Architecture Technology by Joey Xu

A R C H TECTURE TECHNOLOGY

JOEY

MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE

2 0 1 9 - 2 0 2 1

FACTS Location: Manhattan, New York Design Wind Load: 60psf Design Deflection Ratio: 1/175 Material: extruded aluminum Dimension: 60ft W x 146ft H Lot: interior lot Zone: R10/C1-9 Tech: low E coating, acid etching Cost: $300/sf

SUPERIMPOSED ZIGZAG GSAPP Advanced Curtain Wall Critic: Robert Heintges Spring 2020

This is a unitized curtain wall system which has the benefit of fast installation, flexibility, and quality assurance. All insulated glazing units incorporate a low E coating to minimize solar gain. Some IGUs are acid etched on the number one surface to make up the facade pattern. The curtain wall design contains two systems, the zigzag part and flat part. The alternating systems create a contrasting, diverse patterns on the facade. The zigzag part creates an angular facade that enhances the three-dimensional appearance from the exterior and provides inside users two angled views similar to that of a bay window. In the afternoon, users can shade the south-west facing window using a blind while leaving the south-east window unblocked. The extended sill at curtain wall stack joints can also be used as benches for the newly created triangular spaces. The flat parts are comprised of typical planar curtain wall units. The verticality of the units will be emphasized by creating a wider exterior mullion framing profile.

Elevation

South Ea

60 ft

10 F

146 ft

ast View

South West View

32 8

3 21

3 41

4 21

8 87

3 41

8 83

CONCRETE-GLASS FACADE GSAPP Facade Detailing Critic: Kevin Schorn Collaboration with Jacob Hu

Spring 2021

In this project, we will be detailing a facade system we designed in our houring project. Since we would like to give residents the choice of having their units facing the roads or courtyards, we proposed an alternating typology for the building. It created a design challenge because we need to coordinate structure, units, and envelope. Water resistance, insulation, and light qualities are considered when developing the enclosure detail.

Insulated Glass Unit

SKYSCRAPER ENCLOSURE GSAPP Super Tall Critic: Nicole Dosso Spring 2021

This class took a deep dive of the super tall building typology, researching a skyscraper’s structure mechanical, enclosure maintenance, life safety, and vertical transportation system. My project focuses on building enclosure, start with a insulated glass unit and is assembled to curtain wall panels, then attaching it to the building. Construction and maintenance is also considered due to its size. Building maintenance units and window washing tracks are integrated to the design as well.

Curtain Wall Dimension

Building Size

4 way joint back view

4 way joint front view

Horizontal Mullion phase 1

Horizontal Mullion phase 2

CONVECTOR COVER FINISHED FLOOR

3/8 IN F.T. GLASS 1/8 IN MULLION GASKET

ANCHOR SMOKE BARRIER ALUM. BACK PAN MINERAL WOOL RIGID INSULATION

ROLL UP SHADE GYP. WALL BOARD SHADER TRACK

W24 BEAM SPRAY FIRE PROOF AIR RETURN

GREEN POINT THEATRE a revit project

GSAPP Architecture Technology IV Instructor: Sarah Khan Collaborator: Zach B. Hao C. Marci S.

Fall 2019

100% Construction Document

No.

Description

01 02 03

Schematic Design Design Development Construction Document

10. 10. 11.

18 Greenpoint Ave, Brooklyn NY, 11222

91 We

Ar HC, MS, 212 XXX

WIP Architects, DPC 1172 Amsterdam Ave, Site 5005 New York, NY 10027

THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAI PROPERTY OF WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC. WHETHER THE PROJECT FO WHICH IT IS MADE IS EXECUTED OR NOT. THIS DRAWING SHALL NO USED BY THE OWNER OR OTHERS ON OTHER PROJECTS. fORaDD TO THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT IN WRITIN WIP DPC. SUBMITION OR DISTRIBUTION TO MEET OFFICIAL REGUL REQUIREMENTS OR FOR OTHER PURPOSES IN CONNECTION WITH PROJECT IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS PUBLICATION IN DEROGA THE RIGHTS OF WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC. REPRODUCTION OR PUBL BY ANY METHOD IN WHOLE OR IN PART IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO T DRAWING BELONGS TO WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC WITHOUT PREJUDI

No.

Description

01 02 03

Schematic Design Design Development Construction Document

Date

10.1.19 10.22.19 11.26.19

GREENPOINT THEATER

PERSPECTIVE Project Number Date Drawn By Checked By

Project Num Issue Au Che

A-901

Scale

18 Greenpoint Ave, Brooklyn NY, 11222

Owne 91 West LLC

WIP Architects, DPC 1172 Amsterdam Ave, Site 5005 New York, NY 10027

Architect HC, MS, JX, ZB 212 XXX XXXX

THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC. WHETHER THE PROJECT FOR WHICH IT IS MADE IS EXECUTED OR NOT. THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE USED BY THE OWNER OR OTHERS ON OTHER PROJECTS. fORaDDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT IN WRITING WIT WIP DPC. SUBMITION OR DISTRIBUTION TO MEET OFFICIAL REGULATOR REQUIREMENTS OR FOR OTHER PURPOSES IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS PUBLICATION IN DEROGATION O THE RIGHTS OF WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC. REPRODUCTION OR PUBLICATIO BY ANY METHOD IN WHOLE OR IN PART IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THIS DRAWING BELONGS TO WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

GREENPOINT THEATER PERSPECTIVE Project Number Date Drawn By Checked By

Scale

Project Numbe Issue Dat Autho Checke

A-900

A-200 F-101 2

S-201

19' - 0"

20' - 0"

17' - 8"

15' - 0"

C 2 1 A-301 A-400

15' - 0"

BOX OFFICE

CAFETE

COAT ROOM

AUD

15' - 0"

F 22' - 0"

1 A-301 F-100 1

8' - 0"

F.1

22' - 4"

STA

STAGE SUPPORT

H 8' - 0"

BACKST

7' - 7"

H.1

BACK OF

17' - 0"

6 3 A-200 102

FIRST LEVEL 3/32" = 1'-0"

20' - 0"

9 20' - 0"

10 20' - 0"

20' - 0"

No.

