm models scale one:fifty you with us

architecten de vylder vinck taillieu jo taillieu jan de vylder sebastian skovsted sander Rutgers karsten gori ufe leth

it is a simple exercises but arriving to such beautiful but natural complexity; only by observing simple houses designed by architecten de vylder vinck taillieu in the context of the city of Ghent and one time somewhere else; then imagining those houses somewhere in the city of Copenhagen or somewhere else; and only representing those imagination by a simple model but a model that represents yet immediately the elements of detail and materiality; only five days no more

so on day number one; be prepared: the plots are yet clear and documented by each one of you; all material for model making is on one side of your table; why not yet your first imagination on the other side of the table; the immediate start day one is inevitable but so wanted yet

the not yet summerschool architecten de vylder vinck taillieu

01C 01A

01B

02A

Architectureâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 156 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; 157

02B

01A - 01C Rikke Sand Anna Elizabeth Rosendahl 02A- 02B Anine Kildal Karolina Werling

03A

03B

03D 03C Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 158 – 159

03A - 03D Helene Anker Kure Emil Fromberg

04A

04B

04A - 04B Mikkel Lux Larsen Marie Holst Lorenzen 05 Nicolai Duckert Perrild Sixten Juel Ditlefsen 06 Mathilde Lo Nielsen Christine Archtander

Architectureâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 160 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; 161

07A 07C

07B

07A- 07C Mathilde Lo Nielsen Christine Archtander 08A- 08B Magnus Gundersen Lihn Markus Larsen 09 Julia Strรถmland Jeppe Lorentsen 10 Nele Lehmann Christensen Morten Hedegaard Kristensen

08B 08A

10 Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 162 – 163

11 12

11 Simen Sorthe Søren Bang 12 Yngvild Wormdal Lund Thorbjørn Lønberg Petersen 13 Casper Philip Ebbesen Lovisa Swärd 14A - 14B Tone Ida Vecht Viktor Rolf Olesen 15 Dennis Anderson Julie Hvid Petersen

14A

14B Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 164 – 165

16A

16B

17 18

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 166 – 167

16A - 16B Line Falborg Sejr Katrine Støa 17 Frederik Østerberg Morten Ryborg-Larsen 18 Mathilde Schelde Adrian Hildrum 19 Asser Vadstrup Agnes Hekla

21A

21B 20 Maja Rosenkvist Caroline CrĂźger Ahm 21A - 21B Christian Minor NĂ¸rbjerg Martine Grothenborg 22 Frederik Rolighed Agnete Winsnes Astrup 23A- 23B Jens Aleksander Jensen Peder Lodding 24 Frederik Rolighed Agnete Winsnes Astrup

23A Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 168 – 169

23B

25A - 25D Tanya Gudmestad Signe BÃ¸gh Bay Larsen

25A

25B

25D 25C

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 170 – 171

26A

26A - 26B Ida Carnera Pernille Hornung Bahn 27A- 27B Jonathan Pihl Petersen Emilie Posniak Hansen Nanna Dyrbjerg Larsen

26B

27B Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 172 – 173

27A

Pop-Up LETH &

at GORI

Pop-Up LETH & GORI opens up their exhibition space on Vesterbro for a one-night only, pop-up exhibition featuring a selection of the models. model 01 model 02 model 03 model 04 model 05 vĂŚrnedamsvej 4

model 06 mynstersvej 14

model 07 sortedams dossering 59

model 08 ravnsborggade 21

model 09 model 10 hamletsgade 14

model 11 model 12 model 13 hallandsgade 20

model 14 model 15 model 16 folkvarsvej 4

model 17 model 18 istedgade 85

model 19 model 20 nordre fasanvej 268

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 176 – 17 7

fredag 04.09.2015

leth & gori absalonsgade 21b

kl 17.00 21.00

bolig i byens sprækker

boligdrømme uden byggegrund the not yet summer school / architecten de vylder vinck taillieu

boligudstilling 27 arkitekturmodeller i skala 1:33 1/3 produceret af 2. års studerende ved kunstakademiets arkitektskole under bachelorprogrammet arkitekturens anatomi og fabrikation udstillingen er resultatet af et udvekslingssamarbejde mellem kunstakademiets arkitektskole, den internationalt anerkendte belgiske tegnestue architecten dvvt, ved jan de vylder, inge vinck og jo taillieu og tegnestuen leth & gori i løbet af en 100 timer lang sommerworkshop, udvikledes en række enfamilie-boliger i byens sprækker – eksemplificeret gennem udpegede (ikke-)byggefelter i københavn, på amager, i nordvest og på vesterbro

