22 minute read
SPOTLIGHT
Facets to Frames
Form Inspires Structure in Beijing
By Mark Sarkisian, S.E., Neville Mathias, S.E., Rupa Garai, S.E., and Andrew Krebs, S.E.
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP was an Award Winner for its Poly International Plaza project in the 2016 NCSEA Annual Excellence in Structural Engineering Awards Program in the Category – New Buildings over $100M.
The elliptically shaped faceted exterior of the 530-foot (161.2-meters) tall Poly International Plaza iconic tower in Beijing was inspired by Chinese paper lanterns to shimmer as it reflects the sky. It is the first structure of its kind, incorporating a four-story super diagrid frame module without perimeter columns and designed to remain essentially elastic in a region of high seismicity. As a non-prescriptive structural system, careful attention was paid to the behavior of the structure, and enhanced analysis and design objectives were set and met.
Structural Efficiency The diagrid module, four stories tall and 60 feet (18 meters) across between nodes, was fabricated using concrete filled steel tubes that work with a central reinforced concrete core to resist gravity and lateral loads. With nodes occurring every two floors, intermediate levels were suspended from nodal levels above to avoid loading diagrid members in bending between nodes, thus increasing the efficiency of the structure. This integrated system architecturally allows for a natural double exterior curtain wall system to accommodate the extreme climate of Beijing. Helical Load Paths By virtue of the diagrid system, lateral loads are transmitted to the base along helical load paths, not relying on a continuous diaphragm slab at the building ends. The exoskeletal diagrid system on the perimeter acts in tandem with the concrete walls at the building core to provide a dual gravity and lateral load resisting system with multiple continuous and redundant load paths. Also, global buckling stability afforded by the three-dimensional form of the diagrid makes it possible to introduce large, architecturally exciting atria into the ends of the plan. Buckling Analysis Extensive buckling analyses were performed to confirm that the diagrid members would yield before local or global buckling occurs. To ensure the stability of the diagrid at the atria, even if the surrounding slabs crack in a major seismic event, in-plane steel floor bracing was introduced to act as a substitute for the diaphragm slabs and stabilize the diagrid. Hoop Stresses Significant tensile hoop and radial forces in the diaphragms and floor framing were noted at mid- level floors, resulting from the tendency for the diagrid frame to bulge under gravity loads. These forces are resisted by the perimeter steel framing members at nodal levels and radial steel floor framing members that connect the diagrid nodes to the inner concrete core, as well as by additional diaphragm slab reinforcement. Non-linear Analysis Extensive non-linear pushover and response history analyses were undertaken, using Perform-3D, in the two principal directions which included material and geometric non-linearity (P-Delta effects) and strength degradation effects. The analyses indicated that shear wall link beams yield first, followed by yielding of some diagrid members at the base. Shear walls take relatively low shears, with no yielding in the rebar at the boundary zones of the walls. The non-linear analyses confirmed that the global structure is life-safe in a rare earthquake event. Redundancy and Progressive Collapse The hangers supporting the intermediate floors were extended down to the nodal floors below without contact and with vertical slip joints at the bases, ensuring that they do not load on the floors below. In the event of a localized hanger failure, the hanger extension member would drop and come into contact with the floor structure below, transferring the loads. Selected diagrid members with high axial forces under gravity load were removed and progressive collapse analysis performed to ensure that a global progressive failure of the perimeter diagrid frame would not occur. Diagrid Node The integrity of the diagrid structural system relies on the performance of the welded nodes. The diagrid nodes were modularized and consist of two horizontal steel plates in line with the perimeter beam flanges, one vertical steel plate centered on the node work-point, and vertical curved plates between the horizontal flange plates aligned with the diagrid sections above and below. Finite element analyses were performed for representative diagrid nodes. Reduced scale tests (cyclic and monotonic tests) were conducted at the China Academy of Building Research (CABR) in Beijing. The tests confirmed the importance of providing concrete within the nodes to ensure that eventual failure occurs beyond the nodes, and to reaffirm the adequacy of the node design. Conclusion This landmark tower leverages a pure diagrid structural system to introduce full height atria and other shared interior spaces, and create unique, light-filled areas. The project, now complete, stands as a visible icon in the new district’s skyline.▪
Mark Sarkisian, S.E., Partner; Neville Mathias, S.E., Associate Director; Rupa Garai, S.E., Associate Director; Andrew Krebs, S.E., Associate, Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP in San Francisco, CA.
