2017 Q4 STR Quarterly Report

Page 1

Save the Rain Fourth Quarterly Report 2017

October - December 2017 Joanne M. Mahoney County Executive

www.savetherain.us


ONONDAGA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF WATER ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION VISION To be a respected leader in wastewater treatment, storm water management, and the protection of our environment using state-of-the-art, innovative technologies and sound scientific principles as our guide.

MISSION To protect and improve the water environment of Onondaga County in a cost-effective manner ensuring the health and sustainability of our community and economy.

CORE VALUES

Excellence Teamwork Honesty Innovation Cost-Effectiveness Safety


Table of Contents Report from Commissioner Gray Projects Update 

Projects Summary

Green Projects Update  

Projects Summary Fact Sheets

Green Improvement Fund Update  

Green Improvement Fund Program Summary Fact Sheets

Metro WWTP Phosphorus Projects/TMDL/Ambient Monitoring Program Update    

Metro Phosphorus Optimization Project Metro Phosphorus Work Plan Project Onondaga Lake Water Quality Model Ambient Monitoring Program Water Quality Sampling Tributary Sampling Tributary Bacteria Compliance Assessment Onondaga Lake Sampling Biological Monitoring Program Sampling Summary

Legislative/Regulatory/Media Update   

Action Items for County Legislature Action Items for the Environmental Protection Committee Media Articles

Financial Update 

Contracts New Contracts Amendments to Existing Contracts Change Orders

Funding State Bond Act Funds Federal EPA Funds


Federal Army Corps of Engineers Funds EFC Loans 

Onondaga County Lake Improvement Project Fourth Stipulation of the ACJ Clinton/Lower MIS CSO Improvement Harbor Brook Drainage Basin CSO Abatement Midland CSO Abatement Sewer Separation of CSO Areas: 022/038/040/045/046A/046B/047/048/050/051/053/054 Save the Rain Education and Outreach Grant Appendix     

Project Payments Lake Improvement Project Status Report Federal and State Grants/Loans Approved and Received Chronology of Project Construction Starts Contractors for Construction Projects  Metro Treatment Plant  CSOs WEP Acronyms




GRAY PROJECTS UPDATE



Gray Projects Update There were no gray projects underway in the Save the Rain program during the fourth quarter of 2017.



GREEN PROJECTS UPDATE



Green Projects Update During the fourth quarter, the County’s contractors focused on completing punch list items for the completed projects in 2017. These projects include:     

Lancaster Avenue Green Street Ackerman Avenue Green Street McKinley Avenue Green Street West Newell Street Green Street Vacant Lot at 621 West Newell Street

Also during the quarter, the designs of several GI projects progressed. The Firehouse No. 5 project in CSO 007 reached the 25% design phase and the Harbor Brook Green Streets projects on Lakeview Avenue, Richmond Avenue, West Genesee Street, Wilbur Avenue, and Magnolia Street progressed from the fieldwork phase into the design phase. Additionally, the green streets on Fairfield Avenue and Hutchinson Avenue within CSO 052 reached the final design phases. These projects are slated for construction in 2017 and 2018 and join the following projects ready for construction:      

Roney Lane Green Street (CSO 060/077) Comstock Avenue Green Street (CSO 060/077) McKinley Park Greening (CSO 067) Charmouth Drive Green Street (CSO 052) Elmhurst Avenue Green Street (CSO 052) South Avenue Green Street (CSO 052)

Construction of the pilot infiltration manhole projects on Bishop Avenue and Craddock Street remained on hold during the quarter due to unexpected delays caused by National Grid’s gas main replacement projects. National Grid expects to complete their work by the first quarter of 2018 and the infiltration manhole projects will be constructed in 2018. Letters were sent to residents on Bishop Ave and Craddock Street to update them on the construction schedule. Construction of the 2017 Road Reconstruction green infrastructure projects was completed during the quarter. The projects on East Colvin Street, Wellesley Road, Prospect Avenue, and Hastings Place were constructed by the City’s contractor and funded by the County via an intermunicipal agreement between the two entities. All of the work was completed except for three of the infiltration trenches on East Colvin Street and one infiltration trench on Hastings Place. The remaining work will be completed in spring 2018. In total, the four projects will capture over 3.5 million gallons of stormwater annually when they are all fully complete. The City handled public outreach for each project, notifying surrounding residents and businesses what to expect during construction.


The County holds public information meetings for all of the projects in motion and expects an uptick in meetings during the winter and spring of 2017/2018 prior to the start of the 2018 construction season. Finally, the County received design proposals from qualified design professionals during the fourth quarter for the six additional GI projects in CSO 060/077. Design of these projects is expected to begin in early 2018.


Cit

FACT SHEET Fire Station No. 5

Project: Project Owner: Project Location: Sewershed: Technology: Runoff Reduction: Year Contracted: Project Cost: Prime Contractor:

Fire Station No. 5 City of Syracuse 114 N. Geddes Street CSO 007 Infiltration Trench 570,000 gal/yr TBD $150,000 (engineer’s estimate) D.E. Tarolli

Project Description: The Fire Station No. 5 project is another example of the Save the Rain Program targeting a specific priority area for green infrastructure implementation. This project, within the CSO 007 sewershed, is intended to reduce pollution to Harbor Brook and Onondaga Lake. The project will help to reduce the overflows from the Harbor Brook Intercepting Sewer, all the while providing a new parking lot at Fire Station No. 5, located on N. Geddes Street. Infiltration trenches will be constructed beneath the parking lot at the Fire Station. This green infrastructure practice provides water quality improvement through infiltration and storage, reducing overflows. The underground infiltration trench will capture a very large volume of stormwater runoff beneath the parking area. Upon completion, the underground infiltration trench will capture runoff from approximately 3/4 acre of impervious area from the fire station parking lot, building roof and North Geddes Street, reducing stormwater runoff to the combined sewer by approximately 570,000 gallons annually.

Typical Underground Infiltration Trench

Project Location – N. Geddes Street

Street View of Firehouse 5 (credit: Google)

Version 12/28/17


Project: Project Owner: Project Location: Sewershed: CSO: GI Technologies:

FACT SHEET Green Park: McKinley Park

Capture Area: Runoff Reduction: Year Contracted: Cost: Prime Contractor:

McKinley Park City of Syracuse Parks Department West Newell Street, West Calthrop, and West Pleasant Avenues. Midland 067 Bioretention, Infiltration, and Porous Pavement 51,800 sq. ft. (estimated) 945,000 gal/yr (estimated) 2017 (projected) $625,000 (engineer’s estimate) D.E. Tarolli and J&J Landscaping

Project Description: The McKinley Park Project is one of many projects accomplished through the collaborative efforts of Onondaga County Save the Rain and the City of Syracuse Parks and Recreation Department. As a neighborhood park, McKinley Park has served the recreational needs of the community since 1920. The primary goal of the project is to reduce the volume of stormwater that flows into the combined sewer system along West Newell Street, West Calthrop Avenue, and West Pleasant Avenue – all within the CSO 067 area. This project implements various green infrastructure technologies, including bioretention (also known as rain gardens) and porous pavement with an underground infiltration system. This infrastructure will capture runoff from the park and surrounding areas, totaling 51,000 square feet of drainage area. Stormwater will slowly soak into the ground or evaporate, eliminating excess runoff into the sewer system and improving the overall stormwater management and drainage in this area. A secondary goal of this project is to enhance McKinley Park by increasing green space and improving the basketball court. Existing pavement formerly used as a tennis court was removed entirely and replaced with open green space. Additionally, the former basketball half court was replaced with a full-sized porous pavement basketball court in partnership with the Jim and Juli Boeheim Foundation’s Courts4Kids Program. Court construction was finished during the summer with a ribbon cutting on August 1. Construction of the remaining improvements is scheduled to be completed in 2018. When the project is complete, an estimated 945,000 gallons of stormwater runoff per year will be removed from the combined sewer in the CSO 067 area.

Courts 4 Kids Porous Pavement Basketball Court Ribbon Cutting

Rendering of Bioretention Area Along W. Newell Street, Scheduled for 2018 Construction Version 12/29/2017


Project: Project Owner: Project Location: Sewershed: CSO: GI Technologies:

FACT SHEET Green Separation in CSO 052: South & Mitchell Avenues

Capture Area: Runoff Reduction: Year Contracted: Cost: Prime Contractor:

Green Separation in CSO 052 City of Syracuse 2426 South Avenue and Mitchell Ave. between South Ave. & Armstrong Pl. Midland 052 Detention/Slow Release, Infiltration, and Storm Sewer Separation 1,031,100 sq. ft. 3,781,200 gal/yr 2016 $2,428,000 Marcellus Construction Co., Inc.

Project Description: The Green Separation of CSO 052 Project was accomplished through the collaborative efforts of Onondaga County and the City of Syracuse. Historically, the area around the proposed detention basin had been prone to severe flooding throughout the year. This was due, in part, to years of illegal dumping that impacted the natural surface and groundwater flow patterns. The County and the City partnered to help limit this problem through the installation of a slow-release stormwater detention basin and infiltration system. Additionally, the County undertook a storm sewer separation project on Mitchell Avenue to separate stormwater from the existing combined sewer system. The primary goal of the project is to reduce the volume of stormwater that flows into the combined sewer system along South, Cornell, and Mitchell avenues, all within CSO 052. The secondary goal is to reduce the level of flooding experienced in this area. The new detention/slow release facility is constructed on property owned by the City of Syracuse and captures runoff from South and Cornell Avenues as well as from the City-owned property, totaling 890,400 square feet of drainage area. The facility has storage capacity for 1,155,700 gallons of stormwater. Stormwater will be slowly released to the Armstrong Place combined sewer system over time. It is expected that the detention/slow release facility will improve the stormwater management and drainage in this area and lessen the effects of flooding onto residential properties that adjoin the City-owned property. Additionally, runoff from 140,700 square feet of drainage area along Mitchell Avenue is collected in a new storm sewer system and directed to an underground stormwater infiltration basin with a runoff reduction volume of approximately 1,241,900 gallons per year. The Mitchell Avenue storm sewer system was constructed August 2016 - September 2016. Construction of the detention basins off of South Avenue started in 2016 and was completed in Fall 2017.

Mitchell Ave Underground Infiltration siteSystem

South Ave West Basin Version 12/29/17


Cit

FACT SHEET Green Street Candidates in CSO 052 Sewershed

Project: Project Owner: Project Location:

Sewershed: Technology: Runoff Reduction: Year Contracted: Project Cost: Construction: Prime Contractor:

CSO 052 Green Streets City of Syracuse Elmhurst, South, Fairfield, Fletcher, Edgewood, and Hutchinson Avenues and Charmouth Drive CSO 052 Infiltration Trench, Bioretention 6,587,000 gal/yr (total, estimated) TBD $1,500,000 (engineer’s estimate) early 2018 D.E. Tarolli

Project Description: The Green Streets in CSO 052 Project is another example of the Save the Rain Program targeting a specific priority area for green infrastructure implementation. This application, within the high priority CSO 052 sewershed, is intended to reduce pollution to Onondaga Creek and Onondaga Lake. The project will be located on seven streets within the City: Elmhurst Avenue, South Avenue, Charmouth Drive, Fairfield Avenue, Fletcher Avenue, Edgewood Avenue, and Hutchinson Avenue. The project will use two types of green infrastructure technology: underground infiltration trenches, and rain gardens (also known as bioretention). These green infrastructure practices will provide water quality improvement through infiltration and storage, reducing overflows. In total, the project consists of 22 underground infiltration trenches and 1 rain garden. The underground infiltration trenches provide a very high capture volume without an obtrusive footprint at the surface, maximizing cost efficiency. The County and City will simultaneously be offering street tree plantings within the neighborhoods. Upon completion of all seven streets, the project will capture runoff from approximately 9.75 acres of impervious area, reducing stormwater runoff to the sewer by approximately 6.5 million gallons annually. Project areas include:  Charmouth Drive from Robineau Road to Arlington Avenue – 6 underground infiltration trenches; annual stormwater runoff capture: 1,800,000 gallons 

Fairfield Avenue from Fletcher to South avenues – 1 underground trench, 1 bioretention area; annual stormwater runoff capture: 437,000 gallons

Hutchinson Avenue from Clayton to South Avenues and Fletcher and Edgewood Avenues from Hutchinson to Fairfield avenues – 7 underground infiltration trenches; annual stormwater runoff capture: 2,190,000 gallons South Avenue from W. Brighton to Eastman avenues – 4 underground infiltration trenches; annual runoff capture: 938,000 gallons Elmhurst Avenue from Bishop Avenue to Hunt and Randall Avenues 3 underground infiltration trenches; annual runoff capture: 1,222,000 gallons

 

Charmouth Dr Elmhurst Ave Glenwood Ave

Fairfield Ave Hutchinson Ave

Typical Underground Infiltration Trench

Project Locations Version 12/29/17


Project: Property Owner: GI Technologies: Project Locations:

FACT SHEET Green Streets in CSO 060/077 Sewershed Project Description: The Green Streets in CSO 060/077 Sewershed projects are comprehensive green street applications located on multiple streets within the CSO 060/077 sewershed. CSO 060/077 is a high priority sewershed that discharges frequently during rain events. The candidate streets are listed below with capture area and runoff reduction estimates:  Lancaster Avenue (Spring 2017) Capture Area: 560,489 sq. ft. Runoff Reduction: 3,290,000 gal/yr  Ackerman Avenue (Summer 2017) Capture Area: 387,245 sq. ft. Runoff Reduction: 3,450,000 gal/yr  McKinley Avenue (Summer 2017) Capture Area: 123,709 sq. ft. Runoff Reduction: 1,370,000 gal/yr  Roney Lane (Spring 2018) Capture Area: 187,778 sq. ft. Runoff Reduction: 760,000 gal/yr  Comstock Avenue (Spring 2018) Capture Area: 659,494 sq. ft. Runoff Reduction: 5,590,000 gal/yr

Sewershed: CSO: Capture Area: Runoff Reduction: Bid Price: Year Contracted: Contractors:

Green Streets in CSO 060/077 City of Syracuse Bioretention, Bioswales, Infiltration Trenches McKinley Ave. between S. Salina St. and S. State St. Roney Ln. at Smith Ln. Comstock Ave. between E. Colvin St. and Euclid Ave. Ackerman Ave between Euclid and Kensington Rd Lancaster Ave. between Euclid and Kensington Rd Midland 060/077 1,918,715 sq. ft. (total, all areas) 14,460,000 gal/year (total) TBD Estimated 2017/2018 D.E. Tarolli and J&J Landscaping

Project Locations In Red Boxes

In 2017-2018, each street identified above will proceed to construction. Each design is intended to demonstrate green infrastructure applications at key points along these streets in order to capture stormwater and enhance local urban streetscapes. The project is proposed to incorporate street tree plantings in the right-of-way, the installation of infiltration trenches underneath the roadway, tree planters, and rain gardens and bioretention areas throughout the project boundaries. Lancaster Avenue, Ackerman Avenue, and McKinley Avenue were all fully completed during the fourth quarter of 2017. Version 12/29/2017

Ackerman Avenue Vegetated Swales


Project: Project Owner: Project Location:

FACT SHEET Green Street: West Newell Street

Sewershed: CSO: GI Technologies: Capture Area: Runoff Reduction: Year Contracted: Construction cost: Prime Contractor:

West Newell Street City of Syracuse West Newell Street between Vale and Onondaga Creek Blvd. Midland 067 Underground Infiltration 5,182 sq. ft. 91,492 gal/yr 2017 $57,855 D.E. Tarolli

Project Description: The West Newell Street Green Street Project demonstrates the continued partnership between Onondaga County and the City of Syracuse through the Save the Rain Program. The project concept was put forth by the Green Project Committee with stakeholder input from county, city, and citizen representatives. This project constructed an underground infiltration trench along the north side of West Newell Street between the Onondaga Creek Bridge and Vale Street. The infiltration trench manages stormwater runoff from an estimated 5,182 square feet of drainage area from Newell Street in the maximum amount of storage space possible without disrupting the existing underground utilities in this area.

Photo of the Project Area after Construction at Newell Street, Looking West

Being completely underground, the infiltration trench system provides high capture efficiency without an obtrusive footprint at the surface. This project is complete and will capture nearly 92,000 gallons of stormwater runoff annually.

Version 12/13/2017

Map of the Green Street Project Area


Project: Project Owner: Project Location:

FACT SHEET Road Reconstruction East Colvin Street

Sewershed: CSO: GI Technology: Capture Area: Runoff Reduction: Year Contracted: Construction Cost: Prime Contractor:

East Colvin Street, Road Reconstruction City of Syracuse East Colvin Street (Jamesville Ave. to Comstock Ave.) Midland 060/077 Underground Infiltration Trench 122,060 sq. ft. 2,149,700 gal/yr 2017 TBD Ballard Construction

Project Description: The East Colvin Street Road Reconstruction project exemplifies the continued partnership between Onondaga County Save the Rain and the City of Syracuse Department of Public Works for the inclusion of green infrastructure in road reconstruction work. This application, within the CSO 060/077 area, is intended to reduce pollution to Onondaga Creek and Onondaga Lake. The project is installing six separate underground infiltration trenches spanning East Colvin Street between Jamesville and Comstock avenues. Each underground infiltration trench has varying widths, lengths and depths. This is due to multiple factors such as avoiding conflicts with water, sewer or electrical utilities. Stormwater runoff will be captured from the street new and existing catch basins, allowing the water to infiltrate into the stone storage and soak into the ground. High flows from heavy rain storms (above one inch over two hours) will flow back into the combined sewer system for safety. Construction of an East Colvin Street Infiltration Trench The streetscape will not look different after the work is complete, as the trenches are completely underground with no visible features at the surface. In 2017, three of the six infiltration trenches were constructed, with the remaining three to be constructed in Spring 2018. When complete, this project will manage runoff from 122,060 square feet of impervious drainage area, equating to approximately 2,149,700 gallons of stormwater runoff annually, within the high priority area of CSO 060/077. Boundaries of the Road Reconstruction Project on East Colvin Street are outlined in red on the map to the right Version 12/27/2017

Jamesville Ave. Comstock Ave.


