CLEVLOT - Stakeholder Summit 3.0 - Outcomes

Long-term Stewardship & Support Working Group

1a

Problem Statement

There is no consistent system of support that provides education, planning, and resources for green space developers, resulting in high rates of project failure and an increased maintenance responsibility for the City of Cleveland when projects fail.

2a

Brainstorm Prototypes

1 Prototype a position. Someone to help provide support as needed. Need consistency in a dynamic environment. Help desk? Work w/ CDC, community centers, or public libraries to train an existing position. People are overwhelmed with the process of reviewing codes, City Hall, ect. Someone to be the translator. Look at CLE Documenters as example. Many would be looking for funding sources—need help identifying grants.

2 Central Resource for Information. For example, people looking to acquire a vacant lot have different needs. Current system is very specialized, but we need to standardize some components. Need a solution that is accessible & effective. Could start as a webpage for the prototype. (Should be interactive, but will provide baseline for wants and needs.)

3 Curriculum. Particularly if we leverage CDCs or libraries. Foundation w/ foundational dollars to support, because running out of money is a key challenge. Institutionalize learnings from various organizations. (Vacant Lot 101 Curriculum on a website, which has a forum)

Question routing webpage or Vacant Land web forum. Examples like iNaturalist or Reddit page w/ verified respondents.

Votes

0

Goals 1b

● Support the existing effort to create Land Trusts in Cleveland.

● Develop a resource center in partnership with a Land Trust—1 stop shop.

● Clear communication regarding who is the steward of a VL project.

● Clear understanding of Land Bank approvals to take actions.

● Provide multiple outreach channels (in-person, digital, multilingual, etc.)

● Need to coordinate with updated policy (econ. dev. vs. community dev.)

2b

Prototype Proposal

4

0

A web forum to access and archive crowd-sourced information about planning, funding, and operating vacant land reuse projects.

Before Next Meeting: Summarize Prototype Proposal in a few presentation slides.

Long-term Stewardship & Support Working Group

1a

There is no consistent system of support that provides education, planning, and resources for green space developers, resulting in high rates of project failure and an increased maintenance responsibility for the City of Cleveland when projects fail.

Goals 1b 2a

Problem Statement

● Support the existing effort to create Land Trusts in Cleveland.

● Develop a resource center in partnership with a Land Trust—1 stop shop. Clear communication regarding who is the steward of a VL project.

● Clear understanding of Land Bank approvals to take actions. Provide multiple outreach channels (in-person, digital, multilingual, etc.) Need to coordinate with updated policy (econ. dev. vs. community dev.)

Brainstorm Prototypes

1 Prototype a position. Someone to help provide support as needed. Need consistency in a dynamic environment. Help desk? Work w/ CDC, community centers, or public libraries to train an existing position. People are overwhelmed with the process of reviewing codes, City Hall, ect. Someone to be the translator. Look at CLE Documenters as example. Many would be looking for funding sources—need help identifying grants.

For example, people looking to acquire a vacant lot have different needs. Current system is very specialized, but we need to standardize some components. Need a solution that is accessible & effective. Could start as a webpage for the prototype. (Should be interactive, but will provide baseline for wants and needs.)

Particularly if we leverage CDCs or libraries. Foundation w/ foundational dollars to support, because running out of money is a key challenge. Institutionalize learnings from various organizations. (Vacant Lot 101 Curriculum on a website, which has a forum) Examples like iNaturalist or Reddit

Votes

0

Prototype Proposal

4

0

A web forum to access and archive crowd-sourced information about planning, funding, and operating vacant land reuse projects.

Before Next Meeting: Summarize Prototype Proposal in a few presentation slides.

Long-term Stewardship & Support Working Group

1a

Problem Statement

Web Forum Prototype

There is no consistent system of support that provides education, planning, and resources for green space developers, resulting in high rates of project failure and an increased maintenance responsibility for the City of Cleveland when projects fail.

2a

Brainstorm Prototypes

1 Prototype a position. Someone to help provide support as needed. Need consistency in a dynamic environment. Help desk? Work w/ CDC, community centers, or public libraries to train an existing position. People are overwhelmed with the process of reviewing codes, City Hall, ect. Someone to be the translator. Look at CLE Documenters as example. Many would be looking for funding sources—need help identifying grants.

