Designing Cluster Evaluation How design can support creative collaboration
i
Contents
Foreword Timeline and other notes The first workshop The second workshop Designing new ways to engage Hot topics: targets Reflections and next steps Appendix A: FAQs
2 4 6
12 20 24 26 28
1
1 Foreword: Sharing new approaches in cluster evaluation
As interest in clusters has grown amongst companies, practitioners and policy makers, the need for effective evaluation has also risen, not least to be able to show the return on investment from such initiatives. However, cluster measurement and evaluation has long been a source of frustration: how to properly capture the impact of the investment in clusters. Evaluation of clusters is thus a complex area, involving different levels and diverse audiences. Cluster evaluation frameworks need to not only focus on measuring the final outcome (the effect), but also the softer, more qualitative elements, including the benefits of greater trust and collaboration, as well as the process of change. In order to explore this further the Cluster Evaluation Working Group was formed in 2013 to share experience, capture joint learning, and work together to develop new and better approaches to show the value of collaboration and demonstrate return on investment. The Institute of Design Innovation (InDI) took a lead role in driving forward this working group because of our interest and involvement in cluster development. InDI uses design to build complex
2
collaborations and help organisations deliver things together that they cannot do alone, but we also explore how to better evidence the more intangible effects of clustering - the ‘how’ as well as the ‘why’as there are parallels with evidencing the value of design. In addition, we have been exploring the role of design in helping diverse expertise be effectively shared on a complex subject through the working group activities. This booklet summarises the first two years of the working group, during which time over 50 people from more than 25 nations and regions have participated in sessions. We hope this helps capture our collective knowledge and work so far, and informs future strands of work. True to the nature of clusters, by sharing and collaborating we can do more than by working alone. Madeline Smith, Head of Strategy, Institute of Design Innovation, Member of the Board of Directors, TCI
3
2 Timeline and other notes
Cluster evaluation fundamentals Evaluation of clusters is a complex area, involving different levels and diverse audiences. Evaluation is a learning process, the outputs of which should feedback into future policy and interventions. It is not just audit.
At a glance: Clusters evaluation learnings As cluster evaluation approaches have become more sophisticated they have expanded to include: Looking at activity (numbers involved and engaged with the cluster) Capturing the difference that this activity is making, both to the companies and to
June 2013
September 2013
Forres, Scotland
Presentation, Conference
First meeting
4
the region
TCI conference – Plenary
exhibition, subgroup meeting
Understanding the processes that help build a successful cluster, and how the social capital and trust generated in clusters can be maximised Cluster evaluation frameworks therefore need to not only focus on measuring the final outcome (the effect), but also the softer, more qualitative elements, including the benefits of greater trust and collaboration, and also the process of change (how this happened)
April 2014
Working group meeting Belfast NI
November 2014 TCI conference
presentation session
5
6
3 The first workshop Forres, 2013
Cluster evaluation enthusiasts from nine different countries gathered in the beautiful north of Scotland for the first meeting of the TCI working group. Key themes for discussion included the fundamental role of evaluation: What has been achieved by the cluster? (Effectiveness) How well have they done this? (Efficiency) Were these the right things to be doing? (relevance: different circumstances) How was this achieved? (Understanding process)
Germany:
To design an evaluation there needs to be an
‘This was one of the
understanding of:
best organised European workshop experiences ... I found
The cluster actors: who is involved, participants, partners, stakeholders
it very interesting to
The cluster organisation: how is this organised
see how different kinds
The conditions in which the cluster operates
of methods are used... I hope we can catch up
(external context ) The behaviours, including trust (internal context)
with this group further to come up with... a unique evaluation system for European clusters.’
