Traffic Study: Traffic Impact Assessment A brief note for Urban Transport Course By Riza Atiq Rahmat Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Traffic Study – Traffic Impact Assessment
All development will generate traffic into current or future transport facilities
All big development will generate internal traffic
TIA will answer the question of: What will the effect of a development to the surrounding transport facilities What is the magnitude additional traffic due to the development to the existing traffic How will the additional traffic effect the current traffic
What is the proposal to alleviate or minimise the impact
High density development will generate high volume of traffic 1
Developer
Architect / town planner
Local Authority
Instruction by the local authority to execute TIA
Appointment of a transport engineer
Discussion to determine the scope, study area and study methodology
Collate existing data and information
Traffic survey
Analyses: Trip generation Modal split Trip distribution Trip assignment Analyses of LOS (Level of service) Problem evaluation Proposal to alleviate or reduce the identified problems
Review the original lay-out plan and propose any improvement to the client and land use
Final Report
2
TIA Content 1. Existing Situation Existing government transport policies for the development area Structure plan and local plan prepared by the Local Authority Existing traffic and public transport facilities 1200
Traffic Volume (PCU/Hr
1000
800
600
400
200
0 6-7
7-8
8-9
9-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 Masa Menuju P/Bandar Dari P/Bandar
16 hours traffic count
3
65 34 54 28 52 62
42 59 59 45
62 75
Direction
Traffic Volume
Green Time (s)
Lane
Capacity
V/C ratio
South bound - straight - Right turn - Left turn
658 345 542
32 32 59
2 1 1
980 490 903
0.67 0.70 0.60
North bound - straight - Right turn - Left turn
758 451 621
43 43 61
2 1 1
1317 658 934
0.58 0.68 0.66
West bound - straight - Right turn - Left turn
598 423 597
27 27 70
2 1 1
827 413 1072
0.72 1.02 0.56
East bound - straight - Right turn - Left turn
527 287 621
18 18 50
2 1 1
551 275 766
0.96 1.04 0.81
4
Road safety record Pedestrian facilities Identify all planned transport facilities in the vicinity of the development Identify all other developments in the vicinity of the development and quantify the combine impact to the external traffic Identify all existing public transport facilities and the impact of the development to the facilities Identify potential traffic problem in the development
5
2. Analyses Trip Generation Land use Office
Attraction per 100 sq.m floor area (morning) 3.7 person / hr
Production per 100 sq.m floor area (afternoon) 4.05 person / hr
Hospital
1.52 person / hr
1.32 person / hr
Shopping Centre
0.45 person / hr
0.95 person / hr
Primary school
2.5 person / hr
2.5 person / hr
High School
2.5 person / hr
2.5 person / hr
College / University
2.0 person / hr
1.8 person / hr
Land use Apartment
Production per unit (morning) 2.11 person / hr
Attraction per unit (afternoon) 1.79 person / hr
Condominium
2.05 person / hr
1.73 person / hr
Flat / low cost house
2.51 person / hr
2.10 person / hr
Single story link house
2.21 person / hr
1.81 person / hr
Double story link house
2.52 person / hr
2.15 person / hr
Semi detached house
2.55 person / hr
2.17 person / hr
Bungalow house
2.65 person / hr
2.25 person / hr
6
Example
Morning Land use Flat Single story link house Double story link house Condominium Total
Residential unit
Production rate Morning production
845 725
2.51 2.21
2121 1602
934
2.52
2354
837
2.05
1716 7793
Petang Land use Flat Single story link house Double story link house Condominium Total
Residential Production unit rate
Morning production
845 725
2.1 1.81
1775 1312
934
2.15
2008
837
1.73
1448 6543
7
Trip Distribution Gravity Model
Pi Aj Tij = Ki Kj Tij Where
Tij = Trip from zone i to zone j Pi = Production of zone i Aj = Attraction of zone j Tij = Travel time or travel cost between zone i and zone j = Parameter to be calibrated. In Klang Valley, = 2.05 for morning and afternoon peaks.
