STUDIO AIR JOURNAL PART B YUJING WANG
PART B CRITERIA DESIGN
FIG. 1. AE27: Honeycomb Oculi. A DALIY DOSE OF ARCHITECTURE. https://a html
archidose.blogspot.com.au/2013/12/ae27-honeycomb-oculi.
CONTENTS
B.1 RESEARCH FIELD GEOMETRY B.2 CASE STUDY 1.0 2.1 ITERATION CREATION 2.2 BEST ITERATIONS SELECTIONS B.3 CASE STUDY 2.0 3.1 REVERSE ENGINEERING B.4 TECHINIQUE: DEVELOPMENT B.5 PROTOTYPING B.6 DESIGN PROPOSAL B.7 LEARNING OUTCOME B.8 ALGORITHMIC SKETCHEBOOK
B. 1 RESEARCH FIELD STRIP AND FOLDING
Strips and folding is the important algorithmic in which multiple strips and single surface is transformed into volumetric space. A bend and a single fold can already turn a flat surface into three dimensional object. By adding more folds and strips, complexity and dunamic builds up which generate unique geometry. This research proposes some important computational methods to generate rapidly complex folded plate structures that can be built with crossed panels. Composition and dimensions of these strips as well as the possibility to mill them by Computer Numerically Controlled digital tecniques, show a great potential for surface structures. In my opinion, the aim of this research field is to reveal this potential in the domain of folded strips structures. An interdisciplinary team investigates architectural, structural and mathematical aspects of folded strips structures built from different components. In my project, this technique is useful to form finding process to create the dunamic and flexible shape of design. It is rapid to alter the size, segment and frequencies of the folds of our design, even the angle of folding. Then the volumetric space change both internally and externally. Also the strips and folding method is forceful to enhance the vusial aesthetic, spatial arrangement, functional circulation of the design directly. Refer to the research, There are different ways of constructing folded structure in terms of their forms and the application of different materials they are made of. Based on the research and analysis of the formal potential of the folded constructions the systematization of folded structures was done in terms of shape and geometry. The term folded structure defines a folded form of construction, including structures made of plates and structures made of sticks which make a folded form by their mutual relationship in space. Some authors also call folded structure the origami construction.1
1. FOLDED STRUCTURES IN MODERN ARCHITECTURE. University of Belgrade, Faculty of Architecture, Serbia
FIG. 1. LOOP 3 https://www.google.com.au/search?q=(Str Bologna&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwilt5G
FIG. 2. https://www.google.com.au/search?biw=1500&bih ch&sa=1&q=Chalmers+Uni+Tech+-+Archipelago+Pavilion& ers+Uni+Tech+-+Archipelago+Pavilion&gs_l=psy-ab.3...2266 0.188.353.0j2.2.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..0.0.0.0.rUf9Xk5Tv7s#img
rips)+Co-de-iT+and+UniGJ-KTWAhWEipQKHemtB-
h=895&tbm=is&oq=Chalm631.226924.0.228840.2.2.0.0.0. grc=2XjHqDpX_grbjM:
FIG. 3. gallery of marc fornes. https://www.google.com.au/search?biw=1500&bih=895&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=Marc+Fornes%2FTheVeryMany&oq=Marc+Fornes%2FTheVeryMany&gs_l=psy-ab.3...5085.5688.0.7534.2.2.0.0.0.0.1 79.352.0j2.2.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..0.0.0.0.L0zCOg_kGUM#imgdii=iEDf-6dqgSZw9M:&imgrc=IUuJM-89Nb5z-M:
B.2 CASE STUDY 01 BIOTHING PAVILION
With And focu al sy of se bec this p patt field dime sect In ea and ship frivin and form mar twee ers o is co diffe pav trac al co artis - em betw poss to th Con stud ome pav acti the
FIG. 4. Patternity. https://www.google.com.au/search?q=Biothing+Pavilion&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiP9py-g6XWAhWMnZQKHW3GCgcQ_AUICygC&biw=1500&bih=895#imgdii=kE6vNtRkEIH6nM:&imgrc=R8zDO2ubKZHH_M:
2. ‘biothin www.dail sa-andras 3. Serouss ing/
h ‘biothing’ the New York based architect Alisa drasek founded a trans-disciplinary lobratory that uses on the generative potential of computationystems for design. Her major intrest is the analysis elf organising and adaptive systems, which can come manifest in different scales.2 The structure of project is described as grown from self-modifying terns of vectors based on the electromagnetic ds. The initial comtutaions were done in the two entional plan then lifted with the microarching tions through frequencies of the sine functions. ach cell unit of the structeure, light and shadow d programming are realized through the realtionp between the angle of sinusoidal wace function ng parameters, direction and aperture size, metal d glass parts. The inner cocoon space structure is med by the dual charge trajectory of emerging rkets. The varying degrees of cohabitation been humans and art is possible in the spinning fibof the cocoon. Rearranging the exhibition space onsidered a series of probability events.3 Also, Six erent geometric systems were used to design the vilion, which were all steamed out of the main ck.Pavilion plans and the building of the traditiononcept of pictures have much in common - this st dynamic blueprint is closer to the music symbols mbedded algorithm and parameters relationship ween the depth of the ecology is the seed of sible physical and chemical process and adapt he site conditions. nsidering the reason for selected this as my case dy, it contains the flexbile nature in which the geetry allows for local adaption to the site (seroussi vilion is implanted into a steep hill). Also, the interive potential of this project is hugh which allows creation of the multi-functional pavilion.