Description

01 02 03

Schematic Design Design Development Construction Document

Date

10.1.19 10.22.19 11.26.19

CLASSROOM

2' - 0"

D 4' - 0"

ERIA CAFE

F 1

BATHROOM

DITORIUM

18 Greenpoint Ave, Brooklyn NY, 11222

A-301

AGE

Architects HC, MS, JX, ZB 212 XXX XXXX

WIP Architects, DPC 1172 Amsterdam Ave, Site 5005 New York, NY 10027

F.1

MECHANICAL ROOM INCOMING SERVICE

Owner 91 West LLC

F-100

THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC. WHETHER THE PROJECT FOR WHICH IT IS MADE IS EXECUTED OR NOT. THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE USED BY THE OWNER OR OTHERS ON OTHER PROJECTS. fORaDDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT IN WRITING WITH WIP DPC. SUBMITION OR DISTRIBUTION TO MEET OFFICIAL REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS OR FOR OTHER PURPOSES IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS PUBLICATION IN DEROGATION OF THE RIGHTS OF WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC. REPRODUCTION OR PUBLICATION BY ANY METHOD IN WHOLE OR IN PART IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THIS DRAWING BELONGS TO WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

6' - 0 1/4"

GREENPOINT THEATER

TAGE

F HOUSE

J LOADING DOCK 1

A-200

Project Number Date

Drawn By Checked By

1 F-101

Scale

Project Number Issue Date Author Checker

A-101

3/32" = 1'-0"

12/12/2019 10:08:07 PM

FIRST LEVEL PLAN

2 1 A-400 A-301

T.O. STRUCTURE 42' - 0" T.O. ROOF 1 RAMP 38' - 4 3/8"

CATWALK 34' - 4 15/16"

1 S-201

T.O. STRUCTURE 42' - 0"

CATWALK 34' - 4 15/16"

UPPER LEVEL 26' - 0"

SECOND LEVEL 15' - 0"

UPPER LEVEL 26' - 0" FIRST LEVEL 4' - 0" SECOND LEVEL 15' - 0"

GROUND 0' - 0"

1 FIRST LEVEL 4' - 0"

West Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0"

GROUND 0' - 0"

K ADJACENT SOUTH FACADE (AGAINST BUILDING) 1/8" = 1'-0"

H.1

F.1 1 2 A-301 S-201

T.O. STRUCTURE 42' - 0" T.O. ROOF RAMP 38' - 4 3/8" CATWALK 34' - 4 15/16"

UPPER LEVEL 26' 11- 0"

T.O. STRUCTURE 42' - 0"

SECOND LEVEL 15' - 0"

T.O. ROOF RAMP 38' - 4 3/8" CATWALK 34' - 4 15/16"

FIRST LEVEL 4' - 0" GROUND 0' - 0"

UPPER LEVEL 26' - 0" 2 SECOND LEVEL 15' - 0"

FIRST LEVEL 4' - 0" GROUND 0' - 0"

North Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0"

East Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0"

A-300

H.1

1 2 2

A-301 S-201

A-300

T.O. STRUCTURE 42' - 0"

T.O. ROOF RAMP 11 38' - 4 3/8"

No.

Description

01 02 03

Schematic Design Design Development Construction Document

CATWALK 34' - 4 15/16"

UPPER LEVEL 26' - 0"

Date

10.1.19 10.22.19 11.26.19

T.O. STRUCTURE 42' - 0" T.O. ROOF RAMP 38' - 4 3/8"

SECOND LEVEL 15' - 0"

CATWALK 34' - 4 15/16"

UPPER LEVEL 26' - 0"

No.

Description

01 02 03

Schematic Design Design Development Construction Document

Date

10.1.19 10.22.19 11.26.19

FIRST LEVEL 4' - 0" GROUND 0' - 0"

SECOND LEVEL 15' - 0"

FIRST LEVEL 4' - 0" GROUND 0' - 0"

A 18 Greenpoint Ave, Brooklyn NY, 11222

2 A-301

T.O. STRUCTURE 42' - 0" T.O. ROOF RAMP 38' - 4 3/8"

Architects HC, MS, JX, ZB 212 XXX XXXX

THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC. WHETHER THE PROJECT FOR WHICH IT IS MADE IS EXECUTED OR NOT. THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE USED BY THE OWNER OR OTHERS ON OTHER PROJECTS. fORaDDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT IN WRITING WITH WIP DPC. SUBMITION OR DISTRIBUTION TO MEET OFFICIAL REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS OR FOR OTHER PURPOSES IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS PUBLICATION IN DEROGATION OF THE RIGHTS OF WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC. REPRODUCTION OR PUBLICATION BY ANY METHOD IN WHOLE OR IN PART IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THIS 18 Greenpoint Owner DRAWINGAve, BELONGS TO WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Brooklyn NY, 11222 91 West LLC

CATWALK 34' - 4 15/16"

Owner 91 West LLC

WIP Architects, DPC 1172 Amsterdam Ave, Site 5005 New York, NY 10027

UPPER LEVEL 26'1- 0"

