Roads ACT 27 March 2012 Document No. 60240482RPTRA003_2
Black Spot Feasibility Study Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
AECOM
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
Black Spot Feasibility Study Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
Prepared for Roads ACT
Prepared by AECOM Australia Pty Ltd Level 2, 60 Marcus Clarke Street, Canberra ACT 2600, Australia T +61 2 6201 3000 F +61 2 6201 3099 www.aecom.com ABN 20 093 846 925
27 March 2012
60240482
AECOM in Australia and New Zealand is certified to the latest version of ISO9001 and ISO14001.
© AECOM Australia Pty Ltd (AECOM). All rights reserved. AECOM has prepared this document for the sole use of the Client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other party should rely on this document without the prior written consent of AECOM. AECOM undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document. This document has been prepared based on the Client’s description of its requirements and AECOM’s experience, having regard to assumptions that AECOM can reasonably be expected to make in accordance with sound professional principles. AECOM may also have relied upon information provided by the Client and other third parties to prepare this document, some of which may not have been verified. Subject to the above conditions, this document may be transmitted, reproduced or disseminated only in its entirety.
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
AECOM
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
Quality Information Document
Black Spot Feasibility Study
Ref
60240482
Date
27 March 2012
Prepared by
Leigh Palmer, Margo Aziz & Michael Jollon
Reviewed by
Tim Rampton
Revision History Authorised
Revision Date
Details
1
16-Mar-2011
Draft Report
2
27-Mar-2012
Final Report
Revision
Name/Position
Signature
Tom Brimson Technical Director Tom Brimson Technical Director
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
AECOM
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
Table of Contents Executive Summary 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Overall Objective 1.2 Project Tasks 2.0 Comprehensive Crash Analysis 2.1 Crash Data Analysis 2.2 Crash diagram 2.3 Traffic Characteristics 2.3.1 Intersection / Road Geometry 2.3.2 Traffic Volume 2.3.3 Traffic Speed 2.3.4 Public Transport 2.3.5 Bicycles and Pedestrians 2.3.6 Land Use 3.0 Site inspection 4.0 Development of Remedial Measures 4.1 Objectives 4.2 Constraints 4.3 Opportunities for Remedial Measures 4.4 Opportunities to Improve Existing Deficiencies 5.0 Improvement Options 5.1 Option 1 a – Reduce Hindmarsh Drive to Two through Lanes at the Intersection 5.1.1 Physical Description 5.1.2 Cost 5.1.3 Potential Crash Reduction 5.2 Option 1 b – Reduce Hindmarsh Drive to Two through Lanes at Eggleston Crescent and at Launceston Street 5.2.1 Physical Description 5.2.2 Cost 5.2.3 Potential Crash Reduction 5.3 Option 2 – Median Closure on Hindmarsh Drive 5.3.1 Physical Description 5.3.2 Cost 5.3.3 Potential Crash Reduction 5.4 Option 3 –Close Intersection and Signalise Hindmarsh Drive / Launceston Street / McDonald Street Intersection 5.4.1 Physical Description 5.4.2 Cost 5.4.3 Potential Crash Reduction 6.0 Analysis and Recommendation 6.1 Options Comparison 6.1.1 Expected Crash Reductions 6.1.2 Economic Analysis 6.2 Improvements to Correct Existing Deficiencies 6.2.1 Relocate Give – Way Warning Sign on Northbound Eggleston Crescent 6.2.2 Existing Deficiencies Summary 6.3 Recommendation Appendix A Crash Data for the ACT (2007 - 2010)
i 1 2 2 3 3 6 7 7 8 8 8 9 9 10 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 13 13 14 14 14 14 15 15 15 15 16 16 17 17 17 17 21 22 22 22 A
List of Tables Table 1 Table 2 Table 3
Number of Crashes by severity and year Crash Factor Matrix Major Crash Types
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
3 4 5
AECOM
Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7 Table 8 Table 9 Table 10 Table 11 Table 12 Table 13
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
Estimated Percentage Reduction in crashes from Option 1 Estimated Percentage Reduction in crashes from Option 2 Estimated Percentage Reduction in crashes from Option 1 Crash Costs in the Australian Capital Territory Crash Cost by Severity in the Australian Capital Territory Benefit/Cost Analysis for Single-Location Options Benefit/Cost Analysis for Two-Location Options Summary of Benefit to Cost Analysis Level of Risk Existing Deficiency Summary
13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 21 22
Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection Crash Diagram Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection ACTION Weekday Bus Service Walking and Cycling Facilities at Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection Option 1 a – Lane reduction on Hindmarsh Drive Option 1 b – Lane reduction on Hindmarsh Drive Option 2 – Median Closure on Hindmarsh Drive at the Intersection Option 3 – Intersection closure and signalisation of Hindmarsh Drive / Launceston Street / McDonald Street intersection
1 6 7 8 9 12 13 14
List of Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
16
AECOM
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
Executive Summary Background Roads ACT have commissioned AECOM Australia Pty Ltd to undertake 7 black spot crash studies in the ACT. These studies included 4 intersections and 3 midblock locations. These investigations examined the most recently available five year crash history for each site to ascertain the contributory factors and develop remedial measures for each site. The ACT Road Safety Strategy for 2011 – 2020 aims to meet a national goal of at least a 30% reduction in fatalities and serious injuries by 2020. Providing safe roads and roadsides is one component of an integrated approach to meet this goal. Our study will provide the ACT Government with a range of cost effective and safe upgrade options which will allow for informed recommendations to be made. The aim of the project is to Identify the contributory factors associated with crashes at the site. Identify any features seen during site inspections, which may adversely contribute to crashes at this location. Develop potential remedial measures. Evaluate the effectiveness of these remedial measures. Select and recommend the most appropriate measure(s). This report focuses on the intersection of Hindmarsh Drive and Eggleston Crescent.