ng’ – a transdisciplinary lobratory founded by Alisa Andrasek. http:// lytonic.com/biothing-a-transdisciplinary-lobratory-founded-by-alisek/ si Pavilion |Biothing. http://www.arch2o.com/seroussi-pavilion-bioth-
FIG. 5. seroussi pavilion. https://www.google.com.au/ search?q=Biothing+Pavilion&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiP9py-g6XWAhWMnZQKHW3GCgcQ_AUICygC&biw=1500&bih=895#imgrc=xbxPBvC0Zt8d0M:
FIG. 6. seroussi pavilion. https://www.google.com.au/ search?q=Biothing+Pavilion&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiP9py-g6XWAhWMnZQKHW3GCgcQ_AUICygC&biw=1500&bih=895#imgrc=A25KXQ-0j-_IaM:
FIG. 7. seroussi pavilion. https://www.google.com.au/ search?q=Biothing+Pavilion&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiP9py-g6XWAhWMnZQKHW3GCgcQ_AUICygC&biw=1500&bih=895#imgdii=OO2oCDhtsXkY8M:&imgrc=OO6SCPcIH5NDfM:
B. 2 CASE STUDY 2.1 ITERATION SERIES 1 CURVE DIVIDE
1.1
1.2
Change the number of segment of curve divided component to achieve the different field line generations and compositions.
CD=1 1.5
CD=2 1.6
CD=18
SERIES 2 RADIUS OF CIRCLE
2.1
CD=25 2.2
Change the radius of the circles then modify the spatial arrangement of each iterations.
R=-10
R=-3 2.5
2.6
R=2.5
R=5
1.3
1.4
CD=5
2.3
CD=10
2.4
R=0.01 2.7
R=1 2.8
R=10
R=15
B. 2 CASE STUDY 2.1 ITERATION SERIES 3 FIELD LINE
3.1
3.2
Change the size of fieldline to achieve the different form of shape.
3.5
SERIES 4 EXTRUDE + OFFSET
S=20
S=50 3.6
S=500
S=700
4.1
4.2
Add extrude and offset components to the original definition, change the value of x, y and z axis and offset distance to receive the distinctive structure.
X=0 Y=-3 Z=-8 D=0
X=0.25 Y=0.25 Z=0.25 D=0.80 4.5
X=0 Y=2.2 Z=0.2 D=9
4.6
X=6 Y=-3 Z=0 D=17
3.3
S=150
4.3
0
7
3.4
S=350
4.4
X=5 Y=7.8 Z=0.3 D=2.0
X=0.25 Y=1.8 Z=1.8 D=5.1 4.7
4.8
X=0 Y=0.3 Z=4.7 D=35
X=0 Y=0 Z=-8 D=20
B. 2 CASE STUDY 2.1 ITERATION SERIES 5 LUNCH BOX- PLATONIC OCTANEDON + MOVE
5.1
5.2
Plug in the component from lunch box, change the value of radius and curve divide numbers.