Architects HC, MS, JX, ZB 212 XXX XXXX

WIP Architects, DPC 1172 Amsterdam Ave, Site 5005 New York, NY 10027

1 S-201

SECOND LEVEL 15' - 0"

T.O. STRUCTURE 42' - 0" T.O. ROOF RAMP 38' - 4 3/8"

FIRST LEVEL 4' - 0"

CATWALK 34' - 4 15/16"

GREENPOINT THEATER

THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC. WHETHER THE PROJECT FOR WHICH IT IS MADE IS EXECUTED OR NOT. THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE USED BY THE OWNER OR OTHERS ON OTHER PROJECTS. fORaDDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT IN WRITING WITH WIP DPC. SUBMITION OR DISTRIBUTION TO MEET OFFICIAL REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS OR FOR OTHER PURPOSES IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS PUBLICATION IN DEROGATION OF THE RIGHTS OF WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC. REPRODUCTION OR PUBLICATION BY ANY METHOD IN WHOLE OR IN PART IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THIS DRAWING BELONGS TO WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

MAPPED E-W ELEVATIONS GREENPOINT THEATERProject Number

GROUND 0' - 0" UPPER LEVEL 26' - 0"

Project Number

SECOND LEVEL 15' - 0"

Date

MAPPED N-S ELEVATIONS

Drawn By

Checked By FIRST LEVEL 4' - 0" GROUND 0' - 0"

Scale Project Number Date Drawn By Checked By

Scale

F-100

Issue Date Author Checker

1/8" = 1'-0" Project Number Issue Date Author Checker

F-101

1/8" = 1'-0"

12/12/2019 10:49:36 PM

12/12/2019 10:52:54 PM

F.1

2x4 WOOD PLANKS PEDESTAL

6" CONC. ON MTL DECK WATER BARRIER 6" RIGID INSULATION 60" STEEL TRUSS

RETURN AIR DUCT

ROOF DRAIN

SLOPED DROP CEILING SUSPENDED ACOUSTIC PANEL STOREFRONT GLAZING

THEATER OVE

6" CONC. ON MTL DECK GWB SUSPENDED CEILING

8" CONCRETE PLANK HVAC DIFFUSER

1 HR RATED GWB TYPE X ON 8" MTL STUDS

2' -

WOOD PANEL FINISH MOUNTED ON HAT CHANNEL FURRING

3/4" 1HR FP PANEL CELLING

HALLWAY

4" RIGID INSULATION VAPOR BARRIER

0' -

W-10 STEEL JOIST

1' - 6"

10"

1-1/2" STEEL DECK 8" ACOUSTIC BATTS 18GA DUCT PANEL AIR SPACE SLOPED W24 GIRDER/STRINGER

1 HR RATED GWB TYPE X ON 8" MTL STUDS 3' - 0"

WOOD PANEL FINISH MOUNTED ON HAT CHANNEL FURRING

RECEPTION CO

2 LAYERS TYPE X WP GWB W10 COLUMN 14"x14" CONCRETE COLUMN

6" BATT INSULATION VAPOR BARRIER 4'x2' DUCT

1" CEMENT MORTAR 12" CONCRETE SLAB WATER/VAPOR BARRIER SOIL/OTHER BACKFILL

WALL SECTION @ THEATER SEATING 1/2" = 1'-0"

LOBBY ENTRY WALL 1/2" = 1'-0"

EXTERIOR EXTERIOR WOOD DECK RAISED FLOOR SYSTEM 3-PLY ROOFING MEMBRANE

EXTERIOR WOOD DECK RAISED FLOOR SYSTEM 3-PLY ROOFING MEMBRANE 6" RIGID INSULATION, SLOPE 3/8" PER FOOT

6" RIGID INSULATION, SLOPE 3/8" PER FOOT TRANSITION ALIGNED W/ EDGE OF SLOPE 6" CONC. ON MTL DECK

6" CONC. ON MTL DECK ALUM PANEL RAINSCREEN W24X94 BEAM SPRAY FOAM INSULATION

INTERIOR

COLD-FORMED FRAMING

4 MTL CEILING PANELS

RAISED FLOOR TO VEGETATED ROOF TRANSITION 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

T.O. ROOF RAMP 38' - 4 3/8" DEFLECTION CLIPS @ ALUM STOREFRONT HEAD

EXTERIOR

INTERIOR EXTERIOR WOOD DECK RAISED FLOOR SYSTEM 3-PLY ROOFING MEMBRANE 6" RIGID INSULATION, SLOPE 3/8" PER FOOT

ROOF EAVE DETAIL 1 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

CATWALK 34' - 4 15/16"

BLOCKING 6" CONC. ON MTL DECK

No.

