Thursday January 21, 2010
Vol. 95, Issue 61
THE
DAILY
w w w. T h e D a i l y A z t e c . c o m
AZTEC
Tw i t t e r : T h e D a i l y A z t e c
San Diego State University’s Independent Student Newspaper since 1913
I N S I D E T O D AY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Anatomy of a tuition dollar 1 cent Library Service Fee
1 cent
COLLEGE GADGETS
Student Government Association Fee (student government, athletics, cultural programs)
Learn about all the gadgets that help you survive and get out of bed in time for 8 a.m. classes.
6 cents
page 3
Student Union Fee (financing, construction and operation of Aztec Center)
OPINION
81 cents State University Fee (used for non-instructional purposes only, such as counseling, testing, administration)
SENATE SEAT FLIPS Special election led to GOP victory in Mass.; Democrats scramble to explain why. page 7
SPORTS
PAINT DOMINANCE Find out how the Aztecs took on Utah’s big men on Tuesday night in Salt Lake City. page 8
SATURDAY @ SDSU SDSU Men’s Basketball v. BYU
7 cents
7 p.m.,Viejas Arena
Instructionally Related Activity (IRA) Fee (athletics, marching band, art exhibits)
The Aztecs will take on MWC leader BYU at home. Fans are encouraged to wear black and get tickets early because a sellout is expected.
3 cents Health Services Fee (health services and promotion)
1 cent Health Facility Fee (leasing and construction of Student Health Services building)
For more of today’s headlines, visit:
www.thedailyaztec.com
CONTACT
The graphic represents full-time students with 6.1 units or more. Values are rounded. The total amount of full-time tuition for Spring 2010 is $2,496, up from $1,877 in 2009.
GENERAL INFORMATION 619.594.4199
EDITOR
IN CHIEF, FARYAR BORHANI 619.594.4190 EDITOR@THEDAILYAZTEC .COM
CITY EDITOR, WHITNEY LAWRENCE 619.594.7781 CITYEDITOR@THEDAILYAZTEC .COM
FEATURES EDITOR, NICOLE CALLAS 619.594.6976 FEATURE@THEDAILYAZTEC .COM
SPORTS EDITOR, EDWARD LEWIS 619.594.7817 SPORTS@THEDAILYAZTEC .COM
OPINION, ALLAN ACEVEDO 619.594.0509 OPINION@THEDAILYAZTEC .COM
TEMPO EDITOR, ALLIE DAUGHERTY 619.594.6968 TEMPO@THEDAILYAZTEC .COM
Oil tax may fuel CSU’s future The bill is on its way to the Senate, but not without opposition S A R A H K O VA S H S E N I O R S TA F F W R I T E R
ART DIRECTOR, ELENA BERRIDY 619.594.6979 ARTDIRECTOR@THEDAILYAZTEC .COM
PHOTO EDITOR, GLENN CONNELLY 619.594.7279 PHOTO@THEDAILYAZTEC .COM
WEB EDITOR, MYLENE ERPELO 619.594.3315 WEB@THEDAILYAZTEC .COM
ADVERTISING 619.594.6977
INDEX SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY.........................................3 OPINION...........................................................................7 SPORTS.............................................................................8 TEMPO...........................................................................11 CLASSIFIEDS..................................................................15 THE BACK PAGE.........................................................16
Assembly Bill 656, created to raise money for higher education, passed the state assembly Revenue and Taxation board committee by three votes yesterday. AB 656 went to committee in the afternoon on January 11. It was the second hearing since July, when it passed through the Assembly Higher Education committee. The bill, referred to as “Fair share for fair tuition,” authored by Assembly Majority Leader Alberto Torrico, could potentially generate money for higher education from a
tax imposed on big oil companies. The bill indicates that 50 percent of the money generated will go to the California State University system and the other 50 percent will go to the University of California system and community colleges. “The status quo of budget cuts and fee hikes are devastating to the once-great reputation of our public universities,” Torrico said in a press release earlier this month. “Thousands of students are turned away, students can’t get access to the classes they need to graduate and professors are furloughed. We can’t afford to slash university budgets when studies show the need for college educated workers is outpacing the state’s ability to produce them.” According to Torrico, many oil company employees came to the hearing to oppose the bill, citing their fear of job risk, in what he
called, “very powerful testimony.” However, that fear could not be farther from the truth, Torrico said.
The bill, referred to as “Fair share for fair tuition,” ... could potentially generate money for higher education from a tax imposed on big oil companies. Brian Nestande was one of the two committee members who voted against AB 656, and according to his chief of staff, Rob Flanigan, Nestande’s reasons include preventing the loss of jobs in the oil
industry and increases in taxes. “Now is the worst time to increase taxes and destroy jobs,” Flanigan said. He added that Nestande doesn’t want to take anything away from education, but budget restructuring is necessary. After passing through the committee, Torrico is optimistic about the future of the bill. “I feel very good about it,” Torrico said. He attributes its success thus far to more than 50,000 supporters, a “grassroots” support. Now that AB 656 has passed through the committee, Torrico said he is hopeful that the bill will reach the California Senate in the next two to three weeks. If the bill is successful in the state Senate, it is expected to be put into effect this summer in August or September in time for the next academic year.