R=5
R=2 5.5
R=8 T=2 CD=2
SERIES 6 NEW GEOMETRY + PIPE
6.1
5.6
R=6 MOVE: X=6 Z=4 6.2
Creat a new base curve and produce the different geometry, add the pipe components, change the field line to test out the representation in vertical aspect. (the original highlights the horizontal strucutre at x and Y axis). R=0.3 FL=350 6.5
R=0.3 EXTRUDE: Z=7 FL=300
R=1.4 FL=350 6.6
R=0.3 EXTRUDE: X=7 Z=7
7 FL=300
5.3
5.4
R=5 CD=2 5.7
R=8 CD=1 5.8
R=7 CD=1 MOVE: X=8 Y=10 Z=7 6.3
R=6 CD=1 MOVE: X=-7 Y=6 Z=6 6.4
R=0.3 EXTRUDE: Y=8 FL=300 6.7
R=0.3 EXTRUDE: X=7 FL=300 6.8
R=1 EXTRUDE: X=7 Z=7 FL=300
CD=-6 R=1.4 EXTRUDE: X=7 Y=9 Z=3
B. 2 CA
ADAPTA
Could this design and sloped site c
FUNCTIO
The design space to contain variou provide multiple f
DYNAMI
The design space ture and vibrant the future, they c transformed easi
ASE STUDY 2.2 ITERATION SELECTIONS The following criteria assesses different algorithmic for mations according to the applicability and feaxibility of the design in response to the brief. The matrixs records the development of each species and more successful iterations could be further developed.
ABILITY
n adapt and react to rugged condition?
ONALITY
e should have high tolerance us kind of activity of users and function.
ICALLY
e should have flexible strucspatial organizations. Also, in can be developmented and ily.
AESTHETICS The design should have the ability to stimulate user’s creativity and emotion. Also, satisfy their visual enjoyment.
FABRICARABILITY
Could the design be pabricated easily with limited available equi[ment and computational skills?
B. 2 CASE STUDY 2.2 ITERATION SELECTIO
ITERATIONS 4.5 ADAPABILITY: AESTHETICS: FUNCTIONALITY: FABRICARABILITY: DYNAMICALLY:
ONS
ITERATIONS 4.7 ADAPABILITY: AESTHETICS: FUNCTIONALITY: FABRICARABILITY: DYNAMICALLY:
B. 2 CASE STUDY 2.2 ITERATION SELECTIO
ITERATIONS 5.4 ADAPABILITY: AESTHETICS: FUNCTIONALITY: FABRICARABILITY: DYNAMICALLY:
ONS
ITERATIONS 6.7 ADAPABILITY: AESTHETICS: FUNCTIONALITY: FABRICARABILITY: DYNAMICALLY:
B. 3 CASE STUDY 2.0 3.1 REVERSE ENG ICD/ITKE Research Pavilion 2010. In 2010, the Institute for Computational Design (ICD) and the Institute of Building Structures and Structural Design (ITKE) designed and constructed a temporary research pavilion. The innovative structure demonstrates the latest developments in material-oriented computational design, simulation, and production processes in architecture. The result is a bending-active structure made entirely of extremely thin, elastically-bent plywood strips.4 The research pavilio shows another way of computing design: in this case, the calculation of forms is driven directly by physical behavior and material characteristics. The structure is based entirely on the elastic bending characteristics of birch bars.These bands are mechanically made into planes and then joined together to make elastic bending and tight areas alternate in their length.The force of locally stored in each curved area of the strip, and maintained by the corresponding tensioned region of the adjacent belt, greatly increases the structural capability of the system. The computational design model is based on embedding the relevant material behavior characteristics into the parameter principle.These parametric dependencies are defined by a large number of physical experiments, focusing on the deflection of a thin plywood strip with elastic bending. The structural analysis model is based on finite element simulation.To simulate generated by the bending of each element of the complex balance of local store energy, the model need to start from the planar distribution of 80 bands, and then simulated with elastic bending and then coupling.Detailed structural calculation based on the specific modeling reflect the unique characteristics of the prototyping of mesh topology structure, can understand the material relative to the external forces (wind and snow) bending of internal stress load, calculation of light a very significant aspect of the structure.
4. ICD/ITKE Research Pavilion 2010. http://www.achimmenges.net/?p=4443
GINEERING
B. 3 CASE STUDY 2.0 3.1 REVERSE ENG
STEP 1: -draw the base line -offset the base circle -move at z axis.
STEP 2: -divided curve
STEP 3: -explode t
STEP 6: -create an interpolated curve through the set of points
STEP 7: -loft the arc
STEP 8: -set hexag (use polyg circle wor
GINEERING (DRAFT)
tree
STEP 4: -make arc trough three points
gonal frame gon 8 radius using rking plane )
STEP 9: -set second hexagonal frame (use another polygon 7 segments)
STEP 5: -construct the surface geodesic between two points.