Crash Analysis The recorded crashes were obtained from Roads ACT for the five year period from January 2006 until December 2010. The records indicate that 32 crashes have occurred at the intersection of Hindmarsh Drive and Eggleston Crescent. Of these crashes, 4 were injury crashes and the rest were property damage only crashes. This intersection experienced an annual average of 6.4 crashes. The range has varied from 5 to 9 crashes per annum. The greatest number of crashes was rear-end collisions. Of the 32 crashes, 4 (12.5%) were casualty crashes. The ACT annual average casualty rate at a Give Way control over the 4 year period 2007 – 2010 was 6.4%. In respect to casualties, this intersection fares worse than the average Give Way control (details outlined in Appendix A).
Options Analysis As a result of the crash analysis and a review of existing deficiencies found on site, the following improvement options were assessed: -
Option 1 a – Reduce Hindmarsh Drive to two through lanes at the intersection.
-
Option 1 b – Reduce Hindmarsh Drive to two through lanes at Eggleston Crescent and at Launceston Street
-
Option 2 – Median closure on Hindmarsh Drive
-
Option 3 – Close the intersection and install new signalised cross intersection at Hindmarsh Drive / Launceston Street / McDonald Street.
An obscured Give-Way Warning sign on northbound Eggleston Crescent was identified as an existing deficiency. Each option was allocated an indicative implementation cost and assessed for potential crash reduction savings. The results of the cost benefit analysis are summarised in Table A.
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
i
AECOM
ii
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
Table A
Summary of Benefit to Cost Analysis
OPTION
Treatment
Cost
B/C Ratio
NPV
OPTION 1 a
Lane reduction of Hindmarsh Drive at the Eggleston Crescent
$94,000
2.66
$210,765
OPTION 1 b
Lane reduction of Hindmarsh Drive at the Eggleston Crescent and Launceston Street
$230,000
2.09
$337,305
OPTION 2
Median closure with let turn deceleration / acceleration lanes
$122,000
3.54
$419,354
OPTION 3
Closure of the subject intersection with installing new signalised intersection at Hindmarsh Dr. / Launceston St. / MacDonald St
$370,000
0.58
-$209,491
The benefit to cost analysis indicates that each option yields benefits in excess of its costs. Option 1 a and 1 b, reducing through lanes, and Eggleston Crescent and possibly at Launceston Street are both viable options. Option 2, median closure, is not viable because of the effect it would have on Chifley residents. Options 3, road closure and signalisation, is effective, however high costs keep it from meeting the black spot program economic criteria. The potential crash risk of the identified existing deficiency was evaluated using road safety audit principles. The results are summarised in Table B.
Table B
Existing Deficiency Summary
DEFICIENCY
RISK
TREATMENT
COST ESTIMATE
Hidden Give-Way Warning Sign
Low
Relocate Sign
$500
Recommendation Option 1 b, reducing through lanes at Eggleston Crescent and Launceston Street is recommended because it offers effective crash reductions for two intersections, and it maintains consistency and driver expectations. It is worth noting that the Austroads Guide to Traffic Management (Part 3) states that the maximum carrying capacity of a lane to maintain a Level of Service (LOS)‘C’ is 1280 veh/hr/lane. The current peak hour volume on this section of Hindmarsh Drive is approximately 2,300 per hour in the peak direction (across three lanes). With the proposed reduction in traffic lanes from three to two between Eggleston Crescent and Launceston Street, this would equate to around 1,200 veh/hr/lane – within the LOS C criteria. However, slight delays are likely to occur at the merge points of the corridor, so careful consideration will need to be given as to their location. The Give –Way warning sign on Eggleston crescent should be relocated to improve intersection legibility and reinforce priority.
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
AECOM
1.0
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
1
Introduction
Roads ACT have commissioned AECOM Australia Pty Ltd to undertake 7 black spot crash studies in the ACT and this included 4 intersections and 3 midblock sections. These investigations examined the most recently available five year crash history for each site to ascertain the contributory factors and develop remedial measures for each site. The following sites were examined. Intersections 1.
Sandford Street / Gungahlin Drive
2.
Athllon Drive / Fincham Crescent
3.
Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent
4.
Kingsford Smith / Spalding Street
Midblock road sections 5.
Monaro Highway – between Hindmarsh Drive and Lanyon Drive
6.
Challis Street – between Cape Street and Morphett Street
7.
Aikman Drive – between Emu Bank and Townsend Place
This report is one of seven studies and presents the findings and recommendations for the intersection of Hindmarsh Drive and Eggleston Crescent. This intersection is located in Chifley. The intersection is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1
Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
Source; ACTMAPi - ACT Government online interactive maps
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
AECOM
1.1
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
Overall Objective
The ACT Road Safety Strategy for 2011 – 2020 aims to meet a national goal of at least a 30% reduction in fatalities and serious injuries by 2020. Providing safe roads and roadsides is one component of an integrated approach to meet this goal. Our study will provide the ACT Government with a range of cost effective and safe upgrade options which will allow for informed recommendations to be made. The aim of the project is to: Identify the contributory factors associated with crashes at the site Identify any features seen during site inspections, which may adversely contribute to crashes at this location Develop potential remedial measures Evaluate the effectiveness of these remedial measures Select and recommend the most appropriate measure(s)
1.2
Project Tasks
The crash investigations include the following tasks: A comprehensive crash analysis using Roads ACT crash data base for the five year period from January 2006 until December 2010 Development of a crash matrix Development of a crash diagram Development of potential countermeasures Assessment of those countermeasures Selection and recommendation of the preferred countermeasure Summary and conclusions
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
2
AECOM
3
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
2.0
Comprehensive Crash Analysis
2.1
Crash Data Analysis
The recorded crashes were obtained from Roads ACT for the five year period from January 2006 until December 2010. These crashes were reviewed to identify any crash patterns and trends and also assist in the understanding of the contributory causes of the crashes. Ambiguities and coding errors were discovered in some of the crash data. These records were reinterpreted using engineering judgement and consideration of the crash patterns in the intersection. The records indicate that 32 crashes have occurred at the intersection of Hindmarsh Drive and Eggleston Crescent. Of these crashes, 4 were injury crashes and the rest were property damage only crashes as shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Severity
Number of Crashes by severity and year
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
2010
Fatal Admitted to Hospital Received Medical Treatment
1
1
1
1
4
Property Damage Only
5
4
8
4
7
28
Total
5
5
9
5
8
32
A crash factor matrix has been prepared and is shown in Table 2.
