Design Portfolio
Tamanna Tiku Urban Design + Architecture September 2018
TAMANNA TIKU
540-200-5546 tamanna_tiku@berkeley.edu linkedin.com/in/tamanna-tiku issuu.com/tamannatiku
Urban Design, Architecture
SKILLS
EDUCATION Masters of Urban Design, College of Environmental Design, University of California Berkeley, CA GPA: 3.89 August 2017 – August 2018
Bachelors of Architecture, College of Architecture + Urban Studies, Virginia Tech, VA Major: Architecture, Minor: Mathematics GPA: 3.76 August 2012 – August 2017
Proficient: Adobe Suite, AutoCAD, MS Suite, Model-making, Hand drafting Familiar: Rhino, ArcGIS, SketchUp, Grasshopper
OTHER EXPERIENCES
KEY PROJECTS Masters Thesis: Harnessing Vulnerabilities: Resource-management strategies for enduring livability in the slums of Dhaka, Bangladesh
University of Cambridge: Reciprocal Resilience: Addressing London’s Industrial and Housing Crises in Old Oak Common
Resilience by Design Competition: From Burden To Asset: A ‘leaf’ for the vulnerable region situated south of San Francisco in Baylands, California
Undergraduate Thesis: Growth and Decay: A new vision for abandoned cemeteries in New Delhi, India
Jan 2018 – Apr 2018
May 2018 – Aug 2018
Aug 2016 - May 2017
Aug 2017 - Dec 2017
1. Department of Architecture, University of Cambridge Feb 2018 - Mar2018
2. Center of Architecture, Sustainability and Art (CASA), Mexico City May 2016 – Jul 2016
3. Teaching Volunteer, Design Apprenticeship Program, National Building Museum, Washington DC Sep 2015 – Nov 2015
LEADERSHIP
WORK EXPERIENCE Urban Design Intern, SOM, San Francisco Developed design proposals, schematic design and base drawings for projects based in Xi’an, China and Hanoi, Vietnam. This included building physical models, working on precedent research and developing documents for competition-entries. The necessary skill development for these processes was in softwares like Rhino and InDesign. Every project required teamwork and multi-tasking. Jun 2018 - Aug 2018
Graphic Designer, Humans on the Run, Oxford University Press Represented the geographical aspects of the struggle of immigrants, refugees and humans on the run in the face of international political turmoil Aug 2017 - Dec 2017
Graduate Student Researcher, UC Berkeley Researched aesthetic performance of sustainable urban design in cities around the world for a publication tentatively titled ‘Constructing Meaning in the Performative City’ Jan 2018 - May 2018
Graphic Designer and Student Assistant, Berkeley International Office Designed some annual publications, managed the front desk and learnt record-keeping Aug 2017 - Dec 2017
Architecture Intern, ADO, NOIDA, India Participated in international design competitions, developed drafting skills, got familiarized with material availability, needs, and local strategies unique to the Indian market Jun 2015 - Aug 2015
1. Admissions Chair, Urban Design, CEDSOC, UC Berkeley Jan 2018 – July 2018
2. Founding Member, SCOPE, Virginia Tech Nov 2016 – May 2017
3. Curator, Other Urbanisms, UC Berkeley Mar 2018 - Apr 2018
4. Cultural Secretary, Indian Student Association, Virginia Tech, VA Aug 2016 – May 2017
LANGUAGES English, Hindi, Urdu, Kashmiri
contents
Project Sites Education + Experiences
from west to east:
1
2
Baylands, California Resilience by Design, 2017
San Francisco, California GIS Project, 2018
Burden to Asset
Access to Sanitation
3
4
Rosslyn, Virginia WAAC, Alexandria, 2016
Old Oak Common, London University of Cambridge, 2018
Urban Transect
5
Growth and Decay
NOIDA, India Undergraduate Thesis, 2017
Reciprocal Resilience
6
Harnessing Vulnerabilities Dhaka, Bangladesh Masters Thesis, 2018
burden to asset A leaf for the region Brisbane, California The Bay Area is facing serious threats of climate change and sea level rise. It is also highly prone to social inequity and a massive housing crisis. In such a dire scenario, the lack of interest in the development of 950 acres along the Bay is a massive burden on the region.
