10 models for Identity & Branding

10 models for Identity & Branding Schematic tools to assist the understanding of complex problems and the identification of solutions Renaat Van Cauwenberge TOTAL IDENTITY

About the author Renaat Van Cauwenberge (1959) studied philosophy at Ghent University and took a management course at Valrico Business School. After graduating, he worked as a freelance newspaper journalist at ‘De Morgen’ and in the promotion & communications department at Amnesty International.

On 1 April 1989, he founded the design & communications agency, GRAMMA, together with number of colleagues. In 2003, GRAMMA formed a strategic alliance with its Dutch partner, Total Identity.

This gave GRAMMA the opportunity of growing into a creative consultancy.

Renaat’s primary work areas are education, social profit & local government. His objective is to make organisations able to see beacons; beacons which provide clarity and direction creating movement towards a shared and clear destination.

Identity & Branding in 10 models Schematic tools to assist the understanding of complex problems and the identification of solutions Renaat Van Cauwenberge

2015 TOTAL IDENTITY Antwerp

Models as tools

With a sketch on a flip chart and a minimum amount of words, you can suddenly make a complicated subject a whole lot simpler. This was what we had in mind when we started the ‘Identity & Branding’ feature for CxO Magazine. In this issue, we are going to bundle together the first 10 models. In as many double spreads, we shall put forward approaches and models for managing communications: on the left a schematic representation; on the right a brief explanation with a description of the model and the practical applications that we have observed. The models are intended for communications in situations in which every organisation has ever encountered (merger, change process, positioning, crisis etc.) or simply in day-to-day management issues such as marketing, maintaining the network of relationships, competitor analyses etc.

A model can simplify the reality and constrict your vision. That’s correct!

A model can blind you or be too abstract. That’s correct, too! In other words, models are dangerous, but the danger ebbs away visibly when you use it as a tool. This is when models become magical. You get an overview in a single diagram. Models make something complex understandable. A schematic tool to analyse and solve complicated problems. A tool that helps you organise and structure thoughts, angles and perspectives.

This way, as a communications manager, you have an instrument that you can actually work with, rather than one which you blindly accept.

3

Corporate identity mix.

The mirror of the organisation.

(CxO Magazine, April 2012)

4

In essence, the Birkigt & Stadler model (subsequently adapted by C. Van Riel) shows the relationship between the organisation’s self-presentation (the desired image) and its perceived identity (image). The model shows that the image is a reflection of an organisation’s identity. Three elements (outer circle) form the concrete manifestations of the organisation’s deeper personality. Using this model, managers can gain insight into the balance between the organisation’s identity and the image that the organisation creates among different target groups.

Personality is the ambition of the organisation and the way it responds to stimuli from the force field. The ambition relates to the organisation’s positioning and profiling. What this means is that the organisation must know itself well (vision, mission, culture, structure, core competencies, values etc.), if it is to present itself clearly. The symbolism of an organisation can be described in terms of ‘the style of the house’. By introducing unity to the visual presentation, a coherent image is conveyed. Communication describes an organisation’s verbal, visual and written messages to the different target groups. Its behaviour comprises how the organisation acts on a daily basis. How does the organisation (its staff) treat customers? How does it handle arguments? What about keeping its promises?

A strong corporate identity –– ties in with its core activities; –– ties in with the organisation as a whole; –– is in line with an organisation’s roots.

–– is distinctive and appeals to a range of target groups.

The idea that the image is merely a photographic print of its identity is a thing of the past. The most important point put by this thought model is realising that a sharply profiled identity can provide clear direction to the organisation’s image.

Source: Birkigt, Stadler, M.M (1986), Corporate Identity, Grundlagen, Funktionen, Fallspielen.

Verlag Moderne Industrie, Landsberg an Lech.

5

Brand compass 2.0 gives your brand direction (CxO Magazine, April 2014)

6

Organisations are increasingly looking for a sharp profile in order to deepen existing customer relations and create new ones in an everchanging environment. In order to bring this about, it is now necessary to be explicit about who the organisation actually is at the moment. The brand compass is a useful instrument for mapping an organisation’s DNA. The compass collects and organises the self-chosen challenges in terms of brand positioning and makes them tangible and communicative for all employees.

