30 September 2020 | Volume 79 | Edition 11
Semenya: World Athletics are on “the wrong side of history” Olympic 800-metre champion, Caster Semenya, will be unable to defend her title in Tokyo next year unless she takes hormone suppressants.
Source: The Telegraph
Caitlin MacDonald
O
n Thursday, September 8, Switzerland’s Federal Supreme Court upheld the Court of Arbitration for Sports’ (CAS) defense of World Athletics’ (WA) hormone-regulated eligibility criteria, denying an appeal made by two-time Olympic gold medalist, Caster Semenya. WA’s criteria bars female athletes with above average testosterone levels from competing in specific events. For athletes with differences in sexual development (DSD) this ruling means that they are required to alter their bodies or face exclusion from major sporting events. Following the court’s ruling, Semenya accused the athletics governing body of being on ”the wrong side of history.” “Semenya has been at the nucleus of debates surrounding hormone regulation in sport.” Semenya has been at the nucleus of debates surrounding hormone regulation in sport. Her highly successful arrival on the world stage in 2009 at the age of 18 was marked with controversy, with various athletes and commentators questioning her womanhood and WA administering a sex verification test. Italian runner, Elisa Cusma, who
came sixth in a WA semifinal which Semenya won, said “These kinds of people should not run with us. For me, she is not a woman. She is a man.” Since then, WA has instituted various regulations which limit the amount of testosterone permitted in a competing female athlete’s body. “These kinds of people should not run with us. For me, she is not a woman. She is a man.” WA has asserted that their regulations are necessary for the protection of “the rights of all female athletes to participate on fair and equal terms,” rejecting claims that the requirement for medical intervention or exclusion of athletes with DSD is an infringement upon their rights to dignity and bodily integrity. “[E]xclusion of athletes with DSD is an infringement upon their rights to dignity and bodily integrity.” Sports Scientist, Dr Ross Tucker, refutes this claim, telling Cape Talk that the hormone suppressants DSD athletes are compelled to take “are not innocuous drugs,” citing the
risks of bone health deterioration and cardiovascular complications. In a 2019 press release, Semenya described the medication as making her “feel constantly sick and unable to focus for many years.” In responding to the Supreme Court’s ruling, Semenya firmly rejected the prospect of altering her body, saying “I [...] refuse to let World Athletics drug me or stop me from being who I am.” “Semenya described the medication as making her ‘feel constantly sick and unable to focus for many years.’ ” While Semenya may challenge the Swiss Federal Supreme Court’s ruling in the European Court for Human Rights, this would be costly and time-consuming. For the time being, rights groups such as the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) and the Commission for Gender Equality (CGE) have declared that they will petition the United Nations and African Union for intervention. They maintain that the WA’s rules constitute “gross human rights violations.” Semenya has announced her intention to run the 200 meters in the 2021 Olympic Games in Tokyo, a division that is not covered by hormone regulations.