William Toohey III | Architecture Portfolio 2017 by William Toohey III

WILLIAM TOOHEY III

ARCHITECTURE PORTFOLIO 2017

WILLIAM TOOHEY III

ARCHITECTURE PORTFOLIO 2017

Published January 25, 2017

williamtooheyiii.com

VC STUDIO VII FALL 2016 4TH YEAR

P4-29

BUAM STUDIO VI SPRING 2016 3RD YEAR

P30-43

MOS STUDIO V FALL 2015 3RD YEAR

P44-55

NH FREELANCE SUMMER 2014 1ST YEAR

P56-69

NYC COMPETITION FALL 2016 4TH YEAR

P70-73

KUKA ELECTIVE FALL 2016 4TH YEAR

P74-79

AFAM STUDIO V FALL 2015 3RD YEAR Contents

P80-83

VERTICAL CORRIDOR | MIT WEST CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

STUDIO |

VII \ FALL 2016 \ 4TH YEAR \ UNDERGRADUATE

TYPOLOGY |

MIXED-USE, HIGH-RISE

LOCATION |

CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS

PROFESSOR | ALBERTO CABRE

PROJECT NARRATIVE A new grand gesture in both vertical and horizontal planes allows for the redirection of MIT’s Infinite Corridor. The proposed master plan is a thoughtful response to Eero Saarinen’s 1954 master plan, the current site context, and MIT’s needs and desires as a leading institution in science and engineering. Identifying 9 concepts visible through the lens of a mid-twentieth century architect allowed for setting the framework for a design process relevant in today’s world with great hopes for the future built environment. After a class-wide site analysis, the current state of West Campus presents a few problems worth solving through architectural intervention: a lack of identity and loosely defined/ underutilized public space. Maintaining awareness of these site problems, in conjunction with MIT’s increasing demand for on-campus living, provided the necessary elements for what led to the proposed master plan. The blending of local landscape with the proposed architecture helps create a new platform for an engaging new dialogue between students and the general public, rewarding the community with new perspectives that contribute to West Campus’s new identity. Vertically-focused architecture within the immediate context of Kresge Auditorium, the MIT Chapel, and the Student Center encourages a new dynamic of social interaction on campus and responds to a spectrum of scales: from city to room. The vertical corridor generates a new and exciting social exchange between the student body and local Cambridge community.

VERTICAL CO

RRIDOR

01 STUDIO VII VERTICAL CORRIDOR 8-9 Axonometric Massing | West Campus Master Plan

01 STUDIO VII VERTICAL CORRIDOR 10-11

Reconstructing Eero Saarinenâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s 1954 master plan served as an investigation into the past for inspiration and clues for a future proposal. Using only a site plan from 1954, this 3-dimensional massing model was constructed and analyzed. A series of perspectives capture views of the master plan never completed by Saarinen.

00 SITE AXONOMETRIC 1954

01 SITE AXES

02 MAJOR NODES

03 PATH + NETWORK

04 VERTICAL SEPARATIONS

2030

DECONSTRUCTING SAARINEN The result of reconstructing the 1954 master plan was the discovery of Saarinen’s 9 concepts. Deconstructing his original site plan, assisted by the newly created 3-dimensional massing model, opened new windows to past intentions for MIT’s West Campus. With an adequate understanding of the past, speculation of the current context and a vision for future West Campus was formulated.

01 07 FRAMED VIEWS

08 CAMPANILE PROCESSION

09 VOLUME + DENSITY

STUDIO VII

06 BLURRING THE LINE

VERTICAL CORRIDOR

05 LANDSCAPE/HARDSCAPE

12-13

SITE AXES + FOOTPRINT OF INTEREST

GESTURES TO CONTEXT

THE MISSING CAMPANILE

PUBLIC AUDITORIUM + EVENT SPACES

PUBLIC MERGES WITH STUDENT LIFE

STUDENT DWELLINGS

Building Diagrams | Constructing a vertical neighborhood

01 STUDIO VII >

ENTRY AT BASE

STUDENT EXPOSITION | GESTURE TO CHARLES >

CREATE THE IN-BETWEEN

PUBLIC AMENITIES + INTERSTITIAL SPACE

VERTICAL CITY SQUARES

VERTICAL CORRIDOR

ACTIVATE WEST CAMPUS @ GROUND PLANE

14-15

1. MIT Athletic Hub 2. Entry A to Pedestrian Bridge 3. Entry B to Pedestrian Bridge 4. Proposed Saarinen Street 5. Plaza A 6. Plaza B 7. Plaza C

