Varsity
SINCE
1942
THE OFFICIAL STUDENT NEWSPAPER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN
16 April 2013
VOLUME 72: EDITION 5
varsitynewspaper.co.za
@varsitynews
varsitynewspaper
Saturday exams and tests a no-no Jessica Breakey & Krysia Gaweda
T
here has been much debate around UCT Management’s proposed Friday and Saturday examinations and Saturday tests. Independent students, religious students and Students’ Representative Council (SRC) members alike have voiced their concerns. Keenan Hendrickse, SRC Vice President External, expressed his disapproval of the proposed changes. “From an issue of principle, both the proposal for Friday and Saturday tests and exams is an insult to the University's stated goals of transformation,” he stated. With regard to Friday and Saturday exams, Hendrickse expressed how “the main problem is not an issue of not having enough exam days, but rather an issue of exams not being coordinated properly”. In an aim to gather students’ opinions on the proposal, the SRC hosted a Mass Meeting on Tuesday, April 9th. The meeting brought to light an array of mixed emotion. Key issues mentioned included the effects the proposal will have on religious students, issues of public transport, when and where deferred exams would be written as well as finances.
the house unanimously rejected Saturday tests Image: httpcapetowncapades.blogspot.com front page
to commute to UCT. GuattariStafford stated, however, that there are other concerns with regard to developmental agencies, societies and sports clubs. “These are sectors which also affect day students, as many day students feel attached to the university through these activities,” Guattari-Stafford explained. On April 11th, Student Assembly held a Special Meeting where the SRC further discussed the Friday and Saturday exam and Saturday
test proposal. The original motion brought forward by RAG Chairperson, Daniel Sive, suggested that students should have no Saturday exams, but instead two exam sessions on a Friday. These exam sessions should be structured to not interfere with any religious practices. There were amendments from the floor that the morning session should end before noon to accommodate the religious commitments of UCT’s
Muslim community. The second afternoon session should then run from 3pm to 5pm to not interfere with the religious practices of Jewish students. The house then further agreed that the Friday afternoon slot would only be occupied by exam sessions that are two hours. There was no objection to these amendments raised in the assembly. The Student Assembly adopted this amended examination proposal as an official recommendation to the SRC.
IN THIS ISSUE
Thomas Guattari-Stafford, SRC Day Students Co-ordinator, said that there were both pros and cons for the proposal. “As we are all aware, travelling on public transport in the evening is a risk to students' safety,” GuattariStafford said. “By allowing Saturday tests, the university may be able to discontinue tests being written in the evening, thus increasing the safety of the students.” There are approximately 18 000 day students at UCT, the majority of which rely on public transport
However, it was mathematically impossible for the Student Assembly to have a binding decision on the SRC. Only 62% of the house was present and an absolute majority of 66% is needed to make a binding decision. Students at the sitting expressed concern that the decision would not be considered mandatory. The SRC assured students that this amendment concerning examinations would be the stance that they will take to UCT’s Senate. The next proposal brought forward to the floor was Saturday tests. Hendrickse stated that Saturday tests were already in place in certain faculties. However, he said it was an “unsanctioned move” and that the “serious issue has been neglected for many years”. In receiving this news, the house unanimously rejected Saturday tests. SHAWCO Chairperson, Stephen Bourhill, confirmed how Saturday tests would affect societies that used Saturdays for projects and events such as Step programs and Smart programs. The SRC accepted the stance of the house, but has asked students for submissions so they are able to formulate an argument and give concrete reasons to the Senate. Lorne Hallendorff, SRC President, reassured the house that although the SRC is not bound by the house’s decision, the SRC would adopt its stance. All of the 11 SRC members present at the assembly supported the motion brought forward by the house. Hallendorff confirmed that this would be the SRC’s stance at the senate meeting. The SRC President continued to reassure the house that they should not be worried that the members present would change their minds. Students have until the end of April 16th to send in submissions and give reason to the SRC regarding the proposal. The UCT Senate is set to convene on April 19th to vote on the proposal to schedule examination sessions on Fridays and Saturdays as well as Saturday tests.
Twitter wars
PAGE 5
SA at war
PAGE 7
Free speech?
PAGES 8 & 9
Town by day
PAGE 10
UCT Squash
VARSITY, the official student newspaper since 1942, is committed to the principles of equality and democracy.
PAGE 15