REGULATION and REIMBURSEMENT of CLI CELL THERAPY
Václav Procházka Fakultní nemocnice Ostrava
Regenerative medicine
The subject of our activities are autologous and allogeneic cells of human body tissue, and products of materials engineering.
!# Ongoing
ARM Database
Industry-Sponsored RM Trials by Stage
Research
Pre-Clinical
Early-Stage (Ph. I)
Mid-Stage (Ph. II)
Late-Stage (Ph. III)
58 Trials
245 Trials
70 Trials
174 Trials
24 Trials
Late&Stage!Industry&Sponsored!RM!Trials! Stroke, 2%
Skin, 2%
! 185 Therapeutic Companies ! 320 Regen Med Products
Early&to&Mid!Stage!Industry&Sponsored!RM!Trials!
Other, 2%
Ocular, 4% AutoImmune, 4%
Other,#18%# Skin,#2%# Cancer, 32%
Cardiovascular, 11%
Cancer,#28%#
Spinal#Cord# Injury#,#3%# Diabetes,#4%# Stroke,#5%#
Non-healing wounds, 15%
Ocular,# 5%# Musculoskeletal , 28%
AutoImmune,#7%# Musculoskeletal,# 8%#
Cardiovascular,# 12%# NonP healing# wounds,# 8%#
Goal of stem cell therapy • Regeneration (916) •Cell therapy (nonregenerative) (126) •Gene therapy (96) •Stem cell collection/mobilization (30) •Bioscaffold (15) •Immunotherapy (13) Target of stem cell therapy • Immune system (260) • Heart (197) • Marrow (157) • CBS (125) • Vascular system (90) Mechanism of disease being treated • Injury or degeneration (400) • Ischemia (274) • Drug – (chemotherapy) or radiationinduced damage (224) • Immune attack (142) • Congential or inherited disease (79) • Neoplasia (52) • Infection (10) • Healthy volunteers (10)
Principle disease/condition targeted •Cardiovascular disease (278) •Neurological disease (169) •Cancer (97) •Liver disease (67) •Bone condition (65) •Other (56) •Immunodeficiency and other nonmalignant hematologic condtitions (49) •Gastrointestinal disease (46) •Systemic rheumological disease (45) •Diabetes (43) •Eye disease (39) •Skin condition (19) •Organ transplant-associated (18) •Lung disease (15) •Kidney condition (8) Stem cell type •Hematopoietic (432) •Mesenchymal (432) •Endothelial progenitor cells (69) •Other (69) •Neural (22) •Unspecified (20) •Limbal (16) •Embyronic (6) •Cardial (6)
Stem cell tissue source • Bone marrow (439) •Peripheral blood (170) •No sampling (112) •Umblical cord (99) •Unspecified (95) •Adipose tissue (92) •Eye (16) •Brain (12) •Placenta (9) •Heart (6) •Embryo (6) Stem cell manipulation •Cultured (441) •Purified (236) •Drug treatment (95) •Gene modified (79) •None (115) •Other (49) •Unspecified (43) Graft donor source •Autologous (594) •Allogeneic (305) •Autologous and allogeneic •No stem cell graft (118) •Nospecified (33)
Two Type of Stem Cells
EMBRYONIC SC
Totipotent They can create all kind s of human cells They survive in tissue Cultures Easily accessible
ADULT SC
Organ-specific
They can create a several cell types
Limited survival
Difficult isolation
Embryonic SC are totipotent
Astrocytes
Neurons
Neurons
Adipocytes
Pericytes
ADULT SC - multipotent
Vasculogenesis ď †
Bone Marrow Endothelial Progenitor Cells (EPC) produce new blood vessels (de novo) in HYPOXIC conditions via localized recruitment, proliferation and differentiation of cells.
Tepper O, et al; BLOOD: 2005
Vessel wall stabilisation
LEGAL ASPECTS of NO-CLI Cell Therapy Legislation before 2008
Cells and their preparations regulated by law 285/2002 Sb. „Transplantation law“
Legislation after 2008
The harmonization of Czech law with legislation of EU-EMA (CAT)
From 2008 active two laws 296/2008 Sb. "The law of human tissues and cells "
378/2007 Sb. „The law on Pharmaceuticals“
BMMNC harvesting and application Point-of-Care in the same OR procedure
15 Min.
Aspirate
Aspirate the desired volume of Bone Marrow
Process
Place into the SmartPReP System
Utilize
Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate [BMAC]
The Law 296/2008
Regulates tissue transplants
Regulates cell transplants Decree no. 422/2008 Coll.
