Lviv2022eng by ppp85

Concept Study - May 11, 2012

OLYMPIC WINTER GAMES LVIV 2022

Imprint

AS&P - Albert Speer & Partner

PROPROJEKT

Architekten, Planer

Planungsmanagement & Projektberatung GmbH

Hedderichstraße 108–110

Hedderichstraße 108–110 60596 Frankfurt am Main Phone: + 49 (0) 69 Fax: + 49 (0) 69

Germany

60 50 11

400

60596 Frankfurt am Main Phone: + 49 (0) 69

444

Fax: + 49 (0) 69

Internet: www.proprojekt.de

60 50 11

500

Internet: www.as-p.de

E-Mail: mail@proprojekt.de

E-Mail: mail@as-p.de

Managing Partners

Hanskarl Protzmann

Germany

Managing Partners

Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard Brand, Architect BDA, AIV

Dipl.-Ing. Stefan Klos

Dipl.-Ing. Friedbert Greif, AIV Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Albert Speer, Architect BDA

Trade Register

Frankfurt am Main no. B 41082 Tax ID no. DE177440166

Frankfurt am Main no. B 25310 Tax ID no. DE114116375

Preliminary Note The concept study at hand has been prepared in a very short time of four weeks only. It is based on a three-day visit to the proposed sites on April 03 to 05, 2012 and the thereafter provided information by the nominated representatives of the city, the Oblast and the Sports Federations. The accuracy of this data could not be verified in the time given. It is therefore important to note, that the developed Games Plan and thus the conclusions on the required budget is of preliminary character. The results of the study have to be understood as an exemplary concept how Olympic Winter Games in Lviv and the region could work. To come to a consolidated concept serving as a sound basis for an Olympic Bid and the first investment decisions in 2013, it is of vital importance to further coordinate and detail the concept together with all relevant stakeholders.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

Content Executive Summary 1.

Introduction

1.1 1.2 1.3

Requirements & Benchmarks

12 14 15

Games Concept Competition Venues Non-Competition Venues Transport Accommodation Finance IOC Evaluation

Games Concept

3.1 3.2

Olympic Winter Games Concept Study - Approach & Objectives Bidding Process

2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7

19 23 24 25 26 28 29

Venue Zones Major Challenges

Master Plan - Lviv Ice Zone

4.1 4.2 4.2.1 4.2.2 4.2.3 4.2.4 4.2.5 4.2.6 4.2.7 4.2.8 4.3 4.4

ProProjekt

31 34

Overview Olympic Park Opening and Closing Ceremony Figure Skating/ Short Track Ice Hockey 1 Speed Skating Curling Olympic Village Main Media Village International Broadcast Centre (IBC), Main Press Centre (MPC) Ice Hockey 2 Luge, Bobsleigh, Skeleton

AS&P

April 2012

36 37 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 45 46 47

4.5

Freestyle - Aerials

Master Plan - Tysovets Snow Zone

5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6

Overview Snow Village Media Village/ Sub Media Centre Precinct A: Board and Ski Centre Precinct B: Nordic Centre Precinct C: Ski Jump Centre

51 52 52 53 53 54

Master Plan - Volovets Alpine Arena

6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4

Overview Athletes Accommodation Media Accommodation Ski Alpine

Transport

7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.4.1 7.4.2 7.4.3 7.5 7.5.1 7.5.2 7.5.3 7.5.4 7.6

55 57 58 58 59

National & International Access Existing Regional & Local Transport Infrastructure Objectives and Requirements of the IOC Olympic Winter Games Quantity Framework General Assumptions Origin of Spectators Peak Loads Transportation Concept General Concept Lviv Ice Zone Tysovets Snow Zone Volovets Alpine Arena Proposed Measures

Accommodation

8.1 8.2 8.3

ProProjekt

61 62 64 65 66 67 68 69 69 70 72 74 76

Olympic Family Accommodation Fan Accommodation Accommodation Strategy

AS&P

April 2012

79 80 83

Finance

9.1 9.2 9.3

10.

Bid Budget OCOG-Budget Non-OCOG-Budget

84 86 88

Recommendations

10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4

ProProjekt

Road Map to October 2013 Organisational Structure Budget for the Pre-Bid Phase Rules of Conduct

AS&P

April 2012

93 94 95 96

Executive Summary

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

After successfully bidding for the UEFA Euro 2012 and the Euro Basket 2015, Ukraine intends to apply for the Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games 2022 in the city of Lviv. The biggest multisport event in winter would be an outstanding opportunity to strengthen the countryâ&#x20AC;&#x2DC;s position on the world map of sports and tourism, and to boost infrastructure development in western Ukraine.

Games Concept As a general result of the on hand concept study, it can be summarised that Lviv - being a charming city with a young population which is very passionate about sports - has the general potential to host Olympic Winter Games, although the city and the region still fundamentally lack in sports venues, accommodation capacities and transport infrastructure. The geographical location and climate conditions generally provide the opportunity to offer a compact bipolar Games concept as viiv seen in Vancouver 2010 and as planned for Sochi 2014 LLvi and PyeongChang 2018.

It is proposed to host all ice sports in Lviv, while all snow sports could be allocated in the areas of Tysovets and Volovets, in the Carpathian Mountains. 1

Executive Summary

Lviv-Ice Zone

Lvi L viiv Str t yi y

T ska Tru s vet ets et s

1 Tysove Tys ov ts ove s Skole Sko S le

Lviv-Ice Zone S vsk Sla vske e

Str t yi y

Tysovets-Snow Zone

Vol o ove ol o ts ov

T ska Tru s vet ets et s

Volovets Alpine Arena

Tysove Tys ov ts ove s Skole Sko S le

S vsk Sla vske e

Tysovets-Snow Zone Alpine Skiing

Ice Hockey

Airport

Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required

Biathlon

Luge

Athletes' Accomodation

Existing infrastructure, permanent works required

Bobsleigh

Nordic Combined

International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Cross-Country Skiing

Short Track Speed Skating

Main Hotel Area

Curling

Skeleton

Main Press Centre (MPC)

Figure Skating

Ski Jumping

Medal Ceremonies

Freestyle (Aerials)

Snowboard (SBX)

Media Village

Games Concept with Venue Locations Freestyle (Moguls)

Snowboard (PGS)

Opening & Closing Ceremonies

Vol o ove ol o ts ov

Volovets Alpine Arena

Freestyle (Ski-Halfpipe)

Snowboard (Halfpipe) Snowboard (Slopestyle)

Alpine Skiing

Ice Hockey

Freestyle (Slopestyle) Airport

Biathlon

Luge

Freestyle (Ski Cross) Speed Skating Athletes' Accomodation

Bobsleigh

Nordic Combined

International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Short Track Speed Skating

Main Hotel Area

Cross-Country Skiing

ProProjekt Curling

AS&P

April 2012 Skeleton

Main Press Centre (MPC)

Figure Skating

Ski Jumping

Medal Ceremonies

Freestyle (Aerials)

Snowboard (SBX)

Media Village

Planned permanent infrastructure (irrespective of the Games) Additional permanent infrastructure (Games dependent) Temporary venues required for the Olympic Winter Games 0

10 km

50 km

Olympic Family Hotel Olympicinfrastructure, Village Existing no permanent works required Railway Station

Existing infrastructure, permanent worksCentre required Snow Park Media Planned permanent infrastructure (irrespective of the Games)

Additional permanent infrastructure (Games dependent) Temporary venues required for the Olympic Winter Games 0

10 km

50 km

Lviv Ice Zone The area around the newly built Arena Lviv is suitable to serve as a most compact Olympic Park, being in line with the long-term planning strategy of the city. Three new halls for ice hockey, figure skating/ short track and speed skating could be used for training, professional clubs and cultural events after the Games. Halls without a reasonable post use are proposed to be built temporarily for legacy reasons. The already envisaged trade fair and convention facility could host the Main Media Centre (IBC/ MPC) and the curling events temporarily during Games time. An already projected venue for Bobsleigh, Skeleton and Luge would represent the fist inner-city sliding track in modern Olympic history. Another multi-purpose arena, as well as three training ice-rinks located in the city would add to the much needed sports opportunities for both, universities and the community.

Tysovets Snow Zone The existing training centre in Tysovets, 130 km south of Lviv, could host all nordic disciplines such as biathlon, cross country, nordic combined and ski jumping as well as the freestyle and snowboard competitions. Volovets Alpine Arena As the altitude in Tysovets does not meet the technical FIS requirements for the Alpine disciplines, an additional venue and athletesâ&#x20AC;&#x2DC; hotel would be needed in the more distant Volovets, about 155 km from Lviv. However, as this region is planned to be developed for skiing-tourism irrespective of the bid, the Volovets Alpine Arena could add another legacy component to the overall concept.

Accommodation In order to meet the accommodation requirements of the Games at least another 14,000 rooms (12,500 classified hotel rooms and 1,500 in alternative accommodation), equaling a private investment of approx. EUR 840 million would have to be guaranteed and built by 2022. In addition, a required Olympic Village for 4,000 athletes and team officials and a Media Village for 6,500 media representatives in Lviv are proposed to cater for the rising demand in residential and social housing in the city after the Games. To accommodate the athletes and team officials in the Snow Zone, a hotel resort with 2,000 beds in Tysovets and an athletes hotel with 500 beds in Volovets would have to be developed. Post Games, the Snow Zone could serve as a centre of excellence for nordic sports as well as for leisure activities in the Lviv region. Another 3,500 beds for media representatives are either proposed to be spread within a radius of 30 km, or built temporary in direct proximity to the competition venues in Tysovets.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

Finance The implementation of this competitive Games Plan would call for significant capital investment in the general infrastructure of western Ukraine. Apart from a EUR 2.2 billion spendings in competition and non-competition venues, the major challenge would be the provision of adequate transport infrastructure for tens of thousands of spectators per day. As a result of a preliminary transport model, another EUR 1.8 billion would be needed for the upgrade of the rail and road network as well as for the capacity increase of Lviv International Airport.

Transport Competition venues Non-Competition venues Accommodation Other totAL eUr (MM)

Sum

Source of Funding

1,770

Public

710

Public

1,472

Public/ Private

833

Private

478

Public

5,263

Estimated Non-OCOG Budget (EUR 2012)

As the recent Host City elections have shown, the success of an Olympic bid is highly dependent on the political and financial commitment to such an ambitious project. Therefore it is not only necessary to fully back the multi-billion capital investments in infrastructure but also to cover any potential shortfall of the approximately EUR 1.3 billion operational budget of the Games by binding government guarantees. At the same time it is crucial to demonstrate the seriousness of a candidature by implementing the legacy components of the Games Plan irrespective of the outcome of the bid.

Recommendations It is crucial to demonstrate the seriousness of a candidature by implementing the legacy components of the Games Plan irrespective of the outcome of the bid. Due to the fundamental lack of required infrastructure, it is therefore recommended to start as soon as possible. This explicitly includes the detailed planning and first measures of certain â&#x20AC;&#x153;Legacy Projectsâ&#x20AC;? even before the official bid phase, which will start in October 2013. In order to make efficient use of this 18 months period, the first task would be the constitution and funding of a preliminary organisational structure to oversee and coordinate the Pre-Bid-Phase.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

The first main tasks can be summarized as follows: > The development of a bid strategy Recommendations ⁄ > The commissioning of detailed planning studies to agree upon the general concept (incl. venues, accommodation, transportation, Organisation in Pre-Bid Phaseenvironmental assessment, socio-economic

impact, etc.)

Government / NoC

Delivery Agency (Legacy Projects)

Pre-Bid Committee LVIV 2022

Steering Group

Venues

Co-ordination

Administration

Roads and Railways

Planning

Sports (NOC/NF)

Tourism

Communication

Olympic Experts

Proposed Organisational Chart

It is recommended to establish three bodies: The Delivery Agency (responsible for all Games related infrastructure projects), the Steering Group (advisory function with representatives from the administration, NOC and NFs as well as Olympic experts), and as the central coordination in the Pre-Bid Committee. PROPROJEKT / AS&P

Olympic Winter Games Lviv 2022 - Concept Study

27 April, 2012

›

For the Pre-Bid Phase a total budget of EUR 5.0 MM has been estimated. Depending on the agreement on “Legacy Projects” another EUR 45 MM might be required for the first measures by end of 2013.

2012 [MM €]

2013 [MM €]

Sum [MM €]

Co-ordination & administration

0,3

0,7

Master planning & studies

0,6

1,4

Communication & events

0,6

1,4

totAL

1.5

3.5

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

1. Introduction

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

1. Introduction In September 2015, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) will select the Host City for the XXIV. Olympic and XIII. Paralympic Winter Games 2022. Ukraine is currently assessing on a national level, if the city of Lviv is capable to welcome thousands of athletes, officials, media representatives and spectators from all over the world for this extraordinary event. Against this background PROPROJEKT – Planungsmanagement & Projektberatung GmbH and AS&P – Albert Speer & Partner GmbH, have been commissioned to assess a preliminary technical feasibility study within a time frame of 4 weeks, answering the following questions: > What is generally needed to bid for and host Olympic Winter Games? > Is Lviv capable to host the Olympic Winter Games, and if so, what is the potential of the city

to stage this event in 2022? > What has to be done to get there?

The findings of the work are summarised in this document as a basis for a general decision regarding the further proceedings by the Ukrainian Cabinet of Ministers in May 2012.

1.1 Olympic Winter Games The Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games are one of the biggest sport events on earth, providing the host with the great opportunity to create ever lasting memories for athletes and sports fans and bring the international focus of press and media to its country. 98 events in a minimum of 13 competition venues will take place within a time period of 16 days. This equals 17 World Championships at the same time! Not only 1.6 million ticket holders, thousands of athletes, officials and media representatives, but also more than 3 billion TV viewers create massive pressure on the host city to deliver the highest standard of organisation, operation and infrastructures, since as per IOC the host city is responsible for “establishing functions and services for all aspects of the Games, such as sports planning, venues, finance, technology, accommodation, catering, media services etc., as well as operations during the Games.”

Economic Parameters Hosting the Olympic Winter Games requires extensive multi-billion Euro investments, of which a large portion will have to be publicly funded. The benefit of an adaption of the infrastructure to Olympic needs will mainly include improvements of the transport infrastructure, construction or the renovation of sports facilities as well as general tourist infrastructures and city beautification. In addition many fields of private investments like hotels, tourist attractions and housing projects as required for the Olympic Village can be fostered.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

The improved infrastructure, a stronger identification with the own country and the city, as well as the bigger range of leisure facilities (incl. follow-up events like concerts, other sport events, trade fairs, etc.) enable a Host City (and region) to better position itself not only nationally but also globally. Like no other major event, Olympic Games are able to improve the “brand awareness” of a city and a region. The Olympic Games in Sydney 2000 and Barcelona 1992 have sufficiently proven this, but similar effects could be identified in Calgary before and after the Olympic Winter Games 1988. According to Price Waterhouse Coopers, the Sydney Olympic Games delivered substantial benefits not only to the city, but also to the region and nation. Some $ 3 billion in business outcomes (incl. 2 billion in post-Games sports infrastructure and service contracts), over $ 6 billion in inbound tourism spendings during 2001, up to $ 6.1 billion worth of international exposure and an injections of over $ 6 billion in infrastructure developments have been estimated by Price Waterhouse Coopers. Not to speak about the greatly enhanced business profile of Sydney. Also Barcelona and the region have benefitted substantially in the run up period to the Games according to Ferran Brunet. According to his market analysis, the unemployment rate of Barcelona fell by almost 9% from 18.4% to 9.6% between October 1986 and August 1992, while the national unemployment rate of Spain fell only by 5.4 % in the same period. Brunet estimated that in addition, Olympic-linked investment in infrastructure and facilities led to additional permanent employment of an estimated 20,000 people. The immediate impact of the Olympic Games was therefore highly notable. Economic effects as well as long-term improvements of attractiveness as a tourist destination, trade fair, congress or conference city, as well as business centre can be supported by hosting the Games. Furthermore, the Olympic Winter Games requires extensive planning and preparation in numerous areas and with it educated human resources. The Olympic Games do – for example – require the training of more than 100,000 persons, which are e.g. security, volunteers, Organising Committee staff, but also additionally required personal in retail, gastronomy and the hotel business. In addition, training and education in the public and private sector will be initiated, even though these effects are still limited to certain sectors.

Socio-economic Impact In several publications, analysis and evaluations of past events, it has been proven that the Olympic Games have a direct short-term impact on the host city and the region regarding local investments and regeneration. Benefits may come from added economic activity around hosting the Games (e.g. construction of sports infrastructure, tourism, retail), and can also lead to additional employment before, during and after the event. To ensure positive effects of hosting the Olympic Games, it is strongly recommended to align the Olympic developments with the longterm regional and national development concepts. When deciding for or against bidding for Olympic Games it is important not only to evaluate tangible economic effects, but to also weigh up the intangible socio-economic effects. Olympic Games can create numerous positive effects for the society. Therefore the sport with its values and ideals

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

and the impact on the life of the people should be major reasons to consider. Among others, the following intangible effects can be named: > Education and health (get more people to physical activity) > Development of sport excellence (high-performance sport) > Increase of cultural variety (high experience value for the population) > Facilitation of new standards regarding efficiency, flexibility and collaboration of authorities > Encouragement of the cooperation between public and private bodies for infrastructure pro-

jects (Public Private Partnership) > Build a positive image of the city and region

1.2 Concept Study - Approach & Objectives The general objective of the concept study is to evaluate the feasibility of hosting the Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games 2022 in Lviv in principle, identifying potential required measures to reach this target. This has been executed in a four step approach as follows:

Step 1: Requirements & Benchmarks Evaluation of the technical requirements and the comparison of concepts of previous bids, to assess the potentials for an internationally competitive application. Thereby the major fields of the Host City Election Procedures for 2014 (Sochi) and 2018 (PyeongChang, Munich, Annecy) have been highlighted.

Step 2: Analysis The areas of Lviv, Tysovets, Volovets Slavsk and Truskavets have been assessed regarding Olympic Games potential as well as the possible post-use.

Step 3: Concept Development Based on the results of step 1 and 2, the overall master plan vision comprising the following has been developed: > Allocation and initial concept of the competition and non-competition venues > Preliminary transportation concept assessing the existing capacities for air-, rail- and road

transport and defining the necessary measures to smoothly operate the Games > First accommodation concept assessing the existing hotel capacities and defining the neces-

sary measures to meet the IOC/ Games requirements > Rough estimation of the necessary financial resources according to the IOC budgeting-

approach (capital investments, operation and bid budget) Step 4: Recommendations (for the Next Steps) Strategic recommendations for the next steps to prepare an official Olympic Bid, focusing on the direct next steps until October 2013.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

1.3 Bidding Process In case Ukraine decides to bid for the XXIV. Olympic and XIII. Paralympic Winter Games 2022, the city of Lviv has to compete in two phases against the international competitors. In the first phase, the so called Applicant City Phase, the IOC will preselect the shortlist of qualified bidders in May 2014, based on the bidders reply to the official Questionnaire for Applicant Cities. In the following phase, the so called Candidate City Phase, the bid cities have to provide comprehensive bid books based on the IOC Candidature Procedure. Together with the results of the IOC Evaluation Commission, the Host City will then be selected in September 2015. According to the Olympic Charter, “the NOC (…) shall supervise and shall be jointly responsible for the actions and conduct of the Applicant City in relation to its application, and, as the case may be, to the city’s candidature to host the Olympic Games”. (Olympic Charter, Bye-law 1.4 to Rule 34) Therefore, a close cooperation would be required between the NOC and the city. Since the period from Applicant City registration in October 2013 until the submission of the Mini Bid Book in February 2014 is very short, it is recommended to start more detailed planning (and partially even implementation of selected projects) already in advance, in the so called Pre-Bid

Introduction ⁄ official IOC restrictions before submitting the registration letter to the IOC. Bidding Process

Phase. In addition to the organisational advantages, Lviv (as a potential bidder) can act with less

May 2012 to Oct 2013 Pre-Bid-Phase 2012

Nov 2013 to May 2014 Applicant City Phase

2013

Invitation to NOCs

Jun 2014 to Jul 2015 Candidate City Phase

2014

2015

Jul/Aug 2013

Registration Applicant Cities

Oct 2013

Submission Mini Bid Book

Feb 2014

Nomination Candidate Cities

May 2014

Submission Bid Book

Jan 2015

IOC Evaluation Commission

Feb-Apr 2015

HOST CITY ELECTION 2022 Source: Own Illustration based on the “IOC 2020 Deadlines”

2022 Bidding Process (own assumption based on the 2020 schedule) PROPROJEKT / AS&P

ProProjekt

AS&P

Lviv 2022 Concept Study – Site Inspection Visit

April 2012

SEP 2015

30 March, 2012

›

Applicant City File (Mini Bid Book) >

25 questions in 11 themes

1 page English/ French each

90 pages incl. annex

Chapters/ Themes > Vision, Concept and Legacy > Sport and Venues > Environment and Meteorology > Accommodation > Transport > Medical Services and Doping > Safety and Security

Example: Munich 2018 Mini Bid Book

> Technology and Energy > Legal aspects and Custom/ Immigration > Government and Public Support > Finance and Marketing

Applicant City Guarantees Guarantees regarding the following have to be provided in the Applicant City Phase (government/ city; NOC; national tourist board): > Respect of the Olympic Charter > Obligation to fulfill all necessary measures > Free access to and free movement around the host country for all accredited persons > Marketing Programme > Hotel rating and standard

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

Candidate City File (Bid Book) >

17 themes

500 pages in 3 volumes

Add. studies for finance & environment

Chapters/ Themes Chapters/ Themes – Vol. 1 > Vision, Legacy and Communication > Overall Concept of the Olympic Games > Political and Economical Climate and Struc. > Legal Aspects > Customs and Immigration Formalities > Environment and Meteorolgy > Finance

Example: Munich 2018 Bid Book

Chapters/ Themes – Vol. 3

> Marketing

> Medical Services/ Doping Control > Safety and Security

Chapters/ Themes – Vol. 2

> Accommodation

> Sports and Venues

> Transport

> Paralympic Games

> Technology

> Olympic Village(s)

> Media Operations

Candidate City Guarantees Guarantees regarding the following have to be provided in the Candidate City Phase (national, regional and local authorities; Bid Committee; NOC; venue owners; land owners; national tourist board; hoteliers): > Legal measures > Security, medical, immigration and other governmental services > Planning and construction (venues, Olympic Villages, IBC/ MPC, etc.) > Finance/ funding (cover of economic short falls, source of funding, etc.) > Hotel rooms (availablity, rates, min. stay/ room block waves, price control, etc.) > Marketing/ commercial rights > Transport (Olympic Lanes, public transport, traffic management, etc.) > WADA Code/ IOC anti-doping rules > Operations

All together more than 100 guarantees will be required from different bodies, authorities and entities. Especially the coordination of potentially hundreds of hotel/ accommodation operators and developers is recommended to be started at a very early stage, since individual negotiations may be time consuming. Since only a limited number of hotels is existing or already planned, governmental guarantees may be required to cover parts of the additionally required units. But since it is not only a question of developing the infrastructure, but also of operation, it is recommended to cover especially hotels by future developers/ operators.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

2. Requirements & Benchmarks

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

2. Requirements & Benchmarks In the following chapter the specifics in different fields of four Olympic bidders will be highlighted, to be able to set a foundation for the development of an internationally competitive concept for Lviv 2022. What where the different approaches to specific framework conditions? What did the IOC evaluate as positive? What criteria have to be fulfilled?