10. Entry to Vertical Neighborhood 11. Pedestrian Bridge 12. Kresge Auditorium 13. MIT Chapel 14. MIT Pavilion 15. Proposed One-way Street 16. Memorial Drive

8. Amphitheater 9. Rooftop Plaza

17. Massachusetts Avenue 18. Mass Ave Pedestrian Bridge

The below site plan illustrates the drastic transformation proposed for a future West Campus. An obtrusive row of existing tennis courts currently occupy much of the lower portion of the site, occupying much of where proposed Plaza C (#7) is, as well as across proposed Saarinen Street (#4). The MIT Athletic Hub (#1) is a solution for removing 12 existing, exterior tennis courts and a large inflatable structure currently housing 4 additional courts. Concentrating interior and exterior courts within a smaller footprint results in new opportunities for open plazas and desirable landscaped/ hardscaped zones. Thoughtful considerations of the temporal quality of the site inspired a vision for seasonal transformations that would maintain West Campusâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s positive atmosphere year-round. For example, Plaza A (#5) has the ability to transform from a studious summer lawn to a winter wonderland, filled with activities like public skating for the community during winter months.

3 10

12 1

8 7

14 15

Proposed Site Plan 16

16-17

VERTICAL CORRIDOR

STUDIO VII

Plaza A | Winter Conditions

13 1

12 1

11 1

1 10

9 1

1 8 1

6 7

Site Sections | Tying into existing fabric

4 3

1. Vertical City Squares 2. Pedestrian Bridge 3. Amphitheater 4. Student Exposition 5. Rooftop Plaza

6. Flexible Event Space 7. Main Entry Lobby 8. Private 3-Level Dwelling 9. Public Interstitial Space 10. Entry to Vertical Neighborhood

11. 4-Core Elevator Shaft 12. 7-Story Segment of Internal Corridor 13. 4-Story Segment of Internal Corridor 14. MIT Pavilion 15. MIT Athletic Hub

18-19

VERTICAL CORRIDOR

STUDIO VII

Late-night Stroll | Mass Ave Pedestrian Bridge

EAST CAMPUS

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

MAIN CAMPUS

CHARLES RIVER

01 STUDIO VII Urban Section A-A

VERTICAL CORRIDOR

WEST CAMPUS

Urban Section B-B

20-21

BOSTON

1. Between the Columns | View from Building 7 2. Partial | Sectional Volume Study 3. Full | Sectional Volume Study

22-23

VERTICAL CORRIDOR

STUDIO VII

PUBLIC MINGLE

Public Space

Vertical City Square

CAMBRIDGE OBSERVATORY

VERTICAL NEIGHBORHOOD

EL. 700’ - 0”

Public Space

3-Story Dwelling

2-Story Dwelling

1-Story Dwelling

24-25

VERTICAL CORRIDOR

STUDIO VII

Building Section | Understanding scale, structure + hierarchy

01 SCALE: CHAIR IN A ROOM

04 SCALE: ENVIRONMENT IN A CITY PLAN

02 SCALE: ROOM IN A HOUSE

“Always design a thing by considering it in its next larger context - a chair in a room, a

STUDIO VII

room in a house, a house in an environment, an environment in a city plan.” - Eliel Saarinen

Chair to City | Considerations through various scales

26-27

VERTICAL CORRIDOR

03 SCALE: HOUSE IN AN ENVIRONMENT

01 STUDIO VII VERTICAL CORRIDOR 28-29

A series of conceptual perspectives are used to understand scale, space, and qualities of daylighting. Interior renderings help illustrate volumetric relationships and connections between levels. Exterior renderings explore various vantage points from new plazas, birdâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s-eye views, and neighboring structures.