Carefully weighted structure The brand compass consists of three parts, each of which represents a separate domain. The first box consists of the mission, vision and ambition and says something about the organisation’s identity. The second box consists of the organisation’s symbolism, core values, brand personality and pay-off and represents a shift from internal to external focus.

The third and final box represents the organisation’s proposition. This part looks at the evidence of the brand promise. It is here that the instrumental and emotional benefits (USPs, reasons to buy) are formulated and named. On one side of the model we see the preconditions and on the other the target groups.

The brand compass serves the following purposes: –– It provides your brand policy with direction.

–– It acts as a consensus builder.

–– It serves as a touchstone.

–– It checks whether communications products, PR activities etc. match the chosen brand objectives.

–– It is a systematic blueprint that serves as a consistency monitor.

–– It lends direction to the organisation’s collective ambition.

Deliverable: a sharpened corporate identity An A3 with the blueprint of the organisation’s vision, ambition, brand personality, values, propositions etc. From concrete communications products it is possible to test the extent to which they match the organisation’s (brand) ambitions.

7

Brand House Model (CxO Magazine, February 2015)

8

In order for the whole organisation to get to work with the brand, it is important that the chosen position is worded clearly and powerfully. The Brand House Model is a powerful way of summarising the brand so that it can be used internally as a compass. The Brand House is made up of three issues: the brand dream (the social ambition of the brand), the brand promise (the emotional return when the brand is used) and the brand values (which together describe the brand’s character).

The brand dream describes the ‘why’. It describes the higher aim or the organisation’s conviction. The dream is socially relevant and inspires some, but not everyone.

The brand promise describes the ‘what’. This is the emotional ‘what’ rather than the functional ‘what’. The promise concerns what the organisation is able to offer the external and internal customers. What effect does the brand have on customers? At the same time the promise, or an element of it, is propagated in the communications and pay-off.

The brand values describe the ‘how’. The brand values are the compass for the organisation, although they are not the GPS with specific coordinates. They provide direction whilst offering space.

The two anchor values are the two legs on which the brand stands. They form the foundation of the brand. They are features which the brand excels at and they are already being lived up to today. The self-worth expresses the brand’s uniqueness. It is the most distinctive and quintessential part of the brand. This value provides the greatest indication of what the organisation stands for. The aspiration values indicate the area in which the brand can still be developed. These values are potentially present and indicate the area in which the brand is willing and able to improve.

The tension between the values is what makes the brand attractive to people. This means that a value never stands alone; it is always concerned with the relationship between the different brand values. The brand values also need to match the direction of the positioning.

Source: Brand House Model: Van Eck, Willems & Leenhouts (2008)

9

The brand scenario vs. the identity scenario (CxO Magazine, August 2013)

10

For many years, the brand scenario has proved its worth as an instrument for presenting and maintaining a brand. The aim of this scenario is to generate appreciation for the brand. For this to be achieved, the first priority is for the brand to stand out from the rest, doing whatever it takes, so that it is able to establish a position in the marketplace. Once the brand has a presence within the market and is known to the recipient (again, doing whatever it takes), the scenario focuses on communicating the brand. These communications must ensure that people reflect and recognise themselves in the brand. They have to see what they want to see in the brand. Finally, a marketing communications programme needs to ensure that the brand takes root, is given authorisation and, of course, leads to increasing sales of the product concerned.

In this case, the identity scenario offers more possibilities. Whereas the brand scenario initially wishes to distinguish itself from other brands in order to harvest long-term appreciation, the identity scenario actually works the opposite way. This scenario concentrates on making sure that what the organisation stands for becomes known and in turn acquires meaning for its environment. With identity, it is not all about what sets us apart, but what ties us to our customers and other stakeholders. The communications do not operate from within a marketing paradigm. The focus in on the authentic motives, ambition, policy, values, principles and spearheads of the organisation itself. It is not only the product or service that count, but also the context in which they are supplied. The more transparent you are as an organisation, the more chance you will give your target group to commit to you. Only when this bond exists will there be added value, enabling your organisation to win over appreciation, trust, sympathy and, consequently, future perspective. With our approach, it is not the product’s sender that takes a central role, but rather the values and principles that we share with our customers.