B. 3 CASE STUDY 2.0 3.1 REVERSE ENG
STEP 1: -draw the base circle
STEP 2: -generate the number of equal spaces, parpendicular frame along curve
STEP 5: -convert the curve to polyline
STEP 6: -fillet the sharp corners of the curve
STEP 9: -rotate the object on the plane
STEP 10: -join the brep together
GINEERING (OPTIMIZED PROCESSES)
STEP 3: -create an ellipse define by base plane and two radii
STEP 7: -make the curve to planarity
STEP 4: -solve intersection events for the curve and plane
STEP 8: -create a surface by lofting the section curves
B. 4 CASE STUDY 2.0 3.2 ITERATION 1.1
1.2
1.3
-OFFSET: X=15 Y=20 Z=80 -INTERPOLATE: DISRANCE=9 -SD=3
-OFFSET: X=71 Y=20 Z=80 -INTERPOLATE: DISTANCE=9 -SD=3 -CR=70 -R1OF ELLIPSE =30 R2= 40
-OF -INT -SD -U(S
1.6
1.7
1.8
-OFFSET: X=30 Y=20 Z=10 -U=15 V=15 -CR=20 -R OF FILLET=50 -ROTATE ANGLE=50
-OFFSET: X=30 Y=20 Z=10 -U=20 V=20 -CR=20 -R OF FILLET=30
-OFFS -U=20 -CR= -R1=1 -R OF
SERIES 1 INTERPOLATE + OFFSET
FFSET: X=71 Y=20 Z=80 TERPOLATE: DISTANCE=9 D=3 SD)=15 V(SD)=15
SET: X=30 Y=20 Z=10 0 V=20 =20 10 R2=50 F FILLET=30
1.4
1.5
-OFFSET: X=2 Y=20 Z=80 -U(SD)=15 V(SD)=15 -ROTATE ANGLE=40
-OFFSET: X=2 Y=20 Z=20 -U(SD)=15 V(SD)=15 -CR=20 -R1=30 R2=50 -Z(PT)=20
1.9
-OFFSET: X=80 Y=20 Z=20 -U=20 V=20 -CR=40 -R1=10 R2=50 -Z(PT)= 20
B. 4 CASE STUDY 2.0 3.2 ITERATION SERIES 2 OFFSET + MESH UV + WB CARPET+ CHANGE CIRCLE TO POLYGON
2.1
-OFFSET: X=20 Y=88 -NUMBER OF PFRAME=67
2.2
-OFFSET: X=50 Y=80 -NUMBER OF PFRAME: 80
2.
-O -N
2.6
2.7
2.
-OFFSET: X=80 Y=20 Z=30 -NUMBER OF PFRAME=20
-OFFSET: X=10 Y=10 Z=80 -SEGMENT OF POLYGON=6 -NUMBER OF PFRAME=60
-O -S -N
.3
2.4
2.5
OFFSET: X=20 Y=88 NUMBER OF PFRAME: 30
-OFFSET: X=30 Y=20 Z=73 -NUMBER OF PFRAME: 20
-OFFSET: X=80 Y=20 Z=30 -NUMBER OF PFRAME: 20
.8
2.9
2.10
OFFSET: X=10 Y=10 Z=10 SEGMENT OF POLYGON=6 NUMBER OF PFRAME=60
-OFFSET: X=10 Y=10 Z=80 -SEGMENT OF POLYGON=8 -NUMBER OF PFRAME=90
-OFFSET: X=50 Y=80 Z=80 -SEGMENT OF POLYGON=8 -NUMBER OF PFRAME=20
B. 4 CASE STUDY 2.0 3.2 ITERATION SERIES 3 WB FRAME + WB THICKEN + REDRAW THE PLOYGON
3.1
3.2
3.
-THICKEN: D=71
-THICKEN: D=100 -FRAME: Y=94
-TH -FR
3.6
3.7
3.
