A10
Editorial
T h e B o s t o n G l o b e
M O N D A Y, N O V E M B E R 2 7 , 2 0 1 7
Opinion BOSTONGLOBE.COM/OPINION
Editorial
Online learning can ease economic inequality
D
igital learning is often seen a complement to sitintheclassroom colleges courses, but at a recent conference at MIT, experts convinc ingly portrayed innovative online offerings as a key tool for helping those of modest means move up the economic ladder. College degrees pay off. But lowincome students often face family, financial, or work constraints that keep them from pursuing higher education fulltime or even on a regular nightsandweekend basis. Citing the fact that 36 million Americans have some college but no degree, key note speaker Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education and a former federal undersecre tary of education, said the American higher education sys tem is “leaving too many students along the side of the road.” And though Massachusetts is a comparatively welled ucated state, the same problem exists here. Chris Gabrieli, chairman of the Massachusetts Board of Higher Educa tion, noted that those who have a bachelor’s degree make, on average, about twice as much as those who don’t. Still, 1.5 million workingage Massachusetts residents either
have only a high school diploma or, if they have taken some college courses, have not obtained any kind of de gree. That despite the fact that almost a third of working age residents without a degree say they’d like to pursue one. The Baker administration hopes that flexible, expand ed digital learning opportunities will help them achieve that goal. One subject that came up repeatedly at was the importance of college courses built around mastering competencies, something that students can work on at their own pace and on their own schedule, rather than on spending a specific amount of time in the classroom. A second: College credit for prior learning. By identify ing and giving credit for legitimate skills already obtained, colleges can ease the path toward a degree. That’s particu larly important for those who have served in the military, since their careers often included highquality training. Meanwhile, several leading employers showcased their own efforts to make digital learning work for current and prospective employees. Partners HealthCare, the state’s largest employer, announced it will make a new online health caremanagement program, offered through the
University of Southern New Hampshire, available to all its employees on an affordable basis. General Electric pledged to interview for jobs any state resident who com pletes a “MicroMasters” program in cybersecurity, artifi cial intelligence, supplychain management, or cloud computing offered through the onlinelearning platform edX.org. So how to push these trends along? One problem is that federal financial aid is generally not available for competencybased online learning. Meanwhile, more em ployers should take their cues from Partners and GE in encouraging digital education. And more colleges should get in the game with affordable, forcredit online offer ings. The Baker administration, which sponsored the con ference and will soon appoint a commission to explore ways to expand online learning opportunities in areas critical to the state’s economy, should be applauded for its efforts here. This kind of wonky work often get over looked, but it’s an important effort to create a future where more residents can share the benefits of our knowl edgebased economy.
Tyranny of the lobbyists By David Dodson
“T
axation without rep resentation is tyranny!” was the ral lying cry 244 years ago when a crowd of Boston patriots dumped 342 chests of tea into Boston Harbor. But if those same freedomloving colonists lived among us now, they’d have a strong lesson for us: America is suffering the same tyranny to day. Earlier this month House Speaker Paul Ryan released the tax bill, written in secret by the Republican Party, with 429 pag es of proposed changes to the tax code. He then pressed the members of Congress to vote on it in 13 days. They did what they were told. Without floor debate, or thoughtful review, nearly every Republican repre sentative came out in support of 429 pages they almost certainly never read. The Internal Revenue Code is now 74,608 pages long, and buried in those tens of thou sands of pages is a tax scheme that virtually no American un derstands. Therein lies the de ceit: We rely on a system of rep resentative democracy. We en trust others to represent our interests. It is not our job to read those 74,608 pages, which is why when they tell us it’s a middleclass tax cut, we believe they are telling the truth. We entrust them while the rest of America takes on equally important jobs, like teaching our children, fighting overseas, digging coal, or making cars. Every day the middle class does its part, while our representa tives in Washington, who have taken an oath, continue to fail to do theirs. Both parties play the same tyrannical game. During the