ASSOC I A T I O N S NATIONAL COUNCI L
NCSEA News
Licensure SE Progress? The License-sure Is!
NCSEA Structural Licensure Committee Chairs: Kristin Killgore, ZFI Engineering and Alan Kirkpatrick, Kirkpatrick Forest Curtis PC A strong undercurrent of activity kept the Structural Licensure Committee busy during the past year. e committee remains committed to tracking the latest licensure activities, setting meaningful goals, and empowering states to adopt consistent licensure laws. Right now, there are currently 23 states with some form of structural licensure distinction and 13 that have an active SE licensure e ort. e committee has set forth goals to understand the unique set of conditions and stakeholders in each state, and to help others recognize the collective importance of holding structural engineers to a higher standard of practice. During the past year, the committee made plenty of changes, only some of which are mentioned here, but all of which kept our attention focused on advancing structural licensure. Many changes came after long-standing committee member and chair, Joseph Luke, stepped down to devote more time to the Structural Engineering Certi cation Board (SECB) and Kristin Killgore and Alan Kirkpatrick agreed to co-chair the committee. e transition of chairs has been smooth thanks to Joe and his predecessor, Susie Jorgensen. Joe provided tremendous leadership and invaluable insight to the committee during his tenure as chair, and we are grateful for his contributions. He remains active with the committee as his home state of Texas continues along the path to meaningful structural licensure. In September of 2016, the committee met during the NCSEA Summit at Walt Disney World where each represented state gave a comprehensive report on their progress. e annual meeting provided an excellent forum for the exchange of ideas which fostered many meaningful discussions about current licensure activities. Among the issues discussed was NCEES Motion 12, which was defeated in August of 2016. Approval of the measure would have amended the Model Law and Model Rules by adding language for structural engineers that parallels language for professional engineers and professional surveyors. Reasons behind the motion’s defeat have served to make us more e ective and wiser in our support of SE licensure. e forum at the Summit also brought to the committee’s attention multiple issues that relate to basic licensure concepts: • Who are the primary stakeholder organizations interested in SE licensure? • Why are they interested? • What common language can be used to cultivate consistent messaging? • What does it mean exactly to be a “Roster State”? • What are the most commonly asked questions about licensure? • How can we simply describe legislative acts that promote licensure? ese are issues the committee continues to discuss with consideration from all sides. Momentum from the Summit helped shape our priorities for 2017. Our rst goal for the year is to clearly de ne licensure issues to Member Organizations by identifying frequently used terms in the licensure lexicon. is will serve to create a consistent message and an understanding of objectives with all players, including outside organizations. Next, we are developing an easily accessible document of facts, questions, and answers. Finally, we are improving our part of the NCSEA website so that it can e ectively communicate essential information to anyone seeking it, but more speci cally to Member Organizations who want to begin pursuing structural licensure. e NCSEA Summit was a great success and very insightful for everyone who attended. e next may seem far away, but we know that deadlines creep deceptively quickly. e committee continues to work on articles that provide insightful points for anyone who wants to become a persuasive voice in their community. We are looking to visit Member Organizations that are not pursuing SE Licensure to discuss e orts moving forward and we hope to pick up some new members along the way. Our goal is to draw feedback from these visits so that we can better address our goals for 2017 and, after October’s Summit, re ne our goals for 2018. When we meet in Washington this fall, our committee will be prepared to inspire all those ready to take on structural licensure.
SE Review & Refresher Course
Next Live Course: Lateral—March 18-19, 2017
Registration includes: • Recordings available 24/7 after the course • Seminars led by notable experts • Updates to important codes and references • Recommended publication guide Did you miss the Vertical SE Refresher course? The recordings are now available for purchase from NCSEA. 24/7 access to the seminars provides you with all the study time you need!
Professional Training CalOES SAP
e California O ce of Emergency Services (CalOES) Safety Assessment Program (SAP), hosted by NCSEA, is one of only two post-disaster assessment
programs that will be compliant with the requirements of the forthcoming Federal Resource Typing Standards for engineer emergency responders.
Based on ATC-20/45 methodologies and forms, the SAP training course provides engineers, architects, and code-enforcement professionals with the basic skills required to perform safety assessments of structures following disasters. Licensed design professionals and certi ed building o cials will be eligible for SAP Evaluator certi cation and credentials following completion of this program and submission of required documentation. Register for the March 24th course at www.ncsea.com.