11

The deeper motives of target groups (CxO Magazine, February 2014)

12

An effective way of sharpening the identity of an organisation is by means of brand archetyping. This method was inspired by the psychology of Carl G. Jung. The motives that underpin the archetypes are plotted in two dimensions: closed versus open and control versus flexibility. Closed versus open refers to the question about the extent to which an organisation exposes itself to outside influences. Control versus flexibility refers to the question of how management treats its workforce: are they given too much freedom and trust to perform their job as well as possible or are they constantly checked by means of all manner of control mechanisms? These two dimensions create four quadrants – always incorporating three archetypes – that are also known as ‘motivational segments’ or worlds of perception.

Archetypes are certain kinds of inherited ways of responding or universal templates that are stored in the subconscious of every human being.

They are typically activated whenever people recognise them in certain situations. Archetypes refer to a certain tendency to respond in a particular way to circumstances we encounter in life. They are intrinsically neither good nor bad. The nice thing about an archetype is that everyone is aware of it on a subconscious level. An archetype is therefore a universal set of roles and situations that are recognisable to everybody.

These archetypes for the basis of the ambitions that people have. Experience has taught us that archetypes are understood very well in organisations, both at the top and on the work floor, making them a very powerful instrument.

Working with archetypes offers practical benefits when developing corporate identities, ensuring that there is a clear framework within which the brand can manifest itself and immediate recognition among consumers. After all, an individual set of values belongs to each archetype. Since archetypes are timeless, everybody is familiar with the characteristics of each specific one.

13

A strong corporate brand yields a profit (CxO Magazine, January 2011)

14

Swedish research (Gromark, Bo Asvik, Melin – 2005) shows that brandoriented organisations are more profitable. It also shows that organisations handle the capability of developing a strong corporate brand in completely different ways. Using eight factors, the research makes distinctions between four types of organisations, based on the extent to which they place the emphasis internal or external focus when developing their brand.

In order of least to most brand orientated, the four types of organisations are: –– Sceptics - brand as logo: principally describing the corporate brand as ‘logo’ and ‘name’. The corporate brand is nothing more than a trade name and actually remains unused.

–– Salesmen - the brand as a sales tool: seeing the corporate brand mainly as a tactical sales instrument. Here, the corporate brand is the responsibility of the marketing department. On the list of priorities it has to let the product brands go first.

–– Educators - the brand as internal socialisation mechanism: seeing the corporate brand as an instrument that can steer the workforce’s behaviour. They work under the assumption that dedicated employees mean satisfied customers. They see a strong connection between a strong corporate culture and a strong corporate brand.

–– Leaders - the brand as a central philosophy for the organisation: giving priority to the corporate brand and using it as a philosophy, departure point, support etc. in the performance of internal and external activities.

For some, the corporate brand is nothing more than a logo or merely a sales tool. Others see it as an internal socialisation mechanism. The winners are the ones who see the corporate brand as the central philosophy for the organisation. This Swedish research shows that there is a positive correlation between the extent to which organisations are brand oriented and their financial performance. Organisations that truly use the brand to give them direction are, on average, more profitable than organisations that do so to a lesser extent: working at brand orientation pays off!

Source: Gromark, J., Astvik, TB, Melin, F (2005) Brand orientation index

15

The Golden Circle: communicating with character (CxO Magazine, June 2013)

16

The Golden Circle is a thought model developed by Simon Sinek. He talks about three levels in organisations: what you do, why you do it and how you do it. What are the products or services that an organisation sells. How is the explanations given by organisations on how they do what they do. Why concerns what drives organisations. According to Sinek, organisations that acts from their ‘why’ are more successful because they connect with the personal values of their interest groups.