establishing detailed requirements for ensuring the quality
and safety of human tissues and cells intended for use in humans
Minimal handling allowed for transplants
Cutting Comminution Shaping Centrifugation Soaking in antibiotic or antimicrobial solutions Sterilization Irradiation Separation, concentration or purification of cells Filtering Lyophilisation Freezing Cryopreservation Vitrification
Law 378/2007 Regulation of the European Parliament and Council Regulation ( EC) no. 1394/2007 of 13 November 2007 on medicinal products for
advanced therapy and amending Directive 2001 /83 / EC and Regulation ( EC ) no. 726/2004
Advance Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs)
Somatocellular therapy
Tissue engineering products
Gene therapy
Advance Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) – NATIC Brno
22
Stem cell therapy Time line of RM product
Approvals and reimbursemenet of final products for clinical care
Aplication area - SOPs, Clinical research
Harvesting area – Clean room GMP
SOPs - GMP SUKL –Tissue center
EMA/SUKL/Min.of Health/ Insurance comp-VZP
Clinical translational research
Harvesting, manufacturing, Package, Labeling and transfer
Facility certification (cGMP)
Regulatory requirements for ATMP - Cell Therapy Products
Viability testing
Bacteriology and Virology testing
Imunephenotyping
Replication activity testing – CFU
Proteomics
Final product cell profiling
MSI – Microsatelite stability
Aray based Gene Expression
Telomerase testing Company Logo
Source tissue for regenerative medicine 1
Bone marrow
2
Adipose tissue, ASC-SVF, ASC-CM
3
Cord blood & tissue, placenta, amniotic tissue
4
Autologous cultered bioptic samples
5
Reprogramed cells-iPSc
6
Peripheral blood – APC, fPRP
7
Limbal cells, Beta cells, etc. 21 October 2013
Development of Stem Cell Preparations Risk Based Approach Stem Cell-Type, Degree and Type of Manipulation Autologous vs. Allogenic concept and intended use determine risk assessment. High
Low
Primary SC (HSC, MSC, MNC)
Expanded (Cell Lines, SC’s (MSC)
Manipulated / Preconditioned SC’s (HSC, MSC)
Genetically Manipulated SC’s (HSC, MSC)
Adult SC’s (intrinsic SC Pool): Multipotent Source: EU ATMP Position Reflection Paper
inVitro Reprogammed SC’s
iPSC (Pluripot ent)
inVitro Established Cell Lines
ESC (Pluripotent)
When to think about reimbursement ? Reimbursement Clinical Research Phase III
Basic research
Preaclinical research
Clinical Research Phase I-II
1
2
3
4
5
Academic research & Comercial Institutional research
Clean rooms, GMP facility & SOPs for Quality control
Clinical studies & Partnering with Universities and comercionalisat ion
Marketing & Production Commercial transfer & Inovations
Knowledge Transfer
Inovations
Basic Research
Knowledge generation
Animal testing of hypothesis
Safety and efficacy testing
Clinical Transfer
Hind-limb ischemia projects FN Ostrava
1. Preclinical rat model of hind-limb ischemia
28
Hind-limb ischemia projects FN Ostrava
1. Preclinical rat model of hind-limb ischemia
29
Hind-limb ischemia projects FN Ostrava
2. Preclinical diabetic rabbitt model of hind-limb ischemia
30
Clinical Trials of Cell Therapy in CLI A Decade of Experience To Date: 45 Clinical Trials (7 RCT) including 1272 Patients. Author
Year
Trial Type
N Total
Benoit (6) Idei (32) Lu (42) Madaric (44) Murphy (51) Perin (55) Powell (56) Ruiz-Salmeron (58) Subrammaniyan (65) Walter (69) Burt (8) Higashi (26) Horie (27) Lara-Hernandez (38) Mizuno (48) Prochazka (57) Amann (1) Franz (19) Kawamoto (36) Moriya (49) Chochola (9) Cobellis (10) De Vriese (11) Matoba (46)
2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2009 2009 2009 2009 2008 2008 2008 2008
RCT Cohort RCT Case series Case series Case series RCT Case series Case series RCT w cross Case series Case series Case series Case series Case series RCT Case series Case series Case series Case series Case series Case series Case series Case series
48 97 82 31 30 10 46 20 6 40 9 16 162 28 8 96 51 9 17 42 24 10 16 115
Benoit: Cell Transplantation (2013)
N N Treated Control 34 51 41 31 30 10 32 20 6 19 9 16 162 28 8 42 51 9 17 42 24 10 16 115
14 46 41 0 0 0 14 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Author
Year
Trial Type
N Total
Motukuru (50) Napoli (52) Van Tongeren (68) Wester (70) Zhang (72) Bartsch (5) Hernandez (24) Huang (31) Saito (60) Arai (2) Durdu (12) Koshikawa (37) Miyamoto (47) Huang (29) Ishida (33) Lenk (39) Higashi (25) Huang (30) Saigawa (59) Esato (14) Tateishi-Yuyama (66)
2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2007 2007 2007 2007 2006 2006 2006 2006 2005 2005 2005 2004 2004 2004 2002 2002
Case series Cohort Case series Case series Case series Cohort Case series Case series Case series RCT Case series Case series Case series RCT Case series Case series Case series Case series Case series Case series Case series
36 36 27 8 15 25 12 150 14 25 28 7 8 28 6 7 7 5 8 8 45
N N Treated Control 36 18 27 8 15 13 12 150 14 13 28 7 8 14 6 7 7 5 8 8 45
0 18 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NO-CLI Trial Results
New England Medical Center Boston, USA
Fransizkus Hospital Berlin, Germany
Sri Ramachandra Chennai, India
University Bratislava Bratislava, Slovakia Studie 4 National Grant, Slovakia
13 %
Cell Transplantation, Vol. 19, pp. 1413–1424, 2010 Printed in the USA. All rights reserved. Copyright Ó 2010 Cognizant Comm. Corp.