NCSEA Special Awards
Each year, NCSEA awards the Excellence in Structural Engineering Awards. is program annually highlights some of the best examples of structural engineering ingenuity throughout the world. Structural engineers and structural engineering rms are encouraged to enter the awards program. Projects are judged on innovative design, engineering achievement, and creativity. e awards are presented in seven categories: • New Buildings Under $20Million • New Buildings $20Million to $100Million • New Buildings over $100Million • New Bridges/Transportation Structures • Forensic/Renovation/Retro t/Rehabilitation Structures up to $20 Million • Forensic/Renovation/Retro t/Rehabilitation Structures over $20 Million • Other Structures Entries are due July 18, 2017. Visit www.ncsea.com for more information.
e Special Awards are presented each year at the Summit to NCSEA members who have provided outstanding service and commitment to the association as well as the structural engineering eld. Nominations for this year’s awards will be accepted until July 18, 2017. However, some awards may not be awarded each year. e awards can be presented in four categories: • James Delahay Award • NCSEA Service Award • Robert Cornforth Award • Susan M. Frey Educator Award Find out more on www.ncsea.com.
Last Notice for Presentations Call for Abstracts
Submissions due March 10, 2017
e 2017 NCSEA Structural Engineering Summit Committee is seeking presentations of up to 75 minutes that deliver pertinent and useful information that Summit attendees can apply in their structural engineering practices. Submissions on best-design practices, new codes and standards, recent projects, advanced analysis techniques, management, business practices, and other topics that would be of interest to practicing structural engineers, are desired. More information on www.ncsea.com.
National Council of Structural Engineers Associations
webinar subscriptionS As low as $750 wherever you go whenever you need them
NCSEA Webinars
March 16, 2017 Draining Low-Sloped Roof Structures - Rain Issues for the Structural Engineer John Lawson, S.E. April 4, 2017 Special Inspections for Masonry John Chrysler, P.E.
April 18, 2017 Upcoming Changes to AISC 341 - Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings James O. Malley, S.E. May 2, 2017 Structural Steel & Bolting: Special Inspections with the IBC & AISC Robert E. Shaw, Jr., P.E. More detailed information on the webinars and a registration link can be found at www.ncsea.com.
NCSEA News
T R U C TURAL S
ASSOC I A T I O N S NATIONAL COUNCI L
The Newsletter of the Structural Engineering Institute of ASCE Structural Columns
Thursday, April 6, 2017
TRACK
BLAST AND DISPROPORTIONATE COLLAPSE WOOD AND TIMBER/ BUILDING CASE STUDIES SEISMIC/TALL BUILDINGS
REINFORCED CONCRETE/ASCE
CODES BRIDGE PRACTICE BRIDGE RESEARCH
9:30 AM – 10:30 AM
Recent Developments in Blast Design and Analysis Case-Studies: Recent Mass Timber Building Projects in North American Seismic Analysis Repair and Rehabilitation Pedestrian Bridges and Tunnels Innovative Materials for Concrete Bridges
11:00 AM – 12:30 PM
Analysis and Testing for Blast Loading Fire Performance of Wood Structural Systems Behavior of Full-Scale RC Special Moment Frame Components Subjected to Collapse-Level Earthquake Loadings ACI 562-16: A Code for Repair of Existing Concrete Structures Erection and Construction of Steel Bridges Retrofit and Rehabilitation of Bridges for Multiple Hazards
1:30 PM – 3:00 PM
3:30 PM – 5:00 PM
Multi-Hazard Response of Structures Subjected to Extreme Loads Case Studies 1 – Building Retrofit Challenges Tall Buildings Meet the New ASCE 37-14: Design Loads on Structures During Construction Standard Rehabilitation and Replacement Connection Challenges Including Seismic Loading in Accelerated Bridge Construction
Structures Subjected to Impact Loads Building Case Studies 2 – Structural Design Challenges Performance-Based Design of Tall Buildings: From Research to Applications ASCE 41-17: A First Look Monitoring, Serviceability and Smart Bridges Seismic – Bridge Analysis
Friday, April 7, 2017
TRACK
BLAST AND DISPROPORTIONATE COLLAPSE ASCE 7-16
MASONRY/ PERFORMANCEBASED DESIGN
OPTIMIZATION AND INNOVATION/
COLORADO