Sinek makes the comparison between the Golden Circle and the human brain. The ‘what’ can be compared to the neocortex. This is the section of the brain responsible for rational and analytical thoughts and language. The two inner circles correspond to the brain’s limbic system. This section of the brain is responsible for people’s emotions. It is also in charge of all human behaviour and decision making. The limbic system does not have any capacity for language. When organisations start to communicate what it is they do, they appeal to their customers’ rational approach. The customers understand the information they are fed, although this is not what stimulates their behaviour. When companies start at the core of the model (‘why’), they directly address the section of the brain that is in charge of making decisions. The language section then attempts to explain rationally why someone should have taken a certain decision.

However, that is hard to put into words which often leads to rational explanations that do not tally with the actual reason for a decision. It is therefore difficult for companies to respond adequately to people’s emotions when they focus on the ‘what’. It would therefore be better to influence emotions by inspiring them (‘why’) than manipulating reason (‘what’).

Source: Sinek, S. (2009), Start with why: how great leaders inspire everyone to take action.

Penguin Group, New York, N.Y.

17

Manage the gap: parallelism of brand and identity (CxO Magazine, April 2013)

18

Panta Rhei. Changes are always ongoing. Knowledge of this dynamic leads to accelerating corporate performance. Innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority and laggards represent actuality and change. The strategic underlying question is: how do I create enough volume and how do I simultaneously arrive at the correct innovation challenge. Brand versus identity. Volume versus innovation: Manage the gap.

Business role playing, innovators. This small group of ‘channel builders’ and opinion leaders is focused on the organisation in relation to its environment. At the core they strengthen the connection among relevant stakeholders by actively participating in dialogue in order to extend the network.

Landscaping, early adopters. This group is made up of ‘platform builders’.

First of all, they activate the network by mapping out the relationship the organisation has with its environment. This landscaping of the environment ensures that there is influence in the force field.

Corporate story, early majority. The early majority are the ‘story builders’.

The organisation’s relationship with itself and the outward communicative force are the main focus. The corporate story, as a story offering good prospects, forms the strategic instrument.

Corporate identity, late majority. The late majority are ‘identity builders’.

The organisations are aware of their ambitions and use communication to express them, the aim being future perspective. Dynamic, creative design and target-group-focused communications go hand in hand. The corporate brand as a strategic instrument represents a fixed beacon or orientation point.

Corporate design, laggards. This final group represents a decreasing minority where no innovation or volume is to be found. Organisations see the added value of design as something that will increase their visibility and recognisability. The corporate design, the house style, is the strategic instrument.

Source: Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

19

Economically viable identity (CxO Magazine, June 2012)

20

Underpinning our vision is the concept that corporate identity is the expression of the organisation’s collective vision. However, apart from its function as beckoning perspective, identity can also have a direct economic function for the organisation. In the graph, connections are made between the economic dynamic within an organisation and its identity. This is because identity is not only an ideal, it is also the engine driving the everyday running of the organisation – using innovative capacity as fuel. The point of departure for the economic dynamic within organisations is the product life cycle (PLC). The PLC describes, in chronological order, the transition of a product from the development phase through its introduction to the market, growth, maturity and decline and ultimately its disposal.

The dotted line on the chart also indicates the phasing of the market dynamic. During the development phase, the organisation still has a monopoly position; from the introduction the organisation first enjoys unlimited, then limited growth, price competition and hypercompetition leading to its decline. The point where the saturation line meets the PLC curve is where the shake-out takes place.

As a turning point, the transition towards a new cycle is crucial: the more capable a company is of forecasting the moment of innovation and starting the cycle, the better it will be for the organisation.

It is the deciding factor for the organisation’s innovative ability.

Just before the point at which the difference on the y axis between the PLC curve and the saturation line is the biggest, is when a transition to a new standard needs to take place. It is at this point in time that the experiment phase needs to start.

As soon as the PLC of product X enters the growth phase, is the moment for a transition to developing a new product Y. Product Y does not yet exist though, either as an idea or an experiment, let alone as market expectation. The success of the transition therefore depends highly on the corporate characteristics: culture, methods, capabilities etc.