2 Central Resource for Information. For example, people looking to acquire a vacant lot have different needs. Current system is very specialized, but we need to standardize some components. Need a solution that is accessible & effective. Could start as a webpage for the prototype. (Should be interactive, but will provide baseline for wants and needs.)

3 Curriculum. Particularly if we leverage CDCs or libraries. Foundation w/ foundational dollars to support, because running out of money is a key challenge. Institutionalize learnings from various organizations. (Vacant Lot 101 Curriculum on a website, which has a forum) Question routing webpage or Vacant Land web forum. Examples like iNaturalist or Reddit page w/ verified respondents.

Votes

0

Goals 1b

4

0

● Support the existing effort to create Land Trusts in Cleveland.

www.CLEVLOT.org

● Develop a resource center in partnership with a Land Trust—1 stop shop.

● Clear communication regarding who is the steward of a VL project.

CLEVLOT

Home

FAQ Login

● Clear understanding of Land Bank approvals to take actions.

● Provide multiple outreach channels (in-person, digital, multilingual, etc.)

RESOURCE PAGE

● Need to coordinate with updated policy (econ. dev. vs. community dev.)

2b

Recently Asked Questions

Prototype Proposal

Posted: 8/6/2022

I have a property next door that’s not being maintained. Who do I contact?

Posted: 7/10/2022

A web forum to access and archive crowd-sourced information about planning, funding, and operating vacant land reuse projects.

I want to plant a tree in my yard but can’t afford to buy one. Anyone know of any free trees?

Posted: 7/11/2022

Hey Bob, I just got a free tree from @ReforestOurCity. Hope this helps!

Posted: 7/13/2022

Bob, this is ___ from @ReforestOurCity. Sign up for our newsletter and we’ll let you know when we’re giving away more trees.

Posted: 8/6/2022

Before Next Meeting: Summarize Prototype Proposal in a few presentation slides.

Is there any funding out there to help maintain my property?

Long-term Stewardship & Support Working Group

1a

Problem Statement

How could this prototype connect to other working groups?

Planning Criteria, Metrics & Integration:

There is no consistent system of support that provides education, planning, and resources for green space developers, resulting in high rates of project failure and an increased maintenance responsibility for the City of Cleveland when projects fail.

• Provide Track keywords from outreach or create new research areas.

FEEDBACK

What do you like about this prototype?

Goals 1b

● Support the existing effort to create Land Trusts in Cleveland.

What

● Develop a resource center in partnership with a Land Trust—1 stop shop.

suggestions do you have to improve this prototype?

● Clear communication regarding who is the steward of a VL project.

● Clear understanding of Land Bank approvals to take actions.

● Provide multiple outreach channels (in-person, digital, multilingual, etc.)

• Repository of questions & answers to look back at! :)

● Need to coordinate with updated policy (econ. dev. vs. community dev.)

• Make forum topics shareable on social media Twitter, IG, FB, LI.

2a

• When people apply for a community or side lot project refer them to this resource.

Brainstorm Prototypes

• Provides both formal and informal assistance.

Votes

• Categories of forum topics based on working group categories.

1 Prototype a position. Someone to help provide support as needed. Need consistency in a dynamic environment. Help desk? Work w/ CDC, community centers, or public libraries to train an existing position. People are overwhelmed with the process of reviewing codes, City Hall, ect. Someone to be the translator. Look at CLE Documenters as example. Many would be looking for funding sources—need help identifying grants.

2 Central Resource for Information. For example, people looking to acquire a vacant lot have different needs. Current system is very specialized, but we need to standardize some components. Need a solution that is accessible & effective. Could start as a webpage for the prototype. (Should be interactive, but will provide baseline for wants and needs.)

3 Curriculum. Particularly if we leverage CDCs or libraries. Foundation w/ foundational dollars to support, because running out of money is a key challenge. Institutionalize learnings from various organizations. (Vacant Lot 101 Curriculum on a website, which has a forum)

Question routing webpage or Vacant Land web forum. Examples like iNaturalist or Reddit page w/ verified respondents.

0

4

0

2b

• How about asking some groups like OSU Extension to have someone to be a contact for certain topics?

Prototype Proposal

• Adding video learning tutorials process.

A web forum to access and archive crowd-sourced information about planning, funding, and operating vacant land reuse projects.

Before Next Meeting: Summarize Prototype Proposal in a few presentation slides.

Working Group

Planning Criteria, Metrics, and Integration

1a

Problem Statement

2a

Brainstorm Prototypes

Survey or conversations within the community. Answers could guide approach. What are the fine-grain needs of the community?