30-31

Fishâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s-eye View | Charles River VERTICAL CORRIDOR

STUDIO VII

BOSTON UNIVERSITY ART MUSEUM

STUDIO |

VI \ SPRING 2016 \ 3RD YEAR \ UNDERGRADUATE

TYPOLOGY |

MUSEUM

LOCATION |

BROOKLINE, MASSACHUSETTS

PROFESSOR | THOMAS LESKO, ARCHITECT

PROJECT NARRATIVE Given Albert Kahn's Peter Fuller Building at 808 Commonwealth Avenue as a canvas for design, the objective for this project was to renovate the ground level and supplement it with a new addition. These new and revitalized spaces would create the Boston University Art Museum. Understanding the surrounding context was a critical factor during the conceptual phase. The site's location at a physical intersection where layers of circulation and activity exist inspired the direction for design. Utilizing what the building already has to offer, there was an increasing desire to link external site forces through internal phenomena. Exposing movement and creating a holistic system of paths throughout the interior became a driving force behind the form and function of the museum.

TEAM MEMBERS |

QIANG WANG

(M.ARCH 2018)

EPIC STUDIO | EXTERNALLY COL-

JACOB SPRINGER

(M.ARCH 2018)

LABORATIVE, PROJECT-BASED,

TYLER SOM-DUBREUIL

(BINT 2016)

INTERDISCIPLINARY CURRICULA

GRACE SANTOS

(BINT 2016)

[ PRESENTED AT AIANH AWARD NIGHT / 2016 ]

B U A M

COMM

808

ONWE ALTH AVENU E

Site Plan | Proposed + Existing Building Footprint

RAMP GALLERY

SOUTH GALLERY

02 >

DOUGHNUT GALLERY

EAST GALLERY

BUAM

PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC

STUDIO VI

CONTINUOUS LOOP OF CIRCULATION

MBTA

MASS TURNPIKE

34-35

SURFACE STREETS

BUAM

STUDIO VI

1. Atrium Connector | Final Iteration 2. Parametric Study | Alternative Design Option 3. Parametric Study | Alternative Design Option

36-37

1. East Facade | Old to New Connection 2. Private Student Library 3. Commonwealth Ave. Entry

38-39

BUAM

STUDIO VI

1. BU Entry 2. Ramp Gallery 3. Administrative Office 4. BU Theater Lobby 5. BU Theater 6. South Gallery 7. Open Offices

12. Public Restrooms 13. East Gallery 14. Administrative Cafe 15. Administrative Lobby 16. Private Elevator 17. Administrative Lobby 18. Atrium Connector

8. Vertical Circulation 9. Office Bridge 10. Public Gathering 11. Hall to Elevator

19. Private Collections 20. Exterior Garden 21. BU Library (beyond) 22. Commonwealth Ave.

6 10 11

1 4 5

16 17

02 STUDIO VI BUAM 9

18 6 19 20 11

Building Sections | Rendered by Jacob Springer

40-41

02 STUDIO VI G

BUAM

Floor Plans | 5 Levels | Rendered by Qiang Wang

42-43

North Elevation

East Elevation

South Elevation

West Elevation

02 STUDIO VI BUAM 44-45

Axonometric View | Connecting Old to New

MUSEUM OF THE SENSES

STUDIO |

V \ FALL 2015 \ 3RD YEAR \ UNDERGRADUATE

TYPOLOGY |

MUSEUM

LOCATION |

BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS

PROFESSOR | AARON WEINERT, ARCHITECT, AIA, NCARB

PROJECT NARRATIVE The Museum of the Senses provides visitors with dynamic entry sequences, contemplative sensory

on. The sensory galleries give the user time to reflect and encourage new discoveries to be made with oneself at a phenomenological level. The interior “galleries” do not display art, rather they create spaces that allow the user to become increasingly aware of one’s own state of being in a place. Relying on daylighting to surround the core of the museum allows the galleries take on a life of their own without electric lighting, focusing more on the user than the architecture. Primary vertical circulation exists between two monolithic surfaces, allowing visitors to ascend to the sensory spaces, emerging from below. Public to private program is organized in a gradient from west to east, respectively, and the use of a perforated building skin emphasizes the public/private relationships throughout the museum. The overarching intent was to create a meaningful sequence through centralized, sensory program that utilizes surrounding light and support space.

[ FEATURED IN WENTWORTH ARCHITECTURE REVIEW / V7 ] [ AWARDED AIANH ARCHITECTURE FOUNDATION SCHOLARSHIP / 2016 ]

MOS

galleries, and interior/exterior social gathering spaces, rewarding all with a journey worth embarking

N TO YLS BO IA ST.

