Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Vol. 95, Issue 75
THE
DAILY
w w w. T h e D a i l y A z t e c . c o m
AZTEC
Tw i t t e r : T h e D a i l y A z t e c
San Diego State University’s Independent Student Newspaper since 1913
I N S I D E T O D AY OPINION
New athletic director hired
HEALTH CARE Republicans should work toward a health care solution rather than complain about it. page 2
TRAVEL & ADVENTURE
MARDI GRAS Find out where to go in San Diego for this year’s wild and colorful Mardi Gras festivities. page 4
SPORTS see SPOR T S on page 5
FRIDAY NIGHT ACE Find out which SDSU pitcher will start Friday nights for the Aztecs this season. page 6
TODAY @ SDSU Film screening 7 p.m., Cross-Cultural Center The Africana Studies Department is hosting educational and social events for Black History Month. “American Violet” will be screened today. For more of today’s headlines, visit:
www.thedailyaztec.com
CONTACT GENERAL INFORMATION 619.594.4199
EDITOR
IN CHIEF, FARYAR BORHANI 619.594.4190 EDITOR@THEDAILYAZTEC .COM
CITY EDITOR, WHITNEY LAWRENCE 619.594.7781 CITYEDITOR@THEDAILYAZTEC .COM
FEATURES EDITOR, NICOLE CALLAS 619.594.6976 FEATURE@THEDAILYAZTEC .COM
SPORTS EDITOR, EDWARD LEWIS 619.594.7817 SPORTS@THEDAILYAZTEC .COM
OPINION, ALLAN ACEVEDO 619.594.0509 OPINION@THEDAILYAZTEC .COM
TEMPO EDITOR, ALLIE DAUGHERTY 619.594.6968 TEMPO@THEDAILYAZTEC .COM
ART DIRECTOR, ELENA BERRIDY 619.594.6979 ARTDIRECTOR@THEDAILYAZTEC .COM
PHOTO EDITOR, GLENN CONNELLY 619.594.7279 PHOTO@THEDAILYAZTEC .COM
WEB EDITOR, MYLENE ERPELO 619.594.3315 WEB@THEDAILYAZTEC .COM
ADVERTISING 619.594.6977
INDEX OPINION.........................................................................2 TRAVEL & ADVENTURE...............................................4 SPORTS.............................................................................6 CLASSIFIEDS....................................................................7 THE BACK PAGE............................................................8
Glenn Connelly / Photo Editor
Student trustee Red tape delays position to open work, some say R E E M NO U R S E N I O R S TA F F W R I T E R
A student representative position will be opening in July on the California State University Board of Trustees. The board is responsible for the oversight of the rules, regulations and policies governing the CSU system. The CSU Board of Trustees establishes policies concerning student fees, admissions criteria, financial aid, student housing, parking and other areas that directly impact students. “Serving as a student trustee presents a unique opportunity to shape higher education policy for one of the largest systems of higher education in the world; it is the highest and most powerful office a student can hold within the CSU,” according to the California State Student Association Web site. San Diego State student and California State Student Association Vice President of Finance, Alyssa Bruni, said her experience in the CSSA has been rewarding and worthwhile. She encourages interested students to apply for the student trustee position. “Your voice, which is ultimately the voice of 450,000 students, will be voiced and heard,” Bruni said. “Getting involved in the shared governing structure of the CSU and voicing the students’ opinions is a great opportunity,” she said. “We have participated in ambitious policy agendas and set some really high goals that we can achieve,” Bruni said. “We’ve really had a monumental year and there’s a lot that we’ve done and still a lot more we can accomplish.” The primary responsibility of students who serve on the CSU Board of Trustees is to serve as the voice of the CSU students and represent their collective demands and requests, Sarah Vagts, CSSA director
of university affairs, said. Bruni agreed with Vagts that students’ issues should be the main focus of any student trustee. “One hundred and 20 percent you are the voice of the students and that’s the only thing that matters,” Bruni said. “That’s the only thing you should care about!” In addition, student trustees are required to attend all regularly scheduled and special meetings of CSU Board of Trustees held at the CSU Office of the Chancellor in Long Beach, attend the CSSA meetings held every month, advocate action for issues on behalf of CSU students and work with other student leaders across campuses to resolve student issues. Candidates must attain at least junior class standing by July 1, be continuously enrolled as an undergraduate or graduate student until June 30, 2012 and be in good academic standing with at least a 2.0 GPA. Vagts said candidates should also demonstrate quality communication skills, acknowledge the political environment in the state, be passionate about advocacy and be diplomatic. The student trustee is a two-year term position, with a voting position in the second year only. Applications for the position are due no later than 5 p.m. on Friday, April 9. Information on how to apply and where to send the application is available on the CSSA Web site, at www.csustudents.org. The Initial Review Board, a body elected from the CSSA Board, will screen applications to meet the minimum requirements. Candidates will be notified of acceptance by April 27 and their applications will be forwarded to an interview panel, of which two to five finalists will be determined and interviewed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger for the final decision.
S A R A H K O VA S H S E N I O R S TA F F W R I T E R
During the busiest months for graduate affairs, some are questioning the use of the Institutional Review Board and its role in research at San Diego State. Graduate and Research Affairs at SDSU receives the highest volume of research proposals in February and March, as graduate students are hurrying to finish their graduation requirements in the spring. The IRB consists of faculty and community members who review research proposals with the ultimate goal of protecting human research subjects. However, amidst the shuffle of research proposals, the IRB is felt by some to stand as a roadblock in beginning research. “I think there’s a lot of important things about the IRB,” Toby Hopp, a journalism graduate student said. “It prevents any sort of abuses … one of the problems is that it is a bureaucratic type of institution so it delays things and in some cases unnecessarily.” Hopp, who is working on his thesis, had to spend approximately 20 hours arranging his research proposal for the IRB and had to wait for approval before starting his research, which consists of surveying individuals to find out what blogs they read and for what reasons. “There’s very little harm that I think can be done to them by answering these questions,” Hopp said. Instances such as Hopp’s raise the idea that the IRB might be creating unnecessary hurdles with excess bureaucracy. According to Camille Nebeker, director of the Division of Research Affairs, because SDSU is federally funded, the university
has to have an IRB to review research and protect the rights of research participants. “It can be bureaucratic because it is driven by federal regulations and we try very hard here to not be bureaucratic and regulatory,” Nebeker said. “It’s more of a ‘how can we help you do your science and be of service and help you design a study that is ethically sound and take into account these ethical principles of the Belmont Report?’” The Belmont Report is a guideline for ethics in research developed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which largely affects the institution of the IRB. Although the IRB is noted for its participation in protecting human subjects and the integrity of research conducted, one professor still feels that the IRB has overextended its role. Dr. David Dozier, professor of communication and public relations at SDSU cites one instance when his research, consisting of surveying homeowners who had taken measures to protect themselves against wildfires, was halted by the IRB because of a typographical error in his survey. “My reaction was, ‘Where in the world did you become the research police and why does my typographical error have anything to do with protecting human subjects?’” Dozier said. He uses this reference to indicate that the IRB’s red tape has become “increasingly ponderous” and has little to do with protecting human rights. Although Dozier disagrees with some of the IRB’s methods, he acknowledges its efforts saying, “This isn’t a critique of the people that actually do the work, they’re trying to do a job.”