“LOCAL ADULTS”

Create a collaborative community driven by local needs

May prefer clarity, hierarchy and representation. Prefer to work in Norwegian. May struggle to work with “Activists”

Long-term conclusion

There is a need for alternative planning approaches to face global challenges. Fargemarka Boligprosjekt can be an example for the application of participation into planning processes.

Theprocess of carrying out action research was challenging and insightful for the Research Group, despite the interruption from the Covid-19 global pandemic. Analytic social science gains “insight into some broader set of social phenomena than those provided by the data themselves” (Anderson, 2006, p. 387), and therefore it was necessary for the Research Group to consider their analysis, and the research question, in the context of three broader academic domains and interpretations of planning in the global context. Driving Fargemarka’s process through personal interest whilst working through the university gave the Research Group a unique perspective, and allowed them to integrate both academic theory and actions.

The Fargemarka Boligprosjekt Association unifies elements of the discussed theory. It tries to challenge established systems and shows alternative ways and modes of planning whilst attempting to align with the Municipality’s development goals, the New Urban Agenda and Sustainable Development Goals.

Harnessing non-traditional planning theory has supported the identification of key opportunities for nascent urban experiments. Through action-research, the Muslica Research Group hopes to have demonstrated analytically sound signposts for different stakeholders to create sustainable and meaningful communities of care.

The words of Turner give hope for Fargemarka Boligprosjekt, highlighting that autonomy in the built environment not only provides exceptional value for money and high levels of utility in proportion to resources invested, but creates aesthetically satisfying and culturally meaningful environments (Turner, 1976).

Amankwaa, A., Koli, S., Podoski, L., Rouzières, Y. (2019) Romolslia. Trondheim: Faculty of Architecture and Design

Anderson, L. (2006) Analytic autoethnography, J. Contemp. Ethnogr., 35(4), pp. 373-395. doi: 10.1177/0891241605280449.

Anitra Nelson, F. S. (2018) Housing for Degrowth: Principles, Models, Challenges and Opportunities

Arnstein, S. R. (1969) A Ladder Of Citizen Participation, Journal of the American Planning Association, 35, pp. 216-224.

Arup (2020) Green cities: ReLeaf initiative plants trees in Greater Manchester. Available at: https://www.arup.com/ projects/the-total-value-of-city-re-leaf (Accessed: 17.03. 2020)

Battistich, V., Solomon, D., Watson, M. and Schaps (1997) Caring school communities, Educational Psychologist, 32, pp. 137–151.

Bugeja, M. (2006) Interpersonal divide: The search for community in a technological age Journal of Communication, 56(4), pp. 864-866.

Cheryl R. Ellebrock, S. M. K. (2010) Creating a Ninth-Grade Community of Care, The Journal of Educational Research, 103(6), pp. 393-406.

Czischke, D. (2018) Collaborative housing and housing providers: towards an analytical framework of multistakeholder collaboration in housing co-production, International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(1), pp. 55-81. doi: 10.1080/19491247.2017.1331593.

Denshire, S. (2014) On auto-ethnography, Current Sociology, 62(6), pp. 831-850. doi: 10.1177/0011392114533339.

Dimitrova, M. (2020) Italian municipalities allowed to lease buildings to artists for redevelopment. Available at: https:// www.themayor.eu/en/italian-municipalities-allowed-tolease-buildings-to-artists-for-redevelopment (Accessed: 05.04 2020).

Fargamarka Boligprosjekt (2020) Vision. Available at: https:// fargemarka.no/en/index.html#1-Vision.md (Accessed: 10.05.2020).

Finn, D. (2014) DIY urbanism: implications for cities,

Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 7(4), pp. 381-398. doi: 10.1080/17549175.2014.891149.

González, E. R. et al. (2012) The grassroots and New Urbanism: a case from a Southern California Latino community, Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 5(2-3), pp. 219-239. doi: 10.1080/17549175.2012.693125.

Harvey, D. (2003) The right to the city, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), pp. 939-941. doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2003.00492.x.

Healy, E., Arunachalam, D. and Mizukami, T. (2016) Social Cohesion and the Challenge of Globalization, in Healy, E., Arunachalam, D. and Mizukami, T. (ed.) Creating Social Cohesion in an Interdependent World: Experiences of Australia and Japan. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, pp. 3-31.

Hillier, J. (2007) Stretching Beyond the Horizon: A Multiplanar Theory of Spatial Planning and Governance. Ashgate Publishing.

Hillier, J. (2008) Plan(e) speaking: A multiplanar theory of spatial planning, Planning Theory, 7(1), pp. 24–50.

Jacobs, J. (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities New York: Vintage Books.