CAMBR

N TO YLS BO

ST.

SITE

IA ST.

CAMBR

ST.

SITE

IA ST.

CAMBR

48-49

MOS

STUDIO V

03 STUDIO V

Skin

Glass

MOS

Mullions

Concrete 4

1. The Approach | St Cecilia Street 2. Massing Model | West Elevation 3. Massing Model | North Elevation 4. Massing Model | Southwest Elevation

50-51

Columns

1. Theater Lobby 2. Theater Stage 3. Dressing Rooms 4. Egress Stair 5. Cambria St. Stair 6. Entry Passageway

7. Contemplative Pool 1 8. Contemplative Pool 2 9. Public Plaza 10. Ticket Desk 11. Main Lobby 12. Multi-functional Space

13. Kitchen 14. Bar/Serving 15. Cafe 16. Men’s Restroom 17. Women’s Restroom 18. Receiving/Shipping

19. Sensory Gallery 1 20. Conference Room 21. Administrative Offices 22. Sensory Gallery 2 23. Administrative Cafe 24. Men’s Restroom

䐀一

唀倀

25. Women’s Restroom 26. Sensory Gallery 3 27. Stair to Roof Level 28. Public Restrooms 29. Covered Roof Level 30. Rooftop Vestibule

䐀一

唀倀

䐀一

26 27

䐀一

30 䐀一

唀倀

䐀一唀倀

Floors Plans | 6 Levels

唀倀

䐀一

13 7

唀倀

10 6

䐀一䐀一

䐀一唀倀

17 20

03 STUDIO V 29

MOS

52-53

Building Section A-A

Building Section B-B

03 STUDIO V MOS 54-55

Conceptual Sketches

1. The Ascent | Main Stair 2. Shifted Planes | Sensory Gallery 2 3. Primary Circulation | Sequence

structural mullions

STUDIO V

glass canopy

steel + concrete beam

alucobond metal skin

reinforced waffle slab

MOS

curtain wall system

exposed structural column

transparent railing suspended ceiling polished concrete floor egress stair

white finish on plaster

dark wood flooring

56-57

NEW HAMPSHIRE RESIDENCE

TYPOLOGY |

SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING

STATUS/SIZE |

PROJECT: COMPLETE \ 2,400SF +/-

LOCATION/YEAR |

SOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE \ 2014

CLIENT |

NEWLYWEDS \ LATE-TWENTIES

PROJECT NARRATIVE I was hired as the sole designer for a residential project in Southern New Hampshire. Challenges of an existing footprint, cost, time, and additional variables made this an exciting first commission. Making design decisions, meeting with professional builders and engineers, and producing sufficient construction documents to obtain a building permit were all rewarding experiences during this real world application. The only components that stood on this site before the design were three main foundation walls and a concrete slab.

NH RESIDENCE

Living Room Views | Construction Progress 2014.10.12

Marker Rendering of North Elevation

04 DWELLING NH RESIDENCE 60-61

Site Plan | Proposed Building Footprint

Material Local reclaimed timbers were utilized for fireplace mantle piece and door trim at entry to lower ground level.

View from Living Room to Kitchen + Hall

04 NH RESIDENCE

DWELLING Kitchen | View to North

62-63

Kitchen | View to West

The Approach | Construction Progress 2014.10.12

Truss to Sky | Construction Progress 2014.10.12

64-65

View from Northeast Drive NH RESIDENCE

DWELLING

existing proposed

Level G | Floor Plan

04 DWELLING NH RESIDENCE 66-67

View to Full Bathroom | Construction Complete

24'-10"

5" 6'-88

35'-2"

5" 6'-108

11'-23 4"

35'-2"

1" 9'-112

10'-8"

1" 10'-02

10'-0"

PATIO 23'421" x 10'-0"

4'-0"

4'-6"

LIVING ROOM 23'-6" x 14'-9"

5'-0"

RAISED HEARTH

1" 7'-102

3'-0"

2'-8"

BATHROOM

DOWN

7'-6"

2'-4"

3'-8"

1" 17'-108

3'-0"

2'-8"

12'-8"

5'-10"

24'-0" 2'-2"

5'-53 4"