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
AECOM
Crash Factor Matrix
Key Direction
WB
107
Hindmarsh Dr
WB
202
Hindmarsh Dr
WB
Hindmarsh Dr
WB
Eggleston Cres
NB
Hindmarsh Dr
WB
Eggleston Cres
NB
Hindmarsh Dr
EB
Eggleston Cres
NB
304
Hindmarsh Dr
WB
306
Hindmarsh Dr
WB
804
Hindmarsh Dr
WB
1
1 2
2
2
4
3
2
4
1
1
4
3
4
4
Wet
Dry
West
2 1
1
South
North
2010
2009
2008 1
1
4 4
3
1
Type of Day Weekday Peak Period
Dark
Hindmarsh Dr
Light Conditions
Day
104
Surface
Total 2007
On Street
2006
DCA Code
Other Direction
Public Holiday School Holiday Week ends Week days
Year of Crash
East
Table 2
4
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
1
1
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
3
2
1
1
1
6
3
1
1 1
301 2
1
3
1
1
3 1
3
3
1
1
1
8
5
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
302 1
1
3
1
2
1
1
8
8
2
2
3
2
303
Total
1
1 1
1 1 5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 9
5
8
32
18
6
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
0
7
30
2
25
1
1 1
1
21
9
1 7
0
4
7
AECOM
Table 3
5
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
Major Crash Types
Description and DCA Code
Adjacent Approach (101-109)
Total
6
Head – on (201)
Opposing turns (202206)
Rear-end (301-304)
Lane change (305-307)
4
20
1
Parallel lanes – turning (308,309)
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
Vehicle hits Pedestrian (001-003)
Loss of control, L or R turns (706,707)
Hit parked / parking vehicle (601,401,402
Other Total
1
32
AECOM
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
Analysis of crash details reveals the following: -
20 crashes out of total 32 were rear-end crashes.
-
6 crashes were adjacent approach crashes and 4 crashes involved opposing turns
-
21 crashes occurred during a weekday, 9 were in peak hours.
-
The majority of crashes occurred in good weather and during daylight.
-
There were zero crashes involving pedestrians.
2.2
Crash diagram
Figure 2
Crash Diagram
: Injury
Analysis of crash diagram reveals the following: -
2 injury crashes involved adjacent approach vehicles and the other two involved opposing turn vehicles.
-
12 crashes out of total 20 rear-end crashes involved northbound traffic on Eggleston Crescent.
-
The majority of crashes involved the left turn movements out of Eggleston Crescent and the right turn movements into Eggleston Crescent.
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
6
AECOM
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
2.3
Traffic Characteristics
2.3.1
Intersection / Road Geometry
7
Hindmarsh Drive Hindmarsh Drive is an arterial road running east-west across the southern suburbs of the ACT. It connects Weston Creek to the Woden Valley, Narrabundah and Fyshwick. Hindmarsh Drive is a 6 lane divided carriage way at its intersection with Eggleston Crescent. The pavement width at its intersection with Eggleston Crescent is about 11 metres on each carriageway. Eggleston Crescent Eggleston Crescent is a major collector road in Chifley connecting Hindmarsh Drive to Melrose Drive. It is a two lane undivided road. At its intersection with Hindmarsh Drive the pavement width is about 16 metres. Intersection The intersection is a seagull arrangement controlled by a give way sign on Eggleston Crescent. Right turn movements out of Eggleston Crescent have a dedicated lane on Eggleston Crescent but have no acceleration lane on Hindmarsh Drive. Right turn movements out of Hindmarsh Drive have a turn lane on Hindmarsh Drive. Slip lanes are provided for left turns as shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3
Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
Source; ACTMAPi - ACT Government online interactive maps
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
AECOM
2.3.2
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
8
Traffic Volume
No traffic counts near this intersection were discovered. Traffic counts on Hindmarsh Drive east of Melrose Drive were reported in Roads ACT’s traffic volume report for the period 2005 – 2007. These counts indicate average volumes of 23,000 weekday vehicles. Midblock peak hour volumes on Hindmarsh Drive were found to be approximately 2,300 veh/hr in the peak direction (Eastbound in the AM and Westbound in the PM) No traffic counts were found for Eggleston Crescent.
2.3.3
Traffic Speed
The signposted speed limits on the roads approaching the intersection are as follows: -
80 km/h on Hindmarsh Drive
-
60 km/h on Eggleston Crescent
Traffic speed data was not available for this report.