Project: Project Owner: Project Location:

FACT SHEET Road Reconstruction: Hastings Place

Sewershed: CSO: GI Technology: Capture Area: Runoff Reduction: Year Contracted: Construction Cost: Prime Contractor:

Project Description: The Road Reconstruction project on Hastings Place exemplifies the continued partnership between Onondaga County and the City of Syracuse. This project is another example of Onondaga County partnering with the City of Syracuse Department of Public Works through their road reconstruction program for the installation of green infrastructure. This project, within the CSO 073A area, is intended to reduce pollution to Onondaga Creek and Onondaga Lake and is the thirteenth road reconstruction partnership project between the County and City under the Save the Rain program. This is also the County’s first green infrastructure project in CSO 073A, in the Ley Creek Sewershed. The project uses four underground infiltration trenches between James Street and the end of the street at Sunnycrest Park, to manage the runoff from Hastings Place and portions of Melrose Avenue. The four infiltration trenches are designed to manage runoff from varying areas of Hastings Place and Melrose Avenue to maximize the stormwater capture for the benefit of the environment. High flows from large rain events (more than one inch of rain over the course of a two hour period) will flow into the existing combined sewer system for safety. The streetscape will not look different after the work is complete, as the trenches are completely underground with no visible features at the surface. This project manages 45,322 square feet of impervious drainage area, equating to approximately 801,000 gallons of stormwater runoff annually, in CSO 073A. Trenches 1-3 were completed in 2017 with trench 4 expected to be completed in early 2018. Version 12/28/2017

Hastings Place Road Reconstruction City of Syracuse Hastings Place (James St. to End of Street at Sunnycrest Park) Ley Creek 073A Underground Infiltration Trench 45,322 sq. ft. 801,000 gal/yr 2017 TBD Ballard Construction

Construction of an Infiltration Trench on Hastings Place (September 2017)

Sunnycrest Park Road Reconstruction Project Area (Outlined in Red)


Project: Project Owner: Project Location:

FACT SHEET Road Reconstruction: Prospect Avenue

Sewershed: CSO: GI Technology: Capture Area: Runoff Reduction: Year Contracted: Construction Cost: Prime Contractor:

Prospect Avenue Road Reconstruction City of Syracuse Prospect Avenue (East Laurel St. to Butternut St.) Clinton 020 Underground Infiltration Trench 15,840. ft. 280,000 gal/yr 2017 TBD Ballard Construction

Project Description: The Road Reconstruction project on Prospect Avenue exemplifies the continued partnership between Onondaga County and the City of Syracuse. This project is another example of Onondaga County partnering with the City of Syracuse Department of Public Works through their road reconstruction program for the installation of green infrastructure. This project, within the CSO 020 area, is intended to reduce pollution to Onondaga Creek and Onondaga Lake and is the twelfth road reconstruction project completed through this partnership under the Save the Rain program. The project uses one underground infiltration trench on Prospect Avenue between East Laurel Street and Butternut Street, adjacent to St. Joseph’s Hospital, to manage the runoff from the avenue. Prospect Avenue is very steep, and as a result, the underground infiltration trench has five “steps” to manage the change in grade while also maximizing the stormwater capture. High flows from large rain events (more than one inch of rain over the course of a two hour period) will flow into the existing combined sewer system for safety. The streetscape will not look different after the work is complete, as the trenches are completely underground with no visible features at the surface. This project manages 15,840 square feet of impervious drainage area, for a total capture of approximately 280,000 gallons of stormwater runoff annually, in the medium priority area of CSO 020. The project was completed in 2017. Version 12/28/2017

Stepped Infiltration Trench on Prospect Avenue (September 2017)

St. Joseph’s Hospital

Project Area Map for the Road Reconstruction on Prospect Avenue (Outlined in Red)


Project: Project Owner: Project Location: Sewershed: CSO: GI Technology: Capture Area: Runoff Reduction: Year Contracted: Construction Cost: Prime Contractor:

FACT SHEET Road Reconstruction: Wellesley Road

Wellesley Road, Road Reconstruction City of Syracuse Wellesley Road (Charmouth Dr. to Glenwood Ave.) Midland 052 Underground Infiltration Trench 25,263 sq. ft. 447,000 gal/yr 2017 TBD Ballard Construction

Project Description: The Wellesley Road, Road Reconstruction project exemplifies the continued partnership between Onondaga County Save the Rain and the City of Syracuse Department of Public Works for the inclusion of green infrastructure in road reconstruction work. This is the tenth such partnership project to date. The project included two underground infiltration trenches on Wellesley Road between Charmouth Drive and Glenwood Avenue. The underground infiltration trenches are designed to capture runoff from the street via existing and new catch basins and allow the water to infiltrate into the stone storage and the ground. High flows from large rain storms (above one inch over two hours) flow back into the existing combined sewer system for safety. The infiltration trench system provides a very high capture volume without requiring an obtrusive footprint at the surface. The streetscape does not look different from before this construction as the trenches are completely underground with no visible features at the surface. In total, this project manages runoff from 25,263 square feet of impervious drainage area, equating to approximately 447,000 gallons of stormwater runoff annually, in high priority CSO 052.

Charmouth Drive

Construction of an Infiltration Trench on Wellesley Road (August 2017)

Boundaries of Wellesley Road, Road Reconstruction Project are outlined in red on the map to the left.

Glenwood Avenue

Version 9/27/2017


FACT SHEET Vacant Lot at 621 W. Newell Street Project Description: This project is one of several Save the Rain projects on West Newell Street in 2017. The 621 West Newell Street vacant lot was taken into ownership by the City of Syracuse in the year 2000. The lot has remained vacant since then and the site contains soil ideal for infiltration practices. A unique facet of this project is that the site is located approximately three hundred feet from Onondaga Creek and just down the road (approximately three and a half blocks) from McKinley Park, where another Save the Rain project will be constructed. The green infrastructure technology included with this project is a bioretention basin (also known as a rain garden). The bioretention basin is between the sidewalk and existing tree line on the vacant lot parcel and is designed to capture stormwater from West Newell Street via existing catch basins. The drainage area extends on West Newell Street from Vale Street to Baldwin Avenue. The bioretention area is planted with native plants and serves as a community beautification feature as well as stormwater management. Five apple trees were also planted as part of this project. All runoff from this one block stretch of road on West Newell Street is drained into a green infrastructure practice, instead of the combined sewer system. In total, this green infrastructure captures approximately 159,065 gallons of stormwater annually.

Project: Project Owner: Project Location: Sewershed: CSO: GI Technology: Capture Area: Runoff Reduction: Year Contracted: Price: Contractor:

Vacant Lot at 621 W. Newell St. City of Syracuse 621 West Newell Street Midland 067 Bioretention/Rain Garden 20,593 sq. ft. 159,065 gal/yr 2017 $93,645.63 D.E. Tarolli, Inc J&J Landscaping, LLC

Prior Conditions at the Vacant Lot at 621 West Newell Street

Rain Garden Installed at the Vacant Lot at 621 West Newell Street

Version 6/23/2017



GREEN IMPROVEMENT FUND



Green Improvement Fund (GIF) Projects Update During the fourth quarter, the 2017 GIF application period closed. This year, seven new GIF applications were received. These applications are currently under technical review and are expected to be presented to the GIF Review Committee during the first quarter of 2018. Construction of previously approved GIF projects continued, and the Tan A Grocery Store project completed construction, and construction began on the Mill Pond Landing project. Construction of several other GIF projects is expected in the 2018 construction season.

Green Improvement Fund Summary (as of 12/31/17) Projects Completed

93

Contract/Implementation Phase

17

Projects in Award Phase

1

Applications Under Review

7

Inactive/Ineligible

53

Total Applications Received

171


Project: Project Owner: Project Location: Sewershed: CSO: GI Technology:

FACT SHEET Green Improvement Fund Auto Row Realty (Crest Acura)

Capture Area: Runoff Reduction: Year Contracted: GIF Award:

Auto Row Realty (Crest Acura) Private 745 West Genesee St. Clinton/Lower MIS 066 Porous Pavement, Added Green Space 20,903 sq. ft. 400,800 gal/yr 2017 $135,627

Project Description: The Auto Row Realty project, also known as the Crest Acura GIF project, is located at 745 West Genesee Street and was completed in 2017. The GIF project consisted of rehabilitating the existing parking lot with porous pavement and added green space. The project included removing the existing asphalt and reinstalling porous asphalt, standard asphalt, and new green space. Porous pavement parking areas and travel lanes are now available for the majority of the parking lot. The added green space is along the street front sections of the property within the City right-0f-way.

Crest Acura Porous Pavement Parking Lot

Stormwater runoff from the parking lot is conveyed from the standard pavement to the porous pavement and green spaces. Any stormwater flows that exceed the required capture, storage and infiltration amount will be allowed to flow back into the existing combined system. In total, 20,903 square feet of impervious area is managed by the installed green infrastructure, equating to approximately 400,800 gallons of stormwater runoff capture annually.

Version 6/23/2017

Crest Acura New Added Green Space


Project: Project Owner: Project Location: Sewershed: CSO: GI Technology:

FACT SHEET Green Improvement Fund Park Avenue Lantern Corporation (Dietz Factory)

Capture Area: Runoff Reduction: Year Contracted: GIF Award:

Project Description: The Park Avenue Lantern Corporation project, also known as the Dietz Factory Redevelopment, located at 225 Wilkinson Street was completed in 2017. This Green Improvement Fund project installed three underground detention basins to capture, store, and slowly release stormwater runoff from parking areas and the roof of the building. The project also added green space areas that were formerly impervious. This project was part of a larger redevelopment of the Dietz Factory building converting the previously largely unused factory building to a mixed-use residential and commercial structure. Due to clay soils surrounding the project site, there was low infiltration capacity at this location. The green infrastructure was designed to capture the stormwater, store it, and slowly release it over time; reducing the peak flows that reach the CSO 066 combined sewer system in wet weather. The underground detention basin systems can store approximately 98,000 gallons of stormwater, when full. Approximately 9,500 square feet of green space was also added around the project site in areas that were formerly impervious cover.

Park Avenue Lantern Corporation (Dietz Factory) Private 225 Wilkinson Street Clinton/Lower MIS 066 Underground Detention Basins and Added Green Space 106,620 sq. ft. 2,006,100 gal/yr 2017 $517,000

Parking Lot Above Underground Detention Basin

Stormwater runoff from the parking areas and building roof is conveyed to the underground detention systems for storage, and over time is slowly released to the combined sewer. Any stormwater flows that exceed the designed capture and storage Added Green Space amount overflow back into the existing combined system. In total, 106,620 square feet of impervious area is managed by the green infrastructure installed in this project, equating to approximately 2,006,100 gallons of stormwater runoff capture annually in the high priority CSO 066 area. Version 12/28/2017


Project: Project Owner: Project Location: Sewershed: CSO: GI Technology:

FACT SHEET Jubilee Homes (PriceRite)

Capture Area: Runoff Reduction: Year Contracted: GIF Award:

Jubilee Homes (PriceRite) Private 601 South Ave. Midland 042 Porous Pavement, Underground Infiltration, and Bioretention 94,395 sq. ft. 1,662,400 gal/yr 2017 $200,000

Project Description: The Jubilee Homes Green Improvement Fund (GIF) project, located at 601 South Avenue, was completed in 2017. This project was part of the construction of a PriceRite grocery store in an area of the City of Syracuse commonly referred to as a “food desert� because of the lack of grocery options for local residents. The green infrastructure work included porous pavement, underground infiltration, and bioretention systems. The project included rehabilitating and expanding an existing building and constructing a new parking lot. Porous Pavement Parking Lot Porous pavement was installed in a portion of the parking lot, at the low end of the lot to collect runoff from the standard pavement portions. The bioretention area manages overflow from the porous pavement system, as well as a small portion of impervious area of the parking lot. Additionally, stormwater runoff from the building roof and remainder of the parking lot is collected and conveyed to an underground infiltration system beneath the parking lot. In total, 94,395 square feet of impervious area is managed by the installed green infrastructure, equating to approximately 1,662,400 gallons of stormwater runoff capture annually.

Version 6/23/2017

Bioretention Area and Porous Pavement


Project: Project Owner: Project Location: Sewershed: CSO: GI Technology:

FACT SHEET Green Improvement Fund: Tan A Grocery Store

Capture Area: Runoff Reduction: Year Contracted: GIF Award:

Tan A Grocery Store Private 414 Ash Street Clinton/Lower MIS 020 Underground Infiltration Basins and Added Green Space 11,990 sq. ft. 226,100 gal/yr 2016 $52,000

Project Description: The Tan A Grocery Store project, located at 414 Ash Street, was completed in 2017. This Green Improvement Fund project installed two underground infiltration basins to capture, store, and infiltrate stormwater runoff. This green infrastructure was part of a larger expansion of the Tan A Grocery Store. The project also included added green space areas that were formerly impervious and the addition of 6 new tree plantings. Highly infiltrating soils were present at the project site, and the green infrastructure was designed to Construction of the Underground Infiltration take advantage of these soils to maximize Basin stormwater capture. The two underground infiltration basins were constructed with stormwater chambers and infiltration stone. The chambers offer the advantage of high storage volume with a small footprint. The infiltration basins store over 1,200 cubic feet of stormwater. Additionally, approximately 2,300 square feet of green space was added around the project site in areas that were formerly impervious surfaces. In total, 11,990 square feet of impervious area is managed by this green infrastructure, capturing approximately 226,100 gallons of stormwater runoff annually in medium priority CSO 020. Version 12/28/2017

Added Greenspace

Roof Leader Disconnection to the Underground Infiltration Basin



METRO WWTP PHOSPHORUS PROJECTS /TMDL/AMBIENT MONITORING PROGRAM UPDATE



ACJ Quarterly Status Report – 4th Quarter 2017 METRO OPTIMIZATION PROJECT Construction began on the Metro Optimization project in October 2017. The plant is providing full secondary treatment while the improvements are made to the tertiary system. Full treatment will resume by April 2018 while construction will be proceeding in areas not requiring a tertiary treatment shut-down. Construction has been focused on improvements to provide chemical feed for polyaluminum chloride and construction of the channel divider wall to allow isolation of the biological aerator filter (BAF) treatment system.

AMBIENT MONITORING PROGRAM (AMP) Onondaga Lake Water Quality Monitoring Program Onondaga Lake Sampling Summary (October - December 2017) October 2017:  Lake Weekly sampling events: October 2, 16 and 19  Lake Biweekly sampling events: October 10 and 25 November 2017:  Lake Biweekly sampling event: November 28  Lake Quarterly sampling event: November 7

“Analysis of Phytoplankton Community Dynamics: Is Onondaga Lake at Risk for Cyanobacterial Blooms?” Cyanobacterial blooms, also known as blue-green algal blooms or harmful algal blooms (HABs) represent a serious threat to aquatic ecosystems and have become increasingly common in freshwater systems globally, including in many New York lakes. The NYSDEC Division of Water issued "water-bodies with blue-green algae notices" for several freshwater lakes in New York State during the summer of 2017. In New York, HABs have been documented in lakes with a range of phosphorus concentrations; many lakes experiencing cyanobacterial blooms have summer average total phosphorus (TP) concentrations well below the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) guidance value of 20 µg/L. Several waterbodies with blooms were listed by the NYSDEC on their Harmful Algal Blooms (HAB’S) notifications webpage in several locations in the state. These include Canandaigua Lake, Cayuga Lake, Conesus Lake, Honeoye Lake, Keuka Lake, Owasco Lake and Skaneateles Lake. Although cyanobacteria have not dominated the phytoplankton assembly in Onondaga Lake in recent years, they are always present in the phytoplankton assemblage. Nutrient enrichment, warming waters, invasive species and changing food webs have all been implicated as potential factors affecting cyanobacterial abundance.


Onondaga Lake, in contrast to nearby Oneida Lake and the Finger Lakes, has not exhibited cyanobacterial blooms in recent years, despite summer TP concentrations in the range of 20 – 30 µg/L. The attached white paper prepared by EcoLogic, WEP’s consultant examines the detailed water chemistry and biology data collected as part of the County’s AMP from decades of monitoring and research to explore why Onondaga Lake differs, and evaluates the risk of future HABs in this recovering ecosystem.

Tributary Water Quality Monitoring Program Tributary Sampling Event Summary (October – December 2017) October 2017:  Tributary Bacteria sampling events: October 9, 12 and 23  Tributary Biweekly sampling events: October 3 and 17 November 2017:  Tributary Biweekly sampling event: November 14  Tributary Quarterly sampling event: November 1 December 2017:  Tributary Biweekly sampling events: December 12 and 19

Tributary Bacteria Compliance (August - October 2017) Table 1 below summarizes the results of the bacteria compliance assessment for samples collected at the routine AMP sampling sites during the August through October tributary sampling events.

Table 1: AMP Tributary Bacteria Monthly Compliance Assessment1 (August - October 2017) Sampling Site Harbor Brook Harbor Brook at Velasko Road Harbor Brook at Hiawatha Boulevard Onondaga Creek Onondaga Creek at Tully Farms Road Onondaga Creek at Dorwin Avenue Onondaga Creek at Kirkpatrick Street Ley Creek at Park Street Ninemile Creek at Lakeland (Route 48) Bloody Brook at Onondaga Lake Parkway Tributary 5a at State Fair Boulevard Sawmill Creek at Onondaga Lake

August

September

October

√ X

√ X

√ X

X X X X √ √ X

X √ √ X X √ X

X √ X X √ √ X


Recreational Trail

X

X

X

1

Compliance assessed with the applicable NYS Ambient Water Quality Standard (AWQS) for Fecal Coliform bacteria in the surface water as set forth in 6NYCRR Part 703.4 as follows: “The monthly mean geometric mean, from a minimum of five examinations, shall not exceed 200.”

BIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM (October – December 2017) Sampling Summary (October)  Collected zebra mussel samples.  Started picking and sorting zebra mussel samples Sampling Summary (November)  Completed picking and sorting zebra mussel samples  Started picking and sorting larval fish samples Sampling Summary (December)  Continued picking and sorting larval fish samples

Invasive Round Goby and Rudd in Onondaga Lake

Round Goby Round Gobies were first collected in Onondaga Lake in 2010 and have continued to increase in abundance. Like Alewife they are preyed on by larger, fish-eating species and have been frequently observed being regurgitated by Largemouth Bass during electrofishing sampling events in Onondaga Lake. Round Gobies were the most common food source of Largemouth Bass in Onondaga Lake based on the analysis of 137 stomach samples collected between May and July 2013. Where abundant, Round


Goby can cause declines in native fish populations through their aggressive defense of nesting sites, predation on native fish and their eggs, and competition for food resource. Additionally, Round Gobies are capable of spawning every 18-20 days and may potentially do so up to six times during a breeding season. This reproductive pattern gives them an ecological advantage over native species, which usually spawn only once. Impacts of the Round Goby invasion of Onondaga Lake are uncertain. However, in the Great Lakes and other areas where the Round Goby has become established, they have had a severely negative impact on native benthic fish populations, such as the Mottled Sculpin and Logperch.

Rudd The first documented occurrence of Rudd in Onondaga Lake was in 1994 when three individuals were captured. Every year since 2008, SUNY ESF, as part of the Honeywell monitoring program, has captured Rudd in trap nets with increasing frequency. The number of Rudd collected increased from 12 in 2008 to a high of 315 in 2014. In 2016 the total catch decreased to 32 Rudd. Hybridization between Rudd and Golden Shiner is probable, and such hybridization could threaten the genetic integrity of Golden Shiner. Impacts on other native fishes are also a possibility. Small Rudd are vulnerable to predatory fish such as Northern Pike which select Rudd over Eurasian Perch, suggesting the potential to disrupt natural predator-prey relationships. This disruption may not necessarily be entirely negative since a preference for Rudd over other prey species by one predator may reduce competition among predators for other prey species. The other prey species may also benefit from reduced predation pressure if one or more predators shift their diets to include more Rudd. Competition with native fishes for food is also a concern. In New Zealand, young-of-year Rudd fed on zooplankton and chironomids and larger Rudd fed on benthic invertebrates but became increasingly herbivorous with increasing size Feeding on zooplankton and chironomids could lead to competition between Rudd and many native fishes during the fishes’ early life stages.


Analysis of Phytoplankton Community Dynamics: Is Onondaga Lake at Risk for Cyanobacterial Blooms? Thomas Vawter, Ph.D. Associate Scientist, EcoLogic LLC, Cazenovia NY

Executive Summary Harmful algal blooms (HABs) dominated by cyanobacteria are becoming increasingly common in freshwater systems globally, including in many lakes in the United States (Ho and Michilak 2015). Often such blooms occur in hypertrophic lakes and streams, and anthropogenic nutrient enrichment, especially by phosphorus, is usually seen as the principal driving factor. Indeed, efforts to reduce anthropogenic sources of phosphorus in lakes, rivers and streams of the United States in the late 1970s and 1980s led to improvement in nutrient conditions and reduction in the frequency of HABs, and, since then, the management of water quality has focused, therefore, principally on controlling total phosphorus (TP) concentrations. Before remediation began in Onondaga Lake, HABs were common, but with reduced inputs of phosphorus, resulting from advanced nutrient treatment at the Metropolitan Syracuse Wastewater Treatment Plant (Metro), major blooms were eliminated and minor blooms have occurred only infrequently. Nonetheless, renewed awareness of the manifold factors that affect HABs, the continued occurrence of HABs in nearby Oneida Lake, and increased occurrence in the New York Finger Lakes and Lake Erie suggest that it is prudent to investigate the likelihood of HABs returning to a recovering Onondaga Lake. Moreover, there is evidence from recent years that algal blooms are becoming more common in Onondaga Lake, and cyanobacteria are becoming more abundant. The recent increase in the frequency of HABs and their geographically widespread occurrence, including in oligotrophic, mesotrophic and eutrophic lakes, has spurred research into potential contributing factors other than the ambient phosphorus concentration. Although some of the apparent increase in the occurrence of HABs globally may be due to increased awareness of the public health threats of the toxic species that comprise many HABs, interest has focused as well on several biotic and abiotic factors. Among abiotic factors, nutrient enrichment remains a major focus, and, in some cases, excess phosphorus remains the principal culprit, perhaps more often coming from diffuse non-point sources resulting from changes in land-use, rather than from point sources such as wastewater treatment facilities. But inputs of other nutrients, especially nitrogen, or the relative amounts of two or more nutrients (stoichiometry) may also play a role. The light environment can also be important. Many cyanobacteria species—the most important component of HABs—use light more efficiently than do other phytoplankton species, especially under low-light conditions

White Paper: Potential HABs in Onondaga Lake 1


(Anneville et al. 2015, Filtstup et al. 2016). Furthermore, cyanobacteria can regulate their buoyancy and form surface concentrations that effectively reduce the transparency of the water, giving cyanobacteria an advantage over species lower in the water column. Increasing water temperatures and other climate interactions may also play an important role. Several cyanobacteria species have higher optimum temperatures for growth than do eukaryotic species, giving them an advantage in a globally warming climate. Biotic factors may also play a role through both “top-down” or indirect “bottom-up” effects in the food-web. Selective filtration by invasive zebra and quagga mussels (Dreissenidae) can lead to the dominance of at least some cyanobacteria in the phytoplankton assemblage (Vanderploeg et al. 2001), although under other circumstances dreissenid grazing can reduce cyanobacteria biomass (Waajen et al. 2016). Dreissenid mussel grazing may also affect the availability of phosphorus in the system, representing an indirect “bottom-up” effect, encouraging phytoplankton growth, including that of cyanobacteria. Predation by zooplanktivorous fish may have an important “top-down” effect of increasing phytoplankton biomass by relieving grazing. While cyanobacteria still comprise a small proportion of the phytoplankton community of Onondaga Lake, the fact that their relative abundance has recently increased coupled with the widespread occurrences both globally and in nearby New York waterbodies are of concern. Lake managers need to continue investigating the potential factors causing this increase.

Introduction Cyanobacterial blooms, also known as blue-green algal blooms or harmful algal blooms (HABs), have become increasingly common in freshwater systems globally, including in many New York lakes. Nutrient enrichment, warming waters, invasive species and changing food webs have all been implicated as potential factors affecting cyanobacterial abundance. In New York, HABs have been documented in lakes with a wide range of phosphorus concentrations; many lakes experiencing cyanobacterial blooms have summer average total phosphorus (TP) concentrations well below the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) guidance value of 20 µg/L. All eleven New York Finger Lakes and Oneida Lake experienced cyanobacterial blooms during summer 2017. Onondaga Lake, in contrast, has not had cyanobacterial blooms in recent years, despite summer TP concentrations in the range of 17 – 25 µg/L. This White Paper examines the detailed water chemistry and phytoplankton data from decades of monitoring and research to explore why Onondaga Lake differs, and evaluate the risk of future HABs in this recovering ecosystem.

Onondaga Lake Phytoplankton Community: History and Recent Changes As part of its long-term ambient monitoring program, Onondaga County Department of Environment Protection (OCDWEP) has sampled and analyzed the phytoplankton community, in addition to monitoring the algal pigment chlorophyll-a. Cyanobacterial blooms were common in Onondaga Lake prior to 2005, when advanced phosphorus removal came on line at the Metropolitan Syracuse Wastewater Treatment Plant (Metro). Between 1998 and 2004, cyanobacteria comprised a significant component of the phytoplankton community during the

White Paper: Potential HABs in Onondaga Lake 2


June to September recreational period (Figure 1). Implementation of advanced phosphorus treatment has led to a substantial decrease in both phytoplankton biomass and the proportional contribution of cyanobacteria to the community (Baker 2013).

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Figure 1. Percent of phytoplankton community biomass composed of cyanobacteria, June 1- Sept. 30.

The Onondaga County Ambient Monitoring Program uses chlorophyll-a concentration to indicate bloom conditions; 15 µg/L is the threshold for a “minor” bloom and 30 µg/L indicates a “major” bloom. There have been only minor blooms since 2005 (Figure 2), and none have been dominated by cyanobacteria. Some of these minor blooms have occurred in the spring when diatoms and green algae dominate the community.

100%

Minor bloom (>15 µg/L)

80%

Major bloom (>30 µg/L)

60% 40%

20%

no blooms

0%

90

92

94

96

98

00

02 04 Year

06

08

10

12

14

16

Figure 2. Summer algal bloom frequency, 1990-2016.

White Paper: Potential HABs in Onondaga Lake 3


Cyanobacteria are often present in the phytoplankton assemblage. The species detected in Onondaga Lake include the potentially toxic genera Anabaena, Dolichospermum (formerly Anabaena in part), Aphanizomenon, Microcystis, and Cylindrospermopsis. The major genera of cyanobacteria present in Onondaga Lake in 2016 are plotted in Figure 3.

450

Dolichospermum Aphanocapsa Other Pseudanabaena

Biomass (ug/L)

400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50

Nov-16

Oct-16

Sep-16

Aug-16

Jul-16

Jun-16

May-16

Apr-16

0

DATE (MM/YY) Figure 3. Major genera of cyanobacteria detected in Onondaga Lake, 2016

Although cyanobacteria have not dominated the phytoplankton assembly in recent years, there has been an increase in their total biomass and their proportional contribution to the community since 2012. On 18 sampling days between 6 April and 5 December 2016, the proportional contribution of cyanobacteria to the phytoplankton biomass varied from near zero to 39% (Figure 4 and Table 1) but was generally low overall, constituting only 11% of the open water phytoplankton biomass, except for a large biomass of Pseudoanabena (reaching 302 Âľg/L) on 9/27. During the two dates on which minor blooms occurred (9/13 and 9/27), the contribution of cyanobacteria was relatively high at 11% and 18%, respectively, but it was as high or higher on several other dates on which chlorophyll-a concentrations were low.

White Paper: Potential HABs in Onondaga Lake 4


Biomass (ug/L) of Phytoplankton Taxa

4000 3500 Other

3000

Pyrrhophytes

2500

Haptophytes

2000

Cyanobacteria

1500

Cryptophytes

1000

Crysophytes

500

Chlorophytes

0

Diatoms 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Biweekly Sampling Event (April - December 2016) Figure 4. Seasonal pattern of phytoplankton taxa, April - Dec. 2016

Table 1. 2016 Seasonal phytoplankton biomass (Âľg/L), upper waters (0-3m). Onondaga Lake NY Date

Diatoms

Greens

Chrysophytes

Cryptophytes

Cyanobacteria

6-Apr 19-Apr 10-May 17-May 8-Jun 21-Jun 6-Jul 19-Jul 2-Aug 16-Aug 30-Aug 13-Sep 27-Sep 11-Oct 26-Oct 8-Nov 30-Nov 5-Dec

181 151 72 74 96 95 5 72 20 78 185 645 518 87 25 3 70 46

28 8 10 20 9 34 55 70 203 78 101 371 266 191 42 46 11 28

19 0 10 74 1 3 1 102 62 4 23 307 114 27 3 4 9 0

81 55 31 234 184 108 73 397 389 185 182 592 486 298 113 901 140 69

2 1 75 67 133 0 109 2 2 35 98 398 371 118 27 1 1 1

Euglenoids & Misc. 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 930 0 0 15 0 0 0

Haptophytes

Pyrrhophyta

Total

7 33 73 127 79 69 38 2 276 274 630 315 233 70 6 2 1 0

12 22 2 9 22 255 0 32 0 192 15 156 68 122 0 3 0 4

331 274 273 604 524 565 282 677 951 846 1260 3714 2055 914 232 960 231 148

Percent cyanobacteria 1% 0% 28% 11% 25% 0% 39% 0% 0% 4% 8% 11% 18% 13% 12% 0% 0% 1%

Environmental Conditions That Encourage Cyanobacterial Growth Nutrient Stoichiometry The absolute or relative concentrations of nutrient elements other than phosphorus may contribute to the growth of cyanobacteria. For example, the ratio of nitrogen to phosphorus (TN:TP) may determine whether or not HABs occur, and HABs are thought to be rare in lakes where N:P ratios exceed 29:1 (by weight) (Filstrup et al. 2016, Smith 1983). This is partly because cyanobacteria can take up and use nitrogen more efficiently than true (eukaryotic) algae, thus potentially giving cyanobacteria a competitive advantage in conditions where the concentration of nitrogen becomes limiting. In fact, some cyanobacteria, unlike eukaryotic algae and plants, can

White Paper: Potential HABs in Onondaga Lake 5


“fix” atmospheric molecular nitrogen (N2) dissolved in the water. Nitrogen-fixing ability, however, is not the only attribute of cyanobacteria that can increase their competitive ability over other phytoplankton. Many non-Nfixing cyanobacteria species have superior nitrogen storage capacity, and Ferber et al. (2004) found that cyanobacteria had a small proportion of “fixed” N2, accumulating N in inorganic form, principally as ammonia but also as nitrate-. A review by Beutel et al. (2016) demonstrated that addition of nitrate to surface waters affects water-quality improvements by several routes, including the suppression of cyanobacteria in favor of eukaryotic algae, mostly greens. In an early Swedish study (Ripl and Lindmark 1979), addition of nitrate to a group of small quarry lakes converted the plankton community from one dominated by cyanobacteria and small-bodied zooplankton to one dominated by green algae and large-bodied zooplankton. In Onondaga Lake, nitrification of the Metro effluent began in 2004, greatly reducing the loading of ammonia to the lake and increasing the water-column concentration of nitrate by a factor of 2. This brought about several salutary effects on the lake’s water quality, including a late summer reduction in the mobilization of phosphorus from the sediments. Since 2011, concentrations of nitrate have been augmented by the addition of hypolimnetic calcium nitrate to prolong these effects. It is difficult to separate the reduction of phosphorus from the increase in nitrogen in their effects on the phytoplankton community, but, in addition to any effect on phytoplankton community structure, nitrate additions have reduced internal phosphorus loading, further curtailing eutrophication and the concomitant encouragement of HABs. It has also reduced the methylation of mercury in the sediments and its entrance into the food chain, and has improved water quality in several other ways.

Light In any given nutrient environment, cyanobacteria may realize a competitive advantage over other types of phytoplankton because of their more efficient use of light (Ferber et al. 2004, Kosten et al. 2012, Smith 1983, 1986). Not only do cyanobacteria grow more rapidly, especially under low-light conditions, but because they have buoyancy-regulating gas vacuoles, they rise to the surface and shade out other species, and because their buoyancy reduces their sinking rate, cyanobacteria remain in the well-lighted, upper level of the water column. As surface scums, cyanobacteria are also moved by wind-driven currents and may accumulate on leeward shores or protected embayments.

Climate Change There are several reasons to predict that global climate change will favor the growth of cyanobacteria in surface waters, leading to an increase in the frequency of HABs, and the increased frequency of HABs worldwide is likely not due solely to increased eutrophication (Mantzouki et al. 2016, Paerl and Otten 2016). The direct and indirect effects of warming may play an important role in changing the properties of aquatic ecosystems (Elliott 2012; Kosten et al. 2012; Paerl and Huisman 2008). Warmer waters directly favor cyanobacteria over eukaryotic algae because the optimal temperature for the growth of many cyanobacteria is greater than that for most algae species (Butterwick et al. 2005). Warmer surface water temperatures are also associated with more stable thermal stratification and less turbulent mixing.

White Paper: Potential HABs in Onondaga Lake 6


In addition, the thermocline in these warmed lakes will be shallower and more stable for a longer time, which can encourage the growth of certain cyanobacteria taxa (Paerl and Huisman 2008). Under stable water column conditions, positively buoyant cyanobacteria will be able to regulate their position in the water column and remain in the euphotic zone, while negatively buoyant algae will sink in the absence of turbulent mixing. The concentration of cyanobacteria in surface layers will shade levels beneath the surface, further enhancing the growth advantage of the cyanobacteria on the surface. Furthermore, dense light-absorbing aggregations of cyanobacteria near the surface will further warm the water, enhancing the dominance of the cyanobacteria. Dense phytoplankton growth can outstrip the supply of C, but buoyant cyanobacteria, closer to the surface will have better access to CO2 diffusing from the surface and to atmospheric CO2 that is continuing to increase. Other attributes of a changing climate may affect the occurrence of HABs. Intensified precipitation will lead to higher terrestrial nutrient-laden runoff, exacerbating eutrophication and further encouraging blooms. Other extreme events associated with global climate change may increase the likelihood of HABs. Heatwaves, for example, especially those accompanied by sunny calm weather conditions, have been associated with local cyanobacterial blooms.