7
Overall evaluations should consider capturing: The Why: Ultimately the impact must be measured in sector growth and the change in the regional economic structure. The What: Cluster interventions focus on building a strong business environment and improving the competitiveness of the companies (the ‘what’ of a cluster programme: access to finance, skills and talent, infrastructure, knowledge and innovation, and market access and global positioning.) The How: Social capital is the core of the cluster approach building competitiveness by bringing partners together. Capturing the level of partnership and collaboration as a cluster develops can help show how these relationships have matured and deepened to give greater returns. The group had previously prepared “homework” looking at their experience of evaluation, as well as new approaches and key gaps or areas in need of development. The group discussed common themes and challenges and used these to isolate three key questions worthy of future focus:
8
Q1: How can we develop and share a TCI ‘fruit salad’ of current good practice and techniques in cluster evaluation? Q2: How do we factor in the ‘human element’ into cluster evaluations Q3: How do we evidence, back up and communicate the critical success factors in clusters?
Indicators and themes Regional
Why?
— Jobs
Benefit/Impact
— GVA — Industrial Structure — Distribution of opportunity Business environment i.e.
Cluster
What?
— Innovation performance
Projects
— Physical assets — Finance and Funding — Skills — Talent attraction/retention — Internationalisation
Partnership
How?
Connectedness
and Global Capital
— Who is involved — Type of partnership — Depth of partnership — Behavioural change
Strategic
Operational
9
Regional Benefit/Impact
Cluster Projects
10 – No of local/regional jobs indirectly dependent on the project – Degree of higher management being injected – Degree of R&D being injected – Innovative nature of the project
– Skills development – Knowledge transfers – Encouraging Foreign Direct Investment – Entrepreneurship
– Reduction of ‘Brain Drain’
– University linkages with industry
Cluster Actors
Framework
– Networking and co-operation
Services and activities to support:
Cluster Organisation
– Access to private and public financing
– Attractive environment
– Infrastructure
– Availability of qualified personnel
– Regulation, taxes
– Innovation-friendly environment
Framework Conditions
first workshop
Potential regional benefits included:
Strategic
Operational
boards designed for the
Potential wider benefits included:
Partnership – Connectedness and Social Capital
Right: ‘homework’
11
Sharing of critical sectoral knowledge
Performance of individual firms
L4 Venture Attractivness Loop
Extent of collaborative initiatives
L2 Inter-Firm Co-operation Loop
Overall performance of all firms in zone
L1 Inter-Firm Rivalry Loop
Motivation for competitive innovation
Extent of shared response to common challenges
Intensity of differentiated competitive performance
Global competition and external market pressure
Group with common agenda but little formal or informal interaction
Giving and exchanging of information. Individual Programmes still totally separate
Joint activities and communications, giving general support and endorsement of each other’s programmes, services or objectives
Joint activities and communications, joint planning and synchronisation of schedules, activities, events and objectives
Individuals, groups, organisation relinquish some autonomy and share risk, for mutual gains. True collaboration results in changes to behaviour to support collective goals
Communication
Co-operation
Co-ordination
Collaboration
(focused on their joint ‘strategic action plans’) –Continual ‘process support’
least helpful, what preferred ‘timing’ of different support, etc.) –Annual evaluation/coaching sessions with the five networks
–Additional questions in interviews with partners in the five transnational networks on the support (what’s been most/
–The cluster dynamics question set with an added ‘transnational’ level
Focus for BSR is Transnational Collaboration.
Cluster to Cluster Collaboration
L3 Collaborative Advantage Loop
Degree of enhancement of competitive innovation
Collection
Stimulation and Acquisition of relevant research and development
L5 Future Focus Loop
Competitive level of platform innovation
– Consider distributional issues such as Areas of Disadvantage and Equality.