2.3.4
Public Transport
Many Action weekday bus services travel through the intersection go to and from the Woden Bus Interchange. Hindmarsh Drive carries routes 25, 75, 227, 26, 62,162, 23, 24 and Xpresso 749. Eggleston Crescent carries routes 23 and 24 (both routes turning through the intersection). There are no bus stops located near the intersection. The nearest bus stop is located on Eggleston Crescent about 270 metres south as shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4
ACTION Weekday Bus Service
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
AECOM
2.3.5
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
Bicycles and Pedestrians
On street cycle lanes and a shared use path are provided on Hindmarsh Drive. Foot paths are provided on both Hindmarsh Drive and Eggleston Crescent as shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5
Walking and Cycling Facilities at Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
Source: ACT Walking and Cycling Map Legend:
2.3.6
On road Cycle Lane,
Shared Path,
Foot path
Land Use
There is no direct residential access on Hindmarsh Drive. Eggleston Crescent provides direct access to residential properties.
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
9
AECOM
3.0
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
10
Site inspection
A weekday site inspection was undertaken on Tuesday, 31 January 2012 at 4.00 pm. The following observations were noted: -
The majority of turning movements at the intersection are right turn movements into Eggleston Crescent and left turn movements out of Eggleston Crescent (in the PM)
-
Many drivers turning right into Eggleston Crescent use Eggleston Crescent to connect to other Woden Valley suburbs via Macfarland Crescent.
-
The intersection warning sign (Give Way ahead) on Eggleston Crescent is hidden by a tree; however the intersection is clearly visible.
-
Sight distance is adequate at the intersection.
-
A long queue on the left turn movement out of Eggleston Crescent was observed.
-
There was little to no queuing on right turn movement out of Eggleston Crescent.
-
Drivers turning right into and out of Eggleston Crescent may misjudge the gap crossing three lanes which are travelling at 80 km/h.
-
The sight lines of vehicles in the left turn lane out of Eggleston Crescent can be obscured by vehicles turning right. This may result in hesitation and may be a factor in rear-end crashes.
The Give Way warning sign is obscured by a street tree.
The largest turning movements are left turns out and right turns into Eggleston Crescent.
A long queue develops in left turn bay out of Eggleston Crescent.
The right turn out of Eggleston Crescent is not very heavy.
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
AECOM
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
4.0
Development of Remedial Measures
4.1
Objectives
11
The key objective in developing safety measures is to reduce the number and/or severity of crashes. The reduction in severity or total trauma is often best done by reducing the potential for right angle crashes.
4.2 -
Constraints Hindmarsh Drive is a heavily trafficked arterial road connecting Weston Creek through to Fyshwick. It has three lanes in either direction It has an 80km/h speed limit
-
Eggleston Crescent is a heavily trafficked major collector road providing access to Chifley and direct property access to houses.
-
The surrounding land is established residential neighbourhoods. The solution should remain within the road reserve. (Hindmarsh Drive reserve is approximately 57 metres.)
4.3
Opportunities for Remedial Measures
The key type of crash at Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent is rear-end crashes (60%); however injuries at the intersection involved adjacent approach crashes and opposing turn crashes. The following remedial measures were considered as possible opportunities to reduce the number and/or severity of these key crashes: -
Reduce Hindmarsh Drive to two through lanes at the intersection.
-
Close the median on Hindmarsh Drive at the subject intersection.
-
Close the subject intersection and install cross signalised intersection at Hindmarsh Drive / Launceston Street / McDonald Street.
4.4
Opportunities to Improve Existing Deficiencies
On northbound Eggleston Crescent, a warning sign is hidden by a tree. This sign should be relocated to a position before the tree.
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
AECOM
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
5.0
Improvement Options
5.1
Option 1 a – Reduce Hindmarsh Drive to Two through Lanes at the Intersection
5.1.1
Physical Description
12
This option provides a lane reduction on westbound Hindmarsh Drive by converting the left hand through lane to a left turn deceleration lane before Eggleston Crescent and a left turn acceleration lane out of Eggleston Crescent. This will simplify gap identification for drivers turning right in or right out of Eggleston Crescent as the crossing will be reduced to two lanes as shown in Figure 6. The proposed treatment would reduce the adjacent approach crashes as well as the rear-end crashes experienced turning left out of Eggleston Crescent. (Left and centre through lanes on Hindmarsh Drive should be merged before the intersection to avoid a trap lane condition.)
Figure 6
5.1.2
Option 1 a – Lane reduction on Hindmarsh Drive
Cost
The estimate of probable cost to install this treatment is $94,000 excluding GST. No detailed design or assessment of the existing hardware or underground services has been undertaken.
5.1.3
Potential Crash Reduction
Lane reduction of Hindmarsh Drive at the intersection is expected to have the following impact on crash frequency:
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
AECOM
Table 4
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
13
Estimated Percentage Reduction in crashes from Option 1
Target Crash
Assumed Crash Reduction
Reference
Adjacent approach crash (crash codes 101-109)
10%
RTA 2005, Accident Reduction Guide Part 1, table C1 Page 70
Opposing turn (crash codes 202-206)
15%
RTA 2005, Accident Reduction Guide Part 1, table C1 Page 70
Rear-end crash (crash codes 301-304)
60%
RTA 2005, Accident Reduction Guide Part 1, table C1 Page 70
Lane change crash (crash codes 305 – 307)
40%
RTA 2005, Accident Reduction Guide Part 1, table C1 Page 70
5.2
Option 1 b – Reduce Hindmarsh Drive to Two through Lanes at Eggleston Crescent and at Launceston Street
5.2.1
Physical Description
AECOM completed a previous black spot feasibility study at the Hindmarsh Drive / Launceston Street intersection for which none of the considered measures generated benefits greater than costs. The Hindmarsh Drive / Launceston Street intersection is located about 400 m west from the subject intersection. This treatment takes into consideration the two black spot sites. This treatment would include: -
lane reduction and deceleration and acceleration lanes on westbound Hindmarsh Drive at Eggleston Crescent (as in Option 1 a)
-
similar lane reduction and auxiliary lanes in eastbound Hindmarsh Drive at Launceston Street
Similar lane reductions have been at unsignalised t-intersections on Melrose Drive in Phillip. The proposed treatment would reduce the total number of key crashes occurring at both intersections of Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent and Hindmarsh Drive / Launceston Street. Added benefits of treating the two black spot locations include reinforcing driver expectation by installing similar treatments for adjacent similar intersections, and capitalising on mobilisation costs.