Det Kongelige Danske Kunstakademis Skoler for Arkitektur, Design og Konservering

architekten de vylder vinck tallieau

RKU

Rektorkollegiet for de Kunstneriske og Kulturelle Uddannelser

Version: 2015-04-22 J.nr.:10/sags nr. RKU/afsender torben.holm@kadk.dk

DAGSORDEN RKU-møde

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 178 – 179

Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 180 – 181

Staff at the BA Program Architecture’s Anatomy & Fabrication / Page 182 – 183

Head of Institute IBT David Garcia

Head of 1st Year Johannes Schotanus

Head of 2nd year Anders Krogdal Nielsen

Head of 3rd Year Ida Emilie Henriksen

Teaching Assistant

Assistant Professor

Head of Program Nini Leimand (responsible)

1st Semester Responsible Sebastian Skovsted

3rd Semester Responsible Mette Jerl Jensen

6 Weeks Course Responsible Jan Søndergaard

Associate Professor, Industrial PhD.

Professor

Jan Søndergaard

2nd Semester Responsible Søren Johansen

4th semester Karsten Gori

5th Semester Responsible Martin Winther

Teaching Assistant

Assistant Professor

Sidse Hald

Helle Degn Vedelsbøl

Teaching Assistant

6th Semester Responsible Niels Jakubiak Andersen

Kalle Jørgensen

Kristian Nielsen Kjær

Teaching Assistant

Professor

Institute Coordinator Birgitte Weien

Teaching Assistant

Assistant Professor, Industrial PhD.

Ida Richter Brændstrup

Nini Leimand

Teaching Assistant

Associate Professor, Industrial PhD.

Teaching Assistant

Assistant Professor

Marianne Ingvartsen

Associate Professor

Johnny Svendborg

Associate Professor

Sara Wille-Jørgensen

Assistant Professor

Poul Høilund de Cruise

Assistant Professor

Daniel Baumann

Assistant Professor

Morten Vedelsbøl

Teaching Assistant

Credits

Editor Nini Leimand

Sponsors RKU Rektorkollegiet for de Kunstneriske og Kulturelle Uddannelser

Text Nini Leimand Karsten Gori Sebastian Skovsted Anders Krogdal Nielsen Design NR2154 Layout NR2154 Proofreading Grace Chen Alexandra Holman Print Clausen Grafisk

Thank you Jan de Vylder Inge Vinck Jo Taillieu Max Kesteloos Sander Rutger LETH & GORI Karsten Gori, Sebastian Skovsted Anders Krogdal Nielsen Pernille Scheuer Johannes Schotanus Jens Frederiksen Mette Jerl Jensen Marianne Ingvartsen Poul Høilund de Cruise Daniel Baumann Morten Vedelsbøl Birgitte Weien

Copies 500

Paper Munken Lynx 150g Gallerie Art Silk 300g

Published by The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation

Isbn 978-87-7830-379-0 Cover illustrations Signe Bay Larsen (front) Christine Arctander (back)

Institute of Architecture and Technology IBT Philip de Langes Allé 10 DK-1435 Copenhagen K Denmark +45 41701515

ISBN 978-87-7830-379-0

ISBN 978-87-7830-37 9-0

The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation Institute of Architecture and Technology

9 788778 303790 >

Architectureâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Anatomy and Fabrication (AAF) is a three year Bachelor program taught at The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, School of Architecture. In order to fabricate architecture that promotes the best living conditions, one must constantly study, dissect, reconstruct and improve its many components and forms of expression â&#x20AC;&#x201C; its anatomy. It is through creation and the act of making that allows techniques to open up architectural work for new discoveries. This book seeks to unfold the explorations of 2nd year students during the 4th semester of the program in 2015.