Comparison to Oneida Lake Average summer values of chlorophyll-a concentrations and inferred phytoplankton densities in Oneida Lake are lower than those in Onondaga Lake, although total phosphorus concentrations in the two lakes are similar (Cuhel and Aguilar 2016). Oneida Lake is shallower than Onondaga Lake and more of its bottom is suitable for dreissenid mussel grazing. Nonetheless, large summer blooms of cyanobacteria and concentrations of cyanobacterial toxins over current health guidelines occur during the summer in Oneida Lake (Dr. Greg Boyer, personal communication 2017). One relevant difference between the two lakes with regard to cyanobacteria blooms is their different N:P ratios. It is well-documented that cyanobacteria dominate primarily in lakes with N:P ratios (by weight) below 29 (Smith 1983). The low proportion of cyanobacteria in Onondaga Lake is consistent with its elevated summer N:P ratio, which has been well above the 29:1 threshold since before 1998. This ratio has been very high, over 100:1 since 2007 (Figure 5). This is not the case in Oneida Lake, where summer N:P ratios are substantially lower. Between 2011 and 2016, the N:P ratio varies between 14 and 26 with summer minima between 6 and 15 (Rudstam 2017). Thus, N is more limiting in Oneida Lake giving cyanobacteria a competitive advantage. Other attributes potentially promoting cyanobacteria (total P concentrations, warmer temperatures, more stable water column, and increased P release from sediments) do not appear to be dramatically different in the two lakes.

White Paper: Potential HABs in Onondaga Lake 7


Average N:P Ratio Onondaga & Oneida Lakes 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0

Oneida

Onondaga

Figure 5. Average N:P ratio in Onondaga Lake (1998-2016) and Oneida Lake (2011-2016)

Lessons from Other Regional Lakes All the Finger Lakes have experienced cyanobacterial blooms, even oligotrophic lakes (e.g., Skaneateles), but HABs have become more common in Conesus, Honeoye, Canandaigua, Seneca, Owasco and Otisco Lakes. Although Honeoye is eutrophic, with TP between 30 and 45 µg/L, Cayuga, Seneca, Owasco and Otisco are mesotrophic (10<TP<20 µg/L). In 2017, HABs in eight Finger Lakes (Canandaigua, Cayuga, Keuka, Honeoye, Oneida, Owasco, Seneca, and Skaneateles Lakes) were associated with cyanobacterial toxins (http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/83310.html ). Cayuga and Owasco Lakes experienced HABs in mid to late summer in 2016 and 2017, and, in the case of Owasco Lake, cyanobacteria toxins were detected in the City of Auburn’s municipal water supply. Classification of the trophic status of these lakes is typically made from mid-lake sites, while the HABs typically occur in nearshore locations; cyanobacterial concentrations in blooms far exceed those of open-water. In certain areas, such as nearshore Conesus Lake (Makarewicz et al. 2009), nutrient-laden terrestrial runoff augments the ambient nearshore phosphorus concentrations. However, nearshore concentrations of nutrients in Onondaga, Cayuga, and Owasco Lakes are similar to pelagic values (D. Matthews, pers. com. 2017). Furthermore, the buoyancy-control of many cyanobacteria concentrates them in surface scums carried to nearshore locations by wind-driven currents. In Owasco Lake, the HABs occurred in mid-summer, when air and water temperatures were at their highest and abated when water temperatures decreased. The most intense blooms are typically associated with calm, sunny days, with maximum thermal stratification of the surface and little wind-induced mixing.

White Paper: Potential HABs in Onondaga Lake 8


Conclusions Clearly, the causes of cyanobacterial blooms are complex. While high concentrations of limiting nutrients, e.g., phosphorus, have been the principal culprit in hypertrophic and eutrophic bodies of freshwater, it is now clear that less productive waterbodies are not immune from HABs. Onondaga Lake is now less productive than it was before remediation was undertaken, and major algal blooms and the abundance of cyanobacteria has greatly declined. The N:P ratio of the upper waters appears to be a key indicator of risk of HABs, likely exacerbated by warming and more quiescent conditions. While the evidence from Onondaga Lake reviewed here does not suggest an imminent threat of cyanobacterial blooms, the recent increase in the importance of cyanobacteria in the lake’s phytoplankton community, the presence of toxic genera of cyanobacteria in Onondaga Lake, and the experience of HABs in nearby mesotrophic lakes suggest watchfulness.

References Anneville, O., I. Domaizon, O. Kerimoglu, F. Rimet and S. Jacquet (2015). Blue-green algae in a ‘‘greenhouse century’’? New insights from field data on climate change impacts on cyanobacteria abundance. Ecosystems 18(3):441–458 Baker, D. (2013). Recovery of a hypereutrophic urban lake (Onondaga Lake, NY): Implications for monitoring water quality and phytoplankton ecology. Master’s Thesis, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY. Beutel, M.W., R. Duvil, F.J. Cubas, D.A. Matthews, F.M. Wilhelm, T.J. Grizzard, D. Austin, A.J. Horne and S. Gebremariam (2016). A review of managed nitrate addition to enhance surface water quality. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 46:(7), 673-700. Butterwick, C., S.I. Heaney and J.F. Talling (2005). Diversity in the influence of temperature on the growth rates of freshwater algae, and its ecological relevance. Freshwater Biology, 50(2), 291-300. Cuhel, R. and C. Aguilar (2016). Nutrient dynamics and biogeochemical cycling in Oneida Lake. Pages 111138 in L.G. Rudstam, E.L. Mills, J.R. Jackson, and D.J. Stewart, editors. Oneida Lake: Long-term dynamics of a managed ecosystem and its fishery. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. Elliott, J. A. (2012). Predicting the impact of changing nutrient load and temperature on the phytoplankton of England's largest lake, Windermere. Freshwater Biology, 57(2), 400-413. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02717.x Ferber, L. R., S.N. Levine, A. Lini and G.P. Livingston (2004). Do cyanobacteria dominate in eutrophic lakes because they fix atmospheric nitrogen? Freshwater Biology, 49(6), 690-708.

White Paper: Potential HABs in Onondaga Lake 9


Filstrup, C. T., A.J. Heathcote, D.L. Kendall and J.A. Downing (2016). Phytoplankton taxonomic compositional shifts across nutrient and light gradients in temperate lakes. Inland Waters, 6(2), 234-249. doi:10.5268/iw6.2.939 Ho, J.C., and A.M. Michalak (2015). Challenges in tracking harmful algal blooms: A synthesis of evidence from Lake Erie. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 41(2), 317-325. Kosten, S., V.L.M. Huszar, E. Becares, L.S. Costa, E. van Donk, L.A. Hansson and M. Scheffer (2012). Warmer climates boost cyanobacterial dominance in shallow lakes. Global Change Biology, 18(1), 118-126. Makarewicz, J.C., T.W. Lewis, I. Bosch, M.R. Noll, N, Heredeen, R.D. Simon, J. Zollweg, and A. Vodacek. (2009). The impact of agricultural best management practices on downstream systems: Soil loss and nutrient chemistry and flux to Conesus Lake, New York, USA. J. Great Lakes Research. 35(Supplement 1): 23-36. Mantzouki, E., P.M. Visser, M. Bormans and B.W. Ibelings (2016). Understanding the key ecological traits of cyanobacteria as a basis for their management and control in changing lakes. Aquatic Ecology, 50(3), 333-350. doi:10.1007/s10452-015-9526-3 Paerl, H.W., and J. Huisman (2008). Blooms like it hot. Science 320: 57–58. Paerl, H.W. and T.G. Otten (2016). Dueling 'CyanoHABs': unravelling the environmental drivers controlling dominance and succession among diazotrophic and non-N-2-fixing harmful cyanobacteria. Environmental Microbiology, 18(2), 316-324. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.13035 Ripl, W. and G. Lindmark (1979). Impact of algae and nutrient composition on sediment exchange dynamics. Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie, 86(1), 45-65. Rudstam, L.G. (2017). Limnological data and depth profile from Oneida Lake, New York, 1975-present. Web Data on Knowledge Network for Biocomplexity. http://knb.ecoinformatics.org/#view/kgordon.35.83. Rudstam, L.G., E.L. Mills, J.R. Jackson, and D.J. Stewart, editors. (2016). Oneida Lake: Long-term dynamics of a managed ecosystem and its fishery. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. Smith, V.H. (1983). Low nitrogen to phosphorus ratios favor dominance by blue-green algae in lake phytoplankton. Science, 221(4611), 669-671. Smith, V.H. (1986). Light and nutrient effects on the relative biomass of blue-green-algae in lake phytoplankton. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 43(1), 148-153. doi:10.1139/f86-016. Vanderploeg, H., J. Liebig, W. Carmichael, M. Agy, T. Johengen, G. Fahenstiel and T. Nalepa (2001). Zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) selective filtration promoted toxic Microcystis blooms in Saginaw Bay (Lake Huron) and Lake Erie. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58(66):1208-1221.

White Paper: Potential HABs in Onondaga Lake 10


Waajen, G., N.C.B. Van Bruggen, L.M.D. Pires, W. Lengkeek and M. Lurling (2016). Biomanipulation with quagga mussels (Dreissena rostriformis bugensis) to control harmful algal blooms in eutrophic urban ponds. Ecological Engineering, 90, 141-150.

White Paper: Potential HABs in Onondaga Lake 11



LEGISLATIVE /REGULATORY / MEDIA UPDATE



Legislative/Regulatory Update Action Items for the County Legislature (October – December)   

 

 

   

Calling a Public Hearing in Connection with Proposals to Support Green and Innovative Infrastructure Projects to Benefit the Onondaga County Sanitary District. Calling a Public Hearing in Connection with Proposed Improvements for the Onondaga County Sanitary District for the Oak Orchard Wastewater Treatment Plant. Calling a Public Hearing in Connection with Proposed Improvements for the Onondaga County Sanitary District for the Ley Creek/Liverpool Force Main Replacement/Rehabilitation Project. Calling a Public Hearing in Connection with Proposed Improvements for the Onondaga County Sanitary District for Phase II of the Camillus Force Main Replacement Project. Approving Various Green and Innovative Infrastructure Projects Located Outside the Amended Consent Judgment Area as Outlined in Local Law 1-2011, for the Purpose of Mitigating Inflow and Infiltration of Stormwater into the Consolidated Sanitary District Sewer System. Approving Proposed Improvements for the Engineering Phase of the Ley Creek/Liverpool Force Main Replacement/Rehabilitation Project. Bond Resolution – Authorizing the Issuance of $2.3 Million Bonds to Pay the Costs of the Engineering Phase of the Ley Creek/Liverpool Force Main Replacement/Rehabilitation Project. Approving Proposed Improvements for the Onondaga County Sanitary District Consisting of Phase II of the Camillus Force Main Replacement Project. Bond Resolution – Authorizing the Issuance of $1.5 Million Serial Bonds to Pay the Costs of Improvements of the Camillus Force Main Replacement Project. Approving Proposed Improvements for the Onondaga County Sanitary District Consisting of the Oak Orchard WWTP Disinfection and Lagoon Cleaning Project. Bond Resolution – Authorizing the Issuance of $11.54 Million Bonds to Pay the Costs of Improvements Consisting of the Oak Orchard WWTP Disinfection and Lagoon Cleaning Project.

Action Items for the Environmental Protection Committee (January) 

None to report.


New York State Announces $86.4 Million in Economic and Community Development Resources Awarded to Local Areas Through 2017 Regional Council Competition December 15, 2017 On Wednesday December 13th, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo announced that more than $755 million in economic and community development funding has been awarded through Round VII of the Regional Economic Development Council initiative. A centerpiece of the Governor’s strategy to jumpstart the economy and create jobs, the Regional Councils were established in 2011 to replace the state’s old topdown approach to economic development, with one that is community-based and performance-driven. The initiative empowers community, business, and academic leaders, as well as members of the public in each region of the state, to develop strategic plans specifically tailored to their region’s unique strengths and resources in order to create jobs, improve quality of life and grow the economy. […] Local Award award highlights include: Cogeneration Units at Metropolitan WWTP Onondaga County Department of Water Environment Protection will construct improvements at the Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant, located in Syracuse on the eastern shore of Onondaga Lake, that will allow the plant to utilize methane gas produced as a result of accepting food waste into its digestion system. Work will include installation of two cogeneration units to convert excess methane into electricity, reducing electricity dependence from the grid. Onondaga County Onondaga Lake Waterfront Planning Onondaga County Onondaga County will prepare a Feasibility Study for beach access along the eastern shore of Onondaga Lake, design Reports for the 2.8-mile gap in the County’s Loop-the-Lake Trail spanning from the end of the Onondaga Creekwalk behind the Destiny USA Mall to the northern tip of the lake, and a Market Analysis including public visioning for redevelopment of county-owned waterfront properties. Onondaga County South Salina Street Green Corridor Onondaga County will transform multiple blocks of South Salina Street into a green street corridor to prevent combined sewer overflows from discharging to Onondaga Creek and Onondaga Lake. Bioretention and stormwater street trees will be used to infiltrate stormwater along the corridor before it enters the existing combined sewer system. Syracuse City Ballet Administrative Workforce Expansion Syracuse City Ballet will hire a Community Youth Outreach and Education Coordinator to expand the company’s ability to provide education enhancing ballet and dance programs to children in Central New York, with a focus on children living in poverty and those with disabilities. La Roasteria, Inc., dba Café Kubal Headquarters and Roastery Expansion La Roasteria, Inc., dba Café Kubal, which operates cafés in the Syracuse area, will acquire and renovate http://www.urbancny.com/new-york-state-announces-more-than-755-million-in-economic-and-communitydevelopment-resources-awarded-through-2017-regional-council-competition/


an existing building at 208 N. Townsend St. and an adjacent parking lot in the City of Syracuse, Onondaga County in order to relocate and expand its coffee roastery and operations functions from its current location in Syracuse, and to create an employee training center. Onondaga Learning Disabilities Association of Central New York, Inc. Career Solutions Academy Learning Disabilities Association of Central New York, Inc. will provide a Career Solutions Academy (CSA) to enable participants to earn a Cleaning Technician credential from the Cleaning Management Institute (CMI).

http://www.urbancny.com/new-york-state-announces-more-than-755-million-in-economic-and-communitydevelopment-resources-awarded-through-2017-regional-council-competition/


See luxury apartments at former Syracuse lantern factory

By Rick Moriarty Decemeber 27, 2017

Syracuse, N.Y. -- The old Dietz lantern factory in Syracuse has come back to life as luxury apartments and commercial space. Owner Larry Losty Jr. and his son-in-law, Matthew Paulus, have completed a $33 million redevelopment of the former R.E. Dietz Co. factory at 225-303 Wilkinson St. in Syracuse's Park Avenue neighborhood. The upper three floors of the four-story building contain 92 apartments (71 onebedroom, 18 two-bedroom and three three-bedroom units). The first floor contains 50,000 square feet of commercial space. Amenities include basement parking, a fitness center and a business center for use by tenants, and a pet-washing station. Monthly rents at Dietz Lofts range from $1,200 to $2,650, with the average rent about $1,650.

http://www.syracuse.com/businessnews/index.ssf/2017/12/see_luxury_apartments_at_former_syracuse_lantern_factory.html


Located next to Leavenworth Park, the 208,000-square-foot Dietz factory was built in the late 1800s and underwent several expansions in the early 1900s. By the 1960s, it employed approximately 600 people. Losty bought the building from the Dietz family after the factory closed in 1992 and operated his office furniture business, Superior Office Interiors, out of a portion of it while he planned the building's redevelopment. "Twenty years ago, I had the vision, but this is better than I ever imagined," he said. About 75 percent of the apartments are leased. Jacobsen Oriental Rugs and Carpets, O Yoga Studio, Daniel Manning Architect and Walton Architectural Group are commercial tenants. Paulus said the building is attracting tenants who want to be close to downtown but also have the convenience of basement parking and a city park to take a stroll or walk their dogs. "The building has all of the amenities and conveniences of being near downtown without being downtown," he said. In a nod to the structure's industrial past, Losty and Paulus have re-created the Dietz factory's painted signs on the front of the building. And the common areas on the first floor contain displays of Dietz lanterns loaned to the project by the Onondaga Historical Association. The state is providing the project with a $900,000 grant through its Regional Economic Development Council initiative. In addition, Onondaga County is providing a $517,000 grant through its Save the Rain program. The project also is eligible for state and federal historic preservation tax credits.

http://www.syracuse.com/businessnews/index.ssf/2017/12/see_luxury_apartments_at_former_syracuse_lantern_factory.html


Connect the Drops

Summary September 2017 through Nov 2017, since the digital campaign resumed, the Save the Rain website have seen the following results. Total sessions:

5,728 Block Litter Landing page – 1,544

Average Pages/Session:

2.00 Block Litter Landing Page – 1.08

Average Session Duration:

1:29 Block Litter – 0:39

Bounce Rate:

60.88% Block Litter – 57.05%

The Save the Rain website has seen a 51% increase in sessions, 8.16% increase new users and a 23.19% increase in page views

The Block Litter landing page website has seen a 9.82% increase in sessions

The Facebook page has increased to 3,018 page likes, an increase of 24.9% since July.

The "Sign-up for Block Litter" Facebook lead generation ad has resulted in 342 leads between July and November.

Facebook and Instagram ads have generated 981sessions to the Block Litter landing page between Sept and November.

Facebook ads also resulted in 91 form completions on the Block Litter landing page.

The Weather triggered Block Litter ads resulted in 1,460 sessions since they began running in late October. 1,133 from Google Display and 327 from Facebook.

The reverse litter video resulted in 308 sessions to the savetherain.us website.

Save the Rain Facebook ads have resulted in 7 sessions to the savetherain.us website.

Metrics below are for the three months, September – November 2017.


