SynchroniCity

Page 1

S

c ity

1
unfu Y i . A bhin A v C h A mpA neri U rban a daptation of i ndigeno U s s patial a ttrib U t es
Y
ynchroni

S ynchroni c ity

U rban a daptation of i ndigeno U s s patial a ttrib U t es

Master of architecture, eMergent technologies and design

ArchitecturAl AssociAtion school of Architecture

Course Director : Course Director : Studio Master

Studio Tutor : Studio Tutor :

Michael Weinstock

George Jeronimidis

Evan Greenberg

Mehran Gharleghi

Wolf Mangelsdorf

MArch Candidates:

Yunfu Yi

Abhinav Champaneri

2 3

Architectural Association School of Architecture

Graduate School Programme

Programme:

Term:

Emergent Technologies and Design 04 (2012 -2014)

Student Name:

Yunfu Yi, Abhinav Champaneri

Submission Title:

SynchroniCity

Course Tutors:

Michael Weinstock, George Jeronimidis

Course Title:

Submission Date:

Emergent Technologies and Design, Master of Architecture 14.02.2014

Declaration:

‘‘ We certify that this piece of work is entirely our own and that any quotation or paraphrase from the published or unpublished work of others is duly acknowledged. ’’

Signature:

Yunfu Yi Abhinav Champaneri

4 5

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This thesis would have not been possible without sincere guidance and support from several individuals who contributed their expertise and experience to the project. First and foremost, we would like to express our utmost gratitude to our course directors; Michael Weinstock and George Jeronimidis, their commitment and support enabled us to constantly explore new dimensions in design and allowed us to take maximum advantage of the course. Their experience and assistance greatly helped us further our knowledge, skill and understanding in the field of architecture.

We take the pleasure to thank our Studio Masters, Evan Greenberg and our studio tutors, Mehran Gharleghi for their unfailing and consistent support, encouragement, advice and teaching throughout our Emtech course. We express our thanks to Wolf Mangelsdorf for sharing valuable insights to our study that enhanced our thesis. We also appreciate and thank our teammates Tejas Sidnal and Yuchen Wang for their contributions during the MSc. phase of the project which formed the groundwork for our current work. We are also grateful to the jury whose valuable comments helped us to evaluate our project critically.

Finally, we would like to thank our families for their constant support and encouragement as well as our EmTech classmates for their cheerful company, memorable experiences and moral support during this phase.

6 7
5

ABSTRACT

Synchronicity addresses the phenomenon of decline in spatial attributes in developing countries due to rapid urbanisation. The ambition is to establish a design system that reinterprets spatial logics and spatial identity associated with socio-cultural life into quantifiable parameters, and incorporates them with high density urban development. This would not only add social relevance but also create location specific architectural identity.

The process undertakes analysis of selected indigenous settings for their spatial attributes. The open spaces and built morphologies in these settings are studied as they are the embodiment of the local socio-cultural and environmental aspects. Innovative sampling methods are adopted to extract and convert spatial and organisational aspects into numeric parameters and geometric logics, which would be used in the computational design process.

The attempt focuses on the development of an evolutionary urban design model, which accommodates demographic pressures of density while retaining its spatial identity based on former settlements. Organizational aspects like spatial hierarchy and

open space distribution are referenced from the local settings to be embedded into the new urban morphology. The system would operate in two levels; in the first stage optimised geometries would be generated and catalogued. The catalogue would constitute geometries differentiated in terms of spatial and density attributes to suit different urban requirements. These catalogue geometries would be applied in actual urban scenarios with site constraints of boundary conditions, density and network patterns and programmatic requirements. The ability of these geometries to mitigate and modify to suit differentiated site conditions would be tested in this stage.

The system elaborately intertwines bottom–up and top-down approaches for application within urban scenario. This takes into consideration the emergent aspects occurring in the bottom-up approach and the top-down imposed architectural objectives for the site. The intelligence of the system would be based on taking into consideration the local settings, the urban demographic demands, the capacity/limitations of the catalogue geometries and the architectural ambitions. The attempt would be to generate, with the same system, differentiated result for varying urban scenarios.

8 9
7
10 11 10-17 7 5 18-35 36-49 50-65 CONTENTS
4 Domain Methods Analysis Of Existing Vernacular Settlements Appendix Bibliography Introduction Abstract Acknowledgement 82-101 124-211 212-237 272-275 238-271 66-81 6
8 5 Critical & Comparative Analysis Cluster Level Catalogue Generation Neighbourhood Level Design Development Block Level Catalogue Generation 7.1 Initial Experiments 7.2 Site Research 7.3 Aggregation 7.4 Network Generation 7.5 Block Differentiation 7.6 Programmatic Variation 2.1 Spontaneous Adaptation of Indigenous Settlements 2.2 Precedents- Designed Indigenous Projects in Urbanized Context 2.3 Precedents- High-rise Residential Typology 2.4 Precedents- Urban Growth Patterns in Beijing and Mumbai 2.5 Precedents- Evolutionary Urban Morphologies 2.6 Conclusion 2.7 Architectural Ambition 20 22 28 30 32 34 35 3.1 Proposed Design Methodology 3.2 Associative Techniques Design Aspects Parameters 3.3 Generative Techniques 38 40 41 43 46 4.1 Indigenous Settlements Overview and Design Logic 4.2 Indigenous Settlements : Parametric Study 4.3 Conclusion 54 67 81 5.1 Design Inputs 5.2 Experiments 5.3 Block Generation 5.4 Block Level Catalogue 5.5 Conclusion 84 86 89 96 99 6.1 Aggregation 6.2 Design Inputs 6.3 Generation Process 6.4 Cluster Level Catalogue 6.5 Conclusion 104 110 114 119 121 7.1.1 Experiment I - Density Variation and Emergent Spaces 7.1.2 Experiment II - Cluster Adjacencies in Aggregation 7.1.3 Experiment III - Cluster Modification for Boundary Adaptation 138 142 144 7.2.1 Beijing - Site Overview and Analysis 7.2.2 Mumbai - Site Overview and Analysis 7.2.3 Conclusions and Site Specific Ambitions 150 154 158 7.3.1 Experiment IV Cluster Organisation 7.3.2 Mumbai Aggregation 7.3.3 Beijing Aggregation 162 164 170 7.4.1 Network Generation Principal Criteria 7.4.2 Network Generation : Mumbai 7.4.3 Network Generation : Beijing 178 180 184 7.5.1 Block Differentiation Criteria 7.5.2 Block Differentiation Mumbai 7.5.3 Block Differentiation Beijing 190 192 196 7.6.1 Local Level Retail Units 7.6.2 Corporate Large Scale Establishments 202 208 8.1 Conclusions 8.2 System Evaluation and Future Prospects 213 233
1 2 3
7
10 11 Introduction SynchroniCity Indigenous Settlements Urban Sprawl Phenomenon Urbanisation and Population Growth Thesis Overview 14 15 16 17 1INTRODUCTION

The Complexity

Cities happen to be problems in organised complexity. They presentsituationsinwhichseveraldozenquantitiesareallvarying simultaneouslyandsubtlyinterconnectedways.Thevariablesare manybuttheyarenothelterskelter;theyare“interrelatedintoan organicwhole.”[1]

-Jane Jacobs, the Death and Life of Great American Cities

Cities are complex systems which according to Herbert A. Simon (The Architecture of Complexity, 1962) is made up of large number of parts that interact in a non- simple, non-linear manner[2] Cities exist in layers of information which constitute the dense system of infrastructural networks, movement patterns, environmental responses, socio-cultural aspects, human behaviour and many more. The interrelations between these are expressed by the built and open spaces that form the architecture of the place. The success of architecture therefore depends on the right balance and integration that these elements are able to establish within themselves.

The current trend of urbanisation puts a lot of pressure on the balance of these systems. To accommodate the growing density certain elements within the city system get undermined or sacrificed. In most cases the neglected elements are those that have the least economic impact. Open spaces in this regard suffer the most in terms of both quality and quantity, as the short term economic gain to encroach these spaces is the highest. However, the socio-economic and socio-cultural impact in the long run is severe where the liveability of the city goes down drastically. This trend is very prominent in the developing countries that face rapid urbanisation.

A new urban design model of development is required which better prioritises the delicate balance between the various elements and

12 13 Introduction SynchroniCity
Fig 1.2 Image showing the vernacular settlement threatened by the urban infrastructure Fig 1.1 : The Besieged Settlements Around the City Fig 1.3: Traditional Shikumen Buildings Besieged by Urban Architectures in Shanghai [1]. Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. In Batty, M. Introduction p.01 Cities and Complexities-Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent Based Models and Fractals, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts [2]. Simon, H.A. (1962). The Architecture of Complexity, In Batty, M. Cities and Complexities-Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent Based Models and Fractals, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Indigenous Settlements

Mumbai, India Beijing, China

layers of a city. A significant aspect is therefore integrating quality of space with the ever increasing demographic demands. Apart from environmental factors, socio-cultural relevance should also be included in defining quality of space.

The thesis approaches the subject keeping this as the primary focus. In this regard spatial attributes of indigenous settings are studied where socio- cultural aspects have architectural adaptation or vice- versa. These would serve as references for developing an urban fabric with a new logic.

Indigenous Settlements

Indigenous settlements of a place hold unique features and characteristics (Fig 1.4). They are unique because they are the embodiment of the local socio-cultural aspects and local

environmental responses. In most cases they are also low energy responses which are based on situational availability of material and existing geography. All these aspects give the setting a distinct architectural identity, missing from most modern day development. It is on this identity that the three essential aspects are based: the adaptation and evolution of built form to efficiently perform in the existing environmental conditions, the accommodation of sociocultural aspects with the built form and lastly the integration and relation of built and open spaces in terms of organisation within the fabric. Successful examples based on these aspects would be studied and analysed parametrically to derive ideal built–open affiliations and compared with contemporary models emerging in the urban scenarios in major cities of developing countries like India and China.

Mumbai, India Beijing, China

Urban Sprawls

Urban sprawls of today hold a completely contrary situation (Fig 1.5). The pressure to achieve higher densities results in better and more efficient infrastructure. However, its architectural identity does not present attributes that correspond to its location. It is because of this that the urban sprawl takes a homogeneous architectural character, where the built configuration in any new development looks standardised and similar. The urban agglomeration boasts of economic prowess and technological advancement but is also the centre of high energy consumption, pollution and traffic problems.

Even so, urbanisation is an inevitable phenomenon because of the opportunities that it provides in terms of occupation and lifestyle. Because of this, cities would always be under demographic pressure to create more usable space. The demand for this space results in

creating spaces that are more compact and efficient in terms of economic gains but not in terms of quality. The spaces that suffer most are the informal open spaces that would potentially represent the socio-cultural aspect and improve the liveability of the place. The lack of these spaces creates an abrupt transition from public to private and leaves no scope for informal semi-public spaces. To understand this trend we look at sites where indigenous character with rich spatial attributes is under pressure of getting converted into homogeneous urban sprawl. A number of architects address this problem at an architectural level as well as at an urban level which we discuss in Chapter 2: Domain. However, a comprehensive approach that takes into consideration not only the quantity of built and un-built spaces but also their interrelation, socio-cultural connotation and quality aspects are still missing.

14 15 Introduction SynchroniCity
1.4
Phenomenon
Fig
Urban Sprawl
Fig 1.5

Urbanisation and Population Growth

[3] World Health Organisation, Urban Population Growth (2009) Available from: [http://www.who. int/gho/urban_health/situation_trends/urban_ population_growth_text/en/]

[Accessed 10 June 2013]

[4] United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, World Urbanisation Prospects (2011) Available from: [http://esa.un.org/unup/Maps/maps_ urban_2011.htm]

[Accessed 10 June 2013]

Global Aspects

According to World Health Organisation“Forthefirsttimeever,themajorityoftheworld’spopulationlives inacity,andthisproportioncontinuestogrow.Onehundredyears ago,2outofevery10peoplelivedinanurbanarea.By1990,less than40%oftheglobalpopulationlivedinacity,butasof2010, morethanhalfofallpeopleliveinanurbanarea.By2030,6outof every10peoplewillliveinacity,andby2050,thisproportionwill increaseto7outof10people.Currently,aroundhalfofallurban dwellersliveincitieswithbetween100000-500000people,and fewerthan10%ofurbandwellersliveinmegacities.’’[3]

The global urban phenomenon shows emergence of significant number of new cities with population greater than million. The statistics show that a large part of this new urbanisation would be concentrated in developing countries like China and India where the economic growth has ushered a wave of urban expansion. It is predicted that a total of 81 new cities would emerge by 2025 in China and India, apart from this 289 cities in China and India would hold a population of more than million. As a result both the countries would be investing significant resources into city building. In these countries up until 1980’s less than 25% of the population was urbanised and by 2025 the urbanised population would reach 75%. Both the countries had an agrarian economy where most of the population resided in the rural regions. Urbanisation has driven

a significant shift in this matter and in most cases it is the rural villages that are getting converted into urban cores. This shift is evident from the statistics shown in Fig 1.3.1 where there is a drastic decline in the rural areas and a proportional increase in urban settlements.

Urbanisation is closely linked to modernisation, industrialisation, and the sociological process of rationalisation. This rationalisation results in replacement of indigenous socio-cultural aspects or values which are motivators for behaviour in society with calculated ones. This is most commonly seen in the modern day conversion of indigenous settings into urban systems where the rate of this shift into urbanisation brings into demand a lot more usable floor space. This pressure of development results in creating urban cores that are economically beneficial, but most lack the architectural cohesion with the local urban fabric. Most of the new urban developments are created with the singular inclination to create higher usable floor space and to create a global identity, with rare consideration to space quality. Even if this is a consideration, they do not hold any aspects of local / indigenous settlement into context, the socio-cultural reference for architecture goes down and the economical factors take over. Therefore the development lacks local identity and is devoid of architectural aspects that can make it unique from other developments around the world.

Thesis Overview

The transition of a settlement from rural to urban in most cases is drastic and the new development is alienated from all aspects of the former settlement. The development would relate more to the local settings if certain rich aspects of indigenous settlement can be applied in the new urban context, to add a socio-cultural reference which in most new developments is missing. The investigation therefore is into an alternative urban design model that looks to generate a high density setting which derives its spatial attributes keeping the local and indigenous settlements in context. The overall ambition would be to test and analyse indigenous spatial logics and define methods to successfully integrate these with the modern day urban fabric which is under constant demographic pressure. The emphasis of the intervention would be the socio-cultural aspects that convert into architectural morphology or vice versa.

The attempt would be to convert these socio-cultural aspects of morphology into parametric data to inform the design level.

The exploration is divided into three parts: The first part of the investigation shall be based around studying indigenous settings in China and India with open spaces as the focus. The criteria to select these settings would be based on sites that possess spatial configurations that are unique to the indigenous setting, have the ability to encourage social interactions and are important for their cultural settings. The spaces would be studied in terms of both experiential and environmental aspects that contribute to their successful working. The second part deals with using these spatial logics in form of extracted parameters. System logic for design would be developed with the help of experiments and exercises. This system

logic uses the extracted parameters to define spaces in high density scenarios.

The derived architectural models will be tested and compared with contemporary models existing around the world. The third part would look at the design at an urban level where the architectural shall be integrated into the urban fabric keeping both the sociocultural aspects of space and the urban demands in consideration. The parameters and organisation of open spaces in indigenous settings would be used to inform space generation in the urban context. The design at this stage will be further informed by other aspects that augment urban systems in terms of connectivity, density management, programmatic distribution and environmental compatibility to produce morphologies that have high spatial quality and improve liveability.

16 17 Introduction SynchroniCity
1960 2011 Percentage urban / urban agglomerations by size class [4] Fig 1.6 2025 1980 0-25% 25-50% 50-75% 75-100% 1-5 million 5-10 million 10 million or more City Population Percentage Urbanized

DOMAIN

This chapter focusses on examples that hold semblance to the chosen subject; it is based on different cases which depict the current trend of development in the urban scenario: (a) the phenomena of spontaneous alterations to vernacular settlements during population densification and the subsequent change in architectural character because of this. (b) the current efforts in design practice to reproduce certain notable aspects of vernacular or indigenous settings in an urban scenario and (c) ‘state of the art’ examples where buildings are designed to accommodate green spaces within high rise buildings to function as social spaces. The chapter also analyses the precedents in evolutionary computational processes used for generating urban morphologies. The aim is to critically evaluate the pros/ cons of all the practices stated above and to propose an approach that synthesizes their advantages in both environmental and socio-cultural aspects.

2.1 Spontaneous Adaptation of Indigenous Settlements

2.2 Precedents- Designed Indigenous Projects in Urbanized Context

2.3 Precedents- High-rise Residential Typology

2.4 Precedents- Urban Growth Patterns in Beijing and Mumbai

2.5 Precedents- Evolutionary Urban Morphologies

2.6 Conclusion

2.7 Architectural Ambition

18 19 Domain SynchroniCity 2
20 22 28 30 32 34 35

In the urbanisation process, there is always a massive migration of rural population into cities. The migration causes infrastructural and demographic pressure on the city. This trend can be observed in Mumbai since 1950s and in Beijing since mid 1970s. The population tripled in several decades and up to now these two urban agglomerations accommodate over 20 million dwellers each. The increasing demand on land resulted in autonomous densification; the fenced plot in Mumbai and courtyard buildings in Beijing are no longer owned by single household, but instead turned into multi-family compound. Extensions are built in the open spaces in order to maximize floor area. This trend is indicated in Ranwar Village Mumbai where the semi-public has reduced from 31% (Fig 2.1.1) of plot area to 15% (Fig 2.1.2) and also in a typical

As a consequence, the horizontal infill development mode succeeded in responding to the demand of density at the cost of deteriorating environmental as well as socio-cultural qualities of the spaces as these autonomous adaptations were often reported to have poor solar admittance or over-proximity between houses. This not only affects the spatial attributes of the place but also liveability of the city as a whole.

20 21 Domain SynchroniCity 2.1 Spontaneous
Adaptation of Indigenous Settlements
Fig 2.1.1 Private Open Space in 1948 (Ranwar Village, Mumbai)
Private Open Space 31% Private Open Space 15% Private Open Space 38% 1975 1980 1990 Private Open Space 29% Private Open Space 14% Typical chronological modification to single storey large courtyard unit in Beijing
Fig 2.1.2 Private Open Space in 2010 (Ranwar Village, Mumbai) Fig 2.1.3 Courtyard for semi public activities Fig 2.1.4 Encroached courtyard to accommodate dwellings
21 16. 19.
Fig 2.1.5 courtyard house located in Dashilar Area of Beijing where the semi public space is reduced from 38% to 14% (Fig 2.1.5). This has been a noticeable trend in most of the indigenous settings as these places originally had high percentage of open space dedicated to the household.

2.2 Precedents- Designed Indigenous Projects In Urbanized Context

Belapur Housing Project

Housing Project

New Mumbai, India, 1983-1986

The Belapur Housing Project is derived from the indigenous dwelling configuration (Fig 2.2.1) with one overriding principle that each unit has its own individual site to allow for expansion. The design was made by Architect Charles Correa to embody the basic attributes of a typical traditional Indian dwelling. The scheme caters to a wide range of income groups from the lowest up to the affluent.

The main concept was based on the abstract idea of hierarchical organisation of clusters and the open spaces: 6-8 fenced residential units aggregate around an open space and form a cluster with central courtyard (Fig 2.2.3) These clusters are further aggregated

around a larger public space. Spatial qualities such as shading property were taken into elaborate consideration during the design process.

The organisation of clusters forms well-bedded spatial hierarchy (Fig 2.2.4) with remarkable fractal patterns (Fig 2.2.5) Although the project embodies value in reinterpreting vernacular spatial configuration and some of the spatial qualities, the adaptation into high density context seems not to be the aim of the project. The inherited low density model is not be able to accommodate the increasing demographic pressure. Therefore the project is more of a replication of the existing rural typology

22 23 Domain SynchroniCity
Covered Semi-public Area Residential Unit Private Public Open Semi Public Area Shared Courtyard Playground level Open space Neighbourhood level Open space Residential Unit Living Area Toilet Type A Type B Type C Type D
Fig 2.2.1 View of typical courtyard in a cluster Hierarchy of open spaces within the site Fig 2.2.4 Hierarchy of open spaces within the site Fig 2.2.5
8x 6x
View of typical cluster with a courtyard Fig 2.2.3 Fig 2.2.2 21.
22.

2.2 Precedents- Designed Indigenous Projects In Urbanized Context

Ju’er Hutong Courtyard Housing Project

Ju’er Hutong Courtyard Housing Project (World Habitat Award winner 1993) is generally regarded by far the most thorough attempt to reinterpret essence of vernacular dwelling via a quadrangle courtyard-like typology (Fig 2.2.12) The scheme attempts to accommodate the increasing population density in urbanized Beijing via fixed two and three storey height new courtyard housing. The two and three storey courtyard house is proved to be an optimal low-rise typology that achieves FAR 1.28 which is same as four storey slab (stripe) building or six storey tower (point) building. The construction of 46 new homes also increased the average per capita living space from 5.3 m2 to 12.4 m .

Despite the success in accommodating the extra density, extruding

single-storey courtyard typology into multi-level means that the introverted courtyard which used to be owned by 4 households turned into common-owned space that is shared up to 18 families, This results in over-surveillance of the activities in courtyard as 18 households watch the activities.

24 25 Domain SynchroniCity
Fig 2.2.12 View of typical courtyard in a cluster Beijing, China, 1988 Ju’er Hutong Courtyard Housing Project Fig 2.2.13 View of typical courtyard in a cluster Fig 2.2.14 View of typical courtyard in a cluster Fig 2.2.15 Isometric view showing a typical block typology

2.2 Precedents- Designed Indigenous Projects In Urbanized Context

Asian Games Village

Asian Games Village

New

Asian Games Village was built in 1982 to house athletes of the games. 500 housing units were designed as group housing on 35 acres of land. The aim was to create an urban pattern of low rise high density, with high level of interconnected shaded passages (Fig 2.2.10) Courtyard morphology is formed by mirroring the merging blocks along orthogonal axes, responding to climatic and social needs. The streets are consciously broken up into visually comprehensible units, often with gateways, bringing about pauses, point of rest and changing vistas.

The project possesses merits in providing shading performance by abundant concave-convex transformation in shape and by courtyard morphology, and moreover, in creating high FAR value

via low rise residence typology. Despite the success in architecture typology scale, the project failed to hold a critical viewpoint in neighbourhood scale. The courtyards in each building cluster are directly linked to the motorway, creating typical modern trafficoriented street rather than traditional mixed-use streets. While the latter is proved to be an indispensable socio-cultural element that eliminate rapid transit traffic and encourage social activities. The shading analysis (Fig 2.2.11) show that through out the day, the internal courtyard provides a very good shading from the sun.

26 27 Domain SynchroniCity
Fig 2.2.7 Ariel view of Asian Games Village Delhi, India, 1982 Fig 2.2.10 View of courtyard in residential buildings Fig 2.2.9
9 am 12 pm 6 pm
Individual Building Block forming shaded court in the centre Block arrangement forming various sizes of shaded courts in the centre Fig 2.2.8 Semi-public space Private space Top view showing streets intersections and internal courts Fig 2.2.11
28.
Shading analysis on residential blocks

2.3 Precedents- High-rise Residential Typology

Under - Construction High-rises with Multi Level Open Spaces

A number of architectural practises around the world are attempting to integrate green spaces at multiple levels in new high rise buildings. The proposals like Mahanakhon in Thailand by OMA (Fig 2.3.1) The Cloud in Seoul (Fig 2.3.2) and Sky village in Rødovre by MVRDV (Fig 2.3.3) are some examples of growing trend arising all over the world where significance of providing semi –public open spaces has been recognised.

The proposals incorporate these spaces at multiple levels as pockets of social spaces. These levels of interactive spaces have disappeared from most modern urban scenarios, realizing the significance of these spaces has led architects to design such options. These serve as attractions for the buyers, as such spaces provide green, garden

like spaces in close proximity to their residence, a luxury not common in the high density, high rise scenario.

