„Who would want to be an architecture student? ”„Dear architects, I am sick of your shit.” by p (i) l o t architecture platform

Dragons’ Den glass dildos

Architectural Association school computer design

Rem Koolhaas

imagination

AutoCAD shortcuts

Renaissance

Architects Registration Board drugs

concrete vagina

p (i) l o t

architecture platform « Archive »

„Who would want to be an architecture student? ” „Dear architects, I am sick of your shit.” Tom DYCKHOFF Annie CHOI

issue #3

// Dragoş MILOTIN // Alexandru SENCIUC // Alexandru VOICU // // Corina NICOLAE // Vlad TODIROAE

p (i) l o t architecture platform Bucharest, Romania

Project Coordinator Dragos MILOTIN Project Partners Alexandru SENCIUC, Alexandru VOICU Project Members Corina NICOLAE, Vlad TODIROAE

You may not, except with our express written permission, distribute or commercially exploit the content. Nor may you transmit it or store it in any other website or other form of electronic retrieval system. The information contained in this article is for general information purposes only. The article is provided by p (i) l o t architecture platform.

Discover more at p-i-l-o-t.blogspot.com

p (i) l o t architecture platform is a communication and culture platform generated by students from the University of Architecture and Urbanism ''Ion Mincu'' Bucharest. The main purpose is to generate discussions among people with ideas and similar interests: Architecture, Design, Urbanism, Arts, Culture, Sociology. The environment is one of informal discussions. ''Spoken lessons, without formality, antiacademic without stylistic and literary ambitions, full of repetitions and the formulation of fleeting thoughts, interrupted by reversals which stray, strolling along the drawing boards.''* The p(i)lot magazine is a collection of articles written by students, professors and professionists which exclusively published within this magazine. It is structured in four points starting with the main one called Symposium, a public discussion translated into virtual space. The second point is the Interview which is seeks to bring the outside (in a broader social and often different cultural context) opinions, attitudes and examples. Concept refers to articles of interest which have new ideas, issues and current paradigms. In complementarity, Archive contains articles which have been published, forgotten, lost, although their content is still the current one. Using walls to bring down walls is an electronic public library whose purpose is to bring closer the information necessary to build an inspiring background to the p(i)lot project.The library covers a wide range of areas and is formed in a subjective way. We want this information to develop in the form of an exchange and our proposal interests you, we will provide you the right to post. Our team members organize and participate to numerous events held by important names in architecture and people who have a word or two to say in matters of art and culture, the conference will later be published in the "Events" section in a media format. The approach addresses a wider range of people, given that architecture has seen a boom in recent years at an ideational level and captured an impressive number of people.

The project targets students and teachers in first instance from the University "Ion Mincu'', but is open to anyone. We want to open your appetite for architecture and discussion between all those who are in this profession and not only in order to take advantage of this theoretical and media platform as a source of inspiration for future projects. In order for the project p(i)lot to succed anyone interested to participate in the construction of this platform is welcome in the community. If you have proposals or any comments do not hesitate to contact us.

p (i) l o t architecture platform

Arhivă #3 , 02.02.2011

Tom Dyckhoff

Who would want to be an architecture student? Bad pay, few jobs and an uncertain future? Who’d want to be an architecture student in the current climate?