2.1 Games Concept Sochi 2014: Sochi 2014 envisions a compact two cluster concept with a central Olympic Park including the Olympic Stadium for the Opening and Closing Ceremony, the Main Media Centre (MMC) with 70,000 mÂ˛, the Olympic Village and hotels for the IOC and members of the Olympic Family. The Mountain cluster lies within a distance of 49 km (50 min.) to the Olympic Park and foresees a separate athletes village, from where the majority of the athletes reach their competition venues in less than 16 minutes. Both Olympic Villages have a total capacity of 5,500 beds. For the spectators a total hotel capacity of 45,000 rooms has been established.

Sochi 2014 - Map B (Source: Candidature File)

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

Despite the high amount of newly built competition venues (only four of eleven venues were existing) and non-competition venues, the IOC has assessed Sochi as a “very good concept” with “strong legacy opportunities”, since an adequate post-use could be proven. The Non-OCOG budget (as stated in the bid accounted for an infrastructure investment of approx. US $ 9 bn. The Games Concepts is strongly related to several other topics that need to be provided to the IOC, such as competition and non-competition venues, Olympic Village and of course the vision form the heart of each Olympic bid strongly indicating the general concept.

Munich 2018: The compact two-park concept forms the basis for sustainable Games and is particularly notable for the use of existing sports venues’ infrastructure in the Ice and Snow Park. The ice competitions would have been held in the Munich Ice Park, the snow competitions in the GarmischPartenkirchen Snow Park. The concept had been complimented by the existing Königssee Sliding Centre for the Bobsleigh, Luge and Skeleton races. Garmisch-Partenkirchen is within a distance of 94 km (65 min.), Schönau am Königssee within a distance of 164 km (110 min.) from the Ice Cluster. The two Olympic Villages together with the athletes accommodation for Luge, Bobsleigh and Skeleton have a total capacity of 6,550 beds.

Munich 2018 - Map B (Source: Candidature File)

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

Around the competition venue cluster a total of 68,400 rooms are available. Approximately 38,000 of these are hotel rooms classified in the three- to five-star category, and approximately 4,000 hotel rooms are classified as two-star. Media Villages for Munich 2018 would have served for a total of 5,950 media representatives.

Annecy 2018: Annecyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s hosting concept includes two zones: Annecy and Chamonix/ Mont Blanc, as well as an existing stand-alone venue at La Plagne. A feature of the concept is that the Annecy and Chamonix zones would both host a combination of snow and ice sports, allowing visitors to more easily attend multiple competitions within each zone. Charmonix/ Mont Blanc is within a distance of 100 km from Annecy, La Clusaz/ Le Grand Bornand is is within a distance of 40 km and La Plagne within a distance of 150 km. The Annecy zone would have included 5 competition venues (two snow and three ice) as well as an Olympic Village, the IBC/MPC, a media village, IOC hotels and the venue for the Opening and Closing Ceremonies and medals presentation. The La Clusaz/Le Grand Bornand zone would have included three venues for cross-country skiing, ski jumping, Nordic combined and biathlon. The Chamonix/Mont Blanc zone would have included four competition venues (two snow and two ice).

Annecy 2018 - Map B (Source: Candidature File)

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

PyeongChang 2018: The concept includes two zones, the Alpensia zone in PyeongChang and the Coastal zone in Gangneung. The travel time between the two zones would be approximately 20 minutes. The Alpensia zone, with competition venues for the sliding and snow events, places the heart of the Games in the mountains at the newly-constructed Alpensia resort. The zone will include eight competition venues for biathlon, cross country, ski jumping and the sliding centre (luge, bobsleigh, and skeleton), all in close proximity to the Olympic Village. Also in the zone, and within 30 minutes of the Olympic Village, is the freestyle/ snowboard cluster at Bokwang Phoenix Park, and the alpine speed and technical events at Jugbong and YongPyong respectively. The Alpensia zone will also include the venue for the Opening and Closing Ceremonies (ski jumping arena), a medal plaza, the IBC/ MPC, the Alpensia Media Village and IOC hotels.

PyeongChang 2018 - Map B

IOC Evaluation After negative experiences in the past (e.g. Torino 2006) a tendency of the IOC to more compact concepts with shorter travel times within certain clusters/ zones could be observed. Nevertheless, a compact concept can only be suggested, if a smooth transport operation can be guaranteed. Especially to (and in) the mountain regions a comprehensive proof will be required. Furthermore, it could be seen that the IOC tries to avoid â&#x20AC;&#x153;white elephantsâ&#x20AC;?. It is therefore suggested to develop concepts also heavily focusing on legacy and post-use operations. Investments should therefore be part of a long-term vision for the region.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

2.2 Competition Venues IOC Requirements Sports

Seating (Standing)

No. of Competition Venues

3,000

10,000

6,000

12,000

Curling Ice Hockey 1 Ice Hockey 2 Figure Skating/ Short Track Speed Skating

6,000

Indoor Venues

1 min. 5

Alpine Skiing Biathlon

8,000 (10,000)

5-7,000 (10-15,000)

Bobsleigh/Skeleton

1,000 (10,000)

(shared with Luge ) 1

Cross Country Skiing

3,000 (10,000)

(shared with Nord. Combined) 1

Freestyle

4,000 (10,000)

Luge

1,000 (10,000)

(shared with Bobsleigh, Skeleton)

(shared with Cross C., Ski Jump.)

Snowboard

4,000 (10-15,000)

Ski Jumping

3,000 (10-15,000)

(shared with Nord. Combined) 1

Nord. Combined

outdoor Venues

min. 8

Source: IOC Technical Manuals

IOC Requirements (on Training Venues) Sports

Seating (Standing)

No. of Training Venues

Ice Hockey

no requirements

Figure Skating/ Short Track

no requirements

Indoor training Venues outdoor training Venues

min. 3 no requirement

no requirement

Source: IOC Technical Manuals

Benchmarks Sochi 2014: The bid for Sochi 2014 proposed a total of 11 competition venues, of which 4 (36 %) were listed in the Candidature File as existing. Still, based on the large amount of construction involved, the IOC considered all of these venues as new construction. Seven venues will be built irrespective of the 2014 Olympic Winter Games (sliding centre, an ice hockey arena, speed skating oval, cross-country / biathlon, alpine skiing, freestyle skiing and snowboard).

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

Munich 2018: Based on a long winter sport tradition and the general concept of using the former Olympic Park of the Games 1972, Munich proposed to use a high amount of eight (62 %) existing venues. Only two (15 %) of the additional required venues would have been built new (part of existing plans). Three (23 %) more venues would have been built temporarily for the period of the Games. Annecy 2018: Annecy can as well draw on many existing venues. The Games Plan envisioned to use seven (54 %) existing venues, five (38 %) new permanent venues and one (8 %) temporary venue. Pyeong Chang 2018: PyeongChang proposed a total of 13 competition venues in the bid. Seven (54 %) existing venues, five (38 %) new permanent venues and one (8 %) temporary venue. According to the IOC Evaluation Commission Report, PyeongChang has made a strong commitment to winter sport through the construction of the crosscountry skiing and biathlon venues within the Alpensia Resort. The ski jumping venue was delivered in 2009. The IOC additionally stated that the plan to further improve two existing venues (curling and snowboard) and to construct five new permanent venues (sliding sports, speed skating, ice hockey 2, figure skating/short track speed skating and Alpine speed skiing) would assist in further developing a winter sports legacy in Korea beyond the sports traditionally practised in Korea and in Asia.

2.3 Non-Competition Venues IOC Requirements Facility

capacity/ ﬂoor space

Olympic Village(s)

4,500-6,500 beds*

* The IOC requires 4,500 rooms in the Olympic Village without taking more than one venue zone into consideration. In case of more than one zone/ competition venue zone additional beds have to be provided for the athletes. The shown max. number is based on own estimates.

Facility

capacity/ ﬂoor space

International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

40,000 m²

Main Press Centre (MPC)

25,000 m²

Sub Media Centre (SMC)

20,000-30,000 m²*

Media Accommodation

10,475 rooms**

* There is no specification of SMC requirements by the IOC. The given floor space is a rough estimate based on experience and does depend upon the specific concept/ competition venue zoning. ** The given number represents the total media accommodation. How many of these will be required in each zone depends upon the specific concept. Source: IOC Technical Manuals

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

Benchmarks Sochi 2014: For the Games in Sochi two Olympic villages â&#x20AC;&#x201C; about 62km apart, are planned. One is located in the new Sochi Olympic Park for ice sport athletes and one in the Krasnaya Polyana mountain zone. Most athletes will reach their competition venue within 16 minutes at Games time; both villages will be newly constructed as four-star resort hotels and will be used as tourist resort accommodation after the Games. Munich 2018: Munich designed a Games Plan with two different Villages, an Olympic and a Snow Village. 80% of competition venues would have been reached within 5 minutes. The Olympic Village was designed as a permanent energy-plus housing project, close to the 1972 Olympic Park. The Snow Village was designed permanent as well as modular. The municipalities and the OCOG would have developed the villages. Annecy 2018: Annecy planned a two village concept, with a village in Annecy and in Chamonix. The post-use was designed to be residential units and eco-neighbourhoods, thereof more than 50% were destined to be social housing after the Games. The development would have been undertaken by the municipalities and an Olympic Development Society with participation by the OCOG. PyeongChang 2018: In PyeongChang there will be two villages for the athletes, one in the Alpensia and one in the coastal cluster, about 31 km apart. 90 % of athletes can reach their competition venues within 10 minutes. The development is designed sustainably and the post-use is a housing and tourist resort. Both villages will be developed privately and leased back by POCOG.

2.4 Transport IOC Requirements The IOC has developed in its requirements a far-reaching vision of sustainable transport development and calls for a sustainable Olympic legacy for the mobility conditions of the host region. Specific requirements are imposed on the transport of the Olympic Family whose circulation spaces are to be separated from those of other participating groups by so called Olympic lanes that connect all competition and non-competition venues and are to be provided for all accredited and dedicated vehicles as well as for spectator shuttle buses. It is expected that accredited guests (athletes, team officials, IOC and NOC deputies, marketing partners and sponsors, media representatives, etc.) are provided with separate vehicles with free access to the sports venues. Spectator parking is not to be provided at the venues. The transportation of the volunteers will be handled to a large extend by public transport.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

Benchmarks

Olympic Village [km] [min] 2014

Olympic Village Snow Village Ice Cluster Venues Snow Cluster Venues Main Media Centre

63 1 55 3

62 3 60 3

Snow Village [km] [min] 2014 63

63 12 63

62 13 62

Ice Cluster Venues [km] [min] 2014 1 63

3 62

57 0,5

61 3

Snow Cluster Venues [km] [min] 2014 55 12 57

60 13 61

Main Media Centre [km] [min] 2014 3 63 0,5 58

3 62 3 57

Comparison of travel times (Sochi 2014)* Olympic Village [km] [min] 2018

Olympic Village Snow Village Ice Cluster Venues Snow Cluster Venues Main Media Centre

31 2 31 34

20 5 20 20

Snow Village [km] [min] 2018 31

31 1,5 1,5

20 5 5

Ice Cluster Venues [km] [min] 2018 2 31

5 20

31 36

20 25

Snow Cluster Venues [km] [min] 2018 31 1,5 31

20 5 20

Main Media Centre [km] [min] 2018 34 1,5 36 1

20 5 25 5

Comparison of travel times (Pyeong Chang 2018)*

Olympic Village Snow Village Ice Cluster Venues Snow Cluster Venues Sliding Centre Main Media Centre

Olympic Village [km] [min] 2018

Snow Village [km] [min] 2018 93

93 5 93 171 19

95 5 196 104

70 5 160 75

65 5 65 125 20

Ice Cluster Venues [km] [min] 2018 5 95

5 70

95 164 16

65 115 15

Snow Cluster Venues [km] [min] 2018 93 5 95

65 5 65

196 104

160 75

Main Media Centre [km] [min] 2018 19 104 16 104 165

20 75 15 75 115

Comparison of travel times (Munich 2018)*

*Sources: IOC 2018 Evaluation Commission Report / XXIII Olympic Winter Games, IOC 2014 Evaluation Commission Report / XXII Olympic Winter Games

2.5 Accommodation The IOC requires candidate cities to deliver a comprehensive survey of all the expected accommodation facilities available. It is predefined in what distance to the venues the accommodation facilities have to be located. All rooms in a 50-km radius around the Olympic Park (Village) and all rooms in a 10-km radius around venue zones may be counted.

IOC Requirements Client Group

Rooms

Quality (Stars)

IOC

950

4 to 5

IFs

685

2 to 5

NOC

1,820

2 to 5

Host OCOG

4,820

2 to 5

200

3 to 5

4,350

3 to 5

10,475

2.5 to 5

Future OCOG Marketing Partner Media totAL

23,300

Source: Technical Manual on Accommodation, 5th Update Cycle â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Post Vancouver Winter Games

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

Planned hotels and media accommodations will also be taken into account, however, a feasibility factor is included in their calculation, and this can lead to small devaluations. Rooms in 2-star hotels are only taken into account by 50%. To accommodate the Olympic Family at least 23,300 rooms in 2 to 5-star hotels are required. Existing room capacities of +50,000 and thus, more than doubling the number of required rooms led to high scores in the 2018 IOC evaluation. In the case of Lviv 2022, alternative accommodation such as Condominiums and Apartments, School and University Dormitories, Youth, Church and Military Camps and also Mobile or Temporary Accommodation has to be considered. For 2022, potentially increasing demand in and around the outdoor venues is to be expected. The capacities of newly planned hotels have to be realistic. Apart form the accommodation for the spectators, the accommodation of the IOC, the Olympic Family and the media representatives is of particular importance. The IOC hotel, with a capacity of approximately 1,000 rooms in the 4 to 5 star categories, has to be in a prime location and with good accessibility to the venues.

Number of Rooms Sochi 2014 and 2018 Candidate Cities

Existing Rooms within 50 km

Sochi

Munich

Annecy

PyeongChang

94,000 (77% in

53,000

56,000

76,000

24,600

25,500

5,950 (2 to 3

2,760 (2 to 3

10,500 (4 to 5

Star)

“compact and

“spread of ac-

“very compact

2 star properties)

radius Guaranteed (2 to

57,300 (50% to

5 Star)

be built)

Media Village

None

IOC Evaluation

“relies heavily on renovation

carried out with

commodation

and competi-

and construc-

regard to differ-

and the number

tive rates, low

tion, but feasi-

ent locations,

of establish-

number of fa-

ble, if plans are

rates on the high

ments involved

cilities would

implemented”

side”

would create

facilitate Games

operational

operations”

and financial challenges” Source: IOC 2018 Evaluation Commission Report / XXIII Olympic Winter Games, IOC 2014 Evaluation Commission Report / XXII Olympic Winter Games

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

2.6 Finance USD MM

Sochi

Munich

Annecy

PyeongChang

total Bid Budget

27.5

42.5

21.0

31.5

Applicant Phase

10.0

19.7

7.0

6.0

Candidature Phase

17.5

22.7

14.0

25.5

oCoG Budget

1,500

1,850

1,530

Non-oCoG Budget

(5 % contin-

(10 % contin-

(0 % contin-

gency reserve)

1,860

3,300

6,430

8,800

Source: IOC 2018 Evaluation Commission Report / XXIII Olympic Winter Games, IOC 2014 Evaluation Commission Report / XXII Olympic Winter Games

The above shown table provides the official budgets of the bidders as listed in the bid documents. It has to be emphasized that - by experience - the actual (unofficial) budgets have been much higher. Especially the shown bid budgets are estimated to be two to three times higher.

2.7 IOC Evaluation In the Working Group Report, the IOC provides insight in the evaluation of the Applicant City concepts. A grade (on a scale of 0 to 10) is given to each Mini Bid Book criteria, comprising a minimum and maximum number. The more uncertain a criterionâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s grade, the wider the span between the minimum and maximum grade. The following charts of the before described bidders/ criteria provide an overview of how the IOC technically evaluated the bid concepts. The higher the grade the more positive the approaches have been rated, the wider the span the more uncertainty of implementation has been seen by the IOC Working Group. Sochi 2014 Crieria

General Infrastructure Sports Venues Olympic Village(s) Accommodation Transport Concept Overall Concept

Source: XXII Olympic Winter Games in 2014, Report by the IOC Candidature Acceptance Working Group to the IOC Executive Board (own illustration)

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

M端nchen 2018 Crieria

General Infrastructure Sports Venues Olympic Village(s) Accommodation Transport Concept Overall Concept

Source: XXIII Olympic Winter Games 2018 Working Group Report (own illustration)

Annecy 2018 Crieria

General Infrastructure Sports Venues Olympic Village(s) Accommodation Transport Concept Overall Concept

Source: XXIII Olympic Winter Games 2018 Working Group Report (own illustration)

PyeongChang 2018 Crieria

General Infrastructure Sports Venues Olympic Village(s) Accommodation Transport Concept Overall Concept

Source: XXIII Olympic Winter Games 2018 Working Group Report (own illustration)

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

3. Games Concept

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

3. Games Concept Lviv’s concept for a potential bid to host Olympic Winter Games could be designed around two majors zones: The “Lviv Ice Zone” and approx. 130 km south from Lviv the “Tysovets Snow Zone”. The concept would be complemented by the Volovets Alpine Arena, approx. 155 km south of Lviv. The zoning would allow for adequate Games operations and would limit travel times to a possible minimum, taking into consideration that the remote location of the necessarely required venue in Volovets asks for a fast track rail and road connection.