Bridge scales of city planning and neighborhood/residents.

Definitions of data layers. Need to define EJ data, “beneficial” and “harmful”, as well as multi-scale goals.

Environmental and Racial Justice Tool - (TPL maps could be a start)

Best practices resource. Find best practices from other cities related to this problem statement. (ex. National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership)

Resources page for available funds, support.

Before Next Meeting: Summarize Prototype Proposal in a few presentation slides.

Decision makers lack an environmental justice data tool to locate projects on vacant land with consideration to beneficial and harmful features and in alignment with neighborhood, city, and regional goals.

Planning Criteria, Metrics, and Integration Working Group

1a

Problem Statement

Goals 1b

Decision makers lack an environmental justice data tool to locate projects on vacant land with consideration to beneficial and harmful features and in alignment with neighborhood, city, and regional goals.

● Achieve a macro-level understanding and micro-level (block by block) understanding of Environmental Justice.

● Keep everybody engaged and involved in the process of developing and tracking progress towards our metrics/framework.

● Create a decision-making tool that is testable. Validated by different users.

● Integrate vacant land work with the other plans & programs. Not just city-scale, but regional. (Connect to Climate Action Plan & across silos.)

2a

Brainstorm Prototypes

Survey or conversations within the community. Answers could guide approach. What are the fine-grain needs of the community?

Bridge scales of city planning and neighborhood/residents.

Definitions of data layers. Need to define EJ data, “beneficial” and “harmful”, as well as multi-scale goals.

Environmental and Racial Justice Tool - (TPL maps could be a start)

Votes

2

2b

Prototype Proposal

5

A selection of data to define environmental justice and a method to capture community vision that informs vacant land reuse decisions.

Best practices resource. Find best practices from other cities related to this problem statement. (ex. National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership) 0

Resources page for available funds, support. 0

Before Next Meeting: Summarize Prototype Proposal in a few presentation slides.

Planning Criteria, Metrics, and Integration Working Group

1a

Problem Statement

Goals 1b

Outreach Methods Prototype

• Surveying

Decision makers lack an environmental justice data tool to locate projects on vacant land with consideration to beneficial and harmful features and in alignment with neighborhood, city, and regional goals.

• Phone calls

• Texting

• Community meetings

2a

• Door knocking

Brainstorm Prototypes

• Flyers (+ QR codes)

• Social media

Survey or conversations within the community. Answers could guide approach. What are the fine-grain needs of the community?

• Social meetings

Bridge scales of city planning and neighborhood/residents.

• Attending already existing gatherings

Votes

● Achieve a macro-level understanding and micro-level (block by block) understanding of Environmental Justice.

● Keep everybody engaged and involved in the process of developing and tracking progress towards our metrics/framework.

● Create a decision-making tool that is testable. Validated by different users.

● Integrate vacant land work with the other plans & programs. Not just city-scale, but regional. (Connect to Climate Action Plan & across silos.)

2b

Prototype Proposal

2

• Simple language

Definitions of data layers. Need to define EJ data, “beneficial” and “harmful”, as well as multi-scale goals.

5

A selection of data to define environmental justice and a method to capture community vision that informs vacant land reuse decisions.

• Multilingual

Environmental and Racial Justice Tool - (TPL maps could be a start)

Best practices resource. Find best practices from other cities related to this problem statement. (ex. National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership) 0

Resources page for available funds, support. 0

Before Next Meeting: Summarize Prototype Proposal in a few presentation slides.

Planning Criteria, Metrics, and Integration Working Group

1a

Problem Statement

Goals 1b

Decision makers lack an environmental justice data tool to locate projects on vacant land with consideration to beneficial and harmful features and in alignment with neighborhood, city, and regional goals.

2a

Brainstorm Prototypes

Survey or conversations within the community. Answers could guide approach. What are the fine-grain needs of the community?

Bridge scales of city planning and neighborhood/residents.

Definitions of data layers. Need to define EJ data, “beneficial” and “harmful”, as well as multi-scale goals.

Environmental and Racial Justice Tool - (TPL maps could be a start)

Votes

2

5

Best practices resource. Find best practices from other cities related to this problem statement. (ex. National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership) 0

Resources page for available funds, support. 0

● Achieve a macro-level understanding and micro-level (block by block) understanding of Environmental Justice.