Block Litter Creative 09/01/2017 - 11/30/2017 (compared to 06/01/2017 - 08/31/2017)





Connect The Drops Creative 09/01/2017 - 11/30/2017 (compared to 06/01/2017 - 08/31/2017)




Google Analytics - Summary 09/01/2017 - 11/30/2017 (compared to 06/01/2017 - 08/31/2017) OVERVIEW SESSIONS

Sessions

Sessions Trendline

1,200

900

600

300

0

08/29/17

09/05/17

09/12/17

SESSIONS

09/19/17

09/26/17

10/03/17

10/10/17

10/17/17

PAGEVIEWS

ALL TRAFFIC

7,663

14,342

51%

23.19%

PREVIOUS: 5,075

PREVIOUS: 11,642

10/24/17

10/31/17

11/07/17

PAGES / SESSION

11/14/17

11/21/17

AVG. SESSION DURATION

1.87

1:16

PREVIOUS: 2.29

PREVIOUS: 1:50

-18.41%

-31.17%

TOP TRAFFIC ALL USERS

CHANNELS ▲

SESSIONS

NEW USERS

BOUNCE RATE

PAGES / SESSION

AVG. SESSION DURATION

Organic Search

▲32.19% 1,889 vs 1,429

▲42.51% 1,304 vs 915

▲8.58% 57.60% vs 53.04%

▼-10.18% 2.80 vs 3.12

▼-13.99% 2:37 vs 3:03

Direct

▲1.70% 1,853 vs 1,822

▲2.06% 1,586 vs 1,554

▼-2.38% 82.41% vs 84.41%

▲1.43% 1.57 vs 1.55

▼-13.31% 0:53 vs 1:01

Display

▲152.90% 1,439 vs 569

▲154.81% 1,218 vs 478

▼-12.46% 68.31% vs 78.03%

▼-5.17% 1.18 vs 1.24

▼-33.62% 0:23 vs 0:35

Social

▲204.80% 1,143 vs 375

▲252.33% 983 vs 279

▲5.15% 80.75% vs 76.80%

▼-15.75% 1.49 vs 1.77

▼-42.28% 0:41 vs 1:11

Referral

▲0.41%

▲27.91%

▲30.91%

▼-30.71%

▼-39.11%

741 vs 738

472 vs 369

56.41% vs 43.09%

2.66 vs 3.84

1:52 vs 3:05

▲326.43% 597 vs 140

▲291.91% 533 vs 136

▲8.46% 68.17% vs 62.86%

▲11.35% 1.30 vs 1.16

▲45.08% 0:36 vs 0:25

(Other)


CHANNELS ▲

Paid Search

SESSIONS

▼-50.00% 1 vs 2

NEW USERS

▼-100.00% 0 vs 1

BOUNCE RATE

▼-100.00% 0.00% vs 100.00%

PAGES / SESSION

0.00% 1.00 vs 1.00

AVG. SESSION DURATION

∞ 0:19 vs 0:00

TOP SOCIAL NETWORK REFERRALS ALL USERS

SOCIAL NETWORK ▲

SESSIONS

PAGE VIEWS

AVG. SESSION DURATION

PAGES / SESSION

GOAL CONVERSION RATE

Facebook

▲891.49% 932 vs 94

▲420.33% 1,280 vs 246

▼-79.57% 0:34 vs 2:46

▼-47.52% 1.37 vs 2.62

▼-94.96% 0.11% vs 2.13%

YouTube

▼-37.05% 141 vs 224

▼-25.36% 209 vs 280

▲75.30% 0:42 vs 0:23

▲18.58% 1.48 vs 1.25

∞ 2.13% vs 0.00%

Twitter

▲236.36% 37 vs 11

▲445.16% 169 vs 31

▲366.97% 4:12 vs 0:54

▲62.07% 4.57 vs 2.82

0.00% 0.00% vs 0.00%

Pinterest

▼-30.23% 30 vs 43

▼-59.57% 38 vs 94

▼-94.17% 0:06 vs 1:50

▼-42.06% 1.27 vs 2.19

0.00% 0.00% vs 0.00%

Instagram

∞ 2 vs 0

∞ 3 vs 0

∞ 0:54 vs 0:00

∞ 1.50 vs 0.00

0.00% 0.00% vs 0.00%

Blogger

0.00% 1 vs 1

▼-75.00% 1 vs 4

▼-100.00% 0:00 vs 1:41

▼-75.00% 1.00 vs 4.00

0.00% 0.00% vs 0.00%

Weebly

▼-100.00% 0 vs 1

▼-100.00% 0 vs 1

0.00% 0:00 vs 0:00

▼-100.00% 0.00 vs 1.00

0.00% 0.00% vs 0.00%

Yammer

▼-100.00% 0 vs 1

▼-100.00% 0 vs 6

▼-100.00% 0:00 vs 6:41

▼-100.00% 0.00 vs 6.00

0.00% 0.00% vs 0.00%


TOP EVENTS SESSIONS

EVENT CATEGORY ▲

TOTAL EVENTS

UNIQUE EVENTS

EVENT VALUE

AVG. VALUE

Scroll Depth

▲122.75% 1,087 vs 488

▲123.64% 1,069 vs 478

0.00% 0 vs 0

0.00% 0.00 vs 0.00

External Link

▲202.94% 103 vs 34

▲168.75% 86 vs 32

0.00% 0 vs 0

0.00% 0.00 vs 0.00

Connect the Drops - Logo

▲52.17% 70 vs 46

▲45.95% 54 vs 37

0.00% 0 vs 0

0.00% 0.00 vs 0.00

Non-Linked Click Attempt

▲141.18% 41 vs 17

▲30.00% 13 vs 10

0.00% 0 vs 0

0.00% 0.00 vs 0.00

Connect the Drops -Offpage Link

▲13.33% 34 vs 30

▲25.93% 34 vs 27

0.00% 0 vs 0

0.00% 0.00 vs 0.00

Connect the Drops - IntroButton

▲40.91% 31 vs 22

▲47.62% 31 vs 21

0.00% 0 vs 0

0.00% 0.00 vs 0.00

Connect the Drops -ScrollTo Nav

▼-46.43% 15 vs 28

▼-50.00% 12 vs 24

0.00% 0 vs 0

0.00% 0.00 vs 0.00

Connect the Drops -Social Link

0.00% 6 vs 6

▼-16.67% 5 vs 6

0.00% 0 vs 0

0.00% 0.00 vs 0.00

Copied Text

▲150.00% 5 vs 2

▲150.00% 5 vs 2

0.00% 0 vs 0

0.00% 0.00 vs 0.00


TOP CAMPAIGNS SESSIONS

SOURCE / MEDIUM

SESSIONS ▼

NEW USERS

BOUNCE RATE

PAGES / SESSION

AVG. SESSION DURATION

(direct) / (none)

▲1.70% 1,853 vs 1,822

▲2.06% 1,586 vs 1,554

▼-2.38% 82.41% vs 84.41%

▲1.43% 1.57 vs 1.55

▼-13.31% 0:53 vs 1:01

google / organic

▲30.52% 1,719 vs 1,317

▲42.34% 1,190 vs 836

▲10.68% 58.41% vs 52.77%

▼-12.96% 2.75 vs 3.16

▼-14.57% 2:38 vs 3:05

google / cpc

▲152.19% 1,440 vs 571

▲154.28% 1,218 vs 479

▼-12.60% 68.26% vs 78.11%

▼-5.11% 1.18 vs 1.24

▼-33.39% 0:23 vs 0:35

m.facebook.com / referral

▲1,693.48% 825 vs 46

▲1,743.90% 756 vs 41

▲22.14% 84.97% vs 69.57%

▲0.93% 1.29 vs 1.28

▼-31.24% 0:26 vs 0:39

ongov.net / referral

▼-17.48% 472 vs 572

▼-0.38% 260 vs 261

▲28.48% 48.52% vs 37.76%

▼-25.22% 3.15 vs 4.22

▼-32.58% 2:14 vs 3:19

Facebook / weatherbased

∞ 327 vs 0

∞ 290 vs 0

∞ 61.77% vs 0.00%

∞ 1.46 vs 0.00

∞ 0:44 vs 0:00

Facebook / VideoCarousel

▲155.56% 161 vs 63

▲141.27% 152 vs 63

▼-1.74% 70.19% vs 71.43%

▲1.38% 1.06 vs 1.05

▲471.35% 0:31 vs 0:05

youtube.com / referral

▼-37.05% 141 vs 224

▼-38.29% 108 vs 175

▼-14.99% 70.21% vs 82.59%

▲18.58% 1.48 vs 1.25

▲75.30% 0:42 vs 0:23

bing / organic

▲35.23% 119 vs 88

▲27.12% 75 vs 59

▼-30.49% 39.50% vs 56.82%

▲43.18% 3.82 vs 2.67

▼-3.47% 2:45 vs 2:51

Facebook / Promoted Post

▲850.00% 95 vs 10

▲680.00% 78 vs 10

▲26.32% 88.42% vs 70.00%

▲12.63% 1.13 vs 1.00

▲442.11% 0:19 vs 0:03


Facebook - Summary 09/01/2017 - 11/30/2017 (compared to 06/01/2017 - 08/31/2017) LIKES

ONONDAGA COUNTY SAVE THE RAIN

3,018

PREVIOUS: 2,551

18.31% LIMITED TO A 90-DAY PERIOD


LIKE SOURCES

ONONDAGA COUNTY SAVE THE RAIN LIKE SOURCES â–²

LIKES

Sponsored Story

294

Ads

72

Feed Story

55

Page Profile

47

Page Timeline

8

Pagelike Adder For Reactivated Users

7

Mobile

3

Banhammer

2

Wap

1

Hovercard

1 LIMITED TO A 90-DAY PERIOD


PAGE POSTS

ONONDAGA COUNTY SAVE THE RAIN DATE â–²

POST

LIKES

COMMENTS

REACH

2017-11-14 15:31:39

-

2

--

336

2017-11-07 13:06:17

Rid your neighborhood of litter, before it makes...

11

--

2,207

2017-11-03 10:36:20

-

2

--

420

2017-10-31 08:20:03

A rainy day can wash litter into our lakes and...

30

4

13,952

2017-10-30 09:34:30

Thanks to all who came out for the Onondaga...

16

--

450

2017-10-29 09:14:02

It may be raining, but you can still help our...

32

--

8,727

2017-10-26 13:56:13

-

2

--

379

2017-10-26 08:03:27

Help the Save the Rain team plant 80+ trees this...

3

1

417

2017-10-24 15:03:13

-

3

--

--

2017-10-23 14:25:35

-

7

--

593

2017-10-23 09:43:33

Join Onondaga County Save the Rain, Onondaga...

85

3

8,912

2017-10-21 12:56:21

-

8

--

738

2017-10-21 10:30:10

-

5

--

623

2017-10-16 17:07:30

Thanks to all who joined us for the...

5

--

782

2017-10-06 08:52:54

-

2

--

380

2017-10-05 15:12:35

Thanks to Baltimore Woods Nature Center, Carrier...

9

--

506

2017-09-20 07:00:01

Trees make communities greener in more ways than...

379

13

14,734

2017-09-18 18:05:32

-

12

2

--

2017-09-18 13:45:19

Did you see our partners from Baltimore Woods...

5

--

344

2017-09-18 12:58:07

Thanks to all who joined us for the annual Save...

2

--

204

2017-09-14 12:59:33

Come to the Save the Rain Clean Water Fair for a...

8

--

303

2017-09-11 10:40:14

Did you know there are at least 53 species of...

3

--

272

2017-09-07 10:25:13

Come to Save the Rain's #CleanWaterFair on 9/16 &...

3

--

239

2017-09-05 16:49:40

#RainyDays mean you can see our Block Litter...

6

--

512

2017-09-01 11:16:09

Use rain barrels at your home to collect...

310

38

30,104

LIMITED TO A 90-DAY PERIOD


Facebook Ads - Overview 09/01/2017 - 11/30/2017 (compared to 06/01/2017 - 08/31/2017) IMPRESSIONS

CLICKS

1,227,288

11,746

FACEBOOKADS

CTR

FACEBOOKADS

PREVIOUS: 501,690

FACEBOOKADS

0.96%

PREVIOUS: 4,659

144.63%

PREVIOUS: 0.93%

152.11%

3.06%

PERFORMANCE

40,000

Page Likes Spend Trendline

Page Likes Trendline Spend: Prev.

Page Likes: Prev. Spend: Prev. Trendline

Page Likes: Prev. Trendline Reach Reach Trendline

Spend Reach: Prev.

1/2

30,000

20,000

10,000

0 09/01/17

09/08/17

09/15/17

09/22/17

09/29/17

10/06/17

10/13/17

10/20/17

10/27/17

11/03/17

11/10/17

11/17/17

11/24/17


Facebook Ads - Overview 09/01/2017 - 11/30/2017 CAMPAIGNS FACEBOOKADS

NAME â–²

CTR

REACH

PEOPLE TAKING ACTION

Block Litter 2017 Video views

0.59%

15,054

7,204

Block Litter_Starter Kit_Lead generation

1.53%

32,307

955

STR _CTD_Weather Based_2017

1.32%

33,477

612

STR Tree Planting Event 2017-Engagement

1.91%

6,830

264

STR Tree Planting Post -2017 engagement

0.89%

2,343

29

STR_BL_Starter Kit_Instagram_June_Traffic

0.20%

6,853

72

STR_BL_Starter Kit_June_Traffic

0.59%

65,656

1,081

STR_BlockLitter_Business_Instagram_Engagement

0.09%

5,887

394

STR_BlockLitter_Business_PP_Engagement

2.01%

15,921

571

STR_BlockLitter_YouthGroup_FB_PP_Traffic

0.71%

9,413

261


AD SETS

FACEBOOKADS NAME

CTR â–²

REACH

SPEND

PEOPLE TAKING ACTION

ENDS

PP Tree Planting 2017_Remarketing_

0.00%

5

$0.00

--

11/30/2017

STR_CTD_Bag Leaves_PP_Remarketing

0.00%

28

$0.39

--

11/30/2017

STR_BlockLitter_Moms_Instagram

0.05%

2,286

$22.50

16

11/30/2017

CTD Video Carousel - Instagram

0.07%

17,698

$1,129.14

10,524

11/30/2017

STR_BlockLitter_YouthGroup_Instagram

0.08%

2,289

$13.75

18

11/30/2017

STR_BlockLitter_Instagram_Business

0.09%

5,887

$248.01

394

11/30/2017

STR_BL_Starter Kit_Instagram_Interest Targeting

0.20%

6,853

$130.36

72

11/30/2017

STR Weather Ads_General Retargeting

0.29%

6,176

$54.43

65

11/30/2017

CTD Video Carousel

0.40%

26,509

$2,925.94

12,040

11/30/2017

STR_BL_Starter Kit_Interest Targeting

0.54%

40,861

$1,225.00

554

11/30/2017


ADS

FACEBOOKADS LINK CLICKS â–²

TOTAL ACTIONS

LIKE

PAGE ENGAGEMENT

POST SHARES

POST COMMENTS

STR Post Engagement-Tree Planting 2017

--

14

--

14

1

--

STR Post engagement_Tree Planting 2017

--

--

--

--

--

--

Business - Engagement

11

419

--

419

1

1

Post: "" - Engagement

14

313

17

313

31

3

CDT - Video Carousel - Instagram

14

27,714

--

27,714

--

--

Business - Engagement

140

681

52

681

54

12

Clean Water Event

2

6

--

4

--

--

rain barrels- Engagement

2

5

--

5

--

1

Onondaga County Save the Rain - Traffic - Copy

21

77

--

77

--

2

Onondaga County Save the Rain - Traffic

211

320

18

320

5

6

NAME


FINANCIAL UPDATE



Financial Update Contracts New Contracts   

Annual Green Structures Contract with J&J Landscaping, LLC for landscaping of green infrastructure at various project locations within Onondaga County. Contract amount per task up to $1,006,180. Executed: 10/31/17.

Amendments to Existing Contracts 

None to Report.

Change Orders 

None to Report.

1


Funding Grants State Bond Act Funds  Reimbursements requested: None  Reimbursements received: None Federal EPA Funds  Reimbursements requested: None  Reimbursements received: None Federal Army Corps of Engineers Funds  Reimbursements requested: None  Reimbursements received: None 

GIGP Grants Requested: None Received: None

EFC Reimbursements Requested: Midland LT $3,483,562.88 on 9/27/17 EFC Reimbursements Received: Midland LT $3,483,562.88 on 11/14/17

Total reimbursement monies received to date through EFC loans for the funded ACJ projects: $247,603,598 (short term) and $124,336,239 (long term).