3.1 Venue Zones The Lviv Ice Zone could accommodate all venues for ice-sports. The area around the newly built Lviv Arena is suitable to serve as a most compact Olympic Park. Three new halls for ice hockey (1), figure skating/ short track and speed skating would be required in the Olympic Park whereas the Curling events could be held in one of the exhibition halls of the trade fair which is envisaged irrespective of the Games. Four of the five trade fair halls together with a new office building could serve as a Main Media Centre during Games-time. An Olympic Village with 4,000 beds as well as a Media Village with 6,500 rooms for media representatives could cater for the demand in adequate residential and social housing in the city. A sliding centre is currently in the process of further evaluation by the Sports Federation and an arena for ice hockey (2) is already projected irrespective of the Games and are located within the urban context. The freestyle aerials events could be held temporarily in the existing Ukraina Stadium in the vicinity of the Olympic Park. Three training ice-rinks could be located in different areas of the city, creating a public-sports legacy for both, universities and the general community in the post-use. The existing winter sports training centre in Tysovets is proposed to become the Snow Zone and could host all nordic disciplines, ski jumping as well as the freestyle and snowboard competitions. To accommodate the athletes and team officials, a hotel resort with about 2,000 beds would have to be developed plus accommodation for the media. Post Games Tysovets could serve as a centre of excellence for nordic sports and for regional leisure activities. As the altitude in Tysovets does not meet the technical requirements for the ski alpine disciplines, an additional venue and athletes‘ accommodation is proposded in the more distant Volovets. However, as the Borzhava region is planned to be developed for skiing tourism irrespective of the bid, the Volovets Alpine Arena could add another legacy component to the overall concept.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

Map B: Venue Locations

Lvi L viiv

Lviv-Ice Zone

Str t yi y T ska Tru s vet ets et s

Tysove Tys ov ts ove s Skole Sko S le

S vsk Sla vske e

Tysovets-Snow Zone

Vol o ove ol o ts ov

Volovets Alpine Arena

Alpine Skiing

Ice Hockey

Airport

Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required

Biathlon

Luge

Athletes' Accomodation

Existing infrastructure, permanent works required

Bobsleigh

Nordic Combined

International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Cross-Country Skiing

Short Track Speed Skating

Main Hotel Area

Curling

Skeleton

Main Press Centre (MPC)

Figure Skating

Ski Jumping

Medal Ceremonies

Freestyle (Aerials)

Snowboard (SBX)

Media Village

Freestyle (Moguls)

Snowboard (PGS)

Opening & Closing Ceremonies

Freestyle (Ski-Halfpipe)

Snowboard (Halfpipe)

Olympic Family Hotel

Freestyle (Slopestyle)

Snowboard (Slopestyle)

Olympic Village

Freestyle (Ski Cross)

Speed Skating

Railway Station

Planned permanent infrastructure (irrespective of the Games) Additional permanent infrastructure (Games dependent) Temporary venues required for the Olympic Winter Games 0

10 km

50 km

Snow Park Media Centre

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

Existing Venues - Permanent Works Required Gross seating

Implementation

Cost

Source of

capacity*

time

(MM EUR)**

finance

3,000 (10,000)

2014-18

public

Biathlon

5,000 (10,000)

2012-16

public

Cross Country Skiing, Nordic Combined

3,000 (10,000)

Freestyle (Moguls)

4,000 (10,000)

2019-20

public

Competition Venue

Olympic Sport(s)/ Disciplines

Ski Jumping Centre

Ski Jumping, Nordic Combined

Nordic Centre

Ski Jumping Centre

Planned Permanent Venues (irrespective of the Olympic Games) Gross seating

Implementation

Cost

Source of

capacity*

time

(MM EUR)**

finance

Ice Hockey 2

6,000

2012-15

public

Lviv Trade Fair

Curling

3,000

2014-17

public

Volovets Alpine Arena

Alpin Skiing

8,000 (10,000)

2012-18

200

public

Competition Venue

Olympic Sport(s)/ Disciplines

Lviv Ice Hockey Arena

Additional Permanent Venues (Games dependent) Gross seating

Implementation

Cost

Source of

capacity*

time

(MM EUR)**

finance

12,000

2017-20

public

Bobsleigh, Luge, Skeleton

1,000 (10,000)

2015-20

150

public

Snowboard (SBX), Freestyle (Ski Cross)

4,000 (10,000)

2019-20

public

Snowboard (Slopestyle), Freestyle (Slopestyle)

4,000 (10,000)

Snowboard (PGS)

4,000 (10,000)

Competition Venue

Olympic Sport(s)/ Disciplines

Lviv Mulit-Purpose Arena

Figure Skating, Short Track

Sliding Centre Board and Ski Arena

Temporary Venues Required for the Olympic Winter Games Competition Venue

Olympic Sport(s)/ Disciplines

Lviv Speed Skating Oval

Speed Skating

Lviv Ice Hockey Rink

Ice Hockey 1

Gross seating

Implementation

Cost

source of

capacity*

time

(MM EUR)**

finance

6,000

2020-21

public

10,000

2020-21

public

Ukraina Stadium

Freestyle (Aerials)

10,000 (4,000)

2020-21

public

Board and Ski Arena

Snowboard (Half-pipe), Freestyle (Ski-Half-pipe)

4,000 (10,000)

2020-21

public

* Additional standing places in parenthesis ** All costs excl. Overlay Cost in EUR 2012

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

3.2 Major Challenges As indicated, a huge amount of infrastructure will be required to host the Olympic Winter Games. Currently Lviv shows a big deficit in competition venues, non-competition venues (e.g. the Olympic Village or the International Broadcast Centre), as well as supplementary infrastructures (e.g transport links and accommodation). Even existing venues like in the Tysovets-Snow Zone do not have the required standard and will call for major upgrades. To reach an international competitive level, a high amount of investments will therefore be necessary. Having a huge amount of new and tailor-made infrastructures has the positive effect of most up-to-date technical framework conditions for the Games on the one hand, but also bears the risk of creating infrastructures without an adequate post-use, the so called â&#x20AC;&#x153;White Elephantsâ&#x20AC;?, on the other hand. Especially in the last years it has been observed that the IOC as well as the international sports family has set a focus on sustainable developments, creating a legacy for the time after the Games. Aside from the technical tasks, one of the major challenges of the Lviv 2022 concepts will therefore be the alignment of the Olympic Winter Games concept with the long-term strategy of the city, the region and the nation. This includes in the smaller scale the evaluation of plausible seating capacities (within the limits of the IOC ranges) or the decision, if to built a permanent or a temporary venue, and in a larger scale the decision which areas to select for future developments (incl. all associated aspects like transport links, hotels, etc.). Based on the given information and the limited four weeks time period, the Games Concept already takes general future developments (e.g. tourism developments in Borzhava/ Volovets, sports centre of excellence in Tysovets, trade fair development in Lviv, etc.) into consideration. Beyond that, it is recommended to frame strategic goals and objectives on a political level and imbed it into an overall vision for Lviv and the related Carpathian Mountains region.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

4. Master Plan - Lviv Ice Zone

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

4. Master Plan - Lviv Ice Zone 4.1 Overview 5 km s radiu

Lviv-Olympic Park Lviv Ice Zone - Venue Locations Existing infrastructure, Alpine Skiing Ice Hockey Airport The proposed Lviv Ice Zone would be a compact Games-Zone comprising of theworks following no permanent required competiBiathlon Luge tion and non-competition venues: Bobsleigh

Nordic Combined

Athletes' Accomodation

Existing infrastructure, permanent works required

International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Planned permanent infrastructure

> Cross-Country The majority of the “Ice Events” competition precinctof of Olympic Park the the Games) Skiing Short Track Speed Skating Main Hotel Area venues within the(irrespective Additional > Curling The ice hockey (2) close to the Olympic Park in a multi-purpose hall permanent infrastructure Skeleton Main Press Centre (MPC) (Games dependent)

> Figure TheSkating freestyle-aerials venue and the Medal sliding centre as additionalTemporary “City Venues” Ski Jumping Ceremonies venues required

for the Olympic Winter Games

> Freestyle The (Aerials) InternationalSnowboard Broadcasting Centre and Main Press Centre (MPC) (SBX) Media (IBC) Village

Snowboard (PGS)4,000 beds Opening > Freestyle The (Moguls) Olympic Village with and& Closing the Ceremonies Media Village with 6,500 rooms Snowboard (Halfpipe) 1,000 rooms Olympic Family Hotel > Freestyle The (Ski-Halfpipe) IOC Hotel with approx. (Slopestyle) Snowboard (Slopestyle) Olympic Village > Freestyle Three training sites providing a positive legacy for the communities post-Games Freestyle (Ski Cross)

ProProjekt

AS&P

Speed Skating

Railway Station

Training Site

Snow Park Media Centre

April 2012

4.2 Olympic Park ATHLETES/ TEAMS/ OFFICIALS A0 Entry A1 Field of Play A2 Training Area E0

A3 Areas for designated Users

A4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

A0 C2

OLYMPIC FAMILY

B0 Entry

B1 Areas for designated Users

B3 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

SPECTATORS C0 Entry D0

C1 Spectator Plaza/ Services C2 Load Zone

C3 Coach Parking

MEDIA 1

D0 Entry

D1 Media Area, Broadcasting Area

D2 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

B0 A0

OPERATIONS

E0 Entry

D2 E1 Operational Area A0 D0 E0

E2 Flower Ceremony E4

E3 Ski Lift E5

C3 C3

E4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area E5 F Olympic Overlay Structures

E5 G Grandstands

E5 H Standing Positions E5 I Public Transport Stop

Perimeter Fence O-Park Railway

1,500

s diu m ra

Transport Route Pedestrian Route

Airport

Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required

Luge

Athletes' Accomodation

Existing infrastructure, permanent works required

Nordic Combined

International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Cross-Country Skiing

Short Track Speed Skating

Main Hotel Area

Curling

Skeleton

Main Press Centre (MPC)

Figure Skating

Ski Jumping

Medal Ceremonies

Freestyle (Aerials)

Snowboard (SBX)

Media Village

Freestyle (Moguls)

Snowboard (PGS)

Opening & Closing Ceremonies

Freestyle (Ski-Halfpipe)

Snowboard (Halfpipe)

Olympic Family Hotel

Freestyle (Slopestyle)

Snowboard (Slopestyle)

Olympic Village

Freestyle (Ski Cross)

Speed Skating

Alpine Skiing

Ice Hockey

Biathlon Bobsleigh

Planned permanent infrastructure (irrespective of the Games) Additional permanent infrastructure (Games dependent) Temporary venues required for the Olympic Winter Games 0 100 m

500 m

1000 m

Railway Station Snow Park Media Centre

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

The Lviv Olympic Park is proposed to be in the southern part of the city, near the intersection of the cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s ring road and Stryiska Street which leads to the city centre. The cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s ring road is part of the route E40 that connects Wroclaw, Lviv, Kyiv, and Kharkiv. The International Airport is located northwest of the Olympic Park, which would combine all Ice Events except for the smaller ice hockey 2 Arena which is planned north-east of the Olympic Park irrespective of the Games. The Olympic Park could be designed around the existing Arena Lviv. A compact Olympic Park as suggested for a potential bid to host the Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games offers various advantageous compared to a decentralized concept. The area offers sufficient space, offers a good accessibility and is well connected to the city centre and to the Tysovets Snow Zone and the Volovets Alpine Arena in the south. It is essential from an operational point of view to limit travel times and share structures which also underlines the necessity for an agglomeration of venues. Due to the Olympic Park being situated in walking distance to the Olympic Village, the IBC/ MPC and the Media accommodation, it offers excellent conditions for all user groups. Two of the three new venues could be planned temporarily in order to avoid over-capacities in the post-use. With a new trade fair/ Convention Centre next to the Arena Lviv plus a modern multifunctional area, the Olympic Park will be of local and national asset and could work on becoming an international competitive location for the holding of conventions, fairs and other events.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

4.2.1 Opening and Closing Ceremony Arena Lviv Status

Existing

Capacity

34,915

Altitude

335 m

Construction Costs

na.

Completion Date

2011

Legacy

Football Stadium

Remarks The Arena Lviv which was newly built for the UEFA Euro 2012 has a total seating capacity of almost 35,000 spectators. This venue could host the Opening & Closing Ceremony. The stadium marks the centre of the Olympic Park and could meet all requirements for hosting the prestigious ceremonies. ATHLETES/ TEAMS/ OFFICIALS ATHLETES/ A0 Entry TEAMS/ OFFICIALS A0 A1 Field Entry

IBC-Hotel

of Play

A1 A2 Field of Play Area Training A2 A3 Training AreasArea for designated E0

A3 A4 Areas for Zone designated Users Load and/ or Parking

A4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

B0 A0

Main Press Centre

OLYMPIC FAMILY B0 Entry

B0 Entry

B1 Areas for designated Users

Area

OLYMPIC FAMILY

Users

B3 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

SPECTATORS SPECTATORS

Curling

C0 Entry C0 Entry

C1 Spectator Plaza/ Services

C2 Load Zone

E0 F

C3 Coach Parking

E0 C0

IBC

D0 Entry

G D4

Media Area, Broadcasting D1 D1 Media Area, Broadcasting Area Area

IBC

Load Zone or Parking D2 D2 Load Zone and/and/ or Parking Area Area

B0 A0

MEDIA

D0 Entry

OPERATIONS OPERATIONS Entry E0 E0 Entry

D2 E1 E1 Operational AreaArea Operational A0 D0 E0

E2 E4 E4 Flower Ceremony E2 Flower Ceremony

C0 B0

C0C0

E1 C3

G A0

IBC

E5 F Olympic Overlay Structures

E5 G Grandstands

E0 F

Lift

E4 E4 Load Zone and/and/ or Parking Area Area Load Zone or Parking

E5 H Standing Positions

E3 E5 E5 Ski Ski Lift E3

IBC

E5 H Standing Positions

E5 I Public Transport Stop

Perimeter Fence O-Park

Secure Perimeter Fence

Railway

Figure Skating/ Short Track Alpine Skiing

Ice Hockey

1,500

d m ra

ius

Transport Route Pedestrian Route

Pedestrian Route Airport

Alpine Skiing Biathlon

Ice Hockey Luge

Athletes' Accomodation

Biathlon Bobsleigh

Luge Nordic Combined

Athletes' Accomodation International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Bobsleigh Cross-Country Skiing

Nordic Combined Short Track Speed Skating

Main Hotel Area

Cross-Country Skiing Short Track Speed Skating ProProjekt Curling AS&P April 2012 Skeleton

Railway Transport Route

Airport

Existing infrastructure, noExisting permanent works required infrastructure,

no permanent works required

Existing infrastructure, permanent required Existing works infrastructure,

International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

permanent worksinfrastructure required Planned permanent (irrespective of the Games)

Main Hotel Area

(irrespective of theinfrastructure Games) 3 9 96 Additional permanent (Games dependent)

Main Press Centre (MPC)

(Games venues dependent) Temporary required for the Olympic Winter Games

Main Press Centre (MPC)

Curling Figure Skating

Skeleton Ski Jumping

Medal Ceremonies

Figure Skating Freestyle (Aerials)

Ski Jumping (SBX) Snowboard

MedalVillage Ceremonies Media

Planned permanent infrastructure

Additional permanent infrastructure Temporary venues required for the Olympic Winter Games

4.2.2 Figure Skating, Short Track Lviv Multi-Purpose Arena Status

New

Capacity

12,000

Altitude

335 m

Construction Costs

EUR 80 MM

Implementation Time

2017-2020

Legacy

Multi-purpose arena

Remarks A 12,000-seat permanent Ice Arena could to be located in the southern part of the Olympic Park, adjoining the Arena Lviv. The figure skating/ short track arena would have to provide a state-of-the-art setting in full compliance with all international guidelines for figure skating and short track. After the Games the Arena could serve as multi-functional venue for concerts, sports and cultural performances. In conjunction with the trade fair and the Arena Lviv, the multifunctional Arena could be of regional and national asset and could draw major events and performances. In the following it will need to be studied in more detail if the capacity of the stadium should remain 12,000 after the Games or if it would have to be reduced to a certain extent. IBC

E0 B0 Opening & Closing Ceremony A0

A4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

B0 Entry

IBC

F A3 D2

ATHLETES/ TEAMS/ OFFICIALS

A1 Field of Play A0 Entry A2 Training Area A1 Field of Play A3 Areas for designated Users A2 Training Area A4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

OLYMPIC FAMILY

A0 Entry

A3 Areas for designated Users

ATHLETES/ TEAMS/ OFFICIALS

OLYMPIC FAMILY B1 Areas for designated Users

B0 Entry B3 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area B1 Areas for designated Users

SPECTATORS Zone and/ or Parking Area

B3 Load C0 Entry

SPECTATORS

B0 A0

C1 Spectator Plaza/ Services

Entry C2C0 Load Zone

C0 A0

Spectator Plaza/ C3C1 Coach Parking C2 MEDIA Load Zone

C1 1

Coach D0C3 Entry

D0 E0

Parking

MEDIA D1 Media Area, Broadcasting Area D2D0 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area Entry

B0 A0

Services

D1 OPERATIONS Media Area, Broadcasting Area

Load E0D2 Entry

Zone and/ or Parking Area

Ice Hockey 1

E1 Operational Area OPERATIONS A0 D0 E0

E4 Flower Ceremony E2 E0 Entry

A0 B0 A0

E5 Ski Lift E3 E1 Operational

Area

E4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area E2 Flower Ceremony E4 E5 F Olympic Overlay Structures E3 Ski Lift E5 E5 G Grandstands E4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area E5 H Standing Positions E5 F Olympic Overlay Structures E5 I Public Transport Stop E5 G Grandstands

B0 C0

Perimeter Fence O-Park

E5 H Standing Positions

1,500

d m ra

ius

Railway E5 I Public Transport Stop Transport Route Secure Perimeter Fence Pedestrian Route

Railway Alpine Skiing

Ice Hockey

Airport

Existing infrastructure, no permanent worksTransport requiredRoute

Biathlon

Luge

Athletes' Accomodation

Existing infrastructure, permanent works required

Bobsleigh Alpine Skiing Cross-Country Skiing

Nordic Combined Ice Hockey Short Track Speed Skating

International Broadcast Centre (IBC) Airport Main Hotel Area

Existingpermanent infrastructure, Planned infrastructure no permanent works required (irrespective of the Games)

Biathlon

Luge

Athletes' Accomodation Main Press Centre (MPC)

Existing infrastructure, Additional permanent infrastructure 4 0 96 (Games dependent) permanent works required

Bobsleigh Figure Skating

Nordic Combined Ski Jumping

International Broadcast Centre (IBC) Medal Ceremonies

Cross-Country Skiing Freestyle (Aerials)

Short Track Speed Skating Snowboard (SBX)

Main Hotel Area Media Village

ProProjekt Curling AS&P

April 2012 Skeleton

Temporary venues required Planned permanent infrastructure for the OlympicofWinter Games (irrespective the Games)

4.2.3 Ice Hockey 1 Lviv Ice Hockey Rink Status

New

Capacity

10,000

Altitude

335 m

Construction Costs

EUR 60 MM

Implementation Time

2020-2021

Legacy

Temporary

Remarks Any bidding city needs to provide two ice hockey arenas due to the high number of competitions. Parts of the ice hockey tournament could be staged in a new 10,000 seat ice hockey arena in the Olympic Park. The ice hockey 1 arena is planned temporarily as the combination of the Arena Lviv and the new 12,000-seat ice arena (figure skating & short track) appears to be sufficient to meet the medium-term demand. After the Games, the space of the demounted arena would be available for future development of the Olympic Park. The Arena is currently planned on the southern border of the Olympic Park. IBC

Opening// Closing Ceremony

ATHLETES/ TEAMS/ OFFICIALS A0 Entry

ATHLETES/ TEAMS/ OFFICIALS A1 Field of Play

A0 Entry

A2 Training Area

A1 Field of Play

A3 Areas A2 Training Area E0 B0 A0

IBC

A4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

OLYMPIC FAMILY

OLYMPIC FAMILY B0 Entry

Fig Figure gure e Skating/ C0 Short Sho ort Track Track

for designated Users

A4 for Load Zone and/ or Parking Area A3 Areas designated Users

B0 Entry B1

Areas for designated Users

B1 Areas for designated Users

B3 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

SPECTATORS SPECTATORS C0 Entry C0 Entry

C1 Spectator Plaza/ Services

C2 Load Zone

C3 Coach Parking

D0 D0 Entry

C1 C0 2 3

C0 E0

B0 A0

Area

D2Zone D2 Load Load Zone and/ orArea Parking and/ or Parking

Area

E0 Entry E0

Entry

E1 Operational Area

A0 D0 E0

A3 A4

Entry

OPERATIONS OPERATIONS

B3 B1

MEDIA

D1 Area, Media Area, Broadcasting D1 Media Broadcasting Area

F D1

MEDIA

E2 Flower Ceremony E4

C3 C3

E3 Ski Lift E5

E4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

E2 Flower Ceremony E4

E3 Ski Lift E5

E4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area E5 F Olympic Overlay Structures

E5 F Olympic Overlay Structures

E5 G Grandstands

E5 H Standing Positions

E5 G Grandstands E5 H Standing Positions

E5 I Public Transport Stop

Perimeter Fence O-Park

Railway Secure Perimeter Fence

1,500

d m ra

ius

TransportRailway Route Pedestrian Route Route Transport

Pedestrian Route

Ice Hockey

Airport

Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required

Biathlon Alpine Skiing

Luge Ice Hockey

Athletes' Accomodation Airport

Existing infrastructure, Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required permanent works required

Bobsleigh Biathlon

Nordic Combined

International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Short Track Speed Skating

Main Hotel Area

Alpine Skiing

Luge

Cross-Country Skiing

Bobsleigh

ProProjekt Curling AS&P

April 2012 Skeleton

Cross-Country Skiing Figure Skating

Curling Freestyle (Aerials)

Nordic Combined

Short Track Speed Skating

Ski Jumping

Skeleton Snowboard (SBX)

Athletes' Accomodation

International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Main Press Centre (MPC)

Main Hotel Area

Medal Ceremonies

Main Press Centre (MPC) Media Village

Existing infrastructure, Planned permanent infrastructure permanent required (irrespective of the works Games) Additional permanent infrastructure Planned permanent infrastructure 4 1 96 (Games dependent)of the Games) (irrespective Temporary venues required infrastructure Additional permanent for the(Games Olympic dependent) Winter Games

4.2.4 Speed Skating Lviv Speed Skating Oval Status

New

Capacity

6,000

Altitude

335 m

Construction Costs

EUR 60 MM

Implementation Time

2020-2021

Legacy

Temporary

Remarks A new speed skating oval could be constructed in the western part of the Olympic Park - the current location of the horse race training track. A 6,000-seat demountable arena is currently proposed to become a temporary structure as long as there is no reasonable post-use. It has to be clarified in the following under which conditions the oval could be rented for the Games period. Post Games, the technical elements that are not part of a rental business could be dismantled and all of its reusable components could be distributed/ sold to interested parties. However it has to be determined if the installation of a permanent structure might be a reasonable option as well. This decision will need to be based on long-term perspectives of the Sports Federations to install a centre of excellence for speed skating in Lviv and the committment of the stakeholders to cover the expenditures of operating a permanent Oval. Another option would be to dismantle the outer E0 structures of the Oval and to maintain anB0uncovered speed skating ice rink for the use during winter months. Size-wise, theA0ice-rink would fit inside the existing horse C2 race track, so both tracks could even be maintained side-by side. E0