Figure 7
Option 1 b – Lane reduction on Hindmarsh Drive
It is worth noting that the Austroads Guide to Traffic Management (Part 3) states that the maximum carrying capacity of a lane to maintain a Level of Service (LOS)‘C’ is 1280 veh/hr/lane. The current peak hour volume on this section of Hindmarsh Drive is approximately 2,300 per hour in the peak direction (across three lanes). With the proposed reduction in traffic lanes from three to two between Eggleston Crescent and Launceston Street, this
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
AECOM
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
14
would equate to around 1,200 veh/hr/lane – within the LOS C criteria. However, slight delays are likely to occur at the merge points of the corridor, so careful consideration will need to be given as to their location.
5.2.2
Cost
The estimate of probable cost to install this treatment is $230,000 excluding GST. No detailed design or assessment of the existing hardware or underground services has been undertaken.
5.2.3
Potential Crash Reduction
Lane reductions on Hindmarsh Drive at Eggleston Crescent and at Launceston Street are expected to impact crash frequency with the same reductions indicated in Option 1 a (see Table 4). For this option, the reductions would apply to the crash history at each intersection.
5.3
Option 2 – Median Closure on Hindmarsh Drive
5.3.1
Physical Description
This treatment prevents right turn movements into and out of Eggleston Crescent by closing the median on Hindmarsh Drive as shown in Figure 8. Hindmarsh Drive would be reduced to two through lanes as detailed in Option 1. The proposed treatment would reduce the number and / or severity of all key crashes; however it would seriously impact access for Chifley residents.
Figure 8
Option 2 – Median Closure on Hindmarsh Drive at the Intersection
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
AECOM
5.3.2
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
15
Cost
The estimate of probable cost to install this treatment is $122,000 excluding GST. No detailed design or assessment of the existing hardware or underground services has been undertaken.
5.3.3
Potential Crash Reduction
Median closure on Hindmarsh Drive is expected to have the following impact on crash frequency:
Table 5
Estimated Percentage Reduction in crashes from Option 2
Target Crash
Assumed Crash Reduction
Reference
Adjacent approach crash (crash codes 101-109)
100%
Austroads 2009, Guide to Road Safety Part 8
Opposing turn (crash codes 202-206)
100%
Austroads 2009, Guide to Road Safety Part 8
Rear-end crash 60% Engineering Judgement* (crash codes 301-304) *; Due to unavailability of some assumed reductions related to the proposed treatment, assumed crash reduction was applied based on engineering judgement.
5.4
Option 3 –Close Intersection and Signalise Hindmarsh Drive / Launceston Street / McDonald Street Intersection
5.4.1
Physical Description
This treatment closes the Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent intersection; opens McDonald Street to Hindmarsh Drive, and signalises the resulting cross intersection of Hindmarsh Drive / Launceston Street / McDonald Street. This treatment takes into consideration both the Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent intersection and the Hindmarsh Drive / Launceston Street intersection. It would reduce the severity and number of key crashes occurring at both Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent and Hindmarsh Drive / Launceston Street. The proposed treatment is shown in Figure 9.
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
AECOM
Figure 9
5.4.2
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
16
Option 3 – Intersection closure and signalisation of Hindmarsh Drive / Launceston Street / McDonald Street intersection
Cost
The estimate of probable cost to install this treatment is $500,000 excluding GST. No detailed design or assessment of the existing hardware, underground services, or intersection performance (SIDRA) has been undertaken.
5.4.3
Potential Crash Reduction
Closure of the subject intersection and signalisation of a new cross intersection at Hindmarsh Dive / Launceston Street / McDonald Street is expected to have the following impact on crash frequency:
Table 6
Estimated Percentage Reduction in crashes from Option 1
Target Crash
Assumed Crash Reduction
Reference
Adjacent approach crash (crash codes 101-109)
70%
Austroads 2009, Guide to Road Safety Part 8
Opposing turn (crash codes 202-206)
45%
Austroads 2009, Guide to Road Safety Part 8
Rear-end crash (crash codes 301-304)
40%
RTA 2005, Accident Reduction Guide Part 1, table C1 Page 70
Lane change crash 45% Engineering Judgement* (crash codes 305 – 307) *; Due to unavailability of some assumed reductions related to the proposed treatment, assumed crash reduction was applied based on engineering judgement. P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
AECOM
6.0
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
17
Analysis and Recommendation
At the intersection of Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent, the following options were assessed: -
Option 1 a – Reduce Hindmarsh Drive to two through lanes at the intersection.
-
Option 1 b – Reduce Hindmarsh Drive to two through lanes at Eggleston Crescent and at Launceston Street
-
Option 2 – Median closure on Hindmarsh Drive
-
Option 3 – Close the intersection and install new signalised cross intersection at Hindmarsh Drive / Launceston Street / McDonald Street.