last 35 years, while control of the Senate and the House has been nearly equally shared by Republicans and Democrats, the number of pages in the tax code has tripled. Representa tives from both parties continue to write paragraphs they know will never be seen by those they were elected to represent. In recent weeks, the leaders of the House and Senate have been delivering soundbites from behind a podium decorat ed with a blue logo and the words “Tax Reform”— profess ing they have simplified the tax code for the middle class. What most Americans are shown is the top tax bracket of 39.6 percent. What we fail to see, though, are the thousands of pages that allow wealthy peo ple to avoid ever paying that rate. To illustrate this, Warren Buffet generously released his 2015 tax return to the public, showing he paid taxes at a 15.5 percent rate — the rate some one making $50,000 per year would pay. The same is true for corpora tions. We are told that corpora tions pay a 35 percent tax rate, when in fact many pay nothing at all, and on average they pay only 17 percent. I’m not coming from a place of sour grapes here. I am lucky enough to be a one percenter, and I’m telling you: The tax bill was not written for the middle class. It was written for people like me. President Trump, who re fused to release his own re turns, acknowledged that he paid very little in taxes. “That makes me smart!” he bragged, to which those of us in the top 1 percent rolled our eyes. Why? Because any businessperson knows wealthy people don’t have to be smart to pay lower
taxes. The game is rigged in our favor. You don’t have to be smart to win when you get to write the rules. Samuel Johnson said the taxation system of King George was “a mere cobweb, spread to catch the unwary, and entangle the weak.” That’s the same out rageous game our representa tives are playing against us to day. We’ve been fooled into thinking the tax code is just too complicated for the average American to understand. But that’s hardly a line of thinking Sam Adams or Paul Revere would have accepted. There is the saying: “Those with the gold get to make the rules.” But that is how great eco nomic systems fail, not how they thrive. Real tax reform, the kind we should insist on, will be about creating a system that doesn’t favor those with power or access. It’ll be simple and un derstood by all Americans — much like the tax code of our grandparents, who lived during a time when America won two world wars and ushered in an
other industrial revolution. If we really want to make America great, we’re going to need to chuck those 74,608 pag es into the harbor and insist on a truly reformed tax system that represents the interests of an in terstate truck driver as faithfully as a millionaire. Letting lobby ists for the moneyed classes build ever more complex tax rules that even our representa tives don’t understand is 21st century tyranny. David Dodson is a general partner of Futaleufu Partners and a lecturer in management at the Stanford Graduate School of Business.
AP
400 1913
504 1939
abcde Fo u n d e d 1 87 2 JOHN W. HENRY Publisher
BRIAN McGRORY Editor
VINAY MEHRA President
ELLEN CLEGG Editor, Editorial Page
LINDA PIZZUTI HENRY Managing Director
CHRISTINE S. CHINLUND Managing Editor
16,500 1969
SENIOR DEPUTY MANAGING EDITORS Mark S. Morrow Jennifer Peter
DEPUTY MANAGING EDITORS Janice Page Arts and Newsroom Innovation Marjorie Pritchard Editorial Page David Dahl Print and Operations Jason M. Tuohey Digital Platforms and Audience Engagement Dante Ramos Ideas Larry Edelman News and Features
26,300 1984
60,044 2004
BUSINESS MANAGEMENT Peter M. Doucette Chief Consumer Revenue Officer Jane Bowman Vice President, Marketing & Strategic Partnerships Doug Most Director, Strategic Growth Initiatives Dan Krockmalnic General Counsel Dale Carpenter Senior Vice President Print Operations Paul Higgins Vice President, Finance
74,608 2017
Charles H. Taylor Founder & Publisher 18731921 William O. Taylor Publisher 19211955 Wm. Davis Taylor Publisher 19551977 William O. Taylor Publisher 19781997 Benjamin B. Taylor Publisher 19971999 Richard H. Gilman Publisher 19992006 P. Steven Ainsley Publisher 20062009 Christopher M. Mayer Publisher 20092014 Laurence L. Winship Editor 19551965 Thomas Winship Editor 19651984