A1 Entry Field A0

of Play

A2 Field Training Area A1 of Play A2 Area A3 Training Areas for designated

Users

A3 for designated Users A4 Areas Load Zone and/ or Parking

Area

A4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

OLYMPIC FAMILY

B0 Entry

B1 Areas for designated Users

TEAMS/ OFFICIALS A0ATHLETES/ Entry

B0 Entry

ATHLETES/ TEAMS/ OFFICIALS

B1 Areas for designated Users

B3 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

SPECTATORS SPECTATORS C0 Entry E0 E0

C0 Entry

D0 E1

C1 Spectator Plaza/ Services

C2 Load Zone

C3 Coach Parking

MEDIA

MEDIA 1

D0 Entry Entry D0

C1 2

A0 B0 E0 E0

D1 Media MediaArea, Area,Broadcasting Broadcasting Area D1 Area

LoadZone Zoneand/ and/ororParking Parking Area D2 Load Area

B0 A0

C1 E0

OPERATIONS OPERATIONS

E0 E0 Entry Entry

D2 E1 E1 Operational OperationalArea Area

C0 E0 A0 D0 E0

E2 Flower Ceremony E4

E3 Ski Lift E5

E4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

E5 F Olympic Overlay Structures

E5 G Grandstands

E5 H Standing Positions

C3 E0

E5 H Standing Positions E5 I Public Transport Stop

E5 I Public Transport Stop

Perimeter Fence O-Park A0

1,500

iu r ad

B0 C0

Secure Perimeter Fence

Railway

Transport Route

Transport Route Route Pedestrian Pedestrian Route

Alpine Skiing

Ice Hockey

Airport

Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required

Alpine Skiing Biathlon

Ice Hockey Luge

Airport Athletes' Accomodation

Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required Existing infrastructure,

BiathlonBobsleigh

Luge Nordic Combined

Athletes' Accomodation International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Existing infrastructure, Planned permanent infrastructure permanent works required

NordicShort Combined Track Speed Skating

International Centre (IBC) Main HotelBroadcast Area

(irrespective of the Games)

Main Press Centre (MPC) Main Hotel Area

Planned permanent infrastructure Additional permanent infrastructure 4 2 96 (irrespective of the Games)

Bobsleigh Cross-Country Skiing

ProProjekt AS&P Curling Skiing Cross-Country

April 2012 Short Skeleton Track Speed Skating

permanent works required

(Games dependent)

Curling Figure Skating

Ski Jumping Skeleton

Medal Ceremonies Main Press Centre (MPC)

Additional permanent infrastructure Temporary venues required (Games dependent) for the Olympic Winter Games

Freestyle (Aerials) Figure Skating

Snowboard (SBX) Ski Jumping

Media Village Medal Ceremonies

Temporary venues required

4.2.5 Curling Lviv Trade Fair Status

New

Capacity

3,000

Altitude

335 m

Construction Costs

EUR 35 MM

Implementation Time

2014-2017

Legacy

Trade Fair

Remarks The curling competitions with 3,000 seats could be held in one (the northern) of the five 10,000 mÂ˛ halls of the projected trade fair at the eastern end of the Olympic Park. If five halls were operating by 2022, no permanent construction measures would be required for the Games. The entire venue overlay would be of temporary nature. After the Games, permanent curling rinks could be installed in one of the three training ice rinks leaving a legacy for curling post-Games. ATHLETES/TEAMS/ TEAMS/OFFICIALS OFFICIALS ATHLETES/ A0 Entry A0 Entry A1 Field of Play A1 Field of Play A2 Training Area A2 Training Area

Main Press Centre

A3 Areas for designated Users A3 Areas for designated Users

A4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area A4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

A0 C2

OLYMPIC FAMILY OLYMPIC FAMILY

B0 Entry B0 Entry

B1 Areas for designated Users B1 Areas for designated Users

B3 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area B3 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

B0 A0 C1

SPECTATORS SPECTATORS

C0 Entry C0 Entry

C1 Spectator Plaza/ Services C1 Spectator Plaza/ Services

C2 Load Zone C2 Load Zone C3 Coach Parking C3 Coach Parking

IBC

MEDIA MEDIA

D0 Entry D0 Entry D1 Media Area, Broadcasting Area D1 Media Area, Broadcasting Area D2 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area D2 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

2 3

F 4

B0 A0

OPERATIONS OPERATIONS

IBC

C3 D2 A0 D0 E0

IBC

B0 C0

IBC

E0 Entry E0 Entry E1 Operational Area E1 Operational Area E2 Flower Ceremony E4 E2 Flower Ceremony E4 E3 Ski Lift E5 E3 Ski Lift E5 E4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area E4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area E5 F Olympic Overlay Structures E5 F Olympic Overlay Structures E5 G Grandstands E5 G Grandstands E5 H Standing Positions E5 H Standing Positions E5 I Public Transport Stop

E5 I Public Transport Stop

1,500

Alpine Skiing

Ice Hockey

d m ra

ius

Airport

Alpine Skiing Biathlon

Ice Hockey Luge

Airport Athletes' Accomodation

Biathlon Bobsleigh

Luge Nordic Combined

Athletes' Accomodation International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Bobsleigh Cross-Country Skiing

Nordic Combined Short Track Speed Skating

International Broadcast Centre (IBC) Main Hotel Area

Cross-Country Skiing Short Track Speed Skating ProProjekt Curling AS&P April 2012 Skeleton

Main Hotel Area Main Press Centre (MPC)

Curling Figure Skating

Skeleton Ski Jumping

Main Press Centre (MPC) Medal Ceremonies

Figure Skating Freestyle (Aerials)

Ski Jumping Snowboard (SBX)

Medal Ceremonies Media Village

Perimeter Fence O-Park Secure Perimeter Fence Railway Railway Transport Route Transport Route Pedestrian Route Pedestrian Route

Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required Existing infrastructure, permanent works required Existing infrastructure, permanent works required Planned permanent infrastructure (irrespective of the Games) Planned permanent infrastructure (irrespective of the Games) Additional permanent infrastructure 4 3 96 (Games dependent) Additional permanent infrastructure (Games dependent) Temporary venues required for the Olympic Winter Games Temporary venues required for the Olympic Winter Games

4.2.6 Olympic Village Lviv Olympic Village Status

New

Capacity

4,000 beds

Altitude

335 m

Construction Costs

EUR 275 MM

Implementation Time

2017-2021

Legacy

Residential

Remarks The Olympic Village would be situated north of the Olympic Park on approx. 23 ha. It would accommodate approx. 4,000 athletes and team officials in residential units and will be supplemented by various operational areas. The location of the Olympic Village would allow athletes to travel to the competitions with a few minutes. The medium term- strategy of the city of Lviv projects residential use in this area irrespective of the Games. Therefore it is recommended to synchronise the municipal plans with the requirements of an Olympic Village in the following and to make provisions for securing the required land-sizes.

ATHLETES/ TEAMS/ OFFICIALS A0 Entry ATHLETES/ TEAMS/ OFFICIALS A1 Field of Play A0 Entry

E0 B0

A2 Training Area A1 Field of Play

Olympic Village B0

A3 Areas for designated Users A2 Training Area A4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area A3 Areas for designated Users

A0 C2

Media Village

A4 OLYMPIC Load ZoneFAMILY and/ or Parking Area

I E1 D2

B0 Entry OLYMPIC FAMILY B1 Areas for designated Users B0 Entry B3 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area B1 Areas for designated Users

A4 I

B3 SPECTATORS Load Zone and/ or Parking Area C0 Entry

SPECTATORS

C1 Spectator Plaza/ Services C0 Entry C2 Load Zone C1 Spectator Plaza/ Services C3 Coach Parking C2 Load Zone

MEDIA 1

C3 Coach Parking

D0 Entry

MEDIA

D1 Media Area, Broadcasting Area D0 Entry D2 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area D1 Media Area, Broadcasting Area

F 4

B0 A0

OPERATIONS

D2 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

E0 Entry

OPERATIONS

E1 Operational Area A0 D0 E0

E0 Entry E2 Flower Ceremony E4

IOC-Hotel A0

E1 Operational Area E3 Ski Lift E5 E4 Flower Ceremony E2 E4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

E5 Ski Lift E3 E5 F Olympic Overlay Structures

E4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area E5 G Grandstands

B0 C0

MPC

E5 F Olympic Overlay Structures E5 H Standing Positions E5 G Grandstands E5 I Public Transport Stop E5 H Standing Positions

Perimeter Fence O-Park

E5 I Public Transport Stop

Curling

1,500

d m ra

ius

Ice Hockey

Biathlon

Luge

Airport Athletes' Accomodation

Alpine Skiing Bobsleigh

Ice Hockey Nordic Combined

Airport International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Biathlon Cross-Country Skiing

Luge Short Track Speed Skating

Athletes' Accomodation Main Hotel Area

Bobsleigh AS&P ProProjekt Curling

Nordic Combined April 2012 Skeleton

Secure Perimeter Transport Route Fence Railway Pedestrian Route

IBC Alpine Skiing

Railway

International Broadcast Centre (IBC) Main Press Centre (MPC)

Cross-Country Skiing Figure Skating

Short Track Speed Skating Ski Jumping

Main Hotel Area Medal Ceremonies

Curling Freestyle (Aerials)

Skeleton Snowboard (SBX)

Main Press Centre (MPC) Media Village

Transport Route

Existing infrastructure, Pedestrian Route no permanent works required Existing infrastructure, Existing infrastructure, permanent works required no permanent works required Planned permanent infrastructure Existing infrastructure, (irrespective of the Games) permanent works required Additional permanent infrastructure 4 4 96 Planned (Gamespermanent dependent)infrastructure (irrespective of the Games) Temporary venues required for the Olympic Winter Games Additional permanent infrastructure (Games dependent)

4.2.7 Main Media Village Main Media Village Status

New

Capacity

6,500

Altitude

335 m

Construction Costs

EUR 520 MM

Implementation Time

2016-2021

Legacy

Residential

Remarks A 25 ha-sized Media Village could adjoin the Olympic Village to the east and is also part of a municipal medium term-strategy to create residential areas. The Media Village would host 6,500 rooms and would be located in walking distance to the IBC and MPC. A bus terminal would be needed to operate for the media representatives to reach venues outside the Olympic Park. Similar to the Olympic Village, the Media Village would be used as a residential (here for social housing and young families) area for the people of Lviv post-Games.

4.2.8 International Broadcast Centre (IBC), Main Press Centre (MPC) Lviv Trade Fair Status

New

Capacity

40,000 m²

Altitude

335 m

Construction Costs

EUR 185 MM

Implementation Time

2014-2017

Legacy

Trade Fair

Remarks The International Broadcasting Centre (IBC) would be the temporary hub for broadcasters during the Games. Experiences from previous Games show, that trade fair exhibition halls offer good conditions for the use as IBC. It is therefore recommended to combine the need of an Olympic IBC with the medium-term plans to establish a trade fair/ convention centre. Currently Lviv is lacking larger and modern exhibition spaces and is seeking to install a trade fair/ convention centre irrespective of the Games. The required spaces for an IBC are 40,000 m² which can be provided in four exhibition halls. The IBC would offer good working conditions for the media due to the proximity to the competition venues and separate access routes. A supplementary multi- storey car park could complete a highprofile IBC/ trade fair precinct that would not only meet IOC requirements but also enable the city of Lviv to become an established destination for conventions and exhibitions. The location and the design of the IBC with its five exhibitions halls would allow for a development in stages that could be launched irrespective of a bid to host the Games. No permanent measures are required for the temporary transformation into an IBC. After the Games the IBC would be used again as trade fair/ convention centre. The Main Press Centre (MPC) is the central work place for the accredited written and photographic press covering the Games. Whereas the IBC requires large areas on one level, a MPC can be located in a multi-storey office building with 20,000 m² of gross floor area. The Lviv MPC could be located in a new office building adjacent to the northern end of the IBC. In the post-use the building would offer flexibleusable office spaces.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

4.3 Ice Hockey 2 Lviv Ice Hockey Arena Status

New

Capacity

6,000

Altitude

335 m

Construction Costs

EUR 40 MM

Implementation Time

2012-2015

Legacy

Ice Hockey/ Multi-Purpose

Remarks The smaller new ice hockey arena (2) is planned to be built permanently just 4km away north-east of the Olympic Village and the Olympic Park. The current site is undeveloped and features good public access. The venue could be served by shuttle busses and public transport. The current site is currently being discussed for a development irrespective of the Games to meet the needs for the Euro Basket 2015. The arena would allow for hosting the smaller ice hockey 2 Arena with 6,000 seats in normal operation. During the Olympic Games additional temporary installations and operational zones, would require the use of the area rounds around the adjacent store south east of the site. In the post-use the arena will serve community needs as a multifunctional facility.

ATHLETES/ TEAMS/ OFFICIALS A0 Entry TEAMS/ OFFICIALS ATHLETES/ A1 Field of Play

A0 Entry

A2 Training Area

A1 Field of Play

A3 Areas for A2 Training Area E0 B0

A4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area OLYMPIC FAMILY

A0 C2

OLYMPIC FAMILY B0 Entry

E0C0 C0

designated Users

A4 Load Zone and/ Users or Parking Area A3 Areas for designated

B0 Entry B1 Areas

for designated Users

B1 Areas for designated B3 Load Zone and/ Users or Parking

Area

B3 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

SPECTATORS

SPECTATORS C0 Entry

2 E5 I

C0 Entry

E5 I

C1 Spectator Plaza/ Services

C2 Load Zone

C3 Coach Parking

MEDIA

C0 A3

MEDIA 1

existing structure

D0 Entry

E5 F

D0 Entry

E5 F

D1 Media Area, Broadcasting Area

A0 B0 A0

OPERATIONS

D2 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

OPERATIONS E5 F

D2 D0 C3

+ 346 m

E2 Flower E4 Ceremony E2 Flower E4 Ceremony

E0 Entry E0 Entry E1 Operational E1 Operational Area Area

A0 D0 E0 C0

D1 Media Area, Broadcasting Area

D2 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

E3 Ski E5 E3 Lift E5 Ski

Lift

E4 Load ZoneZone and/ or Parking Area E4 Load and/ or Parking

Area

E5 F Olympic Overlay Structures E5 F Olympic Overlay Structures

E5 G Grandstands E5 G Grandstands

E5 H Standing Positions

E5 I Public Transport Stop

Perimeter Fence O-Park

Secure Perimeter Fence

Railway N

50 m

100 m

1,500

d m ra

ius

Railway / Tram

Transport Route

Transport Route Pedestrian Route

Pedestrian Route Alpine Skiing

Ice Hockey

Airport

Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required

Biathlon

Luge

Athletes' Accomodation

Existing infrastructure, permanent works required

Bobsleigh

Nordic Combined

International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Planned permanent infrastructure

Ich bin eine Copy für (irrespective Anzeigen ofund ich erkläre the Games) den Superwitz aus Headline und Bild da oben. für Anzeigen und ich erkläre den Superwitz aus Additional permanent infrastructure ProProjekt AS&P April 2012 46 Curling Skeleton Main Press Centre (MPC) (Games Meistens mach ich noch eindependent) paar Bemerkungen Headline und Bild da oben. Meistens mach ich Figure Skating Jumping aberrequired heute hab Temporaryist venues noch ein paar BemerkungenSkidarüber, wie toll das Medal Ceremoniesdarüber, wie toll das Produkt for the Olympic Winter Games ich dazu überhaupt keine Lust. Ich erzähl mal ProduktFreestyle ist aber heute hab ich dazu überhaupt (Aerials) Snowboard (SBX) Media Village Cross-Country Ich bin eine Skiing Copy

Short Track Speed Skating

Main Hotel Area

4.4 Luge, Bobsleigh, Skeleton Lviv Sliding Centre Status

New

Capacity

1,000 seating (10,000 standing)

Altitude

280-400 m

Construction Costs

EUR 150 MM

Implementation Time

2015-2020

Legacy

Ice Track/ Centre of Excellence

Remarks The bobsleigh, luge and skeleton competitions could be held at a potential new sliding centre in eastern Lviv. First ideas for this project have been developed and a preliminary site has been identified by the National Sports Federation. The topography generally allows for the planning of an artificial ice rink. The sliding centre would be situated close to the ring road connecting the venue to the Olympic Village and the IBC/ MPC. As the detailed planning of an artificial ice rink is a highly sophisticated task, the attached map indicates a first sketch only that must not be taken as a verified and approved venue plan. In the following, this diagram will need to be detailed further to meet the latest technical requirements. In addition, the topography and the soil conditions have to be studied. The outcome of the work will be needed as a basis for a final decision on the realisationE0of an ice rink in this location. After the Games, the sliding centre could serve as B0 centre of excellence and could apply for A0 hosting international events. The final decision of the location should be driven by the post-use perspectives C2 and therefore needs to be studied in close cooperation E0 I with the Sports Federation. D0

E1 A3

ATHLETES/ TEAMS/ OFFICIALS A0 Entry A1 Field of Play

ATHLETES/ TEAMS/ OFFICIALS

A2 Training Area

A0 Entry A3 Areas for designated Users A1 Field of Play A4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area A2 Training Area

OLYMPIC FAMILY A3 Areas for designated Users B0 Entry A4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area B1 Areas for designated Users

OLYMPIC FAMILY

B3 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

B0 Entry

SPECTATORS

B1 C0 B3 C1

Areas for designated Users Entry Load Zone and/ or Parking Area Spectator Plaza/ Services

SPECTATORS

C2 Load Zone

E4 E4

C3 C0 Coach Entry Parking

C1 MEDIA Spectator Plaza/ Services

E5 I

C2 Entry Load Zone D0

+ 280 m

D0 OPERATIONS Entry

E5 H

MEDIA D2 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

B0 B0 A0

C3 Media CoachArea, Parking D1 Broadcasting Area

C1 A0

B3 D2 E5 H A0 D0 E0

E5 G D1 C3

D1 Entry Media Area, Broadcasting Area E0

D2 Operational Load Zone Area and/ or Parking Area E1 E2 Flower E4 Ceremony OPERATIONS

E5 H E5 Ski Lift E3 E0 Entry

C3 C3

E4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area E1 Operational Area

E5 H

E5 F 1

E1 B0 C0

E2 E4 E5 H

+ 400 m

E5 F E2 E4 E5 G E3 E5 E5 H E4 E5 I E5 F

Olympic Overlay Structures Flower Ceremony Grandstands Ski Lift Standing Positions Load Zone and/ or Parking Area Public Transport Stop Olympic Overlay Structures Perimeter Fence O-Park

E5 G Grandstands 0

100m

200m

1,500

d m ra

ius A3

Railway E5 H Standing Positions Transport Route E5 I Public Transport Stop Pedestrian Route Secure Perimeter Fence

Alpine Skiing

Ice Hockey

Airport

Existing infrastructure, Railway no permanent works required

Biathlon

Luge

Athletes' Accomodation

Bobsleigh

Nordic Combined

International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Existing infrastructure, permanent works required Pedestrian Route

Cross-Country Skiing Alpine Skiing

ProProjekt Curling AS&P

Short Track Speed Skating Ice Hockey

April 2012 Skeleton

Main Hotel Area Airport

Luge

Main Press Centre (MPC) Athletes' Accomodation

Figure Skating Bobsleigh

Ski Jumping Nordic Combined

Medal Ceremonies International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Freestyle (Aerials) Cross-Country Skiing

Snowboard (SBX) Short Track Speed Skating

Media Village Main Hotel Area

Biathlon

Transport Route

Planned permanent infrastructure (irrespective of the Games) Existing infrastructure, no permanent works infrastructure required 4 7 96 Additional permanent (Games dependent) Existing infrastructure, permanentvenues works required Temporary required for the Olympic Winter Games Planned permanent infrastructure (irrespective of the Games)

4.5 Freestyle - Aerials Ukraina Stadium Status

Existing (with temp. installations)

Capacity

10,000 seating (4,000 standing)

Altitude

350 m

Construction Costs

EUR 5 MM (excl. stadium renovation)

Implementation Time

2021-2022

Legacy

Sports venues (e.g. football)

Remarks The freestyle aerials competitions could be held temporarily in the Ukraina Stadium near the Olympic Park. The site will be served by coaches from the east and west and offers sufficient space for the installation of a temporary Olympic overlay. The finish area would be right in the centre of the stadium and would offer spectacular views for 14,000 spectators. After the Games all Olympic structures will be demounted but the renowned stadium will benefit from the general renovation in preparation of the Games.