Description

01 02 03

Schematic Design Design Development Construction Document

Date

10.1.19 10.22.19 11.26.19

EXTERIOR

INTERIOR

STOREFRONT DOUBLE - GLAZING ALUM. CURTAIN WALL SILL

COLD-FORMED STEEL FRAMING, SLOPE TO DRAIN AT SILL ALUM PANEL RAINSCREEN

ERLOOK

STEEL BEAM PER ROOF PLAN HAT FURRING CHANNEL 5/8" GWB CEILING FINISH PER RCP

RAISED FLOOR TO SKYLIGHT 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

6" CONC. ON MTL DECK W12X26 BEAM

SPRAY FOAM INSULATION WOOD SHIM TO PROVIDE ANGLES @ COLD-FORMED TRACKS

EXTERIOR SOFFIT

UPPER LEVEL 26' - 0"

STOREFRONT SILL @ SLAB EDGE 2 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

EXTERIOR

INTERIOR

STOREFRONT DOUBLE - GLAZING ALUM. CURTAIN WALL SILL 2°

1 S-105

SHIM W/ BACKER ROD & SEALANT

Sim

COLD-FORMED STEEL FRAMING, SLOPE TO DRAIN AT SILL ALUM PANEL RAINSCREEN

PRECAST STAIR STEP 1' - 3"

STAINLESS STEEL EXPANSION BOLT 3"x3" STEEL ANGLE

7°

SPRAY FOAM INSULATION

EXTERIOR SOFFIT

STOREFRONT SILL @ ENTRY STAIR

Owner3 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 91 West LLC

18 Greenpoint Ave, Brooklyn NY, 11222

Architects HC, MS, JX, ZB 212 XXX XXXX

WIP Architects, DPC 1172 Amsterdam Ave, Site 5005 New York, NY 10027

SECOND LEVEL 15' - 0"

THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC. WHETHER THE PROJECT FOR WHICH IT IS MADE IS EXECUTED OR NOT. THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE USED BY THE OWNER OR OTHERS ON OTHER PROJECTS. fORaDDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT IN WRITING WITH WIP DPC. SUBMITION OR DISTRIBUTION TO MEET OFFICIAL REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS OR FOR OTHER PURPOSES IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS PUBLICATION IN DEROGATION OF THE RIGHTS OF WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC. REPRODUCTION OR PUBLICATION BY ANY METHOD IN WHOLE OR IN PART IS PROHIBITED. TITLEDECK TO THIS EXTERIOR WOOD DRAWING BELONGS TO WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC WITHOUT PREJUDICE. RAISED FLOOR SYSTEM

METAL FLASHING 4" CONC. CURB

EXTERIOR

ROOF VEGETATION

EXTERIOR WOOD DECK RAISED FLOOR SYSTEM 3-PLY ROOFING MEMBRANE

3-PLY ROOFING MEMBRANE 6" RIGID INSULATION, SLOPE 3/8" PER FOOT

GROWTH MEDIUM FILTER FABRIC

6" RIGID INSULATION, SLOPE 3/8" PER FOOT TRANSITION ALIGNED W/ EDGE OF SLOPE 6" CONC. ON MTL DECK

6" CONC. ON MTL DECK ALUM PANEL RAINSCREEN

STEEL BEAM PER ROOF PLAN

GREENPOINT THEATER W24X94 BEAM

OUNTER

SPRAY FOAM INSULATION COLD-FORMED FRAMING

INTERIOR

RAISED FLOOR TO VEGETATED ROOF TRANSITION 4 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

MTL CEILING PANELS

FOH AND BOH WALL SECTION

No.

Description

01 02 03

Schematic Design Design Development Construction Document

Date

10.1.19 10.22.19 11.26.19

DEFLECTION CLIPS @ ALUM STOREFRONT HEAD

FIRST LEVEL 4' - 0"

GROUND 0' - 0"

Drawn By EXTERIOR Checked By

STOREFRONT DOUBLE - GLAZING ALUM. CURTAIN WALL SILL COLD-FORMED STEEL FRAMING, SLOPE TO DRAIN AT SILL ALUM PANEL RAINSCREEN

INTERIOR

Project Number Issue Date Author Checker

A-710

6" CONC. ON MTL DECK W12X26 BEAM

SPRAY FOAM INSULATION

Scale

1/2" = 1'-0"

WOOD SHIM TO PROVIDE ANGLES @ COLD-FORMED TRACKS

STEEL BEAM PER ROOF PLAN HAT FURRING CHANNEL 5/8" GWB CEILING FINISH PER RCP

INTERIOR

RAISED FLOOR TO SKYLIGHT 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

18 Greenpoint Ave, Brooklyn NY, 11222 WIP Architects, DPC 1172 Amsterdam Ave, Site 5005 New York, NY 10027

Owner 91 West LLC Architects HC, MS, JX, ZB 212 XXX XXXX

THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC. WHETHER THE PROJECT FOR WHICH IT IS MADE IS EXECUTED OR NOT. THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE USED BY THE OWNER OR OTHERS ON OTHER PROJECTS. fORaDDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT IN WRITING WITH WIP DPC. SUBMITION OR DISTRIBUTION TO MEET OFFICIAL REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS OR FOR OTHER PURPOSES IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS PUBLICATION IN DEROGATION OF THE RIGHTS OF WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC. REPRODUCTION OR PUBLICATION BY ANY METHOD IN WHOLE OR IN PART IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THIS DRAWING BELONGS TO WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

EXTERIOR SOFFIT

STOREFRONT SILL @ SLAB EDGE 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

EXTERIOR

GREENPOINT THEATER

INTERIOR

STOREFRONT DOUBLE - GLAZING ALUM. CURTAIN WALL SILL 2°

SHIM W/ BACKER ROD & SEALANT COLD-FORMED STEEL FRAMING, SLOPE TO DRAIN AT SILL ALUM PANEL RAINSCREEN

PRECAST STAIR STEP STAINLESS STEEL EXPANSION BOLT

SPRAY FOAM INSULATION

1' - 3"

BLOCKING 6" CONC. ON MTL DECK

12/12/2019 10:17:29 PM

Project Number Date

BOH WALL SECTION 1/2" = 1'-0"

EXTERIOR WOOD DECK RAISED FLOOR SYSTEM 3-PLY ROOFING MEMBRANE 6" RIGID INSULATION, SLOPE 3/8" PER FOOT

ROOF EAVE DETAIL 1 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

EXTERIOR

INTERIOR

EXTERIOR

3"x3" STEEL ANGLE

ARCHITECTURE DETAILS

3D Structure Axon

No.

