Competition and a sound regulatory framework in Bahrain Competition and a sound regulatory framework in Bahrain
Competition and a sound regulatory framework in Bahrain NEWSLETTER Issue: 02 | March 2014
CONTENTS
02
Competition and a sound regulatory framework in Bahrain NEWSLETTER Issue: 02 | March 2014
2
TRA Newsletter
March 2014
02 Competition and a sound 02 regulatory framework Competition and a sound 02 regulatory framework Competition and a sound 02 regulatory framework Competition and a sound 02 regulatory framework Competition and a sound regulatory framework
PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE In line with the TRA’s commitment to transparency and fairness in all its operations and procedures, TRA Bahrain stated that both of its cases in Court against MENATELECOM are suspended.The Urgent Matters Court decisions on the Case 2013/464 - MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 20th March 2013 to stay execution of Public Order number 4, and Case 2013/474 – MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 24th March 2013 to Stay the Auction process; and the execution of Public Order number 4, both were in favor of MENATELECOM. However, TRA filed an appeal and hence the orders of the Urgent Matters Court got suspended by an order until the Appellate Court issues its judgment. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which.
Dr Mohammed A.AL-Amer President TRA Newsletter
March 2014
3
TELECOM
ACHIEVEMENTS Competition and a sound regulatory In line with the TRA’s commitment to transparency and fairness in all its operations and procedures, TRA Bahrain stated that both of its cases in Court against MENATELECOM are suspended. The Urgent Matters Court decisions on the Case 2013/464 - MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 20th March 2013 to stay execution of Public Order number 4, and Case 2013/474 – MENATELECOM.
Competition and a sound regulatory framework in Bahrain In line with the TRA’s commitment to transparency and fairness in all its operations and procedures, TRA Bahrain stated that both of its cases in Court against MENATELECOM are suspended. The Urgent Matters Court decisions on the Case 2013/464 - MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 20th March 2013 to stay execution of Public Order number 4, and Case 2013/474 – MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 24th March 2013 to Stay the Auction process; and the execution of Public Order number 4.
4
TRA Newsletter
March 2014
TELECOM AWARDS
Competition and a sound regulatory framework In line with the TRA’s commitment to transparency and fairness in all its operations and procedures, TRA Bahrain stated that both of its cases in Court against MENATELECOM are suspended.The Urgent Matters Court decisions on the Case 2013/464 MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 20th March 2013 to stay execution of Public Order number 4, and Case 2013/474 – MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 24th March 2013 to .
Competition and a sound regulatory In line with the TRA’s commitment to transparency and fairness in all its operations and procedures, TRA Bahrain stated that both of its cases in Court against MENATELECOM are suspended. The Urgent Matters Court decisions on the Case 2013/464 - MENATELECOM. The Urgent Matters Court decisions on the Case 2013/464 - MENATELECOM.
Competition and a sound regulatory framework TRA Newsletter
March 2014
5
COVER STORY
COMPETITION AND A SOUND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK IN BAHRAIN 6
TRA Newsletter
March 2014
In line with the TRA’s commitment to transparency and fairness in all its operations and procedures, TRA Bahrain stated that both of its cases in Court against MENATELECOM are suspended. The Urgent Matters Court decisions on the Case 2013/464 - MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 20th March 2013 to stay execution of Public Order number 4, and Case 2013/474 – MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 24th March 2013 to Stay the Auction process; and the execution of Public Order number 4, both were in favor of MENATELECOM. However, TRA filed an appeal and hence the orders of the Urgent Matters Court got suspended by an order until the Appellate Court issues its judgment.
TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which.
TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which TRA filed an appeal and hence the orders of the Urgent Matters Court got suspended by an order until the Appellate Court issues its judgment. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which. In line with the TRA’s commitment to transparency and fairness in all its operations and procedures, TRA Bahrain stated that both of its cases in Court against MENATELECOM are suspended. The Urgent Matters Court decisions on the Case 2013/464 - MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 20th March 2013 to stay execution of Public Order number 4, and Case 2013/474 – MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 24th March 2013 to Stay the
Auction process; and the execution of Public Order number 4, both were in favor of MENATELECOM. However, TRA filed an appeal and hence the orders of the Urgent Matters Court got suspended by an order until the Appellate Court issues its judgment. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which TRA filed an appeal and hence the orders of the Urgent Matters Court got suspended by an order until the Appellate Court issues its judgment. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which. In line with the TRA’s commitment to transparency and fairness in all its operations and procedures, TRA Bahrain stated that both of its cases in Court against MENATELECOM are suspended.The Urgent Matters Court decisions on the Case 2013/464 - MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 20th March 2013 to stay execution of Public Order number 4, and Case 2013/474 – MENATELECOM vs. TRA on 24th March 2013 to Stay the Auction process; and the execution of Public Order number 4, both were in favor of MENATELECOM. However, TRA filed an appeal and hence the orders of the Urgent Matters Court got suspended by an order until the Appellate Court issues its judgment. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which TRA filed an appeal and hence the orders of the Urgent Matters Court got suspended by an order until the Appellate Court isse number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which. TRA also stated that Public Notice number 5 was issued on 21st March by virtue of which.
TRA Newsletter
March 2014
7