Tuesday February 14 2012 | Week 4
Edinburgh's Anatomical Museum SCIENCE & ENVIRONMENT »
P24
P16
T H E U K ' S O LD E S T S T U D EN T N EW S PA P ER
S cott ish S t udent Ne wspaper of the Year 2010
S I N C E 1887
FILM »
The ongoing battle between 3D and IMAX
The number of memes is too damn high! Facebook page goes viral within hours>> News P5
Candidates won’t campaign as Defend Edinburgh Referendum results mean election candidates will not be able to run as a group
Alasdair Drennan & Mia FlorinSefton DEFEND EDINBURGH will be unable to campaign at this year’s EUSA General Election, following the online referendum held last week. Defend Edinburgh is a group of campaigners for free education that have run together in the last two EUSA elections. Other outcomes from Edinburgh University Students’ Association’s (EUSA) first online referendum mean that SABMiller products will be banned from sale in all EUSA outlets, and EUSA policy is now to work towards the introduction of a living wage for all EUSA staff. The referendum also demonstrated support from the student body for the
01_FRONTPAGE(1)[1].indd 1
introduction of a free Easter Bush bus campaign and the strategy for improving accommodation introduced by new rector Peter McColl. Motions not carried included introducing quotas for the election of female delegates to the National Union of Students (NUS) and a motion to allow EUSA sabbatical officers to stand for re-election. Motions which could have a financial impact on EUSA will also have to be passed by the board of trustees before becoming the policy of the association. There were some initial difficulties with the voting but these were resolved. Andrew Burnie, Undergraduate Representative for the School of Informatics told The Student, “I don’t believe results will be affected and I’m sure things will be much more clear from the start in future referenda.” He also hoped that the success of the election this year would yield better results next year. He said, “Now people have seen how this works I’m really hopeful we’ll get even more questions from outside
of those already elected in EUSA.” Matt McPherson, EUSA President, told The Student that the referendum had been a great success. He said, “Our turnout was really good. This was a huge achievement for Edinburgh and is an exciting new chapter in our democracy.”
“
This was a huge achievement for Edinburgh and is an exciting new chapter in our democracy” Matt McPherson, EUSA President McPherson also acknowledged that there was a lot to learn from the referendum and that there would be changes made next year. He said, “The Campaigns and Accountability forum, which isn’t up and running yet, will play a much more proactive role in overlooking the questions that come to the student body.
“This will make them much more tailored, much more appropriate and much more clear but for a first start it was fantastic and I’m very pleased.” The passing of question 10 (“Should candidates in EUSA elections be banned from running in a group, under a common name with collective publicity designs and sharing funding?”) will prevent students in the up-coming elections running as a group claiming shared values and under a shared name; commonly known as a ‘slate.’ This will have a direct impact on the Edinburgh University Students’ Association general elections taking place at the end of March. Gabi Jones, member of the EUSA Student Council, proposed the question and told The Student, “This question was preemptive more than anything. I’d heard talk about people setting up rival slates to try and emulate the success of Defend Edinburgh, and I just did not want to see EUSA go down that path. “It’s off-putting to people that want to stand in elections, and it’s off-put-
ting to the students that EUSA is supposed to be representing. “Nobody wants EUSA to turn into a mini-parliament with mini-parties vying for the biggest number of seats on Student Council.” However, members of Defend Edinburgh criticised the wording of the referendum question as being misleading. Aurora Adams, EUSA representative and member of Defend Edinburgh told The Student defended the group stating, “EUSA has never allowed candidates to share funding - it would be outrageous if it did.” Those who campaigned against ‘question 10’ further argued that in actual fact many students on the Student Council run together in groups, but it is only those in a slate who are open and clear about the principles they share. Continued on page three »
News: The Student offers a guide to the referendum results p3 Comment: Dan Heap discusses the value of a referendum vote p8
13/02/2012 03:05:08