STRUCTURES BRIDGE PRACTICE BRIDGE RESEARCH
8:00 AM – 9:30 AM
Challenges in Modeling Collapse of Reinforced Concrete Structures ASCE 7-16 Overview What’s New in the 2016 Edition Masonry Design and Detailing Modern Developments in Structural Optimization Rail Bridges Seismic – Concrete Bridges
10:00 AM – 11:30 AM
2:00 PM – 3:30 PM
4:00 PM – 5:30 PM
Use of Numerical Techniques in the New Alternative Load Path Analysis Guidelines ASCE 7-16 Seismic: Learn from the Experts Masonry Inspection, Evaluation and Research Innovative Systems and Components Long Span Bridges Resilience and Sustainability
Blast and Disproportionate Collapse Resistance of Pre-Cast/Pre-Stressed Concrete Construction ASCE 7-16 Wind: Learn from the Experts Performance-Based Design Iconic Colorado Structures The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Long-Term Bridge Performance (LTBP) Program Analysis and Fatigue in Steel Bridges
Recent Applications of Disproportionate Collapse Analysis to New and Existing Building Design ASCE 7-16 Tsunami: The New Resiliency Approach and Design Provisions Seismic Behavior of Steel Columns – Experimental Findings, Nonlinear Modeling & Evaluation Criteria for PerformanceBased Earthquake Engineering Selected Colorado Contributors to Engineered Concrete Structures Innovative Solutions using Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC) Bridge Analysis and Modeling
Saturday, April 8, 2017
TRACK
BLAST AND DISPROPORTIONATE COLLAPSE
EXPANSIVE SOIL/ COLD FORMED STEEL DISPROPORTIONATE
COLLAPSE/WIND STEEL BRIDGE PRACTICE BRIDGE RESEARCH
8:00 AM – 9:30 AM
10:00 AM – 11:30 AM
Updates to the ASCE Manual of Practice, Structural Design for Physical Security Expansive Soils: A Force To Be Reckoned With Guidelines for Alternative Load Path Analysis The AISC 15th Ed. Steel Construction Manual Reuse of Bridge Foundation: Technical Challenges and Developments Autonomous Condition Assessment of Transportation Infrastructure
Novel Techniques for Progressive Collapse Analysis Cold-Formed Steel Topics Wind Engineering Steel Fatigue and Fracture Assessment of Bridge Resilience and Development of Retrofit Methods Structural Health and Performance Monitoring of Railroad Infrastructure
Register early and save. For more information including registration and housing, visit our website at www.structurescongress.org.
EDUCATION/ SUSTAINABILITY RESEARCH PROFESSIONAL
PRACTICE 1 BUSINESS PRACTICE NATURAL DISASTER NONBUILDING STRUCTURES
Enhancing Recruitment of Graduate Students Through Active Organizational Participation Designing Beyond Strength – Mentoring and Teaching the Importance of Aesthetics and Performance
Still in Use: Structural Engineering History and Contemporary Design Practice
Sustainability Condition Assessment of Structural Systems under Service Loads
Health Monitoring Successful Successions: Planning for Leadership Transitions in a Structural Engineering Firm Lateral Analysis: Right Way/ Wrong Way with Software Ethics for the Practicing Engineer An Overview of the M7.8 April 16, 2016 Ecuador Earthquake
For the Entrepreneurs – The Business of Consulting Structural Engineers ASCE/SEI Assessment of the Chile Earthquake of 2010 Extreme Loads on Offshore Structures 1
Extreme Loads on Offshore Structures 2
Innovations in Sustainable and Resilient Structural Materials
Progress in Innovative Mass Timber and Timber Hybrid Structural Systems Changing Structural Engineering Workforce and Work Places: Challenges and Opportunities Technology and Our Profession- How Do We Keep Our Sanity? Politics and Public Policy for Civil Engineers Advances in Determination of Snow and Wind Loads
BIM: Management, Marketing, and Merit Topics in Pre-Disaster Planning Scenarios, Post-Disaster Response, and Utilizing Drones for Structural Condition Assessments Foundations for Nonbuilding Structures
Constructability Issues for Nonbuilding Structures
IES
Natural Disasters-Wind, Waves, and Shaking STRUCTURES UNDER EXTREME LOADS
New Research Frontiers in Structural Resistance to Fire
Bridge Practices Structural Fire Engineering Design Practice
Seismic Assessment Seismic Performance of Structures CASE
Contractual Risk Transfers for Professionals: Mastering Indemnity, Insurance and the Standard of Care