The intent for such development seems justified considering the current trend of development, where very limited amount of quality open space is found in cities. However the method of integrating these spaces is questionable, most of the green spaces are not designed for semi-public activities, they are mere terraces or balconies converted into sky gardens. The spaces are extroverted which lack visual privacy and therefore fail to become part of the household. Design of these spaces lack environmental and socio considerations factors that differentiate them from other public spaces.

28 29 Domain SynchroniCity
Under construction Residential, retail, hotel 314m 150,000 m 2015 Status: Type: Height: Floor area: Est. completion:
Fig 2.3.1 Design proposal by OMA, Mahanakhon in Thailand Fig 2.3.2 Design proposal by OMA, Mahanakhon in Thailand Fig 2.3.6 Design proposal by MVRDV, Sky Village in Rødovre Fig 2.3.5 Design proposal by MVRDV, Sky Village in Rødovre Fig 2.3.4 Design proposal by MVRDV, Cloud in Seoul Fig 2.3.3 Design proposal by MVRDV, Cloud in Seoul

Precedents- Urban Growth Patterns in Beijing and Mumbai

The exponential urban growth in both the cities has given rise to large scale residential development to sustain the population growth. In a haste to provide dwelling western design models are being applied without considering the local settings in terms of cultural aspects and environmental adaptability. As a result high rise typologies dominate the construction scene of both these locations. These buildings are not based on the local context and can be seen in any other part of the world.

Economic benefits dominate other incentives and therefore spatial aspects, environmental aspects and socio-cultural aspects remain ignored. Further, there are no researches or studies performed to analyse the impact of these typologies.

In terms of urban development there is a similar trend. The city developmental plans are manipulated to appease economic aspects. The buildings are built as segregated entities independent of the impact on surroundings. This has resulted in a sprawl of multi-storey apartments with no form of spatial or environmental considerations. This growing number of multi-storey buildings creates inferior and congested urban environments that don’t relate to the human scale and thereby reduce liveability of these cities.

30 31 Domain SynchroniCity 2.4
Fig 2.4.2 Typical Blocks for Slum Rehabilitation Projects in Mumbai Fig 2.4.3 Urban Development Patterns in Mumbai Fig 2.4.4 Construction in Beijing Fig 2.4.5 Construction in Beijing Fig 2.4.1 Residential Development in Beijing

2.5 Precedents - Evolutionary Urban Morphologies Comparison on Generation Logic Process Analysis

This chapter analyses various academic research projects that adopt evolutionary design methods to create context based urban systems. The comparative study illustrates the observation and differences between 3 precedents in evolutionary urban morphology. They are:

Geometry based Aggregation

The aggregation logics are developed according to the local geometries which are embedded with optimum values of certain parameters.

In Associative Design, the courtyard units deformation results in local geometries with quadrangle/ pentagon footprint. And since the inner angles of the polygons vary from each other, the junction where adjacent blocks meet could be T/X shaped with various intersecting angles.

Metabolism and Culture on the other hand, developed a deformation- free aggregation logic that is based on the packing of approximate bounding geometries. This novel strategy guarantees the local parameters from being affected by the geometry distortion. Nevertheless, the influences of neighbour geometry condition was left unaddressed.

It is also noticeable that top-down interference was introduced during programmatic distribution.

One more example we analysed is Autonomous Infrastructures It is also featured by an elaborated enshrinement of top-down and bottom-up approaches. The site footprint was sub-divided into small quadrangle patches. And they are categorised according to a square-diamond distortion level in which way the qualities of geometries could be guaranteed by minimising the total distortion level.

Block Generation

Block Generation

Cluster Footprint

Cluster Catalogue

Neighbourhood

Neighbourhood

Neighbourhood Sub-division Tessellation

Block Catalogue Cluster Footprint

[6] Wang, Z., WANG,L., Associative Design (2009) Available from: [http://http://www.dysturb.net/2007/ associative-design-berlage/], Berlage-Institute [Accessed on 25 October 2013]

[7] Nasseri,F., Mousavi, Y., Metabolism and Culture (2012), MArch Thesis, Emergent Technologies and Design, AA School of Architecture. [8] Chehab,A., Makkouk, M., Autonomous Infrastructures (2013), MArch Thesis, Emergent Technologies and Design, AA School of Architecture.

32 33 Domain SynchroniCity
with Moderate Distortion Programmatic Uses Distribution Distortion with 90° Angles Geometry Differentiation Re-organisation Bottom Up Bottom Up Top Down Aggregation with Emergent Spaces Distortion of Regular Grid Programmatic Distribution Bottom Up Top Down Cluster Catalogue Block Generation Block Generation Block Catalogue Cluster Footprint Cluster Footprint Neighbourhood Neighbourhood Neighbourhood Sub-division Tessellation with Moderate Distortion Programmatic Uses Distribution Distortion with 90° Angles Geometry Differentiation Re-organisation Bottom Up Bottom Up Top Down Aggregation with Emergent Spaces Distortion of Regular Grid Programmatic Distribution Bottom Up Top Down Cluster Catalogue Block Generation Block Generation Block Catalogue Cluster Footprint Cluster Footprint Neighbourhood Neighbourhood Neighbourhood Sub-division Tessellation with Moderate Distortion
Uses Distribution Distortion with 90° Angles Geometry Differentiation Re-organisation Bottom Up Bottom Up Top Down Aggregation with Emergent Spaces
of Regular Grid
Distribution Bottom Up Top Down Associative Design [5] Recursive Aggregation Process Quadrangles/ Pentagons Plot Footprint Shape Distorted Geometry Deformation T/X Junction Emergent Attributes X Junction Bottom-Up Generation Strategy Bottom-Up/ Top-Down Bottom-Up/ Top-Down Public Spaces Linear Squares Non-distorted Linear Quadrangles Distorted Metabolism and Culture [6] Autonomous Infrastructures [7]
Programmatic
Distortion
Programmatic
Fig 2.5.1 Associative Design: Berlage Institute Fig 2.5.4 Recursive Design Approach Fig 2.5.2 Metabolism and Culture: AA EmTech Fig 2.5.5 Emergent Public Spaces Fig 2.5.3 Autonomous Infrastructures: AA EmTech Fig 2.5.6 Distortion levels are showed in different colours

2.6 Conclusion

The study and evaluation of the developmental trends and methods form the basis of our design intervention. It provides understanding of the drawbacks of the current trends and provides clues to resolve and define a comprehensive approach. All cases of development seen in the first four chapters have one or the other, singular dominant aspect which they try to achieve and therefore the design models seem incomplete or inadequate. A successful design intervention would be one that is able to balance and integrate density, functionality and space quality. Referencing space definition to social structures existing in the place not only adds relevance to the design but also justifies functionality.

Significant effort is put into city and architectural design to accommodate high quality urban spaces. A conscious effort to innovate in terms to locating green spaces is made so as to improve availability and accessibility to these open spaces. Defining quality not only as aesthetically and environmentally suitable but also socially adaptive and relevant is essential. In this respect significance

to type of connectivity to such spaces is vital as different kind of open spaces would require differential levels of connectivity, an aspect not addressed in most modern day design proposals. Therefore the location of open spaces in the network of movement system plays an important role as it defines transitioning and travel experience. In most proposals there is a hard boundary between the private and the public, marked by perimeter boundaries. This limits the interaction between the built forms and the connecting routes which limits the prospects to form informal social spaces. This consideration would significantly improve the social aspects of urban spaces.

The analysis of precedents in evolutionary urban design shows the potential of addressing multiple design aspects as well as looking into the complexity. The design would be in context of modern urban situation where densification is persistent and inevitable. The design proposal would be a medium rise, high density approach that gives high consideration to space quality and references its spatial logics to successful typologies in indigenous settings.

2.7 Architectural Ambition

The architectural ambition gets informed by three core factors: the requirement of high density city fabrics, the depletion of open space ratios in new urban development and lack of high quality, accessible and socially relevant open spaces. Therefore, project aims at researching and developing a comprehensive design methodology that incorporates the above mentioned aspects with modern urbanisation. The primary focus will be on open space quality and their organisation. The project in this regard looks at testing and incorporating successful spatial attributes of indigenous settings in high density fabric of cities.

There are two essential parametric aspects that the project has to consider: density and quality. Density refers to floor area ratio and the aim would be to achieve the best possible value with certain desired quality. The quality aspects for the project would be defined by the environmental parameters, experiential factors and socio-cultural aspects. These aspects will be investigated on the built – open relations with respect to privacy, connectivity, space

definition and spatial organisation. Semi-public spaces will be integrated at multiple levels within the built form, to improve their accessibility and functionality. At the same time, they will act as thresholds in transition from the public to the private spaces. The organisation of all open spaces in the fabric would be on the basis to create spatial hierarchy and connectivity. The connectivity network would be predominantly pedestrian; therefore proximities will be an important factor to consider in all design decisions. Another feature of the design would be to create a continuous pedestrian social network at the ground level, the activities of this would vary based on programmatic distribution in the locality.

The design ambition would be to derive a system that generates morphologies that account for socio-cultural, environmental and contextual factors. The system must be adaptable to different site requirements and pressures so as to accommodate specificities such as variable densities, socially relevant spaces, boundary conditions and programmatic aspects.

34 35 Domain SynchroniCity

3

METHODS

This chapter defines the modes and methods adopted for various parts of the process: research, analysis, design and evaluation. It describes the logic system that will be tested in the thesis, the process driven urban design will utilise the tools at different stages of design development. Details of both digital tools and non-computational approaches that will be implemented in the process are explained, their limitations and the calibration appropriated to overcome the limitations are also discussed.

3.1 Proposed Design Methodology

3.2 Associative Techniques

Design Aspects

Parameters

3.3 Generative Techniques

36 37 Methods SynchroniCity
38 40 41 43 46

The growing understanding of cities, coupled with the desire to make them more efficient and effective has resulted in adopting Computational City Design as a way to design, analyse and simulate urban situations. The capacity of the system allows for simultaneous processing of large amounts of data and generates more realistic and accurate solutions. It also generates a large number of possible morphologies for the evaluation process.

The thesis proposes a combination of both top-down and bottom-up approaches which uses spatial logics, environmental responses and socio-cultural aspects as parameters to inform the urban system. The combined analysis-and-design method will be used for conceiving high-density neighbourhoods that support these parameters and also mitigate present urban issues.

Analysis

Catalogue Generation

Analysis Architectural Design

Case Studies Site Studies

Demographic Pressures

Density Gradients

Network Patterns

Programmatic Aspects

Extracted Design Logic and Parameters

The first part of the study identifies two sites which are culturally and environmentally different but experience constant demographic pressures. In this context we will study development in China and India where urbanisation has taken its toll on urban space quality. In these locations, characteristics of ideal, indigenously present social spaces are identified for integration into the urban model. To use the logic of these spaces in the urban scenarios, information is needed in the form of computable data. Therefore parameters that describe such spaces in terms of morphology and organisation are extracted through various analytical tools. Parameters include extraction of simple demographic data using computational tools and organisational data to describe situation based aspects of these the spaces within the wider fabric. The next part will focus on exercises and experiments with the extracted parameters which will

help us define our design strategy. The first stage of design will deal with building level implementation of space logics and optimising aspects such as space quality, environmental efficiency and density. By utilising an evolutionary engine, a catalogue of optimized buildings will be created. The generated options will then be evaluated against contemporary models. Following this, aggregation logics will be researched to develop clusters with different attributes. At this stage the focus will be on block-block relationship where interrelationships and organisational patterns at local level will be defined. Like in the case of blocks a higher level catalogue of clusters will be defined.

These catalogues provide the skeletal features of blocks and clusters. These would be tested by applying them in neighbourhood level generation. The adaptability of

Neighbourhood Level

Demographic Pressures

Density Gradients

Network Patterns

Programmatic Aspects

Neighbourhood Level

Architectural Ambitions

the pre-optimised blocks and clusters would be tested in site specific scenarios. The system at this level would be informed by primarily two aspects: the site context in terms of network patterns, density gradients and programmatic aspects; the other being the architectural ambitions, which would add a top-down approach to the system. Therefore the morphologies to adapt to each scenario would be constantly mitigated and modified through the process. The logic would be tested for its ability produce differentiated results in different sites by adopting a combination of bottom – up emergent method and top-down imposed ambition.

Comparative Studies

The process of design extensively engages in comparative studies at every design level to improve the system and highlight aspects that need to be considered at the succeeding level. This comparative method is applied even in the case study analysis part to better inform the system. To inform the design process two contrasting sites are identified Nan Chi Zi in Beijing, China and Ranwar Village in Mumbai, India as they provide differentiated situations in terms of environmental and socio-cultural factors, they hold spatial configurations that are unique, have the ability to encourage social interactions in their own way and are important for their respective cultural settings. Comparative study of these two distinct sites would help us derive an extensive and comprehensive view on the subject.

Further in the process, comparisons would be drawn

between the derived catalogued morphologies with morphologies of contemporary urban scenarios and indigenous settings. This would help us not only to shape the design ambitions but also provide us with insights into the limitations and possibilities within the system. Again, at the neighbourhood level, to test the applicability of the system, two contrasting urban scenarios are adopted. The results of which would be compared to check the appropriateness of the design method in each location. These would be further compared with existing urban scenarios to evaluate the output. The recursive comparison at every stage of design helps to critically review the results and adopt corrective methods in the following stages. It provides a perspective into the practicality and functionality of the as well as understand the emergent aspects of the design process.

38 39 Methods SynchroniCity 3.1 Proposed Design Methodology
Process Overview
MUMBAI SITE BEIJING SITE
Ranwar Village Mumbai
Nan Chi Zi Beijing Block Level Generation Cluster Level Generation
MUMBAI
BEIJING Indigenous
Settlements
Public Spaces
Frontyard
Open / Socially Relevant Spaces
Semi-public Spaces Hutong in Beijing Chowk in Mumbai Courtyard in Beijing
in Mumbai

Design Aspects

Aggregation & Dimension

Connectivity With Street

The research, analysis and design generation of the project is based around interdependency of morphology, environmental responses and socio-cultural aspects (Fig 3.2.1) The parameters therefore are selected based on keeping these factors in context. A number of projects have been made on the subject where interrelationship between climatology and built morphology are explored. Open spaces and their relationship to socio-cultural aspects are somewhat untouched as there are no direct tools to convert extracted information into applicable quantitative data informing a computational system.

The dissertation therefore attempts to relate factors such as privacy, views, connectivity, space definition and spatial organisation to socio-cultural aspects essential for an urban intervention. A

focus will be made on open spaces and how the built morphology shapes around them. In terms of environmental parameters, the analysis of the indigenous social spaces focuses on two aspects: public spaces and semi-public spaces. Both typologies are analysed and compared with each other to enable not only differentiation of the respective attributes, by means of parameters, but also implementation occurring at different levels of the design process. They are assessed to strengthen justification of their use in site. They are also evaluated with independent criteria that help us further in the definition of these spaces in the new urban context.

The following pages document how the various parameters and organisational aspects found within the indigenous settings will be studied and what part of the data will be extracted.

In a study of building aggregation around a space, it is crucial to understand how the semi-public and public spaces are formed at the local and cluster levels. This also will indicate the functional aspect of the space. At the local level, the semi-public space is integrated as part of the block typology formed by an aggregation of buildings (Fig 3.2.2) At the same time, dimensions that are most common in the two selected sample patches are extracted checked if the function of these spaces suit the urban context. This measurement of spatial quality will help in the generation process as an input rule, to follow the same logic observed in the indigenous settlement.

Spatial Hierarchy

Connectivity in the fabric is analysed following the idea that the street should be a part of the open space, as was the case in the past where streets were part of the social structure, allowing for travel, interaction and trade. This has changed dramatically in the current urban context where the streets are rationalised in a way so that they only allow transport. Scope for any informal activities along streets are limited. This also affects the relation between the defined network and open spaces, where a strong division exists between vehicular access and pedestrian access. The historical structure has a larger focus on open space acting as a core element; a factor not seen in the modern day urban design (Fig 3.2.5)

a. Historical

Spatial hierarchy is referred to as the rank or order of importance of various spaces [9] (Fig 3.2.3). This is an important part of our analysis as it primarily defines the order and organisation of various kinds of spaces. Hierarchy is based on two factors: visibility and accessibility. This is an essential consideration as it determines the desired functionality of the spaces. For the case studies the focus will be on analysis of the semi-public and public spaces. Learning from the Belapur housing project (Page 24) in new Mumbai and Asian game village in New Delhi (Page 28), it is important to understand how the spatial hierarchy would be determined and its affect on the quality of semi-public and public spaces.

Open spaces and the street should have a very similar quality, such that the street can essentially be part of the open space. By comparing two chosen settlements, we will investigate how the street’s used, as well as the street hierarchy and connectivity with the open space. Apart from quality, the open space should also be designed keeping in mind its interaction and transition to its surrounding network.

Programmatic Activity

To understand how semi-public and public spaces function, it is important to analyse their variant usage throughout the day. In the work of Jan Gehl ‘Life between buildings’ [3], the relationship between open space, quality and activity is explained. Fig 3.2.6 reflects how if the open space has a good quality, it directly influences how people use the space for optional activities. Different functions and activities will be assessed with its respective implementation within the day, in order to evaluate a critical time period. The spatial environment will be addressed based on this time factor to determine when the space needs optimisation of conditions such as shaded area proportion or incident solar radiation. Different activities in these spaces will also provide information on the kind of morphology that is desirable for that function.

Quality of the physical environment

[9] Spatial strategies: Hierarchy, Open Forum Available from: http://spatialstrategies.webs.com/ apps/blog show/244 81011-spatial-strategies-hierarchy]

[Accessed on 20 June 2013]

[10] Marshall, S., (2005) Street Patterns Streets p. 20, Spon Press, Abingdon Oxon [11] Gehl, J., (1987) Life between buildings, p.13, Island Press,Washigton DC

40 41 Methods SynchroniCity 3.2
Associative Techniques
Environmental Responses Morphology Of Built and Open Spaces Socio- Cultural Aspects E S M
3.2.1
Fig
structure
b. Modern structure
Private Covered semi-public Semi-public Public space
Fig 3.2.5 Historical and modern settlement structure [10] Fig 3.2.2 Semi-public space arrangement with two to four units Fig 3.2.3 Typical Street Hierarchies Fig 3.2.4 Semi-public and Public Spaces Fig 3.2.6 [11]

Morphology and Sizes

plays an important role in defining environmental conditions and will be used as one of the main factors. These parameters will be defined based on the case studies and will provide the technical information for site specific building orientation.

Definition of Patch Size

In the indigenous settlements the boundaries between different blocks or clusters are blurred and the demarcation between different communities are unrecognisable. To understand the dynamic nature of public spaces better, the fabric will be divided into smaller cluster level organisations according to proximity of these public spaces from residences.

Shaded Area Proportion

To fully analyse the functions occurring in the open spaces, we examine daily activity that may take place. Shaded area proportion to a large extent contributes to the quality of the space. A nonshaded area may be too uncomfortable to use in such hot climates and an overly shaded area may become too dingy for usage (due to poor lighting conditions). The right amount of shading at the right time of the day is essential for the space to perform efficiently.

3.2 Associative Techniques Parameters

Sky View Factor

Sky view factor is the amount of sky visible when viewed from the ground up (Fig 3.2.10) where generally a ‘fish-eye’ photograph is taken from the street level. It is measured in the range of 0 to 1, where a sky view factor of denotes a completely visible sky, and 0 denotes a sky blocked by obstacles. The higher the value, the quicker the urban canyon will cool, because more sky is available to absorb the heat retained by the buildings. With a low sky view factor, the canyon can retain more heat during the day, creating a higher heat release at night.

Building morphology will focus on how the built forms are organised with respect to the semi-public and public spaces (Fig 3.2.7) Different morphologies will be studied from case studies to analyse the relationship between aspects of quality and the built environment. Variations in these morphologies will be based on the existing environmental and socio-cultural factors in order to contextualise the project. Typical sizes of the spaces also will be part of the reference as they will define the functional and organisational attributes.

Shaded Area Proportion calculated

Defining Clusters

Building orientation is a fundamental factor that needs to be considered for environmental efficiency. In our design exercise we will use orientation to understand building position with respect to solar factors. Orientation of the built form will drive different responses based on the climatic conditions experienced.

As the case studies will be in different climatic zones, it will be important to understand the building orientation and its response to the environmental conditions. Surface area ratio

A computational tool will be developed to connect the entrances of the houses to the closest public space as shown in Fig 3.2.8 Proximity will be measured as the actual travel distance, not simply a the distance connecting two points. The output will provide us with information concerning the number of houses utilising the public space, the coverage distance and the longest travel distance experienced in order to access a public space.

Therefore, this parameter will be used as the percentage of area shaded at a particular time of the day (Fig 3.2.9). The 21st of June will be used as the date of analysis, as the position of the sun is at its highest during the year. If using this factor, the design is able to retain the same, or provide a better, shading solution from the analysis of the case studies, we can ensure that the rest of the year period will be maintained with good shading quality. Several sun positions will be taken from 12:00 to 14:00 hrs in the day, and the percentage of the building shadow cast on the open space will be calculated.

Viewing angle from centre of open space

SVF Visible Sky Area Projected Area

Sky view in the context of semi-public and public spaces is directly related to experiential and socio-cultural aspects. The built morphology around the multi-level open spaces will be directly governed by the sky view factor. Both connotations of the sky-view factor, environmental and experiential aspects, will be used for design considerations.

42 43 Methods SynchroniCity Typical Courtyard house Large Courtyard house
Orientation Closest Public Space for Buildings Public Space
Fig 3.2.7
North
Fig 3.2.8
South East East West West
Sun position
Shadow casting from blocks
Fig 3.2.9 Fig 3.2.10

Open Space Ratio

Open space ratio will provide the amount of open space required per household (Fig 3.2.11). For semi-public and public spaces to function, it is desirable that there is an active participation from users. Overcrowded or scarcely used spaces often don’t turn into interactive spaces; the right proportion of user participation is essential. To understand this aspect, two ratios will be calculated, semi-public space per built up area for the block level and public space per built up area for the cluster level. These ratios will be analysed from the vernacular settlements and their application in the proposed design evaluated.

Incident Solar Radiation

Enclosure Value Floor Area Ratio (FAR)

Semi-public Area Semi-public

At the block level, the modern urban development reduces the semi-public space to increase density. Therefore, in order to maintain the desired open space ratio, this parameter will also be applied in the generation process of the design logic.

Incident Solar Radiation analysis on Open Spaces and Pedestrian level. Average hour radiance value.

The semi-public and public spaces can only work if they are able to provide comfortable environmental factors. The capacity of these spaces to maintain or reduce temperature to a comfortable range is an important aspect to be considered. Therefore, apart from the shaded area proportion, incident solar radiation will be considered. Incident solar radiation, insulation, is measured as the energy received on surfaces during a selected time period. Calculation of this parameter will be based on hourly readings during the hottest periods from June to September. The solar radiation is converted to thermal energy, increasing the overall temperature of the open space. These values will be used for generation and transformation of semi-public and public spaces in design to match the qualities found in case studies.

South Facing Surface Ratio

South Facing Surface

South facing surface ratio

South facing surface area

Total surface area

This parameter is based on building orientation. The ratio can be calculated using the south facing surface area divided by the total surface area (Fig 3.2.14). Due to the sun path, south facing surfaces receives a higher concentration of sunlight throughout the year. This aspect will be used for a passive solar design. A higher number of south faces will mean higher sun exposure, and therefore higher solar gain [ideal situation for cold climates]. However, as the sites are located in hot climates, less south facing surfaces would be optimal in a passive design. The indigenous settlements will be studied with this aspect in mind.

Enclosure is defined as the ratio of enclosing surfaces to the space enclosed (Fig 3.2.12). In simpler terms, it is the ratio of surrounding surfaces to the semi-public or public space within.

This parameter defines the morphology of contextualised boundaries that is built around the open space. A higher enclosure value will mean a highly contained space disconnected from its neighbourhood, while a lower value of enclosure will denote a well connected or exposed space. This would imply that a higher value would indicate an intrinsic space and a lower value would indicate an extrinsic space. Different cultural settings would require different enclosure values for different kind of spaces. The enclosure is adopted as one of the parameters to describe the experiential aspects of the space.