21

The new way to customer satisfaction (CxO Magazine, October 2012)

22

The much increased significance of the customer in our service economy demands a new form of customer relations. We will re-examine these relations with a supplement to Treacy and Wiersema’s value creation model. According to that model you can stand out from your competitors by focusing on the product (product leadership), on the process (operational excellence) or on the customer (customer intimacy). Given that you cannot be the best at everything, you concentrate best on a single dimension to beat the competition at it. Companies can use this model to make strategic choices. The reality, however, points out to us that we have become a perception society in which serving the customer takes a central role. Increasingly, the customers make their decisions based upon softer aspects such as emotion, perception and relations. Moreover, in the 21st century they have become damned critical individuals who are hard to manage. What it boils down to is that you have to create a context for the customers that contributes to their self-realisation and use it as a base on which to build up a structured and high quality customer relationship.

This leads to a transition of the Treacy and Wiersema model. Operational excellence becomes strategic sourcing. Customer intimacy becomes social networking. Product leadership becomes service leadership. Nowadays, many organisations share the motto: become the ultimate customer-oriented company. The ultimate customer-oriented organisation develops by internalising the principles of customer interaction, emphasising them in its positioning and, as such, repeatedly creating valuable encounters. The customer is no longer interested in receiving a product or service (product push). Instead, they are increasingly looking for interaction and perception (market pull). Organisations which succeed in doing so possess a large adaptive capability. They are able to identify with their customers, they have a desire to learn and they meet their target group with openness. The ultimate result is co-creation: the customer contributes to the organisation and the things it produces.

23

TOTAL IDENTITY Fit for the future The Netherlands TOTAL IDENTITY Identity ∞ Branding Pedro de Medinalaan 9 1086 XK Amsterdam Telephone +31 (0)20 750 9500 www.totalidentity.nl info@totalidentity.nl Provincialeweg 144 5503 HK Veldhoven Telephone +31 (0)40 820 0209 www.totalidentity.nl eindhoven@totalidentity.nl

PARTNERS The Netherlands KOEWEIDEN POSTMA Pedro de Medinalaan 9 1086 XK Amsterdam Telephone +31 (0)20 750 9500 www.koeweidenpostma.com info@koeweidenpostma.com C&F REPORT Finance ∞ Sustainability Pedro de Medinalaan 9 1086 XK Amsterdam Telephone +31 (0)20 750 9500 www.cfreport.nl info@cfreport.nl

TOTAL ACTIVE MEDIA Interaction ∞ Activation Pedro de Medinalaan 9 1086 XK Amsterdam Telephone +31 (0)20 750 9500 www.totalactivemedia.nl info@totalactivemedia.nl

Belgium TOTAL IDENTITY Total Gramma cvba Gijzelaarsstraat 29 B-2000 Antwerp Telephone +32 3 230 4270 www.totalidentity.be antwerpen@totalidentity.com

TOTAL PUBLIC Presence ∞ Participation Mauritskade 1 P.O. Box 221 2501 CE The Hague Telephone +31 (0)70 311 0530 www.totalpublic.nl info@totalpublic.nl

Germany WIRDESIGN BRAUNSCHWEIG Sophienstrasse 40 38118 Braunschweig Contact: Norbert Gabrysch Telephone +49 531 888 10 www.wirDesign.de welcome@wirDesign.de WIRDESIGN BERLIN Gotzkowskystrasse 20/21 10555 Berlin Contact: Andreas Schuster Telephone +49 302 757 280 www.wirDesign.de Berlin@wirDesign.de Korea SANDOLL COMMUNICATIONS INC. 206-15, Myeongnyun 4-ga, Jongno-gu Seoul Contact: Paul Geumho Seok Telephone +82 2 741 3685 www.sandoll.co.kr seokgh@sandoll.co.kr BRANDMAJOR 4, 5FL. Kia building 1535-12 Seocho Dong Seocho Gu Seoul Contact: Lee Ye-Hyun Telephone +82 2 598 2013 www.brandmajor.com webmaster@brandmajor.com CDR KOREA Kingrun Bldg. 2F, 48 Bongeunsa-ro, 29-gil, Gangnam-gu Seoul Contact: Alex Kim Telephone +82 2 518 2470 www.cdr.co.kr webmaster@cdr.co.kr