Type of cultural context
Competitive power of cluster
Potential synergies– Potential benefits of collaboration resulting from external economies of scale and complementarity Collaboration processes– Internal and external linkages within the business environment
Target achievement – Innovation – Productivity – Internationalisation – Growth – Profitability
Conceptual model for the cluster programs
Cluster programs’ intervention in business environment
Relationship basis– The group’s ability and willingness to exploit synergies
In the longer term, structural characteristics and collaboration potential will be developed as a result of collaboration processes
Cluster Organisation
– Access to R&D partners
– PR
– Training and Coaching
– Internationalisation
Figure 1: The nutshell model of cluster intervention Source: VDI/VDE-IT 2010
4 The second workshop Belfast, 2014
The latest meeting of the Cluster Evaluation Working Group was hosted by TCI organisational members Invest NI. 25 participants from 11 different countries and regions participated in two days of sharing, developing and vigorous discussion. In previous meetings the working group had shared approaches around the ‘why’, ‘what’ and ‘how’ of cluster evaluation. Three key questions that tackle some of the biggest challenges in cluster evaluation had been identified:
Scotland:
Homework In order to maximise the time together participants
‘I think the value of
contributed ‘homework’ beforehand, to give some
coming together with
insight into current practices, and share some of the
colleagues from
remaining challenges. Across the three questions
different experiences
this pre-work explored:
has been quite worth while. I say that because I think I
How has your approach to cluster evaluation
helped address the key questions?
changed my mind on
What new approaches have worked well?
a few things through
What are still the gaps/difficulties?
the day... I have found some different
This was then collated into an exhibition format to
approaches...’
allow everyone to look across the different
12
responses and see common themes and further areas for development. The groups then divided into three, to look more closely at the three key questions, unpicking further: What does success look like? What do we already know? What gaps remain? The following day the group embarked on the Cluster Evaluation Game. It was developed by InDI for this meeting to try and garner as much collective knowledge as possible from such an experienced and practiced group. The outputs from this game are shown in appendix A. Finally, the group re-gathered for a final discussion. A few mini project ideas had been generated and those will now be taken forward by members of the group.
13
14
We are all undertaking evaluations using some broadly similar approaches (measuring activity, outputs, impacts). However, each cluster context is different (different local environments, sector structures, government support) and
How can we develop and share a TCI “Fruit Salad” of current good practice and techniques in cluster evaluation?
Question...
Diverse type of information – economic, trust level, motivation, time investment,
Baseline (where we started) and follow up (show progress and change/improvement)
Project reporting against specific strategic goals and review direction
Approaches
The How Social capital i.e. how clusters grow, towards cooperative and collaborative behaviours.
The What Cluster interventions e.g. access to finance, skills, infrastructure, knowledge and innovation, and market access.
Cluster Organisation
Benchmarking – how we compare with competitors
Comprehensive framework – Mix of statistical data, surveys, interviews, workshops/focus groups, quantitative and qualitative
Cluster Actors
Conditions (External context) Behaviours (Internal context)
for the second workshop
The Why Sector growth and the change in the regional economic structure.
Capturing progress across against why, what and how
Why, What, How?
Right: boards designed
15
“ Gather the fruits to make it edible! Develop Case study examples.”
Different techniques are needed for different layers, audiences and different contexts. Ultimately evaluation is about learning and informing the next steps.
Activities
Planned work
Resources & Inputs
Outputs
Intended deliverables
Outcome
Impact
With indictors across all levels (e.g. # of companies, did it lead to company growth, exports and jobs etc, or other associated impacts e.g. funding, collaborations with universities)
Logic models
How to show benefit /impact on regional/national economy (innovation system)?
How to show relevance and effectiveness of cluster programme approach?
How to show value of cluster initiative/cluster organisation?
How to show benefit of companies’ involvement in cluster initiatives?
Can we develop a Knowledge repository/community of practice to provide content, examples and contact people for the fruit salad, structured around:
so evaluation needs to be flexible– hence the need for a “fruit salad” - allowing each cluster/region to pick and choose the best combination for their context and situation.
Sonja Kind
Developing a not too generic tool box from which one can choose the suitable method or to become inspired”
“
Measuring change in performance, capability and understanding – across individuals, group/cluster and regional levels
Parallel approach to understand the mechanisms – how this happened
Firm level performance (productivity, innovation, internationalisation, quality etc.)