-THICKEN: X=1 Y=18 Z=0 -FRAME: X=7 Y=100 Z=61 -NUMBER OF PFRAME=2 -Z(PT)=-8 -ROTATE ANGLE=40
-THICKEN: X=0 Y=29 Z=24 -FRAME: X=5 Y=100 Z=1 -MESH: U=15 V=66 -CR=82 -NUMBER OF PFRAME: 6 -R1=100 R2=20
-TH -FR -M -C -N -R
.3
3.4
3.5
HICKEN: D=16 RAME: Y=23 V=91
-THICKEN: D=16 -FRAME: X=25 Y=65 Z=79 -NUMBER OF PFRAME=8 -Z(PT)=-8 -ROTATE ANGLE=40
-THICKEN: Y=37 Z=34 -FRAME: Y=1 Z=100 -ROTATE ANGLE=40
.8
3.9
3.10
HICKEN: X=0 Y=10 Z=16 RAME: X=15 Y=100 Z=20 MESH: U=20 V=20 CR=82 NUMBER OF PFRAME: 6 R1=100 R2=20
-THICKEN: X=0 Y=90 Z=0 -FRAME: X=31 Y=66 Z=81 -MESH: U=20 V=20 -CR=82 -NUMBER OF PFRAME: 8 -R1=100 R2=20
-THICKEN: X=0 Y=6 Z=0 -FRAME: X=80 Y=1 Z=2 -MESH: U=20 V=20 -CR=82 -NUMBER OF PFRAME: 7 -R1=100 R2=20 -ROTATE ANGLE=67
B. 4 CASE STUDY 2.0 3.2 ITERATION SERIES 4 WB WINDOW + TOGGLED
4.1
4.2
-WINDOW: Y=3 -POLYGON SEGMENT= 7
-WINDOW: X=14 Y=29 -POLYGON SEGMENT= 7
4.6
-WINDOW: X=67 Y=24 Z=66 -POLYGON SEGMENT= 5 -NUMBER OF PFRAME= 4 -ROTATE ANGLE=100 -Z OF COORDINATE= 89
4.3
4.4
4.5
-WINDOW: X=21 Y=0 Z=0 -POLYGON SEGMENT= 7 -NUMBER OF PFRAME= 7
-WINDOW: X=29 Y=12 Z=0 -POLYGON SEGMENT= 7 -NUMBER OF PFRAME= 7 -ROTATE ANGLE=100 -Z OF COORDINATE= 4
-WINDOW: X=26 Y=23 Z=0 -POLYGON SEGMENT= 5 -NUMBER OF PFRAME= 7 -ROTATE ANGLE=88 -Z OF COORDINATE= -40
B. 4 CASE STUDY 2.0 3.2 ITERATION 4.1
4.2
-DICISION: U=2 V=10 -T=5
-DICISION: U=2 V=10 -T=5 -R OF PIPE: 5
4.6
4.7
-DICISION: U=2 V=10 -T=2 -R OF PIPE: 5 -R OF CIRCLE: 30 -NUMBER OF PFRAME: 46
-DICISION: U=2 V=10 -T=2 -R OF PIPE: 5 -R OF CIRCLE: 30 -NUMBER OF PFRAME: 10
SERIES 5 HEX + PIPE
4.3
4.4
4.5
-DICISION: U=2 V=5 -T=2 -R OF PIPE: 5
-DICISION: U=2 V=10 -T=2 -R OF PIPE: 5
-DICISION: U=2 V=10 -T=2 -R OF PIPE: 5 -R OF CIRCLE: 30 -NUMBER OF PFRAME: 10
4.8
4.9
4.10
-DICISION: U=2 V=10 -T=2 -R OF PIPE: 5 -R OF CIRCLE: 30 -NUMBER OF PFRAME: 46 -R1=30 R2=50
-DICISION: U=2 V=10 -T=5 -R OF PIPE: 8 -R OF CIRCLE: 70 -NUMBER OF PFRAME: 46 -R1=30 R2=50
-DICISION: U=8 V=10 -T=5 -R OF PIPE: 6 -NUMBER OF PFRAME: 46 -R1=30 R2=50
B. 4 CASE STUDY 2.2 ITERATION SELECTI
In this interation, the technique which aims to offset the interpolate pieces are demonstrated. The multi-layer folding panel show the high complexity and transparency to create the light efforts. The gaps bewteen the strips enhance the sense the space in this design. ITERATIONS 1.5 ADAPABILITY: AESTHETICS: FUNCTIONALITY: FABRICARABILITY: DYNAMICALLY: This interation is the one of the most obviously representation of strips and folding concept in my case study through the wb carpet command. The semi open space create strong contrast and the folding panel bring out the high dynamic feeling. ITERATIONS 2.6 ADAPABILITY: AESTHETICS: FUNCTIONALITY: FABRICARABILITY: DYNAMICALLY:
IONS
Same as the interation 2.6, this one i try to alter the offset sliders and the segments of polygon. There have the significant transformation than the last one. Also, there have some folding moments in each curving panel to create the special kind of ‘patterning’. ITERATIONS 2.7 ADAPABILITY: AESTHETICS: FUNCTIONALITY: FABRICARABILITY: DYNAMICALLY:
ITERATIONS 4.3 ADAPABILITY: AESTHETICS: FUNCTIONALITY: FABRICARABILITY: DYNAMICALLY:
This one i want to highlight the thicken material and surface patterning through the wb thicken and wb window frame. This kind of shape is more elegant and enhance the luxury feeling like a ‘crown’. The different position of each folding panel provide more possible space for functionality.