Description

01 02 03

Schematic Design Design Development Construction Document

18 Greenpoint Ave, Brooklyn NY, 11222

Date

10.1.19 10.22.19 11.26.19

Owner 91 West LLC Architects HC, MS, JX, ZB 212 XXX XXXX

WIP Architects, DPC 1172 Amsterdam Ave, Site 5005 New York, NY 10027

THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC. WHETHER THE PROJECT FOR WHICH IT IS MADE IS EXECUTED OR NOT. THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE USED BY THE OWNER OR OTHERS ON OTHER PROJECTS. fORaDDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT BY OTHERS EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT IN WRITING WITH WIP DPC. SUBMITION OR DISTRIBUTION TO MEET OFFICIAL REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS OR FOR OTHER PURPOSES IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS PUBLICATION IN DEROGATION OF THE RIGHTS OF WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC. REPRODUCTION OR PUBLICATION BY ANY METHOD IN WHOLE OR IN PART IS PROHIBITED. TITLE TO THIS DRAWING BELONGS TO WIP ARCHITECTS, DPC WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

GREENPOINT THEATER

Project Number Date Drawn By Checked By

Scale

Project Number Issue Date Author Checker

S-106

12/12/2019 10:46:42 PM

STRUCTURAL AXON DIAGRAM

) $

'HVFULSWLRQ

'DWH

6FKHPDWLF 'HVLJQ 'HVLJQ 'HYHORSPHQW &RQVWUXFWLRQ 'RFXPHQW

&21&(66,216

% )2+

Zone 3

ENTRY + LOBBY

3500 CFM @3F 7000 CFM (total)

' '1

(

)

$YH

180

2ZQHU :HVW //&

$ 6

$UFKLWHFWV +& 06 -; =% ;;; ;;;;

'3& P $YH 6LWH

)

6 $1 ,167580(17 2) 6(59,&( $1' 6+$// 5(0$,1 7+( :,3 $5&+,7(&76 '3& :+(7+(5 7+( 352-(&7 )25 '( ,6 (;(&87(' 25 127 7+,6 '5$:,1* 6+$// 127 %( :1(5 25 27+(56 21 27+(5 352-(&76 I25D'',7,216 &7 %< 27+(56 (;&(37 %< $*5((0(17 ,1 :5,7,1* :,7+ ,7,21 25 ',675,%87,21 72 0((7 2)),&,$/ 5(*8/$725< 6 25 )25 27+(5 385326(6 ,1 &211(&7,21 :,7+ 7+( 7 72 %( &216758(' $6 38%/,&$7,21 ,1 '(52*$7,21 2) :,3 $5&+,7(&76 '3& 5(352'8&7,21 25 38%/,&$7,21 ' ,1 :+2/( 25 ,1 3$57 ,6 352+,%,7(' 7,7/( 72 7+,6 1*6 72 :,3 $5&+,7(&76 '3& :,7+287 35(-8',&(

*5((132,17 7+($7(5

+ +

(&21' /(9(/ 0(&+$1,&$/

AHU 1 '1

Zone 1 18’x40’

18000cfm

AHU 2

$+8 (;7(5,25 63$&( Zone 2+3 18’x35’

13000cfm

. 3URMHFW 1XPEHU ,VVXH 'DWH $XWKRU &KHFNHU

833(5 /(9(/

'HVFULSWLRQ

6FKHPDWLF 'HVLJQ 'HVLJQ 'HYHORSPHQW &RQVWUXFWLRQ 'RFXPHQW

'DWH

/281*(

&21&(66,216 '1

Zone 4

CLASSRM + COMMUNITY

9000CFM @3F 18500 CFM (total)

one 1

UDITORIUM

000 CFM (total) *UHHQSRLQW $YH %URRNO\Q 1<

2ZQHU :HVW //& $UFKLWHFWV +& 06 -; =% ;;; ;;;;

:,3 $UFKLWHFWV '3& $PVWHUGDP $YH 6LWH 1HZ <RUN 1<

Zone 2

BACKSTAGE

500 CFM @3F 6000 CFM (total)

7+,6 '5$:,1* ,6 $1 ,167580(17 2) 6(59,&( $1' 6+$// 5(0$,1 7+( 3523(57< 2) :,3 $5&+,7(&76 '3& :+(7+(5 7+( 352-(&7 )25 :+,&+ ,7 ,6 0$'( ,6 (;(&87(' 25 127 7+,6 '5$:,1* 6+$// 127 %( 86(' %< 7+( 2:1(5 25 27+(56 21 27+(5 352-(&76 I25D'',7,216 72 7+,6 352-(&7 %< 27+(56 (;&(37 %< $*5((0(17 ,1 :5,7,1* :,7+ :,3 '3& 68%0,7,21 25 ',675,%87,21 72 0((7 2)),&,$/ 5(*8/$725< 5(48,5(0(176 25 )25 27+(5 385326(6 ,1 &211(&7,21 :,7+ 7+( 352-(&7 ,6 127 72 %( &216758(' $6 38%/,&$7,21 ,1 '(52*$7,21 2) 7+( 5,*+76 2) :,3 $5&+,7(&76 '3& 5(352'8&7,21 25 38%/,&$7,21 %< $1< 0(7+2' ,1 :+2/( 25 ,1 3$57 ,6 352+,%,7(' 7,7/( 72 7+,6 '5$:,1* %(/21*6 72 :,3 $5&+,7(&76 '3& :,7+287 35(-8',&(