Jenks, E. B. (2005) Explaining Disability, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 34(2), pp. 143-169. doi: 10.1177/0891241604272064.

Kathryn M. Mccamant, C. D. (1994) Cohousing: a contemporary approach to housing ourselves. Ten Speed Press.

Kelly, J. J., Jr. (2004) Refreshing the heart of the city: vacant building receivership as a tool for neighborhood revitalization and community empowerment, Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law, 13(2), pp. 238.

Kotus, J. and Sowada, T. (2017) Behavioural model of collaborative urban management: extending the concept of Arnstein’s ladder, Cities, 65, pp. 78-86. doi: 10.1016/j. cities.2017.02.009.

Kozeny, G. (1995) Intentional communities: Lifestyles based on ideals, Communities directory: A guide to cooperative living, pp. 18-24.

Lietaert, M. (2010) Cohousing’s relevance to degrowth theories Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), pp. 576-580.

Lockyer, J., & Benson, P. (with Burton, D., Felder, L., Hayes, D., Jackey, E., & Lerman, A.). (2011). “We try to create the world that we want”: Intentional communities forging livable lives in St. Louis (CSD Working Paper No. 11-02). St. Louis, MO: Washington University, Center for Social Development.

Lydon, M. (2015) Tactical Urbanism. Island Press/Center for Resource Economics : Imprint: Island Press.

Martinez López, M. A. (2013) The Squatters’ Movement in Europe: A Durable Struggle for Social Autonomy in Urban Politics, Antipode, 45(4), pp. 866-887. doi: 10.1111/j.14678330.2012.01060.x.

Maruyama, G. and Van Boekel, M. (2014) Action Research: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/obo/97801998283400149.

Miraftab, F. (2016) Insurgent Planning: Situating Radical Planning in the Global South. University of Illinois UrbanaChampaign.

OECD (2010) Paying for Biodiversity : Enhancing the CostEffectiveness of Payments for Ecosystem Services. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Pickerill, J. and Chatterton, P. (2006) Notes towards autonomous geographies: creation, resistance and selfmanagement as survival tactics, Progress in Human Geography, 30(6), pp. 730-746. doi: 10.1177/0309132506071516.

Pruijt, H. (2013) Squatting in Europe, Squatting in Europe: Radical spaces, urban struggles, pp. 17-60.

Rauws, W. (2016) Civic initiatives in urban development: selfgovernance versus self-organisation in Planning practice. (Essay), Town Planning Review, 87(3), pp. 339. doi: 10.3828/ tpr.2016.23.

Robb, K. (2016) Sustainable developments in question as off-the-plan buyers get greenwashed. Available at: https:// www.domain.com.au/news/sustainable-developments-inquestion-as-offtheplan-buyers-get-greenwashed-20160722gq8qw7/ (Accessed: 22.03.2020 2020).

Sager, T. (2016) Activist planning: a response to the woes of neo-liberalism?, European Planning Studies, 24(7), pp. 12621280.

Sager, T. (2018) Planning by intentional communities: An understudied form of activist planning, Planning Theory, 17(4), pp. 449-471. doi: 10.1177/1473095217723381.

Sandercock, L. (1997) Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities. Wiley.

Sargent, L. T. (1994) The Three Faces of Utopianism Revisited, Utopian Studies, 5(1), pp. 1 - 37.

Schussler, D. L. a. C., A. (2006) An empirical exploration of the who, what, and how of school care, Teachers College Record, 108, pp. 1460–1495.

Strongin, F. (2010) Imagining the Intentional Community Counterpublic.

Torill Nyseth, J. P., Trine Holm (2010) Planning beyond the horizon: The Tromsø experiment, Planning Theory, 9(3), pp. 223-247.

Trondheim Municipality (2019) Byutviklingsstrategi for Trondheim - strategi for areal- og transportutvikling fram mot 2050.

Turner, J. F. C. (1976) Housing by people: towards autonomy in building environments. Marion Boyars.

United Nations (2015) Sustainable Development Goals. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs (Accessed: 01.05.2020).

United Nations (2017) New Urban Agenda. Available at: http:// habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/NUA-English.pdf (Accessed: 01.05.2020).

Yamamoto, A. D. (2017) Why agonistic planning? Questioning Chantal Mouffe’s thesis of the ontological primacy of the political, Planning Theory, 16(4), pp. 384-403. doi: 10.1177/1473095216654941.

Zérah, M.-H., Chakravarty, S. and Negi, R. (2016) Space, Planning and Everyday Contestations in Delhi. New Delhi: New Delhi: Springer India.

Please find on the following pages the ‘weekly record sheets’ - a documentation of our conducted work.