Floor area ratio is one of the widely accepted methods of calculating the floor area density. It is the ratio of total built up area to the plot area (Fig 3.2.13) specifically, the amount of built up available per unit plot space. This aspect will be used for calculating the density, as population is directly proportional to the floor area available.

Different subsets of FAR would be used at different stage of the process. FAR at block level would be the ratio of Floor area accommodated in the plot, at cluster level it would be the ratio of total floor area in the cluster to the total area of the cluster and at the neighbourhood level it would indicate the ratio of total floor area in the site to the total area of the site.

44 45 Methods SynchroniCity
Area
Area
space ratio
Total Built Area Total Built
Semi-public
Fig 3.2.11 Fig 3.2.14
Enclosure Value FAR Facing Surface Area Semi-public Space Area Facing Surface Area Total built up area Semi-public Space Area Plot Area Plot Area Total Built up Area
Fig 3.2.12 Fig 3.2.13

Block Generation

Semi-public Space Building Units Genetic Algorithm

Cluster Generation Neighbourhood Generation

The proposed design will be approached in three stages: the block catalogue generation, and cluster catalogue generation and neighbourhood level design development. Different parameters are considered at different levels of development. The block level will deal with creating individual buildings incorporating multilevel semi-public spaces, and looking at the built open area relationship in detail. Buildings are generated such that there is a possibility to modify them at a later stage. This stage incorporates parameters independent of solar factors, so that their orientation can be modified at higher levels of the process. Iterations would be generated with evolutionary solver and after evaluating these morphologies, individuals will be selected to create a catalogue. The catalogue will contain individuals with differential qualities and density attributes.

The cluster level investigates aggregation of individual blocks to form a central public space, resembling the organisational features of indigenous settings. This stage aims at creating a well-connected community level aggregation with high spatial qualities. The stage looks at block – block relationships so as to not affect the

pre-optimised parameters of blocks. At the end of the process, the generation of a cluster catalogue will contain different cluster organisations to suit various urban requirements.

The neighbourhood level aims at testing the application of these catalogue morphologies in actual site conditions. The ability of these morphologies to create differentiation to suit site specific requirements is the key exploration. Aggregation of clusters and subsequent block differentiation to accommodate local aspects would be based on analysis of each site condition. Diversification will be added by modifying these individuals according to their situational location within the site. A feedback system will be implemented, one that informs the block individuals to further adapt to global organisation. These modifications will be achieved in response to interaction with neighbouring buildings, design ambitions, network criteria, increasing connectivity and improving quality of open spaces. The ambition would be to use the same system for different site conditions but obtain different results for each by changing parametric and generation criteria.

Distortion Free Aggregation Multi-software Data Transferring

Rectangle packing and Peripheral Packing is aggregation that involves packing polygon geometries in a defined space. These computational tools are used in the process to efficiently pack the plots together so as to reduce redundant spaces (Fig 3.3.1)

At the cluster and neighbourhood generation stage, these tools will define how the individual plots of different sizes are aggregated. The tools by default do not carry any additional information apart from the plot sizes; information will be added later based on the derived result. The logic employed in the system will be to pack the selected rectangles into the smallest possible space, with least number of pocket spaces and bounding area. This will provide twodimensional results that will vary depending on the start condition. As this is not an algorithm based process, multiple different iterations will be generated for a further evaluation process, where the best plot aggregation will be selected based on differentiated criterion.

During to design process, Grasshopper will be adopted as the main generative platform. However, analysis on spatial configuration or environmental performances need to be simulated using specific softwares.

This leads to the issue that during the genetic algorithm process, it is unable to provide a simultaneous feedback analysis to Rhino and Grasshopper, for the generation process to optimise.

Therefore it is crucial to create direct links between Rhino/ Grasshopper models and analytical tools such as Autodesk® Ecotect® or Depthmap. And only by this way we are able to transfer data between platforms in forms of iterative loops so that the spatial analyses are included not as a static evaluation but as a dynamic aspect of the design process.

46 47 Methods SynchroniCity 3.3 Generative Techniques
Ecotect/ Geco
Block
Adjacent Block Relation
Public Space
Aggregation
Cluster Aggregation Block Differentiation Genetic Algorithm Rectangle Packing Ecotect/ Geco Genetic Algorithm / Peripheral Packing / Geometry Reorganisation Ecotect/ Geco COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS
Density / Network Patterns
Grasshopper Autodesk® Ecotect® Grasshopper Autodesk® Ecotect® Geco® Fig 3.3.1 Cluster Footprint Aggregation Fig 3.3.2 Shadow Casting Analysis via Eco-Geco-Grasshopper link

Genetic Algorithm

The architectural design process is increasingly becoming more complex and precise. The need to simultaneously consider a number different parameters, analyse them and accordingly, generate optimised solutions, has brought Genetic Algorithm into architectural applications. Generative algorithms apply concepts of Emergence through the use of evolution and morphogenesis as a method of producing innovative forms. They provide further optimisation capabilities allowing for multi-parameter augmentation to derive a well-defined design solution.

The thesis will attempt to demonstrate incremental improvement of prescribed design performances through a computational process and emerging levels of complexity. The Genetic Algorithm greatly aids the simultaneous analysis-generation method to provide better building performances. The bottom up approach of urban design will be applied at two levels: block level to optimise

individual buildings and cluster level to optimise aggregation of these blocks.

Research detailing successful functioning of indigenous morphologies will attribute to a number of different parameters. To take these factors into account and simultaneously generate morphologies that are optimised across multi-parameters, we will use this algorithm where three kinds of data will feed into the system. These are: fixed data that will be kept as a constant throughout the generation process, variable data or genomes that can vary depending on situation, and Fitness Criteria which will evaluate the optimised form generations. The fitness criterion concerning enclosure value, sky view factor and solar shading will be used for qualitative analysis, while FAR will be used for density analysis. This process will generate a number of iterations where different inputs of variable data can provide different results.

Remapping Parameters Differential Weighting

The parameters employed in the system will possess different numeric domains. For comparison in analysis and scoring factors, they will need to be remapped into a standard domain of 0 to 1 (Fig 3.3.4)

Various techniques will be used for different kinds of remapping, as ranges of original numeric values are initially dissimilar. For certain parameters, the higher value does not necessary equate to a higher score. Therefore, all the parameters will be remapped such that numbers closer to 1 will mean a fitter score and numbers closer to 0 would reflect a lesser score. Threshold or toggle values will also be set using this method wherein if the numeric value doesn’t surpass a certain limit, it will be substantiated as a 0. This is an important step for the generation process as all the fitness criterion need to be able to be compared with each other in the same domain, to calculate a single numeric result.

Differential weighting will be used when the parameters cannot be computed by simple summation or averaging. It refers to weighting parameters differently based on their significance and priority to the process. Thus, the higher the priority, the more that parameter is weighted. This will be used as a method to optimise the result towards a desirable direction through differentiating primary aspects from secondary aspects, by way of weighting. For example, in a list of parameters, density is of the most significance as the desirable result has to accommodate higher density. Based on this preference factor, weighting on density parameter will be set as highest and amplified with a higher multiplicative factor (Fig 3.3.5). Differential weighting of fitness criterion works well with generative algorithms to generate different iterations of morphology. The weighting criterion provides the architect with control over the results generated in the design process.

48 49 Methods SynchroniCity
Original Domain Original Domain Original Domain Target Domain Target Domain Target Domain Amplify x 5 x x 5x 5x Amplify x 2 y y 2y 2y Amplify x Before Amplification After Amplification z z z z
min max min max 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 original domain target domain Mix Remap original domain target domain Condition Remap min max fittest value threshold value threshold value 0 1 0 1 original domain target domain Fittest Value Remap min max original domain target domain Linear Remap 0% 100% 87% 100% 0° 90° 60° 95% 60% none Criteria
Verandah
Criteria
Criteria
Area/ Plot Area Ratio Criteria 4: Proportion of Area Overlapped all min max min max 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 original domain target domain Mix Remap original domain target domain Condition Remap min max fittest value threshold value threshold value 0 1 0 1 original domain target domain Fittest Value Remap min max original domain target domain Linear Remap 0% 100% 87% 100% 0° 90° 60° 95% 60% none Criteria
Area/
Area
Criteria
of Area Overlapped all
Fig 3.3.4 Mathematical Principles of Remapping Strategies Fig 3.3.5 Selective Amplification of Values
1: number of
connected to front yard
3: Visibility Angle from front yard to street
2: Footprint
1: number of Verandah connected to front yard Criteria 3: Visibility Angle from front yard to street Criteria 2: Footprint
Plot
Ratio
4: Proportion
Fig 3.3.3 Pattern diversification in the Hawaiian Drosophila

ANALYSIS OF EXISTING INDIGENOUS SETTLEMENTS

The aim of this chapter is to understand the indigenous settlements with respect to various parameters. It will focus primarily on the inter relationship between the built morphologies and the social spaces that are created at the local and regional level. Over time, the indigenous settlements have evolved out of necessity. They have adapted to their local aspects and thus prove to be more sustainable environmentally and socioculturally. Studying these will provide understanding of the working of social spaces which would be utilised to design a system that incorporates these aspects. For this purpose, two patches with notable social spaces have been chosen to investigate their respective adaptation strategies.

4.1 Indigenous Settlements Overview and Design Logic

4.2 Indigenous Settlements : Parametric Study

4.3 Conclusion

50 51 Analysis SynchroniCity
54 67 81
4

INDIGENOUS SETTLEMENTS OVERVIEW AND DESIGN LOGIC 4.1

The information from the case studies will form the basic inputs for socio-cultural aspects of the design. The relationship between built and open spaces will be extracted from these case studies to be used in the urban design model. To make a comprehensive study we identify two sites for our study.

Nan Chi Zi in Beijing, China and Ranwar Village in Mumbai, India are selected as they provide contrasting situations in terms of environmental and socio-cultural factors. Both of these settlements are historic and are located in major cities, thus facing tremendous pressure of urbanisation. Both settlements hold rich and unique spatial characteristics that are exclusive to its respective indigenous settings, have the ability to encourage social interactions and are important for their culture. These spatial aspects will be lost if the current trend of urbanisation dominates the existing conditions. The new model of design would

try to accommodate these spatial attributes in higher density situations which can provide an alternative for development of such locations.

The primary reason driving the selection of these sites for study, is that in both settlements open spaces form an essential part of their social and cultural system and are well integrated in the built fabric. The relationship between built and open is such that informal interactions are accommodated at multiple levels. There is a defined hierarchy of spaces from absolute public to absolute private, which allows different kinds of activities to take place in these spaces. Therefore open spaces in these indigenous settings are better utilised as compared to modern urban scenarios. It is with this respect that public spaces and semi-public spaces, and their relationship with built form, will be studied. The motive of the design will be to use their spatial attributes informing the design of a higher density urban fabric.

52 53 Analysis SynchroniCity
Fig 4.0.1 Indigenous Settlements of Medellin

4.1 Indigenous Settlements : Overview and Design Logic Case Study

Patch Size: 350 x 300 m

Area: 0.11 km2

Population: 250 people / Ha

Number of buildings: 290

Building Height: 3- 7.5m

chrome-extension://alelhddbbhepgpmgidjdcjakblofbmce/edit.html

Ranwar Village, Mumbai

Ranwar Village is a small indigenous settlement located in the suburb of Bandra, isolated from the surrounding city of Mumbai (Fig 4.1.1). This settlement dates back to 1850’s and still retains dwellings that are about a hundred years old. It retained its social characters and a strong sense of community until the 1960s and 1970s. After which the pressure of urbanisation and the subsequent demographic demands started a slow decline in its spatial character. This village is known for its numerous pocket social spaces spread over the site called ‘chowks’ or squares. The settlement is composed of low-rise buildings with heights ranging from 3m to 9m. Each of these buildings has shared open semi-public space or front yards on the ground level. Entrances are typically through covered semi-public spaces or porches which are vertically stacked in cases of houses at higher floors. The distinct spatial flow from public spaces to private spaces brings about gradient levels of privacy and involvement with the surroundings.

The ever growing population and the increasing demand of living spaces lead to a dramatic 60% decrease in the number of traditional dwellings in the last decade, these traditional units have been replaced either by commercial or residential high rises. Over the years, the squares and the streets which act as public open spaces have remained the same but the semi-public spaces and primarily the private open spaces have been consumed to incorporate higher density. To study these spatial aspects of these socially relevant public and semi-public spaces in more detail and in order to understand the reason of their successful usage, this site is chosen to inform the design process.

Nan Chi Zi, Beijing

The origin of Beijing City planning dates back to 14th century and as it grew it followed the same pattern of radial growth from the centre to the outskirts. The present city has grown over a thousand times beyond the area of the old city. The site selected in Beijing is situated at the heart of the city that is on the east side of the inner city (Fig 4.1.4). As it is located between the traditional (Perking) and the modern infrastructure (commercial zone), the fabric encompassed by courtyard houses and hutongs or streets has changed dramatically. The traditional architecture is defined by courtyard houses; this area is also known for its social spaces which exist in the form of streets commonly known as ‘Hutong’. Typically, there would be two different types of Hutongs, where the secondary hutongs are pedestrian streets consisting of various household functions. These functions are an important factor not only for the neighbourhood to be self-sufficient but also as drivers of social life in the location. The height of buildings range from 4m to 20m. The fabric comprises a variety of building typologies within it.

The pressure of increasing density and modern development has forced the site to evolve and change in character in the past 20 years. Considering the presence of the traditional courtyard typologies in the prime location and the ever increasing demand for housing, nearly 50% of the traditional single story houses have been replaced by either commercial high rise or new housing typologies. This alteration has destructively disrupted the social spaces defined by traditional streets and housing typologies.

Patch Size :350 x 300m

Area: 0.11 km

Population: 400 people / Ha

Number of buildings: 470

Building Height: 4- 20m

chrome-extension://alelhddbbhepgpmgidjdcjakblofbmce/edit.html

54 55 Analysis SynchroniCity
Fig 4.1.1 Ranwar Village is situated in the suburb of Mumbai
Mumbai Case Study B Beijing
A
Fig 4.1.4 Nan Chi Zi area is situated in the centre of Beijing
300m 350m 300m 350m 0
0
100
100
14-2-7 添加注释
14-2-7 添加注释
1/1
Fig 4.1.2 Typical Residential Buildings in Ranwar Village Fig 4.1.3 Typical Residential Buildings in Nan Chi Zi

The semi-public spaces from two to four units form a few different block typology

To understand the semi-public spaces with respect to the morphologies, different characteristics and their relationship with surrounding built forms are further investigated. The semipublic spaces in Mumbai are usually formed by aggregating two to four units (Fig 4.1.11) while in Beijing minimum four units form the space (Fig 4.1.13). The semi-public spaces in Mumbai exist as partly covered to respond to environmental conditions. They are located within 1 -2 minutes’ walk from the closest public space and are offsets from the street. In Beijing, they are organised as intrinsic courtyards arranged linearly from the Hutong. The courtyard morphologies are designed to have passive ventilation to deal with extreme climate changes throughout the year. The average areas of open spaces in Beijing are almost 30 % larger than the ones in Mumbai. This means more area on the ground is covered with social spaces making the neighbourhood more connected. The extrinsic and intrinsic semi-public spaces have different social characteristics. As an experimental attempt, both types of morphology would be used to create variation in social spaces. Both the patches in Mumbai and Beijing have distinct semipublic and public space responding to their specific cultural and

environmental aspects. The characteristics of the morphologies are dependent on the different type of functions they serve. The courtyards in Beijing are used for household activities therefore visually segregated, whereas in India these building typology form spaces for casual interactions which they keep in moderate visual contact with the streets. The public spaces in Beijing exist in the form of hutongs that act as casual gathering spots (Fig 4.1.14) and in Mumbai they exist as chowk squares which can be used as mass gathering spots for festive occasions (Fig 4.1.12). These spaces are usually formed on the secondary roads. This shows the need for these places to keep easy accessibility, moderate visibility but still maintain some kind of seclusion from the main traffic. The morphologies from both studies would be used to build strategies for the design process.

56 57 Analysis SynchroniCity
Fig 4.1.11 Fig 4.1.12 Public space shares more connection to the street and form part of the pedestrian network
Semi
Spaces Semi
Morphology Derived Derived Morphology Morphology Morphology Public Spaces Public Spaces Hutong
Public
Public Spaces
is used as street network and public space
Average area of semi-public space Mumbai Beijing 50 m2 70 m Average area of public space Mumbai Beijing 251 m 300 m Fig 4.1.14
4.1.13 Public space Semi-public space Public
Semi-public
Open Space Configuration Mumbai Beijing
The semi-public spaces in Beijing exist as courtyard as parof the block typology
Fig
space
space
Fig 4.1.5 Chowk as Public Space Fig 4.1.7 Huntong as Public Space Fig 4.1.6 Porch as Semi - Public Space Fig 4.1.8 Courtyard as Semi Public Space
Derived Derived
Fig 4.1.9 Typical Section of Porch Fig 4.1.10 Typical Section of Courtyard

Morphology and Hierarchy

The selected patches in Mumbai and Beijing are approximately 0.11 km2 each which makes a self-sufficient residential neighbourhood. One of the distinct features of indigenous settlements is the space continuity as they express in transition from totally public to totally private. In both examples, the social spaces exist as distinct hierarchy of public and semi-public spaces. Therefore, for better understanding the spatial hierarchy factor was investigated at both the local and regional levels. The configuration of built form at both these levels plays a huge role in defining the hierarchy of spaces.

lead to the private areas (Fig 4.1.19, Fig 4.1.20). In both the cases the entrance to the private spaces is always from these shared semipublic spaces. The study of local and the regional levels shows that the transition of spaces from the private to the public areas i.e. the spatial hierarchy is always maintained.

Levels of spatial hierarchy

In Mumbai, the blocks with larger footprint area are always arranged around the public spaces and the smaller blocks are placed away from it (Fig 4.1.17). However, the porous tessellation of these smaller blocks forms a semi-public space that is shared by several households. In Beijing the Hutongs which perform as public spaces always open onto smaller secluded semi-public spaces which then Fig 4.1.17

The connection with these social spaces depends highly on the level of privacy. At the local level the tertiary streets are always connected to the semi-public spaces while the public spaces always exist on the secondary streets. These social spaces are always secluded from the primary network in order to achieve a certain amount of privacy. The different levels of hierarchy have indicated the change in visual privacy and accessibility. The organisation allows subtle transition from one level to another without major physical boundaries. The other aspect is the integration of tertiary streets as interaction spaces within the fabric. These are essential characteristics to consider in the design process.

58 59 Analysis SynchroniCity Public space Semi-public space Covered semi-public Private space Regional Type 1 Type 2 Type 3
Used by: Population: Area: Open vs built: Semi-Public / person: Single Family 6 57 m2 10% 0.8 m2 / person Private: Semi-Public: Built: Floors: 51 m2 5.2 m 51 m2 1 Used by: Population: Area: Open vs built: Semi-Public / person: 2 Families 10 126 m2 29% 5.4 m / person Private: Semi-Public: Built: Floors: 182 m2 54 m 94 m2 2 Used by: Population: Area: Open vs built: Semi-Public / person: 2 Families 10 200 m2 38% 10.4 m / person Private: Semi-Public: Built: Floors: 280 m2 104 m2 142 m 2
Fig 4.1.16 Used by: Population: Area: Open vs built: Semi-public / person: Single Family 8 570 m 37% 26 m2 / person Private: Semi-Public: Built: Floors: 260 m2 155 m2 415 m 1 Used by: Population: Area: Open vs built: Semi-public / person: Multiple families 40 1040 m 50% 9 m2 / person Private: Semi-Public: Built: Floors: 690 m2 350 m2 690 m2 1 Used by: Population: Area: Open vs built: Semi-public / person: Multiple Families 30 2600 m 63% 33 m2 / person Private: Semi-Public: Built: Floors: 3200 m2 1000 m 1600 m 2 Fig 4.1.18 Regional Public space Semi-public space Private space Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Levels of spatial hierarchy Fig 4.1.20
Spatial relation between semi-public and public space Fig 4.1.15
Mumbai Beijing
Spatial relation between semi-public and public space Fig 4.1.19

Network Patterns and Associated Programmes

There is a distinct hierarchy of streets visible in both the patches. In both the studies there is a differentiable change in character of streets from primary to tertiary. In Mumbai, the primary road serves the entire neighbourhood with the basic necessities. Markets and commercial shops are present along this road (Fig 4.1.21). In Beijing primary roads are peripheral and the household retail units are located on the secondary routes. In both the cases the tertiary streets are generally pedestrian and become part of the extended household. They are used as interaction spaces where there is proximity to small commercial / retail activity.

The distribution of the activities along these streets was studied to understand their functional relationship with social spaces. In Mumbai, the semi-public spaces are arranged in such a pattern that they are connected directly to either one or two streets depending

upon their location. The public spaces usually have 4 tertiary or secondary street connections making them well integrated and accessible. In Beijing, the semi-public spaces are always segregated to maintain privacy, while the hutongs are used as street network and public space. The secondary hutongs are pedestrian routes which then connect the semi-public spaces. These social spaces provide multifunctional usage in both the studies. The hutongs are generally associated with small commercial activities which can be used on daily basis while the chowks act as religious spaces.

Hierarchy of streets and their relationship with public and semipublic spaces is extracted from the case studies to inform the design process.

60 61 Analysis SynchroniCity Primary Road Secondary Road Tertiary Road Secondary Road Primary Road Tertiary Road Primary Road Wide Hutong Narrow Hutong
Fig
4.1.22
Busy primary road that accommodates markets, shops and other household necessities Fig 4.1.21 Network Hierarchies in Indigenous Settlements Fig 4.1.25 Network Hierarchies in Indigenous Settlements Fig 4.1.26 Local household retail shop set up on the secondary routes Fig 4.1.27 Informal interaction spot on the Tertiary Hutong Fig 4.1.28 Market set up on daily basis on Secondary Hutong Fig 4.1.23 Local Square located on Secondary route serves as religious or other mass gathering spot and doubles up as parking Fig 4.1.24 Small Local Square used as play area and spot for informal interactions
Road Secondary
Tertiary
Mumbai Beijing Primary
Road
Road

Building Orientation Defining Cluster Sizes

Distance to closes public space defines the cluster

Mumbai experiences an average annual temperature of 30oC, Beijing in contrast experiences extreme climate changes between summer and winter period. The buildings in Beijing have east- west orientation (Fig 4.1.30), so as to maximise the solar exposure during the winter. The courtyards houses also serve for passive ventilation which cools the building during the summer. According to the specific environmental response, around 70% of the buildings in India are aligned along north-south axis to minimise the solar exposure on the building, and 75 % of the buildings in Beijing are aligned along east-west axis to maximise the solar exposure respectively. This makes it clear that the settlements respond to the local climate in order to create a distinct morphological arrangement. To test and calculate the number of buildings oriented in this fashion, the length - width ratio was considered to calculate the number of building oriented in this fashion.(Fig 4.1.31). The criterion for this calculation was a ratio of length and width to be 1.2 and the buildings should lie in the range of -30 deg to +30 deg from the edge with respect to the axis.

At the regional level, the clusters are defined with respect to the use of public space. Distance from the buildings to a public space was drawn and the closest ones were chosen. This process is applied to all the buildings, where the fabric gets divided into different clusters depending on proximity to the closest public space (Fig 4.1.32). The public space will be studied in detail at the regional level with respect to the clusters. The aggregation logics extracted from this study can inform the design process.

In the preliminary studies, variation in density and the sizes of the clusters are observed in both the patches. The exercise shows that each public space in Mumbai had around four semi-public spaces surrounding it within 1-2 minute walk (Fig 4.1.34). While in Beijing, most of the semi-public spaces directly opened onto the public spaces (hutong). The clusters consistently cater to a diameter of 90-100 m which is about to 2 minutes walk (Fig 4.1.36).

