Fjord C omma n d a nt ’s H ou s e C a mp A re a Pa th from C a mp A re a to Fore st Fa l sta d Fore st
HI STO R I C AL
Most societies have their scars of history resulting from involvement in war and civil unrest or adherence to belief systems based on intolerance, racial discrimination or ethic hostilities. A range of places, sites and institutions represent the legacy of these painful periods. These sites bring shame upon us now for the cruelty and ultimate futility of the events occurred within them and the ideologies they represented [Logan, Reeves 2009]. They may also be troublesome because it threatens to break through into the present in the disruptive ways, opening up social divisions, perhaps by playing into imagined, even nightmarish, futures [Mcdonald 2010]. Increasingly, however, they are now being regarded as “heritage sites”, apparently far from the view of heritage that prevailed some times ago when that concept was almost entirely concerned with protecting the great and beautiful creation of the past: reflections of the creative genius of
M AT T E R S
humanity rather than the reverse – the destructive and cruel side of history. Sometimes site gradually change as memories of the past fade or are distorted; even sometimes, it's argued, sites should be actively changed where they merely aid the remembrance of the perpetrators of pain and shame rather than the victims. Sometimes whole sites may be missing from the public consciousness perhaps because the public in question does not want to remember the values associated with such places. As Elie Wiesel, Nobel Prize winner, said: “The executioner always win twice, the second time with the silence”. Some sites, instead, harbouring memories that serve to maintain a group's sense of connection with its roots in the past. Frequently such places have political functions, for propaganda for example. [Logan, Reeves 2009]