6.1
Options Comparison
6.1.1
Expected Crash Reductions
Expected crash reductions were tabulated by applying reductions available from road safety literature to the 5year crash experience in the intersection. Where crash reductions were not available through research, engineering judgement and experience were used to determine potential benefits. Only crashes of the particular type identified through literature or by engineering judgment, and on the correct approach to be affected by the option, were considered targeted crashes for reduction. The results are detailed in the “Target Crashes” and “Assumed Reduction” columns in Table 9 and Table 10, below. Option 1 a, reducing Hindmarsh Drive to two through lanes at the intersection would reduce adjacent approach crashes (codes 101-109) by 10%, opposing turn crashes (codes 202-206) by 15%, rear-end crashes (codes 301 – 304) by 60% and lane change crashes (codes 305 – 307) by 40%. Option 1 b, reducing Hindmarsh Drive to Two through Lanes at Eggleston Crescent and at Launceston Street, would reduce total crashes at both Hindmarsh Drive intersections with Eggleston Crescent and Launceston Street. Benefit-cost analysis was conducted based on the 5-year crash history at both intersections. The treatment would reduce total adjacent approach crashes (codes 101-109) by 10%, opposing turn crashes (codes 202-206) by 15%, rear-end crashes (codes 301 – 304) by 60% and lane change crashes (codes 305 – 307) by 40%. Option 2, median closure and lane reduction on Hindmarsh Drive would reduce adjacent approach crashes (codes 101-109) by 100%, opposing turn crashes (codes 202-206) by 100% and rear-end crashes by 60%. Option 3, closure of the subject intersection and creation of a new signalised intersection at Hindmarsh Drive / Launceston Street / MacDonald Street will reduce total crashes at both Hindmarsh Drive intersections with Eggleston Crescent and Launceston Street. Benefit-cost analysis was conducted based on the 5-year crash history at both intersections. The treatment would reduce total adjacent approach crashes (codes 101-109) by 70%, total opposing turn crashes (codes 202-206) by 45%, rear-end crashes (codes 301 – 304) by 40%, and lane change crashes (codes 305 – 307) by 45%.
6.1.2
Economic Analysis
The 2011 crash costs were obtained from Roads ACT to develop an economic analysis of the costs and benefits of Black Spot improvements. Crash cost by crash type was used for costing future crashes. When crash types were encountered that did not have indicative costs; the cost of an average property damage crash was substituted in the analysis. The crash costs are summarised in Table 7and Table 8.
Table 7
Crash Code 101-109 201 202-206 301 – 304
Crash Costs in the Australian Capital Territory
Crash Description
Cost per Crash
Intersection, adjacent approaches
$ 35,265
Head-on
$ 138,301
Opposing vehicles; turning
$ 32,584
Rear-end
$ 19,909
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
AECOM
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
Crash Code
Crash Description
18
Cost per Crash
305 – 307
Lane change
$ 21,557
001 – 003
Vehicle hits pedestrian
$ 163,946
706 – 707
Loss of Control (L or R turns)
$ 82,427
401 – 402
Hit parked vehicle
$ 21,586
601
Hit parked vehicle
$ 23.675
Overtaking
$ 28,113
Fell from moving vehicle
$ 70,222
501 – 506 901
Table 8
Crash Cost by Severity in the Australian Capital Territory
Severity Fatal
Cost per Crash $2,314,504.00
Serious Injury
$381,099.00
Minor Injury
$60,173.00
Property Damage Only
$18,096.00
The present-day value of the expected costs and benefits over a 10-year project life for each option were analysed. The results are detailed in Table 9 and Table 10, below.
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
AECOM Table 9
Discount rate
7%
Median Closure with Left Turn Deceleration / Acceleration Lanes
Years of Crash Data
5
Initial Cost of Treatment
Initial Cost of Treatment
Assumed Project Life
10
Annual Maintenance
Head-on
202-206
Opposing vehicles; turning
301 - 304 305 - 307
Annual Maintenance
$6,100 Discounte d Benefits
201
$122,000
Assumed Reduction
Intersection, adjacent approaches
$4,700
Target Crashes
101-109
$94,000
Discounte d Benefits
Crash Description
Cost of Crashes
Crash Code
Assumed Reduction
OPTION 2
Reduce Hindmarsh Drive to Two Through Lanes at the Intersection
Target Crashes
OPTION 1 a
Cost per Crash
Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Street
Total Crashes
LOCATION:
19
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection Benefit/Cost Analysis for Single-Location Options
$ 35,265
$211,590
$ 138,301
0
4
$ 32,584
$130,336
4
15%
27,463
4
100%
$183,085
Rear-end
20
$ 19,909
$398,180
16
60%
268,468
18
60%
302,038
Lane change
1
$ 21,557
$21,557
1
40%
12,113
0
6
001 - 003
Vehicle hits pedestrian
$ 163,946
706 - 707
Loss of Control (L or R turns)
$ 82,427
0
401 - 402
Hit parked vehicle
$ 21,586
0
601
Hit parked vehicle
$ 23.675
0
501 - 506
Overtaking
$ 28,113
0
901
Fell from moving vehicle
$ 70,222
0
$18,086
$18,086
Other
1
TOTAL
32
$779,749
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
6
10%
$29,772
2
100%
$99,075 $0
27
$337,776
24
$584,198
B/C Ratio
NPV
Discounted Costs
B/C Ratio
NPV
Discounted Costs
2.66
$210,765
$127,011
3.54
$419,354
$164,844
AECOM Table 10
Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Street
OPTION 1 b
OPTION 3
Reduce Hindmarsh Drive to Two Through Lanes Eggleston Cr. & Launceston St.