Balancing delivery priorities with evaluation demands
Control groups – can be hard to find comparable groups
Understanding cluster maturity – things take time to happen
Setting appropriate goals and relevant indicators of progress and success?
In depth evaluation takes investment
Self assessment/reporting or independent review
Balancing quantitative and qualitative
Data collection
Causality
When is a good time to evaluate too soon - not enough results, too late attribution issues
Traps and difficulties
International peer review
Yearly visits and dialogue meetings
Triangulating approaches
Discriminant analysis, CGE model
Interviews and participatory approaches encourage engagement
Hard data on soft issues – e.g. increased engagement also measure #companies engaged; #SMEs; # research nodes engaged etc.
Case studies and “stories of change”
What new approaches have worked well?
Cluster mapping, statistical and economic analysis
Measure benefits for each kind of stakeholder: companies, funders governments, academic institutions
Governance – how effective is the cluster organisation
satisfaction, image
16
The thing that makes a cluster different is the building of trust and relationships that means the group goes from just being a collection to building deeper levels of collaboration and doing things together that they could not do individually. “We can do new things together – we can only do these things together”
How do we factor in the Human Element into Cluster Evaluations?
Question...
Understanding the importance of
What new approaches have worked well?
Email traffic between cluster organisations
Evidence of growth in partnerships (between companies, company to university; with companies in different sector/market etc)
Cluster dynamics model
The partnership journey – what is the evidence of change from collection to cluster
Approaches
Communication
Collection
Tangible benefits of clustering e.g. Has the collaboration led to new/different services, attracted new customers, led to new partnerships etc.
Is there evidence of change in behaviour/attitudes
Social network analysis
Right: boards designed
for the second workshop
17
“ Rhône-Alpes
The ongoing evaluation already shows where the human factor is a weight on the cluster activity”
It’s quite difficult to measure trust, or evidence changing behaviours, but it has value alongside the economic benefit – it is quantifying it that is difficult.
Jan Messing
Understanding how best to do this is fundamental
Objective of cluster is to get interaction working, catalysing the actors to get things working
How do you capture building trust and social capital within a cluster?
It is a question about change – in understanding, mindset, in relations internal and external”
“
There is a general acceptance that social capital and trust is a critical element for effective cluster development. This is a very important part of clustering, but one that is very poorly captured in evaluation. Collaboration
Co-ordination
Co-operation
Sharing indicators / visual is useful to show progress
Can we use leadership literature to understand the role of boundary spanners etc?
Balancing time spent capturing the data with the value of that data
Define description and levels of progress better – then self assessment – where are you on this scale? As trust develops, what would you expect to see?
Maintaining neutrality– engagement and understanding as an evaluator vs independence
Cluster dynamics (and other participatory methods) too “bulky” – develop further for quick easy self assessments
Traps and difficulties
Time invested by cluster participants
Connecting connectors – boundary spanners
Capturing catalytic moments, unique stories, anecdotes and quotes
facilitation and investing in that role
18
How do we disseminate and evidence the value of clusters and communicate this eectively to our partners, potential cluster members and most importantly to our funders. If we can put across real arguments as to the value of clustering this can help support further investment.
How do we evidence and communicate the Critical Success Factors in Clusters?
Question...
for the second workshop
New strong R&I nodes engaged
New tools for collaboration
MNEs engaged through innovation nodes
SMEs engaged through innovation nodes
New products and services
Call for EU-tenders appiied
Call for EU-tenders won
Understanding and reporting impact and importance of
Target 100% of goal
200%
Highlights from StarDust project results
Agreement on clarity / trajectory, direction of travel
Leadership and vision (compelling) and then showing progress
What new approaches have worked well?
Approaches
Right: boards designed
19
Elizabeth Redman
The starting point of any cluster evaluation should be to understanding the audience....and what decisions or outcomes you are trying to influence”
“
Vinnova
Communicating results related to goals is effective. The difficult part is establishing relevant goals /expectations.”