62 63 Analysis SynchroniCity
Rule 1:
Least area of bounding box a a 30 30 1.2 b b
Rule 2:
Comparison of building orientation in Ranwar Village
East
West
70 % 25 % 75 % 30 %
Fig
4.1.31 North - South
-
Mumbai Beijing
Oriented along:
Fig 4.1.32
Mumbai Mumbai Beijing Beijing
Fig 4.1.29 Mumbai map showing the buildings (highlighted) having North South Orientation to minimise South Face Fig 4.1.34 Mumbai map showing the buildings (highlighted) having North - South Orientation to minimise South Face Fig 4.1.33 Example of Mumbai Cluster Fig 4.1.36 Mumbai map showing the buildings (highlighted) having North - South Orientation to minimise South Face Fig 4.1.35 Example of Beijing Cluster Fig 4.1.30 Beijing map showing the buildings (Highlighted) having East - West Orientation to maximise South Face

Analysis Design Logic

Extracted Logic

Analysis Design Logic

Extracted Logic

Morphology and Sizes (Building morphology)

Aggregation and Dimension (Semi-public and public space)

Extrinsic frontyard semi-public space Redial arrangement of blocks to form a public space

Proposed block typology includes both courtyard and frontyard of semi-public space

Size and morphology are important aspects for a space to work. An average size of 60 m2 (average of the size in Mumbai and Beijing) is considered for the design process. These semi-public space are generally shared by 3 to 4 families. For the Public spaces the size cannot be directly adopted from indigenous settlements as urban scale application would require larger areas. However, the proportion between the public space and the cluster size is taken into consideration.

Connectivity With Street

The semi-public and public spaces should be integrated with the streets to not only improve functionality but also add quality to the streetscapes.

Intrinsic courtyard semi-public space

Public space

Semi-public space

Covered semi-public space

Private space

Spatial Hierarchy

Transition from private to public space follows the spatial hierarchy logic.

The integration of semi-public spaces within the built fabric is one of the primary aspects of the design phase. This is essential to create a hierarchy of spaces in the proposed urban design similarly to the indigenous settlements. Semi-public spaces is introduced as a transitional space between the public and private areas.

Programmatic Activity

Conclusion

Comparing the two samples it was clear that there is a variation in density and sizes of clusters. The aggregation of blocks was a key part to be extracted from both case studies, which shows that each semi-public space is formed by two or more buildings to generate the courtyards and frontyards. It was also interesting to see how the semi-public spaces are spread on the ground in Beijing while they are stacked one above the other in Mumbai, in response to the local climate and activities.

Oriented along:

Different functions and activity take place in the same space at different times of the day. Therefore, spaces should be designed to accommodate variable activities.

Mumbai and Beijing show exactly opposite requirements for orientation. This aspect allows the same block to be used in both the sites just by changing the orientation.

At the same time, the relation between the semi-public and public space to the street were investigated and they are closely linked with the cultural activity that is happening in these spaces. Different types of activities not only shaped the social spaces around them, they are also closely linked with the specific environmental condition. Even though both samples have distinctly different characteristic of the semi-public spaces, the transition of spaces in terms of spatial hierarchy is

By analysing the blocks surrounding the public spaces, logic can be extracted to inform cluster sizes, proportions and aggregation of public spaces

always maintained. From this chapter, several design logic are looked into, to understand the different environmental and cultural factors with respect to the use of social spaces.

Following this study, the parameters will be further analysed to extract numerical data that can help to define the spatial qualities and design strategies which can be applied in evolutionary computational.

64 65 Analysis SynchroniCity
Beijing Beijing Beijing
Mumbai
Mumbai Mumbai
Public space Semi-public
Private space Public space Semi-public space Private space Average area of semi-public space Mumbai Beijing 50 m2 70 m Average area of public space Mumbai Beijing 251 m2 300 m Private: Semi-public: Population: Semi-public / person: 280 m 104 m 10 10.4 m / person 260 m2 155 m 8 26 m2 / person
space
Orientation
Cluster Size Radius 85 -95 M Radius 90 -100 M
Defining
Mumbai
North - South East - West Mumbai Beijing 70 % 25 % 75 % 30 %

4.2

INDIGENOUS SETTLEMENT PARAMETRIC STUDY

This part of the analysis chapter deals with extracting numeric parameters from the indigenous settings for application in the computational design process. The numeric data will be analysed and compared within the two case studies. The best identified aspects will be used in the design logic. The study will be presented in two levels, a block level that studies and investigates characteristics of semi-public spaces and a cluster level that explores the relationship between the built form and public spaces.

66 67 Analysis SynchroniCity

4.2 Indigenous Settlement : Parametric Study Local Analysis

Semi-public space are located on the ground and even distributed at higher levels

Semi-public space are located on the ground only

68 69 Analysis SynchroniCity Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5 Sample 6 Sample 7 Sample 8
Mumbai Sample Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5 Sample 6 Sample 7 Sample 8 Average Open Semi-public space area (m ) 55 57 135 28 92 64 53 92 103 Covered Semi-public space area (m ) 219 131 328 20 51 92 146 76 133 Patch area (m ) 708 722 1016 405 683 762 515 583 674 Total built area (m ) 543 356 894 124 241 712 419 153 430 Footprint (m ) 343 254 588 144 292 547 192 207 321 Number of floors to 3 1 to 3 to 3 to 3 1 to 3 Semi-public space
Mumbai
Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5 Sample 6 Sample 7 Sample 8 Beijing Beijing Sample Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5 Sample 6 Sample 7 Sample 8 Average Semi-public space area (m ) 185 104 81 56 110 45 150 96 103 Patch area (m2) 541 393 334 256 417 211 705 470 415 Total built area (m2) 712 289 253 200 297 166 555 274 343 Footprint (m2) 356 289 253 200 297 166 555 374 311 Number of floors 2 1 1 1 1 Semi-public space
Fig 4.2.1 Samples of Indigenous Settlements in Mumbai Fig 4.2.3 Table showing Statistics from Mumbai Samples Fig 4.2.4 Table showing Statistics from Beijing Samples Fig 4.2.2 Samples of Indigenous Settlements in Beijing

Shaded Area Proportion

Beijing

The analysis of shaded area proportion on the semi-public spaces shows that, even at the hottest period of the day, (12:00 to 14:00 hrs), at least 23% to 25% of the area remains shaded (Fig 4.2.5). This information also reveals that completely shaded, dark spaces do not convert into interaction spaces. The appropriate balance of shaded and exposed area contributes to creating good environmental condition. The numeric data would be used as guideline for the design process as to how much minimum value is expected. This factor would be essential to create a comfortable condition for summer period so that these spaces can be converted into interaction spots.

Incident Solar Radiation

Incident solar radiation is a part of environmental aspect, and it is closely linked to shaded area proportion but not completely dependent on it. These values are extracted during the summer months in both sites. In Mumbai, the average value is approximately 380 Wh/m (Fig 4.2.6), a reduction from the city average of 518wh/m2 A similar result is seen in Beijing where the average radiation received is approximately 276 Wh/m when the city averaged around 400 Wh/m2 The target value of incident solar radiation should be site specific and similar to the case studies for the design process.

Sky View Factor

The sky view factor for semi-public spaces goes up to 0.7 in Ranwar Village whereas this ratio is consistently maintained at around 0.5 in Nan Chi Zi (Fig 4.2.7). Although Mumbai has better sky view factor value than Beijing, they are relatively higher than any urban scenario. This means that a significant part of the interaction spaces are opened with buildings of only to 3 floors around them. Maintaining this sky view factor in the design process could provide an essential aspect of quality both environmentally and experientially.

Enclosure Value

The study reveals that spaces in Nan Chi Zi have a higher value of enclosure. This means that the spaces here are more closely bound by surrounding surfaces as compared to Ranwar village. It also describes the degree of privacy expected. From the values it can be observed that the spaces in Beijing are more intrinsic and spaces in Mumbai are more extrinsic (Fig 4.2.8) The range of enclosure values would be used to inform the system. This would help to design culture specific spaces and therefore have higher appropriateness to the context.

70 71 Analysis SynchroniCity S1 (55 m S2 (57 m S3 (135m2 S4 (28 m S5 (92 m2 S6 (64 m S7 (53 m ) S8 (58 m Average percentage 23% 27% 7% 25% 25% 27% 36% 29% 25% Time 21st.June Average percentage covered from 12:00-14:00 S1 (185 m S2 (104 m S3 (81 m S4 (56 m ) S5 (110 m S6 (45 m S7 (150 m ) S8 (96 m ) Average percentage 33% 33% 13% 23% 17% 24% 16% 24% 23% Mumbai Beijing 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Mumbai Mumbai Beijing
Average hourly value from May- Sept on semi-public space Average hourly value from May- Sept on semi-public space Mumbai Beijing S1 (55 m ) S2 (57 m S3 (135m ) S4 (28 m S5 (92 m ) S6 (64 m S7 (53 m S8 (58 m ) Average percentage 357 263 411 384 420 347 310 459 378 Time May-Sept Incident Solar Radiation Wh/m ) S1 (185 m S2 (104 m ) S3 (81 m S4 (56 m S5 (110 m ) S6 (45 m ) S7 (150 m ) S8 (96 m ) Average percentage 207 292 311 275 320 245 295 216 276 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0
Fig 4.2.5 Average percentage covered vs. samples Fig 4.2.6 Incident Solar Radiation ( Wh/m ) vs. samples 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Time 21st.June Sky view factor for semi-public space S1 (55 m S2 (57 m ) S3 (135m S4 (28 m ) S5 (92 m S6 (64 m ) S7 (53 m S8 (58 m Average percentage 0.63 0.53 0.74 0.49 0.68 0.52 0.62 0.57 0.60 S1 (185 m ) S2 (104 m S3 (81 m ) S4 (56 m ) S5 (110 m S6 (45 m S7 (150 m S8 (96 m Average percentage 0.41 0.50 0.78 0.34 0.53 0.48 0.37 0.46 0.50 Fig
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mumbai Beijing 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0 Mumbai Beijing S1 (185 m ) S2 (104 m S3 (81 m ) S4 (56 m S5 (110 m S6 (45 m S7 (150 m S8 (96 m Average percentage 544 279 254 165 283 122 324 238 276 2.94 2.82 3.14 2.94 2.57 2.71 2.16 2.48 2.70 S1 (55 m ) S2 (57 m S3 (135m S4 (28 m S5 (92 m S6 (64 m2 S7 (53 m S8 (58 m ) Average percentage 74 115 81 51 90 98 68 107 85 1.37 2.00 0.60 1.82 0.98 1.53 1.28 1.16 1.34 Building facade (m2 Enclosure value Mumbai Beijing 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0 Fig 4.2.8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mumbai Beijing
4.2.7 Sky view factor vs. samples Enclosure Value vs. samples

Open Space Ratio

The aspect about semi-public space per person essentially defines the quality of living. In both the indigenous settings, the amount of semi-public space is considerably high compared to modern urban models. This range would be the target value considered to be achieved for our design proposal. These kinds of spaces encompass essential socio-cultural values, by means of activities that take place in them. The semi-public spaces are about 25% of built up area in Ranwar Village and 23% in Nan Chi Zi (Fig 4.2.9) These high ratios are attributed due to the functions they serve. These spaces are a part of the household and a large number of daily activities take place in them.

South Facing Surface to Volume Ratio

Building orientation remains one of the low cost approaches to improve environmental performance of buildings. The analysis has shown that most of the buildings in Mumbai are oriented north–south with longer edges of the building facing east – west (Fig 4.2.10) This considerably reduces the south face and there by reducing solar gains. An important aspect to be considered while designing for hot climates. Even in courtyard typologies in China most of the important rooms are located on the north with longer edges facing the south. This increases the solar gain on the building. This aspect is important in cold climate of Beijing; however this effect is redundant when the temperatures go up to 400 in summer.

Analysis (Regional) Parameters Extracted Data

25% 23%

Time: May-Sept Mumbai Beijing

A minimum of 20% - 25% of the semi-public space needs to be shaded for at least 2 hours during the afternoon (12:00 hr to 14:00 hr ) every day. Depending on the location, the values for solar incident radiation on the semi-public spaces have to be compared to the values seen in the indigenous settlements. This aspect would be essential to create a comfortable environment.

Mumbai Beijing

Sky view factor for semipublic space 0.60 0.50

A minimum of 0.5 sky view factor threshold has been set for the design as seen from the indigenous settlements. The criteria would be set as higher the sky view better the quality.

Mumbai Beijing

Enclosure Value 1.34 2.70

Mumbai Beijing

Semi-public space /total build up area 25% 23%

Enclosure values were distinct for each site. Therefore, to design in a similar environmental condition as Mumbai, the enclosure should be in range of 1.1 - 1.5 and to design in Beijing the enclosure value should be 2.5 - 2.9. The indigenous settlement shows a high percentage of this ratio. For the urban context and the multilevel integration of semi-public spaces, the built to semi-public space ratio would be considered at 10% minimum.

Mumbai Beijing

South facing surface to total surface area 0.15 0.23

With response to the local climate the samples in Mumbai reduce the surfaces facing south while in Beijing they try to maximise the same.

72 73 Analysis SynchroniCity Built Area Covered Semi-public Area Open Semi-public Area Mumbai Beijing 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% S1 (55 m ) S2 (57 m S3 (135m ) S4 (28 m S5 (92 m ) S6 (64 m S7 (53 m S8 (58 m2 Average percentage 26% 22% 22% 18% 31% 23% 29% 32% 25% Semi-public space to total build up area ratio S1 (185 m ) S2 (104 m S3 (81 m ) S4 (56 m ) S5 (110 m S6 (45 m S7 (150 m S8 (96 m Average percentage 18% 28% 24% 20% 29% 19% 19% 27% 23%
Fig 4.2.9 Semi-public space ratio vs. samples 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mumbai
Beijing
Mumbai Beijing S1 (185 m S2 (104 m ) S3 (81 m S4 (56 m ) S5 (110 m ) S6 (45 m ) S7 (150 m ) S8 (96 m ) Average percentage 415 237 294 327 241 256 184 174 266 2235 1264 1410 1721 1004 826 681 725 1233 0.18 0.19 0.21 0.19 0.24 0.30 0.27 0.24 0.23 S1 (55 m ) S2 (57 m S3 (135m ) S4 (28 m S5 (92 m ) S6 (64 m S7 (53 m S8 (58 m ) Average percentage 196 210 208 90 84 109 145 214 161 1504 1152 2008 643 442 641 690 1338 1052 0.13 0.18 0.10 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.18 0.14 0.15 South facing surface (m ) Total surface (m )
surface to total surface area
South facing
0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0 Fig 4.2.10 South facing surface ratio vs. samples 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mumbai Beijing
Incident Solar Radiation Shaded Area Proportion Enclosure Value Open Space Ratio South Facing Surface to Total Surface Area Ratio Sky View Factor
Summary Sheet
Incident
Solar Radiation ( Wh/m2 378 276
Average percentage covered from 12:00-14:00
Time: 21st.June Mumbai Beijing

4.2 Indigenous Settlement : Parametric Study Regional Analysis Mumbai

74 75 Analysis SynchroniCity
Mumbai Sample Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5 Sample 6 Average Public space area (m ) 269 250 489 270 236 264 296 Patch area (m2) 6392 5685 7400 6731 5946 6248 6400 Total built area (m2) 3900 5990 4111 4124 4862 4359 4558 Footprint (m ) 3004 3578 2590 2487 2305 2610 2762 Number of floors to 3 to 3 1 to 3 1 to 3 to 3 1 to 3 Public space
Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5 Sample 6
Sample
Sample
Beijing Sample Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5 Sample 6 Average Public space area (m ) 386 278 977 279 250 237 401 Patch area (m2) 4310 3048 6894 3091 3701 2598 4253 Total built area (m2) 2950 2394 4809 2812 3451 3361 3296 Footprint (m ) 2950 2394 4809 2812 3451 3361 3296 Number of floors 1 1 1 1 1 Public space
Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3
Sample 4
5
6 Fig 4.2.11 Samples of Indigenous Settlements in Mumbai Fig 4.2.12 Samples of Indigenous Settlements in Beijing Fig 4.2.13 Table showing Statistics from Mumbai Samples Fig 4.2.14 Table showing Statistics from Beijing Samples
Beijing

The shaded area proportion is analysed for both type of public spaces. It was observed that during the course of the day, in Mumbai the minimum shaded area is 18% and that of Beijing is 13% (Fig 4.2.15). These values are affected by the different configurations they hold at each location.

Sky View Factor Mumbai Beijing

The values of sky view factor at public level is very similar to those of semi-public spaces. They show similar trend of higher sky view of 0.7 in Mumbai as compared to 0.56 in Beijing (Fig 4.2.17) This is because the public spaces in Mumbai are generally surrounded by buildings of 2 to 3 floors as opposed to Beijing, where the buildings are single floored. Logics for design is similar to semi-public spaces, higher the sky view better is the quality but the threshold is 0.5.

Enclosure Value Mumbai Beijing

The values for incident solar radiation on public spaces are similar to the ones seen at the level of semi-public spaces.

As mentioned in the earlier analysis, the morphology is able to mediate the solar radiation values to keep them in similar range. This proves that, to create comfortable environment this range needs to be followed for the design stage. The range is different in both the samples, firstly due to the environmental factors which are site specific (Fig 4.2.16) and also due to the organisational aspects which are governed by the activity it is used for.

Hutongs and Chowks present different morphologies for public spaces. Enclosure is a parameter to calculate the bounding surfaces of the space. The results of the analysis cannot be compared realistically as Hutongs are narrow streets and Chowks are squares (Fig 4.2.18) However, both the features are relevant for social life and can be applied to a single design without affecting each other. Therefore, the social spaces in the form of Hutongs and Chowks could be adopted for the design, with the requirement of the respective enclosure for the site.

76 77 Analysis SynchroniCity Radiance Wh / m 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Average hourly value from May- Sept on public space Average hourly value from May- Sept on public space S1 (269 m ) S2 (250 m ) S3 (489 m S4 (270 m S5 (236 m S6 (264 m Average percentage 378 349 403 384 420 347 380 Time May-Sept Incident Solar Radiation ( Wh/m ) S1 (386 m S2 (278 m S3 (386 m S4 (279 m S5 (250 m ) S6 (237 m Average percentage 301 276 346 275 320 245 293 Mumbai Mumbai Beijing Beijing 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 20% 15% 10% 5% 0
summer.
50 % of the Public space area in Mumbai are shaded for 4 hours daily during
70 % of the Public space area in Beijing are shaded for 6 hours daily during summer.
S1 (269 m ) S2 (250 m ) S3 (489 m S4 (270 m2 S5 (236 m ) S6 (264 m ) Average percentage 20% 24% 10% 15% 18% 21% 18% Time 21st.June Average percentage covered from 12:0014:00 on 21st June S1 (386 m S2 (278 m S3 (386 m S4 (279 m S5 (250 m ) S6 (237 m Average percentage 12% 13% 15% 10% 16% 11% 13%
Mumbai
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fig 4.2.16 Incident Solar Radiation ( Wh/m ) vs. samples Fig 4.2.15 Average percentage covered vs. samples
Shaded Area Proportion Incident Solar Radiation
Mumbai Beijing Beijing
S1 (269 m S2 (250 m S3 (489 m S4 (270 m ) S5 (236 m S6 (264 m Average percentage 0.64 0.63 0.82 0.67 0.72 0.79 0.71 Time 21st.June Sky view factor for semi-public space S1 (386 m S2 (278 m ) S3 (386 m ) S4 (279 m2 S5 (250 m S6 (237 m Average percentage 0.73 0.48 0.52 0.50 0.54 0.57 0.56 Mumbai Beijing 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fig 4.2.17 Sky view factor vs. samples Mumbai Beijing 250 200 150 100 50 0 S1 (269 m S2 (250 m S3 (489 m S4 (270 m ) S5 (236 m S6 (264 m Average percentage 130 86 128 142 98 88 112 Enclosure Value S1 (386 m S2 (278 m ) S3 (386 m ) S4 (279 m2 S5 (250 m S6 (237 m Average percentage 231 150 194 167 186 218 191
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fig 4.2.18 Enclosure value vs. samples

The open space ratio calculates the amount of public space per built up area. The range of the public space varies between 7 to 12 % with the odd one going up to 20% (Fig 4.2.11). The ratio shows the amount of population a public space should support. A space too small would always be crowded and thereby reduce quality. An excessively large space would not be intimate enough to generate user participation and interaction. The public spaces are seen to support a number of activities apart from casual gatherings like small commercial activities and workshops, these aspects would have to be accommodated to make the space active. The study has given a good judgement of the amount of area required to generate such spaces.

Semi-Public & Public Space Percentages

The indigenous settings are completely distinct from each other in terms of their environmental and sociocultural aspects. At the same time they show numerous similarities in their organisation and arrangement of their social spaces. The distinct character of the semi-public and public spaces provide different levels of social activities. The interesting fact being that, although they are two completely different locations, the area dedicated for their public and semi-public spaces are very similar (Fig 4.2.12). The differences being that semi public spaces exist only on the ground in Beijing, whereas in Mumbai they are evenly distributed at higher levels as well.

Analysis (Regional) Parameters Extracted Data

Time: 21st.June Mumbai Beijing

percentage covered from 12:00-14:00 18% 13%

A minimum of 15-20% of the public space needs to be shaded for at least 2 hours during the afternoon (12:00 hr to 14:00 hr ) every day.

Time: May-Sept Mumbai Beijing

Solar Radiation Wh/m ) 380 293

Depending on the location, the values for solar incident radiation on the public spaces have to be compared to the values seen in the indigenous settlements. This aspect would be essential to create a comfortable environment.

build up area 7% 12%

A minimum of 0.5 (50%) sky view threshold has been set for the design as seen from the indigenous settings. The criteria would be set as higher the sky view better the quality.

Morphologies are completely distinct for each site. Enclosure values can be used to design the tertiary streets and public spaces with respect to the specific location.

For the urban context the public space would be set at approximately 10% of the built area.

The percentage of semi-public and public space serve as reference for the design. The attempts would be to achieve these numbers, however this would be extremely difficult as in the urban situation due to the need to accommodate the density the open spaces may get sacrificed to some extent.

78 79 Analysis SynchroniCity S1 (386 m S2 (278 m S3 (386 m S4 (279 m S5 (250 m ) S6 (237 m Average percentage 13% 12% 20% 10% 9% 7% 12% S1 (269 m ) S2 (250 m ) S3 (489 m S4 (270 m2 S5 (236 m ) S6 (264 m ) Average percentage 7% 4% 12% 7% 5% 6% 7% Public space /Total build up area Mumbai Beijing 20% 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0 Mumbai Beijing Density Semi-public Public Beijing Mumbai 250 ppl/ha 18% 9% 400 ppl/ha 18% 8%
Built Area Covered Semi-public Area Open Semi-public Area Open
Space Percentage
Fig 4.2.19 Public space ratio vs. samples Mumbai
2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 Semi-Public & Public Space Percentages
Beijing
Incident Solar Radiation Shaded Area Proportion Enclosure Value Open Space Ratio Sky View Factor
Average
Incident
Mumbai
Sky view factor for semipublic space
Mumbai
Enclosure
Mumbai
space /Total
Density Semi-public Public Beijing Mumbai 250 ppl/ha 18% 9% 400 ppl/ha 18% 8%
Beijing
0.71 0.56
Beijing
Value 112 191
Beijing Public
Summary Sheet
Fig 4.2.20 Semi-public Spaces and Public Spaces Comparison

4.3 Conclusion

The study of the semi-public and public spaces in the two different locations helped derive the parameters to be used in the design logic. It also streamlined the use of parameters of semi-public spaces at block level and public spaces at cluster level.

Three kinds of parametric data were derived from the study: First kind of data was common in both case studies like the percentage of public and semi-public space. The second kind was completely distinct but can be applied to two different aspects of design without affecting each other and thereby improving quality of both. For example, features of Hutongs can be applied to tertiary level streets

and features of Chowk can be applied to central or common open spaces. The third kind was related to the environmental aspects and was completely site specific, therefore can be applied only when the site was chosen.