● Keep everybody engaged and involved in the process of developing and tracking progress towards our metrics/framework.

● Create a decision-making tool that is testable. Validated by different users.

● Integrate vacant land work with the other plans & programs. Not just city-scale, but regional. (Connect to Climate Action Plan & across silos.)

Create a hands-on tool that allows users to show what percentage of vacant land they want dedicated to various uses. By moving dials on a pie chart, a community member can change the allocation for Housing, Gardens, Parks, and other vacant land use options to indicate their priorities.

2b

Vacant Land Priorities Prototype Environmental Justice Priorities Prototype

Prototype Proposal

Potentially used in combination with the vacant land priorities tool, this interactive exercise visualizes a range of Environmental Justice data, then empowers individuals to choose the top priorities for their neighborhood. The tool could also allow participants to add data layers they think are missing.

A selection of data to define environmental justice and a method to capture community vision that informs vacant land reuse decisions.

Before Next Meeting: Summarize Prototype Proposal in a few presentation slides.

Planning Criteria, Metrics, and Integration Working Group

1a

Problem Statement

Data Integration Prototype

Votes

Survey or conversations

What are the fine-grain needs of the community?

Bridge scales of city planning and neighborhood/residents.

Definitions of data layers. well as multi-scale goals.

Environmental and Racial Justice Tool - (TPL maps could be a start)

Best practices resource. Find best practices from other cities related to this problem statement. (ex. National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership) 0

2

5

Resources page for available funds, support. 0

Goals 1b

● Achieve a macro-level understanding and micro-level (block by block) understanding of Environmental Justice.

● Keep everybody engaged and involved in the process of developing and tracking progress towards our metrics/framework.

● Create a decision-making tool that is testable. Validated by different users.

● Integrate vacant land work with the other plans & programs. Not just city-scale, but regional. (Connect to Climate Action Plan & across silos.)

2b

Central Database

Prototype Proposal

EPA Index Environmental Justice Recreation Center and Parks Map TPL 10 Minute Walk NST Census (Race and Income)

A selection of data to define environmental justice and a method to capture community vision that informs vacant land reuse decisions.

Before Next Meeting: Summarize Prototype Proposal in a few presentation slides.

Policy & Funding:

Planning Criteria, Metrics, and Integration

FEEDBACK

1a

Problem Statement

• Provide input to Policy group to determine sites suitable for development or not.

Decision makers lack an environmental justice data tool to locate projects on vacant land with consideration to beneficial and harmful features and in alignment with neighborhood, city, and regional goals.

• Define highest & best uses

• How data findings align w/ current neighborhood land use priorities. When do these shift?

Brainstorm Prototypes

What do you like about this prototype?

What

● Achieve a macro-level understanding and micro-level (block by block) understanding of Environmental Justice.

● Keep everybody engaged and involved in the process of developing and tracking progress towards our metrics/framework.

• Recognized depth of resouces and aspects to consider.

• Use QR Codes

Goals 1b 2a

Votes

• Adjusting for % of resident populations. (i.e. Councilmembers). Do vacant concentrations adjust?

Survey or conversations within the community. Answers could guide approach. What are the fine-grain needs of the community? Bridge scales of city planning and neighborhood/residents.

• Do properties need to be leased to allow for future needs?

Definitions of data layers. Need to define EJ data, “beneficial” and “harmful”, as well as multi-scale goals.

Environmental and Racial Justice Tool - (TPL maps could be a start)

Long-term Stewardship & Support:

• Connect w/ forum webpage to engage + empower community

Best practices resource. Find best practices from other cities related to this problem statement. (ex. National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership) 0

● Create a decision-making tool that is testable. Validated by different users.

● Integrate vacant land work with the other plans & programs. Not just city-scale, but regional. (Connect to Climate Action Plan & across silos.)

2b

2

5

Prototype Proposal

Resources page for available funds, support. 0

A selection of data to define environmental justice and a method to capture community vision that informs vacant land reuse decisions.

Before Next Meeting: Summarize Prototype Proposal in a few presentation slides.

How could this prototype connect to other working groups?

suggestions do you have to improve this prototype?

Process Transparency and Community Engagement Working Group

Technology can be a barrier for some community members, so our solution should recognize this user need.

Visualize the process in a clear and accessible manner for those that are responsible for disposing of land.

Create a “fluid system”— answer who, how & provide customer support. Communicate an identified and reliable timeline.