‘WHEN FLEXIBILITY MEET RIGID...’
B. 4 PROTOTYPING
It is often quite different when a design goes from digital to fabrication, and tha because our design intend to reflect the dynamic representaion in computatio techinical range in the architectural language and format which could be mo abstruct. In this part, we attempt to explore the possibilities to generate, constru and fabricate our design idea in reality through some prototypes.
TS
at onal ore uct
B. 5 PROTOTYPING PROTOTYPE 1.0
The first prototype focused on using the special connection method to fabricate an piece in our design in a regular tesselation shape fromed by the rigid strips.Also, this is the representaion of the fabrication of the curved surfaces by some smaller fragments. From the rhino file, we first unrolled each piece of trigulation to the two dimentional layout and laser cut this set of geometries. Given the limitation of the chosen material (mirror perspex), which the shared edges are always perpendicular, we used a more flexible meterial--metal wires to produce rings to act as the connection to join the each triangle fragment. It allows the flexibility to fold the rigid panels along each edges. In other way, we attempt to use this prototype to test and show the specific quality of the surface treatment and space transparency. This kind of materilal will bring out better light reflection and the hollow out triangle provide the sense of transparency vert well.
B. 5 PROTOTYPING PROTOTYPE 2.0
FIG. 9. The Chinese Fingerlock: Traps of the mind and how to be released from anxiety. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/chinese-fingerlocktraps-mind-how-released-from-anxiety-elaine-liu
B. 5 PROTOTYPING PROTOTYPE 2.0
STEP 1: -punching in each strips -fix all the strips in one end
STEP -fix th and od c shap we tr
Refer to the image which located of the prototype. If you’ve never se You place your index fingers in eith fingers. When you push your finger fingers outward, but this only tighte which enlarges the openings and force and reaction force throught achieve the stretch and elastic stru
5. Chinese Finger Traps: What a Novelty Item Can Teach Us a finger-traps-what-novelty-item-can-teach-us-about-accepta
2: he other end of the strips we find out that this methcannot produce the ideal pe and weaving pattern. so ry to change.
STEP3: -change the weaving method which let each panel interlaced many time before fixed. then we complete the ideal model.
at the first page of prototype 2.0, it shows that the finger trap is our inspiration een one, finger traps are woven bamboo tubes (check out the picture above). her end, and when you try 5to pull them out, the tube constricts, trapping your rs inward, it causes them to loosen. The initial reaction of the victim is to pull the ens the trap. The way to escape the trap is to push the ends toward the middle, frees the fingers. This produce designed based on the combination of applied t the special weaving method. This is really inspirative for our surface fabricate to ucure which special pattern also it is really siginificant in our future pitch design.
about Acceptance. http://portlandpsychotherapyclinic.com/2013/03/chineseance/
B. 6 DESIGN PROPOSAL
SITE STRATEGIES DIAGRAM KEY AMMENTITIES: -VICTORIA PARK -VICTORIA PARK TRAIN STATION (1520 MINS TO CBD) -EARLY LEARNING CENTER -COLLINGWOOD CHILDREN’S FARM -THE FARM CAFE -COLINGWOOD FARMERS MERKET -STUDLEY PARK BOATHOUSE -COMPUTER SHARE COPERATE OFFICE -YARRA BEND GOLF PARK -RESIDENTIAL BUILDING -RUNNING TOUTE -BIKE ROUTE KEY ACTIVITIES: -JOGGING -WALKING -CYCLING -NATURE APPRECIATION -FAMILY ACTIVITIES -EDUCATIONAL TRAINING
ABBOTSFORD
CLIFT
EASTERN FWY
A
TON HILL
AREA OF IMPLEMENTATION
KEW
SITE STRATEGIES DIAGRAM
LV x Supreme x
Boost midsole: 1. looks like foam 2. TPU(Thermal Receiver Unit) 3. Provide the extremely co r i a ce o u s re s i l i e n ce effect 4. Great cushioning effect 5. Strong cold-resistant and heat-resistant performance
CREDIT TO LU (GROUP MEMBER)
x Nmd Cs1
Primeknit shoe vamp: 1. Keep the air permeability 2. prevent the excessive the extension to protect the feet 3. integrated vamp to protect the feet 4. seamless connection to
Brand pattern: 1. classic LV monogram 2.Supreme’s Futura Bold 3.Gold and brown combination resembles the leather goods that LV is famously known for.
