2015: Edition 3

Page 1

THE OFFICIAL STUDENT NEWSPAPER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN

24 March 2015

VOLUME 74: EDITION 3

varsitynewspaper.co.za

@varsitynews

The Transformation (R)evolution

varsitynewspaper

IN THIS ISSUE

The “UCT: Rhodes Must Fall” movement officially began on Thursday, March 12th sparked by the actions of a student at the Cecil John Rhodes statue on Monday, March 9th. The movement aims to address institutional racism at UCT and the issue of transformation. Image: Amina Ebrahim

Aisha Abdool Karim, Robyn Ausmeier & Yogi Shoba Institutional Racism

T

he central issue that has been raised by students in recent protests is that of institutional racism, and the concern that UCT perpetuates a system of racial inequality and deep-seated prejudice against black students. Students have stated that their voices are not being heard by the university and that the discourse needs to deepen around the topic of race. When talking to students involved in the protests, it has been emphasised that the movement is in reaction to an experience, black pain, and is not limited to a single incident. According to Masixole Mlandu, a UCT student, “Black pain stems from the deep frustration of black students around where they find themselves in this institution”. In an interview with VARSITY, Mlandu noted that it is important to understand the culture of the institution, and how this culture “perpetuates black assimilation to whiteness”. Due to the structure and makeup of the institution, Mlandu argues that black people feel that they have to behave, dress and speak in a certain way in order to be included in the university culture. Mlandu further stated that the Rhodes statue represents a catalyst which speaks to broader issues around race

and transformation. He stressed that although history cannot be changed, it is possible to choose which symbols represent nation building in the country. “That statue and all of the buildings represent a very psychological effect on black students,” Mlandu notes. Another student, Ezra Mokgope, contends that by preserving a particular history, the university is putting forward a certain message to the students – that not everyone’s history is welcome. Mokgope commented that the institution needs to enhance and embrace a dialogue around black pain. Additionally, he stressed that management should be more accessible to students and should be willing to take part in the conversation. Mokgope also noted that it is important for students to educate themselves on the issues at hand and to ask questions around the legacy that is being put forward at UCT. During an event organised by management on heritage, signage and symbolism, Ramabina Mahapa, SRC President, spoke about the issue of institutional symbolism, questioning whose heritage is being preserved by the university. Mahapa commented that UCT’s institutional culture is “centred around a white, westernised, middle-class, heterosexual male experience” and called for the university to make changes. Linked to discussions on black pain is

the concept of white privilege – referring to the benefits that white people are afforded on the basis of their race and how this manifests itself in the structural oppression of other race groups. On Wednesday, March 18th a group of students hosted the White Privilege Project, an open dialogue event which provided a space for white students to educate other white students about the role they have played in oppression. Explaining white privilege, Nick Fitzhenry noted that “One does not have to be an explicit racist in order to benefit from and perpetuate white privilege”. He commented that white individuals often assume that their experiences are universal, and therefore cast the experiences of others as the exception to the norm. Another speaker, Jessica Breakey, explained how an institution can perpetuate a system of inequality that is based on race, and stated that at UCT a white person is made to feel more comfortable than a black person because of the structure and norms in the university. In addition, Dan Corder, one of the organisers, brought up the issue of white people speaking on behalf of black people, arguing that one cannot begin to speak for someone else’s experiences. “By telling black people what it is like to be black, and telling them how they should feel and act, you rob them of their

voices and you belittle their experiences,” commented Corder. Leadership of Movement The movement calling for transformation at UCT is decentralised and led by students. There is no one leader or organiser of the movement, but rather students are able to address issues which are relevant to them. Students are encouraged to organise their own events, but to date all events are organised by specific members within the movement. Kgotsi Chikane, a member of the movement, said that keeping it decentralised allows “people to express themselves, the way they want to express themselves”. He said that appointing a spokesperson at the beginning of the movement means that one individual might impose their own views on things rather than representing everyone’s views fairly. Chikane said that previous movements had attempted a centralised approach but it “failed to galvanise students” in a way that this movement is able to do. There are no plans to appoint a specific leader and a member said that there were no plans to appoint a spokesperson as it would detract from the decentralised nature of the movement. There are a number of subcommittees within the movement, one of which deals with media.

Continued on Page 3

UCT History

PAGE 2

Parking Discs

PAGE 4

Where My Gays At

PAGE 7

UCT Buildings

Centre

Shock Factor

PAGE 14

My First Rugby Match

PAGE 19

VARSITY, the official student newspaper since 1942, is committed to the principles of equality and democracy.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
2015: Edition 3 by VARSITY - Issuu