0963-6897/10 $90.00 + .00 DOI: 10.3727/096368910X514170 E-ISSN 1555-3892 www.cognizantcommunication.com
Cell T herapy, a New Standard in M anagement of Chronic Critical L imb I schemia and Foot Ulcer V. Procha´ zka,* J. Gumulec,† F. Jalu˚ vka,‡ D. Sˇ alounova´ ,§ T. Jonszta,* D. Czerny´ ,* J. Krajcˇ a,* R. Urbanec,‡ P. Klement,¶ J. Martinek,# and G. L. Klement** *Radiodiagnostic Institute, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic †Hemato-Oncological Center, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic ‡Surgery Clinic and Anaesthesiology Department, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic §Department of Mathematical Methods in Economy, VSˇ B-Technical University Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic ¶Henderson Research Center, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada #Clinical Laboratory, J.G. Mendel Cancer Center, Novy Jicin, Czech Republic **Children’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical University, Boston, MA, USA
Amputation rate 50% 45%
44%
40%
35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10%
Fifty percent of diabetics (7% of general population) suffer from peripheral arterial occlusive disease, which may lead to amputation due to critical limb ischemia (CLI). The aim of our study was to prevent major limb amputation (MLA) in this group of patients using a local application of autologous bone marrow stem cells (ABMSC) concentrate. A total of 96 patients with CLI and foot ulcer (FU) were randomized into groups I and II. Patients in group I (n = 42, 36 males, 6 females, 66.2 ± 10.6 years) underwent local treatment with ABMSC while those in group II (n = 54, control, 42 males, 12 females, 64.1 ± 8.6 years) received standard medical care. The frequency of major limb amputation in groups I and II was 21% and 44% within the 120 days of follow up, respectively (p < 0.05). Only in salvaged limbs of group I both toe pressure and toe brachial index increased (from 22.66 ± 5.32 to 25.63 ± 4.75 mmHg and from 0.14 ± 0.03 to 0.17 ± 0.03, respectively, mean ± SEM). The CD34 + cell counts in bone marrow concentrate (BMC) decreased (correlation, p = 0.024) with age, even 21% though there was no correlation between age and healing. An unexpected finding was made of relative, bone marrow lymphopenia in the initial bone marrow concentrates in patients who failed ABMSC therapy (21% of MLA). This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.040). We conclude ABMSC therapy results in 79% limb salvage in patients suffering from CLI and FU. In the remaining 21% lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia were identified as potential causative factors, suggesting that at least a partial correction with platelet supplementation may be beneficial. Key words: Critical limb ischemia (CLI); Diabetic foot ulcer; Autologous bone marrow stem cells (ABMSC); Lymphopenia of bone marrow
5% 0% Control
I NT RODUCT I ON BMAC
In diabetic patients, nonhealing cutaneous ulcers are a significant clinical, social, and healthcare problem. Based on more than 10 million diabetic patients in the
suddenly and causes 50–67% of all nontraumatic lower extremity amputations. Fifty-two percent of diabetics with CLI die during the 4.5 year follow up (35,36). Standard treatment of chronic wounds, and especially those secondary to CLI, includes surgical revasculariza-
BEFORE PŘED
AFTER PO
BEFORE PŘED
AFTER PO
BEFORE PŘED
AFTER PO
BEFORE PŘED
AFTER PO
BEFORE PŘED
AFTER PO
BEFORE PŘED
AFTER PO
Results of 5 Meta-analysis for Amputation and Wound healing Meta studies cover clinical trials between the years 2002-2013 and include about 1,500 unique patients. Included rando mized studies are mainly large proportion of which are controlled studies ( versus placebo or standard care ) .
