2010: Edition 10

Page 1

Sports UCT Yatch Club sails into fourth

21 September 2010

Volume 69: Number 10 021 650 3543

varsitynewspaper.co.za

Page 16

twitter.com/varsitynews

New faces in new places

In This Issue Opinions

Proposed ban on pornos causes shock

Page 5

Report Card

THE NEW SCHOOL - The 2011 collective strikes a comical pose for the VARSITY camera. They take office on the 1 November 2010.

Picture by Simone Millward.

SRC reveals fees revolution Olivia Walton LAST FRIDAY UCT management and the SRC presented separate proposals for fees increases to a joint meeting of the University Strategy Forum (USF) and the University Financial Commitee (UFC). The committee was unable to come to a decision and an emergency meeting took place Monday 20 September. The results of this meeting were unavailable at the time of going to press but will be made public this week. The UFC sits each year and hears management’s proposal, presented by Vice-Chancellor Dr Max Price, for an increase in student fees. The SRC President then presents the SRC’s proposal which typically argues that fees should go up as little as possible. The UFC’s decision is then rejected or formalised by the University Council which meets in October. Fees went up an average of 11% in 2009/2010 and 14% in 2008/2009. This year the proposal presented by Price to the UFC and the USF argued for a base increase of 10.5% With the variances in individual faculty increases this base is likely to produce an average fee increase of 12%. Management’s arguments for increasing fees are summarised as follows:

There is excess demand for UCT and the university is able to raise fees without risking a decrease in that demand The increase is in line with increases proposed by other competitive institutions, such as Stellenbosch and Wits. As the best university in the country UCT must preserve the quality of education and needs sufficient funds to do this.

In an interview with VARSITY, SRC President Sizwe Mpofu-Walsh noted that these are “principled” arguments based on an economic assessment of UCT’s finances. The economic argument is based on UCT’s desire to have a surplus of 3% (about R60 million) of the budget at the end of each year. According to Mpofu-Walsh this is set aside for “capital projects such as new residences, contingencies, and strategic projects such as new IT infrastructure”. An increase in fees meets the budget and allows for the surplus. The second economic argument is the need for a continuous cash flow, provided by fees payments at the beginning and middle of each year. The SRC’s proposal disagrees fundamentally with management’s. The primary concern according to Mpofu-Walsh is that for each of the last five years UCT’s revenue

has been an average of R41 million above what was estimated. “This means that somewhere in management’s calculations, they’re not factoring something in,” said Mpofu-Walsh. This year the SRC decided to take on the issue of student fee increases at the level of negotiation and if that fails at the level of protest. Mpofu-Walsh stated that this is “an issue for all students”. Two Masters Economics students were appointed by the SRC in April to conduct research into the fees proposal and to collate the university’s financial data into a report assessing the potential problems with an increase in fees. This report formed the foundation of the proposal presented by Mpofu-Walsh on behalf of the SRC on Friday. It highlights three reasons for reducing the fees increase. Firstly, management is not factoring in increasing student numbers. According to MpofuWalsh this is a “huge problem: UCT doesn’t actually know how many students it’s going to get next year.” The researchers appointed by the SRC have factored in potential enrolment increases. Secondly, the SRC proposed a condition on the fees proposal. They argued that financial aid must go up proportionately to an increase in fees, something that does not currently take place.

Thirdly, the SRC report argues that UCT is too reliant on fees as a source of revenue. Mpofu-Walsh stated that “the university is not doing what it should in terms of alternate sources of revenue”, such as endowments and donations. The SRC argued that such donations should be used “to lessen the load on every student.”

The marks are out

Page 8 & 9

Features

Another problem discussed by the SRC was the conflict between UCT’s admissions policies and its financial policies. “How can you tailor admissions policies to opening up without looking at your financial policies?” asked Mpofu-Walsh, arguing that the financial policies are likely to exclude the same people that the admissions policies are attempting to include. Should the UFC ultimately reject the SRC’s proposal, the SRC’s Fees Revolution campaign will be launched. This will be a program of directed protest action involving no violence or damage to property. “We care about the university and the university needs to see us as equal partners and not just as abstract quantities,” said MpofuWalsh. “We’re confident that if needs be we can create one of the biggest protests that UCT has ever seen.”

Varsity, the official student newspaper since 1942, is committed to the principles of equality and democracy.

Your views on safe sex

Page 10

The VARSITY QR Code To scan a QR code using your phone, point your mobile browser to get.geetagg.com (or use scanlife.com), point and shoot your phone at our block of squiggles using the mobile app, and you’ll be automatically directed to the VARSITY website.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.