ATHLETES/ TEAMS/ OFFICIALS A0 Entry

ATHLETES/ TEAMS/ OFFICIALS

A1 Field of Play A0 Entry

A2 Training Area

A1 Field of Play

A3 Areas for designated Users

A2 Training Area

A4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

A3 Areas for designated Users

OLYMPIC FAMILY

A4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

A0 C2

B0 Entry

OLYMPIC FAMILY

B1 Areas for designated Users

B0 Entry

B3 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

B1 Areas for designated Users

B3 SPECTATORS Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

SPECTATORS C0 Entry F

C1 Entry Spectator C0

Plaza/ Services

C1 Plaza/ Services C2 Spectator Load Zone

C2 Zone C3 Load Parking Coach

C3 Coach Parking MEDIA

MEDIA

D0 Entry

D1 Media Area, Broadcasting Area

E0 C0 D0

D1 Media Area, Broadcasting Area

C3 4

C3 D2

B0 A0

OPERATIONS OPERATIONS

D2 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

E0 Entry

E1 Operational Area

D0 C0 B0

A0 D0 E0

E2 Flower Ceremony E4

C3 C3

E4 Load LoadZone Zone and/ Parking Area E4 and/ or or Parking Area

B1 A0

E3 Ski Lift E5 E5 E3 Ski Lift

F Olympic Olympic Overlay Structures E5 FE5 Overlay Structures

E5 G E5 G Grandstands Grandstands

E5 H Positions E5 H Standing Standing Positions E5 IE5 Stop I Public PublicTransport Transport Stop

Perimeter Fence O-Park

Secure Perimeter Fence

Railway

1,500

d m ra

ius

Railway

Transport Route

Pedestrian Route

Pedestrian Route Alpine Skiing

Ice Hockey

Alpine Skiing

Ice Hockey

Biathlon

Luge

Biathlon

Luge Bobsleigh

Nordic Combined

Cross-Country Skiing

Cross-Country Skiing ProProjekt Curling AS&P Curling

Figure Skating

Figure Skating Freestyle (Aerials)

Athletes' Accomodation

Athletes' Accomodation Nordic Combined

Bobsleigh

Airport

Short Track Speed Skating

International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

International Broadcast Centre (IBC) Main Hotel Area

Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required Existing infrastructure,

no permanent works required

Existing infrastructure, permanent works required Existing infrastructure,

permanent works required

Planned permanent infrastructure (irrespective of the Games)

Planned permanent infrastructure

Main Hotel Area

(irrespective of the Games) Additional permanent infrastructure 4 8 96 (Games dependent)

Skeleton

Main Press Centre (MPC)

Ski Jumping Snowboard (SBX)

Medal Ceremonies Media Village

(Games dependent) Temporary venues required for the Olympic Winter Games

Short Track Speed Skating April 2012 Skeleton Ski Jumping

Main Press Centre (MPC) Medal Ceremonies

Additional permanent infrastructure Temporary venues required for the Olympic Winter Games

5. Master Plan - Tysovets Snow Zone

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

5. Master Plan - Tysovets Snow Zone Tysovets, still belonging to the Lviv oblast, is located around 130 km south of Lviv and 32 km from Skole. It is an old military ski training base, and today an area of approx. 11,000 ha still belongs to the Ministry of Defense. Two ski jumping hills as well as a cross country and biathlon track and shooting range were used for athletes training are still existing. While the cross country and biathlon track are still being used for training and smaller competitions, the ski jumping hills are in very poor condition and not used anymore. Nevertheless, all existing venues and facilities do neither fulfill Olympic nor international standard and would need to be newly constructed. For strategic reasons it would still be recommended to account the venues as existing with upgrades required. With a base elevation of 900 m above sea level and a maximum elevation of about 1,100 m, Tysovets has reliable snow conditions for a long winter period and has an adequate height for international training. Even though the topography would be challenging for the venue allocation of the Olympic Games, the natural conditions could ensure good conditions for a national training centre of excellence for Nordic sports. Currently a few slopes for beginners and lower intermediates exist in the small ski area of Tysovets. Even though several additional areas for future slopes have been identified by the local experts, the potential for high-class alpine tourism is limited compared to the Borzhava region. Nevertheless, the Tysovets area could serve as a tourism location for local and regional tourist, not only offering a small range of winter sport possibilities, but also summer activities like mountain biking, trekking or hiking.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

5.1 Overview

3. 0

s diu ra

Precinct B: Nordic Centre + 1,050 m + 950 m

Ty ysovettts s

+ 980 m

+ 880 m

+ 960 m

Precinct C: Jumping Centre + 800 m

Orya Ory Or ry y vc vch chy hyk h k + 730 m

Ko oz' z'ov ova ova ov + 620 m

Precinct A: Board & Freestyle Centre

M06

P ha Po ar

Alpine Skiing

Ice Hockey

Airport

Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required

Biathlon

Luge

Athletes' Accomodation

Existing infrastructure, permanent works required

Bobsleigh

Nordic Combined

International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Cross-Country Skiing

Short Track Speed Skating

Main Hotel Area

Curling

Skeleton

Main Press Centre (MPC)

Figure Skating

Ski Jumping

Medal Ceremonies

Freestyle (Aerials)

Snowboard (SBX)

Media Village

Freestyle (Moguls)

Snowboard (PGS)

Opening & Closing Ceremonies

Freestyle (Ski-Halfpipe)

Snowboard (Halfpipe)

Olympic Family Hotel

Freestyle (Slopestyle)

Snowboard (Slopestyle)

Olympic Village

Freestyle (Ski Cross)

Speed Skating

Railway Station

Planned permanent infrastructure (irrespective of the Games) Additional permanent infrastructure (Games dependent) Temporary venues required for the Olympic Winter Games 0

1 km

2 km

Snow Park Media Centre

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

The Tysovets Snow Zone could serve as a very compact Games Zone comprising the following competition and non-competition venues: > Precinct A: Board and Freestyle Centre (Snowb./ freestyle events excl. moguls and aerials) > Precinct B: Nordic centre (biathlon, cross country, nordic combined together with Pr. 2) > Precinct C: Ski Jumping Centre (ski jumping and freestyle-moguls) > Olympic Snow Village/ Sub Media Centre/ Media Village(s)

All venues would be located within 2,5 km radius. The Tysovets Snow-Zone could offer a very compact allocation of venues but is lacking larger flat areas and sufficient road infrastructures on the other hand. The major restructuring of the road system leading to Tysovets as well as major upgrades/ additions of/to the existing road network within the Snow-Zone are basic prerequisites to include Tysovets in an overall Games-concept. Still, further detailed assessments of the topography and the framework conditions will be required.

5.2. Snow Village

Status

New

Capacity

2,000 beds

Altitude

950 m

Construction Costs

EUR 137 MM

Implementation Time

2017-2021

Legacy

Tourism Accommodation

Remarks The Olympic Snow Village would accommodate 2,000 athletes and additional team officials. A preliminary site has been identified east of the Nordic Centre which features approx. 20 ha in size. Due to the challenging topography further studies will become necessary in the following to develop a layout for the Olympic Snow Village and the associated operational areas. The vicinity to the Nordic centre will need to be analysed closer as well. In the post-use the Snow Village would serve mainly touristic demands. The location next to an attractive hill with existing slopes supports this legacy.

5.3 Media Village / Sub Media Centre (SMC)

Status

New

Capacity

3,500 rooms

Altitude

960 m

Construction Costs

EUR 305 MM

Implementation Time

2017-2021

Legacy

Temporary

Remarks The preliminary location for the Sub Media and the Media Village could be between the Precinct A and B. The eastern area which could serve as a SMC is developed in parts already whereas the western part for the Media Village with 3,500 rooms would need to be designed from scratch. The indicated location and size (as shown in 5.1) would work in general - however as the market demand will likely be satisfied with the residential or hotel units of the Snow Village, it should be considered for legacy reasons to split the Media Village into smaller units, which could be located within distances of up to 20 km from the Snow Zone.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

5.4 Precinct A: Board and Ski Centre

Status

New

Capacity

4,000 (10,000)

Altitude

800-1,000 m

Construction Costs

EUR 30 MM

Implementation Time

2019-2021

Legacy

Skiing

Remarks The combined venue precinct of the Board and Ski Arena is located just 5 km south of the Snow Village and provides an excellent setting for a great spectator experience. The snowboard cross, the snowboard parallel giant slalom, the snowboard half-pipe and slopestyle events such as the freestyle ski cross, freestyle ski halfpipe and freestyle slopestyle competitions would each host 14,000 spectators in grandstands and standing areas. A combined precinct with two finish areas and 4 fields of play will need to be planned. Currently it is suggested to plan the half-pipe temporary and use the other three slopes for tourism purposes after the Games.

5.5 Precinct B: Nordic Centre Cross Country Status

Existing/ Major Upgrade

Capacity

3,000 (10,000)

Altitude

980 m

Construction Costs

Together with Biathlon

Implementation Time

2012-2016

Legacy

Cross Country

Biathlon Status

Existing/ Major Upgrade

Capacity

5,000 (10,000)

Altitude

980 m

Construction Costs

EUR 40 MM

Implementation Time

2012-2016

Legacy

Biathlon

Remarks The biathlon and cross country skiing competitions and the nordic combined cross country event would be held on the grounds of the existing Tysovets Nordic Centre, adjoining the Snow Village. With the biathlon competitions hosting 15,000 spectators and the cross country events providing space for 13,000 spectators, the precinct will fulfil all requirements. The courses are existing in large quantities but will need to be complemented by new slopes. As the area itself is capable to accommodate all required structures it will be necessary to work on more detailed plans in association with the Sports Federation to find a first course for the slopes and to verify the locations of the two arenas. The proximity to the ski jumping hills (less than 2 km) which is essential for the nordic combined underlines the compactness of the Tysovets Snow Zone. The area is very secure in terms of snowfall at an altitude of approx. 900m. After the Games, the Nordic Centre would not only be able to draw international competitions but would also function as a centre of excellence.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

5.6 Precinct C: Ski Jumping Centre Ski Jumping Status

Existing/ Major Upgrade

Capacity

3,000 (10,000)

Altitude

880 m

Construction Costs

EUR 40 MM

Implementation Time

2014-2018

Legacy

Ski Jumping

Moguls Status

Existing/ Upgrade

Capacity

4,000 (10,000)

Altitude

880 m

Construction Costs

EUR 10 MM

Implementation Time

2020-2021

Legacy

Temporary/ Skiing

Remarks The ski jumping and nordic combined competitions would all be held at the area of the existing ski jump hills. Located only 2,5 km away from a projected site for the Olympic Snow Village the venue offers shortest travel times for the athletes. The two existing hills are currently not in operation and are outdated. For the Games both ski-jumping hills would need to be rebuilt to meet the requirements for a K-125 and K-90 hill. After the Games, these venues would be used as a centre of excellence for ski jumping and can attract international competitions. An existing slope adjoining east offers a suitable gradient to host the freestyle moguls events. This venue would be situated in one precinct with the ski jumping venue. The grandstand can be combined and overlay structures will be shared. After the Games the moguls slope would be used again for touristic purposes. The freestyle moguls events would host 14,000 spectators whereas the ski jumping events would have a capacity of 13,000 spectators.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

6. Master Plan - Volovets Alpine Arena

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

6. Master Plan - Volovets Alpine Arena The central Carpathian Mountains could set the stage for hosting the Ski Alpine events in the Volovets Alpine Arena. A 500 bed athleteâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s accommodation will offer all services in closest proximity to the venue. All required spaces and services for spectators, media representatives, Olympic Family and athletes could be offered in the same quality as in the Tysovets Snow Zone or the Lviv Ice Zone. After the Games the facilities could be a tourist asset and would mark a long-term touristic development of the Carpathian region. The Carpathians Mountains are indeed an area which huge potential for a touristic development. However, until today there is no master plan to develop the region in a reasonable and sustainable way, the Olympic Bid will be an ideal catalyst for such a plan. A touristic master plan should care for comprehensive planning for the new ski resort while at the same time regulate the development to prevent the beautiful mountains of being destroyed by sporadic and uncontrolled growth. The development would provide an extraordinary legacy for tourism in the region and provide the people in this underdeveloped region with a new horizon. A prime skiing and summer resort in the beautiful mountains around Volovets and Borzhava will kick-start the tourism development in the Carpathians and possibly lead to further expansion of tourism into surrounding areas. There is already a growing demand across the region from countries such as Russia, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary and Romania for winter sports in the Carpathian Mountains. The region could receive important upgrades to its general infrastructure and accommodation capacities, but also enjoy important exposure by national and international media. Together these two factors could blaze the trail to establish the region as a highly attractive national and international tourism resort. As for Tysovets major transportation upgrades as described in Chapter 7. Transport would be basic prerequisites to include Volovets in an overall concept. As the detailed planning of all SkiAlpine Slopes is a highly sophisticated task, the attached map indicates a first sketch only that must not be taken as a verified and approved venue plan. This diagram would need to be detailed/ verified further to meet the latest technical requirements.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

6.1 Overview

to Lviv/ Tysovets

Volovets

TO718

TO718 Huvlyv Huv lyvyi yi

Huvlyv Huv lyvyi yi

Volovets Alpine Arena Volovets Alpine Arena

Alpine Skiing

Ice Hockey

Airport

Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required

Biathlon

Luge

Athletes' Accomodation

Bobsleigh Alpine Skiing

Nordic Combined Ice Hockey

International Broadcast Centre (IBC) Airport

Cross-Country Skiing Biathlon

Short LugeTrack Speed Skating

Main HotelAccomodation Area Athletes'

Curling Bobsleigh

Skeleton Nordic Combined

Main Press Centre (MPC)Centre (IBC) International Broadcast

Figure Skating Skiing Cross-Country

Ski Jumping Short Track Speed Skating

Medal Main Ceremonies Hotel Area

Freestyle Curling (Aerials)

Snowboard Skeleton (SBX)

Media Main Village Press Centre (MPC)

Existing infrastructure, permanent works required Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required Planned permanent infrastructure (irrespective of the Games) Existing infrastructure, permanent works required Additional permanent infrastructure (Games dependent) Planned permanent infrastructure (irrespective of therequired Games) Temporary venues for the Olympic Winter Games Additional permanent infrastructure (Games dependent)

Freestyle (Moguls) Figure Skating

Snowboard (PGS) Ski Jumping

Opening & Closing Ceremonies Medal Ceremonies

Freestyle Freestyle(Ski-Halfpipe) (Aerials)

Snowboard Snowboard(Halfpipe) (SBX)

Olympic Family Hotel Media Village

Freestyle Freestyle(Slopestyle) (Moguls)

Snowboard Snowboard(Slopestyle) (PGS)

Olympic Village Opening & Closing Ceremonies

Freestyle Cross) Freestyle(Ski (Ski-Halfpipe)

Speed Skating Snowboard (Halfpipe)

Railway OlympicStation Family Hotel

Freestyle (Slopestyle)

Snowboard (Slopestyle)

Freestyle (Ski Cross)

Speed Skating

Temporary venues required for the Olympic Winter Games

Snow ParkVillage Media Centre Olympic

Railway Station Snow Park Media Centre

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

6.2 Athletes Accommodation

Status

New

Capacity

400 rooms

Altitude

680 m

Construction Costs

EUR 56 MM

Implementation Time

2018-2020

Legacy

Tourism

Remarks In Volovets it is proposed to accommodate the athletes in one bigger 4 star hotel complex offering all services required during the Games. Approx. 300 athletes plus around 200 team delegation members would need to be accommodated. While athletes could partially also share rooms, a single occupancy of the team members would be assumed, summing up to 350-400 required rooms. The hotel complex would serve as tourist accommodation for the Borzhava region after the Games.

6.3 Media Accommodation

Status

New

Capacity

500 rooms

Altitude

680 m

Construction Costs

EUR 40 MM

Implementation Time

2019-2021

Legacy

Tourism

Remarks In Volovets it is proposed to accommodate the media representatives in several 3 star hotels, with a total capacity of 500 beds. These hotels would serve as tourist accommodation for the Borzhava region after the Games.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

6.4 Volovets Alpine Centre Borzhava Status

New

Capacity

8,000 (10,000)

Altitude

680-1590 m

Construction Costs

EUR 200 MM

Implementation Time

2012-2018

Legacy

Tourism/ Skiing Resort

Remarks With a maximum vertical drop of 900 m the mountains close to Borzhava provides the required topography to design the slopes for all Alpine Skiing disciplines. A common finish area could host 18,000 spectators.

ATHLETES/ TEAMS/ OFFICIALS ATHLETES/ TEAMS/ OFFICIALS A0 Entry A0 Entry A1 Field of Play A1 Field of Play

A0 B0

A3 Areas for designated Users A3 Areas for designated Users

D0 C2

A2 Training Area A2 Training Area

OLYMPIC FAMILY OLYMPIC FAMILY

E0 Media Accommodation

B0 Entry B0 Entry B1 Areas for designated Users B1 Areas for designated Users B3 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area B3 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

C3 C2

D1 A3

A4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area A4 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

Venue Media Centre

B0 A0 D1

D2 G

H + 680 m A1

SPECTATORS SPECTATORS

+ 865 m

C0 Entry C0 Entry C1 Spectator Plaza/ Services C1 Spectator Plaza/ Services C2 Load Zone C2 Load Zone C3 Coach Parking C3 Coach Parking

Slalom Women D0

Slalom Men

MEDIA MEDIA

Giant Slalom Women

+ 1.020 m

Giant Slalom Men

+ 1.220 m

Super G Women 3

Super G Men 4

B0 A0

OPERATIONS OPERATIONS

C3 D2 A0 D0 E3E0

C3 C3 1

+ 1.400 m

Downhill Women

E5 I Public Transport Stop

Downhill Men

00 + 1.590 1,5m

d m ra

ius

Alpine Skiing Alpine Skiing

Ice Hockey Ice Hockey

Airport Airport

Biathlon Biathlon

Luge Luge

Athletes' Accomodation Athletes' Accomodation

Bobsleigh Bobsleigh

Nordic Combined Nordic Combined

International Broadcast Centre (IBC) International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Cross-Country Skiing Cross-Country Skiing

Short Track Speed Skating Short Track Speed Skating

Main Hotel Area Main Hotel Area

Curling

Skeleton

Main Press Centre (MPC) Main Press Centre (MPC)

Figure Skating Figure Skating

Ski Jumping Ski Jumping

Medal Ceremonies Medal Ceremonies

Freestyle (Aerials)

Snowboard (SBX)

E5 F Olympic Overlay Structures E5 G Grandstands

E5 H Standing Positions E5 I Public Transport Stop A1

April 2012 Skeleton

E5 G Grandstands E5 H Standing Positions

ProProjekt Curling AS&P

D0 Entry D0 Entry D1 Media Area, Broadcasting Area D1 Media Area, Broadcasting Area D2 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area D2 Load Zone and/ or Parking Area

Media Village

Perimeter Fence O-Park Secure Perimeter Fence Railway Railway Transport Route Transport Route Pedestrian Route

Existing infrastructure, Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required no permanent works required Existing infrastructure, Existing infrastructure, permanent works required permanent works required Planned permanent infrastructure Planned permanent infrastructure (irrespective of the Games) (irrespective of the Games) Additional permanent infrastructure 5 9 96 Additional permanent infrastructure (Games dependent) (Games dependent) Temporary venues required Temporary venues required for the Olympic Winter Games for the Olympic Winter Games

7. Transport

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

7. Transport To evaluate the feasibility of Olympic Winter Games 2022 in Lviv from a traffic-related point of view, current and future transport infrastructure has been assessed in a first step analysis. As quantitative basis, a rough spectator demand model has been developed to explore the needs and challenges for all parts of the transport system. Resulting from these findings, the most relevant transport infrastructure measures required for Lviv and the Carpathian Mountains areas have been defined.

7.1 National and International Access Air Lviv International Airport serves as a regional airport for the Oblast Lviv and its surroundings. It is located in the South of city, 6 km from the city centre and 9 km (15 min.) from the planned Olympic Village. It is well accessible by road via the motorway ring M10 and via public transport (trolley bus). For the UEFA Euro 2012, the airport has been significantly modernised and expanded. After realisation of all works, it will provide a 3,300 m runway and a new passenger terminal able to handle up to 2,000 passengers per hour. By providing further (permanent or temporary) terminal capacities, the airport would be able to handle up to 3,700 passengers per hour, which would serve the additional through put needs during the Games. Today, the airport has an estimated 482,000 passengers per year and is served by domestic and international airlines offering national and international flights to European cities, such as Vienna, Moscow, Warsaw, Munich etc. Additionally, Uzhhorod International Airport provides access to the mountain region, especially to the Volovets Alpine Venues. With a distance of 100 km (90 min.) South-West of Volovets, it could serve as a VIP and athletes entry point. The airport currently offers a 2,000 m runway and one terminal with flights to Kyiv and Budapest. The most important international airport in Ukraine is the Boryspil International Airport in Kyiv sharing 62% of the country’s total volume of air passengers. Supposably, a share of international Olympic spectators would enter the country via this airport due to its wide range of international and national destinations. The Kyiv – Lviv rail connection is planned to be upgraded in order to reduce travel times significantly to 4:30 h.

No. of terminals No. of gates pax/h runway movements/ h

Sochi 2014

Pyeong Chang 2018

Salzburg 2014

Vancouver 2010

Torino 2006

Lviv 2022

Sochi International

Yangyang International

Salzburg International

Vancouver International

Turin International

Lviv International

2+1 VIP 21+2 VIP 3,800 24

1 6 1,320 7

2 18 3,200 20

3 64 8,000 88

4 47

2+1 3,700

Comparison of airport capacities of various Olympic host and candidate cities

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

Rail Lviv’s central railway station, handling 38,500 passengers daily at 8 tracks, is the main public transport hub in the western Ukraine since 1904. The adjacent suburban rail station serves 7,000 passengers per day at 6 tracks. Direct connections are available to the main regional and national centres as well as daily direct international connections to Budapest, Bratislava, Krakow, Minsk and Bucharest. The improvement and modernisation of national rail infrastructure, fleet and services is an ongoing process. Travel time from Lviv to Kyiv is planned to be reduced to 4:30 h. New inter-regional electric trains of nine carriages each will be installed in the course of 2012 on the national rail network. Furthermore, the implementation of double-decked carriers will contribute to a more efficient use of the existing infrastructure.

Road Western Ukraine is well-equipped with national and international highways, offering good access to the neighbouring countries (Belarus, Poland, Slowakia, Hungary and Romania) as well as to national and regional centres. The most important transversals are the M11 heading from Lviv to the Polish border and connecting the region with Krakow and western Europe. Highway M06 provides access not only to the Ukrainian capital Kyiv, but also to the Carpathian region and to border crossing points to Slowakia and Hungary near the city of Chop.