[1] Wang, Zheng-Xu, et al. "Efficacy of Autologous Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cell Therapy in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease." Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis (2014).
[2] Fadini, Gian Paolo, Carlo Agostini, and Angelo Avogaro. "Autologous stem cell therapy for peripheral arterial disease: Meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature." Atherosclerosis 209.1 (2010): 10-17. [3] Liu, F. P., et al. "Autologous bone marrow stem cell transplantation in critical limb ischemia: a meta-analy sis of randomized controlled trials." Chinese medical journal 125.23 (2012): 4296-4300. [4] Teraa, Martin, et al. "Autologous Bone Marrowâ&#x20AC;&#x201C;Derived Cell Therapy in Patients With Critical Limb Ische mia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials." Annals of surgery 258.6 (2013): 922-929. [5] Benoit, Eric, Thomas F. O'Donnell, and Amit N. Patel. "Safety and efficacy of autologous cell therapy in critical limb ischemia: a systematic review." Cell transplantation 22.3 (2013): 545-562.
Results of 5 Meta-analysis for Amputation and Wound healing HARD ENDPOINTS [1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
Amputatiion 1y
OR=8.05
CI95% (3.58 - 18.08)
P < 0.00001
Amputation 3y
OR=22.33
CI95% (4.14 - 120.5)
P = 0.0003
Amputation
OR=11.11
CI95% (2.27 - 50.00)
P = 0.0005
Wound healing
OR=3.54
CI95% (1.09 - 11.51)
P = 0.032
Amputation
OR=2.70
CI95% (1.61 - 4.45)
P = 0.0002
Wound healing
OR=5.83
CI95% (2.37 - 14.29)
P = 0.0001
Amputation
RR=0.45
CI95% (0.27 - 0.75)
P = 0.002
Wound healing
RR=1.87
CI95% (1.49 -
P = 0.00001
Amputation
OR=2.77
2.36)
P = 0.0004
Results of 5 Meta-analysis for Amputation and Wound healing
B) Surrogate Endpoints [1]
[2]
[4]
[5]
ABI
12 weeks
MD 0.12
CI95% (0.07 - 0.16)
P<0.00001
ABI
24 weeks
MD 0.14
CI95%(0.10 - 0.17)
P<0.00001
ABI
48 weeks
MD 0.12
CI95%(0.02 - 0.23)
P=0.02
TcpO 12 weeks
MD 1.95 mmHg
CI95%(−7.41-11.3)
P=0.68
TcpO2 24 weeks
MD 6.89mmHg
CI95%(6.17 -7.62)
P<0.00001
TcpO2 48 weeks
MD 20.35mmHg
CI95%(12.51-28.19)
P<0.00001
Pain
MD −1.37
CI95%(−1.69-−1.04)
P < 0.00001
ABI
0.46 ± 0.04
0.63 ± 0.04
P = 0.011
TcpO2
22.8 ± 2.8
35.8 ± 2.9
P = 0.0002
Pain
6.35 ± 0.43
2.11 ± 0.37
p < 0.0001
Claudication interval
75.7 ± 19.4
402.3 ± 70.9
p < 0.0001
ABI
0.12
CI95%(.09,.15) ~+30%
P < 0.00001
TcpO2
14.26mmHg
CI95%(8.54,20.02) ~+30%
P < 0.00001
Pain
-1.1
CI95%(-1.37,-.83) ~+25%
P < 0.00001
Claudication interval
178.73m
CI95%(127.68,229.78)
P < 0.00001
ABI
Improvement
u 24 (studies) z 38
+63.2%
TcO2
Improvement
u 20 (studies) z 26
+76.9%
Pain
Improvement
u 33 (studies) z 37
+89.2%
Claudication interval
Improvement
u 17 (studies) z 19
+89.5%
Regulatory Status
USA: FDA 510K Cleared, EU: CE Mark with Expansion Claim
Diabetic foot and amputation rates in Czech republic 50 000 45 000 Počet případů
40 000 35 000 30 000 25 000
Diabetic foot
20 000
Amputations
15 000 10 000 5 000
Diabetická noha Amputace (%)
13 20
12 20
11 20
10 20
09 20
08 20
07 20
06 20
05 20
04 20
03 20
02 20
01 20
20
00
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