“
Direct discussion and sharing with policy makers and cluster practitioner
Publishing and conferences to share approaches and results
Describing good practice and the process/decisions that gave the best results
Image and reputation – has the cluster helped?
Showcasing the clusters as an attraction to region – a hub, giving access to resources (money and talent) and with limited risk
Horses mouth is very powerful i.e. company to company
Combine anecdotal and hard evidence
Using concrete indicators to show progress against goals
How have you disseminated and communicated results to your key audiences?
Understanding the external context – a flat performance in a declining sector could be a success or smaller workforce but more highly skilled
Cluster policies only one element in an innovation landscape.
Policy makers want “an answer”, preferably an “impact figure” to justify spend and investment
Role of leadership and drive in a cluster is important – how do you assess properly?
Still difficult to explain the process and show how cluster organisation led to the results
technoloplis
Cluster policy is not a homogeneous block but includes a variety of dynamics”
“
Traps and difficulties
context and conditions (.e.g. in country/region) on the results achieved
20
5 Designing new ways to engage: the cluster evaluation board game
Developed by InDI researchers for the TCI working group meeting in Belfast in April 2014, this game was designed to extract high quality information from a diverse group of experts in a rapid and engaging way. The meeting in Belfast involved twenty-five participants from eleven different countries and regions across Europe bringing diverse and deep practical expertise on this topic. A key challenge was how to use limited time to garner that experience, in a way that could be easily sharable. 
The ‘rules’ The questions used in the game were informed by the initial discussion in the workshop, and the activity delivered a fun and energetic form of focused brainstorming. Broad rules were put in place. Three games ran in parallel, with two teams on each. The aim of the game was to ‘reach success’, and teams could Poland:
decide to move forward or move the other team
‘...it gives a bigger
back. On landing on a space the team had two
picture, a broader
minutes to answer the question. There were also
perspective, which is
a few wild card questions to keep participants on
very useful.’
their toes.
21
The use of this game proved hugely beneficial in quickly drawing out and capturing the joint expertise gathered in the meeting. The activity generated over forty flipchart pages of answers to specific questions. By using a blank game the questions could be made more specific and bespoke to the event underway. In evaluation afterwards, the game was rated very highly as an excellent tool to release and capture expertise in a fun and engaging way. It generated some very successful outputs for the design researchers because it was physical and tangible, but also because the playful nature helped energise the process. The collective expertise gathered through the game is captured as part of the FAQ section in this booklet.
22
23
6 Hot topics: targets A tale of indicators and owls
There is often a strong pressure, particularly from funders, to set targets for a cluster to achieve. The working group discussed this at length, and agreed that they can be useful to show tangible progress, and to give comfort to funders. However, targets must reflect overall goals and objectives therefore care must be taken to identify the right targets to drive the right behaviours. The owl example helped illustrate this. Imagine you are in charge of a forest, and your overall goal and objective is to create a strong ecosystem within that forest. A good indicator of the health of the ecosystem is the number of owls within the forest. Owls are at the top of the food chain. They eat the rodents, who eat the insects, who live within the fallen leaves and debris on the forest floor. So, if the owls are healthy, this indicates that all those elements are working well and the forest ecosystem is strong. However, if the number of owls becomes a target and that becomes the driver to success, it can encourage the wrong behaviours. For example, additional owls may be brought in externally. The debris might be cleared from the forest floor to make it easier for owls to catch their prey.
24
New food sources might be added. All of these in the short term may help owl numbers, but in the longer term will distort and weaken the ecosystem – the opposite of the overall objective and goal. Thus owls are a really good indicator, but a lousy target. We must be careful when setting our targets that we do not lose sight of our objectives.
25
7 Reflections and next steps
The first year of activity for the Cluster Evaluation Working Group has really made progress in sharing expertise and starting to develop new approaches. As well as the main group workshops, a few mini project ideas have been generated and those will be taken forward by members of the group, for example, how can we better capture the ‘human element’ of clustering? There is potential for further meetings, but the key focus is currently to collate the outputs from the working group and share that learning. An online area for the working group has been set up in new TCI website to share activity (including the banners produced during the Belfast workshop), and other ways to continue the discussion, for example, webinars on specific topics, are being explored.
