Good Governance , Concept & Context

Page 120

Democracy and Participation

95

national security, and negative, because it can lead to secrecy, corruption, and even a military dictatorship. While a liberal democracy can be a plutocracy, where decisions are taken behind closed doors and the people have almost no opportunity to influence the politics between elections, a participative democracy is more closely connected to the will of the people. Participative democracy, built on transparency and everyday participation, has been practised officially in Northern Europe for decades. For example, Sweden allowed public access to governmental documents from 1766, when Sweden passed its Freedom of the Press Act.8 It has been adopted as an ideal to strive for by the other European Union states. Many countries in the world still have older forms of democracy, or other forms of government.

4. Democracy and Participation Participation refers to different mechanisms for the public to express opinions—​ and ideally exert influence—​ regarding different types of governmental activities. Participatory decision-​making can take place along any realm of human social activity like participative democracy. There is also a strong development in deliberative democracy which is directly related to participation.9 For well-​informed participation to occur, it is argued that some version of transparency is necessary, but not sufficient. It has also been argued that those most affected by a decision should have the greatest say, while those least affected would have the least say. Participation has different objectives. Participatory activities may stem from an administrative area or a citizen’s perspective. From the administrative viewpoint, participation can build public support for activities. It can educate the public about an agency’s activities. It can also facilitate useful information exchange regarding local conditions. Furthermore, participation is often legally mandated. From the citizen’s viewpoint, participation enables individuals and groups to influence agency decisions in a representational manner. Participation can be classified in different ways. Sherry Arnstein discusses various types of participation.10 These are broadly categorized as non-​participation, tokenism, and citizen power. She defines citizen participation as the redistribution of power that enables the have-​not citizens, presently excluded from the political and economic processes, to be deliberately included in the future. Archon Fung presents another classification of participation based on three key questions: Who is allowed to participate, and are they representative of the population? What is the method of communication or decision-​making? And how much influence or authority is granted to the participation? Other ‘ladders’ of participation have been presented by Connor,11 Wiedemann and Femers,12 and Rocha.13 Participation can refer to participation as part of decision-​making, a notion in legal theory. But participation can also mean ownership and, in that case, it means having something in common with others. Participation in the context of finance means getting some benefit from the performance of a certain underlying asset. Finally, we see more and more e-​participation and that refers to participation in e-​government, and is related to the involvement of the citizen in the democratic process.

8 12

9 10 Banisar 2004. Akerboom 2018. Arnstein 1969. 13 Wiedemann and Femers 1993. Rocha 1997.

11

Connor 1988.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Index

44min
pages 332-353

Bibliography

38min
pages 306-331

Governance

14min
pages 301-305

2. Part II: The Specification of the Principles of Good Governance

8min
pages 298-300

4. Conclusions

9min
pages 291-294

of Human Rights

2min
page 290

2. Good Governance in International Case Law

2min
page 289

Ombudsman

17min
pages 280-285

4. Conclusions

3min
pages 286-287

Court of Justice

30min
pages 270-279

Institutions

2min
page 269

16. Implementation of Good Governance Principles on the European Level

2min
page 268

5. Conclusions

2min
pages 266-267

South Africa

13min
pages 261-265

3. Implementation of the Good Governance Principles in Canada

21min
pages 253-260

7. Conclusions

12min
pages 220-224

2. Implementation of Good Governance in Northern Europe

2min
page 226

6. Cases about the Implementation of Good Governance Principles

5min
pages 218-219

5. Different Developments in the Practices of Different Countries

2min
page 217

2. Concept and Principles of Good Governance and Integrity

2min
page 212

Practices of Good Governance

6min
pages 214-216

the Non-EU Country Studies

1min
page 213

1. Good Governance: The Need and the Practical Relevance

2min
page 211

6. Conclusions

1min
pages 207-209

5. Sources of the Principle of Human Rights

14min
pages 201-206

3. Specification of the Concept

2min
page 198

2. The Concept of the Principle of Human Rights

2min
page 197

4. Institutions Involved

4min
pages 199-200

6. Conclusions

1min
page 195

5. Sources of the Principle of Accountability

5min
pages 193-194

2. The Concept of Accountability

5min
pages 183-184

6. Sources of the Principle of Effectiveness

5min
pages 179-180

7. Conclusions

1min
page 181

5. Institutions Involved

10min
pages 175-178

4. Specification of this Concept

2min
page 174

3. The Concept of Effectiveness

12min
pages 170-173

6. Conclusions

3min
pages 164-165

2. Development of the Principle of Effectiveness

5min
pages 168-169

3. Specification of the Concept

10min
pages 157-160

5. Sources of the Principle of Participation

5min
pages 162-163

4. Institutions Involved

2min
page 161

1. The Development of the Principle of Participation

2min
page 155

9. The Principle of Participation

2min
page 154

2. The Concept of Participation

2min
page 156

6. Conclusions

2min
pages 152-153

5. Sources of the Principle of Transparency

20min
pages 145-151

4. Institutions Involved

8min
pages 142-144

3. Specification of the Concept

7min
pages 139-141

2. The Concept of Transparency

5min
pages 137-138

2. The Concept of Properness

2min
page 125

5. Conclusions

1min
pages 121-123

3. Specification of the Concept

21min
pages 126-133

3. Democracy and Transparency

2min
page 119

4. Democracy and Participation

2min
page 120

2. Democracy: Direct and Representative

2min
page 118

6. The Role of Good Governance Related to these Developments

2min
page 114

7. Conclusions

1min
page 115

3. Rule of Law and Rechtsstaat: Specification of Differences

5min
pages 106-107

5. Difficulties and Developments of the Traditional Rule of Law

5min
pages 112-113

4. Rule of Law and Rechtsstaat: Formal and Substantial Perspectives

11min
pages 108-111

2. Different Historical Roots and Traditional Perspectives

2min
page 105

7. Conclusions

3min
pages 98-99

5. Good Governance and Integrity

18min
pages 89-95

4. The Nature of Principles in the Legal Theory

7min
pages 86-88

3. The Relationship between Law and Values

5min
pages 84-85

6. Conclusions

4min
pages 78-79

5. Good Governance on the International Level

12min
pages 73-77

2. Dworkin and Hart

8min
pages 81-83

4. Good Governance on the European Union Level

14min
pages 68-72

3. Good Governance and the Europeanization of National Law

4min
pages 66-67

2. Good Governance on the National Level in Europe

25min
pages 57-65

7. Conclusions

2min
page 49

4. Good Governance and the Main Developments

9min
pages 34-36

2. Concept of Good Governance

8min
pages 41-43

6. Conclusions

3min
pages 38-39

4. Institutions Involved within a Framework of Checks and Balances

6min
pages 45-47

Implementation of Good Governance in the United Kingdom

2min
page 31

2. Good Governance and Law

2min
page 30

5. Structure of the Three Parts of this Book

2min
page 37

3. Specification of the Principles of Good Governance

2min
page 44
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.