Good Governance , Concept & Context

Page 154

9 The Principle of Participation Participation is defined as the active involvement of a group of individuals in a collective process. Within the context of public administration, participation refers to the involvement of citizens in actual or intended actions of administrative authorities. It has strong links with democracy and the theory on deliberative democracy.1 Involvement can have different outlooks depending on the context in which it occurs. Participation can refer to taking part in preliminary arrangements, influencing decision-​makers, or taking part in actual decision-​making processes.2 But participation can also be justified from the point of view of a sensible government discovering potential flaws and realizing ownership. Is there any obligation of the administration to pay deference to the views of the citizens? It should be noted that although the term ‘public participation’ presumes that the initiative and procedures are in the hands of citizens, the participation process is generally managed by public entities. A definition formulated by the African Development Foundation seems to be both clear and concise: Participation is a process through which all members of a community or organization are involved in and have influence on decisions related to development activities that will affect them. That implies that development projects will address those community or group needs on which members have chosen to focus, and that all phases of the development process will be characterized by active involvement of community or organization members.3

An interesting aspect is the development of the participation principle with regard to participation as a right, and the question of what consequences there are for the direct and guiding function of the administration.4 The significance of participation is an important part of the development of the principles of good governance under the democratic rule of law as well. Public participation can be motivated by various reasons aside from genuine motives of public participation. The literature5 distinguishes between democratic, constitutional, corporatist, and administrative motives. Democratic motives are opportunities for citizens and groups of citizens to influence and regulate policy. An aim of the constitutional motive for participation is participation as means of protecting individual interests in the context of the balance of powers in the state. The corporatist motive is described as a means for social organizations to achieve their own responsibility. The administrative motive is to have participation serve the interests of the public body. While the distinction between these motives for participation is not always unequivocal, these do offer an indication of the various perspectives—​and consequently motives—​of the parties involved in public participation. With regards to participation, a distinction can also be made between which type of participation is pursued and the levels of which type of actual participation are achieved, that is, form and degree of participation. A distinction between the various 1 5

Akerboom 2018. Vucsán 1995.

2

Vucsán 1995.

3

ADF 2014.

4

Addink 2008.

Good Governance: Concept and Context. Henk Addink. © Henk Addink 2019. Published 2019 by Oxford University Press.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Index

44min
pages 332-353

Bibliography

38min
pages 306-331

Governance

14min
pages 301-305

2. Part II: The Specification of the Principles of Good Governance

8min
pages 298-300

4. Conclusions

9min
pages 291-294

of Human Rights

2min
page 290

2. Good Governance in International Case Law

2min
page 289

Ombudsman

17min
pages 280-285

4. Conclusions

3min
pages 286-287

Court of Justice

30min
pages 270-279

Institutions

2min
page 269

16. Implementation of Good Governance Principles on the European Level

2min
page 268

5. Conclusions

2min
pages 266-267

South Africa

13min
pages 261-265

3. Implementation of the Good Governance Principles in Canada

21min
pages 253-260

7. Conclusions

12min
pages 220-224

2. Implementation of Good Governance in Northern Europe

2min
page 226

6. Cases about the Implementation of Good Governance Principles

5min
pages 218-219

5. Different Developments in the Practices of Different Countries

2min
page 217

2. Concept and Principles of Good Governance and Integrity

2min
page 212

Practices of Good Governance

6min
pages 214-216

the Non-EU Country Studies

1min
page 213

1. Good Governance: The Need and the Practical Relevance

2min
page 211

6. Conclusions

1min
pages 207-209

5. Sources of the Principle of Human Rights

14min
pages 201-206

3. Specification of the Concept

2min
page 198

2. The Concept of the Principle of Human Rights

2min
page 197

4. Institutions Involved

4min
pages 199-200

6. Conclusions

1min
page 195

5. Sources of the Principle of Accountability

5min
pages 193-194

2. The Concept of Accountability

5min
pages 183-184

6. Sources of the Principle of Effectiveness

5min
pages 179-180

7. Conclusions

1min
page 181

5. Institutions Involved

10min
pages 175-178

4. Specification of this Concept

2min
page 174

3. The Concept of Effectiveness

12min
pages 170-173

6. Conclusions

3min
pages 164-165

2. Development of the Principle of Effectiveness

5min
pages 168-169

3. Specification of the Concept

10min
pages 157-160

5. Sources of the Principle of Participation

5min
pages 162-163

4. Institutions Involved

2min
page 161

1. The Development of the Principle of Participation

2min
page 155

9. The Principle of Participation

2min
page 154

2. The Concept of Participation

2min
page 156

6. Conclusions

2min
pages 152-153

5. Sources of the Principle of Transparency

20min
pages 145-151

4. Institutions Involved

8min
pages 142-144

3. Specification of the Concept

7min
pages 139-141

2. The Concept of Transparency

5min
pages 137-138

2. The Concept of Properness

2min
page 125

5. Conclusions

1min
pages 121-123

3. Specification of the Concept

21min
pages 126-133

3. Democracy and Transparency

2min
page 119

4. Democracy and Participation

2min
page 120

2. Democracy: Direct and Representative

2min
page 118

6. The Role of Good Governance Related to these Developments

2min
page 114

7. Conclusions

1min
page 115

3. Rule of Law and Rechtsstaat: Specification of Differences

5min
pages 106-107

5. Difficulties and Developments of the Traditional Rule of Law

5min
pages 112-113

4. Rule of Law and Rechtsstaat: Formal and Substantial Perspectives

11min
pages 108-111

2. Different Historical Roots and Traditional Perspectives

2min
page 105

7. Conclusions

3min
pages 98-99

5. Good Governance and Integrity

18min
pages 89-95

4. The Nature of Principles in the Legal Theory

7min
pages 86-88

3. The Relationship between Law and Values

5min
pages 84-85

6. Conclusions

4min
pages 78-79

5. Good Governance on the International Level

12min
pages 73-77

2. Dworkin and Hart

8min
pages 81-83

4. Good Governance on the European Union Level

14min
pages 68-72

3. Good Governance and the Europeanization of National Law

4min
pages 66-67

2. Good Governance on the National Level in Europe

25min
pages 57-65

7. Conclusions

2min
page 49

4. Good Governance and the Main Developments

9min
pages 34-36

2. Concept of Good Governance

8min
pages 41-43

6. Conclusions

3min
pages 38-39

4. Institutions Involved within a Framework of Checks and Balances

6min
pages 45-47

Implementation of Good Governance in the United Kingdom

2min
page 31

2. Good Governance and Law

2min
page 30

5. Structure of the Three Parts of this Book

2min
page 37

3. Specification of the Principles of Good Governance

2min
page 44
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.