6'-8"

HVAC

2'-8"

CLOSET 2'-0" x 3'-6"

2'-8"

2'-2"

PANTRY

4'-8"

DEN 15'-5" x 11'-434"

1" 5'-52

ATTIC HATCH UP

4'-6"

KITCHEN

6'-17 8"

OFFICE 13'-9" x 9'-11"

4 3

6'-0"

B 24'-0"

Level 1 | Floor Plan

VEL ONE PLAN

1/4" = 1'-0"

CLOSET 5'-10" x 1'-10"

26'-0"

DINING AREA 8'-7"

7'-941" x 11'-434"

7'-67 8"

1" 10'-58

7'-67 8"

1" 10'-58

18'-0"

36'-0"

04 DWELLING NH RESIDENCE 68-69

Master Bedroom Vaulted Ceiling + Non-structural Reclaimed Timbers | Construction Complete

A 36'-0"

1" 6'-12

3'-10"

1" 6'-12

1" 5'-42

2'-53 4"

1" 4'-04

2'-8"

3'-10"

3'-7"

3'-4"

3'-8"

2'-8"

CHIMNEY FLUE 3'-0" x 4'-0"

2'-0"

3'-0"

11'-4"

BEDROOM 2

SLOPED

6'-0"

8'-6" x 9'-0"

DOWN

MASTER BEDROOM

ATTIC HATCH 1'-8"

24'-0"

2'-8"

STACKED W/D

24'-0"

23'-6 ' x 12'-0"

1 2

5'-8"

2'-8"

12'-0"

15'-5" x 17'-4"

MASTER CLOSET

BATHROOM

SLOPED

8'-6" x 6'-0"

2'-8"

12'-8"

7'-6"

HVAC

BEDROOM 3 7'-4" x 15'-5"

15'-5' x 5'-4"

ENCLOSED GLASS SHOWER 3'-0" x 5'-0"

8'-0"

9'-0"

2'-8"

MASTER BATH

B 7'-67 8"

8'-681"

1'-11"

1" 8'-68

1'-11"

18'-0"

7'-67 8"

18'-0"

36'-0"

LEVEL TWO PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

Level 2 | Floor Plan

04 DWELLING NH RESIDENCE 70-71

Southeast Corner | Construction Complete

NEW YORK CITY MUSEUM | CIVIL RIGHTS + SOCIAL JUSTICE

COMPETITION | FALL 2016 \ 4TH YEAR \ UNDERGRADUATE TIMELINE |

SEPTEMBER 2016 - NOVEMBER 2016

TYPOLOGY |

MUSEUM

SIZE |

130,000SF +/-

LOCATION |

LIBERTY ISLAND, NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK

ADVISORS |

CAROL BURNS, ARCHITECT, FAIA, LEED AP \ MICHAEL MACPHAIL, ARCHITECT \ TROY PETERS, ARCHITECT, LEED AP

TEAM MEMBERS | QIANG WANG

(M.ARCH 2018)

3D Visualization

PAUL ARDUINI

(M.ARCH 2018)

by Paul Arduini

[ HONORABLE MENTION / RANKED 6 /268 ]

PROJECT NARRATIVE | â&#x20AC;&#x153;The Fracture through The Fightâ&#x20AC;? The monolithic volume that rests on the site represents the people of the cause for social justice and civil rights; constantly surrounded by external pressure from society. A subterranean element organized with a procession of depiction galleries is seen rising, wrapping, cutting and fracturing the form, creating a powerful contrast between the two major programs of depiction and activism. The overall composition of the Liberty Museum represents a holistic group of people bruised and fractured by violence and injustice but through strength and perseverance can remain standing through devastating hardship. The Fracture becomes a reminder of the scars left behind by tyranny and oppression, but the voids are cloaked in light and transparency to symbolize healed wounds of a determined group of activists constantly engaging in The Fight.

Depressing the existing ground plane creates opportunities for new and exciting green-spaces within the context and is instrumental in reducing total building/lot coverage. An open-air theater, landscaped zones, and various types of gathering spaces are choreographed along the procession to the museum. Exhibits for depiction follow a subterranean procession that ramps up past the existing ground plane around the south and west facades. Public program with activism spaces exist within the main volume seen from afar. Circulation terminates at the northwest corner, rewarding panoramic views to Lower Manhattan and the Statue of Liberty. The Liberty Museum succeeds in responding to a complex site context and harnesses a unique and modest aesthetic for not only New York City but the world.