Wind Energy Generation along revamped highway 101
Big regional amenities:
A floodable Lake along Bayshore Blvd
200 m
104 m
retail garden residential parking area
152 m spring rays winter rays 60 m
63 m
57 m
85 m
65 m
B
C
D
14.00 60.00 10.00 60.00 5
15
200.00 0
30
oďŹƒce retail garden residential parking area
275.00
60.00
10.00
60.00
A
spring rays winter rays
For an entirely new development that was addressing the Bay Area’s housing areas, attracting diverse users was essential. This was carried out through integrated block-types and building types.
access to sanitation
Analysis of the available toilet facilities along the BART in downtown San Francisco San Francisco, CA
IDENTIFYING THE PROBLEM Geo-Referencing + Network Analysis
This study began with a hunch that San Francisco's BART corridor is underserved in terms of sanitation infrastructure. This is a major public inconvenience. Thus, this research began with a count of the available free public toilet facilities around San Francisco that were provided by the San Francisco Public Works (SFPW) department. These were 40 and spread across the city. We proceeded to demarcate the regions of Demand (10 minutes from the BART stops) and the areas of supply (5 minutes from each facility) and marked the under-served areas in the BART corridor.
This study was conducted to: 1. Analyze pedestrian access to sanitation infrastructure within 10 minutes walking distance of the 8 BART stations in San Francisco. 2. Assess the opportunities and constraints in the proposal of Research Existing Conditions the Problem along 01 Identify 02the new Sanitation facilities BART corridor.03 Proposal for New Locations 3. Conduct a network analysis to locate new facilities.
ASSESSING LOCAL CONDITIONS Suitability Analysis
Data Collection
01
Locate BART line and stations within SF boundary
02
Locate existing free public restrooms (SFPW) in SF
03
Mark Demand Area within 10 min walking of BART stations through Service Area Analysis
04
Mark Supply Area within 5 min walking of existing restrooms through Service Area Analysis
01 02
Locate existing free public restrooms (SFPW) in SF
https://datasf.org/opendata/ http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tsip/gis/datalibrary/Metadata/BART_13.html https://nationalmap.gov/
04
05
Google Earth
Identify Opportunity variables
Identify Constraint variables
02
Buffer the variables with weightages
Buffer the variables with weightages
03
Union the buffered layers and add the weightages to get the most suitable and least suitable locations to add more toilets
04
Locate BART line and stations within SF boundary
03
01
Existing Conditions 02ClipResearch the Suitability analysis to 1mile distance
Geo-referencing, Network Analysis
01
Extract Neighborhood Parks based on results of Suitability Analysis
02
Using Bart Stations as Demand points and Neighborhood Parks as Facilities, Solve the Network Analysis using Location Allocation
Constraints
Suitability Analysis
Served
DATA COLLECTION SOURCES:
+
Opportunities
Find intersection of the Demand and Identify the Problem 01 05 Service Areas to get the Area Not
Data Collection
from the BART line to focus the analysis in the relevant area
+
Opportunities
Extract Neighborhood Parks based on results of Suitability Analysis
02
Using Bart Stations as Demand points and Neighborhood Parks as Facilities, Solve the Network Analysis using Location Allocation
Constraints
Suitability Analysis
_ !
02
Locate existing free public restrooms (SFPW) in SF
03
Mark Demand Area within 10 min walking of BART stations through Service Area Analysis
Find intersection of the Demand and Service Areas to get the Area Not Served
Google Earth
Neighborhood Parks _ !
Green Street Network Retail Corridors
10 min
+3
5 min
+2
10 min
+2
5 min
+1
5 min
+1
https://nationalmap.gov/ Google Earth
Water Bodies Sidewalk < 12ft _ !
_ !
_ !
_ ! ! _
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ ! _ !
04
Clip the Suitability analysis to 1mile distance from the BART line to focus the analysis in the relevant area
PROPOSING NEW LOCATIONS Network Analysis
¡¥
_ !
_ !
_ !
10 min
-3
Libraries ! _
5 min
-3
Malls
5 min
-3
Public Museums
5 min
-3
Gas Stations
5 min
-2
Existing SFPW Toilets
5 min
-2
0
! _ _ !
0.5
_ ! _ !
_ !
G
_ !
G
_ !
Legend G
_ !
G
BART STATION BART LINE
_ ! _ !
PUBLIC RESTROOM
SUITABILITY
_ !
SUITABILITY ANALYSIS
G
-32 - -15
_ !
-14 - -8
G _ !
-7 - -4 -3 - 0 1-9
_ !
G
G
1
G
-10
City Parks
_ !
_ !
-20 ! _
_ !
5 min
Buffer the variables with weightages
Union the buffered layers and add the weightages to get the most suitable and least suitable locations to add more toilets
_ !