The text has appeared in “The Times “,on October 15, 2009

Emma Tubbs is crouched on scuffed lino in a bleached-white corridor outside her tutor’s office. She’s not alone. The corridor is crammed with students, each hugging work bound in portfolios, or complicated squiggles on cardboard purporting to be the future of architecture. It’s freshers’ week at the Bartlett School of Architecture at University College London. For architecture students up and down the country freshers’ week is rather more tense than for other undergraduates. They are not just coping with normal fresher stuff — making their own bed and learning how to neck pints in ten seconds. In most architecture faculties students and tutors alike have to submit to the gruelling process of hustings — like Dragons’ Den, only here the dragons get frightened too. The previous day, sets of tutors competed for students in a series of 20-minute pitches delivered in the lecture hall. Now the students compete for places with the tutors in a string of interviews over 48 hours. Tubbs is about to have hers. “I’m a little frantic, you could say that, yes,” she laughs. “I really want this tutor.” “It can end in tears,” says Nic Clear, the Bartlett’s director of fourth and fifth-year students. “I mean for the tutors. They worry about it all summer. What if no student picks them?” This new bunch of architecture students, though, has added reasons to be worried. The recession has decimated the construction industry. Unemployment among architects has risen more than in any other profession. Architectural firms are in the red. Even Norman Foster’s fêted company has had its losses double in a year, from £8.5 million to £16.1 million — and that after laying off 400 staff. Fifteen years

p (i) l o t architecture platform

Arhivă #3 , 02.02.2011

ago I graduated from the Bartlett during another recession. That was bad enough. This one, though, is a lot worse. To cap it all, Britain is producing more architecture graduates than ever — more, some say, than the construction industry actually needs. A decade ago Britain’s universities were churning out 1,000 a year. Now it’s 1,400. The Bartlett alone attracts 1,800 applicants for 90 places. Five new architectural schools have opened in the past decade. And, after seven years of training and tens of thousands of pounds in debt, the average graduate is competing with hundreds of others for not many jobs. “What I find most insulting,” says Tubbs, a fourth-year student, “is that after all that training I’ve got friends who are starting on salaries of under 20 grand.” David Melia, queueing next to her, joins the chorus of disapproval. “You go to parties and people say, ‘Oh, you’re an architect, you must earn loads of money.’ Er, no.” Average salaries for architects are about £40,000 — £70,000 less than doctors or dentists. “You don’t go into architecture for money, stability and a job for life,” Tubbs says cheerily. Laura Allen, who runs the bachelor course, puts it another way: “Architecture’s still dominated by the well-off, the privately educated.” So, what do you go into architecture for? Iain Borden, the head at Bartlett, puts much of the rise down to the Grand Designs factor. “Architecture is much more visible nowadays,” he says. “It’s on the TV. Icon projects are a factor. Students see them on adverts or on holiday. People such as Norman Foster are household names.” Allen agrees. “We get students at 18 who all like Foster and the Guggenheim in Bilbao and Santiago Calatrava. Architecture is a bit cool. But it’s also a career, so the parents like it too. Everyone’s happy.” The students I meet prove the point. Thanks to a more box-ticking, exam-orientated system — and the prospect of debt — they’re far more focused than my generation was. Even 18-year-olds here talk about the “edge” a Bartlett degree will give them in the jobs market. “I enjoyed art at school, but I wouldn’t want to be an artist,” says Alexander Holloway, a confident third-year. “The art market is

p (i) l o t architecture platform

Arhivă #3 , 02.02.2011

flooded. Here you get to see a tutor every week. Some places you see them once a term. After all, we’re paying for the education.” “Architecture students aren’t like other students,” Allen says. “They’ve always worked a damned sight harder. You won’t find them living up to the student stereotype. “Hundred-hour weeks are quite normal,” Allen says. “Flatmates never get to see them. They’re strangers in their own home because they’re here working till dawn day after day.” It has to be like that, she adds. “Architecture is an immensely broad subject. It straddles arts and sciences. You have to learn the past 200 years of knowledge about building, cities, landscapes, sociology. And you have to have designed — and come up with the brief and the site for — five or six buildings by the time you leave, right down to the smallest detail. And then you’ve got to learn actually how to be an architect — the law, the business, the contracts, running a team. You just can’t do it in less than seven intense years.” On the plus side it fosters resilience. On the minus, architects live in a world hermetically sealed from the rest of us. “Architects marry other architects,” Allen says. Arrogance — as with the medical profession — is all about. What gets them through it, the students say, is the camaraderie of the unit system — the whole point of this week’s hustings. The system, by which students are divided into “units” of 15 or so, run by a couple of architects, was introduced in the early 1970s by the private Architectural Association school, in part to mimic the centuries-old atelier apprenticeship system. The reason hustings are so feverish is because which tutor, and student, you end up with matters. “Your unit will be your life for the next few years,” Clear says. “You work with them, you go drinking with them, you stay up designing night after night with them and, when you graduate, you’ll often end up in a job with them.” “Units are a bit like football teams,” Borden explains. “They’re all playing the same game — but each plays it differently. And you can be on only one side. Loyalty matters. It’s intensely competitive.” Each unit has a different take on architecture, just as each architecture school has a different ethos.