Onondaga County Lake Improvement Project 4th Stipulation of the ACJ Clinton/Lower MIS CSO Improvements Summary of Current and County Authorizations Total Project Costs Expended To Total Proposed Budget 12/31/17

Project/Task/Line Item Clinton Street CSO Facility Planning (Original) Engineering Services (EEA) $ Original Facility Plan Subtotal $

751,266 751,266

$ $

751,266 $ 751,266 $

Clinton Street CSO Conveyances Project Contract No. 1 - Phase 1 Conveyances (Delaney) Contract No. 2 - Phase 2A Conveyances (Delaney) Engineering/Construction Services (CDM/C&S) Conveyances Subtotal

$ $ $ $

14,478,053 4,074,455 2,738,000 21,290,508

$ $ $ $

14,478,053 4,074,455 2,738,000 21,290,508

Clinton Storage Project (1) Construction Estimate Engineering Services (EEA and others) Construction Management and Administration (CDM/C&S) Construction Testing (CME)

$ $ $ $

77,742,858 12,122,013 4,833,411 327,847

$ $ $ $

79,831,600 11,925,712 4,521,602 277,716

CSO Storage Subtotal $

95,026,129

$

Facility Plan for CSOs 027 & 029 Construction Estimate Engineering Services (Ch2MHill) Engineering Services (TBD) Floatables Arcadis County Administration and Other Costs Facility Plan Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $

Clinton/Lower MIS Green Implementation Program Construction Contracts incl. GIF Public/Private $ Ch2MHill Program Management & Engineering $ Green Subtotal $ Program Management Project Management (CDM/C&S) Project Management for Facility Plan (CDM/C&S) (2) $ Program Management Subtotal $ Miscellaneous County Costs Land Acquisition IMA Legal Consulting (John Clare & Mezey) Debt Other Contingency

Authorized Budget 185,500,042

Authorization Remaining

(0) (0)

$ $ $ $

(0) (0) 0 (0)

$ $ $ $ $ 96,556,631 $

(2,088,742) 196,301 311,809 50,131 (1,530,502)

$

$ 91,186 $ 12,816 $ $ 104,001 $

3,100,000 25 769,216 3,869,242

38,508,611 $ 15,900,000 $ 54,408,611 $

32,655,367 $ 11,728,454 $ 44,383,821 $

5,853,244 4,171,546 10,024,790

3,100,000 91,211 782,032 3,973,243

$ $

-

$

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ Miscellaneous Subtotal $

3,726,350 4,861,000 126,115 301,334 234,885 310,738 489,863 10,050,285

$ $ $ $ $ $

$

185,500,042

$

$

-

$ $ $

3,726,350 3,959,746 350,857 226,334 879,337 740,944

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ 9,883,567 $ 172,969,795

$

-

901,254 (224,742) 75,000 (644,452) (430,206) 489,863 166,718 12,530,247


Onondaga County Lake Improvement Project 4th Stipulation of the ACJ Harbor Brook Drainage Basin CSO Abatement Summary of Current and Proposed Costs, and County Authorizations Total Project Costs Total Proposed Budget

Project /Task/Line Item

Expended to 12/31/17

Authorization Remaining

Harbor Brook CSO Abatement Project Original Engineering Expenses

$

5,500,000

$

5,500,000

$

HBIS Replacement and CSO Abatement Project Construction Contract No. 1 (1) (JJ Lane) Other Miscellaneous Work Engineering/Construction Sevices (CDM/C&S) County Administration and Other Costs

$ $ $ $

18,289,918 2,482,920 2,012,615 114,547

$ $ $ $

23,391,425 2,651,315 953,749

$ $ $ $

(5,101,507) 2,482,920 (638,700) (839,202)

HBIS Replacement and CSO Abatement Project Total $

22,900,000

$

26,996,490

$

(4,096,490)

$ $ $ $ $ $

34,502,000 4,200,000 3,390,000 2,280,000 44,372,000

$ $ $ $ $ $

29,279,884 3,971,487 4,600 1,497,536 5,360,579 40,114,086

$ $ $ $ $ $

5,222,116 228,513 (4,600) 1,892,464 (3,080,579) 4,257,914

$ $ $ $ FCF Program Total $

12,000,000 1,878,731 800,000 400,000 15,078,731

$ $

144,843 15,300

$

160,143

$ $ $ $ $

12,000,000 1,733,888 784,700 400,000 14,918,588

Lower Harbor Brook Storage & Conveyance Construction Estimate (with contingency) Engineering Services (EEA) Barton & Loguidice (flood plain dev permit) Engineering Services (CDM/C&S) Project Escalation to Midpoint of Construction Lower Harbor Brook Storage & Conv Total Harbor Brook CSOs FCF Program Construction Estimate Engineering Services (Arcadis) County Administration and Other Costs Project Escalation to Midpoint of Construction

Other Harbor Brook Green Construction Contracts incl. GIF Public/Private & Rain Barrels O'Brien & Gere Wetlands disinf project CH2MHILL Cso 018 Monitoring Ch2MHill Engineering & Program Management Harbor Brook Green Project Total

-

$ $ $ $ $

13,000,000 3,650,000 16,650,000

$ $ $ $ $

16,671,697 6,406 45,064 6,500,795 23,223,962

$ $ $ $ $

(3,671,697) (6,406) (45,064) (2,850,795) (6,573,962)

Program Management Project Management (CDM/C&S) $ Project Management for FCF Plan Implem (CDM/C&S) $ Program Management Total $

499,269 499,269

$

2,813,628

$

(2,314,359)

$

2,813,628

$

(2,314,359)

Harbor Brook Mitigation

$

3,500,000

$

3,265,000

$

235,000

Total Costs for Harbor Brook CSO Area under 4th Stip

$

108,500,000

$

102,073,309

$

6,426,691


Onondaga County Lake Improvement Project 4th Stipulation of the ACJ Midland CSO Abatement Summary of Current and Proposed Costs, and County Authorizations

Total Project Costs Total Proposed Budget

Project /Task/Line Item Midland Ave. RTF & Conveyances Midland Phase 1 Conveyances - Construction Midland Phase 2 RTF & Conveyances - Construction Midland Demolition Contracts - Construction Other Construction Phase 1 and 2 Engineering (Parsons & EEA) CME Construction Testing RTF Modifications (Construction, Eng, CM, Admin) Facility Plan Total

Expended to 12/31/17

Authorization Remaining

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

(0) (0) 0 658 2,213,810 7,526 3,000,000 5,221,994 5,221,994

$ $ $ $ $ $

197,887 (1,330) 20,776 217,332 217,332

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

1,836,434 53,372,689 748,483 137,000 14,717,163 227,341 3,000,000 74,039,110

$ $ $ $ $ $

1,836,434 53,372,689 748,483 136,342 12,503,353 219,815

$

68,817,116

$ $ $

12,296,549 64,800 750,000

$ $ $

12,098,662 66,130 729,224

$

13,111,349

$

12,894,017

FCF Facility Plan Construction Estimate Engineering Services (Arcadis and others) Construction Management and Administration Project Escalation to Midpoint of Construction Clinton Storage Project Total

$ $ $ $ $

1,300,000 623,954 210,000 2,133,954

$ $

46,039

$ $ $

1,300,000 577,915 210,000

$

46,039

$ $

2,087,915 2,087,915

Facility Plan for Midland CSOs Construction Estimate Engineering Services (Ch2MHill) Engineering Services, County Admin, ect (TBD) Facility Plan Total

$ $ $ $

14,900,000 121,401 3,720,000 18,741,401

$ $ $ $

121,368 121,368

$ $ $ $ $

14,900,000 33 3,720,000 18,620,033 18,620,033

9,500,198 $ 3,165,114 $ 12,665,311 $ $

(2,000,198) 752,522 (1,247,675) (1,247,675)

CSO 044 Conveyances Project Contract No. 6. - JJ Lane Construction Contingency 5% Engineering Services (EEA) Construction Management Sevices (CDM/C&S) see below Conveyances Project Total

Midland Green Implementation Program Construction Contracts incl. GIF Public/Private $ Ch2MHill Program Management & Engineering $ Clinton Green Program Total $ Program Management Project Management (CDM/C&S) includes CSO 044 $ Project Management for Facility Plan (CDM/C&S) (1) Program Management Total $

Miscellaneous County Costs Land Acquisition IMA Legal Consulting (John Clare & Mezey) Debt Contingency Other

7,500,000 $ 3,917,636 $ 11,417,636 $

6,641,383 6,641,383

$

(110,781)

6,530,602

$ $ $

$ $

(110,781) (110,781)

$

1,809,802

$

1,809,802

$

$ $ $ $ $ Miscellaneous Costs Total $

182,323 194,317 635,031 2,591,117 526,211 5,938,801

$ $ $ $ $

$181,975 194,317 746,035 529,813 3,461,941

$ $ $ $ $ $

348 0 (111,004) 2,591,117 (3,602) 2,476,860

131,912,853

$

$

27,265,677

Total Cost for Midland project under 4th stipulation

Authorized Master Budget $128,300,000

$

6,530,602

104,647,176

-


Onondaga County Lake Improvement Project 4th Stipulation of the ACJ Sewer Separation of CSO Areas 022/038/040/045/046A/046B/047/048/050/051/053/054 Summary of Current and Proposed Costs, and County Authorizations

Total Proposed Budget

Project /Task/Line Item Sewer Separation Construction Contracts CSO 024 (Falter) CSO 053/054 (Falter) CSO 038//40/046A/046B (Falter) CSO 047/048 (Falter) CSO 050 (Lane) CSO 051 (Lane) CSO 022/045 (estimated Project Costs)

Total Project Costs Expended to Date 12/31/17

Authorization Remaining

Construction Total

$698,864 $2,000,817 $3,598,931 $1,654,022 $4,362,188 $5,037,280 $6,750,000 $24,102,102

$698,864 $2,000,817 $3,524,487 $1,654,022 $4,362,188 $5,037,280 $5,611,423 $22,889,082

$0 $0 $74,444 $0 $0 $0 $1,138,577 $1,213,020

Service Contracts (Engineering /Consulting /Program Management) ACE CDM/C&S CME Department of the Army Spectra Engineering/Management Total

$484,286 $1,446,468 $109,492 $153,504 $437,996 $2,631,746

$484,286 $1,997,539 $49,704 $153,504 $437,996 $3,123,029

$0 -$551,071 $59,788 $0 $0 -$491,283

$569,885

$15,928

$457,077

Green Subtotal

$569,885

$15,928

$457,077

Miscellaneous Costs Total

$135,084 $101,425 $116,269 $14,235 $13,540 $380,553

$135,084 $101,425 $142,816 $14,235 $4,093 $397,652

$0 $0 -$26,547 $0 $9,447 -$17,099

Total

$27,684,286

$26,425,692

$1,161,715

Green Implementation Program Construction Contracts incl. GIF Public/Private

Miscellaneous County Costs City of Syracuse Consulting (John Clare & Mezey) Debt Legal Other


Onondaga County Lake Improvement Project Save The Rain Education and Outreach Grant Summary of Current and Additional Costs, and County Appropriations Dec 2017

Funding Sources

Appropriations

Program Funding 09,10,11 Appropriations 2011 Suburban Green Infrastructure 2012 Appropriation 2011 Trolley Lot Parking Mitigation Appropriation* 2012 Green grant education 2013 Green Grant education 2014 Green Grant education 2015 Green Grant education 2016 Green Grant education 2017 Green Grant education Total Appropriation

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

875,000 200,000 400,000 125,000 200,000 400,000 400,000 100,000 185,000 185,000

$

3,070,000

Funding Uses Contract Amount

Retz Advertising + Design 2010/2011 Marketing Services 2012 Marketing Services Marketing Services Subtotal

$ $ $

411,789 224,303 636,092

Expended to Date $ $ $

411,789 224,303 636,092

Difference + (-)

$

(0)

Contract Amount $ 100,155 $ 110,212 $ 49,937 $ 13,040 $ 22,601 $ 7,937 $ 303,882

Expended to Date $ 84,510 $ 70,623 $ 27,024 $ 2,833 $ 22,601 $ 20,000 $ 227,590

SubTotal

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

21,000 4,000 1,200 5,200 3,000 1,000 4,000 60,614 100,014

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

10,131 78 1,359 35 2,022 50,328 63,953

Education & Outreach Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $

346,677 241,815 237,758 350,126 1,176,376

$ $ $ $ $

346,677 241,815 237,758 350,125 1,176,376 $

$ $ $ $ $

13,590 26,731 4,055 48,282 47,336

$ $ $ $ $

9,987 24,373 1,220 47,944 40,612

$ $ $ $ $

3,603 2,358 2,835 339 6,724

Baltimore Education & Outreach $

139,995

$

124,136

$

15,859

Environmental Finance Center Education and Outreach Environmental Finance Center Staff Onondaga Environmental Institute ESF Onondaga Earth Corps Baltimore Woods Nature Center Purchased Services (ASLF) SubTotal Non-Labor Expenses (EFC) Printing-Outreach Postage Travel Facilities Rental Program-related Supplies - Other Web -based Marketing Efforts Training Supplies and Materials Indirect/Overhead

2011 Education and Outreach 2012 Education and Outreach 2013 Education and Outreach 2014 Education and Outreach

Difference + (-)

0

Baltimore Woods Supplies Transport Travel Env Educator Hours Administrative Hours

Contract Amount

Miscelaneous Ed/Outreach Expenses 2010/2011 Miscellaneous Exp. 2012 Miscellaneous Exp. 2013 Miscellaneous Exp 2014 Miscellaneous Exp 2015 Miscellaneous Exp 2016 Miscellaneous Exp 2017 Miscellaneous Exp

$ $ $ $ $ $ $

105,764 79,852 34,158 46,657 20,988 48,494 245,612

Travel Purchase card/Petty cash Endeavor entertainment Mahar bus forms Paiges seeds AVI Consulting Catering A SMG (meeting room) RV Hall ent Minority Reporter All Times Publishing Lamar Party Rental Enter Melody Wilkinson Galaxy Comm

MOST Focus Greater Syr OEI - RB Workshops Pinckney Hugo Grp Environmental Design and Research 2010/2011 media 2012 Media

Miscellaneous Subtotal

STR Education and Outreach Totals

Remaining Balance

Expended to Date $ $ $ $ $ $

105,764 79,852 34,158 46,657 20,988 48,494

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

1,100 650 2,540 2,430 496 1,998 740 300 225 1,240 1,125 2,687 432 1,705

Difference + (-)

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

25,000.00 20,000 40,761 400,000 20,000 28,750 1,500 -

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

17,375 31,067 308,717 20,000 28,750 1,500 -

$

$

1,117,536

$

760,990

$

Contract Amount

Expended to Date

$

$

3,070,000

2,697,594

356,546

Difference + (-) $

372,405

$

372,405



APPENDIX



December 2017 FINANCIAL TRACKING SUMMARY: FEDERAL & STATE GRANTS/LOANS APPROVED & RECEIVED

PROJECT NAME METRO - CURRENT AERATION SYSTEM UPGRADE AMMONIA REMOVAL DEMO BIOSOLIDS-MECHANICAL THICKENERS(c ) DIGESTER MOD/CHEMICAL STORAGE DIGITAL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS ODOR CONTROL AMMONIA REMOVAL FULL SCALE/ STAGE II PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL PILOT PHOS TREAT OPTIMIZATION (587601) CSO - CURRENT CLINTON ST CONVEYANCE & RTF ERIE BLVD SEW SEP STORAGE FRANKLIN ST FCF HARBOR BROOK FCF HARBOR BROOK CSO ABATEMENT (a) HIAWATHA INTERCEPTOR/RTF KIRKPATRICK ST PUMP STATION MALTBIE ST FCF MIDLAND AVE CONVEYANCE MIDLAND AVE PHASE II & RTF MIDLAND AVE PHASE III MIDLAND AVE MITIGATION COSTS (b) NEWELL ST FCF ONONDAGA CREEK FCF SEWER SEPARATION(a) SIPHON REHABILITATION TEALL BROOK FCF WEST ST SEWER SEPARATION OTHER AMBIENT WATER MONITORING OXYGENATION DEMO SEQR REGULATORY TOTAL DOLLARS

PROJECT BUDGET

NYS GRANT APPROVED

NYS GRANT RECEIVED

FED EPA GRANT APPROVED

FED EPA GRANT RECEIVED

SHORT-TERM SHORT-TERM LONG-TERM LONG-TERM ACE EFC LOAN EFC LOAN EFC LOAN EFC LOAN GRANT APPROVED RECEIVED APPROVED RECEIVED APPROVED

$8,500,000 $2,000,000

$5,834,381 $1,145,109

$5,834,381 $1,145,109

$7,365,000 Full-Scale

$6,868,954 $202,078

$5,600,000 $2,900,000 $1,400,000 $7,700,000

$4,319,819 $1,563,317

$4,319,819 $1,563,317

$4,938,419 $1,849,000

$4,938,419 $1,849,000

$190,000,000 $5,000,000

$47,331,203

$47,331,203

$31,245,000 $3,000,000 $3,200,000 $250,000 $5,444,000 $8,000,000 $5,642,000 $250,000 $3,000,000 $45,000,000 $27,000,000

$54,870,000 $1,700,000 $3,828,053 $384,200 $3,880,000

$54,870,000 $1,700,000 $3,828,053 $384,200 $3,880,000

$7,502,302 $211,097 $26,055,238

$7,502,302 $211,097 $26,055,238

$1,310,000 $3,000,000 $7,704,000 $1,230,000 $175,000 $1,000,000

$367,737 $442,154

$367,737 $442,154

$870,768 $1,045,162 $2,299,460

$870,768 $1,045,162 $2,299,460

$54,705,015

$14,003,569

$34,900,616

$54,705,015

$15,378,304

$1,049,185

$14,613

$14,676,422 $775,509 $285,682

$14,711,148 $154,126 $3,833

$7,413,199

$7,389,197

ACE GRANT RECEIVED

$108,000,000 Full Scale

$105,860,930 $1,936,991

$17,200,000

$989,323

$70,288,890 $2,301,876 $4,726,762

$41,834,264 $2,094,314 $4,589,759

$53,689,500

$46,700,136

$12,000,000 $212,000

$10,940,632 $188,106

$78,568,119 $923,162 $1,179,012 $343,500 $62,477,416 $2,710,169 $4,246,376

$39,896,650 $216,543 $296,823 $348,596 $26,113,432 $37,749 $828,115

$15,000,000 $10,000,000

$15,000,000

$37,339,317

$23,901,044

$1,024,433 $1,094,139 $2,481,443

$11,332,407 $140,623 $188,809 $395,540

$10,276,648 $1,958 $5,743 $6,621

$14,050,177 $14,050,177

$1,435,500 $1,236,594 $3,059,716

$247,603,598 $241,244,447 $125,192,161

$17,456,177 $17,456,177

$3,406,000

$3,406,000

$33,525,880

$8,000,000 $2,400,000 $50,000 *$380,000,000

$163,650,000 $163,650,000 $103,609,200 $103,609,200

*Original budget figures were based on 1997 dollars NYS includes awards beyond original pledge (i.e. civic strip) (a) NOTE: PROJECT IS US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS PROJECT (b) NOTE: PROJECT RECEIVED $40,500 COST SHARE GRANT FROM (NYSERDA) (c )NOTE: PROJECT RECEIVED $87,500 COST SHARE GRANT FROM (NYSERDA)