A few of the parameters which were extracted from the case studies could not be used for the generative process directly. To simplify this information, a few experiments will be conducted to derive morphological implications that can be used for the block generation process. These aspect will be discussed in detail in the following chapter.

80 81 Analysis SynchroniCity

5 BLOCK CATALOGUE GENERATION

This chapter focusses on the building block level of design and explores the possibilities of integrating high quality semi-public spaces at multiple levels within the built form. The chapter illustrates the development of a design logic for the blocks which is informed by a number of different experiments and studies. The goal is to create a system that would yield differentiated blocks by varying parametric weightage of criteria. A catalogue of fit individuals would be created that show variation in terms of quality and density.

5.1 Design Inputs

5.2 Experiments

5.3 Block Generation

5.4 Block Level Catalogue

5.5 Conclusion

82 83 Block Catalogue Generation SynchroniCity
84 86
96 99
89

Semi-public Space Size

Floor Overhang

For the design process, certain preliminary data was required in terms of sizes of semi-public spaces and the sizes of plots. The sizes of semi-public spaces have been adopted from the case studies which shows an average of 50 m2 (Fig 5.1.1) The initial dimension is taken as 8m x 8m which can be modified during the design process. According to this, to start with each semi-public would be 64 m , this will be used as an input for the design logic to be applied on different floors within the block.

It was observed that as the block grows higher, the build-able area available on the subsequent floors reduces drastically. As a counter measure overhang logic would be used where the building is allowed to project over the empty space within the plot by 2m to 4m. The primary result of this logic is that it creates additional buildable area and thereby increases the capacity of the building to accommodate higher built up area. It also creates shaded spaces, which could serve a number of different informal functions like small markets, sit outs spaces etc., this would add spatial variation in the streetscape.

Plot Size

Floor Offset Logic Experiment 1

Experiment 2

Semi-public Space Proximity

To induce certain shade pocket spaces along the network, the footprint area would be allowed certain flexibilities. The footprint in the medium and large plots would be in the range of 60% to 90%. This with the overhang logic would be used to create canopied spaces which eventually would become part of the pedestrian network during the aggregation stage.

The plot areas are defined depending on the number of semi-public spaces and the proportional built up area that can be supported. The plot sizes are generated considering 1, 2 and 3 semi-public spaces and the plot area required to support the corresponding built up area. Plot sizes of 24m x 24 m, 32 m x 32 m and 40 m x 40m will be used in the design process.

The aim of the experiment was to develop a relationship between the built morphology and sky view factor parameter. The idea was to create a simple geometrical rule that informs the system such that, the minimum quality remains preserved while increasing the density of the block. The simple strategy of offsetting the built form on a higher level was investigated and the subsequent change in sky view factor was noted. Iterations with offset logic were able to create many more options for the surrounding built morphology. A direct relationship between quality and the amount of offset was observed. A range of offset (2m - 4m) was required per floor to maintain the same spatial quality. This would bring some diversity on the created morphologies and have a drastic impact on density (Fig 5.2.1, Fig 5.2.2).To maintain minimum quality while having a high density, the range of offset was adopted between 2m to 4m on the succeeding floor.

As the building ascends, the semi-public spaces on higher floors cause the buildable area to reduce. This occurs primarily due to the Floor Offset logic implemented in the previous experiment. Therefore, it was important to investigate and experiment with the location of semi-public spaces at upper levels. The aim of the experiment is to develop a logic that could decide the location of the subsequent semi-public space in order to increase the density of the block. Three different conditions were experimented: at the nearest possible point, at the furthest possible point and at a randomly selected point. The results showed that the block was able to generate higher built up area when the semi-public spaces were located at the closest point on the subsequent floor. However, this would create a specific terraced building typology. Therefore, in order to have variation in blocks, other conditions were also allowed but with lower weightage.

Logic: Most of the semi-public spaces at higher levels would be located near the closest available positions.

84 85 Block Catalogue Generation SynchroniCity 5.1 Design Inputs 5.2 Experiments Design Logic Aggregation and Dimension Extracted From Case Studies Indigenous Settlement Semi-public Space Size Plot Size Design Input
20 32 40
space Mumbai Beijing 50 m 70 m2 Large Plot Medium Plot Small Plot
Average area of semi-public
Fig 5.1.1 Semi-public sizes adopted from indigenous settlements Fig 5.1.2 Three different footprint sizes Fig 5.2.1 The upper block is placed exactly over the lower block
2-4 M 2-4 M
Fig 5.2.2 The upper block was offset by 2-4m from the lower block
SVF 0.36 SVF 0.69
Examples from the iterations showing the difference in SVF Examples of from space proximity experiment
With Street Extracted From Case Studies Indigenous Settlement Floor Overhang Design Input Urban Infrastructure Block Footprint Block Footprint
Connectivity
Footprint
FAR 1.35 EV 1.17 SVF 0.63 FAR 0.91 EV 1.38 SVF 0.54 FAR 0.87 EV 1.75 SVF 0.52 Closest Point Furthest Point Random Point Experiment Experiment 2 Floor Offset Logic Semi-public Space Proximity Floor Offset Logic Semi-public Space Location Sky view Factor Experiments Design Input Extracted From Case Studies Indigenous Settlement
Logic: The range of floor offset from semi-public space would be between 2m to 4m on the succeeding floor.

Experiment 3

Semi-public Space Distribution

The experiment is to find the most efficient distribution of semipublic spaces in the building in terms of number, location and arrangement. The logic tries to achieve the highest density in each size of plot. Once the semi-public space gets located, it generates the proportional built up area around it. The iterations of different morphologies are checked for both the sky view factor and enclosure as quality criteria and FAR as density criteria. The first set of experiments are tested with fixed number of semipublic spaces per floor with 1,2 and 3 starting points. The second set of experiments are tested with variable number of semi-public spaces per floor (Fig 5.2.3). These tests are carried out on different plot sizes with all possible options of starting points. They are

programmed to generate the best possible densities.

The results show that when two semi-public spaces are placed at the ground level for the large plot, a much higher density could be achieved. This would be the same with the medium plot when only one semi-public space is used as a starting point. These results have also contribute to the design logic where the footprint could be varied between 70% - 100%.

Logic To generate a higher block density, variable number of semi-public spaces per floor would be allowed.

Experiment 4

Connectivity Logic

Connectivity logic defines how the various semi-public spaces would be interconnected within the block. This aspect was derived from the case studies where the semi-public spaces are part of the network and are located at the entrances of the houses. This aspect would be adopted in the design of the block.

The logic of connection is based on the location and proximity of semi-public spaces from each other as well as the ground level. Two semi-public spaces could be connected if the distance between the centroids is in the range of 12m (Fig 5.2.4). If they are on the same face within the range of 20m they get connected by a ramp or a staircase externally (Fig 5.2.5). These connections need to form

the shortest route that connects the top most semi-public space to ground.

In accordance with this logic, a fitness criterion is derived where the connection from the top most semi-public space to the ground level has to be the shortest possible length i.e. below 60m (Fig 5.2.7). This number is based on 1 or 2 minute walking distance. This ensures that the circulation length is optimized and the spaces are well connected and easily accessible.

86 87 Block Catalogue Generation SynchroniCity
1 2 3 4 FAR : 2.11 SVF 0.84 FAR 1.67 SVF 0.86 FAR : 1.17 SVF : 0.85 FAR 2.3 SVF 0.81 FAR : 1.86 SVF : 0.72 FAR 2.08 SVF 0.81 FAR 1.65 SVF 0.83 FAR 2.07 SVF 0.70 32 40
Experiment 5 Connectivity Logic Experiments Design Input Connectivity Logic 12 m CL : 73 m Before Optimising Before Optimising After Optimising After Optimising CL : 44 m CL : 77 m CL : 58 m
1
Semi-public
Fig 5.2.3 Flexible Number Of Semi-public Space/ Floor
Rule
: Connecting
Spaces
Fig 5.2.6 Blocks with Longest Circulation Length > 60m Fig 5.2.4 Linking Adjacent Semi-public Spaces Fig 5.2.5 Linking Semi-public Spaces Close to Boundary Fig 5.2.7 Blocks with Longest Circulation Length < 60m
Experiment 3 Semi-public Space Distribution Semi-public Space Distribution Sky view Factor Experiments Design Input Extracted From Case Studies Indigenous Settlement
Experiments
5.2

5.3 Block Generation Logic

Indigenous Settlement

Three different sizes of plots would be the base area for the block generation.

Multiple fitness criteria are used to generate the block. It would be necessary to test the fitness criteria with differential weighting in order to achieve optimum result.

Based on the fitness criteria of quality and density and different weighting strategies, three different typologies would generated. 8 fittest individuals will be selected from the GA generation for evaluation.

The sky view factor evaluation will eliminate any block with SVF value below 0.5.

This evaluation criteria takes into account modifications to blocks at higher design levels, criteria are therefore based on this aspect.

At the end of generation process, there would be 4 fittest individuals selected for each plot size

The block catalogue would constitute 36 fittest individuals with variable density and quality.

Block Generation Logic

The generation process draws inputs from three sources: the urban infrastructure, the case studies and experiments. Information like plot sizes, offset logic, semi-public space distribution are fed into an evolutionary solver as inputs to generate the possible options of morphologies. These morphologies will be optimised by the selected quality and density factors. The aspects that are difficult to compute computationally are set as evaluation criteria. The aim will be to create a catalogue of three different typologies of blocks with different weighting on quality and density factors.

88 89 Block Catalogue Generation SynchroniCity Design Logic Design Logic Parameters Parameters Aggregation and Dimension Connectivity With Street Sky View Factor Orientation South Facing Surface Ratio Open Space Ratio Enclosure Value Extracted From Case Studies
Parameters Sky view Factor Sky view Factor Density Requirement South Facing Surface Ratio Open Space Ratio Enclosure Value Floor Overhang Semi-public Space Size Experiment 1 Experiment 2 Experiment 3 Floor Offset Logic Floor Offset Logic Semi-public Space Proximity Semi-public Space Location Semi-public Space Distribution Semi-public Space Distribution Experiment 5 Connectivity Logic Connectivity Logic Plot Size Architectural aspects SVF value > 0.5 Experiments Design Input Fitness Criteria Evaluation Quality Q Density D 64 m
Block Level Density Requirement Urban Infrastructure Block Footprint Sky View Factor Architectural aspects 40 x 40 m 1600 m 32 x 32 m 1024 m 24 x 24 m 576 m Design Input Fitness Criteria Evaluation 1 Evaluation 2 Block Generation Catalogue Plot Aggregation Cluster Generation Typology 2 8 Blocks Plot Size Plot Size Large Large Small Small Medium Medium Typology 2 4 Blocks Typology 2 4 4 4 Typology 3 8 Blocks Typology 3 4 Blocks Typology 3 4 4 4 Typology 1 8 Blocks Typology 1 4 Blocks Typology 4 4 4 20% 50% 80% 80% 50% 20% Q Q Q Q D D D D Quality Density
Genetic Algorithm Block Generation

5.3 Block Generation

Fitness Criteria

Remapping Parameters

Parameters addressed are either density or dwelling qualities, where they are remapped into identical [0, 1] domain (Fig 5.3.1). Differentiated strategies are used to remap, the lower limit was always considered as the minimum score while the upper limit maximum. By introducing the remap strategy, various criteria could be compared with differentiated magnitudes and units via a numeric value illustrating discrepancy between the achieved score and the target score (Fig 5.3.2).

Differential Weighting

Differential weightings are given to each parameter. In a block consisting of equal weighting on quality and density, the remapped FAR score is amplified by 5 while OSR, CL, SFR and EV are multiplied by 2, 1, 1 and 1 respectively (Fig 5.3.4), so that the total score of the density and spatial qualities is identical. Meanwhile toggle values (VQ/ VD) are applied to ensure at least 20% of the upper limit values are achieved (Fig 5.3.3). The strategy mentioned above can be concluded with a

mathematical expression:

Total Score (QD) = ((FAR*5) + (OSR*2) + (CL*1) + (SFR*1) + (EV*1))* VQ * VD

Differential amplified factors are given to quality, quality-density and density blocks. The expression is linked to an Evolutionary solver as the fitness value to maximise.

90 91 Block Catalogue Generation SynchroniCity Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Open Space Ratio(OSR) Circulation Length (CL) South Facing Surface Ratio (SFR) Enclosure Value (EV) Fitness Criteria Value Score FAR 2.5 0.75 OSR 14% 0.40 CL 20 m 1.00 SFR 11% 0.38 EV 1.1 0.52 Large Plot Typology 2 50% 50% Q D
Fig 5.3.1 Parameters after remapped into a singular numerical domain
OSR = 14% CL = 20M SFR = 11 EV = 1.1 0% 20% 100% Toggle Value VD/VQ 0 1 FAR OSR CL SFR EV Threshold Value Amplify x 5 0.75 3.75 Amplify x 2 0.40 0.80 Amplify x 1.00 1.00 Amplify x 0.38 0.38 Amplify x 0.52 0.52 = = x x x x VD 1 VQ 1 + + + + + + + + FAR x 5 0.75 x 5 OSR x 2 0.40 x 2 CL x 1 1.00 x 1 SFR x 0.38 x 1 EV x 0.52 x 1 Different criteria categorised base on quality and density FAR OSR Quality Density CL SFR EV Q D 50% 50% Q D
Fig 5.3.2 Scores of Each Spatial Parameter
Genetic Algorithm
Fig 5.3.4 Mathematical Expression of Fitness Value
Original Domain < 1.0 0 1 1.0 3.0 2.5 0.75 > 3.0 0 1 0.4 < 10% 10% 20% 14% > 20% 0 > 80 m 80 m 20 m 30 m < 30 m 0 1 > 16% 16% 11% 0.38 8% < 8% 0 1 0 1.1 0.52 2.1 3 Target Domain FAR OSR CL SFR EV Density Requirement Density Requirement South Facing Surface Ratio South Facing Surface Ratio Open Space Ratio Open Space Ratio Enclosure Value Experiment 4 Enclosure Study Enclosure Value Experiment 5 Connectivity Logic Connectivity Logic Experiments Fitness Criteria Urban Infrastructure Quality Q Density D Extracted From Case Studies Indigenous Settlement
Fig 5.3.3 Adopted Boolean Remapping Strategy

5.3 Block Generation

Differential Weighting

The aim of the process is to create three typologies of blocks with different quality and density attributes. A number of test generations are experimented to calibrate the system to yield typologies that are considerably different. To achieve this, differential weighting is applied to the parameters in order to generate three different typologies (Fig 5.3.5): first typology having higher weighting on quality, second with equal weighting and third with higher weighting on density. Different weighting strategies are were attempted, a few examples are shown in Fig 5.3.6. Fitness criteria were amplified to different amounts based on the differential weightings strategies of each typology. To increase the difference input parameters were also modified to give more flexibility in terms of the open space ratio (Fig 5.3.5). The result shows difference in both FAR value and the building morphologies. The adopted weighting would be Quality preferred blocks : (Q:80 D:20), Equally weighted blocks : (Q:50 D:50), Density preferred blocks (Q:20 D:80).

92 93 Block Catalogue Generation SynchroniCity 50% 50% Q D 50% 50% Q D 70% 30% Q D 80% 20% Q D 30% 70% Q D 20% 80% Q D Typology 1 Typology 1 Typology 2 Typology 2 Typology 3 Typology 3 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Open Space Ratio(OSR) Circulation Length (CL) South Facing Surface Ratio (SFR) Enclosure Value (EV) FAR OSR Quality Density CL SFR EV Q D Open Space Ratio (OSR) Modified OSR Range Modified Weighting Original OSR Range Original Weighting 8 m 8 m 8 m 8 m 4 m 4 m 4 m 4 m 4 m 4 m 4 m 4 m x x x x 40 Units 44 Units 40 Units 36 Units OSR = 10% OSR = 10% OSR = 11% OSR = 9% OSR = 9% - 11% 64 m 64 m 64 m 64 m 640 m 640 m 582 m2 710 m Semi-public Space Total Built Area 8 m 8 m 8 m 8 m Q Q QD QD D D = = = = = = x x x x x x x x x x x x 1 1 1 1 1 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + FAR x 7 FAR x 8 FAR x 5 FAR x 5 FAR x 3 FAR x 2 OSR x 1.2 OSR x 0.8 OSR x 2 OSR x 2 OSR x 2.8 OSR x 3.2 CL x 0.6 CL x 0.4 CL x 1 CL x 1 CL x 1.4 CL x 1.6 SFR x 0.6 SFR x 0.4 SFR x SFR x SFR x 1.4 SFR x 1.6 EV x 0.6 EV x 0.4 EV x 1 EV x 1 EV x 1.4 EV x 1.6 OSR = 14% CL = 20M SFR = 11 EV = 1.1
Fig 5.3.5 Differentiated Weightages for Q/QD/D Blocks Fig 5.3.5 Modification on OSR Value
Typology 1 Average FAR: Highest FAR: 70% 30% Q D 60% 40% Q D 80% 20% Q D 1.70 2.01 1.29 1.35 1.62 1.83 Quality option Typology 3 1.97 2.00 1.37 1.50 Average FAR: Highest FAR: 2.99 3.29 30% 70% Q D 40% 60% Q D 20% 80% Q D Density option Typology 2 1.85 2.02 1.42 1.49 2.05 2.28 Average FAR: Highest FAR: 50% 50% Q D 50% 50% Q D 50% 50% Q D Quality-Density option
Fig 5.3.6 Differentiation of Q/QD/D Blocks after Modification

Evaluation 1

Sky View Factor

The aim of the evaluation is to measure the fitness level of the generation and short-list the best ones for further research. Sky view factor is chosen for the first part of the evaluation. This was because it was computationally difficult to analyse all the semipublic spaces for sky-view and other parameters simultaneously.

For evaluation, each of the semi-public space in the block is checked with for sky view factor and the lowest value was taken into consideration. If any one of the value is less than 0.5, that individual was eliminated. This would ensure that all the semipublic spaces always have some minimum quality.

Evaluation 2

Architectural Aspects

The second evaluation criteria is analysed based on the architectural aspects. This evaluation would help the design at the cluster level that deals with block aggregation. The blocks are evaluated on four aspects which allow small modifications or additions to improve the blocks performance at the cluster level.

The first criterion is the ability of the block to generate elevated network through the corridor like spaces. Second is the ability to create intra-building informal passageway that connect with different blocks. The blocks also should have extension capacity by performing simple extrusions from flat surfaces. Lastly the block should have capacity to connect to other blocks to create interbuilding passageways.

All the individuals are evaluated and if any block has two or more of these aspects, that would be selected for the block catalogue.

Evaluation Process

Evaluation chart for Large Plots (40 M X 40 M) SELECTED

Evaluation chart for Medium Plots (32 M X 32 M)

Evaluation chart for Small Plots (24 M X 24 M)

94 95 Block Catalogue Generation SynchroniCity Large Plot Evaluation Criteria 1 Generated Block Individuals Average Typology (Q) L_Q_01 L_Q_02 L_Q_03 L_Q_04 L_Q_05 L_Q_06 L_Q_07 L_Q_08 Sky View Factor 0.59 0.53 0.53 0.61 0.59 0.72 0.59 0.60 0.60 Typology 2 (QD) L_QD_01 L_QD_02 L_QD_03 L_QD_04 L_QD_05 L_QD_06 L_QD_07 L_QD_08 Sky View Factor 0.69 0.65 0.52 0.62 0.48 0.65 0.68 0.70 0.62 Typology 3 (D) L_D_01 L_D_02 L_D_03 L_D_04 L_D_05 L_D_06 L_D_07 L_D_08 Sky View Factor 0.54 0.48 0.53 0.50 0.38 0.42 0.42 0.51 0.47 Selected Individuals Evaluation 1 Evaluation 2 L_D_01 elimination of blocks not satisfying the sky view factor elimination of blocks not satisfying 2 of the architectural considerations L_D_01 Sky View Factor Architectural Aspects Medium Plot Evaluation Criteria 1 Generated Block Individuals Average Typology (Q) M_Q_01 M_Q_02 M_Q_03 M_Q_04 M_Q_05 M_Q_06 M_Q_07 M_Q_08 Sky View Factor 0.76 0.63 0.72 0.61 0.63 0.67 0.74 0.74 0.69 Typology 2 (QD) M_QD_01 M_QD_02 M_QD_03 M_QD_04 M_QD_05 M_QD_06 M_QD_07 M_QD_08 Sky View Factor 0.64 0.74 0.71 0.63 0.68 0.74 0.67 0.66 0.68 Typology 3 (D) M_D_01 M_D_02 M_D_03 M_D_04 M_D_05 M_D_06 M_D_07 M_D_08 Sky View Factor 0.45 0.43 0.43 0.47 0.74 0.66 0.71 0.66 0.57 Small Plot Evaluation Criteria 1 Generated Block Individuals Average Typology (Q) S_Q_01 S_Q_02 S_Q_03 S_Q_04 S_Q_05 S_Q_06 S_Q_07 S_Q_08 Sky View Factor 0.83 0.82 0.87 0.79 0.81 0.62 0.83 0.81 0.80 Typology 2 (QD) S_QD_01 S_QD_02 S_QD_03 S_QD_04 S_QD_05 S_QD_06 S_QD_07 S_QD_08 Sky View Factor 0.73 0.79 0.81 0.72 0.85 0.81 0.77 0.63 0.76 Typology 3 (D) S_D_01 S_D_02 S_D_03 S_D_04 S_D_05 S_D_06 S_D_07 S_D_08 Sky View Factor 0.84 0.71 0.75 0.80 0.86 0.76 0.80 0.84 0.80 L_Q_01 L_Q_03 L_Q_05 L_Q_07 L_QD_03 L_QD_04 M_Q_01 M_Q_02 M_Q_03 M_Q_05 M_QD_01 M_QD_04 S_Q_01 S_Q_02 S_Q_04 S_Q_06 S_QD_01 S_QD_05 L_QD_06 L_QD_07 L_D_01 L_D_03 L_D_04 L_D_08 M_QD_06 M_QD_07 M_D_05 M_D_06 M_D_07 M_D_08 S_QD_06 S_QD_08 S_D_02 S_D_06 S_D_07 S_D_08 Based on this SVF, the individual would be eliminated 0.45 < 0.5 0.96 0.91 0.76 0.80
INDIVIDUALS
Elevated network Extension capacity Informal path-way Interconnection capacity elevated corridor network extension capacity elevated corridor network extension capacity extension capacity elevated corridor network extension capacity informal passway interconnection capacity 1 2 3 4
Evaluation 5.3 Block
Fig 5.3.7 SVF Values of Each Semi-public Space Fig 5.3.8 Emergent Architectural Characteristics as Evaluation Criterion
Generation

Small Plot- Typology 1 (Q)

40QD40D32Q32QD32D24Q24QD24D

32QD32D24Q24QD24D

40Q40QD40D32Q32QD32D24Q24QD24D

32QD32D24Q24QD24D

40QD40D32Q32QD32D24Q24QD24D

40Q40QD40D32Q32QD32D24Q24QD24D

32QD32D24Q24QD24D

For the comparative analysis of quality aspects for the semi-public spaces, block level morphologies are investigated. Quality criteria have been extracted from both the indigenous settings. But the design focuses over a specific environmental condition similar to Ranwar Village in Mumbai. Thus the case study of this settlement is chosen to compare with the proposed block and cluster design.

From the proposed block design, all three typologies and their sub-categories of large, medium and small plots are considered for comparison with settings in Ranwar Village. The comparison of density criteria shows that, the value of FAR in the typology 3 is highest for all the three sizes of plots. In the largest plot size, the value is significantly high at 2.99. Looking at the semi-public space per built up ratio, the small plots have the highest ratio with an average of 14% which is the closest that the system is able to achieve to the 25% in the Ranwar Village.