p (i) l o t architecture platform

Arhivă #3 , 02.02.2011

Some schools, such as the one at the University of Bath, are big on engineering and practical skills. Others, such as the one at the University of Cambridge, are sticklers for architectural history. And the Bartlett? “They do the crazy stuff,” says David Melia, a fourth-year student. “But that’s why people like me come here. For the creativity.” Clear puts it more diplomatically: “We like to encourage students to go off at tangents, to question things.” Some blame the Bartlett’s reputation for pushing creativity for the rise in iconic architecture obsessed with original forms. Out in the “real world” building contractors, developers, even some architectural firms, often accuse architecture schools of nurturing creativity over practical skills. Sit in on the hustings and you see where they’re coming from. One unit will design an “embassy for cyborgs”, another a toy factory that questions consumerism. Clear’s own unit teaches film-making, heavy on J. G. Ballardian dystopias. These, Clear admits, are at the “esoteric end”. But all the Bartlett’s units are defiantly experimental. Last year’s work is on show in the entrance hall. There are animated films encapsulating the notion of uncanny space, sophisticated computer drawings “made of complex algorithms that blur and intensify space”. Incredible work. But nothing you or I would recognise as a bona fide building with a front door and a roof. Leave the future to Bartlett students and we’ll all be living in car-crash spaces that occasionally come into focus as giant mechanised spindly crustacea. But “you’ve got to teach them how to think about space first and foremost,” Clear says. “Under what might look like the most far-out project real-life themes are there.” Themes such as the “grand challenges” that underpin every course — health, sustainability, intercultural interaction and wellbeing. The architecture degree also has to comply with subject areas laid down by the Royal Institute of British Architects and the Architects Registration Board . But each school can determine exactly how that’s done. “And think what else we teach them,” Clear says. “Software skills, computer design, imagination, how to conjure up from nothing a building with integrity.” If it were left to architectural practices alone to train architects, Borden says, “nobody would learn about the Italian Renaissance, just how to put together tender packages.” You do wonder, though, about this year’s graduates. The Bartlett’s have fared better than most. This is,

p (i) l o t architecture platform

Arhivă #3 , 02.02.2011

after all, the Oxbridge of architecture, though many end up nowhere near architecture. Some of Clear’s graduates now make promo films for Björk and Audi. Two from the experimental Unit 14, Harry Parr and Sam Bompas, make architectural jellies for A-list clients. “We teach students to be flexible, and optimistic,” Clear says. “I bet you architects have a low suicide rate. There’s always the next project.” So what’s the point? I’ll leave you with a third-year, Alexander Holloway: “At the end you think, ‘Yeah I did achieve something, I created something. And it’s all mine.’ What a feeling.”

p (i) l o t architecture platform

Arhivă #3 , 02.02.2011

Annie Choi

Dear architects, I am sick of your shit ( An Open Letter)