_ !
WEIGHTAGE
0 min
Buffer the variables with weightages
03
Malls, Museums, SFPW Restrooms, Libraries, Gas stations, Sidewalks (lesser than 12’), City Parks, Water bodies
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tsip/gis/datalibrary/Metadata/BART_13.html
_ ! BUFFER
02
Retail Corridors, Neighborhood Open Spaces, Green Network Connections, Sidewalks(wider than 12’), SF BART stations
https://datasf.org/opendata/
_ !
CONSTRAINTS
Identify Constraint variables
This Location Allocation analysis was conducted while considering nearby Neighborhood Parks as the possible locations for sanitation facilities. We clipped all the neighborhood parks outside of out Opportunity Field and then proceeded to allocate in 16 or 8 'Facilities to choose' so as to study the locations for either 2 sanitation facilities per BART stop or 1 fcility per BART stop.
Malls, Museums, SFPW Restrooms, Libraries, Gas stations, Sidewalks (lesser than 12’), City Parks, Water bodies
Sidewalk >/= 12ft
Using Bart Stations as Demand points and Neighborhood Parks as Facilities, Solve the Network Analysis using Location Allocation
Identify Opportunity variables
_ !
https://datasf.org/opendata/
https://nationalmap.gov/
Extract Neighborhood Parks based on results of Suitability Analysis
Mark Supply Area within 5 min walking of existing restrooms through Service Area Analysis
DATA COLLECTION SOURCES:
_ !
BUFFER WEIGHTAGE Retail Corridors, Neighborhood Open Spaces, Green Network Connections, Sidewalks(wider than 12’), SF BART stations
SFhttp://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tsip/gis/dataliBART brary/Metadata/BART_13.html
Network Analysis : Location Allocation
Locate BART line and stations within SF boundary
05
03 Proposal for New Locations
All the following conditions were studied within a 1 mile buffer of the BART 01 Opportunities Constraints + Corridor in San Fransisco, in order 02to focus the analysis on the relevant area. Suitability Analysis The toilet prototype we used for this study was the San Francisco Public Works 01 (SFPW) facility, which is 1 ft X 1 ft in footprint.
01
04
Network Analysis : Location Allocation 01
02 Research Existing Conditions
Geo-referencing, Network Analysis
03 Proposal for New Locations
Identify OpportuniIdentify Constraint Mark Demand Area within 10 minNeighborhood Open 01 Spaces, Retail Corridors, Green Network ty variables variables walking of BART stations through Connections, Sidewalks(wider than 12’), SF BART stations Service Area Analysis Buffer the variables 02 Buffer the variables with weightages with weightages Mark Supply AreaMalls, withinMuseums, 5 min SFPW Restrooms, Libraries, Gas stations, Sidewalks (lesser than 12’), City Parks, Water bodies walking of existing restrooms Union the buffered layers and add the through Service Area Analysis 03 weightages to get the most suitable and least suitable locations to add more toilets Find intersection of the Demand and Service Areas to get the Area Not Clip the Suitability analysis to 1mile distance Served 04 from the BART line to focus the analysis in the relevant area
OPPORTUNITIES DATA COLLECTION SOURCES:
01 Identify the Problem
Collection NetworkData Analysis : Location Allocation
Geo-referencing, Network Analysis
2 Miles
_ !
¡¥
_ !
_ ! _ ! ! _
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
0
! _ _ !
0.5
_ !
G
_ !
Legend
_ !
_ ! _ !
_ !
G
_ !
_ !
G
BART STATION
G _ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
BART LINE
_ !
_ !
_ !
RESTROOM SERVICE AREA
G
RESTROOM SERVICE AREA
_ ! _ !
_ ! ! _
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
9 8
_ !
7
_ !
G
G
1
¡¥
_ !
_ !
10
G
1. SFPW Restroom Locations and Service Areas 2. BART Stations and Demand Area (10 minutes) 3. Demand Areas not served by existing Restroom Service Areas 4. SFPW Restroom Locations and Service Areas 5. Opportunity distribution within a mile of the BART Corridor 6. Suitability Analysis within a mile of the BART Corridor 7. Location Allocation of 8 sanitation facilities in the Opportunity Area
_ !
PUBLIC RESTROOM
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
2 Miles
G
_ !
_ !
1
¡¥
_ !
0
! _ _ !
0.5
_ ! _ !
_ !
_ !
G
2 Miles
G
BART STATION
_ !
Legend
G
BART LINE _ !