Intersection Closure and new signalisation at Hindmarsh Dr. / Launceston St. / MacDonald St
Years of Crash Data
5
Initial Cost of Treatment
Initial Cost of Treatment
Assumed Project Life
10
Annual Maintenance
Crash Description
101-109
Intersection, adjacent approaches
16
$ 35,265
$525,520
201
Head-on
0
$ 138,301
0
202-206
Opposing vehicles; turning
6
$ 32,584
200,982
6
15%
$42,348
585,480
30
60%
493,460
2
40%
21,587
10%
$73,821
Target Crashes
Discounte d Benefits
Crash Code
16
Annual Maintenance
6
$25,000
70%
$
Discounte d Benefits
$11,500
$500,000
Assumed Reduction
$230,000
Assumed Reduction
Cost of Crashes
Target Crashes
7%
Cost per Crash
Discount rate
Total Crashes
LOCATION:
20
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection Benefit/Cost Analysis for Two-Location Options
$208,057 $0
4
45%
$82,388
301 - 304
Rear-end
30
$ 19,909
305 - 307
Lane change
2
$ 21,557
38,418
001 - 003
Vehicle hits pedestrian
$ 163,946
0
$0
706 - 707
Loss of Control (L or R turns)
$ 82,427
0
$0
401 - 402
Hit parked vehicle
$ 21,586
0
$0
601
Hit parked vehicle
$ 23.675
0
$0
501 - 506
Overtaking
$ 28,113
0
$0
901
Fell from moving vehicle
$ 70,222
0
$0
$18,086
88,950
$0
Other
5
TOTAL
59
$1,439,350
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
54
$648,076
10
$290,445
B/C Ratio
NPV
Discounted Costs
B/C Ratio
NPV
Discounted Costs
2.09
$320,444
$310,771
0.58
-$209,491
$499,936
AECOM
21
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
The results of the cost benefit analysis are summarised in Table 11.
Table 11
Summary of Benefit to Cost Analysis
OPTION
Treatment
Cost
B/C Ratio
NPV
OPTION 1 a
Lane reduction of Hindmarsh Drive at the Eggleston Crescent
$94,000
2.66
$210,765
OPTION 1 b
Lane reduction of Hindmarsh Drive at the Eggleston Crescent and Launceston Street
$230,000
2.03
$320,444
OPTION 2
Median closure with let turn deceleration / acceleration lanes
$122,000
3.54
$419,354
OPTION 3
Closure of the subject intersection with installing new signalised intersection at Hindmarsh Dr. / Launceston St. / MacDonald St
$370,000
0.58
-$209,491
The benefit to cost analysis indicates that the option with greatest Benefit Cost Ratio is Option 2, closure of the median in Hindmarsh Drive. This option reduces many of the crashes in the intersection, and would reduce severity most effectively. The option would significantly reduce access for the suburb of Chifley. Option 1 a, through lane reduction yields crash reductions valued at over two times its cost for the Eggleston Crescent intersection, Option 1 b, offers a similar return on investment is for the nearby Launceston Street intersection. These options are relatively low cost, and they reduce right angle crashes and have the strongest effect on rear-end crashes. Option 3, closure of Eggleston Crescent and signalisation at Launceston Street is effective against the most severe right angle crashes at both intersections, however it is more costly to implement. This option does preserve access for both neighbouring suburbs.
6.2
Improvements to Correct Existing Deficiencies
In the event that no improvement option is determined through the economic analysis required by the black spots program, the potential crash risk of existing deficiencies can be evaluated using road safety audit principles. The probable frequency of crash occurrence resulting from each deficiency is rated from improbable to highly probable. The severity of crashes resulting from the deficiency is rated as minor, moderate or major. Level of risk is assigned by a matrix. Improbable crash frequencies which result in minor or moderate severity are considered low level of importance. The level of risk matrix is detailed in Table 12.
Table 12
Level of Risk
Severity
Crash Frequency Highly Probable
Occasional
Improbable
Major
High
High
Medium
Moderate
High
Medium
Low
Minor
Medium
Low
Low
Risks should be corrected or minimised when cost of treatment corresponds or is less than the risk level presented by the deficiency: low level risks should be corrected if the treatment cost is low; medium level risks should be corrected if the treatment cost is medium or lower; and high level risks should be corrected if the treatment cost is high, medium or low.
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
AECOM
6.2.1
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
22
Relocate Give – Way Warning Sign on Northbound Eggleston Crescent
On northbound Eggleston Crescent, the Give-Way warning sign is hidden by large tree. It is not likely that the hidden warning sign causing frequent crashes, however the lack of a warning may result in minor crashes involving property damage. This issue presents a low level of risk. Low risk deficiencies should be corrected in cases where the treatment cost of correcting the deficiency is also low. The order of cost to relocate the warning give-way sign is $500 excluding GST.
6.2.2
Existing Deficiencies Summary
The existing deficiencies and treatments are summarised in Table 13.
Table 13
Existing Deficiency Summary
DEFICIENCY
RISK
TREATMENT
COST ESTIMATE
Hidden Give-Way Warning Sign
Low
Relocate Sign
$500
6.3
Recommendation
At the intersection of Hindmarsh Drive and Eggleston Crescent, four treatments were proposed and analysed for crash reduction abilities and cost-effectiveness: Option 1 a, lane reduction and auxiliary lanes at Eggleston Crescent; Option 1 b, lane reduction and auxiliary lanes at Eggleston Crescent and Launceston Street; Option 2, lane reduction and median closure at Eggleston Crescent; and Option 3, closure of the intersection at Eggleston Crescent, and signalisation of a new intersection at Hindmarsh Drive / Launceston Street / McDonald Street. Options 1a and 1 b are recommended as viable candidates for implementation. Option 1 b is recommended because it offers similar crash reductions to two intersections, and it maintains consistency and driver expectations. It is worth noting that the Austroads Guide to Traffic Management (Part 3) states that the maximum carrying capacity of a lane to maintain a Level of Service (LOS)‘C’ is 1280 veh/hr/lane. The current peak hour volume on this section of Hindmarsh Drive is approximately 2,300 per hour in the peak direction (across three lanes). With the proposed reduction in traffic lanes from three to two between Eggleston Crescent and Launceston Street, this would equate to around 1,200 veh/hr/lane – within the LOS C criteria. However, slight delays are likely to occur at the merge points of the corridor, so careful consideration will need to be given as to their location. Option 2, median closure, is an effective measure, however closing the median would result in a major loss of access for Chifley residents. Option 3 reduces total crashes occurring at the Eggleston Crescent and Launceston Street intersections with Hindmarsh Drive. It is, however, more costly to implement and crash reduction benefits do not outweigh costs sufficiently to make it a strong contender among black spot projects. The existing deficiencies in the intersection should be corrected based on the potential risk identified using road safety audit principles. The Give –Way warning sign on Eggleston crescent should be relocated to improve legibility at the intersection and reinforce priority.