CHILLER UNITS &+,//(5 (;7(5,25 63$&( 30’x25’

*5((132,17 7+($7(5 Zone 4 18’x40’

19000cfm

3URMHFW 1XPEHU

'DWH 'UDZQ %\ &KHFNHG %\

6FDOH

3URMHFW 1XPEHU ,VVXH 'DWH $XWKRU &KHFNHU

7+,5' /(9(/ 0(&+$1,&$/

AHU 3

Different Medical Clinic run by Private Doctors

Empire City Laboratories, LabQ Diagnostics, Ideal Denture Laboratory

Biosensor / Laborbatories

BCA NEIGHBORHOOD SENIOR CENTER, United Senior Citizens Center, Sunset Park Neighborhood Senior Center

Nursing Home

Clinic

NYU Langone Hospital Brooklyn, Lutheran Medical Center

Hospital

HEALTH-TECH PILOT INSTITUTE GSAPP Architecture Technology V Instructor: Craig Schwitter

Collaborator: Yasmin B. Lin H. Alexa L.

Spring 2020

The project aims to develop a pilot model that would combine solutions to the health issues stated above with opportunities to test and manufacture some of the technologies described. A mobile health clinic is central to our strategy. These clinics can offer preventive screenings, primary care, and educational opportunities while mitigating the systemic barriers that exist particularly within vulnerable populations. To this end, the pilot institute has both, fixed and mobile elements. On site programs include a biosensor R&D lab as well as a lightweight biosensor manufacturer. A fitness center will be built to create opportunities for testing biosensor products. Other facilities will include a clinical office for the doctors working the mobile fleet and a data center with a servicing and recharge dock occupying a large portion of the street level. The layout of the servicing area was done to maximize the efficiency of movement and servicing of the mobile clinic fleet as it relates to the Sunset Park residents.

MOBILITY SYSTEMS_SUNSET PARK

59TH

WATER SYSTEMS

10 Minutes Walking Distance From Site/Green Space Greenway/Cycling

Activity Distrcit/Zone

Walking Distance From Subway Station Subway Highway Ferry Subway Station/Highway Exit

Legend

53TH

45TH

COSTCO

36TH

25TH

Prospect Ave

MASTER PLAN

Pedestrian Path Moblie Clinic Units Path to Recharge station Driving Path to site

Biosenser Manufacturer Area: 75,000 SQFT for three department buildings

Biosenser R&D Lab Area: 75,000 SQFT for four department buildings

GYM Fitness Center Area: 25,000 SQFT

Digester & Water Treatment Area: 35,000 SQFT

Data Center(Top) & Moblie Clinic Units Recharge Station(Bottom) Area: 50,000 SQFT Fixed Clinic Department Area: 25,000 SQFT

Water Tank 56,000 CUBIC FT

Green Waterfront

Green Space/Park

WATER SYSTEMS DRINKING WATER BLUE WATER Grid Water

GREY WATER BLACK WATER

182,500 Gallons

548,960 Gallons

LIGHT MFG

LAB

Sewage Discharge

175,200 Gallons

87,600 Gallons

GYM

OFFICE

DATA CENTER

Methane

Anaerobic Digestor

Rain Water

34,309 Gallons

RECHARGING

Filtration Plant

Total Annal Blue Water Usage: Compost

Fertilizer

City Sewer

2,095,798.5 Gallons

4,460,116 Gallons

ENERGY SYSTEMS

OFFICE - Air distribution -Active + Passive system -Automatic door / window -Low E window -Light Timmer

553,725 kwh/year

GYM -Air distribution -Active + Passive system -Automatic door / window -Low E window -Light Timmer

375,131 kwh/year

Geothermal

DATA CENTER -Radiant distribution -Active + Passive system -Automatic door / window -Low E window -Light Timmer

372,200 wh/year

Battery

LIGHT MFG -Air distribution -Active system -Automatic door / window -Low E window -Light Timmer

587,607 kwh/year

LAB -Radiant distribution -Active + Passive system -Automatic door / window -Low E window -Light Timmer

3,835,127 kwh/year

Methane

1,689,554 kwh/year

Anaerobic Digestor

RECHARGING

MOBILE CLINIC MOBILE CLINIC

DATA CENTER

BIOSENSOR DEVELOPER

health screenings, preventative care, vaccination, blood testing, mobile dialysis, education, counseling

data analysis & storage

SUNSET PARK & BEYOND outreach into neighborhoods

data collection

wearable devices, biosensor education, AR home installation and demonstrations

OUTREACH RESEARCH EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY LANGUAGE

BLUE WATER (CITY WATER) GREYWATER (sink) BLACK WATER (toilet, manufacturing)

MOBILE CLINIC ENERGY electric

RECHARGE (lithium ion EV batteries)

SOLAR PANELS (electricity, heating, cooling)

Mobile Clinic Diagram

7x 72 cell Solar Panel

11.00

Bath

8.00

12.00

11.00

Driver Exam Rm #1

Exam Rm #2

Vest.

30.50 40.00

A/C Exam Rm #1

Motor

Blue Water Tank Bathroom

Gry/Blk Water Tank

Exam Rm #2

Storage/Battery

Driver

SPIRAL TOWER CED Arch 160 Construction Instructor: Dana Buntrock Collaborator: Yohana A. Rose W. Chloe Z.

3’-0”

12’-0”

3’-0” 3’-0” 3’-0”

The objective of this construction project is to build a 12 feet wood tower. The tower consists four 3-feet tall modules. We believe that material efficiency can be achieved through simple yet durable structure. Eliminating excessive members and joints can avoid structural failures.