BART STATION
G
PUBLIC RESTROOM
BART LINE
AREA NOT SERVED
_ !
_ !
_ !
1
G
Legend
G
_ !
G
_ ! _ !
_ !
0.5
G
_ !
_ !
0
_ !
G
_ !
_ ! _ !
_ !
2 Miles
G
_ !
_ !
1
AREA NOT SERVED
G
G
_ ! _ !
G
G
_ !
_ !
G
G
G
_ !
2 ¡¥
_ !
_ ! _ ! ! _
G
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
3 ¡¥
_ !
_ ! _ ! ! _
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
0
! _ _ !
0.5
_ ! _ !
_ !
Legend G
_ !
_ !
_ ! _ !
_ !
_ !
_ ! _ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
PUBLIC RESTROOM
_ !
CONSTRAINTS
G _ !
_ !
_ !
PUBLIC RESTROOM
Opp2Wt
_ !
_ !
1
_ !
2
_ !
-32 - -18
3
G
-17 - -15
_ !
4
_ !
5
-14 - -10
6
-9 - -2
7
_ !
_ !
G
¡¥
_ ! _ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
9
G
4
_ ! _ ! ! _
8
G
G
_ !
_ !
5 ¡¥
_ !
_ ! _ ! ! _
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ ! _ ! _ ! _ !
G
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ ! _ !
_ !
1
_ !
2 Miles _ !
_ !
G _ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
PUBLIC RESTROOM
* I _ !
G
_ !
_ ! _ !
_ !
_ !
* I
* I G
-5 - 0
_ !
1-9
BART STATION
* I
8 NEW RESTROOMS
_ !
PUBLIC RESTROOM POSSIBLE LOCATIONS
_ !
-7 - -6
2 Miles
BART LINE
_ !
_ !
-14 - -8
G
_ !
1
Legend
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
0.5
G
_ !
IG *
-32 - -15
_ !
_ !
_ !
0
* I
G
_ ! _ !
AnlysWt2
_ !
G
G
* ! I G _
BART STATION BART LINE
_ !
! _ _ !
* I
_ !
Legend
SUITABILITY ANALYSIS
_ ! _ !
G
G
_ ! _ !
0.5
G
_ !
_ !
0
! _ _ !
_ !
BART STATION BART LINE
_ !
_ !
2 Miles
OPPOTUNITY
-35 - -33
G
_ !
_ !
_ !
_ !
G
_ !
_ !
G
G
CONSTRAINS AREA
_ !
_ !
G
_ !
_ ! _ !
BART STATION BART LINE
1
Legend
_ !
G
_ !
G
_ !
0.5
G
_ !
G
0
! _ _ !
_ !
G
_ !
_ !
2 Miles _ !
_ !
_ ! _ !
_ !
1
G
_ !
SUITABILITY ANALYSIS AnlysWt2 -32 - -15 -14 - -8 -7 - -6 -5 - 0 1-9
_ !
_ !
G
G
* I
6
G
G
7
urban transect
Baths for Bikers and a Connection to the Waterfront Rosslyn, VA
Urban infrastructure and the George Washington Parkway presently separate the city of Rosslyn from its neglected waterfront. Proposal: A linear transect through the city of Rosslyn that choreographs varied interactions between the human body and different moods of water, until it meets the river. The baths, rising and falling with the earth to form an accessible built hardscape for bikers and pedestrians, become a joint between the cityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s dense urbanity and the edge of the Potomac.
C
D
A
B
A
C
B
D
C
D
A
B
A
B
AA
BB
CC
Showers for bikers
Waterwall for summer days Swimming Pool
There are two walls. Within the walls, the visitor interacts with water to cleanse, partake in recreation, swim, dip and contemplate. The progression from the city to the Potomac is marked by a rise in the volume of oaks on the transect, an increased sense of quiet and a lesser vigorous presence of water. At the end of the pathway is a staircase that descends to the edge of the river. The descent offers moments of pause.
AA
Showers for bikes
CC
Dipping Pool
C
D
E
C
D
E
F
G
EE
F DD
FF
Walkway
G
Sunbathing Room (above) Hot Dipping Pools (below)
Sauna Rooms (above) Cafe with a view (below)
EE
GG
Hot Private Dipping Pools
Moments of pause
GG
Appoach to the Potomac
reciprocal resilience Addressing Londonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Industrial and Housing Crises Old Oak Common, London London is going through a housing shortage as well as a rapid displacement of local industry. This project brings the two crises together instead of addressing them separately. The vision is to build community around local industry and retail and to celebrate local micro-industry through street bazaars.