Enable all to use the same tool—a shared resource. (Ex. Land Bank Univ.)

Before Next Meeting: Summarize Prototype Proposal in a few presentation slides.

1a

●

Engagement

●

● Create a “fluid system”— answer who, how & provide customer support.

● Communicate an identified and reliable timeline.

●

Votes

A Flowchart (Responsibility, Timeline, Identifiable process, decision steps)

- Create a tangible item (non-digital)

- Online tool (easily accessible) 211 (How can it help?)

Flowchart (Where are points in the process where community members are involved)

Build partnership with existing resource distribution network.

Cleveland Public Library system - Land Bank University, both in-person & online.

● Land Bank University - more Educational (From Place to owning parcel)

Neighborhood Transformation Alliance Resource Center @ each Recreation Center.

Court system has become a strong resource point for outreach.

Map existing actions done by CDCs. (What is the follow through with residents?)

Create a new Community Outreach Platform? Responsive. Gamification?

Existing Resources Platform - (ex. Help understand what current food system programs are available?) 1

Prototype Proposal

1a ● Technology can be a barrier for some community members, so our solution should recognize this user need.

● Visualize the process in a clear and accessible manner for those that are responsible for disposing of land.

● Create a “fluid system”— answer who, how & provide customer support.

● Communicate an identified and reliable timeline.

● Enable all to use the same tool—a shared resource. (Ex. Land Bank Univ.)

Votes

A Flowchart

- Create a tangible item (non-digital)

- Online tool (easily accessible) 211 (How can it help?)

Flowchart (Where are points in the process where community members are involved)

Build partnership with existing resource distribution network.

Cleveland Public Library system - Land Bank University, both in-person & online.

Neighborhood Transformation Alliance Resource Center @ each Recreation Center. Court system has become a strong resource point for outreach. Map existing actions done by CDCs. (What is the follow through with residents?) Create a new Community Outreach Platform? Responsive. Gamification?

Existing Resources Platform - (ex. Help understand what current food system programs are available?) 1

Vacant Land Matchmaker (Mapping Project to a Place) (Person - Place - Organization) 2

Before Next Meeting: Summarize Prototype Proposal in a few presentation slides.

Prototype Proposal

LOT STEWARDSHIPOWNERSHIP

Process Transparency and Community Engagement Working Group

1a

Problem Statement

How could this prototype connect to other working groups?

Policy & Funding

For residents and organizations wanting to reuse/revitalize vacant land, there is a lack of clarity around the process of acquiring land from the City of Cleveland Land Bank resulting in delays, lost investments, and diminishing trust.

Long-term Stewardship & Support Planning Criteria, Metrics & Integration:

FEEDBACK

What do you like about

• Mentoring

• The flow, the process

Goals 1b

● Technology can be a barrier for some community members, so our solution should recognize this user need.

this prototype?

What suggestions do you have to improve this prototype?

● Visualize the process in a clear and accessible manner for those that are responsible for disposing of land.

● Create a “fluid system”— answer who, how & provide customer support.

• Use clear images & icons. For lay person.

● Communicate an identified and reliable timeline.

• Sidelots vs. community projects

● Enable all to use the same tool—a shared resource. (Ex. Land Bank Univ.)

• Direct residents/developers to resources & training classes.

2a

Brainstorm Prototypes

A Flowchart (Responsibility, Timeline, Identifiable process, decision steps)

- Create a tangible item (non-digital)

• Connect w/ Long-term Stewardship & Support and Planning Criteria, Metrics & Integration in regards to how to let community know of presence.

- Online tool (easily accessible) 211 (How can it help?)

Flowchart (Where are points in the process where community members are involved)

Build partnership with existing resource distribution network.

Cleveland Public Library system - Land Bank University, both in-person & online.

● Land Bank University - more Educational (From Place to owning parcel)

Neighborhood Transformation Alliance Resource Center @ each Recreation Center. Court system has become a strong resource point for outreach.

Map existing actions done by CDCs. (What is the follow through with residents?)

Create a new Community Outreach Platform? Responsive. Gamification?

Votes

3

2b

Prototype Proposal

2

A print and digital graphic representation of the vacant land reuse process for residents and organizations that identifies areas for community involvement.

Existing Resources Platform - (ex. Help understand what current food system programs are available?) 1

Vacant Land Matchmaker (Mapping Project to a Place) (Person - Place - Organization) 2

Before Next Meeting: Summarize Prototype Proposal in a few presentation slides.