98 99 Block Catalogue Generation SynchroniCity S_Q_01 S_Q_04 S_Q_02 S_Q_06 4.85 3.50 2.43 5.74 3.83 2.03 5.71 3.95 2.52 5.89 4.17 1.51 1.82 1.51 1.34 2.07 1.04 1.82 1.82 1.04 1.76 1.76 1.01 2.30 3.02 8.80 12.33 3.12 9.10 12.74 3.12 9.72 14.49 4.53 7.55 12.74
Small Plot-
2 (QD) Small
3 (D) 80% 50% 20% 20% 50% 80% S_QD_06 S_QD_01 S_QD_08 S_QD_05 S_D_08 S_D_02 S_D_06 S_D_07 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR
FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR OSR CL FAR SFR OSR CL FAR SFR OSR CL FAR SFR OSR CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL
Typology
Plot- Typology
24Q24QD24D
FAR SFR OSR CL FAR SFR OSR CL FAR SFR OSR CL FAR SFR OSR CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL SFR CL FAR SFR OSR CL FAR SFR OSR CL FAR SFR OSR CL SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL
FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL OSR CL OSR CL OSR CL OSR CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL
FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL OSR CL OSR CL OSR CL OSR CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL 40QD40D32Q32QD32D24Q24QD24D FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL OSR CL OSR CL OSR CL OSR CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL
FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL OSR CL OSR CL OSR CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL
40QD40D32Q32QD32D24Q24QD24D
FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL OSR CL OSR CL OSR CL OSR CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL
FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL OSR CL OSR CL OSR CL OSR CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL
FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL
40QD40D32Q32QD32D24Q24QD24D
FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL
FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL FAR SFR EV OSR SVF CL Quality Density Q D Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Open Space Ratio(OSR) Circulation Length (CL) South Facing Surface Ratio (SFR) Enclosure Value (EV) OSR FAR CL SFR EV
Parameters Ranwar Village Large Plot Medium Plot Small Plot Plot Area 314 1600 1600 1600 1024 1024 1024 576 576 576 Total Built Up Area (m ) 572 7798 9849 14364 5609 5965 6570 2062 2762 3300 Semi-public Space Area (m2) 50 1248 1379 1724 954 835 1117 619 580 726 FAR 0.61 1.62 2.05 2.99 1.83 1.94 2.14 1.19 1.60 1.91 Semi-public Space Per Built Up Ratio 25% 16% 14% 12% 17% 14% 17% 30% 21% 22% South Facing Surface Ratio 15% 9% 11% 12% 11% 11% 11% 12% 11% 11% Typology 1 Q Typology Q Typology 1 Q Typology 2 Q D Typology 2 Q D Typology 2 Q D Typology 3 D Typology 3 D Typology 3 D 5.5
3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0 20% 10% 0 FAR Semi-public Space Per Built Up Ratio South Facing Surface Ratio Large Plot Ranwar Village Samples Samples Samples Samples T1 T1 T1 T2 T2 T2 T3 T3 T3 Medium Plot Small Plot
Conclusion
Fig 5.3.9 Scores of Spatial Parameters
Village
Block
Comparative Analysis Ranwar
Proposed
Design

5.5 Conclusion Comparative Analysis

The other quality criteria are compared with each other and only the south facing surface ratio has a overall lower value. This could be due to the square geometry of the plot which during the generation process makes it difficult to achieve a high proportion of south facing surfaces for the built morphology. In other criteria, the result has shown that the quality in terms of the parameters that were chosen has been well maintained with significant increase in density. For certain other quality criteria the overall quality value in the proposed design exceeds the value found in Ranwar Village.

The generation process was able to create distinct individuals that prioritise different aspects of the fitness criteria. The three typologies within the catalogue showed variation in terms of plot sizes, density and quality. The FAR values of individuals varied from a minimum of 1.01 to a maximum of 3.08. Understandably, the quality decreases as the density increases. The threshold values of different fitness criteria ensured a certain minimum value of quality within the individuals, and similar threshold values for density (FAR 1) ensured that it was also at par with the urban demands.

The variation in the block typologies ensured differentiation of spaces at every level even in the residential typologies, which is not common in urban scenarios.

Depending on the site requirements in terms of density and quality different individuals from the catalogue can be selected for aggregation at the cluster level. Evaluation criteria 2 ensure that the blocks have a possibility to aggregate and make small modifications or additions to improve the spatial quality.

100 101 Block Catalogue Generation SynchroniCity Parameters Ranwar Village Large Plot Enclosure 1.34 1.11 1.11 1.39 1.08 Sky View Factor 0.60 0.60 0.62 0.47 0.69 Shaded Area Proportion 25% 22% 24% 27% 20% Typology 1 Q Typology 1 Q Typology 2 Q D Typology 3 D 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0 Samples Samples Sky View Factor Enclosure
Fig 5.3.9 Scores of Spatial Parameters

Step I

6

Step II

CLUSTER CATALOGUE GENERATION

CLUSTER GENERATION PLOT / FOOTPRINT AGGREGATION POPULATING THE CLUSTER PLOTS

The cluster level focusses on developing aggregation with relation to the local public level spaces. The selected individuals from the block design catalogue would be aggregated to form the cluster. The aim is to generate three types of cluster with differential weighting on quality and density. The design for clusters will be processed in two steps: Different plot layouts will be arranged and evaluated to yield one arrangement for each type of cluster in the first step of design. The second step will deal with selecting the appropriate block from the catalogue for each plot location depending on various environmental and density factors. Block – block relationship will also be considered in this step. These generated clusters will be further evaluated based on architectural aspect. These individuals will form the cluster design catalogue that can be adopted for larger scale design development.

102 103 Cluster Catalogue Generation SynchroniCity
Aggregation
Design Inputs
Generation Process
Cluster Level Catalogue
Conclusion 104 110 114 119 121
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5

6.1 Aggregation Inputs

Minimum radius: 30 m

Maximum radius: 50 m

Maximum radius: 100 m

Walking distance: about 1 min Walking distance: about min Walking distance: about 2 min Walking distance: about 1/2 min

Public Space and Cluster Size

The design attempts to utilize the distinct cultural characteristic of having a central public space surrounded by the built forms to work like Chowks in Mumbai. In the previous study of the indigenous settings, the fabric was divided into smaller clusters depending on the proximity of buildings to the closest public space. Various clusters from these settings were studied and an observation was made that these public spaces cater to a diameter from 60m to 100m (Fig 6.1.1) This distance was equivalent to about 1 to 2 minutes’ walk.

A parallel study was carried out to understand the area requirements of a community level public space. Various squares in the Mumbai urban setting were studied, they were mapped for their daily and seasonal activities that take place in these sites. These squares were the cultural hubs for their locality. A number of activities like informal market settings, informal interaction spaces and workshops are accommodated on daily basis. These spaces not only holds religious significance, occasionally these

spaces were converted into gathering spots for festive occasions. These activities are accommodated within a radius of 20m - 25m, an aspect that was seen in most of the squares. This study would help to form a basis for considering the area requirement of the community level public space as a starting point.

The sizes of central public space to be used in the design stage would be 25m x 25m. As this size was larger than the ones found in the indigenous settlements, the built forms that it caters to should also increase proportionally. However, to maintain walk-ability to this space, the walking distance should not exceed 3 to 4 minutes, which is approximately a radius of 95m - 100m.

Experiment 1 Position of Plots

The earlier study informed the sizes of public space that the plots can be aggregated around. Each plot is given an offset width of 4m in order to create the initial street width. In order to achieve the maximum sky view factor on the central public space, different plot aggregation strategies were experimented. The figure shows two of the examples, one with the largest and other with the smallest plots closest to the public space. Typical blocks were selected from the block design catalogue for these experiments. All the results have shown that the sky view factor is either similar or better than the indigenous setting. It is essential to mention that the best sky view factor was needed at this stage so when the individual blocks get modified and increase in height where they don’t affect the quality of public space dramatically.

It was observed that to maintain a higher sky view factor similar to the indigenous settings, smaller plots need to be closest, and the larger plots furthest away from the central open space. This would be informed to aggregate the plots in the next stage.

Experiment 2

Plot Numbers

This experiment was conducted to derive the most efficient number of plots to be aggregated around a single public space within a distance of 60m - 100m, which is an ideal walking distance to a public space.

To investigate this, 9, 12 and 15 plots were aggregated around a public space with equal number of small, medium and large plots, thereby simplifying the complexity of choosing the plots from the catalogue. The 9, 12 and 15 plots catered to a radius of 75 m, 90 m and 95 m respectively. It was observed that for a public space of the size 25m x 25m, the 75m radius would be too small to create a sufficient cluster size. Further, the packing of the 12 and 15 plots did not drastically change the radius to which it catered. However the aggregation with 15 plots was more efficient as the percentage covered was consistently around 72% of the area of walking radius.

It was concluded that the aggregation of 15 plots provided the most efficient packing catering to a diameter of 95m which is within a range of 1-2 minutes walking distance.

104 105 Cluster Catalogue Generation SynchroniCity
60 m 120 m 100 m 200 m
Derived From Case Studies Community Level Public Space Average area of public space Average area of public space Mumbai Based on uses of activity 251 m2 600 m Design Logic Defining Cluster Size Public Space Area Public Space Size Cluster Size Design Input Urban Infrastructure Derived From Case Studies Indigenous Settlement
Minimum radius: 60 m
Fig 6.1.1 Spatial Organisation of Typical Clusters in Mumbai
a a’ Section a - a’ SVF 0.91 Aggregation type 2 Large plot in the centre Aggregation type Small plot in the centre Section c c’ SVF : 0.75 c c’ 85 121
Fig 6.1.5 Sky View Factor Comparison
Maximum radius: 95 m Walking distance: Around min Walking distance: Around 1.5 min Walking distance: Around 2 min Minimum radius: 75 m Minimum radius: 90 m sample sample 2 sample 3 sample 4 sample 5 Average 9 Plots (3L, 3M, 3S) Coverage Area (m2) 17671 17671 17671 17671 17671 17671 Plot area (m ) 12271 12000 11709 11276 11947 11841 Percentage Covered 69% 68% 66% 64% 68% 67% 12 Plots (4L, 4M, 4S) Coverage Area (m2) 25447 25447 25447 25447 25447 25447 Plot area (m ) 15777 15268 16032 15268 16286 15726 Percentage Covered 62% 60% 63% 60% 64% 62% 15 Plots (5L, 5M, 5S) Coverage Area (m2) 28353 28353 28353 28353 28353 28353 Plot area (m ) 20981 21265 19847 20698 19847 20528 Percentage Covered 74% 75% 70% 73% 70% 72% Result of three plot aggregation experiments
Fig 6.1.2 Dahi Handi Festival in Mumbai Fig 6.1.3 Holi festival in Mumbai Fig 6.1.4 Workshops and events in Mumbai

Logic

Aggregation Logic

Aggregation of plots is the first stage of this design stage, which aims to generate the plot layouts for each typology of cluster. Each aggregation only holds the information of the plot sizes of blocks (24 x 24 M, 32 X32 M & 40 X 40M). Rectangle packing algorithm is used to generate a number of iterations which could be selected depending on the evaluation criteria. This is described in the following topic.

106 107 Cluster Catalogue Generation SynchroniCity Design Logic Derived From Case Studies Parameters Public Space Defining Cluster Size Experiment 1 Position of Plots Public Space Area Experiment 2 Plot Numbers Position of Plots Public Space Size Cluster Size Pocket Space Area Distribution Of Pocket Space Geometry of Pocket Space Radius: 90 m 25 m 25 m Design Input Parameter Evaluation Experiments Urban Infrastructure Plot Numbers
Large Good Geometry Irregular Geometry Medium Small Sky view Factor
Pocket Space Area Position of Blocks Distribution Of Pocket Space Geometry of Pocket Space Design Input Parameter Evaluation 1 Evaluation 2 Evaluation 3 Plot Generation Cluster Generation Number of Blocks In Cluster Cluster 1 Cluster 1 Cluster 1 1 Site Plot Site Plot Site Plot 10 Site Plot Smallest Largest Average 15 Blocks 15 Blocks 15 Blocks Cluster 3 Cluster 3 Cluster 3 Cluster 2 Cluster 2 Cluster 2 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q D D D D D D D D Large Block Medium Block 15 Blocks Small Block x 5 x 5 x 5 Block Design Catalogue Block Size Large Small Medium Typology 2 4 4 4 Typology 3 4 4 4 Typology 4 4 4 Rectangle Packing Algorithm Plot Aggregation
6.1 Aggregation
Indigenous Settlement

6.1 Aggregation Generation & Evaluation

Evaluation / Selection of Plot Aggregations

Various aggregations with 15 plots are generated on the basis of the first two experiments. The aim of this evaluation is to select different aggregation for different applications. The evaluation checks the kind of porosity suitable for each kind of cluster. Three packing arrangements are desired on the basis of porosity.

Each of the aggregated plots is evaluated on three evaluation criteria. The plots are first evaluated on the basis of the amount of porosity i.e. the area of pocket spaces formed. The aggregation with higher porosity would be used for quality preferred typologies. Packing with low porosity can be used for high density typologies. They were also evaluated on the basis of the distribution of the

pocket spaces. Well distributed and numerous pocket spaces were preferred to few and large concentrated ones. The last evaluation criteria looked into the geometry of these spaces. Narrow and long pocket spaces would potentially have poor spatial quality compared with the square shaped, which could be utilised to create better social spaces within the cluster.

Three plot aggregations are selected after the evaluation process, one for each cluster typology. These would be used in the cluster generation stage.

108 109 Cluster Catalogue Generation SynchroniCity
Large Plot Medium Plot Small Plot 40 m 32 m 24 m 40 m 32 m 24 m 2 3 1 Cluster 1 C_01 C_08 C_08 C_03 C_07 C_07 C_10 C_05 C_05 C_09 C_02 C_04 C_06 Good Distribution Good Distribution More pocket space created compare to C_03 Good Distribution Very liner space geometry compare to C_07 Good Distribution More liner space compare to C_08 Good Distribution Good square shaped spaces Poor Distribution Poor Distribution Poor Distribution 459 m2 980 m2 803 m 1148 m 403 m 819 m2 819 m 971 m2 1391 m 1343 m Cluster 3 Cluster 2 Q Q D D Cluster 1 Evaluation Criteria Plot Evaluation Geometry of pocket space Square shape preferred Well distributed Largest Average Smallest Well distributed Well distributed Square shape preferred Square shape preferred Distribution of pocket space Pocket space area Cluster 3 Cluster 2 Q Q D D 2 3 1
Fig 6.1.2 Spatial Organisation of Generated Q/QD/D Clusters
C_01 C_02 C_03 C_04 C_05 C_06 Plot Plot Pocket space Pocket space C_07 C_08 C_09 C_10 Cluster Cluster 3 Cluster 2 Q Q D C_01 C_02 C_03 C_04 C_05 C_06 C_07 C_08 C_09 C_10 Average Plot area (m2 20991 20474 20448 20760 19401 20053 20148 21253 20601 20592 21623 Pocket space area (m2 1391 803 819 1148 459 403 819 1343 980 971 914 Q Q D D D

6.2 Design Input Parameters Experiments

South Facing Surface Ratio

Block

Semi-public Space

Selection Commands

Quality Criteria

Public Space

Non Uniform Scaling Selection Commands

Mirror Vertical, Horizontal Rotation 180o

Cluster Adjacent Block Relation

Circulation length (CL) Circulation length (CL) Circulation length (CL) Circulation length (CL)

Sky View Factor (SVF)

South Facing Surface Ratio (SFR)

Floor Area Ratio (FAR)

Enclosure Value (EV)

Open Space Ratio (OSR)

Shaded Area Proportion (SAP)

Criteria affected

Criteria not affected

Sky View Factor (SVF) Sky View Factor (SVF) Sky View Factor (SVF)

South Facing Surface Ratio (SFR) South Facing Surface Ratio (SFR) South Facing Surface Ratio (SFR)

Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Floor Area Ratio (FAR)

Enclosure Value (EV) Enclosure Value (EV) Enclosure Value (EV)

Open Space Ratio (OSR) Open Space Ratio (OSR) Open Space Ratio (OSR)

Shaded Area Proportion (SAP)

Cluster Generation

Using the previous plot aggregations with the operational flexibility and variable block selection from the block design catalogue, three types of clusters will be generated. Cluster with high weighting on quality, clusters with equal weighting of quality and density and the last one with high weighting on density.

Different quality and density parameters will be used as fitness criteria on all of the clusters. Depending on the criteria, a set of individual blocks would be selected to be placed on the designated plots obtained from aggregation. The process would look into block - block relationship so as to not affect the parameters optimised during the block generation stage.

Criteria Optimisation

A number of different parameters have been considered for testing the spatial quality. The logic diagram above shows the operations considered with respect to the block and the cluster generation, which also describe the levels at when the criteria was adopted. Experiments were conducted to understand the effect of the subsequent operation on the various parameters. At the same time, attempts were made to minimise this effect on the quality criteria produced during the previous stages. To adapt to the selection process, each block had the flexibility to optimise the sky view factor in order to develop the adjacent block relations. Parameters like shaded area proportion would be used at the final stage of cluster generation after the orientation of the blocks gets fixed.

Block Scaling Experiment 3

The aim of this experiment is to understand and analyse the effect on the quality criteria of semi-public spaces when the blocks are imposed with non-uniform scaling. All the criteria are considered, however the open space ratio, enclosure factor and floor area ratio are not affected by this operation.

Circulation length would only be affected when the block is scaled up as the length increases, it would also exceed the optimised value. When the block is scaled down, the visible area to the sky decreases thus the sky view factor would decrease. The south facing surface ratio would be affected majority if the ratio of the south facing surface increases over the sum of other faces, this was tested with

that specific rule of scaling. Thus, these parameters were tested for their specific operations.

Conclusion

Non uniform scaling does not affect three of the quality parameters. It was also observed that the block can be scaled by 5% without affecting the quality criteria drastically. This aspect allows higher flexibility to blocks for achieving better packing.

110 111 Cluster Catalogue Generation SynchroniCity
Q
Circulation Length Sky View Factor SFR 0.15 CL 55 m SVF : 0.56 SFR : 0.16 CL : 57 m (Scaling in 2 dimensions ) (Scaling in 2 dimensions ) (Scaling in 2 dimensions ) SVF 0.54 SFR 0.18 CL 59 m SVF 0.52 SFR 0.20 CL 61 m SVF 0.49 SFR 0.23 CL 64 m SVF : 0.44 SFR 0.25 CL : 67 m SVF 0.42 SFR 0.28 CL 70 m SVF : 0.36 + 7.5 % 7.5 % - 7.5 % + 10 % 10 % - 10 % + 12.5 % 12.5 % - 12.5 % + 15 % 15 % - 15 % + 5 % 5 % - 5 % + 2.5 % 2.5 % - 2.5 % Original Original Original
6.2.1
Fig
Comparison between Original/ Scaled Geometries

6.2 Design Inputs

Block Design Catalogue

Block Selection

Depending on the desired result in terms of density and quality, the typology of individual blocks in the cluster is varied. For example, for cluster 1 which has a high quality weightage, (Fig 6.2.1), more typology 1 blocks with high weighting on quality would be used. The rest of the plot footprints have the flexibility to choose from typology 2 or typology 3 blocks. This process was continued for all the three sizes of blocks aggregated to form each cluster. Fig 6.2.1

Block Selection and Modification

The generation system is based on flexibility to select blocks and arrange them synchronously with the given rule set. An evolutionary solver is introduced to evaluate the condition of adjacent façades. The diagram demonstrates four blocks that needs to be aggregated. With different aggregations, the sky view factor of the selected semi-public space varies. The algorithm attempts to optimise sky view factor and the block-block relationship by rearranging or modifying the blocks. These operations are aimed at improving spatial quality by maintaining the sky view factor of each semi-public space so that the impact on overall quality during

aggregation is minimum.

In order to expand the block design catalogue and increase the number of options in the selection process, different modification operations were introduced. Each blocks could rotate 1800, mirror in X and Y axis or perform both the options at the same time. These operations were carefully chosen as none of the parameters with respect to environmental quality criteria get affected. With the addition of modification command in the selection process, each block can have up to four possible typologies to select from.

112 113 Cluster Catalogue Generation SynchroniCity Cluster 1 Cluster 3 Cluster 2 Q Q D D Q Q Q Q D D D D
Block Size Large Small Medium Typology 2 4 4 4 Typology 3 4 4 4 Typology 1 4 4 4 Large Large Block x 5 x 5 x 5 Large Large 40 m 40 m 40 m 40 m 40 m 40 m 40 m 40 m L_Q_01 L_Q_05 L_Q_03 L_Q_07 Typology 2 Typology 3 L_QD_06 L_QD_03 L_QD_07 L_QD_04 L_D_08 L_D_01 L_D_03 L_D_04 Typology 1 Cluster 1 Cluster 3 Cluster 2 Q Q Q D Q D D D Large Block Typology 1 Large Block Medium Block 15 Blocks Small Block Typology 2 Typology 3 x 5 x 5 x 5 x 5 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 5 5 5 2 3 2,1,0 0,1,2
Sky View Factor Rotate 180 Flip Y Axis Flip X Axis Original Block selection and modification
SVF: 0.70 SVF: 0.64 SVF: 0.54 SVF: 0.49 SVF:
Fig 6.2.2 Spatial Parameters Optimised by Geometry Modifications Block Selection Block - Block Relationship

6.3 Generation Process

Cluster Generation Logic

Three clusters with differential weightings on quality and density will be generated based on the design inputs discussed in the early part of the chapter. These clusters will be evaluated on the ground pedestrian network on aspects that form part of the design ambitions. A few parameters which could not be optimised at the block level will be considered higher design levels. This would help the blocks to adapt to the cluster generation, thus provide the final cluster design catalogue.

114 115 Cluster Catalogue Generation SynchroniCity Cluster Density FAR Design Logic Parameters Parameters Public Space Semi-public Space Connectivity With Street Solar Radiation Enclosure Shaded Area Proportion Block Edge Condition Public Space Quality Adjacent Block Relation Density Requirement Enclosure Shaded Area Proportion Solar Radiation Experiment 3 Block Scaling Cluster Generation Block Scaling Street Offset Pedestrian Network Original W H 15% scale in x,y Experiments Design Input Fitness Criteria Evaluation Urban Infrastructure
Sky view Factor Quality Q Density D Derived From Case Studies Indigenous Settlement Mirror Block Selection And Modification Ground network Design Input Fitness Criteria Genetic Algorithm Evaluation 1 Cluster Generation Catalogue Patch Generation Cluster 1 Cluster 1 10 Clusters 4 Clusters 4 Clusters 4 Clusters 4 Clusters Cluster 3 Cluster 3 Cluster 2 Cluster 2 The cluster generation process can select the individuals from the block generation catalogue based on the criteria The blocks can be selected depending on the desired result in terms of density and quality in each cluster 10 clusters were generated that could be further evaluated. Q Q Q Q Q Q Q D D Q D D D D D D Large Block Typology 1 Large Block Medium Block 15 Blocks Small Block Typology 2 Typology 3 x 5 x 5 x 5 x 5 Block Design Catalogue Block Size Large Small Medium Typology 2 4 4 4 Typology 3 4 4 4 Typology 1 4 4 4 Plot Generation Cluster 1 1 Plot 1 Plot Plot Cluster 3 Cluster 2 Q Q D D Cluster Generation 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 2 3
Logic

6.3 Generation Process Fitness Criteria Evaluation

Remapping Parameters and Differential Weighting

Similar to the strategy introduced at block level, parameters that address either density or quality are first remapped into a [0, 1] domain (Fig 6.4.1) and then given differentiated weights. During this process, FAR criterion is amplified by 5 while Block Edge Condition(BEC),Incident Solar Radiation (ISR), Shaded Area Proportion (SAP),Enclosure Value (EV) are multiplied by 2, 1, 1 and 1 respectively. Thus mathematical expression can be concluded as:

Identical amplification factors are given to all the generated cluster morphologies and an Evolutionary Solver will be linked to this expression which will aim to maximise the weighted sum value.

Evaluation Criteria

Pedestrian Network

One of the project ambitions is to create an informal pedestrian network similar to Chowks in Mumbai and Hutongs in Beijing, therefore the clusters get evaluated on the ground network on these two factors, centralised network pattern (Fig 6.4.2), and the continuous ring streets (Fig 6.4.3). The analysis took into account not only the pedestrian networks, but also the informal passages that were formed within the individual blocks.