37 764
36 725
38 166
37 971
39 753
38 090
41 328
42 337
42 992
43 990
45 118
44 011
43 248
44 657
5 865 6 118 6 743 7 029 7 444 7 303 7 834 7 853 8 169 8 439 8 501 10 408 10 425 11 168 (15,53 %) (16,66 %) (17,67 %) (18,51 %) (18,73 %) (19,17 %) (18,96 %) (18,55 %) (19,00 %) (19,18 %) (18,84 %) (23,65 %) (24,11 %) (25,01 %)
Zdroj: Výkazy o činnosti zdravotnických zařízení pro obor diabetologie (A04), období: 2000 - 2013
Diabetic foot and amputation prices in FNO
Souhrn vykázané/uznané péče za pacienty, kteří prodělali amputaci kvůli poruše oběhového systému, kromě horních končetin a prstů u nohy, viz DRG báze 0515 - data za 01/2011 - 10/2014 (hosp. data dle DRG; preskripce a poukazy na zdrav. prostředky; amb. produkce) - zdroj dat: Archív vykázané/uznané péče FNO (datový sklad OSVZP a OFA) HOSPITALIZACE dle DRG Úhrada HOSP. - vše HOSP. přes Případový počet RČ dle výkonově s HB paušál DRG (před i DRG báze 0515 body LP Zum, Zulp ROK 0,90 Kč CM po amputaci) 2011 67 6 694 648 173 570 Kč 1 291 037 Kč 7 489 790 Kč 247,4431 7 988 940 Kč 2012 61 6 277 889 165 970 Kč 1 543 014 Kč 7 359 084 Kč 228,9441 7 727 830 Kč 2013 70 7 075 759 198 465 Kč 1 870 630 Kč 8 437 278 Kč 273,6646 8 706 160 Kč 01-10/2014 52 5 443 352 129 240 Kč 1 351 064 Kč 6 379 320 Kč 185,3878 6 106 743 Kč Celkem 25 491 648 667 245 Kč 6 055 744 Kč 29 665 472 Kč 935,4396 30 529 673 Kč * r. 2011-2013 - výpočet dle vyúčtování zdrav. služeb od jednotlivých ZP - vše Případovým paušálem (jako Alfa DRG); r. 2014 - dle Úhradové vyhlášky - vše Případovým paušálem (jako Alfa DRG)
ROK
prům. HOSP.
prům. PRESKR.
PRESKRIPCE HVLP, IVLP a ZP na poukaz
AMBULANCE**
počet RČ dle DRG Preskripce Léků a ZP báze 0515 pac. (před i po (před i po amputaci) HVLP IVLP ZP amputaci) 76 708 940 Kč 0 Kč 446 666 Kč 1 155 606 Kč 76 833 484 Kč 0 Kč 507 724 Kč 1 341 208 Kč 68 526 295 Kč 0 Kč 337 734 Kč 864 029 Kč 55 445 878 Kč 0 Kč 267 377 Kč 713 254 Kč 2 514 597 Kč 0 Kč 1 559 501 Kč 4 074 097 Kč
počet RČ dle Úhrada AMB. DRG báze 0515 (před i po (před i po amputaci) body Zum,Zulp amputaci) 97 2 550 391 481 640 Kč 2 536 251 Kč 88 2 791 178 420 305 Kč 2 648 800 Kč 94 2 400 561 685 029 Kč 2 571 565 Kč 73 694 910 118 054 Kč 686 750 Kč 8 437 040 1 705 028 Kč 8 443 366 Kč
** body přepočtené k 1.1.2014; úhrada za body dle HB dle úhradové vyhlášky (HB nesnižována) včetně výkonů: klinické stomatologie; CyberKnife; SDH; lůžek sociální péče; foniatrických pomůcek
Vážená prům. úhrada na RČ (Hosp, Preskr., Amb.)
prům. AMB.
2011
119 238 Kč
15 205 Kč
26 147 Kč
2012
126 686 Kč
17 647 Kč
30 100 Kč
2013
124 374 Kč
12 706 Kč
27 357 Kč
01-10/2014
117 437 Kč
12 968 Kč
9 408 Kč
160 590 Kč 174 433 Kč 164 437 Kč 139 813 Kč
Cena protézy : 85 tis Kč
Mean =Cena 166 vozíku:500 40 tisCZK Kč Prosthesis = 85 000 CZK wheelchair = 40 000 CZK Celkem= 291 500 CZK
Rehabilitation costs Social-economic costs EURODIALE – 500 600 CZK
REIMBURSEMENT
Czech angiology society
Czech society for cardiovascular surgery Czech society for interventional radiology Czech diabetology society Czech haematology society
CODE 12530 CODE 12520
facebook.com/diabetickanoha www.stopamputacim.cz