1 Ki = Kj Aj / Tij j
1 Kj = Ki Pi / Tij i
8
Aj / Tij Production Constraint Model:
Tij = Pi Aj / Tij j
Pi / Tij Attraction Constrain Model:
Tij = Aj Pi / Tij i
9
Example
Proposed Development
10
Trip Generation Land use
QTY
Rates
Flat
205
2.51
Link house
431
2.21
Semi-D
125
2.55
52
2.65
Bungalow
Production
Total
515 953 319 138
1924
Trip Distribution Destination
Travel Time (min)
Estimated attraction
Aj / Tij2.05 Distribution
Trip Distribution
Ipoh
35
92000
62.871
0.271
522
Batu Gajah
30
16500
15.466
0.067
128
Gopeng
10
17200 153.295
0.662
1273
Aj / Tij2.05 231.632
1.000
1924
=
Notes: Distribution = (Aj / Tij2.05 ) / ( Aj / Tij2.05)
11
Modal Split (Modal Choice) Influencing factors Car ownership Household Income Distance to the transport facilities Travel Time Travel Cost Car park availability
Peak Hour Modal Split in Kuala Lumpur Land use
Bus %
Car / van / jeep %
27.6
57.4
15.0
2
Government Office Company Office
48.0
45.6
6.4
3
Bank
49.9
45.0
5.1
4
Hotel
35.9
60.1
4.0
5
54.3
40.7
5.0
6
Shopping Centre Bungalow house
12.1
84.0
3.9
7
Semi-D house
16.2
79.4
4.4
8
Link House
42.1
48.5
9.4
9
Condominium
13.7
85.1
1.2
10
Apartment
39.9
45.0
15.1
11
Flat
49.5
28.3
21.7
1
Motor cycle %
(Source JKAL, DBKL Annual Report, 1991)
12
Average Passenger (including driver) in Kuala Lumpur. Land Use
Car / Van / Jeep
M / Cycle
Bus (big)
Bus (Mini)
1
Office
1.55
1.25
75
35
2
Hotel
1.55
1.25
*40
25
3
Shopping Centre Houses
2.14
1.30
75
35
2.05
1.38
75
35
4
(Source: JKAL, DBKL Annual Report, 1991)
13
Example A local authority has approved a proposed development of a housing estate. It consists of 1250 link houses, 155 semi-D houses, 78 bungalow houses, 390 units condominiums, 820 units apartments and 970 units of flats. Calculate both inbound and outbound traffic flows during morning peak hours.
Land use Unit Prod Produ Modal Split Person trip Number of cion uctio Vehicles n Bus car M/C Bus car M/C Bus car M/C rate Link house 1250 2.21 2763 42.1 48.5 9.4 1163 134 260 16 654 188 % % % 0 Semi-D 155 2.55 395 16.2 79.4 4.4 64 314 17 1 153 13 % % % Bungalow 78 2.65 207 12.1 84.0 3.9 25 174 8 1 85 6 % % % Condo 390 2.05 800 13.7 85.1 1.2 110 680 10 1 332 7 % % % Apartment 820 2.11 1730 39.9 45.0 15.1 690 779 261 9 380 189 % % % Flat 970 2.51 2435 49.5 28.3 21.7 1205 689 528 16 336 383 % % % total 44 1939 786
14
Trip Assignment Assigning O-D trips to the transport network
to Ipoh
To PLUS H’way 981 ukp/j
247 ukp/j 759 ukp/j Proposed Development
365 ukp/j to Batu Gajah
603 ukp/j 61 ukp/j 1021 ukp/j
to Gopeng
Assumption: Traffic growth 4.1% Base year: 2000
15
2004 To Ipoh
To PLUS H’way
247 ukp/j Proposed Development
790 ukp/j
380 ukp/j 603 ukp/j
To Batu Gajah 61 ukp/j 1063 ukp/j
to Gopeng
16
To Ipoh
to PLUS H’way
1690 ukp/j
Proposed development 1443 ukp/j
1303 ukp/j
to Batu Gajah
to Gopeng
17
3. Impact to the Road Network
Level-Of-Service (LOS) = Flow/Capacity (or V/C) V/C < 0.9 OK
V/C > 1.0 (LOS = F)
V/C < 0.3 (LOS = A)
18
4. Road Safety Safe to the residences Safe to the visitors
19
5. Internal Lay-out
20
6. Parking Space
Malaysia: 1 cps / 500 sq.ft floor area or 1.25 / residential unit
21
7. Public Transport
22
8. Pedestrian, bicycle and disable facilities
23