The role of design At InDI we continue to be interested in researching the role of design in clusters, in building complex collaborations, and evaluating those intangible benefits. We have also successfully used design to help elicit the depth of knowledge and expertise across this TCI working group, helping to to bring knowledge
26
together to share with other cluster practitioners. This is a fertile area for further investigation.
Taking it forward As Christian Ketels, TCI President wrote recently, ‘Increasingly, we seem to be on the cusp of a real breakthrough in this area. TCI can and should play its role in facilitating this process.’ As ever, TCI is most successful when members take forward areas that are really important to them, so we look forward to many more projects and conversations, both as formal meetings of the working group, and as important activity driven by members priorities.
South Africa: ‘I think this is still the most important TCI nut to be cracked’ —Nigel Gwynn Evans
27
Appendix A FAQs
These questions were identified by the working group as important issues to consider when designing a cluster evaluation. Through the workshop this group of experts generated some informed answers, to help inform your evaluation planning.
Q1 – How can we develop and share a TCI ‘fruit
salad’ of current good practice and techniques in cluster evaluation?
1. What should you ask regional funders in an interview What are your three main expectations for the cluster? What are your expected deliverables, and any timescales for achieving these? How does the cluster fit with wider strategies and policies? 2. How would you benchmark clusters Use similar sectors or similar individual portfolios, at a similar development stage (although you can learn from those further ahead) Benchmark against best in class, and using
tools like cluster observatory, cluster collaboration platform
28
Benchmark against not just current stage but also aspirations (whilst remaining realistic) 3. How would you capture additionality (and why is it important) Use comparison/control groups counterfactual Use a baseline case – and then show what is different from business as usual Storytelling – what you’re getting in addition, e.g. enhanced capability by working together 4. Who should be included in a cluster survey All cluster members - companies, academia, relevant public sector associations Policy makers and funders Companies from the supply chain Stakeholders from committee Facilitator Other cluster organisations in the region Peer review similar clusters in similar sector 5. How would you capture firm level performance? Standard data on firm performance and softer data (through survey) from firms Hard data – on productivity, R&D, employment Export trends level and trend over time Examples of how they innovate What makes a good case study Open and honest and succinct
29
Shows steps on journey (start and progress from/to) and decision process Shows impact and critical success factors and Onward strategies Personal – pictures, videos, testimonials,
verbal quotes
Q2 – How do we factor in the human element
into cluster evaluations
1. What would you see in a cluster with very good social capital Joint projects and initiatives and investments Trust between stakeholders i.e. willing to rely on, take risk with, believe in A lot of communication – daily interaction, Good networking (informal as well as structured) Sharing problems and working together to solve Sharing resources e.g. human capital e.g. lobbying e.g. IP e.g. learning and skills Collaboration both between and beyond
30
the cluster
2. What would you expect to see in a good ‘boundary spanner’ Outgoing and proactive in engaging wide groups in different organisations/geographies Seeking out opportunities and open to new ideas and change Credibility and legitimacy and ability to
stay neutral Broad knowledge of different organisations and culturally aware Not just in it for themselves
3. How would you evidence regional leadership Consistent political support Co. financing and investment of time Participating in steering board Ambassador outside – e.g. communicate regional opportunities to national government Mentioned in strategic docs Consultation with clusters when making policy Help build new linkages
31
4. What are the good/ bad things about
self assessment Good: — Cost efficiency — Easy (sometimes only feasible approach) — Honest — Learning/involvement of most informed Stakeholders — Starting point for other techniques — Could visualise the internal discussion Bad: — Lack of objectivity (perceived bias) — Often more qualitative – (perceived lack of accuracy) — Influenced by own agenda — Pick out the things that show results in good light — Not challenged on perspective – internal view
5. How would you evidence an increase in ‘linkages’ (i.e more collaborative behaviour) People involved in meetings and who from an organisation Types of collaborative projects changing to more in depth Evidence of collaboration – behaviours (before and after) Collaboration space
32
Joint venture – partners involved Formal analysis e.g. SNA (social network analysis) 6. Outline the stages/ levels you might see to describe increasing (deeper) collaboration behaviour Start/emerging Deciding and investment Maturity – function well/collaborate well, strong social capital Reinvention – cluster can fund itself Exploring new fields and activities – cluster to cluster collaboration Developing new strategy – survive through crisis 7. Draw three ways you usually present progress Presenting progress (rockets/chart etc) Summarise key messages for regional stakeholders Show an example of success/possible future What needs to be done and responsibility for progress 8. Describe some critical ‘human element’ roles that might be important for a cluster Leadership (cluster manager or initiative leader) Management (cluster organization/process support team)
33
Regional backing Engagement (of companies, knowledge institutions and other relevant actors) (Internal) Collaboration and how this develops to deeper trust (External) Interaction/linkages, including transnational and cross sectoral linkages
Q3 - How do we evidence and communicate the
critical success factors in clusters?