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
AECOM
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
This page has been left blank intentionally.
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
23
AECOM
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
Appendix A
Crash Data for the ACT (2007 - 2010)
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
AECOM
Appendix A
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
A-1
Crash Data for the ACT (2007 - 2010)
CRASH DATA for the ACT (2007 - 2010)
Total Crashes by Severity + Traffic Control Type (2007-2010) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Traffic Control Unknown Uncontrolled Control Not Operated Traffic Lights Give Way Sign / Roundabout Stop Sign Police School Crossing Marked Pedestrian Crossing Other TOTAL
PD 205 14513 49 6746 6059 845 28 20 275 191 28931
Injury 7 1171 3 319 400 66 4 3 35 10 2018
Fatal 0 38 0 5 11 0 0 0 1 0 55
Sub Totals 212 15722 52 7070 6470 911 32 23 311 201 31004
% of total crashes 2.73% 202.58% 0.67% 91.10% 83.37% 11.74% 0.41% 0.30% 4.01% 2.59% 399.48%
% of Injury / Fatal 3.30% 7.69% 5.77% 4.58% 6.35% 7.24% 12.50% 13.04% 11.58% 4.98% 6.69%
Source: multiple publications - see below
Total Crashes by Severity and Traffic Control Type (2010) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Traffic Control Unknown Uncontrolled Control Not Operated Traffic Lights Give Way Sign / Roundabout Stop Sign Police School Crossing Marked Pedestrian Crossing Other TOTAL
PD 1 3599 7 1535 1650 182 5 3 71 49 7102
Injury 0 374 1 105 125 16 1 1 14 6 643
Fatal 0 10 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 16
Sub Totals 1 3983 8 1642 1779 198 6 4 85 55 7761
% of total crashes 0.01% 51.32% 0.10% 21.16% 22.92% 2.55% 0.08% 0.05% 1.10% 0.71% 100.00%
Source: '2010 Road Traffic Crashes in the ACT', Traffic Management and Safety, April 2011
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
% of Injury / Fatal 0.00% 9.64% 12.50% 6.52% 7.25% 8.08% 16.67% 25.00% 16.47% 10.91% 8.49%
AECOM
Black Spot Feasibility Study - Hindmarsh Drive / Eggleston Crescent Intersection
A-2
Total Crashes by Severity and Traffic Control Type (2009) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Traffic Control Unknown Uncontrolled Control Not Operated Traffic Lights Give Way Sign / Roundabout Stop Sign Police School Crossing Marked Pedestrian Crossing Other TOTAL
PD 3 3272 3 1918 1812 201 8 3 60 32 7312
Injury 0 300 0 77 101 28 0 2 6 2 516
Fatal 0 9 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 11
Sub Totals 3 3581 3 1996 1914 229 8 5 66 34 7839
% of total crashes 0.04% 46.14% 0.04% 25.72% 24.66% 2.95% 0.10% 0.06% 0.85% 0.44% 101.01%
% of Injury / Fatal 0.00% 8.63% 0.00% 3.91% 5.33% 12.23% 0.00% 40.00% 9.09% 5.88% 6.72%
Source: '2009 Road Traffic Crashes in the ACT', Traffic Management and Safety, April 2010
Total Crashes by Severity and Traffic Control Type (2008) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Traffic Control Unknown Uncontrolled Control Not Operated Traffic Lights Give Way Sign / Roundabout Stop Sign Police School Crossing Marked Pedestrian Crossing Other TOTAL
PD 122 3400 22 1566 1422 215 6 6 61 37 6857
Injury 3 223 1 57 60 7 0 0 7 0 358
Fatal 0 8 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 14
Sub Totals 125 3631 23 1625 1486 222 6 6 68 37 7229
% of total crashes 1.61% 46.79% 0.30% 20.94% 19.15% 2.86% 0.08% 0.08% 0.88% 0.48% 93.15%
% of Injury / Fatal 2.40% 6.36% 4.35% 3.63% 4.31% 3.15% 0.00% 0.00% 10.29% 0.00% 5.15%
Source: '2008 Road Traffic Crashes in the ACT', Traffic Management and Safety, May 2009
Total Crashes by Severity and Traffic Control Type (2007) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Traffic Control Unknown Uncontrolled Control Not Operated Traffic Lights Give Way Sign / Roundabout Stop Sign Police School Crossing Marked Pedestrian Crossing Other TOTAL
PD 79 4242 17 1727 1175 247 9 8 83 73 7660
Injury 4 274 1 80 114 15 3 0 8 2 501
Fatal 0 11 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 14
Sub Totals 83 4527 18 1807 1291 262 12 8 92 75 8175
% of total crashes 1.07% 58.33% 0.23% 23.28% 16.63% 3.38% 0.15% 0.10% 1.19% 0.97% 105.33%
P:\CBR\60240482_Blackspot_Feas\8. Issued Docs\8.1 Reports\60240482RPTRA003_2 Hindmarsh Dr _ Eggleston Cr .docx Revision 2 - 27 March 2012
% of Injury / Fatal 4.82% 6.30% 5.56% 4.43% 8.99% 5.73% 25.00% 0.00% 9.78% 2.67% 6.30%