$296,103,257


Lake Improvement Project Status Report For The Period Ending 12/31/2017

ACJ START DATE

Project Title

ACJ FINISH DATE

COUNTY FINISH DATE

ORIGINAL BUDGET(2)

AUTHORIZED BUDGET

ENGINEER

METRO - Current 1 AERATION SYSTEM UPGRADE 2 AMMON. REMOVAL DEMONSTRATION

11/1/1998

7/1/2002

01/03/00 $

8,500,000 $

3/1/2000

12/31/99 $

2,000,000 $

3 BIOSOLIDS - MECHANICAL THICKENERS

$

6,925,115 EEA

1

1,347,187 EEA

2

14,815,674

3

4 DIGESTER MOD/CHEMICAL STORAGE

7/1/2002

10/31/00 $

5,600,000 $

5,092,545 C&S

4

5 DIGITAL SYSTEMS IMPROVEMENTS

7/1/2002

06/31/01 $

2,900,000 $

3,520,317 Systems Integrated

5

6 MISCEL. IMPROVEMENTS

7/1/2002

01/31/99 $

1,400,000 $

1,400,000

6

7,700,000 $

8,393,855 OBG

7

$

128,688,040 EEA

8

5,000,000 $

4,111,714 EEA

9

$

2,840,000 GHD

$

185,500,042 EEA

7 ODOR CONTROL 8

7/1/2002

12/20/00 $

AMMONIA REMOVAL FULL SCALE/

10/1/2001

11/1/2003

11/01/03 $

125,000,000

STAGE II PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL

10/1/2003

4/1/2005

$

65,000,000

4/1/2006

4/1/2007

12/31/00 $

9 PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL - PILOT PHOSPHORUS OPTIMIZATION (587601) CSO - Current 10

CLINTON ST. CONVEYANCE/

5/1/2003

5/1/2007

10/28/06 $

15,987,190

CLINTON ST. RTF

5/1/2007

1/1/2012

12/28/10 $

15,258,090

7/1/2002

04/13/02 $

3,000,000 $

2,684,523 Barton & Loguidice

11

11 ERIE BLVD STORAGE SYSTEM 12 FRANKLIN ST. FCF

5/1/2000

05/01/00 $

3,200,000 $

4,948,516 EEA

12

13 HARBOR BROOK FCF

7/1/2002

07/01/02 $

250,000 $

889,109 EEA

13

14 HARBOR BROOK CSO ABATEMENT

7/1/2002

$

5,443,980 $

(3)

7/1/2002

12/31/00 $

8,000,000 $

16 KIRKPATRICK ST. PUMP STATION

7/1/2002

10/29/02 $

5,641,860 $

8/31/1998

7/1/2002

04/26/99 $

5/1/1999

5/1/2004

12/06/00 $

20 NEWELL STREET RTF

7/1/2002

07/01/01 $

1,310,000 $

473,132 Moffa & Assoc.

20

21 ONONDAGA CREEK FCF

7/1/2002

07/01/02 $

3,000,000 $

648,342 Parsons

21

22 SEWER SEPARATION

1/1/2012

01/01/12 $

7,703,880 $

27,684,286 OBG

22

23 SIPHON REHABILITATION

7/1/2002

06/11/99 $

1,230,000 $

1,026,391 C&S

23

7/1/2002

12/01/01 $

175,000 $

1,235,346 EEA

24

01/14/00 $

1,000,000 $

2,720,572 CHA

25

15 HIAWATHA INTERCEPTOR/RTF

4/26/1999

10

17 MALTBIE STREET FCF 18 MIDLAND AVE RTF & CSO ABATEMENT

25 WEST ST SEWER SEPARATION

6,047,183 EEA/Parsons

15 16

250,000 $

362,028 EEA

17

75,000,000 $

131,912,853 EEA

18

$

5/1/1999

14

12,558,335 EEA

19 MIDLAND AVE MITIGATION COSTS

24 TEALL BROOK FCF

108,500,000 Moffa & Assoc.

3,000,000

26 ERIE BLVD CSO ABATEMENT

19

New Project

26

OTHER 27 AMBIENT WATER MONITORING(4) 28 OXYGENATION DEMO PROJECT

5/1/1999

7/1/2002

$

4/1/2003

02/25/04 $

29 SEQRA REGULATORY COMPLIANCE(1)

$

TOTAL DOLLARS (2)

* $

*Original budget figures were based on 1997 dollars (1) SEQR costs are reflected in the individual projects under total payments to date (2) Original budget figures were based on 1997 dollars (3) Hiawatha project costs did not all appear on county account partial ACE (4) AMP is paid through operating funds not in projects

A-3

8,000,000 2,400,000 $

27 10,087

50,000

380,000,000 $

28 Parsons

667,335,192

29


Lake Improvement Project Status Report For The Period Ending 12/31/2017

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AMOUNTS

SOFT COST CONTRACTS

$

352,747 $

6,473,110

TOTAL PAYMENTS TO DATE

$

TOTAL ESTIMATED COST

FORECASTED COSTS

6,925,115

$

6,925,115 $

OVER/UNDER BUDGET

% COMPLETED EXPENDITURES

(1,574,885)

100.00%

(652,813)

100.00%

$

1,346,856

$

1,347,187

$

1,347,187 $

$

1,266,345 $

13,131,105

$

14,815,674

$

14,815,674 $

$

748,386 $

4,357,480

$

5,092,545

$

5,092,545 $

(507,455)

100.00%

$

451,713 $

2,974,514

$

3,520,317

$

3,520,317 $

620,317

100.00%

$

1,400,000

$

1,400,000 $

14,815,674

693,855

100.00%

100.00%

$

999,299 $

6,956,868

$

8,393,855

$

8,393,855 $

100.00%

$

21,289,868 $

106,962,810

$

128,688,040

$

128,688,040 $

(61,311,960)

100.00%

$

4,111,714 $

(888,286)

100.00%

$

4,055,734

$

4,111,714

$

1,749,597

$

1,389,809 $

22,805,191 $

24,195,000 $

24,195,000

5.74%

12,530,097 $

185,500,042 $

154,254,762

93.25%

$

34,294,218 $

127,115,744

$

172,969,945 $

$

901,556 $

1,734,929

$

2,684,523

$

2,684,523 $

$

973,543 $

3,920,238

$

4,948,516

$

4,948,516 $

1,748,516

100.00%

$

436,363 $

373,370

$

889,109

$

889,109 $

639,109

100.00%

$

22,748,443 $

77,385,459

$

102,073,308 $

6,426,692 $

108,500,000 $

103,056,020

94.08%

540,945

$

5,535,152

$

6,047,183

$

9,453,183 $

1,453,183

63.97%

2,520,394 $

9,882,154

$

12,558,335

$

12,558,335 $

6,916,475

100.00%

$ $ $

109,483 $

152,418

$

362,028

$

26,070,792 $

75,550,125

$

104,647,177 $

$

3,000,000 $

$

472,572

$

473,132

$

503,551

$

648,342 26,425,692 $

$

(315,477)

100.00%

$

362,028 $

112,028

100.00%

27,265,676 $

131,912,853 $

56,912,853

79.33%

$

3,000,000 $

3,000,000

100.00%

$

473,132 $

(836,868)

100.00%

$

648,342 $

(2,351,658)

100.00%

-

2,600,778 $

22,879,464

$

1,258,594 $

27,684,286 $

$

1,021,823

$

1,026,391

$

1,026,391 $

19,980,406 (203,609)

95.45% 100.00%

$

320,039 $

903,566

$

1,235,346

$

1,235,346 $

1,060,346

100.00%

$

403,332 $

2,311,126

$

2,720,572

$

2,720,572 $

1,720,572

100.00%

$

-

$

(2,389,913)

100.00%

$

$

10,087

125,166,639 $

469,621,456

$

22,077,709 $

$

10,087

$

640,481,651 $

-

$

10,087 $

70,286,250 $

692,096,192 $

A-4

320,146,192


December 2017

Project Title

TOTAL PAYMENTS TO DATE 12-31-17

TOTAL PAYMENTS TO DATE 9-30-17

Change

METRO - Current 1 AERATION SYSTEM UPGRADE

$

6,925,115

$

6,925,115

$

-

2 AMMON. REMOVAL DEMONSTRATION

$

1,347,187

$

1,347,187

$

-

3 BIOSOLIDS - MECHANICAL THICKENERS

$

14,815,674

$

14,815,674

$

-

4 DIGESTER MOD/CHEMICAL STORAGE

$

5,092,545

$

5,092,545

$

-

5 DIGITAL SYSTEMS IMPROVEMENTS

$

3,520,317

$

3,520,317

$

-

6 MISCEL. IMPROVEMENTS

$

1,400,000

$

1,400,000

$

-

7 ODOR CONTROL

$

8,393,855

$

8,393,855

$

-

8 AMMONIA REMOVAL FULL SCALE/

$

128,688,040

$

128,688,040

$

-

STAGE II PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL

$

-

$

-

9 PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL - PILOT

$

4,111,714

$

4,111,714

$

PHOSPHORUS OPTIMIZATION

$

1,389,809

$

667,173

$

CSO - Current 10 CLINTON ST. CONVEYANCE/ CLINTON ST. RTF

$ $ $

172,969,945 -

$ $

172,765,191 -

$

722,637 204,754

$

-

11 ERIE BLVD STORAGE SYSTEM

$

2,684,523

$

2,684,523

$

-

12 FRANKLIN ST. FCF

$

4,948,516

$

4,948,516

$

-

13 HARBOR BROOK FCF

$

889,109

$

889,109

$

-

14 HARBOR BROOK CSO ABATEMENT

$

102,073,308

$

101,947,028

$

15 HIAWATHA INTERCEPTOR/RTF

$

6,047,183

$

6,047,183

$

-

16 KIRKPATRICK ST. PUMP STATION

$

12,558,335

$

12,558,335

$

-

17 MALTBIE STREET FCF

$

362,028

$

362,028

$

-

18 MIDLAND AVE RTF & CSO ABATEMENT

$

104,647,177

$

103,367,532

$

19 MIDLAND AVE MITIGATION COSTS

$

3,000,000

$

3,000,000

$

-

20 NEWELL STREET RTF

$

473,132

$

473,132

$

-

21 ONONDAGA CREEK FCF

$

648,342

$

648,342

$

-

22 SEWER SEPARATION

$

26,425,692

$

26,415,790

$

9,902

23 SIPHON REHABILITATION

$

1,026,391

$

1,026,391

$

-

24 TEALL BROOK FCF

$

1,235,346

$

1,235,346

$

-

25 WEST ST SEWER SEPARATION

$

2,720,572

$

2,720,572

$

-

26 ERIE BLVD CSO ABATEMENT

$

$

-

$

-

-

$

-

OTHER

126,280

1,279,645

27 AMBIENT WATER MONITORING

$

22,077,709

$

22,077,709

$

-

28 OXYGENATION DEMO PROJECT

$

10,087

$

10,087

$

-

29 SEQRA REGULATORY COMPLIANCE

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

TOTAL DOLLARS

$

640,481,651

$

638,138,434

$

2,343,217


Chronology of Project Construction Starts Status

Location

Complete Complete

Metro Metro

Digital Systems Upgrade Ammonia Removal Demonstration Aeration System Upgrade Hiawatha RTF - ACOE Newell St. RTF Demo/Improvements Maltbie St. FCF Siphon Rehab

Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete

Metro Metro Metro Regional Market W.Newell/Vale St. Maltbie/Plum St. Various

Digester Modifications/Chemical Storage Franklin St. FCF West Street Sewer Separation

Complete Complete Complete

Ammonia Trackdown

Complete

Metro I-690/Franklin W. Genesee, Plum, Tracy, N. West St. Metro

Midland Ave. Conveyance Phase I Phosphorus Removal – Phase I Pilot

Complete Complete

Tallman/Oxford St. Metro

Erie Blvd. Storage System Upgrade Full Scale Ammonia Removal/ Stage II Phosphorus Removal Kirkpatrick St. Pump Station & Force Main Onondaga Creek FCF Teall Brook FCF Water Street Sewer Separation (CSO 024)

Complete

Franklin to Teall

Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete

Metro Kirkpatrick St. Inner Harbor Teall Ave. Water Street

Harbor Brook FCF Brighton Ave Sewer Separation (CSO 053/054)

Complete Complete

W.Hiaw./I-690 Brighton/Bishop Ave

Pre-ACJ Signing (1/20/98) General Improvements Odor Control and Residuals Handling

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002


Project

Status

Location

Tallman/Onondaga Sewer Separation (CSO 038, 040, 046A &046B) Midland Phase II RTF/Conveyances

Complete

Tallman/Onondaga

Complete

Blaine/Oxford St.

Phosphorus Removal – Phase II Pilot Biosolids Handling Improvements

Complete Complete

Metro Metro

Sewer Separation – CSO 047 & 048

Complete

South Ave/ Bissell St.

Sewer Separation – CSO 050 Clinton Phase I Conveyances

Complete Complete

Parkway/Rockland

Clinton Phase IIA Conveyances

Complete

Sewer Separation – CSO 051

Complete

Colvin St.

Harbor Brook Interceptor Sewer

Complete

Velasko/Fayette

Midland CSO 044 Clinton Storage Facility Lower Harbor Brook (Conveyance & Storage) Save the Rain Green Projects CSO 022 Sewer Separation Project CSO 045 Sewer Separation Project

Complete Complete Complete Authorized/Underway Authorized/Underway Authorized/Underway

W. Castle/South Ave Armory Square Hiawatha/State Fair Blvd. Various West Genesee/Franklin South Avenue

Save the Rain Green Projects

Completed

Various

Save the Rain Green Projects

Completed

Various

Save the Rain Green Projects Harbor Brook CSO 063 Conveyances Project

Completed Underway

Various Hiawatha/State Fair Blvd.

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014


CONTRACTORS FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Metro Treatment Plant AERATION SYSTEM UPGRADE Bongiovanni Construction (General) Ridley Electric (Electrical)

$ 5,626,956.41 $ 846,154.00

DIGITAL SYSTEM UPGRADE Systems Integrated

$ 2,974,514.27

ODOR CONTROL CONTRACT #1 Falconet, Inc. (General) Scriba Electric (Electrical) Burns Bros. (Heating/Ventilation) Burns Bros. (Plumbing)

$ 4,872,660.53 $ 315,580.30 $ 82,459.00 $ 50,168.00

ODOR CONTROL CONTRACT #2 Murnane Construction

$ 1,636,000.00

PHASE III IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT 1 - DIGESTER & LAGOON IMPROVEMENTS Maxim Construction

$

645,730.74

PHASE III IMPROVEMENTS CONTACT 2 - CHEMICAL STORAGE & FEED FACILITIES C.O. Falter Construction Corp. (General) Barry & Barry Electrical Co. (Electrical) Burns Bros. (HVAC) Edward Joy Company (Plumbing)

$ 2,527,300.08 $ 193,665.22 $ 224,232.51 $ 38,669.35

PHASE III IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT 3 - DIGESTER & LAGOON CLEANING Waste Stream Environmental Inc.

$

727,881.80

$ $ $ $

28,388.00 112,224.00 32,295.00 18,440.00

FULL SCALE AMMONIA/PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL - FIELD OFFICE James & Son Construction Resun Leasing, Inc. Ridley Electric Co. Burns Brothers

FULL SCALE AMMONIA/PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL U.S. Filter - Kruger Products, Inc. U.S. Filter - Kruger Products, Inc.