MATRIX OF ITERATIONS DEVELOPMENT SPRING FORCE GENERATED TENSILE STRUCTURE
VORONOI PATTERNED DIAMOND CHAMBERS
METABALLS
SELECTION OUTCOME
PARASITIC: FABRICATABILITY: PERMEABILITY: ENCAPSULABILITY: SMOTHNESS: ELASTICITY:
PARASITIC: FABRICATABILITY: PERMEABILITY: ENCAPSULABILITY: SMOTHNESS: ELASTICITY:
SELECTION OUTCOME
PARASITIC: FABRICATABILITY: PERMEABILITY: ENCAPSULABILITY: SMOTHNESS: ELASTICITY:
PARASITIC: FABRICATABILITY: PERMEABILITY: ENCAPSULABILITY: SMOTHNESS: ELASTICITY:
THE TRAP PROJECT BRIEF: To create a special pitch of the cabonon which owned by the people who wanna trap people in order to punish their curiosity. The structure of the pitch is parasitic and flexible which refer to our product and for the techinical aspects we take inspiration from the traditional finger trap which shown in prototype parts.
CREDIT TO MO LI (GROUP MEMBER)
P
SECTION
CREDIT TO MO LI (GROUP MEMBER)
CREDIT TO MO LI (GROUP MEMBER)
B.7 LEARNING OUTCOMES
I think part b stand the log It is also impo everything w hopper as an All the things were both co tally. It is reall hace to enco complicated tion and pote matrix tasks la In addition, a tions mean w and try to ma to help us to also feel the to transfer the prototypes te desired comp
is really challenging yet rewarding if we are silling to devote our time to undergic behind the parametric design tools and the concept of paramatric design. ortant to keep an open mind towards new ideas and design methods because will be pointless if we have preconception in the first place. I thought using grassn inituitive tool to generate the usable idea was nonsense. s that we learned in the lectures and studios, research studies and matrix tasks onceptually and pratically to help us create and compare our design horizonly usful and constrctive to our design development and transformations. We ourage to use different grasshopper plug-in in order to achieve some ideal d iterations. These method help us to discover the professional spatial composiential form. These knowledges and skills that we learned in research studies and aid the foundation for our project and stimulated our creativity. an other difficult thing in part b is connections and fabrications. The connecwe need to analysis the key performance of one trendy product in our real life ake connection and reflection in our part b design. It is the practical method think about the core characters of our design and how to let our audience connections. Also, the fabrications part means we need to learn about how e digital design to the physical model through the grasshopper definitions and est. So the problem that i have to deal with is to find the balance between our plex design and its constructability in real life context.
B.7 ALGORITHMIC SKETCHEBOOK
COCOON DESIGN 1.0
COCOON DESIGN 2.0
COCOON DESIGN 3.0
BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. FOLDED STRUCTURES IN MODERN ARCHITECTURE. University of Belgrade, Faculty of Architecture, Serbia 2. ‘biothing’ – a transdisciplinary lobratory founded by Alisa Andrasek. http:// www.dailytonic.com/biothing-a-transdisciplinary-lobratory-founded-by-alisa-andrasek/ 3. Seroussi Pavilion |Biothing. http://www.arch2o.com/seroussi-pavilion-biothing/ 4. ICD/ITKE Research Pavilion 2010. http://www.achimmenges.net/?p=4443 5. Chinese Finger Traps: What a Novelty Item Can Teach Us about Acceptance. http://portlandpsychotherapyclinic.com/2013/03/chinese-finger-traps-whatnovelty-item-can-teach-us-about-acceptance/