Reasons not to buy the iPad mini P7
THE NEWSPAPER OF SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY SINCE 1913 VOLUME 99, ISSUE 40
MONDAY, NOVERMBER 5, 2012
Aztecs tame Broncos in nail-biter football
Hilal Haider Staff Writer
Upset alert! Last Saturday, San Diego State continued its hot winning streak in Boise, Idaho against the equally sweltering 7-1 Broncos for one of the most important games of the season. The Aztecs are now 5-1 in Mountain West Conference play, while the Broncos are now 4-1. Interestingly enough, both teams will be moving on to the Big East conference next season, so this could evolve into a heated rivalry in the coming years. The significance of Saturday’s game was evident as the Broncos came into action riding a sevengame winning streak and possibly looking ahead to a Bowl Championship Series game. However, the fighting Aztecs stood in Boise’s way, with their potent running game and sophomore rookie quarterback Adam Dingwell. The game launched with a thrilling opening kickoff return for a touchdown. Junior wide receiver Colin Lockett returned his second kickoff for a touchdown this year, which gave the Aztecs an instant 7-0 lead to play with. On an ensuing drive for the Broncos, they converted against the Aztec defense on a crucial fourth down. They later punched it into the end zone behind redshirt senior running back D.J. Harper and failed on the two-point conversion to make the score 7-6 in favor of the Aztecs.
photo editor paige nelson
Sophomore quaterback Adam Dingwell prepares to launch the ball to an SDSU reciever. SDSU has now won five consecutive games after it defeated Boise State on Saturday.
The game proceeded and the Aztecs continued to fight. Dingwell showed great poise in the pocket, as he converted on multiple third downs to keep the SDSU drives alive. With the Broncos front seven penetrating most of the SDSU running plays, the Aztecs were forced to rely on Dingwell. The Aztecs defense played strong throughout, but were tricked by a fake reverse touchdown run by Harper to put the Broncos on top. Heading into the half, SDSU trailed 13-7, but remained in striking distance of the Broncos. “First half we were moving the ball well. We were getting
some yards whether it was on the ground or through the air, and we just kept shooting ourselves in the foot whether with penalties or myself making a bad read or something,” Dingwell said. Boise State received the ball first in the second half and on the first offensive play redshirt junior quarterback Joe Southwick was forced into a bad throw that was picked off by safety and leading tackler, junior defensive back Nat Berhe. SDSU, however, could not capitalize, as senior kicker Chance Marden did not connect on a chip-shot field goal. On the next possession, the SDSU defense held the Broncos to
three-and-out and then blocked the fourth-down punt. The offense set up beautifully and proceeded to punch it in for six behind sophomore running back Adam Muema. The Aztecs regained the lead 14-13. After a back and forth third quarter, the Aztecs found themselves driving down the blue turf with a surge. With the help of a trademark Muema run and a pass interference penalty against Boise, SDSU got first and goal from the seven-yard line. On a fourth and goal, SDSU head coach Rocky Long told the offense to stay on the field, and they converted with a 1-yard touchdown run, by senior running back Walter Kazee. The Bronco offense marched right back down the field and crossed the goal line to cut the lead to 21-19. Boise State attempted the two-point conversion for the tie, but did not succeed yet again, as Southwick’s pass was intercepted by junior defensive back Rene Siluano to deny the conversion. The score remained 21-19 in favor of the visiting Aztecs, with approximately five minutes remaining in the game. The Aztecs received the ball with one goal in mind: To run the clock out and convert a couple of first downs to ice the game. They followed their running backs, Muema and Kazee and converted on a crucial fourth down to ice the game and snag a rare victory in Boise. “The second half, we just said the first half is behind us and
Heather Rushall Senior Staff Columnist
P
DEBATE continued on page 2
SDSU-IV continued on page 2
PROP 33 continued on page 3
Michele Pluss Staff Writer
antonio zaragoza , editor in chief
Representatives of Aztecs for Obama (left) and representatives of College Republicans engage in a debate about the upcoming election. The representatives brought up issues that will affect students to get the young voters informed before they vote.
As part of the “Rock the Vote” event series sponsored by Associated Students, San Diego State student activists held a debate on campus Wednesday afternoon to inform students about relevant issues affecting the student population as well as the country as a whole. Representatives from the SDSU debate team, Aztecs for Obama and College Republi-
election
Gerad, stood by the Obama campaign and challenged the Republicans to show why their candidate was a better contender. “We’re supporting greater choice, greater accountability, greater ability for you as consumers, as students and as people who actually have the services and have access and control over these things. Ultimately you can look to the records of governors like Mitch Daniels in Indiana and other people
local
cans debated about health care, the debt crisis and education. “We as young people are being valued. Our dreams are not to be deferred and the country and the President of the United States, President Barack Obama, has sought to it to make sure our dreams are truly invested in and are heard too,” Aztecs for Obama representative Ronnie Landfair said about education in the U.S. Landfair and fellow Aztecs for Obama representative Jenoy
Prop 33: insurance deception
Tensions between faculty and administration continue to run high at the San Diego State-Imperial Valley campus following a no-confidence vote issued early last month against Dean David Pearson. Senate Chair Bill Eadie was part of the team exploring the faculty’s concerns. “Usually (a vote of no confidence) is a last resort measure that is used when you tried to work out problems with administrators and it’s proven to be uncooperative,” Eaddie said. Issued on Oct. 3, the no-confidence vote was submitted along with a statement endorsed by SDSU-IV faculty, which raised allegations of intimidation and retribution against the dean. “Our primary concern is that we do not appear to have the leadership in place to enable SDSU-IV to emerge from this turmoil (of the cur-
FOOTBALL continued on page 4
arise at SDSU-IV
campus
Staff Writer
Our nation loves binaries ... Save for this presidentail election, choice isn’t usually black or white.
roposition 33 is a ballot initiative asking California voters to approve a new discount for drivers who have maintained consistent auto insurance coverage for at least five years. The so-called persistency discount would be given on a proportional basis, meaning the longer the driver has been insured, the higher the discount. In 1988, Proposition 103 was passed requiring auto insurance companies to determine the cost of insurance policies based on the driver’s safety record, the annual number of miles driven and the amount of years the driver has been driving, in that order. The law also prohibits insurers from offering discounts to customers who switch from one company to another. Proposition 33 offers persistency discounts to drivers regardless of which company they’ve insured with, allowing customers to maintain the discount even if they switch companies. With current regulations, drivers forfeit any discounts they were receiving from the previous insurer when they switch companies. On the flip side, drivers who have never been insured, who have let an insurance policy lapse for more than 90 days or drivers who were not insured for more than 18 months in the last five years because of job loss (resulting from lay off or furlough) will have to pay higher insurance rates. This includes college students who have never driven or owned a car and drivers who have been unable to drive because of illness or injury. It does not include children living with a parent who are on a parent’s insurance policy or active military on deployment. The anticipated fiscal impact of the proposition isn’t expected to be significant. Although auto insurance agencies pay a premium tax to the state, the discounts
Aztecs rock election debate Concerns
Stephanie Saccente
BACKPAGE STORY