NYC LIBERTY MUSEUM

3D Visualization by Paul Arduini

74-75

FALL 2016

NYC LIBERTY MUSEUM

KUKA ROBOTIC ARM | AUTOMATED PROCESSES

ELECTIVE |

FALL 2016 \ 4TH YEAR \ UNDERGRADUATE

TOPIC |

COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN

LOCATION |

BOSTON, MA + HYPOTHETICAL SITES

PROFESSOR | AUSTIN SAMSON, DESIGNER, SCI-ARC M.ARCH 2014

PROJECT NARRATIVE With the addition of the Kuka Robotic Arm to Wentworth’s Architecture Department during the summer of 2016, this elective course aimed to explore, design, and fabricate “end-of-arm” tools that would be used long term as tools for fabrication with the robotic arm. Our team chose to develop a brick gripper and explore opportunities for using computational design to generate brick walls using the robotic arm. We 3D-modeled in Rhino and used Grasshopper to animate the wall’s construction. We spent most of our time in Grasshopper testing several variations of the brick wall; the wall could be driven by patterns, images, signal waveforms, lofted curves, and more.

TEAM MEMBERS | JASON HASKO

(M.ARCH 2018)

DYLAN BUSH

(M.ARCH 2018)

STEFAN BURNETT

(M.ARCH 2018)

Axonometric View | From Hopper to Wall

78-79

KUKA ROBOTIC ARM

FALL 2016

Visualization | Crit Room Installation

80-81

KUKA ROBOTIC ARM

FALL 2016

AMERICAN FOLK ART MUSEUM

STUDIO |

V \ FALL 2015 \ 3RD YEAR \ UNDERGRADUATE

ARCHITECT |

TOD WILLIAMS + BILLIE TSIEN

TYPOLOGY |

MUSEUM

SIZE |

40,000SF

LOCATION |

NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK

PROJECT YEAR | CONSTRUCTED 2001 \ DEMOLISHED 2014 PROFESSOR |

AARON WEINERT, ARCHITECT, AIA, NCARB

PROJECT NARRATIVE The American Folk Art Museum by Tod Williams & Billie Tsien served as a precedent study for this 3rd year design studio. A thoughtfully designed museum that no longer exists today had once utilized its 40’ x 100’ site on 45 and 47 West 53rd Street in Midtown Manhattan. Openings for daylighting, shifting of floor plates, rich materials, public/private organization, and folk art being a major proponent of the process were all qualities of this commendable project. Further analysis into the building’s organization and additional research for documentation gave ample opportunity to construct a 3D model using the software Rhinoceros 5 and plan a scaled physical model with the assistance of James T. Fan, a wood shop, and a laser cutter.

TEAM MEMBER | JAMES T. FAN

(BSA 2017)

bli

iva

â&#x20AC;&#x2122;s

STUDIO V

pa n

84-85

AMERICAN FOLK ART MUSEUM

EDUCATION WENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS | SEPTEMBER 2013 - APRIL 2018 Cumulative GPA: 3.78 /4.00 | Architecture GPA: 3.83 /4.00 Anticipated Graduation 2017 | Bachelor of Science in Architecture [BSA] Anticipated Graduation 2018 | Master of Architecture [M.Arch]