$ 8,261,182.00 $ 3,918,080.00


CONTRACTORS FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Metro Treatment Plant FULL SCALE AMMONIA/PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL SITE PREPARATION - CONTRACT 2 C.O. Falter Construction Corp. (General) Ridley Electric (Electrical) C.O. Falter Construction Corp. (Pile Testing) Moretrench Environmental

$ 22,243,604.98 $ 255,627.00 $ 431,008.00 $ 4,602,086.57

PILE INSTALLATION - CONTRACT 3 M.A. Bongiovanni Construction

$ 9,045,731.95

GENERAL - CONTRACT 4 The Pike Company (General) Ridley Electric Co. (Electrical) Edward Joy Company (HVAC) Burns Brothers (Plumbing/Fire Protection)

$ $ $ $

46,860,263.46 6,927,238.00 3,009,057.61 1,217,583.74

BIOSOLIDS HANDLING IMPROVEMENTS C. O. Falter Construction Corp. (General) Ridley Electric (Electrical) Airside Technology (HVAC) Burns Bros. (Plumbing) Independent Field Svs (Cogen)

$ 10,929,016.19 $ 1,476,223.00 $ 532,187.00 $ 173,679.09 $ 18,019.75

CSO's CLINTON CONVEYANCES PHASE I & 2A The Delaney Group, Inc. The Delaney Group, Inc. SIDA MOU (City of Syracuse) MOU City of Syracuse (Connective Corridor)

$ 14,478,053.39 $ 4,074,455.32 $ 2,634,999.43 $ 168,000.00 $3,825,000.00

CLINTON CSO ABATEMENT Ruston Paving (Farmers' market Lot) Davis Wallbridge (Pearl St/Lot 3) Davis Wallbridge (Townsend St.) J&B (Pirro Conv. Center) C.O. Falter (War Memorial) Ridley (War Memorial) Economy Paving (On Center) J&B (Erie Canal Museum) Jett Industries (Clinton Storage) Joy Process Mechanical (Cistern War Memorial) C&S Technical (Cistern War Memorial) Green Culture (Rain Barrels) Syracuse Utilities (Duct Bank) Water Cooling Corp. (Storage Tank)

$ 188,046.14 $ 635,873.93 $ 476,625.39 $ 1,083,727.39 $ 692,298.87 $ 447,957.66 $ 1,094,119.49 $ 73,480.00 $ 79,762,239.12 $ 82,615.00 $ 233,652.56 $ 44,335.50 $ 59,982.56 $ 2,875.00


CONTRACTORS FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS CSO's (cont) MOU City of Syracuse (Road Reconstruction) MOU City of Syracuse (Dr. Weeks) MOU City of Syracuse (Bank Alley) MOU City of Syracuse (Upstate) Wallbridge (Streetscape/Water St) Ruston Paving (Sunnycrest Parking Lot) MA Bongiovanni Inc. Acts II Construction (Skiddy Park) D.E. Tarolli (Otisco Street) Orchard Earth & Pipe (Syr School dist Park Lot) Slate Hill Construction (E. Water St) Davis Wallbridge (Onon Cty Pub Library) Tumbers, Schichtels Nursery (Trees), Martisco, Dixie, Pro Scapes Acts II (Seymour Academy) Paul R. Vitale (City Lot 4) John R. Dudley (Leavenworth Park) VIP (Onon Public Library) Ballard Construction (Westcott Comm Ctr) Cornerstone Paving (Oswego St) John Dudley Construction (W. Onondaga St.) Barrett Paving (W. Fayette St.) Davis Wallbridge (Westcott St.) ProScapes (Sunnycrest Arena) & C&S Sweeping Acts II (E. Washington St) John R. Dudley (690 Downspout) Josall (Maganelli Comm Ctr) Spectra (Butternut Circle) Barton & Loguidice (State St) D E Tarolli (annual green) J&J Landscape (annual green) King & King Architects (GIF) Jefferson Clinton Commons (GIF) ESF Foundation, Abby Lane Housing (GIF) Hotel Skyler (GIF) Near West Side Initiatives, Inc. (GIF) Near West Side Initiatives, Inc. (GIF) Tash Taskale (GIF) St. Lucy's Church (GIF) Putnam Properties (GIF) Centro (GIF) 500 W. Onondaga St. Inc. (GIF) CNY Jazz Arts Foundation (GIF) Jim & Juli Boeheim Foundation (GIF) Home Headquarters, Inc. (GIF) Galleries of Syr, 147 E. Onondaga St. (GIF) Syracuse Housing (GIF)

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

638,997.06 89,000.00 108,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,432,437.86 410,372.20 3,000.00 550,916.44 1,847,459.81 430,172.42 147,952.84 320,291.95 991,497.10 373,309.00 607,852.44 719,311.20 51,382.74 52,500.00 109,046.54 1,371,475.75 588,982.07 870,263.89 89,441.47 155,591.53 597,965.65 378,400.00 65,640.00 159,400.00 2,099,385.19 297,362.48 100,000.00 100,000.00 78,000.00 100,000.00 22,730.69 78,000.00 100,011.00 125,000.00 75,757.00 65,390.00 52,740.00 52,188.00 163,203.51 40,500.00 100,000.00 120,290.00


CONTRACTORS FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS CSO's (cont) Kopp Billing Agency (GIF) CNY Philanthropy (GIF) American Beech (GIF) Park Central Presbyterian Church (GIF) Loon Creek (GIF) NHW Syracuse (GIF) McMahan/Ryan Child Advocacy (GIF) Jeffrey DeRoberts (GIF) Bethany Baptist Church (GIF) St. Lucy's Church (GIF) 500 W. Onondaga St. Inc. (GIF) Onondaga Commons LLC (GIF) Onondaga Commons LLC (GIF) Onondaga Commons LLC (GIF) Onondaga Commons LLC (GIF) Gemmi Boy (GIF) Mr. Lady Bug (GIF) Grace Episcopal Church (GIF) Snapse Downtown (GIF) 360 Warren Associates (GIF) Housing Visions Unlimited (GIF) Near West Side Initiatives, Inc. (GIF) Scannell Properties (GIF) Genesee Armory (GIF) Third National Associates (GIF) Center for Peace & Social Justice (GIF) Graham Millwork (GIF) Onondaga Commons LLC (GIF) Onondaga Commons LLC (GIF) Onondaga Commons LLC (GIF) PEACE (GIF) Syracuse Business Center (GIF) Erie Bruce Corp (GIF) 538 Erie Boulevard West (GIF) Near West Side Initiatives, Inc. (GIF) UAS (GIF) Brewster Medical (GIF) Richmond UAS Properties (GIF) Taksum Assoc. (GIF) Zip Networks (GIF) Ra lin Inc. (GIF) Ra lin Inc. (GIF) Butternut St. LLC (GIF) Nojaim Inc. (GIF) St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center (GIF) Auto Row (GIF)

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

25,300.00 62,700.00 53,050.00 61,050.00 137,350.00 129,400.00 178,050.00 99,311.00 343,333.00 69,000.00 34,347.00 124,200.00 198,300.00 175,787.00 77,800.00 47,537.00 46,700.00 99,000.00 35,700.00 107,864.00 194,650.00 34,500.00 204,000.00 144,400.00 533,300.00 57,700.00 90,500.00 124,100.00 33,400.00 294,300.00 52,200.00 517,000.00 151,700.00 130,850.00 94,300.00 57,600.00 221,000.00 299,200.00 45,200.00 205,775.00 137,000.00 238,400.00 104,430.00 234,800.00 145,900.00 138,000.00


CONTRACTORS FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS CSO's (cont) WCNY (GIF) Auto Row (GIF) University Hill Apts. (GIF) J C Smith Inc. (GIF) St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center (GIF) Housing Visions Unlimited (GIF) R J Westcott (GIF) R J Westcott (GIF) R J Westcott (GIF) Nick's Garage (GIF) Tan A Grocery (GIF) Consuela's-Tato Britter Transp. (GIF) Auto Row (GIF) Jorge Auto Repair (GIF) Pyramids Halal Meat (GIF) Lisa Welch (GIF) Heritage Lincoln (GIF) JNJ (GIF) 900 E Fayette (GIF) 712-715 E Fayette Group (GIF) Gadsen Property (GIF) MPL Armory m(GIF) Near West Side (GIF) North Side Learning (GIF) 751 N Salina LLC (GIF) Lisa Welch (GIF) 800 Block (GIF)

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

98,527.00 164,000.00 36,500.00 84,411.00 33,100.00 70,200.00 125,750.00 130,400.00 18,000.00 382,000.00 52,000.00 38,237.50 147,600.00 109,500.00 49,000.00 32,877.00 654,600.00 83,200.00 65,800.00 47,600.00 58,000.00 48,000.00 681,658.00 189,000.00 53,800.00 40,423.00 170,500.00

ERIE BOULEVARD STORAGE SYSTEM M. Hubbard Construction Ridley Electric (Electrical) Endeco/YSI (SE33923)

$ 1,556,752.00 $ 154,059.00 $ 24,117.90

FRANKLIN STREET FCF Burns Bros (Mechanical) Scriba Electric (Electrical) Burns Bros. (Plumbing) Maxim

$ 179,167.67 $ 144,640.61 $ 28,400.00 $ 3,568,029.43

HARBOR BROOK CSO ABATEMENT Joseph J. Lane Construction (Interceptor Sewer Replacement) Bette Cring (Elephant Barn Greening) John Dudley Construction (Geddes St) J&B Installations (Hazard Library/Erie Canal Museum) Economy Paving (Rosamond Gifford Zoo)

$ 23,391,425.07 $ 207,701.00 $ 279,068.06 $ 67,275.00 $ 688,638.00


CONTRACTORS FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS CSO's (cont) J.J. Lane (Lower HB) A.J. Montclair (HB CSO Storage) C.O. Falter (HB CSO Storage) Davis Wallbridge (Onon Cty Pub Library) Cornerstone Paving (Parking Lots) Green Culture Tumbers, Schichtels Nursery (trees), Proscapes, Dixie City of Syracuse VIP Steadman Old Farm Bette Cring (Zoo Wetlands) Marcellus Const. (CSO 063) OnSite J J Lane (CSO 18) Patricia Electric (Wetland Pilot) MOU City of Syracuse (Road Reconstruction) Davis Wallbridge (Wadsworth Park) Acts II (Lewis Park) J & J Landscape (Annual Green) DE Tarolli (Green Structures) Knapp Electric (Wetlands) Vitale Excavating (Bedding Sand), Butler Fence Barton & Loguidice NYSARC, Inc. (GIF) Vibrant Spaces, LLC (GIF) James Ranalli, W. Genesee (GIF) Vibrant Spaces, LLC (GIF) Brooklyn Pickle (GIF) St. Patrick's Loft (GIF) Smith Housing (GIF) Richard Destito (GIF) Burnet Park Newstand (GIF) Visiting Nurse Assoc. of CNY (GIF) All Times (GIF)

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

5,373,078.94 260,000.00 30,259,100.80 378,920.43 149,195.48 80,665.00 347,542.53 3,342,875.63 51,382.74 11,480.00 1,290,064.10 5,612,007.53 8,755.00 4,370,168.29 197,767.56 138,165.00 345,524.55 217,285.58 25,807.00 12,576.00 41,856.00 232,533.35 4,600.00 78,907.14 153,618.00 616,100.00 198,680.00 30,555.00 177,300.00 52,600.00 232,200.00 60,622.00 60,349.20 92,600.00

$

373,370.21

HARBOR BROOK FCF C.O. Falter Construction Corp. (General)

KIRKPATRICK ST. PUMP STATION & FORCE MAIN C.O. Falter Construction Corp. C.O. Falter Construction Corp. Patricia Electric King & King Mechanical G.J. Adams Plumbing

$ 4,398,009.12 $ 4,425,766.31 $ 761,184.63 $ 245,569.51 $ 51,624.16


CONTRACTORS FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS CSO's (cont) MALTBIE STREET FCF Over & Under Piping

$

152,418.00

MIDLAND AVENUE CONVEYANCES Marcellus Construction (General)

$ 1,836,434.47

MIDLAND AVENUE PHASE II CONVEYANCES & RTF Empire Dismantlement Corp. (Demolition) Murnane Building Contractors, Inc. (General) Ridley Electric Company (Electrical)

$ 457,681.50 $ 47,929,392.75 $ 2,904,771.00

MIDLAND AVENUE PHASE III CONVEYANCES Titan Wrecking & Environmental, LLC (Demolition) Edward Joy Company (HVAC) Edward Joy Company (Plumbing) Tumbers, Schichtels Nursery, Ballantyne, Other(Batcon) J.J. Lane Acts II (Hugh's Magnet School Parking Lot) Davis Wallbridge (Onon Cty Pub Library) J & J Landscape (annual green) VIP (Onon Public Library) Green Culture (Rain Barrels) Weather Guard Tecta (USPO Salina St) MOU City of Syracuse (Road Reconstruction) MA Bongiovanni (storage Tank) MOU City of Syracuse (ESF) Env. Design (Gazones Stormwater) Barton & Loguidice (green design) D E Tarolli (Annual green) Marcellus Construction (green Infrastructure) Jubilee Homes of Syracuse (GIF) Dunbar Association, Inc. (GIF) Syracuse Model Neighborhood (GIF) People's AME Zion Church (GIF) People's Community Dev. Corp (GIF) Salina Shoe Salon (GIF) People's AME Zion Church (GIF) Matawon Development Group (GIF) Tucker Missionary Baptist Church (GIF) Swallows (GIF) Viraj NY (GIF) Viraj Salina (GIF) Believers Chapel (GIF) Southside Comm. Coalition (GIF)

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

290,801.39 2,053,808.50 484,717.17 595,409.00 12,098,662.37 314,439.81 116,033.35 92,997.00 25,691.39 44,335.50 242,860.00 408,332.04 66,130.00 100,000.00 118,172.50 334,800.00 2,606,540.28 2,428,114.52 200,000.00 99,840.00 250,000.00 61,300.00 80,825.00 48,000.00 5,000.00 24,214.00 146,700.00 111,900.00 125,200.00 320,100.00 167,800.00 59,800.00


CONTRACTORS FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS CSO's (cont) SEWER SEPARATION - CSO 022/045 Joy Process Mechanical (Plumbing) Joseph J. Lane Construction

$ 853,536.68 $ 4,757,886.66

SEWER SEPARATION - CSO 024 C.O. Falter Construction Corp.

$

698,863.74

SEWER SEPARATION - CSO 053/054 C.O. Falter Construction Corp.

$ 2,000,817.40

SEWER SEPARATION - CSO 038, 040, 046A&B C.O. Falter Construction Corp.

$ 3,524,487.29

SEWER SEPARATION - CSO 047 & 048 C.O. Falter Construction Corp.

$ 1,654,022.34

SEWER SEPARATION - CSO 050 Joseph J. Lane Construction

$ 4,360,527.06

SEWER SEPARATION - CSO 051 Joseph J. Lane Construction

$ 5,029,323.00

SEWER SEPARATION - OTHER Other - tree, fence Pastime Athletic Club (GIF)

$ $

144,701.90 92,700.00

SIPHON REHABILITATION Insituform Metropolitan

$ 1,021,822.99

C.O. Falter Construction Corp. (General) Scriba Electric (Electrical)

$ $

Maxim Construction (General)

$ 2,311,125.85

877,095.43 26,470.20


x


WEP ACRONYMS ACJ

Amended Consent Judgment

AMP

Ambient Monitoring Program

AMSA

Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies

ARRA

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act

ASLF

Atlantic States Legal Foundation

AWQS

Ambient Water Quality Standards

BAF

Biological Aerated Filter (Biostyr)

BMP

Best Management Practices

BOD

Biological Oxygen Demand

BPJ

Best Professional Judgment

Brew

WEP’s Standard Abbreviation for the Brewerton Wastewater Treatment Plant

Bville

WEP’s Standard Abbreviation for the Baldwinsville Wastewater Treatment Plant

CAA

Clean Air Act

CALM

Consolidated Assessment and Listing Methodology

CAMP

Community Air Monitoring Plan

CIP

Capital Improvement Plan

CMOM

Capacity, Management, Operation, and Maintenance

CSLAP

Citizens Statewide Lake Assessment Program

CSO

Combined Sewer Overflow

CWA

Clean Water Act

DMR

Discharge Monitoring Report

DO

Dissolved Oxygen

EBM

Ecosystem-Based Management

ECL

Environmental Conservation Law

ECM

Energy Conservation Measures

EECBG

Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant

ELAP

Environmental Laboratory Approval Program

EMS

Environmental Management System

ERM

Environmental Resource Mapper

FCF

Floatable Control Facility

FOG

Fats, Oil, and Grease

GIF

Green Improvement Fund

H:\2013\MoRpt\Abbreviations\abbreviations.doc


HRFS

High Rate Flocculation Settling

I&I

Inflow & Infiltration

IW

Industrial Wastewater

km

Kilometers

km2

Square Kilometers

LA

Load Allocations

LF

Linear Feet

m

Meters

MCP

Municipal Compliance Plan

MDV

Multiple Discharge Variance

Metro

WEP’s Standard Abbreviation for the Metropolitan Syracuse Wastewater Treatment Plant

MGD

Million Gallons Per Day

mg/L

Milligrams Per Liter

MIS

Main Interceptor Sewer

ML

WEP’s Standard Abbreviation for the Meadowbrook/Limestone WWTP

MS4s

Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems

mt

Metric Tons

NACWA

National Association of Clean Water Agencies

NBP

National Biosolids Partnership

NELAC

National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference

NPDES

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

NYSDEC

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

NYSDOH

New York State Department of Health

NYSEFC

New York State Environmental Facilities Corp.

NYWEA

New York Water Environmental Association

OAK

WEP’s Standard Abbreviation for the Oak Orchard WWTP

OLP

Onondaga Lake Partnership

OLWQM

Onondaga Lake Water Quality Model

OU

Odor Unit

P2

Prevention Program

P2CO

Prevention Program County Operations

PdM

Predictive Maintenance

H:\2013\MoRpt\Abbreviations\abbreviations.doc


PIDs

Photo-ionization Detectors

PFRP

Process to Further Reduce Pathogens

PLA

Project Labor Agreement

POTW

Publicly Owned Treatment Works

PWL

Priority Waterbodies List

RTF

Regional Treatment Facility

SCA

Sediment Consolidation Area

SCADA

Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition

SEPS

Secondary Effluent Pump Station

SEQR

State Environmental Quality Review

SGIP

Suburban Green Infrastructure Program

SHB

Solids Handling Building

SMPs

Storm Water Management Practices

SOP

Standard Operating Procedure

SORP

Sewer Overflow Response Plan

SPCC

Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures

SPDES

State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

SRP

Soluble Reactive Phosphorus

SSES

Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Study

SSI

Sewage Sludge Incinerator

SSV

Site-Specific Variance

SUNY-ESF

State University of New York College of Science and Forestry

SWMM

Storm Water Management Modeling

SWMP

Storm Water Management Plan

SWPPP

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan

TBEL

Stechnology-Based Effluent Limits

TDP

Total Dissolved Phosphorus

TMDL

Total Maximum Daily Load

TP

Total Phosphorus

TSI

Trophic State Index

UAA

Use Attainability Analysis

UFI

Upstate Freshwater Institute

ug/l

Micrograms per Liter

USEPA

United States Environmental Protection Agency

H:\2013\MoRpt\Abbreviations\abbreviations.doc


USFWS

United States Fish and Wildlife Service

USGBC

United States Green Building Council

USGS

United States Geological Survey

UST

Underground Storage Tank

VOC

Volatile Organic Compounds

WAN

Wide Area Network

WLA

Waste Load Allocations

WEF

Water Environment Federation

WEP

Water Environment Protection

WET

Whole Effluent Toxicity

WLA

Waste Load Allocations

WQBEL

Water Quality-Based Effluent Limits

WR

WEP’s Standard Abbreviation for the Wetzel Road Wastewater Treatment Plant

WSE

Waste Stream Environmental

H:\2013\MoRpt\Abbreviations\abbreviations.doc



Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.