12’-0” 12’-0” 12’-0”

Spring 2019

Joint Detail Explained Miter joint and lap joint are used in the construction because of their simplicity and efficiency. Screws and nails are used along with wood glue to reinforce the structure.

CAT-ILEVER STAIR CED Arch 160 Construction Instructor: Dana Buntrock Collaborator: Yohana A. Rose W. Chloe Z.

Spring 2019

This is a half scale stair to explore the construction of steel. Stair for cats comes from the scale that is suitable for cats to play. The design pursues a continuous pattern of structures, creating a simple yet complex flow of geometry.

Process of Assembly

Finish stringers and treads, then add the structure, put balustrades last.

Joint Detail Explained

Miter joint are used to build the stair. Joining members of steel by welding.

PLAY-HOUSE CED Arch 150 Introduction to Structure Instructor: Gary Black Collaborator: Akil A. Jackie S.

Fall 2018

Our playground seeks to give users several affordances for play using the varied structure throughout the project. The structure is held together using pin connections, directing the load along angled members of the trusses throughout. The trusses provide the stiffness to carry the load and to frame points of entry and methods for circulation up, down, and around the playhouse. It is left open during testing and in the digital model, but can be covered using light material such as blankets, curtains, or towels depending on time of year and what users might have on hand in their home. Children are meant to travel under, over, and through the truss in a variety of combinations to play within the house. Because of the design and its structural integrity, we imagined the playhouse to be able to exist in any orientation and accommodate the needs and wants of different methods of play in a modular and flexible fashion to grow with its users and continue to provide interesting, and engaging play. The thinking and the intentions behind the design remained throughout the process, but there were several changes in the structure that took place. The first issues we faced had to do with the connections with respect to whether they were true pin connections, and how the string would attach to the wooden members. We had to go through some trial and error with the connection to make sure we put the string through the right members while going around others. Our final connections became a combination of both as many of the connections needed to be tied on the outside in order to not get in the way of any members. The structure was able to withstand its load during the final test become of this combination.

epts

ion

eeks to give users several affordances for play structure throughout the project. The structure using pin connections, directing the load along of the trusses throughout. The trusses provide the he load and to frame points of entry and methods down, and around the playhouse. It is left open in the digital model, but can be covered using light blankets, curtains, or towels depending on time of ers might have on hand in their home. Children el under, over, and through the truss in a variety o play within the house. Because of the design ntegrity, we imagined the playhouse to be able to ation and accommodate the needs and wants of of play in a modular and flexible fashion to grow continue to provide interesting, and engaging play.

Abulaiti Akeli, Jacqueline Serrano

Process Sketches First and second iterations of digital model. The first model shows the initial intentions of a modular/flexible design while the second model has a more developed structural scheme, trying to still keep this other quality in mind. It also takes into account the correct height and a balcony.

d the intentions behind the design remained rocess, but there were several changes in the place. The first issues we faced had to do with the espect to whether they were true pin connections, g would attach to the wooden members. We had e trial and error with the connection to make sure through the right members while going around connections became a combination of both as ections needed to be tied on the outside in order way of any members. The structure was able to during the final test become of this combination.

use

UC Berkeley ARCH 150,

Abulaiti Akeli, Jacqueline Serr Abulaiti Akeli, Jacqueline Serrano, Joey Xu

Final Design Playhouse Design Final Playhouse

East Elevation East Elevation North ElevationNorth Elev

Abulaiti Akeli, Jacqueline AbulaitiSerrano, Akeli, Jacqueline Joey Xu Serrano, Joey Xu First Floor Plan Second Floor Plan First Floor Plan Second Floor Plan

West Elevation West Elevation South ElevationSouth Elev Project 2: Playhouse

Project 2: Playhouse

UC Berkeley ARCH 1 UC Berkeley ARCH 150, Fall 2018

East Elevation East Elevation

North Elevation North Elevation

West Elevation West Elevation

South Elevation South Elevation

cond FloorSecond Plan Floor Plan

UC Berkeley ARCH UC 150,Berkeley Fall 2018 ARCH 150, Fall 2018

Final Model Load Calculation and SAP Simulation Load Calculation SAP Simulation FinalFinal ModelModel Load Calculation and SAP and Simulation Wind Load

Vertical Load

Height: 12ftWidth: 8ft

Wind Load 40 PSF Height: 12ft

Wind Load 40 PSF

Ground Floor Wind Load 40 PSF

Ground Floor Assume all goes to fundation Assume all goes to fundation Floor = 0 Load = 0 Ground Load

Assume all goes to fundation

First Floor Load = 0First Floor Tributary Area 8x6 =Tributary 48sf Area 8x6 = 48sf Load=48sfx40psf = 1920lb First Floor Load=48sfx40psf = 1920lb Linear load = 2.88kips/in

TributaryLinear Area 8x6 load==48sf 2.88kips/in Load=48sfx40psf = 1920lb Second Floor (roof) Linear = 2.88kips/in Tributary Area: 4x6load = 24sf Second Floor (roof) Load: 24sfx40psf = Tributary 960lb Area: 4x6 = 24sf Linear loadSecond = 1.44kip/in Floor (roof) Load: 24sfx40psf = 960lb TributaryLinear Area:load 4x6 == 24sf 1.44kip/in Load: 24sfx40psf = 960lb Linear load = 1.44kip/in