The first criteria centralised network pattern, would measure on the connectivity of the public space to the edges of the cluster. The second criteria would help to select clusters which consist of the

longest continuous ring streets that could improve connectivity around the boundary. More variation of pedestrian network would be created in the cluster, which could provide more diversity in social spaces.

116 117 Cluster Catalogue Generation SynchroniCity
Cluster Density FAR Parameters Public Space Semi-public Space Solar Radiation Enclosure Shaded Area Proportion Block Edge Condition Public Space Quality Adjacent Block Relation Density Requirement Enclosure Shaded Area Proportion Solar Radiation Sky view Factor Quality Q Density D Fitness Criteria Urban Infrastructure Original Domain < 1.0 0 1.0 2.0 1.91 0.98 > 3.0 0 1 > 10% 10% 8% < 10% 0 0.38 > 430 430 370 410 < 370 0 1 > 8% 10% 0.83 8% < 8% 0 1 >0.70 0.70 0.45 <0.45 0.66 0.08 Target Domain FAR BEC ISR SAP EV Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Block Edge Condition(BEC) Incident Solar Radiation (ISR) Shaded Area Proportion (SAP) Enclosure Value (EV) Parameters were weighted by the given amplification values Fitness Criteria Value Score FAR 1.91 0.98 BEC 8% 1.00 ISR 410 0.38 SAP 10% 0.92 EV 0.66 0.08 Cluster 3 D
Total Score = (FAR x 5) + (BEC x 2) + (ISR x 1) + (SAP x 1) + (EV x 1)
FAR BEC ISR SAP EV Amplify x 5 0.98 4.90 Amplify x 2 1.00 2.00 Amplify x 1 0.38 0.38 Amplify x 1 0.92 0.92 Amplify x 1 0.08 0.08 = + + + + FAR x 5 BEC x 2 ISR x SAP x EV x Cluster 1 Cluster 3 Cluster 2 Q Q D D Derived From Case Studies Indigenous Settlement
6.4.1 Design Logic Connectivity With Street Pedestrian Network Evaluation
network pattern Continuous ring streets 1 2 Derived From Case Studies Indigenous Settlement
Fig
Centralised
Fig 6.4.2 Fig 6.4.3

SAP(shadedareaproportion)

6.3 Generation Process Evaluation

GENERATED ITERATIONS EVALUATION

Centralised

SELECTED CLUSTERS FOR CATALOGUE

SAP(shadedareaproportion)

SAP(shadedareaproportion)

118 119 Cluster Catalogue Generation SynchroniCity C_Q_01 C_Q_02 C_Q_03 C_Q_06 C_QD_10 C_QD_04 C_QD_03 C_QD_01 3.76 3.19 2.73 3.66 3.08 3.61 3.10 2.61 1.22 1.20 1.23 1.17 1.51 1.49 1.52 1.54 0.55 0.45 0.55 0.40 2.50 2.40 2.65 2.70 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q D D D D D D D D FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Q Q D Quality Density Q D BEC FAR ISR SAP EV Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Block Edge Condition(BEC) Incident Solar Radiation (ISR) Shaded Area Proportion (SAP) Enclosure Value (EV) 6.4 Cluster Design Catalogue FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR
DQDQ
Q1
FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR
Q10
FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR Q1 Q10 SAP(shadedareaproportion) SAP ISR SAP ISR SAP ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR Q1 DQDQ FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR Q1 DQDQ SAP ISR SAP ISR SAP ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR Q1 DQDQ FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR FAR FAR FAR SAP EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR FAR SAP EV ISR Q1 DQDQ FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR Q10
Public Space Area (m ) Population FAR Incident Solar Radiation (Wh/m ) Enclosure Value Shaded Area C_Q_01 892 1282 1.21 371 0.45 16% C_Q_02 974 1253 1.18 398 0.61 6% C_Q_03 1007 1289 1.21 388 0.57 8% C_Q_04 925 1293 1.22 390 0.50 8% C_Q_05 1100 1288 1.21 389 0.41 8% C_Q_06 1049 1234 1.16 384 0.52 9% C_Q_07 960 1188 1.12 380 0.42 6% C_Q_08 1030 1295 1.22 377 0.58 9% C_Q_09 1000 1213 1.14 390 0.68 7% C_Q_10 1065 1298 1.22 360 0.61 12% Public Space Area (m ) Population FAR Incident Solar Radiation (Wh/m2 Enclosure Value Shaded Area C_QD_01 849 1517 1.51 392 0.64 9% C_QD_02 1032 1499 1.49 387 0.78 10% C_QD_03 865 1513 1.50 413 0.51 6% C_QD_04 847 1493 1.48 420 0.51 5% C_QD_05 862 1452 1.44 413 0.50 6% C_QD_06 860 1521 1.51 406 0.62 5% C_QD_07 887 1513 1.50 399 0.62 7% C_QD_08 835 1520 1.51 412 0.49 6% C_QD_09 888 1507 1.50 400 0.55 8% C_QD_10 866 1501 1.49 413 0.50 7% Public Space Area (m ) Population FAR Incident Solar Radiation (Wh/m ) Enclosure Value Shaded Area C_D_01 867 1918 1.98 403 0.51 8% C_D_02 815 1854 1.91 410 0.61 7% C_D_03 818 1857 1.91 410 0.66 10% C_D_04 889 1843 1.90 385 0.72 11% C_D_05 818 1849 1.91 408 0.72 6% C_D_06 878 1830 1.89 375 0.78 10% C_D_07 890 1843 1.90 385 0.72 11% C_D_08 894 1905 1.96 394 0.65 9% C_D_09 866 1918 1.98 401 0.63 8% C_D_10 860 1953 2.01 391 0.67 9%
Pattern and Longest Continuous Ring Street
C_Q_01 C_Q_02 C_Q_03 C_Q_04 C_Q_05 C_Q_06 C_Q_07 C_Q_08 C_Q_09 C_Q_10 C_Q_01 C_Q_02 C_Q_03C_Q_06-C_QD_01 C_QD_02 C_QD_03 C_QD_04 C_QD_05 C_QD_06 C_QD_07 C_QD_08 C_QD_09 C_QD_10 C_QD_01C_QD_03 C_QD_04--C_QD_10 C_D_01 C_D_02 C_D_03 C_D_04 C_D_05 C_D_06 C_D_07 C_D_08 C_D_09 C_D_10-C_D_04C_D_07 C_D_08C_D_10

6.4 Cluster Design Catalogue

Cluster Design Catalogue

Clusters in the catalogue contain variation in density, quality with well distributed semi-public spaces at elevated levels within them.

The modified clusters have a population varying from 500 people/ ha in cluster 1 to 1000 people/ha in cluster 3. These clusters form a design catalogue with variable density and quality configurations that can be aggregated to develop a larger urban scenario.

6.5 Conclusion Comparative Study

The three clusters show great variation in the density that they are able to achieve. The density of Cluster typology 1 is almost half of that of typology 3. The increase is consistent from quality preferred to density preferred. Such is not the case for quality where the density preferred clusters were able to achieve a higher average quality that the equally weighted ones. This is an anomaly that may be attributed to the plot aggregation. Although all 3 typologies of clusters reach around 40% of the open space per person ratio of the Ranwar Village, it has been able to increment the population density by 300% - 400%. The cluster 1 shares a similar size and height with the Ranwar Village, and the previous comparisons have proved that it was able to maintain similar quality while insignificantly increasing density. To compare it with the cluster 2 and 3, the scale of built form is larger with building height over 20 meters while maintaining a similar quality value. Overall, Cluster 2 has a much better scale of the built morphology, and it was able to create more pocket spaces similar to Cluster 1.

120 121 Cluster Catalogue Generation SynchroniCity C_D_10 C_D_08 C_D_07 C_D_04 2.02 2.19 2.67 1.77 2.06 2.01 1.96 1.95 5.00 4.95 4.85 4.85 Q Q Q Q D D D D FAR FAR FAR FAR Cluster 3 D FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR BEC EV FAR BEC EV FAR BEC EV Q10 SAP(shadedareaproportion) FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR BEC EV FAR BEC EV FAR BEC EV Q10 SAP(shadedareaproportion) FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR Q10 SAP(shadedareaproportion) SAP ISR SAP ISR SAP ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR BEC BEC BEC SAP ISR SAP ISR SAP ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR FAR SAP BEC EV ISR SAP ISR SAP ISR SAP ISR
Q1 DQDQ
Parameters Proposed Cluster Design Plot Area 21253 20148 19401 Total Built Up Area (m2) 25594 30551 38739 Semi-public Space Area (m ) 7157 8397 8817 Public Space Area (m2) 2324 1676 1292 Open Space Area (m2) 9481 10073 10109 Living Area Per Person (m2) 20 20 20 Population 1280 1528 1937 Population Density (p/ha) 602 758 998 FAR 1.20 1.52 2.00 Cluster 1 Q Cluster 2 Q D Cluster 3 D Incident Solar Radiation (wh/m2) 385 410 389 Shaded Area Proportion 10% 7% 10% Enclosure Value 0.54 0.54 0.69 Sky View Factor 0.84 0.81 0.79 Semi-public Space Per Person (m2) 5.59 5.50 4.55 Public Space Per Person (m ) 1.82 1.10 0.67 Open Space Per Person (m ) 7.41 6.59 5.22 Parameters Proposed Cluster Design Cluster 1 Q Cluster 2 Q D Cluster 3 D Overall Density Quality Comparison Parameters Proposed Cluster Design Density Score 1.20 1.52 2.00 Quality Score 2.39 2.02 2.05 Overall Score 3.59 3.54 4.05 Cluster 1 Q Cluster 2 Q D Cluster 3 D 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0 Incident Solar Radiation Shaded Area Proportion Enclosure Value Sky View Factor Quality Score Density Score (FAR) Cluster 1 Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 2 Cluster 3 Cluster 3

Cluster 1

Plot Area: 21253 m

Coverage Radius: 93 m

Number of Semi-public Space: 93

This cluster typology is closest to the indigenous settings in terms of parametric quality aspects. It however supports the least density. The distribution of semi-public spaces and open space per person ratio is highest in this type of cluster. Therefore it is ideal for locations where density is not the primary concern.

Cluster 2

Plot Area: 20148 m

Coverage Radius: 79 m

Number of Semi-public Space: 79

This cluster typology shows the best balance of density and quality attributes. It is a intermediate version of Cluster typology and Cluster typology 3. Therefore has the most flexibility in application

Cluster 3

Plot Area: 19401 m

Coverage Radius: 69 m

Number of Semi-public Space: 69

This cluster typology is the preferred choice for high density scenarios. The building proportions in this cluster start relating to the contemporary urban morphologies but still maintain high proportion of open semi-public spaces.

6.5 Conclusion

The process of cluster generation was able to achieve an evolutionary urban morphology consisting of varied streetscapes that provide different spatial experiences and shaded pocket spaces.

These aspects were similar to the indigenous settings and can be converted into interesting social spaces and mid-rise block typologies with multi-level open spaces. The morphology of the clusters were able to achieve spaces that could be used for informal activities and the different block typologies were able to add further spatial variation. Different cluster morphologies

could be generated with the ability of blocks to adapt to different organization. The sectional study enforces this point where similar blocks were able to generate variety of spaces, it also showed a very even distribution of semi-public spaces within the built form. The elevated network was not only able to integrate the semi-public spaces but was also able to make the spaces more accessible. The generated catalogue consisting of clusters that show noticeable variation in spaces, density and quality can be used for designing of urban patches with different requirements.

122 123 Cluster Catalogue Generation SynchroniCity
C_Q_02 C_QD_01 C_D_04 Cluster 1 Q Cluster 2 Q D Cluster 3 D
6.5 Conclusion +0 +0 +0 +12 +12 +18 +12 +18 +24 +6 +6 +6
Fig 6.5.1 Isometric View of Cluster 1 Fig 6.5.2 Isometric View of Cluster 2 Fig 6.5.3 Isometric View of Cluster 3 Fig 6.5.4 Isometric Sections of Cluster 1/2/3

NEIGHBOURHOOD LEVEL DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

The neighbourhood level of design looks at application of blocks and cluster catalogues in global aggregations. The aim is to test the system logic in two distinct sites to understand and study the system flexibility of adapting to different specific scenarios. In the first part of this chapter, initial experiments are conducted to understand the aggregation logics. The subsequent part discusses about understanding the two distinct site conditions and outline different ambitions for the locations. The third part deals with the design process which includes aggregation, morphology modifications and introducing programmatic variation according to socio-cultural and climatic requirements.

124 125 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity 7.0 Process Review : Catalogues & Parameters 7.1 Initial Experiments 7.2 Site Analysis 7.3 Aggregation 7.4 Network Generation 7.5 Block Differentiation 7.6 Programmatic Adaptation 128 136 147 161 177 189 201 7

individual blocks

The differentiated site conditions are analysed to generate separate design ambitions for each.

This level deals with populating the selected site with cluster typologies with the aim to achieve the desired density.

Cluster Morphologies are mitigated to associate with local characteristics, site requirements and design ambition.

A recursive step to re-analyse the block level and modify certain features to relate to local social and architectural aspect.

Addition and modification of blocks to create typological and programmatic variation to suit the site context.

Neighbourhood Level Design Approach

The design stage at neighbourhood level constitutes of four major sections: aggregation, network generation, block differentiation and programmatic differentiation. In the first part of the process the aggregation of the clusters is tested for adaptability of the system to accommodate ambitions to achieve different types of density requirements and density gradients, the emergent characteristics are studied and analysed for differentiated programme adaptability.

In the subsequently stage, network patterns are analysed and consequently negotiated by block adjustments to derive network patterns befitting the design ambitions. The network patterns are referenced back to the characteristics of indigenous settings to suit the site context. The third design stage recursively looks back at the block levels and introduces site specific parameters not considered during catalogue generation. The new parameters are

negotiated with the existing ones to achieve an overall high fitness. Architectural features specific and suiting to the environmental / cultural requirements of the site are also introduced at this stage. The final stage of design investigates in detail the ability of the system to introduce programmatic and morphological variations needed at each site situation.

To proceed in the design process, the catalogues are reviewed to check the flexibility they can accommodate to suit the neighbourhood level modifications. We also review the parameters that are introduced in the design for generation of these catalogues and identify the parameters that can be added or need to be re-optimised during the neighbourhood level of design. The parameters are also checked for their ability to accommodate small modification that may occur during the process.

126 127 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
Block Catalogue Cluster Catalogue Neighbourhood Level Design
The three typologies of clusters in the cluster catalogue input into the neighbourhood level generation. The three typologies of in the block catalogue input into the Cluster level aggregation
Q Q Typology 1 Clusters Typology 1 Clusters 4 Clusters 12 Blocks 4 Clusters 12 Blocks 4 Clusters 12 Blocks Typology 2 Clusters Typology 2 Clusters BEIJING SITE Rongshu, City Core MUMBAI SITE Thane, City Outskirts Aggregation Density, Network Gradients Aggregation Density, Network Gradients Network Generation Local Street Character, Boundary conditions, Hierarchy Local Street Character, Boundary conditions, Hierarchy Network Generation Block Differentiation New Parameters, Architectural Features Site Specific Programmatic Use, Block Modification and Alternate Block Generations Site Specific Programmatic Use, Block Modification and Alternate Block Generations New Parameters, Architectural Features Block Differentiation Programmatic Variation Programmatic Variation Typology 3 Clusters Typology 3 Clusters QD QD D D

Catalogues

Block Catalogue

This segment of the chapter reviews the block level catalogues and analyses the ability of individual blocks to adapt to site - specific scenarios. 3 basic adaptations inherent in the blocks are mentioned below, others would be explored during the design process.

the block can be used directly.

By employing the catalogue morphologies, we can guarantee that certain level of qualities and characteristics are always maintained beyond the threshold value through the design process.

Modifications to be undertaken must ensure that the optimised qualities are not sacrificed. To optimise parameter of South facing surface geometry needs minimal modification. As the geometry in the block level is adapted to Mumbai conditions to reduce south facing façades, its implication is that its east and west faces are increased. Therefore to optimised for Beijing the geometry just needs to rotate by 90 degrees. The parameter of incident solar radiation is differentiated according to the geographical location of the sites. The semi-public spaces would need to relocate to

adapt to desired site conditions. Flexibility are in need in terms of relocation of semi-public spaces and simultaneous modification to block geometry to aid the optimisation process. This modification would take into account the existing quality and density attributes and ensure that these don’t get drastically affected. The relocation flexibility would also help incorporate the desired spatial aspects to suit localised cultural requirements. For example, the Mumbai blocks may require more extroverted spaces whereas Beijing may require introverted spaces that have higher enclosure value. The value can vary between 70% - 100%.

Incident Solar Radiation Mumbai Mumbai

Block Prototype Operational Flexibility for Semi-Public Spaces

MOVE Semi-Public Space by 16 m

SCALE by 1.5 times in Dimension

Beijing

The blocks in Beijing need to optimise for cold winters by generating spaces that maximise solar factors

Semi - Public Space Configuration / Enclosure

Beijing

Fig

The semi public spaces mitigate their position to suit the local requirements. In Mumbai these may deal with extroverted spaces with lower enclosure.

Beijing there is higher probability of spaces to convert into courtyard type spaces to suit local socio-cultural conditions.

128 129 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity 7.0 Process Review
Fig 7.0.1 Mumbai block requires the south facing surface to be minimum. This aspect was optimised in the catalogue process. Therefore Fig 7.0.3 The blocks in Mumbai need to react to the hot and sunny climatic condition of Mumbai. The semi - public spaces and blocks would need flexibility to generate shaded spaces. 7.0.5 Fig 7.0.4 Fig 7.0.6 In
Rotate 90o South Facing Percentage 23 % South Facing Percentage 47 % Minimise South Facing Surfaces Maximise South Facing Surfaces

Catalogues

Cluster Catalogue

This segment of the chapter reviews the cluster level catalogues and analyses the ability of these to adapt to site - specific scenarios. The clusters refer back to public spaces in each site location and explore the possibility relate the designed morphologies to these.

In order to enable morphological differentiation at neighbourhood level, local public spaces are referenced. The exercise looks into possibility of modifying morphologies to match characteristics of Chowks in Mumbai and Hutongs in Beijing. The morphology and location of these would be in relation to the network and its hierarchy.

For Example, In Mumbai a centralised pattern leading towards the Chowk with off-setted streets would be considered in detail, the location of Chowks would be preferably on secondary or tertiary routes. Contrary to Mumbai, the public spaces In Beijing would convert into linear arrangements which relate to local Hutong

spaces. The network system would be orthogonal to suit Beijing’s existing city fabrics and the Hutong-like spaces would be located on secondary or tertiary routes.

To establish control over the network system, new parameters like detouring, network density and cul-de sac proportion would be introduced. These aspects would be discussed further in the network generation chapter. As the block-block relationship, previously optimised, may get affected during the re-organisation process, a recursive step would need to be introduced that looks back at block level.

Prototype Block

Mumbai Option Centrality emphasised with radial street patterns and large central space created by block reorganisation

Beijing Option : Linearity emphasised with blocks reorganising to form orthogonal street pattern

130 131 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
7.0 Process Review
Fig 7.0.8 Linear, orthogonal and intimate small streets convert into local level informal public spaces in Beijing. Hutongs, Nan Chi Zi Fig 7.0.7 Consolidated, convex and centralised spaces act like local level public spaces in Mumbai Chowks , Ranwar Village

7.1 Initial Experiments Categorisation of Criterion

As we look into the quantified spatial parameters we realised that those parameters are to be divided into several categories and should be introduced in different stages of the design as their characteristics varies from each other.

The spatial parameters could be divided into three categories: geometrical related, geometrical & adjacent condition related and site specific ones.

The geometrical related parameters are those who will be only affected by local geometry deformation however will remain constant in value afterwards during aggregation process. Therefore for these parameters, the optimisation is a once-and-for-all process and they don not need to be re-adjusted at a later level.

The second type is related to both geometrical deformation and adjacent conditions during the aggregation. Therefore those parameters are to be taken care of at every stage.

For example, the sky view factor is a intuitive parameter that describes the openness of a space. It could be affected when the block geometry is nonuniform scaled or because of occlusion geometries adjacent to it.

132 133 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
Category 1 Geometry based Criterion Original Geometry Open Space Ratio 12.0% 10.5% 12.0% Deformed Geometry Aggregated Geometries Geometrical Related Parameters: Geometrical & Adjacent Condition Related Parameters: South Facing Surface Ratio Sky View Factor Enclosure Value Shaded Area Proportion Open Space Ratio
Block Level Cluster Level Neighbourhood Level Open Space Ratio Open Space Ratio Open Space Ratio Category 2 Geometry + Adjacent Condition based Criterion Sky View Factor (SVF) Sky View Factor (SVF) Sky View Factor (SVF) Block Level Cluster Level Neighbourhood Level Semi-public Area Total Built Area Open space ratio * Original Geometry Sky View Factor 0.74 0.61 0.59 Deformed Geometry Aggregated Geometries * Sky View Factor Visible Sky Area Projected Area Circulation length Prototype Prototype Geometry Distortion Geometry Distortion Adjacent Condition Adjacent Condition

Site Specific Criterion

The last category are those parameters which are site specific and can only be applied when site, location and the neighbouring morphology are fixed. Those parameters are to be addresses in the last design stage as they are the primary factors of the morphological differentiation.

Take incident solar radiation for example, the block geometries in Mumbai are aimed to minimise solar accessibility during the overheated period while the opposite is true for blocks in Beijing.

According to such difference in local climate, distinct target values are set respectively according to the local climatic statistics.

Site

Incident Solar Radiation

Incident Solar Radiation

Distribution of Parameters in the Process

Sky View Factor (SVF)

Open Space Ratio (OSR)

South Facing Surface Ratio

Circulation length (CL)

Solar/ Shading Property

Quality Attributes

Floor Area Ratio (FAR)

Density Attributes

The three categories of criteria come into play at different stages of generation. The analysis informs us about which kind of modification or condition would affect which parameter. The logics in the process would therefore be considerate of these aspects that vary for each parameter. The diagram above shows the distribution of parameters that has been followed in the process so far. It shows the parameters that need to be optimised at each level and also the kind of parameters that need to be considered for the neighbourhood generation.

Sky View Factor (SVF)

Enclosure Value (EV)

Connectivity

Sky View Factor (SVF)

Programmatic Distribution

Network/ Spatial Hierarchy

Floor Area Ratio (FAR)

Floor Area Ratio (FAR)

134 135 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
Cluster
Block Level
Level Neighbourhood Level
Incident Solar Radiation
Incident Solar Radiation Category 3
Block Level Cluster Level Neighbourhood Level
Prototype Geometry 102 kWh/m2 131 kWh/m2 Geometry in Beijing Geometry in Mumbai Incident Solar Radiation
Specific Parameters: Incident Solar Radiation Local Architectural Features

INITIAL EXPERIMENTS

In the experiments we aim at understanding the attributes of density and quality which may get affected during the aggregation process. These experiments are intended to shape the design logic for the neighbourhood level generation. Aggregations that vary in terms of organisation of clusters, number of clusters and typology of clusters are tested for various conditions and emergent properties.

7.1.1

136 137 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
B ottom Up Emergence Aggregation Logic Convergence Experiment I Experiment II Experiment III Differentiated Aggregation Beijing Specific Criteria Mumbai Specific Criteria Top - Down Control Architectural Ambition
7.1
Experiment I Density Variation and Emergent Spaces
Experiment II - Cluster Adjacencies in Aggregation
Experiment III - Cluster Modification for Boundary Adaptation 138 142 144
7.1.2
7.1.3

7.1.1 Experiment I Density Variation and Emergent Spaces

Experiment set up

Aim : Inputs

To calculate the highest possible density in terms of Floor Area Ratio and Population Density

Typology 2 (Equal Weightage of Quality and density), Typology 3 (Weightage on Density)

Variables :

Type, Number and Location of Clusters

Criteria :

Qualities Analysed :

Neighbourhood Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Population Density (ppl / Km2) Interstitial Void Spaces or Emergent Spaces

Interstitial Void Spaces / Emergent Spaces

The area and attributes of emergent spaces formed due to aggregation of blocks / clusters

Neighbourhood Floor Area Ratio (FAR)

Total Built Area

Plot Area

Built Area of Cluster Typology 2 : 30551 sq.m

Built Area of Cluster Typology 3 : 38739 sq.m

Population Density

Number of Residents

1 Sq.Km

Population in Cluster Typology 2 1528

Population in Cluster Typology 3 1937

Aggregation Method : Peripheral Packing

Experiment 1

The experiment adopts the peripheral packing method to generate aggregations that vary in terms of density and the kind of interstitial spaces. The experiment establishes the theoretical maximum density that the system can achieve in terms of both

Floor Area Ratio and Population Density. For experimentation typical examples of Typology 2 and Typology 3 Clusters are used for the generation as these provide the highest cluster densities. The geometrical iterations are also measured in terms of the interstitial spaces which are the by-products of the generation. The experiment analyses iterations that vary in terms of number of clusters, typology of clusters and the type of interstitial spaces. Examples for the iterations are shown in the figure.

