CHIEF EDITOR Andreas Yanuar Jacky Thiodore STUDENT COORDINATOR David Kristiawan ART DIRECTOR David Kristiawan PROOF READER Jenny Alvionita PHOTOGRAPHY By Students PU UPH Photography Team TRANSLATOR Jenny Alvionita COVER Randy Gunawan
Martin L. Katoppo, Dean Julia Tan, Executive Dean Erwin Widodo, Director Admin Ferry Gunawan, Department Chair FULL TIME FACULTY Alvar Mensana Andreas Yanuar Ayu Larasati David Hutama Dicky Tanumihardja Emanuel Agung Felia Srinaga Fernisia Richtia Ferry Gunawan Gregorius A. Gegana I Ketut Canadarma Jacky Thiodore Julia Dewi Raymond Gandayuwana Santoni Stanley Wangsadiharja Susinety Prakoso Undi Gunawan VISITING FACULTY Adi Purnomo Adetania Pramanik Ahmad Djuhara Amir Sidharta
Ari Widio Ardy Hartono Ary Indra Asa Darmatriaji Avianti Armand Baskoro Junianto Bianpoen Carolina Djunaedi Dani Hermawan Dennis Indramawan Dimas Satria Elisa Sutanudjaja Endy Subijono Evytriana Tasman Finarya Legoh Firman Herwanto Glenn Hajadi Glenn Hartanto Hafiz Amirol Ida Zureidar Joe S. Willendra Lucia Helly Purwaningsih Monica Dewi Indrasari Realrich Sjarief Robin Hartanto Suwardana Winata M. Yusni Aziz Wendy Djuhara
Archive : Progression Year 4 © Department of Architecture Universitas Pelita Harapan 2018
All writings and printed materials in the publication may only be reproduced with the permission of the editor. opinions expressed in the article in this issue are those of authors and do not reflect thoseof authors and publisher. Authors are responsible for verifying the accuracy of all published data.
First published, July 2018 ISBN: 978-602-52441-6-2 ISBN: 978-602-52441-7-9 (ebk) Published by Publication Unit Architecture UPH Department of Architecture Universitas Pelita Harapan UPH Tower, Lippo Karawaci Tangerang 15811, Banten Telp. 021 5470901 ext 1293, email: uphpublicationunit@gmail.com sod.uph@uph.edu
TABLE OF CONTENTS Editorial Table of Contents Editor’s Introduction Faculty Introduction
Skripsi Introduction
Tugas Akhir Introduction
DA5 Introduction
DBR Introduction
CHAIRMAN INTRODUCTION UPH Architecture program is a platform for productive idea generator. Each semester the students creatively produce new ideas. Like a flame, ideas can dim overtime if not spread out immediately. Thus the UPH Architecture Department has committed to spread multiple and multitude of ideas produced by the students to the general public through Archive publications. This year’s Archive is different from years past publications. In this Archive we would like to show the process of every level of study by two different year. Archive: Progression Year 1 consists of designs by first year students and Archive: Progression Year 2 by second year students and so on until Progression Year 4. Each year’s results had its own character and dynamic. Not only were we satisfied with publishing four Archives, this year we also launched a digital archive platform with our domain www.archuph.com. In this platform, the general public could view the uploaded designs of each student’s process in every assignment. With this platform we hoped to share ideas that have been produced by the students and to be better acknowledged by their peers and the general public. As a flame on a candle, it can light up the darkness if spread out from wick to wick. Through Archive Architecture UPH, we hope to bring
Chairman
inspiration to a wider architecture audience.
Ferry Gunawan
i
ii
EDITOR INTRODUCTION The architecture progression in an academ-
can be noticed in the stages of Studio and Final
ic environment almost never stops surprising
Project.
us. The same lecturers and curriculum when connecting with different students will bear
We have several stages for Studio. It is started
different fruits. Those fruits are unpredictable
from Studio Dasar Desain 1 and 2 on the first
and have become an academic nutrition for our
year, Studio Perancangan Arsitektur 1 and 2 on
educational institution. The largest academic
the second year, Studio Perancangan A and B
nutrition relies on the students who are unique
on the third year, and on the fourth year stu-
with their own thinking.
dents can choose which one as their final project either thesis or project.