Load Assign 3D

Moment 3-3

Shear 2-2

DL Len Vertical DL+LL= 15+40=55psf Wi Length: 8ft DL+LL= 15+40 Width: 8ft Length: 8ft Width: 8ft Fir First Floor (DL+LL) Are Area = 8ft x 8ft = 64sf Loa First Floor (DL Load = 64sf x 55psf = 3520lb Lin Area = 8ft x 8f Linear Load: 1.867kip/in Load = 64sf x Second Floor (DL) Linear Load:Se1 Area = 4ft x 8ft = 32sf Are Load = 32sf x 15psf = 525lb Second Floor Loa Linear Load: 0.394ki/in Area = 4ft x 8f Lin Moment 3-3 Load = 32sf x Linear Load: 0 Moment 3-3

Wind LoadWidth: 8ft Height: 12ft Load Width: 8ft Wind

Shear 2-2 Shear 2-2

Load Assign 3D

Deformed Shape 3D

Joint Design

Project 2: Playhouse

Load Assign 3D Load Assign 3D

Deformed Shape 3D Load

Deformed Shape 3D

Project 2: Playhouse Project 2: Playhouse Joint Design Joint Design

Abulaiti Akeli, Jacqueline Joey Xu Serrano, Joey Xu AbulaitiSerrano, Akeli, Jacqueline

Designing stable and strong joints is one of the most important objectives of our model. We explored multiple ways to make pin connections using string and dowels. Our technique: Drill a hole through the dowel; insert string into the hole; connect to another

Load Test and Conclusion Results Total Load Carried: 135lb Total Self Weight: 1.15lb Strength to Weight Ratio: 135lb/1.15lb=117.39

Conclusion The model collapsed due to joint failure. On the joints, we can see members are ripped apart. None of the members themselves actually shattered, meaning that there is not axial, shear and bending failures. The joints were not strong enough to withstand the load. In order to increase the strength of the joints, more rounds of tied string can be applied at each joint. The material of the string can also be changed to withstand more tension; ties can also be improved to make the joints tighter and stronger. The design can also be simplified to have less members connecting on one joint to reach the static equilibrium without redundancy. One of the limitations of this projects is that we only tested shear in one direction which does not give us the whole picture of the structural integrity of the playhouse. We might have designed this model stronger in one direction while ignoring the other. Vertical load was also not tested in this experiment due to weight limitations.

Load Test Project 2: Playhouse Project 2: Playhouse

Conclusion

Abulaiti Akeli, Jacqueline Serrano, Joey Xu

Jacqueline Serrano, Joey Xu The model collapsed due to joint failure. OnAbulaiti the joints,Akeli, we can see members are ripped apart. None of the members themselves actually shattered, meaning that there is not axial, shear and bending failures. The joints were not strong enough to withstand the load. In order to increase the strength of the joints, more rounds of tied string can be applied at each joint. The material of the string can also be changed to withstand more tension; ties can also be improved to make the joints tighter and stronger. The design can also be simplified to have less members connecting on one joint to reach the static equilibrium without redundancy. One of the limitations of this projects is that we only tested shear in one direction which does not give us the whole picture of the structural integrity of the playhouse. We might have designed this model stronger in one direction while ignoring the other. Vertical load was also not tested in this experiment due to weight limitations.

Abulaiti Akeli, Jacqu

Load Test and Conclusion Project 2: Playhouse

UC Berk

Results Total Load Carried: 135lb Total Self Weight: 1.15lb Strength to Weight Ratio: 135lb/1.15lb=117.39

Abulaiti Akeli, Jacqueline Serrano, Joey Xu

One of the limitations of this projects is that we only tested shear UC Berkeley ARCH 150, Fall 2018 in one direction which does not give us the whole picture of the structural integrity of the playhouse. We might have designed this model stronger in one direction while ignoring the other. Vertical load was also not tested in this experiment due to weight limitations.

Project 2: Playhouse

UC Berkele

ART GALLERY CED Arch 140 Energy and Environment Instructor: Gail Brager + Stefano Schiavon Collaborator: Akil A. Alani A. Cheryl L.

Spring 2018

Our location is Arches, Utah which is a desert climate with very high direct sun levels throughout the year and especially during the summer months. Since the location has so much direct sun exposure and is known for its natural features in the national park, we want to bring in plenty of natural light and visually connect visitors to the outside. To accomplish this, we made openings on the south-side, north-side, and ceiling. We chose these sides because this allows us to maximize the amount of natural light brought inside while keeping it under control. (The east and west sides would’ve been difficult to control and added the possible issue of glare in the museum). A thin clerestory window along the south facade lets in just enough light to illuminate the light-sensitive paintings. An overhang, paired with a light shelf, serve to block high summer sun, and to let in low winter sun and reflect it throughout the interior. This creates a soft light. Two thin skylights along the east and west edges of the roof highlight paintings hung on adjacent walls by washing the walls below and illuminating the artwork. In order to prevent direct sunlight, the skylights are covered with a translucent film to diffuse the light. A lightwell through the middle of the gallery lets in plenty of light. At the base of the well is a miniature native landscape, around which sit the sculptures. On the north facade, seven large windows frame a view of the dramatic landscape beyond the gallery, offering the visitor a chance to observe the landscape as art. The gallery space is dynamic in its various different lighting and spatial experiences. Arches itself has a ‘sublime’ quality to it which we want the museum to reflect. We intend for visitors to feel differently in each area of the museum, so we created spaces of varying lighting levels. For instance, the area around the light well is especially bright while other areas within the free standing walls are quite dark.

Winter Summer

Sefaira Analysis v.2

Shading needs-Arches, UT Shading needs-Arches, UT

December—June

June—December

Percent Shading Analysis

Shading Mask