Woolsack fire page 2
Letters to the Editor
page 5
Death of the newspaper page 8
Fleur du Cap Awards page 12
17 March 2009 · Volume 68, Number 3 · 021 650 3543 · varsitynewspaper@gmail.com Photos by Ghia Erica du Plessis
CAMPUS FIRE-
The gutted rooms at Woolsack res were a sorry UKIJV CHVGT C ſTG spread through a number of rooms QP VJG VQR ƀQQT of Court 3. No students or staff were injured. The ECWUG QH VJG ſTG is the focus of an ongoing investigation. See page 2 for the full story.
Row over Admissions Policy BRIAN MULLER IN A JOINT statement issued last week by the South African Students Congress (SASCO) and the African National Congress Youth League (ANCYL), ViceChancellor Dr. Max Price, “a cabal of academic staff members”, Student Representative Council (SRC) President Chris Ryall and Secretary-General Portia Gama have been accused of forming an “Admissions Review Task Team” with the explicit intent of removing race as a proxy for disadvantage and reinstating “proApartheid” admissions policies at the University. The SRC later released a response declaring that the allegations are unfounded, “inaccurate and full of lies” as they were instructed to join the task team
by the Senate, intended to bring the debate to the attention of the student body in April and that it is their “belief that race should not be discarded as a proxy for need.” In an interview with VARSITY, Aphiwe Bewana, SASCO’s Provincial Chairperson, indicated that the task team was created in November 2008 and as of yet nothing has been done to bring the debate to the entire campus. This was “not surprising” as by April data would already have been drafted for submission by the task team. Bewana said, “[he believes] race is still the best way of showing redress” as in accordance with the Higher Educational Act 101 of 1997 (4.37) which states that all institutions should make “appropriate measures for the redress of past inequalities.” Contrary to Bewana’s view that April is too late, Carl Herman,
Admissions Director, believes that “the task team will be enabling the entire UCT community to have a say in the 2011 policy.” Herman’s statement further enforced that the University’s admissions policies are annually approved by Council after “submission to and debate within various structures, including Faculty boards and Senate.” In response to an inquiry from VARSITY, Chris Ryall settled any confusion by reporting that even though the task team had been created in November “the actual task team was only set up two weeks ago when it met for the first time.” Ryall continued to say that it is the SRC’s job to “ensure that [the UCT community’s] voices are heard.” Moonira Khan, Executive Director of Student Affairs, reiterated Herman’s words by asserting that “this particular issue [of
using race or another indicator as a proxy for disadvantage in the South African context as it relates to the admissions policy] has been addressed on several occasions over the past few years” but assures us that “the admission policy of UCT uses race as an indicator and this is still the case.” Most recently the topic of race as a proxy for need fell part of Head of Philosophy, Professor David Benater’s inaugural lecture on Justice, Diversity and Affirmative Action in April 2007 which led to Benatar and the then Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Professor Martin Hall, openly debating the role of race in admissions policies. In response to VARSITY Benatar discloses that he is “not on the task team undertaking the review” but that he has been invited by Acting Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Professor
Varsity, the official student newspaper since 1942, is committed to the principles of equality and democracy
Crain Soudien, to contribute to the debate but has declined the invitation and rather sent a copy of his academic paper Justice, Diversity and Racial Preference: A Critique Of Affirmative Action which has been recently published in the South African Law Journal. In a statement issued to VARSITY on Friday 13 March, the Vice-Chancellor assured everyone that “UCT is committed to finding ways of moving towards non-racialism. It is within this context that the Senate’s Admissions Policy Review Task Team has been constituted. They will review the merits of race as a proxy and of introducing additional indicators of disadvantage. The task team is not working from the premise that UCT should get rid of race as a proxy.”