Construction Administration as a Risk Management Tool CLAIMS NATURAL DISASTER
Resolving an Engineering/ Construction Dispute using Litigation and Mediation Tornado Characterization, Modeling and Simulation
Sharing the Story of a Real Claim Defamation, Libel and Slander Tornado Loading and Building Response
Projects with the Largest Losses and Claim Frequency The Story of a Claim Resolved by Mediation Induced Seismicity Issues for Structural Engineers
NONBUILDING STRUCTURES & NONSTRUCTURAL COMPONENTS
Seismic Effects on Water Facilities
Storage Racks
Topics in Performance of Nonstructural Components
Materials, Testing and Computational Modeling Challenges in Modeling Collapse of Reinforced Concrete Structures Tackling Today’s Business Practice Challenges – A Structural Engineering Roundtable Sharing the Story of a Real Claim The Condo Panel Discussion: New ASCE/SEI Standard for Estimation of Tornado Wind Speeds Seismic Response of Nonstructural Components
EDUCATION FORENSICS
PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE – STORIES INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE RESILIENT AND SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TODAY
New Trends in Structural Engineering Education and Mentoring
Industry/Academic Capstone Model Program Forensic Investigations of Structural Damages and Failures – Part 1
Forensic Investigations of Structural Damages and Failures – Part 2 Structural Engineering Business Innovations
A Few Stories to Ease the Everyday Tensions Gaining a Foothold in International Engineering Work
Working Internationally – Codes, Ethics, and Work Life Balance: A Young Professionals Perspective
View the interactive Technical Program, including all presenters and abstracts at www.structurescongress.org.
Building Resilient and Sustainable Communities: Engineering Advances
Building Resilient and Sustainable Communities: Including Sociological Impacts in Engineering Practice Calculating Your Professional Risk(s): The Fewer Moving Parts, the Better
Complex Structures
CASE in Point
Foundation 3: Planning – Plan to be Claims Free • Must have a plan for the firm to be claims free. • Train staff to plan, then implement the plan. • The plan needs to be simple, understandable, and inclusive to be effective. • Have Policies and Procedures that are workable and followed. • Communicate and repetitively reinforce the plan. • The plan may need to adjust as conditions change.
Tool 3-1 A Risk Management Program Planning Structure This tool is designed to help a Firm Principal design a Risk Management Program for his or her firm. The tool consists of a grid template that will help focus thoughts on where risk may arise in various aspects of their engineering practice and how to mitigate those risks. Once the risk factor is identified, a policy and procedure for how to respond to that risk is developed. This tool contains 10 sample risk factors with accompanying policies and procedures to illustrate how one might get started. The tool is designed to insert custom risks and policies to tailor it to individual firms. Tool 3-2 Staffing and Revenue Projection Firms are provided a simple to use and easy to manipulate spreadsheet-based tool for predicting the staff that will be necessary to complete both “booked” and “potential” projects. The spreadsheet can be further utilized to track historical staffing demand to assist with future staffing and revenue projections.
Tool 3-3 Website Resource Tool This tool lists website links that contain information that could be useful for a Structural Engineer. A brief description of the website is also included. For example, there is information about doing business across state lines, information regarding the responsibility of the Engineer of Record for each state, links to each State’s Licensing Board, and more.
Tool 3-4 Project Work Plan Templates Preparing and maintaining a proper Project Work Plan is a fundamental responsibility of a project manager. Work Plans document project delivery strategies and communicate them to the team members. Project Managers will use this template to create a project Work Plan that will be stored with the project documents. You can purchase these and the other Risk
Management Tools at www.acec.org/bookstore.
