Good Governance , Concept & Context

Page 66

Good Governance and the Europeanization of National Law

41

Finally, research on the same topic has been conducted, mainly concerned with the concretization of principles of good administrative behaviour by the ECJ.56 There is a study based on the subdivision of six principles of good governance, referred to earlier.57 The study shows that principles of responsible administration were initially applied in the context of political responsibility, although these are not given substance just through legal rules, but also through courts of audit.58 The principles of participatory administration have been given a mainly formal, procedural content by both the courts and the European Ombudsman. The principles of transparent administration relate in particular to the accessibility of documents and the public nature of decision-​ making. The Court has acknowledged the principle of transparent administration as well. The Ombudsman links human rights principles relating to the administration with bad administration, whereas the Court considered these human rights principles by themselves. The principles of proper administration are afforded wider application by both bodies, although the Court is more the frontrunner and the Ombudsman the runner-​up. Is any legal tradition recognizable in this development? Not even one. The European Union has generated its own particular blend of traditions. Although the administrative system of the European Union was initially modelled on the French system, subsequent developments have led to a growing emphasis on individual rights in administrative procedures. 59 As seen above, many actors have been involved in the development of principles of good administrative behaviour, all in their own way. These actors include the European Court of Human Rights, the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance, the European Ombudsman, and some of the member states of the European Union. As the European Convention on Human Rights and its protocols become increasingly significant for the European Union, they may influence the further development of these principles, and even the principles of good governance in general.

3. Good Governance and the Europeanization of National Law The developments of principles of good administration in the sphere of the European Union are not solely confined to European institutions.60 Gradually, these developments influence the administrative law of the member states. Indeed, we are witnessing an ongoing process of Europeanization and this is not a recent development. While it is not completely new, the literature nowadays clearly recognizes that European law and administrative law are converging. That is not only in the relationship between European law and national administrative law but also in the interaction between international law and national administrative law.61 Moreover, a stronger foundation is needed as the influence reaches beyond the traditional notion of sovereignty, especially as far as territoriality is concerned.62 Oldenziel 2003. Participation, transparency, effectiveness, accountability, proportionality, and human rights, see Addink 2005. 58 Oldenziel 2003, ch 10, Conclusions. 59 For a discussion on countervailing tendencies, see Harlow 1988, 10. 60 61 Prechal and Widdershoven 2017. Schmidt-​Assmann 2008, 2061–​79. 62 Ibid, 2061. 56 57


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Index

44min
pages 332-353

Bibliography

38min
pages 306-331

Governance

14min
pages 301-305

2. Part II: The Specification of the Principles of Good Governance

8min
pages 298-300

4. Conclusions

9min
pages 291-294

of Human Rights

2min
page 290

2. Good Governance in International Case Law

2min
page 289

Ombudsman

17min
pages 280-285

4. Conclusions

3min
pages 286-287

Court of Justice

30min
pages 270-279

Institutions

2min
page 269

16. Implementation of Good Governance Principles on the European Level

2min
page 268

5. Conclusions

2min
pages 266-267

South Africa

13min
pages 261-265

3. Implementation of the Good Governance Principles in Canada

21min
pages 253-260

7. Conclusions

12min
pages 220-224

2. Implementation of Good Governance in Northern Europe

2min
page 226

6. Cases about the Implementation of Good Governance Principles

5min
pages 218-219

5. Different Developments in the Practices of Different Countries

2min
page 217

2. Concept and Principles of Good Governance and Integrity

2min
page 212

Practices of Good Governance

6min
pages 214-216

the Non-EU Country Studies

1min
page 213

1. Good Governance: The Need and the Practical Relevance

2min
page 211

6. Conclusions

1min
pages 207-209

5. Sources of the Principle of Human Rights

14min
pages 201-206

3. Specification of the Concept

2min
page 198

2. The Concept of the Principle of Human Rights

2min
page 197

4. Institutions Involved

4min
pages 199-200

6. Conclusions

1min
page 195

5. Sources of the Principle of Accountability

5min
pages 193-194

2. The Concept of Accountability

5min
pages 183-184

6. Sources of the Principle of Effectiveness

5min
pages 179-180

7. Conclusions

1min
page 181

5. Institutions Involved

10min
pages 175-178

4. Specification of this Concept

2min
page 174

3. The Concept of Effectiveness

12min
pages 170-173

6. Conclusions

3min
pages 164-165

2. Development of the Principle of Effectiveness

5min
pages 168-169

3. Specification of the Concept

10min
pages 157-160

5. Sources of the Principle of Participation

5min
pages 162-163

4. Institutions Involved

2min
page 161

1. The Development of the Principle of Participation

2min
page 155

9. The Principle of Participation

2min
page 154

2. The Concept of Participation

2min
page 156

6. Conclusions

2min
pages 152-153

5. Sources of the Principle of Transparency

20min
pages 145-151

4. Institutions Involved

8min
pages 142-144

3. Specification of the Concept

7min
pages 139-141

2. The Concept of Transparency

5min
pages 137-138

2. The Concept of Properness

2min
page 125

5. Conclusions

1min
pages 121-123

3. Specification of the Concept

21min
pages 126-133

3. Democracy and Transparency

2min
page 119

4. Democracy and Participation

2min
page 120

2. Democracy: Direct and Representative

2min
page 118

6. The Role of Good Governance Related to these Developments

2min
page 114

7. Conclusions

1min
page 115

3. Rule of Law and Rechtsstaat: Specification of Differences

5min
pages 106-107

5. Difficulties and Developments of the Traditional Rule of Law

5min
pages 112-113

4. Rule of Law and Rechtsstaat: Formal and Substantial Perspectives

11min
pages 108-111

2. Different Historical Roots and Traditional Perspectives

2min
page 105

7. Conclusions

3min
pages 98-99

5. Good Governance and Integrity

18min
pages 89-95

4. The Nature of Principles in the Legal Theory

7min
pages 86-88

3. The Relationship between Law and Values

5min
pages 84-85

6. Conclusions

4min
pages 78-79

5. Good Governance on the International Level

12min
pages 73-77

2. Dworkin and Hart

8min
pages 81-83

4. Good Governance on the European Union Level

14min
pages 68-72

3. Good Governance and the Europeanization of National Law

4min
pages 66-67

2. Good Governance on the National Level in Europe

25min
pages 57-65

7. Conclusions

2min
page 49

4. Good Governance and the Main Developments

9min
pages 34-36

2. Concept of Good Governance

8min
pages 41-43

6. Conclusions

3min
pages 38-39

4. Institutions Involved within a Framework of Checks and Balances

6min
pages 45-47

Implementation of Good Governance in the United Kingdom

2min
page 31

2. Good Governance and Law

2min
page 30

5. Structure of the Three Parts of this Book

2min
page 37

3. Specification of the Principles of Good Governance

2min
page 44
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.