Students have their own luxury in exploring architecture. They have a luxury amount of time
The first changes occurred on studio nam-
to do mistakes and unlimited trial to achieve
ing from Studio Perancangan Arsitektur into
their goals and towards a higher achievement
Studio Desain Arsitektur. This one changes
where they feel satisfied. The second luxury is
intended to sharpen learning materials on ev-
their powerful energy level. They can pursue
ery stage and to keep the continuity of studio
their own design idea in an excellent physical
learning from the first until the final year.
condition, high enthusiasm, and wholeheartedly. Another student’s luxury is an opportunity
The other changes occurred on the third and
to manifest their project as a design process
fourth-year. Studio Perancangan A and B are
instead of a final product. Every edition of Ar-
changed into Studio Desain Arsitektur 4 and 5.
chive UPH Architecture has a purpose to show
Once the students pass through Studio Desain
architecture progression from how the students
Arsitektur 5, they are going to have their final
utilize their luxuries to turn their unique idea
project named Desain Berbasis Riset. This fi-
into masterpieces.
nal project comes in a new format as Desain Berbasis Riset that replaces the previous final
The theme of this archive is “progression”.
project (thesis or project).
This theme is raised to mark out a curriculum transition which has been held since 2016 on
This Archive Progression contains the tran-
UPH Architecture Study Program. This curric-
sition of students’ works one year before the
ulum change is needed as an academic evalua-
changes (students of batch 2015) and one year
tion, also a response to the architectural con-
after the changes (students of batch 2016). Dif-
stitution that is already drafted at the moment
fer from the previous Archive, in this edition,
and soon will be realized. Significant change
their works will be published in four series of
iii
books: Archive year 1, year 2, year 3 and year 4.
such as designing a study carrel, classroom and then the kindergarten itself. In 2016 academic
Archive year 1 contains the projects of Studio
calendar, the studio’s name has changed into
Dasar Desain 1 and 2 (SDD 1 & SDD 2). SDD
Studio Desain Arsitektur 1 but it still has the
1 aims to introduce the students about the de-
same goal. There are three projects on Studio
sign process, abstraction, form, and compo-
Desain Arsitektur 1. Active Play Space tends
sition so they can create a form iteration and
to train sensibility towards human motion and
composition. The evolution generates a shift-
understand the tectonic through an installation
ing learning process from manual to digital.
design. Rumah Wisata Nusantara tends to de-
The learning progress of SDD tries to gain the
velop student’s sensibility about character of
potential of both manual and digital simulta-
place. House of the Client tends to figure out
neously.
both needs and desires of the occupant. Studio Desain Arsitektur 2 still works on public activ-
Each studio has its unique brief. The brief in
ities within the function of an art gallery. On
SDD 1/ 2015 learns about form, scale, and
this project, students are expected to analyze an
proportion through the structure of human’s
artwork as a starting point to develop tectonic
head. SDD 2/ 2015 learns about a space
aspects and experience of space in the gallery.
through geometrical performance. SDD 1/ 2016 learns about statistic, organic, and kinetic
There is a significant change in third-year stu-
form. And the last is SDD 2/ 2016, students
dio’s structure. Beside Studio Perancangan Ar-
explore about the tangible and intangible thing
sitektur 3, the third-year has two other studios
which affects quality and flow of a space and
at the beginning of the year. They are Peran-
tweaks users’ perception.
cangan Arsitektur A, it focuses on city issues and Studio Perancangan Arsitektur B, it focuses
On the second-year, the students are placed to
on technology issues within architecture. Every
design a project considering ergonomic, varied
lecturer in those studios is responsible to of-
activities, private/public space program, tec-
fer a specific topic/brief. Later, students can
tonic, and site planning. Studio Perancangan
choose which topic that they are interested in
Arsitektur 1 carried them out by two projects:
and which studio that they are going into.
