Feb. 13, 2020 THURSDAY
Issue No. 5 csceagle.com
the
Eagle
The voice of Chadron State College since 1920
100 Eagle the
Y E A R S
Semper veritas
1920 – 2020
Ag & Range >>
DRONE DISCUSSIONS PART THREE Pros and cons of drones in agriculture Please see page 11
NEWS >>
CAB APPROVES REVISED BYLAWS Senate revision committee to review approved changes Please see page 3
Photo by Brandon Davenport
WRESTLER’S FINAL HOME DUAL - CSC wrestlers show frustration with the referree during their final home appearance of the season, Thursday, Feb. 6 at the Chicoine Center.
SPORTS >>
Feds deny CSC’s summary judgment request in ‘16 rape case
CSC SOFTBALL TEAM PREPARES FOR 2020 Eagles go 3-3 during a threeday pre-season tournament in Lubbock, Texas. Please see page 12
INDEX News
2
Opinion
5
Lifestyles
7
Ag & Range
11
Sports
12
Judge calls college’s response to the situation ‘not reasonable’ u By Brandon Davenport Editor
A federal judge ruled Friday that a jury trial will go forward in the case of a lawsuit filed by an unnamed former Chadron State College student against the Nebraska State College System in con-
nection to a 2016 report of rape on campus. Judge Joseph F. Bataillon, said Friday that evidence exists that CSC “responded with deliberate indifference,” in reaction to the reported rape. Bataillon was ruling on a motion for a summary judgment put forward by the NSCS. According to Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute, summary judgment procedure is a method for promptly disposing of actions in which there is no genuine issue as to any material fact. In order for a summary judgment to succeed, the motioning party must show that there is no dispute as to the facts of the case and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The judge must determine if a reasonable jury could rule in favor of either party. If the judge determines a reasonable jury could only rule in one way, a summary judgment
can be granted. If not, the case moves to a jury trial. According to court documents, “on a motion for summary judgment, facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Credibility determinations, the weighing of evidence, and the drawing of legitimate inferences from the evidence are jury functions, not those of a judge.” Friday’s decision found the college’s investigation of the credible reports of sexual assault could be viewed as cursory and that “a reasonable juror could find that the college understated or trivialized the seriousness of the conduct.” Bataillon’s determination goes on to state “given the information known to the college, there is evidence that would support a conclusion that the college’s response to the situation was not reasonable.”
Please see TRIAL, page 2