Policy and Funding Working Group

Problem Statement 1a Goals 1b

Votes

Before Next Meeting: Summarize Prototype Proposal in a few presentation slides.

Policy and Funding Working Group

1a

Problem Statement

Goals 1b

The current Cleveland Land Bank disposition process is time-intensive, reactive, and lacks strategy, causing the rate of incoming parcels to outpace the rate of parcel disposition and a steady increase in parcel inventory.

● Lots identified for large-scale development should include a deadline (expiration date) and a transition plan for alternative or interim uses.

● Land bank process results in more lots at their highest and best use.

● Include a list of criteria for what a developer is & what the highest and best uses are for vacant land. Includes framework, definitions, and priority list.

● Solutions should be transferable to other cities. (Ex. Vacant Land University. Provides education and leadership.)

2a

Brainstorm Prototypes

Process Map. Who’s the user? Appeal to average user. (Web, videos) Orgs could support this larger process. (Gretchen) City working on mapping the current process, but it’s so broken now, that not valuable to map the current process. Lots of people we need to talk to and we’re understaffed. Flowchart that describes the process, however, that might be ineffective because the process is so complex. Too many channels?

What changes do we need to make to the process?

Audience? Targeted message first. Can we go back and see people who applied for lots in the past five years? Where they successful or not? Engage VL Applicants to learn from their experience , but also help them through the process as a way to test our prototype. City and all learn from process. Time consuming!

Proposed set of policies. Share with City Council. Legislative vs.

Permitting process vs. Land Bank Process. Integrate these two processes? Reduce the questions that need to be answered. Leave the permitting and design to the standard permitting process. (Informal vs. Formal)

Votes

2b

Prototype Proposal

A set of definitions and policies that empowers the Cleveland Land Bank to facilitate faster and more strategic disposition of vacant parcels.

Before Next Meeting: Summarize Prototype Proposal in a few presentation slides.

Policy and Funding

Land Bank System Prototype

Statement 1a

Goals 1b

Before Next Meeting: Summarize Prototype Proposal in a few presentation slides.

Policy and Funding Working Group

1a

Problem Statement

How could this prototype connect to other working groups?

Planning Criteria, Metrics & Integration:

• Data from data group to determine where to hold land for development.

FEEDBACK

Goals 1b

● Lots identified for large-scale development should include a deadline (expiration date) and a transition plan for alternative or interim uses.

● Land bank process results in more lots at their highest and best use.

• Everything!

The current Cleveland Land Bank disposition process is time-intensive, reactive, and lacks strategy, causing the rate of incoming parcels to outpace the rate of parcel disposition and a steady increase in parcel inventory.

• Web based info.

● Include a list of criteria for what a developer is & what the highest and best uses are for vacant land. Includes framework, definitions, and priority list.

• Experience & Expertise Checklist in the preapplication -then- decision tree: (YES) Apply. / (NO) Build in resources for resident to learn how to develop land.

● Solutions should be transferable to other cities. (Ex. Vacant Land University. Provides education and leadership.)

• How to connect with community?

2a

Brainstorm Prototypes

Process Map. Who’s the user? Appeal to average user. (Web, videos) Orgs could support this larger process. (Gretchen) City working on mapping the current process, but it’s so broken now, that not valuable to map the current process. Lots of people we need to talk to and we’re understaffed. Flowchart that describes the process, however, that might be ineffective because the process is so complex. Too many channels?

What changes do we need to make to the process?

Audience? Targeted message first. Can we go back and see people who applied for lots in the past five years? Where they successful or not? Engage VL Applicants to learn from their experience , but also help them through the process as a way to test our prototype. City and all learn from process. Time consuming!

Proposed set of policies. Share with City Council. Legislative vs.

Permitting process vs. Land Bank Process. Integrate these two processes? Reduce the questions that need to be answered. Leave the permitting and design to the standard permitting process. (Informal vs. Formal)

Votes

2b

• Help to identify application skill / knowledge gaps -> point in right diection for resources.

Prototype Proposal

• Community recycling drop off

A set of definitions and policies that empowers the Cleveland Land Bank to facilitate faster and more strategic disposition of vacant parcels.

• Overlap with other dept. priorities (i.e. Sustainability)

Before Next Meeting: Summarize Prototype Proposal in a few presentation slides.

What do you like about this prototype?

What suggestions do you have to improve this prototype?