Resting Place and House for People with Disabilities. Studio Perancangan Arsitektur 2 shift-
Both of those studios stages have changed into
ed to public activities which is designing a kin-
Studio Desain Arsitektur 3 (DA 3) and Studio
dergarten. This Kindergarten project is directed
Desain Arsitektur 4 (DA 4). These changes give
within 3 exercises (from small to larger scale)
hierarchy and order applied into the course.
iv
The students can only take the studio in a grad-
Nowadays there is no longer two options/
ual order and only have one brief for the whole
channels between thesis and project. As the fi-
studio. The main objectives in DA3 are able to
nal project, the students have to design based
design public function and consider their de-
on theoretical and practical research. This
sign according to urban issues. Through a proj-
would like to start doing a research on certain
ect called Building for Temporary Living Space,
issues (thesis) and outcoming with design solu-
the students can learn about how a vertical liv-
tions (project). The name of the final project is
ing plays a role at Mangga Besar district, Jakar-
changed into Desain Berbasis Riset for one se-
ta. Next, on Reinvention of Urban Public Life
mester. At seventh semester, Seminar class will
project, Studio DA 4 goes further with learning
no longer exist and replaced by another stage
about urban planning in a specific context. The
of studio that is Desain Arsitektur 5. In DA5,
project planning is discussed within separate
the students are given a case about public space
group during the first half semester. Later it is
with some strict regulations. The students must
continued by individual work that each student
get closer and understand the reality of the
designs a building with its specific functions.
built environment field. The dynamics changes
While master planning the area, the students
could be seen from the students’ works when
analyze several issues from economics, social,
executing the brief: In Between Space.
political, climate, until infrastructure aspects. The building design must be specific and must
By reading every series of Archive, we can find
deal with the sustainable system, utility system,
out how curriculum changes affect through the
and other buildings’ performance.
work of two different students’ batches. We can also find further about how the progression
And so, changes on the fourth-year. Before-
of every single year has been made, before and
hand, students have two channels to go either
after curriculum changes happened.
thesis or project. On which channels is pursued by students in two semesters. The first semes-
The curriculum absolutely cannot guarantee
ter in thesis is set for students to do research
the quality of architectural progression because
question about certain issues, dig into theory
it’s just a platform. The coordinator and other
and observe case study. The next semester,
lecturers have a significant role undertaking this
they will evaluate their research object based on
case. The coordinator of every studio translates
the theoretical review they’ve done before. On
the goals our curriculum with their own ways.
project channel, as the first semester, students
The theme and brief in the studio are differ on
are going to research issues and propose their
every single academic year and it is interesting
concept design. Later they develop their design
progression. Every lecturer with their own spe-
in much elaborate consideration to the issues.
cific competency has colored the architectural progression in each studio. To be able to see the
v
diversity, the students and lecturers have a tradition to visit the entire studios at the end of the year. The annual event that held and planned by student association is called as Friday Display (now has been changed as Final Display). Each studio is turned into an exhibition space and the people are entertained by some relaxing performances. Therefore, the whole studios might be able to summon and spread the design passion within various projects. Archive wants to show that passion as well. Unfortunately, considering the limitation of the medium, we cannot show all of them. Some projects we don’t have any chance to put into this Archive can be seen through another medium managed by Publication Unit Architecture UPH. We offer few videos for you that could easily be found on Youtube channel of Arsitektur UPH and Instagram account: pu_architectureuph. Besides that, we invite you to see a lot more UPH architecture students’ projects in our Online Archive at www.archuph.com. On that website, you may be able to see how the progress is and the final product of every student. All those surprises build up architecture progression in an academic environment never lose the creativity and show interesting works from years to years. This substance in university level has produced excitement for both students and lecturers to push forward future architecture. This kind of excitement that we want to share and transmit to our readers through these four
Editor
Archives.
Andreas Yanuar and Jacky Thiodore
vi
SKRIPSI Instructors: Undi Gunawan Setiadi Sopandi Susinety Prakoso
Instructor: Susinety Prakoso
Instructor: Susinety Prakoso
Instructor: Setiadi Sopandi
TUGAS AKHIR
Instructor: Realrich Sjarief
Instructor: Denis Indramawan
Instructor: I Ketut Canadarma
DESAIN ARSITKETUR 5
Instructor: Glenn Hartanto
Instructor: Glenn Hartanto
Instructor: Suwardana Winata
DESAIN BERBASIS RISET
Instructor: Santoni
Instructor: Santoni
Instructor: Susinety Prakoso