7.2 Existing Regional & Local Transport Infrastructure Regional rail In addition to the commuter rail network, the regional rail network provides direct connections to the main western Ukrainian centres such as Ivano-Frankivsk, Ternopil and Rivne. The two track rail connection to the Carpathian region follows the highway M06 in major parts. South of the city of Skole, it branches off and heads towards Slawske and Volovets. Further south, the regional centres of the transcarpathian Oblast (Mukachevo, Uzhhorod and Chop) are connected. From there, the railroad connects to the Slowakian and Hungarian network. The Lviv – Skole railroad consists of a 111 km double track. Travel time for this section is currently 1:40 h. Modernisation works will improve travel speed to 160 km/h and though reduce travel time to approx. 1:00 h. Costs are assumed to approx. EUR 100 million. The 57 km Skole - Volovets double track is forseen to be modernised too. Travel time is planned to be reduced from 1:30 h to 1:00 h after modernisation. The total investment amounts to EUR 80 million. Today, there is no rail connection between Skole and Tysovets. Two different routing options of a possible railroad have been proposed. The rail access would provide for a travel time Lviv –

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

Thysovets of approx. 1:15 h. Both options would follow a very ambitious and mountainous area and a steep, rugged valley in major parts. Beside of the quite high investment costs that amount of more than EUR 300 million (moderate assumption), the construction time would most likely exceed 2022. Furthermore, this mountainous area does not allow for high capacity trains, a fact that reduces the exceptional advantages of a rail connection for a mega event significantly. This rail project would only be recommended for realisation, if there was authentic prove of post-use benefit for the entire region. Additionally, the construction of a high-speed rail is being considered. These plans foresee a direct connection (for 200 km/h) from Lviv Airport via Truskawez to Tysovets to realise a travel time of 40 min. between Lviv and Tysovets. The limited capacity of a one track high-speed connection does not justify the enormous investment of more than EUR 3 billion, a reason why this study does not recommend this project for the Olympic Games concept.

Lviv public transport system The city of Lviv and its surroundings are served by a diversity of public transport infrastructure and service. Besides the very dense bus network, offering more than 400 regional and more than 50 local routes, the inner cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2DC;s transportation is based upon tram, Marshrutka (mini bus) and automobile modes. The tram network has grown continuousely since the 19th century and is well-developed, providing 9 lines (two ring lines and seven radial lines). The rolling stock suffers from its high average age of more than 25 years. Modernisation, maintenance and reconstruction works will have to be conducted during the next years in order to take advantage of the existing infrastructure. The city of Lviv will keep on complementing the network. Growing residential areas such as Sykhiv as well as the new stadium area and planned trade fair centre will be connected to the tram system by extending and connecting lines 3 and 4. The extension of line 4 will follow Chernovoy Kaliniy on 11 km, passing the previsioned aerials and ice hockey 2 venues, to reach the highly populated Sykhiv district. Construction works are planned to be finished by end of 2013. The new stadium and future Olympic Park will be served directly from the terminus of that line. In order to further complement the network, the city is planning to link the terminus of line 4 to the terminus of line 3, at the end of Knyagyny Olgy Street. This loop would add an additional stop serving the stadium directly. Both lines 3 and 4 provide direct access to the city centre, but there is no line linking the stadium to the Railway Station directly, although the track network allows such an additional line to be put in operation very quickly. There is no tramway link to the airport so far. Lvivâ&#x20AC;&#x2DC;s electric transport is supplemented by a dense trolley bus network consisting of 12 lines on 63 km. The current fleet is planned to be modernised during the next years. More than 70 Marshrutka lines are offering direct connections between the residential areas and

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

the city centre. Their high frequencies and low capacities contribute to a very high traffic load in the city centre and often obstruct other public transport means (tram and buses). The further development of the tram network is aimed to relieve the city centre from this drawback. However, the Marshrutka services are still a well accepted and popular mode of transport, serving more than 200 million passengers per year. road infrastructure During preparation for the UEFA Euro 2012, Lvivâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s road network has been widely reconstructed and modernised. Even though, road maintenance and reconstruction works will follow up. Major road network complements are foreseen for the next 10 to 20 years, of which the completion of the outer ring road (M10) and the inner ring road are likely to impose a significant value. In order to provide better access to the stadium area and planned trade fare centre, a new bypass road is planned to be realised in a short-term period. The access to the Tysovets area suffers from strong road inclinations and narrow valley situations that make smooth and easy access difficult. An extension of the existing road entering the valley from the M06 near Kozova is assumed to cost approx. EUR 50 million. Another remote access, following a valley northeast of Tysovets is calculated at EUR 100 million. The existing local road infrastructure does not provide access to the previsioned venues, a fact that makes further infrastructure investments necessary. The road infrastructure existing in Volovets is comparable to the one in Tysovets, but local landscape does not pose the same challenges. The most important road connection to the Carpathian region is the M06 highway with international connection to the Hungarian and Slowakian borders. Its modernisation has already been decided and further appropriate plans are being prepared. As Volovets is foreseen to host the alpine venue, a new 25 km road shortcut from Slavske to Volovets would be benefiting the concept. Furthermore, a 12 km modernisation of the existing connection between Volovets and the M06 would be required.

7.3 Objectives and Requirements of the IOC The provision of clear objectives and guidelines is fundamental to the modelling of traffic demands. The transport concept is based on three pillars, which also correspond to the requirements of the IOC: sustainability, environmental impact and a maximum of legacy and benefits to the affected region.

Sustainability The transportation concept of the Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games 2022 should be based to a large extent on the existing networks and infrastructure. An expansion of routes and tracks should take place only if the extension measures will serve for a post-Olympic demand. For both, infrastructure construction as well as selecting the vehicle fleet, a maximum thought should be paid to the promotion of environmentally friendly technologies. Environmental impacts of land use

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

and pollution should be restricted as far as possible. The use of public transport should be promoted ambitiously (e.g. by offering combined tickets) and is also an important prerequisite for the realisation of Olympic Winter Games. It is also essential to achieve a high share of coach usage (e.g. by providing attractive coach parking areas in close proximity to the sports venues, special rates, package deals, etc.). The affected regions should benefit from the Olympic Winter Games in terms of improvements in the conditions of mobility and accessibility. The long-term support of public transport contributes to the improvement of traffic-related environmental impacts and to a better accessibility of the region. During the event, acceptable travel times and direct connections should be realised.

Travel Times The most important traffic relations during Olympic Winter Games are the ones between the Olympic Village and the competition and training venues as well as between the media centres and the competition venues. Of course, there are other important destinations that are to be addressed in a further process. But in order to give a first recommendation, travel times (by bus) of the Lviv 2022 concept are compared to former bidding and host cities for the most important relations. Travel times between the city and the mountain zones exceed 100 minutes which is far beyond the journey periods offered by former bidding cities. Olympic Park [km] [min] 2022 Olympic Park Ice Hockey 2 Sliding Centre Snow Zone Tysovets Alpine Arena Volovets

Ice Hockey 2 [km] [min] 2022 4

Sliding Centre [km] [min] 2022

Snow Zone Tysovets [km] [min] 2022

Alpine Arena Volovets [km] [min] 2022

130

115

155

140

134

120

159

145

147

140

172

165

130

115

134

120

147

140

155

140

159

145

172

165

Estimated Travel Times Lviv 2022 (by bus)

7.4 Olympic Winter Games Quantity Framework This quantity framework aims to reflect traffic demands during potential Olympic Winter Games 2022 in Lviv and the affected mountain areas. It is based on certain conditions and assumptions that have been estimated for this stage of planning in the best possible way. Spectators usually IOC requirements

seating min

Alpine Skiing Biathlon Bobsleigh / Skeleton Cross Country Skiing Curling Figure Skating / Short Track Freestyle Skiing Ice Hockey 1 Ice Hockey 2 Luge Ski Jumping Snowboard Speed Skating Opening / Closing Ceremony

8.000 5.000 1.000 3.000 3.000 12.000 4.000 10.000 6.000 1.000 3.000 4.000 6.000 35.000

seating max

standing min

7.000

10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000

standing max 15.000

10.000

3.000

10.000 10.000 10.000

15.000

total min 18.000 15.000 11.000 13.000 3.000 12.000 14.000 10.000 6.000 11.000 13.000 14.000 6.000 35.000

total max 22.000

18.000

IOC requirements for spectator capacities of competition venues

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

induce most of the traffic loads on the available transport system, while most of the official constituent groups (such as athletes, IOC and Sports Federations’ officials, sponsors and marketing partners, media representatives, workforce of the local organising committee and volunteers) are using a dedicated fleet on a dedicated route and lane network. Logistical and maintenance traffic is mostly realised outside of peak traffic times, so there is no need for a detailed consideration. The biggest challenge for the infrastructure will be the spectator’s traffic. The conditions, assumptions and results are shown below. 7.4.1 General Assumptions Aspects that have major impact on spectator traffic demand are the capacities of the competition venues and the competition schedule. The IOC defines minimum spectator capacities for all competition venues. Basically, it is assumed that spectators meet the capacity of the sports facilities to 100%. Thus, the actual demand is overestimated. A competition schedule for possible Olympic Winter Games 2022 in Lviv is currently not yet available. For this reason, the schedule of the upcoming Olympic Winter Games in Sochi in 2014, which is depicted on the following figure, is taken as a basis. Although the schedule will be influenced in particular by „best“ times for the maximisation of revenue through advertising and sale of broadcasting rights and will be determined by the media, it can be assumed that the schedule of Sochi is a reliable assumption, since the geographic location and size, as well as time of daylight and prime time are largely the same. Ski half pipe and slope style events have already been included. Future disciplines that may influence the schedule are ignored for the time being.

Venue

9 10

February 12 13 14

19 20

21 22 23

Coastal Cluster, Sochi Olympic Park Ice Hockey 1 Ice Hockey 2 Speed Skating Figure Skating Short Track Curling Mountain Cluster, Krasnaya Polyana Bobsleigh Skeleton Luge Biathlon Cross-Country Skiing Nordic Combined Alpine Skiing Snowboard Freestyle Skiing Ski Jumping Potential competition schedule (based on Sochi 2014, + adaption of ski freestyle events)

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

7.4.2

Origin of Spectators

During the Olympic Winter Games around 1.7 million spectators are expected to visit the numerous events at the several venues. The experience from similar events shows that the majority of this large amount of spectators will be composed of the population within a catchment area of about 200 km

4% 4%

around the venues. The population in

Lvi viv

46%

Lviv, the Oblast Lviv and the neighbour-

10%

Lviv-Ice Zone 21%

ing oblasts as well as the population of the neighbouring countries within this catchment area offers a large poten-

11%

tial for this spectator amount. Visitors from more remote places and countries are usually entering the region via the Stryi

Truskav vets

Tysovets-Snow Zone Tysovets

73%

Skole e

airport as day trippers or stay overnight. In this case the origins of these spectators are allocated to the airport or hotels within the distribution model. At the current state, the regional distribution of the spectatorsâ&#x20AC;&#x2DC; origin can only

26%

be assessed very roughly. Estimates

Slavske

are based on the potentials and catchments according to population density taking into account settlement struc-

Volovets

tures and administrative boundaries.

Tysovets Skole e

67% Slavske

Volovets-Alpine Arena

Volovets

32%

Assumption on spatial distribution of spectatorsâ&#x20AC;&#x2DC; origin

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

7.4.3

Peak Loads

55.000

Spectators Lviv Ice Zone egress ofstündl. spectators [pax/h] Ganglinie Abfluss [Pax/h] Lviv Ice incl. ZoneBob+Aerials Eis-Park

access ofstündl. spectators [pax/h] Ganglinie Zufluss [Pax/h] Lviv Ice incl. ZoneBob+Aerials Eis-Park

max. pro hour Stunde max.Anwesenheit attendance per Eis-Park Lviv Ice incl. ZoneBob + Aerial

50.000

47.420

45.000 40.000 35.000 30.000 25.000

Max. Access /h: 21,000

20.000

21.000

15.000 10.000 5.000 0 -5.000 -10.000 -13.760

-15.000 5 000

day 0

Lviv Ice Zone: model of spectators‘ traffic demand profile Spectators Tysovets Snow Zone 55.000

access ofstündl. spectators [pax/h] Ganglinie Zufluss [Pax/h] Tysovets Snow Zone Tysovets

max.Anwesenheit attendance per max. pro hour Stunde Tysovets Snow Zone Tysovets

50.000

The

egress ofstündl. spectators [pax/h] Ganglinie Abfluss [Pax/h] Tysovets Snow Zone Tysovets

40.950

model

allocates

event. These timelines vary according

40.000 35.000

to influencing aspects such as time of

30.000 25.000 20.000

Max. Access/ h: 17,490

beginning (e.g. early start = shorter access period/ early end = delayed

17.490

15.000 10.000

egress period/ location of a city event

5.000

= earlier access and delayed egress/

0 -5.000

climatic impact at outdoor venues =

-10.000 -10.780

-15.000 5 000

transportation

access and egress timelines to every

45.000

day 0

Tysovets Snow Zone: model of spectators‘ traffic demand profile

egress/ long duration of a competition = partially access after beginning of

Spectators Volovets Alpine Arena 55.000 max. prohour Stunde max.Anwesenheit attendance per Volovets Volovets Alpine Arena

50.000

cold ambient = later access and earlier

event.)

egress of stündl. spectators [pax/h] Ganglinie Abfluss [Pax/h] Volovets Alpine Arena Volovets

Ganglinie access ofstündl. spectators Zufluss [pax/h] [Pax/h] Volovets Volovets Alpine Arena

45.000

Based on the Sochi 2014 competition

40.000 35.000

schedule and the IOC requirements

30.000

for competition venue capacities, peak

25.000 20.000

18.000

loads for access and egress periods as

15.000 Max. Access/ h: 10,800

10.000

10.800

5.000

well as amounts of the spectators‘ simultaneous attendance were calculated

as shown in the models aside. This cal-

-5.000 -6.840

-10.000 16

culation is a method to very basic cal-

Volovets Alpine Arena: model of spectators‘ traffic demand profile

culation of peak-hour and peak-day

-15.000 5 000

day 0

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

demands. Still, there are many factors that - in a future process - may influence this data. The competition schedule is likely to experience changes, further events may be included, etc. On the other hand, this model is currently assuming 100% sold tickets and therefore a maximum of spectator demand.

7.5 Transportation Concept 7.5.1 General concept I Site Plan I Curling (4.000 spectateurs)

9.1.3

The

transportation

concept

basi-

cally differentiates between two user groups: accredited guests on the one hand, and spectators on the other.

LVIV

The main requirement of the accredited guests is swift and comfortable transportation, especially between the

competition venues, the training facili1

Dedicated lanes

Lviv-Olympic Park

Restricted access areas

Dedicated lane network Lviv Ice Hockey

Airport

Biathlon

Luge

Athletes' Accommodation

Bobsleigh

Nordic Combined

International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Existing infrastructure, permanent works required

to be put in place on selected road cor-

Planned permanent infrastructure (irrespective of the Games)

Cross-Country Skiing

Short Track Speed Skating

Main Hotel Area

Curling

Skeleton

Main Press Centre (MPC)

Figure Skating

Ski Jumping

Medal Ceremonies

Freestyle (Aerials)

Snowboard (SBX)

Media Village

Freestyle (Moguls)

Snowboard (PGS)

Opening & Closing Ceremonies

Freestyle (Ski-Halfpipe)

Snowboard (Halfpipe)

Olympic Family Hotel

Freestyle (Slopestyle)

Snowboard (Slopestyle)

Olympic Village

Freestyle (Ski Cross)

Speed Skating

Railway Station

ridors between the Olympic Park and

Additional permanent infrastructure (Games dependent) Temporary venues required for the Olympic Winter Games 0

1 km

5 km

short journey times for this user group, a system of dedicated lanes will have

Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required

Alpine Skiing

ties and the Olympic Park. To ensure

the various venues. This system would enable the athletes and officials to

Lvi L viiv

reach their individual destinations un-

Snow Park Media Centre

Lviv-Ice Zone

hampered by the other traffic. The dedicated lanes system would include a main corridor on the highway M06 connecting the Lviv Ice Zone with the Tysovets Snow Zone and the Volovets Alpine Arena. Furthermore there

Str t yi y

are several routes within Lviv which

T ska Tru s vet ets et s

connect all relevant venues with the

Tysovets-Snow Zone

Olympic Park. Parts of the dedicated lane network can also be used by

Tysove Tys ov ts ove s Skole Sko S le

shuttle buses and other special bus

Iva vanova n Franki Fr k vsk k

services. The spectators would primar-

S vsk Sla vske e

ily use public transportation to get to Dedicated lanes

Volovets-Alpine Arena

Restricted access areas

Volove Vol ov ts ove t

the events. All venues would have restricted access zones and parking for private cars would not be allowed at any of the venues. Nevertheless, modal split assumptions are reflecting a share

Regional dedicated lane network

Alpine Skiing

Ice Hockey

Airport

Biathlon

Luge

Athletes' Accomodation

Bobsleigh

ProProjekt

Nordic Combined

AS&P

April 2012

Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required Existing infrastructure, permanent works required

International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Planned permanent infrastructure (irrespective of the Games)

Cross-Country Skiing

Short Track Speed Skating

Main Hotel Area

Curling

Skeleton

Main Press Centre (MPC)

Additional permanent infrastructure (Games dependent)

Figure Skating

Ski Jumping

Medal Ceremonies

Temporary venues required

of private vehicle users who are meant to use P+R facilities and shuttle services. The modal split of the spectator traffic was determined reflecting both, proven variables and target shares. The targets are based on the assumption that restrictive measures, such as traffic and parking management, traffic information and ticketing will influence travel behaviour. Due to the large number of spectators, all available public transport modes have to be taken into consideration. The aim is to produce a large share of rail and bus users. Major events in the past have shown that coach shares of up to 20-25% are quite feasible. The rail share depends very much on service supply, frequencies and catchment areas of the rail system. For long-distance traffic, a share of 15% to 20% reflects a conservative approach. However, the rail share for both, the access to Tysovets and Volovets, as well as the tram share within Lviv, are set according to the capacity of the systems in place. Due to the limited capacities, the major transportation mode for spectators would be buses. In direct proximity of the entrances, all the venues will be served by several bus terminals. The size of these bus terminals would be based on the expected number and arrival time of the spectators, and will be serviced by various lines. Many buses will operate as special services from various starting points (e.g. hotel areas, airport, rail stations, P+R areas, etc.) and take various routes to the venues.

7.5.2 Lviv Ice Zone In the Lviv Ice Zone all venues except the Sliding Centre are accessed by tram and trolley-bus lines. All venues can be reached by regular and special bus services. Therefore, various bus terminals would be located in central areas of the Olympic Park and in close proximity of the entrances of the three venues outside the Park. In addition, a large number of Marshrutka (mini-buses) and taxis would transport spectators to the venues. Given their flexibility, these traffic modes will play a considerable role. For this reason appropriately sized drop-off areas will be set up near the entrances of the venues. Coach parking areas should be created in direct vicinity of Lviv Olympic Park, while private cars Transport mode

max. passengers related to event

rail (Lviv - Skole - Volovets) tram public bus (seating) public bus (standing) public bus (total) shuttle-bus urban shuttle-bus nonurban coach marshrutka private car taxi

frequency per peak hour and line

capacity per peak hour and line

580

95%

2.755

170

90%

1.836

90%

540

90%

756

120

90%

1.296

120

100%

2,5

100%

2,0

100%

Capacities of transport modes

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

should not have access to the area. Instead, selected existing and temporary P+R facilities for a total amount of 5,500 cars have to be provided. The location of the proposed areas resembles the P+R-concept for the UEFA Euro 2012. Local spectators and hotel guests would use the enhanced public transport to access the Olympic Park and the other venues, while day trippers arriving at the airport and the central railway station 9.1.3

I Site Plan I Curling (4.000 spectateurs)

would be provided with dedicated shuttle buses. Taking into account the planned upgrade of Lviv International Airport and the implementation of a temporary tournament terminal, around 10% of the spectators

LVIV

could be day-trippers arriving via the airport. The estimates of the modal split during peak hour (max. peak hour during the

P+R areas

Lviv-Olympic Park

Coach parking areas Car routing guidance

9.1.3

Alpine Skiing

Ice Hockey

I Site Plan I Curling (4.000 spectateurs)

Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required

Airport

Lviv Ice Zone: Spectator parking Biathlon

Luge

Athletes' Accommodation

Bobsleigh

Nordic Combined

International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Short Track Speed Skating

Main Hotel Area

Skeleton

Main Press Centre (MPC)

Figure Skating

Ski Jumping

Medal Ceremonies

Freestyle (Aerials)

Snowboard (SBX)

Media Village

Freestyle (Moguls)

Snowboard (PGS)

Opening & Closing Ceremonies

Freestyle (Ski-Halfpipe)

Snowboard (Halfpipe)

Olympic Family Hotel

Freestyle (Slopestyle)

Snowboard (Slopestyle)

Olympic Village

Freestyle (Ski Cross)

Speed Skating

Railway Station

Additional permanent infrastructure (Games dependent)

structure, administrative boundaries).

Temporary venues required for the Olympic Winter Games 0

1 km

5 km

ties of the transportation systems and tator potentials (population, settlement

Planned permanent infrastructure (irrespective of the Games)

Curling

tournament are based on the capacia very rough assessment of the spec-

Existing infrastructure, permanent works required

Cross-Country Skiing

whole competition) and peak day of the

Main upgrade potentials of the infrastructure, especially the extension of

LVIV

the tram system with direct access to

Snow Park Media Centre

the planned Olympic Park and the realisation of the southern bypass road connecting the airport with the planned 2

Olympic Park are taken into consideraTrolley bus lines 1

Tram lines

Lviv-Olympic Park

9.1.3

Planned tram lines

Alpine Skiing

Ice Hockey

Airport

Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required

Biathlon

Luge

Athletes' Accommodation

Existing infrastructure, permanent works required

Bobsleigh

Nordic Combined

International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Cross-Country Skiing

Short Track Speed Skating

Main Hotel Area

Curling

Skeleton

Main Press Centre (MPC)

Figure Skating

Ski Jumping

Medal Ceremonies

Freestyle (Aerials)

Snowboard (SBX)

Media Village

I Site Plan I Curling (4.000 spectateurs)

Lviv Ice Zone: Public transport network

tion. Furthermore, comprehensive road works like the implementation of the planned inner ring road are necessary to enable the traffic flow within the city.