CASE Risk Management Convocation in Denver, CO
April 7, 2017
The CASE Risk Management Convocation will be held in conjunction with the Structures Congress at the Hyatt Regency Denver and Colorado Convention Center in Denver, CO, April 6 – 8, 2017. For more information and updates go to www.structurescongress.org. The following CASE Convocation sessions are scheduled to take place on Friday, April 7: 8:00 am – 9:30 am Contractual Risk Transfers for Professionals: Mastering Indemnity, Insurance and the Standard of Care Moderator/Speaker: Ryan J. Kohler, Collins, Collins, Muir + Stewart, LLP 10:00 am – 11:30 am Construction Administration as a Risk Management Tool Moderator/Speaker: Daniel T. Buelow, Willis Towers Watson 2:00 pm – 3:30 pm Projects with the Largest Losses and Claim Frequency Moderator: Mr. Timothy J. Corbett, SmartRisk Speaker: Brian Stewart, Esq., Collins, Collins, Muir + Stewart, LLP 4:00 pm – 5:30 pm Tackling Today’s Business Practice Challenges – A Structural Engineering Roundtable Moderator: David W. Mykins, P.E., Stroud Pence & Associates
Market Leaders, Celebrities to Star at ACEC Convention
Top executives and distinguished public figures will highlight the 2017 ACEC Convention in Washington, D.C., April 23 – 26. 1,500 participants are expected. Jacque Hinman, CH2M chair/CEO; Fred Werner, AECOM president, design and consulting services; and Greg Kelly, WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff president/CEO, U.S. and South America, will discuss industry prospects with Fortune magazine Senior Editor Geoff Colvin. Former White House Director of Communications Nicolle Wallace will kick off the Convention, which will also include Members of Congress, Cook Political Report Editor Amy Walter, Pennsylvania Secretary of Transportation Leslie Richards, and many other notable speakers. TV star Kevin Nealon will host the 50th Anniversary Gala of the Engineering Excellence Awards. For more information and to register, www.acec.org/conferences/annual-convention-2017. Applying Expertise as an Engineering Expert Witness June 15 –16, 2017; Boston, MA
Engineers are often asked to serve as expert witnesses in legal proceedings – but only the prepared and prudent engineer should take on these potentially lucrative assignments. If asked, would you be ready to say yes? This unique course developed exclusively for engineers, architects, and surveyors, will show you how to prepare for and successfully provide expert testimony for discovery, depositions, the witness stand, and related legal proceedings. Applying Expertise as an Engineering Expert Witness is a focused and engaging 1½ day course that will run you through each step of the qualifications, ramifications, and expectations of serving as an expert witness. For more information about the course, please contact Katie Goodman 202-682-4377 or kgoodman@acec.org.
Public-Private Partnerships and Design-Build
Opportunities and Risks for Consulting Engineers
P3 and DB approaches on public infrastructure projects continue to increase, leaving consulting engineers with more questions than ever. That is why, to make conscientious, prudent decisions about P3 and DB project opportunities and risks, you need access to reliable expertise and the latest knowledge. The second edition of Public-Private Partnerships and DesignBuild: Opportunities and Risks for Consulting Engineers presents new industry information and experience on P3 and DB approaches and offers timely recommendations about the rewards, challenges, and risk exposures for engineering firms looking to succeed in today’s still-evolving P3 and DB project work environment. New to the Second Edition: • DB opportunities, roles, risks, and contracting practices • Dispute resolution processes in P3s and DB
• Contractual availability and sound implementation of fair and appropriate dispute resolution processes in the assessment and management of P3 and DB projects Readers will also find updated information on risk allocation and professional liability issues specific to P3 and DB projects. Edited by David Hatem and Patricia Gary of Donovan Hatem LLP, along with the contributions of 14 subject matter experts, Public-Private Partnerships and Design-Build: Opportunities and Risks for Consulting Engineers, Second Edition provides an objective, realistic, and practical resource for you to make informed and balanced judgments about pursuing P3 and DB projects.NCSEA members can contact Heather Talbert (htalbert@acec.org) about obtaining this book at the ACEC Member Price of $99.
Donate to the CASE Scholarship Fund!
The ACEC Council of American Structural Engineers (CASE) is currently seeking contributions to help make the structural engineering scholarship program a success. The CASE scholarship, administered by the ACEC College of Fellows, is awarded to a student seeking a Bachelor’s degree, at a minimum, in an ABET-accredited engineering program. Since 2009, the CASE Scholarship program has given $20,000 to help engineering students pave their way to a bright future in structural engineering. We have all witnessed the stiff competition from other disciplines and professions eager to obtain the best and brightest young talent from a dwindling pool of engineering graduates. One way to enhance the ability of students in pursuing their dreams to become professional engineers is to offer incentives in educational support. Your monetary support is vital in helping CASE and ACEC increase scholarships to those students who are the future of our industry. Contact Heather Talbert at htalbert@acec.org to donate.
Share Innovative Ideas!
Does your firm have an innovative idea or method of practice? Looking to get more involved in short duration projects? We are inviting you to “share the wealth” and submit a proposal for a web seminar topic, publication, or education session you would like to see CASE present at an upcoming conference. Our forms are easy to use, and you may submit your information via email. Go to www.acec.org/coalitions and click on the icon for ‘Idea Sharing’ to get started. Questions? Contact us at 202-682-4332 or email Katie Goodman at kgoodman@acec.org. We look forward to helping you put your best ideas in front of eager new faces!