EXPERIENCE ARROWSTREET INC. | BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS | ARCHITECTURAL INTERN | MAY 2016 - AUGUST 2016 Architectural intern among 70+ architects and designers in the heart of Boston’s Financial District | Member of retail design team, assisting with construction documents and construction administration | Worked on construction documents for Providence Place Mall renovation, paying close attention to parking garage entrances | Received, logged, forwarded, organized, and reviewed submittals/RFIs and drafted SKs | Drafted detailed sections for a large egress stair in order to ensure architectural and structural accuracy | Communicated directly with structural engineer, GC team members, and other consultants during construction phase | Participated in construction progress meeting, walked site, and interacted with GC team members and consultants | Responsible for drafting 2D details and 3D modeling in Autodesk Revit| 511.25 Approved NCARB hours TMS ARCHITECTS | PORTSMOUTH, NEW HAMPSHIRE | ARCHITECTURAL INTERN | JUNE 2014 - DECEMBER 2015 Architectural intern at 16-person firm with a wide variety of project types | Worked directly with principals and project managers during major design stages | Utilized SketchUp and Adobe Photoshop during schematic design for massing and presentations | Sketched on-site and documented existing conditions in Vectorworks | Studied city/town codes and regulations during early design stages | Designed presentation layouts and was responsible for marketing tasks | Played a key role in revitalizing office-wide computer resources to improve work efficiency | Worked on construction documents for residential and commercial projects | Assisted with construction administration for 208,000 sf student housing development for the University of New Hampshire | Proposed design for two-story, detached garage for lakeside residence | 953.25 Approved NCARB hours FREELANCE DESIGNER | DOVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE | MAY 2014 - JUNE 2014 Executed critical aspects of design process for 2400+ sf residence | Led meetings with client and relevant professionals | Produced construction documents and obtained building permit | Project status: completed

SKILLS

[ COMPUTER + HUMAN ]

ACHIEVEMENTS/AWARDS

[ ACADEMIA + COMPETITION + PUBLICATION ]

27th Annual Associated Schools of Construction Design-Build Competition | 1st Place /6 Alfred T. Granger Student Art Trust Fund Scholarship | 2013 - 2017 American Institute of Architects New Hampshire Architecture Foundation Scholarship | 2015 - 2016 Archasm International Design Competition for NYC Museum | Honorable Mention | 6th Place /268 Robert C. & Lucille N. Gilman Architecture Scholarship | 2013 Wentworth Architecture Review | Published Design Projects | WAr V6 2016 | WAr V7 2017 Wentworth Institute of Technology Endowed Scholarship | 2016 - 2017 Wentworth Institute of Technology Undergraduate Scholarship | 2013 - 2017 Wentworth Institute of Technology Merit Scholarship | 2013 - 2017 Wentworth Institute of Technology Dean’s List | 2013 - 2016 | 6 /7 Semesters

EXTRACURRICULAR AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTURE STUDENTS | GENERAL MEMBER | 2014 - CURRENT FORUM 2016 WORKSHOP LEADER FOR “INTRO TO PARAMETRIC DESIGN” | AUTODESK DYNAMO | 2-HOUR WORKSHOP | 20-25 STUDENTS Responsible for planning workshop and creating a digital presentation for students to follow along with | Worked with Autodesk professionals to gain a sufficient understanding of Dynamo and what best fit the occasion for a predominantly architectural student audience ASSOCIATED SCHOOLS OF CONSTRUCTION DESIGN-BUILD COMPETITION | SPONSORED BY KIEWIT BUILDING GROUP 27TH ANNUAL ASC COMPETITION 2016 | ALBANY, NEW YORK | OCTOBER 2016 | 1ST PLACE Team of six students [construction management + architecture] 2-day event comprised of fulfilling needs of an RFP and delivering a graphical and oral presentation on a hypothetical proposal to a panel of judges MISSION HILL HEALTH MOVEMENT Group effort within Wentworth’s Department of Business Management + Facilities Management to assist a local non-profit organization Conducted a brief marketing analysis and proposed new strategies for the betterment of the organization | social media as major proponent

William is a hands-on, detail-oriented, and self-motivated individual who is passionate about architecture and what the profession has to offer. He devotes most of his time and energy to his education at Wentworth Institute of Technology and is eager to develop as a professional; this is fueled by an unyielding and rigorous approach to problem-solving and a desire to positively impact the built environment. William has received institutional and international recognition for studio design projects and external design competitions, respectively. Likely to graduate with a Bachelor of Science in Architecture with High Honors (Magna Cum Laude), as of April 2017, William will remain in Boston to pursue his Master of Architecture degree at Wentworth Institute of Technology. His passion for design, attentiveness, and constantly evolving skill set differentiates him from many of his peers. He has collaborated with designers, architects, and clients in professional settings since May 2014: working with TMS Architects in Portsmouth, New Hampshire and Arrowstreet Inc. in Bostonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Financial District. William hopes to work with many more team members as he pursues his first major career goal of becoming a licensed architect.

Thank You.

t: 603.973.9152 e: tooheyw@wit.edu w: williamtooheyiii.com