Planned permanent infrastructure (irrespective of the Games) Additional permanent infrastructure (Games dependent) Temporary venues required for the Olympic Winter Games

Freestyle (Moguls)

Snowboard (PGS)

Opening & Closing Ceremonies

Freestyle (Ski-Halfpipe)

Snowboard (Halfpipe)

Olympic Family Hotel

Freestyle (Slopestyle)

Snowboard (Slopestyle)

Olympic Village

Freestyle (Ski Cross)

Speed Skating

Railway Station

1 km

5 km

LVIV

Snow Park Media Centre

Lviv outer ring road 1

Highway M06

Lviv-Olympic Park

Planned road connections

Alpine Skiing

Ice Hockey

Airport

Biathlon

Luge

Athletes' Accommodation

Bobsleigh

Nordic Combined

International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Cross-Country Skiing

Short Track Speed Skating

Main Hotel Area

Curling

Skeleton

Main Press Centre (MPC)

Figure Skating

Ski Jumping

Medal Ceremonies

Freestyle (Aerials)

Snowboard (SBX)

Media Village

Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required

Lviv Ice Zone: Major improvements of road network Existing infrastructure,

permanent works required

Freestyle (Moguls)

Snowboard (PGS)

Opening & Closing Ceremonies

Freestyle (Ski-Halfpipe)

Snowboard (Halfpipe)

Olympic Family Hotel

Freestyle (Slopestyle)

Snowboard (Slopestyle)

ProProjekt Freestyle (Ski Cross) SpeedAS&P Skating

Olympic Village

April Railway 2012 Station Snow Park Media Centre

Planned permanent infrastructure (irrespective of the Games) Additional permanent infrastructure (Games dependent) Temporary venues required for the Olympic Winter Games 0

1 km

5 km

7.5.3 Tysovets Snow Zone

Modal Split Lviv-Ice Zone

The Tysovets Snow Zone would be subject to road closures

21.000 spectators

Peak hour Internal trafic

and restricted access areas. Only accredited guests, specta-

[%]

[spec]

[veh]

Tram

17%

3.672

tor buses and shuttles, as well as emergency vehicles and

Bus

12%

2.592

Coach

18%

3.828

and residents would be allowed to enter the area. For this

P+R shuttle

26%

5 423 5.423

Rail shuttle

1.916

Airport shuttle

spaces, would have to be installed in close proximity of the

1.890

Marshrutka

1.260

158

M06 intersection with the Thysovets access road. Coach

Taxi

420

210

reason, P+R facilities providing a total of 9,000 parking

travellers would experience the comfort to have a seamless

Modal Split Lviv-Ice Zone Peak hour

21.000 spectators

Regional Access North [%] Railway Coach / Regional Bus Private Car Total

[spec]

North-East [veh]

[%]

[spec]

South-East [veh]

[%]

[spec]

South [veh]

[%]

[spec]

South-West [veh]

[%]

[spec]

North-West [veh]

[%]

[spec]

[veh]

30%

601

30%

1.315

40%

358

30%

601

40%

891

30%

1.315

40%

334

40%

329

60%

538

215

40%

802

321

60%

1.337

535

40%

1.753

701

60%

501

200

60%

493

197

896

10%

2.004

11%

2.228

21%

4.382

834

822

[%]

South [spec]

Modal Split Lviv-Ice Zone Peak Day

47.500 spectators

Regional Access North [spec]

[%] Railway Coach / Regional Bus Private Car Total

[veh]

[%]

North-East [spec] [veh]

[%]

South-East [spec] [veh]

[veh]

[%]

South-West [spec] [veh]

[%]

North-West [spec] [veh]

30%

1.360

30%

2.973

40%

811

30%

1.360

40%

2.016

30%

2.973

40%

755

40%

744

60%

1.216

486

40%

1.813

725

60%

3.024

1.210

40%

3.964

1.586

60%

1.132

453

60%

1.115

446

2.026

10%

4.534

11%

5.041

21%

9.911

1.887

1.859

Lviv Ice Zone: Modal split assumptions for peak hour and peak day

journey without the need of use shuttle buses due to approx. 270 coach parking spaces that would be realised close to the venues. A rough estimate for the regional distribution of the spectatorsâ&#x20AC;&#x2DC; origin shows, that around 70% would arrive from the North and the rest from the South via railway and the M06 highway. The rail station for Tysovets would probably be in or south of Skole and train passengers would be provided with bus shuttle services to reach the venues. Travel time for the 25 km distance would be around 30 minutes. After the planned modernisation of the double track railway the maximum frequency will be 5 trains per hour and direction with a capacity of 580 passengers per train. Due to the railway capacity constraints, most of the spectators would use several bus services and private cars (P+R facilities). Between Lviv and Tysovets, the M06 highway is currently a two lane road on most of its length, offering an absolutely insufficient capacity. Due to the high traffic volumes during peak hours of up to 2,800 private cars approaching from the North and the fact that this road (between Lviv and south of Skole) is also the main access to the Alpine Arena Volovets, a minimum of two lanes per direction is required, not taking into account basic traffic loads. Furthermore, this corridor is also the access route for all constituent groups, which asks for two more dedicated lanes. In total, an extension of the M06 between Lviv and Tysovets to three lanes

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

per direction is required. Taking into account the post event needs, the design of the road could be two lanes per direction plus a hard shoulder / emergency lane which could serve as a fully functional lane during the tournament. Although these recommended infra-

Lvi L viiv

structure upgrades are likely to meet the peak hour demands during Olympic

Lviv-Ice Zone

Winter Games, traffic loads would reach the capacity of the infrastructure. A fact that increases the risk of accidents and obstacles of traffic flow. This situation is even worsened because the emergency lane is supposed to be used as a fully Str t yi y

functional traffic lane. Due to the lack

T ska Tru s vet ets et s

of redundant road infrastructure, no re-

Tysovets-Snow Zone

routing options would be available. The proposed road design is supposed to

Tysove Tys ysove ys ove ov v ts s Skole Sko S kole lle

meet the calculated tournament traffic

Iva vanova n Franki Fr k vsk k

loads. If significant basic traffic loads

P+R areas

S vsk Sla vske e

are expected additionally, road designs

Coach parking areas Volovets-Alpine Arena

will have to be adapted accordingly.

Restricted access areas

Volove Vol ovets ove

For Snow Zone access from the M06 highway, two new roads are required.

Regional spectator parking concept

One would be a reconstruction of the Lvi L viiv viv

existing access from Kozova and the other one would be the already planned

Lviv-Ice Zone

road entering the area from the North.

Alpine Skiing

Ice Hockey

Airport

Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required

Biathlon

Luge

Athletes' Accomodation

Existing infrastructure, permanent works required

Bobsleigh

Nordic Combined

International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Cross-Country Skiing

Short Track Speed Skating

Main Hotel Area

analyses and feasibility studies for the

Planned permanent infrastructure (irrespective of the Games)

Curling

Skeleton

Main Press Centre (MPC)

Figure Skating

Ski Jumping

Medal Ceremonies

Freestyle (Aerials)

Snowboard (SBX)

Media Village

Freestyle (Moguls)

Snowboard (PGS)

Freestyle (Ski-Halfpipe)

T (Halfpipe) Tru s vet ska ets et s Snowboard

Olympic Family Hotel

Freestyle (Slopestyle)

Snowboard (Slopestyle)

Olympic Village

Str t yi y

Due to the difficult terrain, deeper access roads are required. One of these

Additional permanent infrastructure (Games dependent)

access roads, preferably the northern

Temporary venues required for the Olympic Winter Games

approach, should be dedicated for

Opening & Closing Ceremonies

Speed Skating

50 km

constituent groups only. The second access road should be used for spec-

Railway Station

tator traffic (coaches, shuttle buses)

Snow Park Media Centre

and residents. The expected number of

Tysovets-Snow Zone Freestyle (Ski Cross)

10 km

Tysove Tys ov ts ove s

bus trips (coaches, shuttle buses from

Skole Sko S le

train stations and P+R facilities) during

Iva vanova n Franki Fr k vsk k S vsk Sla vske e

Volovets-Alpine Arena

Lviv outer ring road

the maximum tournament peak hour is

Highway M06

350 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; 400 (around 17,500 spectators).

Planned road connections

Therefore, efficient bus terminals have

Volove Vol ov ts ove

to be implemented near the venues.

Major improvements of regional road network

Alpine Skiing Biathlon ProProjekt

Ice Hockey

AS&PLuge April 2012

Airport

Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required

Athletes' Accomodation

Existing infrastructure, permanent works required

Bobsleigh

Nordic Combined

International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Cross-Country Skiing

Short Track Speed Skating

Main Hotel Area

Curling

Skeleton

Main Press Centre (MPC)

Planned permanent infrastructure (irrespective of the Games) Additional permanent infrastructure

During the maximum peak hour for the

Lvi L viiv

Snow Zone Tysovets, no event will take place in Volovets. Therefore, the follow-

Lviv-Ice Zone

ing peak hour estimations are related to the spectator traffic to Tysovets only. Estimates of the modal split for the maximum tournament peak hour and the peak day are based on a maximum Str t yi y

share of train users. Furthermore, the

T ska Tru s vet ets et s

estimates for spectators using bus ser-

Tysovets-Snow Zone

vices (coaches and direct bus shuttles from several origins like Lviv, Stryi

Tysove Tys ov ts ove s Skole Sko S le

etc.) are relatively high, but this arrival

Iva vanova n Franki Fr k vsk k

mode is the one that offers the highest

S vsk Sla vske e

comfort (direct access to the venue, no Railway station

Volovets-Alpine Arena

P+R shuttle required). This approach

Rail corridor

has to be supported by corresponding

Volove Vol ov ts ove

ticketing structures, information campaigns etc.

Regional public transport network

7.5.4 Volovets Alpine Arena

Modal Split Tysovets-Snow Zone Peak hour

17.500 spectators

Alpine Skiing

Ice Hockey

Biathlon

Luge

North [spec] [ ]

[%] Nordic Combined Total share of spectators 73% 12.711 Cross-Country Skiing Short Track Speed Skating Railway 20% 2.542 Curling Coach / Regional Bus Skeleton 35% 4.449 Private Car 45% 5.720 5 720 Figure Skating Ski Jumping P+R Shuttles Bobsleigh

Freestyle (Aerials)

Snowboard (SBX)

Like the Tysovets Snow Zone, the Vo-

Existing infrastructure, no permanent works required

Airport

[%]

South [spec] [ ]

26%

4.613

Athletes' Accomodation

[veh] [ h]

International Broadcast Centre (IBC) Main Hotel Area

1.384

2 2.998 998

1 1.199 199

46 Media Village

Tysovets Snow Zone: Modal split assumptions (Peak Hour)

lovets Alpine Arena would be subject

Existing infrastructure, permanent works required

to road closures and restricted area

Planned permanent infrastructure (irrespective of the Games)

231

Main 89 Press Centre 30%(MPC)

2 2.288 288Ceremonies 65% Medal

[veh] [ h]

access that allows access to accred-

Additional permanent infrastructure (Games dependent)

ited guests, spectator buses, coaches,

Temporary venues required for the Olympic Winter Games

emergency vehicles and residents ex-

10 km

50 km

clusively. Park and ride facilities, pro-

Freestyle (Moguls)

Snowboard (PGS)

Opening & Closing Ceremonies

Freestyle (Ski-Halfpipe)

Snowboard (Halfpipe)

Olympic Family Hotel

Freestyle (Slopestyle)

Snowboard (Slopestyle)

Olympic Village

Freestyle (Ski Cross)

Speed Skating

Railway Station

will have to be installed in close prox-

Snow Park Media Centre

imity of the M06 intersection with the

Modal Split Tysovets-Snow Zone

viding a total of 3,700 parking spaces,

Volovets access road. Spectators using

41.000 spectators

Peak Day

Total share of spectators Railway Coach / Regional Bus Private Car P+R Shuttles

[%]

North [spec] [ ]

[%]

South [spec] [ ]

73% 25%

29.780

26%

10.807

7.445

540

30%

8.934

179

30%

3.242

45%

13 13.401 401

5 5.360 360

65%

7 7.025 025

2 2.810 810

[veh] [ h]

107

Tysovets Snow Zone: Modal split assumptions (Peak Day)

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

[veh] [ h]

bus services from their origin will experience the comfort to have a direct access to the venue without changing the bus. For this purpose, around 130 coach parking spaces will be required adjacent to the venue.

Modal Split

The Volovets railway stations will not

Volovets-Alpine Arena / Tysovets-Snow Zone

Volovets

11.000 spectators

Tysovets

10.000 spectators

Total

21.000 spectators

Total share of spectators Volovets Tysovets Railway Volovets Tysovets Total Coach / Regional Bus Volovets Tysovets Total Private Car Volovets Tysovets Total P+R Shuttles Volovets Tysovets Total

[%]

North [[spec]]

67%

provide direct and close access to the Alpine Arena. So, further shuttle ser-

Peak Hour

vices would be required.

Peak Hour

[%]

South [[spec]]

7.391

32%

3.498

73%

7.263

26%

2.636

20%

1.478

15%

525

15%

1.089

132

12%

2.568

656

35%

2.587

25%

874

35%

2.542

30%

791

24%

5.129

103

1.665

45%

3.326

1.330

60%

2.099

839

50%

3.632

1.453

65%

1.713

685

33%

6.958

2.783

18%

3.812

1.525

[ h] [veh]

The Volovets Alpine Arena would have two roadside approaches. The first one connects the M06 south of Skole via Slavske to Volovets. This access route should be used by bus services from the North and the constituent groups (ded-

icated lane). Having legacy in mind, the design of the road should be one lane per direction plus a hard shoulder / emergency lane which serves as a fully functional lane during the tournament. The second road access would be via the T0718 and should serve the spectator traffic from the South and the P+R shuttles.

Modal Split Volovets-Alpine Arena 18.000 spectators

Peak Day

Total share of spectators Railway Coach / Regional Bus Private Car P+R Shuttles

[%]

North [spec] [ ]

[%]

South [spec] [ ]

67% 25%

12.095

32%

5.724

3.024

15%

859

35%

4.233

25%

1.431

40%

4.838 4 838

1 1.935 935

60%

3 3.434 434

1 1.374 374

[veh] [ h]

Volovets Alpine Arena: Modal split assumptions

[veh] [ h]

In total, around 220 bus trips (coaches, shuttle buses from train stations and P+R facilities) are expected during the maximum tournament peak hour (around 11,000 spectators). Efficient bus terminals have to be implemented near the venues.

During the maximum peak hour for the Alpine Arena Volovets there would be also some events in Tysovets. The peak hour for Volovets is likely to coincide with the arrival peak hour to both mountain venue zones (around 21,000 spectators in total). Therefore, the modal split estimates for the Volovets peak hour take into consideration the contemporaneous spectator traffic to Tysovets.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

7.6 Proposed Measures Major measures regarding the transportation infrastructure are shown in the following table.

Public Infrastructure Region

tracks/ dir.

200

Upgrade of existing rail connection Lviv-Skole-Volovets Lviv-Skole Skole-Volovets

MM â&#x201A;Ź

111

Lviv Upgrade of tram lines

150

Snow Zones Skole/ Tysovets rail stadion upgrade

Volovets rail station upgrade

total

360

Road Infrastructure km

tracks/ dir.

MM â&#x201A;Ź

100

2+1

500

Skole-Exit Tysovets

2+1

100

Skole-Slavske

1+1

120

Slavske-Volovets

1+1

120

Region Lviv-Skole

Lviv 200

Infrastructure Lviv upgrade Inner ring road

New southern bypass

Snow Zones M06-Tysovets (south)

1+1

M06-Tysovets (north)

1+1

100

M06-Volovets

1+1

Local road infrastructure Tysovets

Local road infrastructure Volovets

total

1,265

Major measures on transportation network

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

Beyond these measures, additional costs for temporary measures and operational aspects as follows, would arise. > Construction of P+R facilities > Lviv: 5,500 parking spaces > Tysovets: 9,000 parking spaces > Volovets: 3,700 parking spaces > Coach parking spaces at each competition zone > Lviv: 200 coach parking spaces > Tysovets: 270 coach parking spaces > Volovets: 130 coach parking spaces > Bus terminals at the main transfer hubs (airport, railway stations, etc.) and the competition

venues > Installation of an Olympic Lane network > Implementation of a traffic management strategy including guidance and information

systems > Maintenance, modernisation and temporary extension of rolling stock > Temporary extension of the bus fleet > Free public transport use for ticket holders (combined ticket) > Maintenance, modernisation and temporary extension of rolling stock > Temporary extension of the bus fleet > Free public transport use for ticket holders (combined ticket)

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

8. Accommodation

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

8. Accommodation When it comes to accommodation for an Olympic Winter Games two different kinds of accommodation are needed. First, the IOC requires a total 23,300 guaranteed rooms in 2 to 5* classified Hotels for the Olympic Family (IOC, IFs, NOCs, Host OCOG, Future OCOG, Marketing Partner, Media). On top of these 23,300 rooms, which have to be guaranteed for a fixed price and period of time already during the bid phase, accommodation for fans and spectators has to be added. There is no official requirement for the number of rooms needed, however based upon the experiences of past Host City elections, a minimum of around 20,000 additional rooms for fans should be provided.

8.1 Olympic Family Accommodation Only rooms in a 50-km radius around the Olympic Park (Village) and all rooms in a 10-km radius around different venue zones may be counted. Consequently all rooms to be developed have to be located in these radii.

Type of accommodation

Lviv

Tysovets

Volovets

Total

existing rooms (2012) in 2-5* Hotels

1,960

325

Additional rooms required in 2-5* Hotels

10,240

200

100

10,540

Additional rooms required for media accommodation

6,475

3,500

500

10,475

16,715

3,700

600

21,015

19,000

3,700

600

23,300

Planned rooms (current projects) 2-5* Hotels

total rooms required (to be developed until 2022) total

Overview of existing, planned and required accommodation types suitable for the Olympic Family

Lviv The city of Lviv is known nationally and internationally for its historical attractions and well preserved monuments. In addition, it is also visited for musical and cultural events. The Cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Hotel market counts approximately 2,000 rooms in the 2-5* category, none of these rooms are branded and the large majority is in the 3-4* category. It is planned to accommodate a maximum of the Olympic Family in Lviv, as the need for the hotel

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

rooms to be developed is given. In total about 10,500 hotel rooms are to be developed just to accommodate the needs of the Olympic Family. The bulk of these rooms are to be developed on Lviv and its surroundings. As recent studies have shown there is an optimistic scenario in which the Hotel market in the City of Lviv will count about 3,500 hotel rooms until 2018. The perspective of Olympic Winter Games in the City and the region could enhance that growth even further. As the analysis of the existing 5* category Hotels has shown, none of the existing can be used as the official IOC Hotel. For the IOC Hotel, at least 950-rooms in one or more 5* Hotel(s) in a closed precinct and in the vicinity to a maximum of venues are needed. It is therefore strongly recommended to build a new 5* Hotel in the planned Olympic Park, this guarantees excellent accessibility and short travel times. Such a development makes also sense in terms of legacy, as the number of rooms in the 5* category is rather low and as the hotel will be located in immediate proximity to the planned trade fair area and can be marketed after the Games as a conference hotel.

Main Media Village In Lviv an estimated 6,500 Media representatives have to be accommodated. Therefore a Media Village is proposed in the northern part of the Lviv Ice Zone adjacent to the Olympic Village and in within walking distance of the IBC/MPC. The large majority of these Rooms have to be in the 2 to 3* category and can be developed in lower quality as the adjacent Olympic Village. The Media Village could possibly be developed within a public housing programme for young families and used as housing units after the Games.

Tysovets and Volovets In both, Tysovets and Volovets Hotel rooms in the 2-5* category are nonexistent. As the bulk of the Olympic Family will be accommodated in Lviv only 200 and respectively 100 rooms in the 2-5* category would be necessary, mostly for technical officials and other International Federations. As for the Media, 3,500 rooms will be required in Tysovets and 500 in Volovets, their location should favour short travel times to the venues. As planned at the current stage, the Snow Media Village in Tysovets is centrally located in the Tysovets Snow Zone. However, as the post-use of these 3,500 rooms remains uncertain, it is recommended to reassess the location at a later planning stage, possibly looking for a distribution of the rooms to several locations in a distance of up to 30 km to Tysovets.

8.2 Fan Accommodation As mentioned above at least about 20,000 additional rooms would have to be provided to accommodate the expected spectators. These would be divided as follows between the 3 areas: 16,000 in Lviv and surroundings, around 1,740 in Tysovets and 1,620 in Volovets (refer to next page). In contrast to the 23,300 rooms required for the Olympic Family, the accommodation for fans is

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

not limited to a certain category nor bound to a specific distance around the venues. Alternative accommodation refers to various types of accommodation that are not traditional hotels, such as Condominiums and Apartments, School and University Dormitories, Youth, Church and Military Camps and Mobile or Temporary Accommodation and is accepted by the IOC. In total almost 3,500 rooms would have to be developed to be able to host the expected number of spectators, thereof 2,000 rooms in 2-5* Hotels and 1,500 in alternative accommodation.

Type of accommodation existing rooms (2012) in alternative accommmodation* Additional rooms required in 2-5* Hotels Additional rooms required in alternative accommodation* total rooms required (to be developed until 2022) total

Lviv

Tysovets

Volovets

Total

15,002

236

625

15,863

1,000

500

2,000

1,000

500

1,500

1,000

1,500

1,000

3,500

16,002

1,736

1,625

19,363

* Alternative Accommodation are considered as unclassified rooms like dormitories, boarding houses, resorts, etc. Overview of existing, planned and required accommodation types suitable for the Olympic Family

Lviv In and around Lviv about 15,000 rooms in alternative accommodation can be found. This is due to the large number of students, health resorts and boarding houses available. The number of beds can be easily considered twice as high as the number of rooms, so there should be no shortage of alternative accommodation for fans. Nevertheless it is recommended to develop about 1,000 additional Hotel rooms in 2-5 star categories in and around Lviv to be able to offer spectators a variety of choice for their accommodation and to serve as a buffer in case not all of the required hotel rooms will be guaranteed.