1. What are the key messages for regional stakeholders What’s in it for them? New perspectives for development and new investment opportunities Renewal potential for the future - visionary/ future context messages Attraction for region to new companies and talent Access to people you want to influence Look at clusters as high performance innovation systems Cluster map – look at regions strengths/ weaknesses Communicate both success and failures – good/ bad reliable story
34
2. How would you factor in the external content in an evaluation Understanding current marketplace – look at sector context, locally, nationally, internationally Policy – mix/change (e.g. election) Benchmark within country/outside other regions Direct effects and indirect issues/challenges Compare with a control group Time series – multi method story with different controls Pestle analysis and other tools (political, economical, social, technology, legislation, environmental). 3. What are the key messages for companies The benefits of working in a cluster including Improve products Market place access and market intelligence New knowledge and abilities to innovate Improving firm performance, cost reduction and increased profit by working together Attraction – credibility, reputation and recognition of markets Influence policy Access to talent and skills and shared workforce Access to funding Ability to fill gaps in own capability New and enhanced skills New thinking and new perspectives (open eyes)
35
Value of collaboration and being many instead of one 4. How can company stories help Show good examples of benefits Provide real evidence and encouragement to others Good marketing and pride/recognition and testimonials Better understanding – feedback to cluster org and policy Outlines the expected journey – high/low/ emotions Shows what works well/doesn’t (learning) 5. How would you set cluster goals Understanding what cluster members deem to be successful Setting key objectives and a realistic workplan What are the critical success factors and the deal breakers Ensure shared vision, talk to stakeholders and align with policy goals Innovation goals – new products, new services, renewal of industry, new connections, start ups Understanding goals and interim goals, including timings/expectation Have a range of goals, finance, human etc and balance quantitative and qualitative goals
36
System Impact Clear, measurable, SMART (not just activities, also output, outcome, impact) Involves everyone who is key to success? Balance cluster needs and cluster demands 6. How can clusters help the image/ reputation of a region/ sector Show strength of a region Demonstrate evidence of collaboration and its value Examples of new joint products which are relevant globally Demonstrate diversity and long term thinking (and investment) Develop trademark to be respected locally and regionally Packaged and communicate success stories Promote/appoint best innovation award 7. Describe the role of a good facilitator in a cluster Encourages participation Manage conflict and achieves consensus Drives strategy process and managing project Commercial focus Fundraiser Opens doors / boundary spanner Good listener
37
Visionary / horizon scanning Energetic/energise Power plant on two legs 8. What is ‘unique’ about clusters (compared to other innovation/ sector interventions) Bringing together organisations that may have been competitors Draw together number of factors/functions on one/neutral platform Intersection – between region/sector policy Boundary spanning between sectors Bridge building between firms/research smallsmall, small-large Provide forced and un-bureaucratic money
38
seed funding
39
40
41
42