Dear architects, I am sick of your shit. Once, a long time ago, in the days of yore, I had a friend who was studying architecture to become, presumably, an architect. This friend introduced me to other friends, who were also studying architecture. Then these friends had other friends who were architects - real architects doing real architecture like designing luxury condos that look a lot like glass dildos. And these real Architects knew other real architects and now the only people I know are architects. And they all design glass dildos that I will never work or live in and serve only to obstruct my view of New Jersey. Do not get me wrong, architects. I like you as a person. I think you are nice, smell good most of the time, and I like your glasses. You have crazy hair, and if you are lucky, most of it is on your head. But I do not care about architecture. It is true. This is what I do care about:burritoshedgehogscoffeeAs you can see, architecture is not on the list. I believe that architecture falls somewhere between toenail fungus and invasive colonoscopy in the list of things that interest me. Perhaps if you didn’t talk about it so much, I would be more interested. When you point to a glass cylinder and say proudly, hey my office designed that, I giggle and say it looks like a bong. You turn your head in disgust and shame. You think, obviously she does not understand. What does she know? She is just a writer. She is no architect. She respects vowels, not glass cocks. And then you say now I am designing a lifestyle center, and I ask what is that, and you say it is a place that offers goods and services and retail opportunities and I say you mean like a mall and you say no. it is a lifestyle center. I say it sounds like a mall. I am form the Valley, bitch. I know malls. Architects, I will not lie, you confuse me. You work sixty, eighty hours a week and yet you are always poor. Why aren’t you buying me a drink? Where is your bounty of riches? Maybe you spent it on merlot. Maybe you spent it on hookers and blow. I cannot be sure. It is a mystery. I will leave that to the scientists to figure out.

p (i) l o t architecture platform

Arhivă #3 , 02.02.2011

Architects love to discuss how much sleep they have gotten. One will say how he was at the studio until five in the morning, only to return again two hours later. Then another will say, oh that is nothing. I haven’t slept in a week. And then another will say, guess what, I have never slept ever. My dear architects, the measure of how hard you’ve worked and how much you’ve accomplished is not related to the number of hours you have not slept. Have you heard of Rem Koolhass? He is a famous architect. I know this because you tell me he is a famous architect. I hear that Rem Koolhaas is always sleeping. He is, I presume, sleeping right now. And I hear he gets shit done. And I also hear that in a stunning move, he is making a building that looks not like a glass cock, but like a concrete vagina. When you sleep more, you get vagina. You can all take a lesson form Rem Koolhaas. Live is hard for me, please understand. Architects are an important part of my existence. They call me at eleven at night and say they just got off of work, am I hungry? Listen, it is practically midnight. I ate hours ago. So long ago that, in fact, I am hungry again. So yes, I will go. Then I will go and there will be other architects talking about AutoCAD shortcuts and something about electric panels and can you believe that is all I did today, what a drag. I look around the table at the poor, tired, and hungry, and think of myself, I have but only one bullet left in the gun. Who will I choose? I have a friend who is a doctor. He gives me drugs. I enjoy them. I have a friend who is a lawyer. He helped me sue my landlord. My architect friends have given me nothing. No drugs, no medical advice, and they don’t know how to spell subpoena. One architect friend figured out that my apartment was one hundred and eighty seven square feet. That was nice. Thanks for that. I suppose one could ask what someone like me brings to architects like yourselves. I bring cheer. I yell at architects whet they start talking about architecture. I force them to discuss far more interesting topics, like turkey eggs. Why do we eat chicken eggs, but not turkey eggs? They are bigger. And people really like turkey. See? I am not afraid to ask the tough questions. So, dear architects, I will stick around, for only a little while. I hope that one day some of you will become doctors and lawyers or will figure out my taxes. And we will laugh at the days when you spent the entire evening talking about some European you ve never met who designed a building you will never see because you are too busy working on something what will never get built. But even if that day doesn’t arrive, give me a call anyway, I am free.

publisher’s acknowledgments The team of p (i) l o t architecture platform has published these texts in the category of “ FAIR USE NOTICE”.

"Who would want to be an architecture student? " , " Dear architects, I am sick of your shit", Tom DYCKHOFF Annie CHOI

p (i) l o t architecture platform