The High Speed Rail is coming to London
The neighboring Park Royale is considered the kitchen of London
The existing ecology of the Grand Union canal must be preserved
Block Type 1 A residential block for economically and socially diverse users
Block Type 2 A mixed-use block with street-facing ground floor PDR and interior residential buildings - amply served by alleys for loading and docking
Block Type 3 A block with all ground floors dedicated to PDR and residential units ranging from apartments to micro-units
Block Type 1 Residential courtyards, activated by a central park and criss-crossing alleys to slow down the vehicles and accentuate the pedestrian experience.
Block Type 3
Activated inner-block courtyards with maker-spaces, exhibition areas and alleys shared by vehicles as well as pedestrians
Block Type 2 An activated street with customized ground floor uses
+42.00 +32.00
+32.00
Train Station
+ 42.00 +36.00
+42.00
+32.00
+32.00 +20.00
+ 42.00 +36.00
Canal Park
Areas between the restored Rolls Royce building and the Canal Park, activated by street bazaars
The curvilinear street by the Grand Union Canal, activated by boat bazaars, ground floor retail, and bridges across the canal.
growth and decay
A New Vision for Abandoned Cemeteries in Residential Contexts NOIDA, India
As the body withers, the tree grows.
How might a place reflect the inevitably connected occurrences of decay, birth, and growth â&#x20AC;&#x201C; inherently distinct in nature, but leading to one another as time goes on? 2020
2030
2050
In the densely populated outskirts of New Delhi, residential mid-rises surround a park. This park lends refreshing moments of rest and activity to the neighborhood. How might a cemetery in this park begin a conversation about the sensitive acknowledgment of death within an active part of the city? This confrontation of loss through a living cemetery instead of a lifeless graveyard is a medium for the dead to fuel life into a place that becomes a living, evolving entity itself. The place then becomes a marker of the cycles of time.
Section A
Key Plan
Section A
Section B Section C
Section B
PRAYER ROOM A courtyard and a room for reflection.
Section C
PREPARATION ROOM Two rooms - one for preparing the body for burial and one for the rest of the living.
Section A
Key Plan
Section B
Section A
Section B
Key Plan
MEMORIAL ROOMS Many rooms in a courtyard, stitched together by the memory of the deceased.
Section A Section B
Section A
Section B
harnessing vulnerabilities
Resource Management Strategies for Enduring Livability Dhaka, Bangladesh
Dhaka is one of the worldâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s largest metropolises with a population of 18 million people. But it faces serious hazards - natural as well as social. There is massive socio-economic inequity with 33% of ts population residing in informal settlements and it is also the capital of one of the worldâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s most climate-change vulnerable countries. It is prone to flooding due to the decrease in its wetland spread and also is a recipient of other Bangladeshi villagers who arrive in Dhaka to evade the lack of employment opportunities as well as the tidal nature of their geographical locations.
PERPETUAL CYCLE OF LOSS DHAKA
CLIMATE CHANGE
TIDAL VILLAGES
Wetland cover, 1978
VULNERABLE AREAS
DISEASES + DECAY
1988
1998
2008
Light and Air
Water
In the heart of Dhaka is the informal settlement â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Korailâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;. This settlement is an anomaly since most other such settlements often occur at the periphery of the city where residents can find employment at the peripheral industrial areas. Built on the edges of Lake Banani, Korail is very prone to flooding since it has been informally constructed with the use of solid-waste landfill. The residents face health and security hazards due to waterlogging, regular fires due to faulty electric connections, a lack of air and light in the tin-shacks and the lack of a streamlined waste-management program.
Waste
Fire
Exisiting Condition
Re-Opening the channel
Constructing a productive levee
A network of sponges
Key streets for emergency access
Key streets for drainage
Identifying sponges and lungs on the key streets
Productive ground floors in the Nodes
Higher density housing in the Nodes
A more productive edge, that ensures safety and mobility
Exisiting Condition
Proposed Condition
A higher density housing intervention that compliments the anthropological scale of the settlement and uses design elements that are prevalent throughout Korail as well as rural Bangladesh
Existing block
Units selected for removal
Newly available ground
Amended ground
Smaller scale interventions in the blocks away from the â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Nodesâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;
Interlocking pavers built of waste - to keep the waste economy going - for the refurbishment of all existing street-scapes so as to turn all of Korail in to a sponge for Dhaka
tamanna_tiku@berkeley.edu 540-200-5546