Tysovets and Volovets In the Tysovets Snow Zone and the Alpine Arena of Volovets about 240 and 630 rooms respectively exist in alternative accommodation. To be able to provide the projected 1,500 rooms in the two cities, roughly 1,000 and 500 additional rooms in alternative accommodation have to be developed in Tysovets and Volovets.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

8.3 Accommodation Strategy Lviv and its surroundings, Tysovets and Volovets have all a great future economic potential in terms of tourism. However, the regionâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s hotel development should be in line with its tourism strategy. In order to support the suggested hotel market development appropriate strategies should be adapted to cater for a sustainable growth in the tourism industry. There is no doubt that developing a total number of about 12,000 hotel rooms is a challenge, but not one which cannot be mastered, especially given the overall quality Hotel undersupply in the region. It is very much suggested that the city of Lviv and the region apply all resources and strategies available to convert the region into one of the major tourism destinations within Ukraine. The absence of international standards is another important point and the presence of international chains would be an opportunity to raise the overall hotel standards in the region. Certainly, the Euro 2012 will put Lviv more in international spotlight and thus attracting more tourists. The required rooms for Media accommodation in Lviv should be developed to cater for future housing needs in the City. Regarding the other Media Accommodation in Tysovets, it is recommended to consider a distribution of the required rooms to several locations in proximity to Tysovets to ensure a reasonable legacy. Volovets is to be developed as skiing resort with a projected number of up to 15,000 beds, thus easily serving the possible demand of accommodation. In total, existing and additionally required rooms would add up to approximately 43,000 rooms, a number which has been considered satisfactory by the IOC in past Host City elections.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

9. Finance

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

9. Finance The IOC distinguishes between three different budgets: > Bid budget (Budget of the bidding process) > OCOG budget (Operational budget for the Games) > Non-OCOG budget (Budget for long-term developments in the city/ region)

9.1 Bid Budget Based upon the bid budgets of the 2018 Candidate Cities as well as Sotchi 2014, a rough estimation for Lviv 2022 has been made, including all funds required by the Bid Committee during the entire bidding process. It has been taken into account that the official budgets of the named bidders do not reflect the actual spending of the bids, since they were strategic figure that have been developed at a very early stage in the bidding process. Furthermore, multiple bidders, like Sotchi and PyeongChang, could use their developed plans and consequently need less resources during their second or third bid. Having taken into account that bid budgets have been constantly rising with each bid term and budgets have nearly doubled in the past 10 years, an budget of EUR 40.5 MM has been projected for a potential Lviv 2022 bid, already starting with the Pre-Bid Phase from May 2012 until the final IOC decision in September 2015. However, value in kind services provided by public or private partners are not yet included. Depending on their involvement, respectively commitment, a combined total (inofficial) budget of approx. EUR 60 MM could be estimated.

Pre-Bid-Phase

AC-Phase

CC-Phase

Sum

1. Communication and Events

2,00

6,00

12,00

20,00

2. Planning and Bid

2,00

4,00

10,00

1,00

4,00

5,00

10,00

0,12

0,38

0,50

5,00

14,1

21,4

40,5

Documentation 3. Staff and Administration 4. IOC Fee totAL eUr (MM) totAL USD* (MM)

53,1

*1 EUR = 1,31 USD Estimated Bid Budget (EUR 2012)

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

The main cost drivers in the bid budget are as follows:

Communication and Events > Marketing- and communication activities of the Bid Committee in cooperation with the NOC

(Fairs, congresses, sport events etc.) > National and international presentations (meetings of the continental Olympic Committees,

international sport fairs like SportAccord, promotion on major national sport events etc.) > National

and

international

(Internet,

electronical

media,

social

networks,

media-cooperationâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s) > Visit of the Evaluation Commission, technical and final presentation

Planning and Bid Documentation > Development of a strategic bid concept, with the support of experienced international

consultants > Development of the various bid modules as required by the IOC, for example > Design and planning of all infrastructures necessary for the Games: Venues, Olympic

Villages, Media Accommodation, Media Centre, etc., > Design and planning of an transport infrastructure concept for all client groups an visitors, > Development of an accommodation concept > Initial environmental impact assessments studies, > Development of a comprehensive data supporting the build-up of each budgetary caption

of the OCOG budget, > Etc. > Editorial set up of the bid book texts as well as the layout and the printing of the bid books

Staff and Administration > Set up of a Bid Committee made up of employees on different levels to carry out the organi-

sational work as well as the work with regards to content > Organisational structure of such a committee is usually as follows: president, CEO, manag-

ing director, heads of departments (marketing, communication, sport, international relation finance and planning processes) staff > Additionally, expenditures for travel and rental services as well as other costs for office

equipment, telecommunication, fleet, IT and other facilities IOC Fee > Refundable candidature acceptance fee to the IOC of USD 150,000 > Non-refundable candidature fee to the IOC of USD 500,000

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

9.2 OCOG Budget The OCOG budget contains all expenditures for Games operations and organisation.

Expenditure Estimation As basis for the OCOG budget estimation - again - respective details from past 2014 and 2018 Candidate Cities have been evaluated. Especially concept unspecific budget positions like licensing, lotteries, donations, ect. could provide a solid benchmark for Lviv 2022. Furthermore, concept specific positions such as transportation, overlay costs or venue operations for the Olympic Village, media facilities (IBC/ MPC, sub media centre, etc.) and all competition and non-competition venues have been based on the proposed preliminary Lviv 2022 Master Plan. Together with the IT and telecommunications infrastructure, the costs for the venue fit-out and operation add up to almost 50% of the entire OCOG expenditure. The third biggest position, human resources, make up for almost 10 %. Still, it has to be taken into consideration that the workforce will be supported by a significant number of Volunteers (the OCOG only pays for board and lodge) and several public authorities providing their assistance free of charge. Aside from administrative support, this could for example include general public safety in the Host City, the medical and emergency services, transport services, operational costs for environmental management services. As these services were not subject to this study, further estimations have not been carried out. The below shown budgets do also already include the operational costs for the Paralympics. Expenditure

Sum

Sport Facilities, Villages, Non-Comp. Venues

360

Workforce

110

Information System, Telecommunications & other Technologies, Internet

230

Ceremonies & Culture

Medical services, Security

Catering

Transport

Paralympic Games

Advertising & Promotion, Pre-Olympic events

Administration

Other

200

totAL eUr (MM)

1,270

totAL USD* (MM)

1,670

*1 EUR = 1,31 USD Estimated OCOG Expenditures (EUR 2012)

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

Revenue Projection All directly OCOG related operational costs of the Games should fully be covered by OCOG revenues. Therefore, the IOC does not only requests a projection on the OCOG expenditure budget, but also a breakdown of the potential revenue positions. Revenues

Sum

IOC Contribution, TOP Sponsorship

400

Local Sponsorship, Official Suppliers

350

Ticket Sales

170

Licensing, Lotteries, Donations

Disposal of assets

Government Subsidies

110

Other

150

totAL eUr (MM)

1,270

totAL USD* (MM)

1,670

*1 EUR = 1,31 USD Estimated OCOG Revenues (EUR 2012)

The most important revenue for the OCOG would be the IOC contribution (sale of radio and TV rights) as well as the revenues from the TOP Sponsorship-Programme and ticket sales. The positions on local sponsorship and official suppliers strongly depend on the local market as well as the relationship and connections of politics, sports and the national economy. Since this position could be rather variable, while other revenues may differ due to market changes in 2022, too, the IOC requires guarantees by the Candidate City to cover any potential shortfalls of the operational budget. Since revenues of the Paralympics will - most probably - not be cost-covering, the IOC requests an additional guarantee stating that all costs for this additional event are included in the OCOG budget.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

9.3 Non-OCOG Budget In general, the infrastructure investments required for the Games make up the lions share of the Olympic budget. This so called OCOG budget comprises all Games-related capital investments for new infrastructures or required upgrades of existing infrastructures. Depending on the specific market framework in the Ukraine and the Lviv region, major parts would publicly funded, while individual project would have the potential to be developed by private investors. Since multi-billion EUR investments would be required, it is important to emphasize at this point again, that the planned developments should be in line with the cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s long-term strategy and legacy plans. There are further more even several positive examples of Olympic bids being used as catalysts for urban developments. The Games related infrastructure investments for the Olympic Winter Games Lviv 2022 have been estimated with approx. EUR 4.7 billion (2012 figures). Not included are the capital investments for infrastructures for power/ electricity, telecommunications, security, medical, etc.. Based on published information on hand from Sotchi 2014 and PyeongChang 2018, approx. EUR 2 billion have additionally been invested in this field, which should provide a rough benchmark for Lviv 2022.

Transport Airport

Sum

Source of Finance

1,770

Public

710

Public

100

Roads

1,310

Railways

360

Competition venues Lviv Ice Zone

390

Tysovets Snow Zone

120

Volovets Alpine Arena

200

Non-competition venues

1,472

Olympic Villages

365

Public/Private

Media Accommodation

738

Public/Private

IOC Hotel

160

Private

IBC/MPC

210

Public

Accommodation

833

Private

Other

478

Public

totAL eUr (MM)

5,263

totAL USD* (MM)

6,895

*1 EUR = 1,31 USD Estimated Non-OCOG Budget (EUR 2012)

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

Potential Investments for Lviv 2022 The proposed Games concept for the Olympic Winter Games would ask for a fundamental investment in infrastructure measures. The potential Games concept foresees two major venue zones in Lviv and Tysovets and an additionally Alpine Arena in Volovets, which results in a comparably high distance from the Olympic Park to the farthermost venue of approx. 155 km. Due to the strategic and especially geographical constrains, a relocation of the southern Alpine Arena would not be possible. To be internationally competitive and operational viable, a major upgrade of the road and rail connection to ease the traffic flow of all user groups and to shorten travel times would therefore be essential. Against this background it appears reasonable that the biggest position of approx. EUR 1.8 billion has been estimated for transport measures. Thereof EUR 1.42 billion would amount for the improvement of the road and train infrastructure from Lviv to Tysovets and Volovets. These investments would again promote the long-term development of the mountain regionas as tourist destinations. A detailed description of the different measures is provided in the chapter 7 Transport. EUR 710 million have been estimated for the construction of the competition venues. Since the area of the Alpine Arena has not yet neither been developed to host international alpine competition smaller scale national events, it would require fundamental construction and earth works, estimated with approx. EUR 200 million, to make this area suitable to host Olympic Winter Games. Another big cost position of approx. EUR 395 million (EUR 350 MM permanent infrastructure/ EUR 45 MM temporary infrastructure) would have to be considered for the realisation of all ice venues in Lviv (Ice track, ice hockey, speed skating, figure skating/ shorttrack, etc.). Further, for the IBC (International Broadcasting Center) and the MPC (Main Press Center) the development of a trade fair, with an estimated investment of approx. EUR 215 million (including the curling venue) would be proposed. The major costs for the non-competition venues will result in the lack of accommodation infrastructure in order to accommodate the Olympic Family as well as regular fans. To meet the official IOC requirements of 23,300 rooms for the Olympic Family and the proposed benchmark of 20,000 rooms for fans, approx. 24,500 additional rooms would have to be developed. A capital investment of approx. EUR 1.75 billion has been estimated for this investment, mainly to be undertaken by private investors. In Total a non-OCOG budget of about EUR 5.3 billion has been estimated, and should reflect the major long-term capital investments in the city and the region.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

Permanent vs. Temporary Infrastructure Wherever an adequate and viable post-use ensures the long-term use of a competition or noncompetition venue, it should be built permanently, also to leave a legacy of the Olympic Games. But since mega-event requirements - like for the Olympic Winter Games - do sometimes not go along with local or regional needs, temporary construction work should be considered, where event requirements exceed local needs. It has to be pointed out, that construction costs for a temporary venue may, but do not necessarily have to be lower than permanent works, since the reassembling costs would have to be included as well. Still, taking the entire life span of a building into consideration, operational, maintenance and renovation costs can be saved. The Lviv 2022 Games Concept therefore proposes temporary installations where no post-use can be guaranteed. It could for example be planned to dismantle the Speed Skating Venue structure after the Games and only leave the ice venue as a legacy in the city for training purposes (or even entirely dismantle the entire structure). For the temporary installations different financial models could be considered. > Buy and Resell

The structures can be bought to resell them subsequently, thus construction costs could partially be reimbursed. The initial investment may be higher compared to the leasing model, but the total costs depend upon the potentials (and of course the risk) to resell the entire venue or individual structures. > Leasing

To lease the entire structure are estimated lower compared to the initial costs for the buy and resell model. However no disposal of asset can be made after the Games. Furthermore, costs of the leasing model also strongly depend upon the reusability of the single components.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

Budget Distribution The following overview provides preliminary estimates of the yearly expenditure distribution from 2012 until 2021: 2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

Sum

210

290

340

370

270

170

1,770

Airport

100

Roads

160

220

270

290

210

1,310

Railways

360

Competition venues

112

100

107

710

Lviv Ice Zone

390

Tysovets Snow Zone

120

Volovets Alpine Arena

200

229

250

225

260

271

162

1,473

Olympic Villages

100

106

365

Media Accommodation

100

140

150

118

738

IOC Hotel

162

IBC/MPC

208

Accommodation

105

115

118

833

Other

103

478

207

460

793

868

887

810

738

456

5,263

Transport

Non-Competition venues

totAL eUr (MM)

Projection of Infrastructure Budget Distribution (EUR 2012)

It is suggested to decide near-term which proposed infrastructure measures to include into the strategic development plans of the City and the region to be able to commence the works as soon as possible. Especially, since some legacy projects could even be implemented irrespective of the bid. Furthermore, it should be pointed out that all permanently built venues should be in place for test events the season before the Games. The test events in temporary venues are usually run just before the start of the season in order to reduce the cost.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

10. Recommendations

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

10. Recommendations As the previous chapters have shown, Lviv, Tysovets and Volovets have the general potential to host Olympic Winter Games in 2022. However, the city and the region significantly lack in sports venues, accommodation capacities and transport infrastructure. The overall construction costs have been estimated at minimum EUR 5.3 billion to be financed primarily from public sources (not including potentially necessary upgrades of technology and energy infrastructure). As this would represent a relevant part of capital investment in the country over the next ten years, the decisions should not be driven by an exemplary Games Plan but by the long-term planning vision of Western Ukraine, e.g.: > Legacy for the City: A renewed urban development in Lviv meeting the needs of residen-

tial housing, convention facilities, multi-functional halls for public events and sports venues for high-performance as well as public ice-sports > Legacy for Sports: A Nordic sports hub in Tysovets serving as a centre of excellence for

generations of Ukrainian athletes to come as well as for local recreation in the Lviv region. > Legacy for tourism: A prime skiing resort in the beautiful mountains around Volovets to

kick-start the tourism development in the Carpathians. An Olympic Bid suits perfectly to serve as a catalyst to align and implement “Legacy Projects” to the benefit of the region. As a side-effect, starting selected projects irrespective of the bid would not only leave a direct legacy but also demonstrate the commitment of the government to deliver towards the IOC. However, to get there on-time, a coordinated process has to be started immediately.

10.1 Roadmap to October 2013 The official nomination of the Applicant Cities is expected to happen not before October/November 2013. The focus of the recommendations in this report is on the period from now to the beginning of the official Bid process, referred to as the “Pre-Bid Phase”. To make efficient use of this 18 months period, the first task would be the constitution and funding of a preliminary organisational structure to oversee and coordinate the Pre-Bid-Phase. By October 2012 the relevant stakeholders should be able to agree on a consolidated Lviv 2022 Games concept regarding the “Legacy Projects” planned irrespective of the Bid. This should at least lead to the following results ready to be presented to the IOC Evaluation Commission in early 2015: > The realisation of a multifunctional ice hall in Lviv for the Euro Basket 2015 that could be

used for the ice hockey competitions during the Games > The ground breaking of the first phase of a new trade fair and convention centre in Lviv that

could be used as a Main Media Centre during the Games > The detailed planning and first measures of an upgrade of the M06 as the main road to Car-

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

pathians connecting Lviv with the potential venues in Tysovets and Volovets > The detailed planning and first measures of a nordic training centre for biathlon/cross-

country (or ski jumping) in Tysovets > The detailed planning and first measures of a skiing resort development in Volovets

The success of a future bid also depends on the public awareness and international perception of the applying city and nation. It is therefore recommended to develop and implement a Pre-Bid communications-strategy by October 2013. As the IOC rules-of-conduct for public relations, international relations as well as public events are quite rigid, this should preferably be done by an international agency experienced with Olympic bids and nation branding. To be prepared for the official bid start and the submission of the first Bid file in early 2014 the pre-Bid Committee should also commission detailed planning studies as soon as possible. This is necessary as the non-existent infrastructure, the projected budget and environmental concerns are expected to play a major role in the media from the very beginning of the bid campaign. To answer potential criticism pro-actively, it is recommended to develop the key themes of the Mini Bid Book already by October 2013: > Design of competition and non-competition venues > Development of a transportation concept > Development of an accommodation concept > Projection of OCOG/ non-OCOG budget and the potential socio-economic impact > Initial environmental impact assessments

10.2 Organisational Structure In order to guarantee a seamless transformation of the Pre-Bid organisation to the official Bid

Recommendations â &#x201E; Organisation in Pre-Bid Phase

phase it is recommended to set up a professional and effective structure from the very beginning. Focal point of the proposed structure would be a Pre-Bid Committee of initially about 6 people,

Government / NoC

Delivery Agency (Legacy Projects)

Pre-Bid Committee LVIV 2022

Steering Group

Venues

Co-ordination

Administration

Roads and Railways

Planning

Sports (NOC/NF)

Tourism

Communication

Olympic Experts

Proposed Organisational Chart

ProProjekt

AS&P

PROPROJEKT / AS&P

April 2012 Olympic Winter Games Lviv 2022 - Concept Study

94 27 April, 2012

â&#x20AC;ş

96 49

being responsible for co-ordinating the stakeholders and the external consultants for planning and communication. In the following bid phases this structure will have to be extended to up to 40 employees. To be able to take decisions efficiently the director/ CEO of the committee should receive direct guidance from the Government of Ukraine/ NoC. A Steering Group of highlevel representatives should guarantee that all relevant stakeholders are involved and informed about the Bid process on a monthly basis. As the infrastructure demand in Lviv and the region is very high it is also recommended to constitute a dedicated Delivery Agency at this early stage for the planning and implementation of all public long-term infrastructure, such as venues, roads, railways and tourism facilities. In the Pre-Bid Phase this agency will mainly deal with the kick-off of the legacy projects. In the subsequent phases it will care for all Olympic related public infrastructures. In case of a successful bid it will be of great benefit to already have in place a state agency for the delivery of these facilities, unlike e.g. for London 2012 or Qatar 2022 where it took over a year to found such institutions.

10.3 Budget for the Pre-Bid-Phase As the essential tasks for the Pre-Bid Committee will be limited to stakeholder co-ordination, conducting first studies and running an initial campaign a moderate budget of about EUR 5 million should be sufficient until end of 2013. A rough breakdown of the major budget items is given in the table below.

Pre-Bid Budget 2012 [MM €]

2013 [MM €]

Sum [MM €]

Co-ordination & administration

0,3

0,7

Master planning & studies

0,6

1,4

Communication & events

0,6

1,4

totAL

1.5

4.1

2012 [MM €]

2013 [MM €]

Sum [MM €]

Multi-function Ice Hall Lviv

Trade fair and convention centre

Upgrade road to Mountains (M06)

Nordic training centre Tysovets

Planning: Legacy Projects

Skiing resort Volovets totAL

Apart from the Pre-Bid budget directly related to the bid it has to be considered that relevant costs will occur for the planning and realisation of the legacy projects. As the exact number and scope of these projects are not yet defined it is hard to give a sound estimation of the necessary budget. Assuming that the multifunctional ice hall in Lviv will start construction already in 2013

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012

and that for all other above named measures feasibility studies and/or preliminary design work will be carried out about 3-6% of the investment costs are to be spent the years 2012 and 2013. Subject to the concept consolidation by October 2012 the costs can roughly be estimated at EUR 45 million.

10.4 Rules of Conduct Finally it is very important to point out, that from the moment of the first expression of interest to organise an Olympic Games the potential host city and country enters the world stage and draws the attention of international media. As this already has been started by the recent announcement of the president of Ukraine, the Lviv 2022 Bid should from now on strictly follow the IOC Code of Ethics and the Rules of Conduct applying to potential Applicant Cities. In this regard, special attention has to be paid to avoiding the use of any of the Olympic marks, especially the Olympic symbol. Until official authorisation by the IOC no logo, brand, document, institution or event must use the word â&#x20AC;&#x153;Olympicâ&#x20AC;? nor use the Olympic Rings. It has further to be respected that no official promotion of the Bid must be undertaken outside the Ukraine until Lviv is officially nominated as a Candidate City for 2022 (not before May 2014). During the time of the bid it is also not allowed to invite IOC members or give any kinds of gifts to them ,with the aim of promoting the Bid. In addition the IOC requests a fair and respectful relation between potential bid cities. The Lviv 2022 representatives should therefore avoid any reference or comparison to any other potential bid city at all. To avoid any breaches of the IOC rules, it is urgently recommended to centrally approve every public announcement and official statements by the communications department of the Pre-Bid Committee. Only coordinated public relations work being in line with the IOC rules will contribute to the success of a future bid.

ProProjekt

AS&P

April 2012