Contact: Perry Smith Business Editor Phone: 661-287-5599
S A N TA C L A R I TA VA L L E Y
BUSINESS JOURNAL BJ INSIDE SPOTLIGHTS B4 A message from the SCV
Chamber B5 SCV Chamber advocacy B7 SCVEDC Economic Outlook
Conference B9 The List: Family-owned
businesses
NEWS & FEATURES B1 A look at compliance B2 Management company
thrives B2 Signal launches local
stimulus plan B3 Support for small
businesses; A look at SCV market B9 Experts discuss job market
SCV BUSINESS VOICES B1 Poole, Shaffery & Koegle B3 M & M Fasteners Supply B3 Mission Valley Bank B6 SCVEDC B10 Audiology Associates B10 Henry Mayo
FROM THE EXPERTS B6 From the Assessor: Tax
savings tips and an FAQ B7 Ken Keller: Four steps to
move forward B9 Paul Butler: Pushing the
envelope
Email: psmith@signalscv.com Mail: 26330 Diamond Place Suite 100 Santa Clarita, CA 91350 SATURDAY, AUGUST 29, 2020 · WWW.SIGNALSCV.COM · B1
L.A. COUNTY’S COMPLIANCE PLANS FOR HEALTH ORDERS BY TAMMY MURGA Signal Staff Writer
L
os Angeles County health inspectors have received thousands of complaints about businesses not complying with the latest health orders and have conducted multiple visits to ensure infection control measures are put in place. With an estimated 3,000 complaints received per week, the county Department of Public Health has created a tiered compliance and enforcement plan for those caught violating safety measures. “We’re not seeing the compliance that we need, with the Public Health directives in place, to keep people’s health and livelihoods safe,” county Health Officer Dr. Muntu Davis said in a previous virtual media briefing. Complaints about businesses not complying in the Santa Clarita Valley had increased from 93 in May to more than 200 by July, according to Public Health data. “A review of our inspection data revealed most complaints were at restaurants and were generated by the inspectors when they observed the re-opening protocol wasn’t completed,” officials with Public Health’s media department said in an email, adding that 14 businesses with serious violations warranted a re-inspection. Most violations revolved around employees failing to wear face coverings. The goal is to educate businesses in helping them understand what the requirements are “and then assess the severity of the violations,” according to Davis. The county’s plan is broken down into three visits by health inspectors and could include citations and fines for those at repeatedly fail to comply: For permitted and licensed facilities: During the first visit for those permitted and licensed, such as grocery stores, public pools and body art businesses, they are informed about protocols and
Cooled by fans, business owner Maria Barcenas prepares hair color for a customer in the rear parking lot at Maria Argelia’s Beauty Salon in Newhall. In a matter of weeks, businesses have been forced to reinvent their operations in light of COVID-19-related restrictions. PHOTO BY DAN WATSON / THE SIGNAL measures that must be practiced. Inspectors can also issue a $100 fine or a notice of intent to suspect permits. To ensure issues discussed during the visit have been addressed, inspectors can return within three to seven days. If compliance is not met by the second
visit, the department will issue a $500 fine and suspend the facility permit for seven days. A follow-up visit is also scheduled to ensure the locale is in complete compliance with the health officer order and See HEALTH, page B2
SCV BUSINESS VOICES
CORPORATE MEETINGS AND SOCIAL DISTANCING BY CHRIS S. JACOBSEN Esquire, Poole Shaffery & Koegle
A
n important question in the time of COVID-19 health restrictions remains: How does a California corporation hold its meetings while maintaining social distancing and complying with Public Health orders? Fortunately, the Corporations Code provides a number of alternatives to physical meetings. Meetings of the Board of Directors may be had using conference telephone, electronic video screen communication or other electronic transmission. Participation in a meeting by conference telephone or electronic video screen communication constitutes “presence in person” at the meeting so long as the participants are able to hear one another. Participation by other electronic transmission constitutes presence so long as each participant can communicate with all other participants concurrently and each participant is provided the means of participating in all matters before the board, including the capacity to propose or object to a specific action to be taken by the corporation (Corporations Code Section 307(a)(6)). In addition, a board may take an action without meeting if all directors, individually or collectively, consent in writing to the action (Corporations Code Section 307(b)). Meetings of the shareholders may also be conducted, in whole or in part, by electronic transmission or by electronic video screen communication, and such virtual shareholders are deemed “present in person” at the meeting, provided (i) the corporation implements reasonable measures to provide shareholders with an opportunity to participate in the meeting and to vote on matters submitted to the shareholders and (ii) if any shareholder votes or takes other action at the meeting by electronic means, the corporation maintains a record of such vote or action (Corporations Code section 600(a) and (e)). For the complete code, visit: bit.ly/CAcorporations. However, Corporations Code section 603 requires an advance consent of the shareholders for the holding of such a virtual meeting and the technical logistics needed to manage a meeting involving a large shareholder group may be daunting. Corporations desiring to have the option to hold a virtual shareholders meeting would be well served by undertaking the shareholder consent process well in advance of their proposed meeting date. Always check with an experienced attorney to make sure your business is in compliance with the nuances of the California Corporations Code requirements. Chris S. Jacobsen is a partner in the corporate transactions and business law department at Poole Shaffery & Koegle LLP. His extensive experience encompasses all legal aspects of the business life cycle. For more information, visit PooleShaffery,com, or call (855) 997-7522.
EMPLOYMENT LAWS HAVE CHANGED FOR 2020 It is extremely difficult for businesses to comply with California’s ever-changing employment laws. Call today for a review of your employment policies and procedures.
Minimize Your Risk of Exposure Today! Poole Shaffery & Koegle, LLP’s employment law services include: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
Employment Agreements Employment Practices Severance Agreements OSHA Compliance/Violations Employment Handbooks Unfair Competition/Trade Secrets Wage/Hour Law Compliance
■ Insurance ■ Confidentiality Agreements ■ Family Medical Leave Act, California Family Rights Act, and related leaves
■ Regulatory Compliance ■ Workforce Reductions ■ Terminations
Call 661-290-2991 today to schedule your consultation!
Santa Clarita 25350 Magic Mountain Parkway, Second Floor | Santa Clarita, CA 91355 661-290-2991 · POOLESHAFFERY.COM
SANTA CLARITA | LOS ANGELES | VENTURA COUNTY SAN FRANCISCO | ORANGE COUNTY | SAN DIEGO