The aggregations consistently show a maximum FAR of 1.8 which would accommodate a residential population density of up to 70,000 persons / sq.km. This density is comfortably higher than the city wide densities of Mumbai and Beijing however as the area does not include non-residential functions the density value is only theoretical. High density is seen in most of the tightly packed generations which show the higher packing efficiency and lower void spaces. The other loosely packed generations show emergence of interstitial spaces. Depending on the distribution, configuration and area of these, the spaces can be used to induce programmatic and spatial variation. This aspect is discussed further in the next topic.

138 139 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
Approx FAR Approx Density : Emergent Space Area :
Ratio Approx FAR Approx Density : Emergent Space Area :
Approx FAR Approx Density : Emergent Space Area : Footprint Ratio Approx FAR Approx Density : Emergent Space Area :
Approx FAR Approx Density : Emergent Space Area : Footprint Ratio Approx FAR Approx Density : Emergent Space Area : Footprint Ratio Approx FAR Approx Density : Emergent Space Area : Footprint Ratio Approx FAR Approx Density : Emergent Space Area : Footprint Ratio Approx FAR Approx Density Emergent Space Area Footprint Ratio Approx FAR Approx Density Emergent Space Area Footprint Ratio Approx FAR Approx Density Emergent Space Area Footprint Ratio Approx FAR Approx Density Emergent Space Area 97% 1.84 76646 ppl / sq.km. 2100 sq.m 96.7% 1.83 77067 ppl / sq.km. 3100 sq.m 97.2% 1.77 75865 ppl / sq.km. 4728 sq.m 97.8% 1.81 73730 ppl / sq.km. 7081 sq.m 91% 1.66 69148 ppl / sq.km. 5800 sq.m 90.7% 1.59 68841 ppl / sq.km. 9339 sq.m 89.9% 1.62 68520 ppl / sq.km. 12131 sq.m 87.8% 1.58 65815 ppl / sq.km. 16321 sq.m 81% 1.48 61650 ppl / sq.km. 6148 sq.m 81% 1.42 61480 ppl / sq.km. 12885 sq.m 76% 1.39 58792 ppl / sq.km. 26867 sq.m 78% 1.39 57901 ppl / sq.km. 31500 sq.m
Footprint Ratio
Footprint
Footprint Ratio
Footprint Ratio
Fig 7.1.1 Peripherial Packing Logic

7.1.1 Experiment I

Analysis of Emergent Spaces

Example of Aggregation Type 1

Example of Aggregation Type 2

Example of Aggregation Type 3

Emergent Space Analysis

Aggregation Type

Aggregation Type

3

Aggregation Type 1 Characteristics

Tight Packing with higher FAR value of 1.8

Aggregation Type 2 Characteristics

Packing with relatively lower FAR of 1.6

Aggregation Type 3 Characteristics

Area of Emergent Space to Plot Spatial Attribute of Emergent Space

Linear Space, Single Medium size space

Central Space, Single Large Size space Blocks with large usable areas like malls 1.4 20% %

Local Squares with Parks or Gardens

Experiment 1 shows emergence of interstitial spaces that vary in terms of area, distribution and configuration. The spaces generated can be assessed and divided into three categories according to their characteristics. The types of spaces form a gradient from small evenly distributed spaces to large central spaces. Each type could be adopted to serve a different programmatic function. The table shows the comparative analysis of three kinds of aggregation that generate the three kinds of spaces. The table shows the functional aspects that can be adopted in each type of space.

TYPE 1 SPACES

Spaces that are similar in size to central squares in clusters. These can accommodate local squares, small parks and gardens.

TYPE 2 SPACES :

Spaces that can accommodate single buildings or group of small blocks for entertainment or small commercial functions like shopping centres and malls.

TYPE 3 SPACES :

Large Spaces that can accommodate groups of buildings like Commercial Centres, Commercial Offices and Hotels.

Even Distribution of Emergent Spaces

Linear configuration of central Emergent Space Sizes similar to Local Squares already existing in the clusters Adds another level of hierarchy to public spaces Emergent Spaces can be used for open spaces like parks, avenues, gardens Spaces can be used for new small scale functions like household retail, parks, restaurants

Adds another level of hierarchy to public spaces

Additional functions can be plugged in as commercial, entertainment or retail blocks

The spaces can accommodate a range of functions that vary from small retail outlets to large and central business centres. Depending on the desirability of programmatic use on the site, different kinds of spaces can be emphasized in the design logic. A deliberate attempt to generate these kinds of spaces would be made, as these offer opportunities to embed programmatic differentiation within the neighbourhood fabric. This is important to the design logic as morphologies generated so far are only residential.

140 141 Neighbourhood Level Design Development
SynchroniCity
Type 1 Average FAR
Aggregation
1.8 6% Even Distribution, Small
Size
Average
Small Blocks like household retail shops 1.6 11%
Possibility of Added functions
2
Packing with FAR of 1.4
Centralised configuration of Emergent Space

7.1.2 Experiment II Cluster Adjacencies in Aggregation

Experiment set up

Aim : Parameters Not Affected by Adjacent Blocks

Inputs

Variables :

Criteria :

To calculate the effect on the parameters of quality at block level when different typologies of clusters are aggregated.

Clusters of Typology 1, 2 and 3

Location of Clusters and the typology of adjacent cluster.

Qualities not affected by Non

Uniform Scaling :

Open Space Ratio (OSR)

Enclosure Factor (EV)

South Facing Surface (FAR)

Circulation Length (CL)

Qualities affected due to location of an adjacent cluster:

Sky View Factor (SVF)

Solar Shading (SVF)

Semi-public Area Total Built Area Open space Ratio (OSR)

South facing surface area Total surface area South facing Surface ratio SFR)

Parameters Affected by Adjacent Blocks

Enclosure Factor (EV)

Facing Surface Area

Semi-public Space Area

Experiment 1 Position of Plots

The experiment is aimed at investigating cluster – cluster relationship and effects on quality attributes during aggregation. The semi-public spaces occurring on the periphery of the cluster have a high probability of getting affected when two clusters are placed adjacent to each other.

The parameters like sky-view factor and solar shading are the most affected by surrounding context. The experiment documents various permutations – combinations of adjacencies of different cluster typologies and positions of these clusters. The parameters are checked for the affected spaces and the percentage depreciation of quality is noted.

Length (CL)

Shortest route to connect the topmost semi-public space to ground Visible

Change in Average Score for SVF -0.03

Change in Average Score for Shading -0.01

Change in Score for Cluster Quality -0.1

Depreciation up to 10% is tolerable in most of the clusters of Typology 1 (Q) and Typology 2 (QD) as these have higher weighting on quality. However the same is not applicable on clusters of Typology 3 (D) which possess only threshold level quality. Also as the height of Cluster Typology 3 is more, the depreciation seen when two of these clusters are placed adjacent is 14% which is comparatively high. For the design it is therefore advisable to avoid these clusters to exist next to each other.

Change in Average Score for SVF -0.07

Change in Average Score for Shading -0.03

Change in Score for Cluster Quality -0.3

Change in Average Score for SVF -0.12

Change in Average Score for Shading -0.14

Change in Score for Cluster Quality -0.8

PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN QUALITY

of Affected Semi - Public Spaces 10

Change in Average Score for SVF : -0.03

Change in Average Score for Shading : -0.02

Change in Score for Cluster Quality : -0.1

PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN QUALITY

- 01 %

PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN QUALITY

PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN QUALITY - 01 % - 03 % - 08 %

Number of Affected Semi - Public Spaces 9

Change in Average Score for SVF : -0.09

Change in Average Score for Shading : -0.05

Change in Score for Cluster Quality : -0.5

PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN QUALITY

04 %

Number of Affected Semi - Public Spaces 15

Change in Average Score for SVF : -0.28

Change in Average Score for Shading : -0.20

Change in Score for Cluster Quality : -1.4

PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN QUALITY

14 %

142 143 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
Section a - a’ Section b - b’
of Area shaded during the day
Circulation
Sky View Factor (SVF) Proportion
Sky Area
Projected Area
Cluster Type Q - Q 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.2 1.4 1.6 Cluster Type Q - D Cluster Type QD - D Cluster Type : Q - QD Cluster Type : QD - QD Cluster
D - D Affected Semi Public
of
Semi - Public
Type :
Spaces Number
Affected
Spaces 9 Number of Affected Semi - Public Spaces 13 Number of Affected Semi - Public Spaces 15 Number
-
-

7.1.3 Experiment III

Cluster Modification for Boundary Adaptation

Experiment set up

To adapt compact aggregation approach of clusters to site specific geographic constraints.

Inputs :

cluster type 1

cluster type 2

cluster type 3

geographic boundary

Variables

Number of clusters

Location of clusters

Number of blocks to discard

Criteria :

Adaptation level to geographic constraints Density Capacity

Aim : Example of Sequential Deduction of Blocks in the aggregation process

Restricted Flexibility to Clusters which affects tight packing Flexibility induced by allowing block deductions

Position of Plots

The experiment looks into modification of clusters by deletion of blocks. This would help the clusters to adapt to restricted geometric boundaries and create tighter and more efficient aggregations. This type of modification to clusters would allow higher flexibility to clusters in site specific scenarios. The experiment deals with removing various blocks and checking the effect on the parameters. The diagram shows examples of various removed blocks, the affected parameters and the percentage change in density and quality scores.

Most of the quality attributes are not negatively affected by deletion of blocks. This is because most of the attributes are not directly

related to the number of blocks in the clusters. However the effect on the geometries that define the characteristics of clusters: the Chowk like central space and Hutong like street patterns get affected. Contrarily there is a positive rise in Sky-View factor as some of the neighbouring blocks are removed. However there is a drastic change in FAR value (density attribute) when peripheral blocks are removed, this is because these are generally the largest blocks and hold the highest density value.

Therefore, for the design process the modification allowed would be deletion of only 1 or 2 peripheral blocks which would ensure flexibility as well as not affect optimised attributes drastically.

144 145 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
Affected Parameters Affected Parameters Affected Parameters Affected Parameters Affected Parameters Affected Parameters Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Solar Shading Solar Shading Solar Shading Sky View Factor (SVF) Sky View Factor (SVF) Sky View Factor (SVF) Sky View Factor (SVF) Sky View Factor (SVF) Sky View Factor (SVF) Centralised network pattern Centralised network pattern Centralised network pattern Continuous ring streets Continuous ring streets Continuous ring streets C_Q_01 Cluster Typology 1 : Q Cluster Typology 2 : QD Cluster Typology 3 : D C_QD_01 C_D_04 Boundary Condition

7.2

SITE STUDY

The experiments are aimed at studying the attributes of density and quality which may get affected during the aggregation process. These experiments are intended to shape the design logic for the neighbourhood level generation. Aggregations that vary in terms of organisation of clusters, number of clusters and typology of clusters are tested for various conditions.

146 147 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
7.2.1 Beijing - Site Overview and Analysis 7.2.2 Mumbai - Site Overview and Analysis 7.2.3 Conclusions and Site Specific Ambitions 150 154 158

Boundary Conditions

Boundary conditions refer to geometric and geographical constraints existing around the site. These would include elements like roads, streets and water-bodies that bound the site. It is an elementary requirement of the design system to adapt to different boundary conditions and still generate a relevant design proposal. Further the system needs to show flexibility in term of reacting to boundary conditions to alter accessibility and porosity of site depending on situations.

Density Requirements

The design logic can be successful only if it can deal with multitude of density requirements. The challenge is not only to tackle extremely high density situations but also to tackle situations where density is not primary criteria where spatial quality is of significance and the system requires to generate spaces that can accommodate non-residential functions.

Environmental Factors

Selecting environmentally different sites drives the blocks to react and modify differently to each local environmental conditions. This aspect would predominantly affect the block morphology and create differentiation.

SITE CONTEXT

The design so far has dealt with generating prototypes that are suitable in terms of parameters which are common in both Mumbai and Beijing. To develop the system further the intention is to test the relevance and suitability of the system for application in site specific and differentiated conditions. The prototypes need to adapt to new locational circumstances arising during the application at a larger level, which would incorporate aggregation of cluster on two different settings. The aim is to generate differentiated architectural geometries with the same application logic.

The system would be applied to two distinct locations where the flexibility of the system to adapt to different conditions, design ambitions and site demands would be analysed and assessed. The design would deal with a neighbourhood of approximately 0.8 to 1 Sq.Km Area. The sites would be located in Mumbai and Beijing to deal with different urban scenarios and context. This level of design development would look into sites which are distinct in term of Boundary Conditions, Density Requirements, Environmental Factors and Existing Architectural Character around the site.

Existing Architectural Character

The architectural character of the surrounding spaces is one of the most significant contexts. The ability of the design system to adapt to different architectural characters in terms of existing urban fabric, incorporating the need of the location in terms of programmatic use and creating spatial order that reflects the local context would determine to a large extent the appositeness of the design.

148 149 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity

7.2.1 Site Study

Site

Indigenous Fabric

Beijing, owing to the booming Chinese economy in the recent years is undergoing rapid urban transformation and growth. The shift from the indigenous built forms to westernised / urban typologies is drastic and does not take into account the local context. The examples of these contrasting situations are seen throughout the city where the two types of built environments are always in conflict. The demographic and developmental pressure forces the indigenous character to cease and convert into multi-storey high rise forms that better suit the density requirements. To contain and reduce this phenomenon, there have been government initiatives to protect and conserve certain pockets of these

Therefore, the design experiment aims to create a synchronous between these two opposing built characters. The site is located within the urban core of the city; it presents a strong context of surroundings that represent the historical / local aspects as well as growing real estate sector. The juxtaposition provides interesting context for urban development which would need to stitch the urban divide posed by these differentiated

150 151 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
Overview Beijing
SITE Rongshu Site Location Fig 7.2.2 Juxtaposed Contexts Adjacent to the Site Fig 7.2.1 Urban Area Map of Beijing Dashilar Area 0.83 km2
Walled City (Urban Core)
Luomashi St. Caishikou St. Xuanwumen St.

7.2.1 Site Study Analysis Beijing

1 . Existing Juxtaposition of Built Fabrics

The site is surrounded by primarily two kinds of built architectural characteristics: on the western half are the recently developed high – rise high density typology of residential buildings and on the eastern side are the low-rise indigenous typologies having historical significance and are under conservation and redevelopment.

There is stark contrast in block sizes, average heights, residential density, network density and spatial aspects in both the fabrics. The embedded characteristics of indigenous settings provide higher significance to hierarchy of spaces and therefore there is prominent individuality seen in the architecture of their semipublic and public spaces that exists as Courtyards and Hutongs respectively.

In contrast the urbanised residential parts are devoid of local characteristics and are designed with singular viewpoint of providing higher floor space for the increasing density. As a repercussion the buildings are bigger, higher and don’t respond to human scale and proportion, the difference in scale greatly affects streetscapes and the activities taking place in them.

Table on the left shows the comparative analysis of the two situations existing around the site.

2 . Urban Demographic Demands

The growing economy of China has resulted in multi-fold escalation of urbanisation. This has resulted in higher urban population and as a result higher demands for floor spaces for residences and businesses. This aspect is prominent in the walled city of Beijing where the density, on an average is about 29000 persons / sq.km and is projected to increase to 42000 persons / sq.km. To sustain and accommodate this increase in population new opportunities to generate more usable floor space needs to be explored. As the site is located in the urban core demographic and developmental pressure would be high and in this respect high quality - high density residential typologies need to be explored.

3 . Environmental Aspects

Beijing has a rather dry, monsoon-influenced humid continental climate characterized by hot, humid summers, and extremely cold, windy, dry winters. It is during this time that the minimum temperature falls below 0 degree Celsius. During this time the outdoor daily activities get restricted. The design would therefore need to target this time period so the semipublic spaces have a year round functionality.

Fig 7.2.5 Demographical Pressure in Beijing

The contrasting patterns in the two sites pose a design challenge where the intevention would have to take into account characteristic of both sites as an influence for the design.

4 Programmatic aspects

The site surrounding has two contrasting characters even in terms of programmatic use. On the Rongshu side is a residential area but on the Dashilar side is mixed use setting having residential, commercial, and retail based programmes. The chief among them are the home based small scale industry units that attract a lot of tourism. These units focus on handicrafts and other household goods. The distribution of these units ensures constant pedestrian activity in the area keeping the area activated. This aspect will influence the programmes in the site.

Numeric

Data adapted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beijing under topic of Government, Politic and Growth and from http://www.bjinvest.gov.cn/english/gn/ under topic of Beijing Real Estate Development,Investment Forum

152 153 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
The Dashilar Area is under government preservation to protect the last remainders of indigenous spatial aspects. The Rongshu Location is dominated by Residential High Rise Typology common to new development in Beijing URBAN FABRIC RONGSHU Average Building / Block Sizes There is significant difference in the sizes of building in the two condition. The urban block areas generally with large foot prints and segregated. In contrast the blocks in indigenous settings are small and intimately placed. Height Variation : High rise typologies are the norm for any new development so the urban fabric is dominated by theses in contrast to the other fabric. Plot Sizes The plot sizes reflect the block sizes of respective types however in Urban Fabric 1 to 4 buildings occupy the plot whereas in the indigenous one 20 -30 smaller blocks occupy the same plot
15,000 M 24 to 72 M 3 to 12 M 30 x 30 M to 80 x 80 M 3 12 72 24 5,000 M 6 X 6 M to 25 X 25 M SITE INDIGENOUS FABRIC DASHILAR
Fabric Type Urban fabric is dominated by wide roads with lower network density whereas the indigenous fabric defined by small streets with higher network density.
Population Density Increase in Usable Built Space in Walled City 0 5k 10k 15k 20k 25k 30k 35k 35k Beijing 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Population Density per km Built Area in sq.m Walled City Projected For Walled City (2025) 0 10k 10k 40k 70k 5k 1300 29550 42000 20k 20k 50k 80k 25k 30k 30k 60k 90k 35k 40k 45k 15k
Annual Temperature Variation 6 13 21 27 31 32 31 26 20 10 4 -9 -5 8 14 19 22 21 15 7 -1 -6 Average High Temp (°c) Average Low Temp (°c) January February March April May June July August September October November December - 20 - 10 0 10 20 30 40
Fig 7.2.3 Highrise Residential Typologies Fig 7.2.4 Traditional Courtyard Residential Typologies Fig 7.2.6 Annual Temperature in Beijing Fig 7.2.7 Local Shop for Daily Items Fig 7.2.8 Handicraftsman in Beijing

7.2.2 Site Study Overview

Percentage Population Dependent for occupation on Mumbai

37%

63%

A large portion of the population is employed in Mumbai City

Thane,

Proportion of Thane Population having economic dependence on Mumbai

Population of Thane 1.8 Million Persons commuting daily form Thane to Mumbai : 1.1 Million

The site selected for Mumbai is located in Thane suburb on the outskirts of the city. Thane is one of the main suburbs which came into existence as ‘Bedroom Economies’ that had a symbiotic relationship with the main city of Mumbai. These suburbs developed due to the rising real estate and living costs within the main urban core. They provided alternate and cheaper residential options located close the city. Majority of the population travels to and fro from the main city on a daily basis for their livelihood. Therefore the urban scenario in these locations shows programmatic homogeneity of mid-rise residential typology.

Due to the increased demographic pressure on the main city, government has taken initiatives to develop these peripheral suburbs, to reduce pressure on the city infrastructure. Thane, represents one such suburb where there has been a radical growth in the population. The Design would be tested in a site in Thane to respond to the context and generate not only typological but also programmatic variation in the chosen location.

154 155 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
Fig 7.2.11 Dependence on Urban Core Daily Commuters to Mumbai City Fig 7.2.10 Homogeneous Urban Scenario
Mumbai
Mumbai Island City of Mumbai Thane (urban core) Site Island City (Urban Core) Fig 7.2.9 Urban Area Map of Mumbai

7.2.2 Site Study Analysis

2 . Urban Demographic Demands

Thane shows an urban scenario that is dominated by mid-rise, low income group housing with very limited variation in occupational programmes. This location developed due to rising real estate and living costs within the main city. It provided alternate and cheaper residential options located in close proximity to the city. High percentage of the population depends of the Mumbai city and approximately 1million people travels to and from Mumbai on daily basis for their livelihood. This has led to development of only residential units which has resulted in an urban fabric that shows programmatic and typological homogeneity.

Government incentives and rising real estate cost in the main city have led to a phenomenal rise in the population of Thane. The growth rate in Thane is 35.2 which is approximately 9 times that of the Mumbai City and twice that of national average.

The city faces a shift in programmatic use as more and more businesses are moving into the fringe cities, closer to the working population and reduce the dependence and infrastructural pressure on the main city. The projected average density is said to increase to equal that of Mumbai in the next 20 years.

The design would not only need to consider the rise in demands for residential floor spaces but also the demands to accommodate varied programmes.

3 . Environmental Aspects

The Climate of Mumbai is a tropical wet and dry climate. Mumbai’s climate can be best described as moderately hot with high level of humidity. Its coastal nature and tropical location ensures temperatures won’t fluctuate much throughout the year, the mean average of 27.2 °C. The mean average temperatures in about 36 °C in summer, while the mean average temperature during winter is 20.5 °C. This ensures comfortable winters however the hot summers affect any outdoor activity. The indigenous settings show consideration for this aspect something which is not common in recent developments. The design would need to reference the indigenous settings for their adaptability to climatic aspects.

Numeric Data adapted from http://www.census2011.co.in/census/district/355-thane. html and http://www.census2011.co.in/census/metropolitan/305-mumbai.html under

The site is strategically located at a junction of two roads leading into the city. This holds significance as this makes the site easily accessible. This would further help in introducing programmatically different function in the site which can be accessed by a large number of resident populations. This would be important consideration for developing this site, as this would not only create variation in terms of programmes but also decrease the dependence on the urban core of Mumbai. The site to hold significance in the location and to react to the homogeneous context would need to create differentiation and in the process generate opportunities for the residents to get employed in the same location and thereby reduce commuting.

4 Programmatic aspects

The city has seen radical growth of BPO (Business Process Outsourcing) sector. This sector is independent of any site dependences and therefore can be placed anywhere, where skilled work force is available. The government has encouraged growth of this sector as it can provide large scale employment to the local population. The corporate feature of this sector ensures low pressure on infrastructure as compared to any other industrial setup. This is new developing trend of the city and therefore would be an important consideration for creating programmatic variation in the site.

156 157 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
1 . Homogeneous Programmatic Use
Main Roads National Highway 3 StateHighway35 Population Growth between 2001 to 2011 Density Comparison National Average Percentage Population Growth Pop. Density / km Mumbai 0 0 10 10k 5k 20 20k 25k 15k 30 40 Mumbai Thane THANE P rojected Density 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 5k 10k 15k 20k 25k 30k 17.6% 35.2% 24380 15900 25000 4.3% Housing Offices Retail Institutional Industrial Open Space Parks Housing Offices Retail Institutional Industrial Open Spaces Parks Open Space 0.8 Sq.M / Person Housing for Medium and High Income Groups The site is in proximity to two main roads leading into the city. Affordable housing 71.0% 10.3% 4.0% 5.7% 2.4% 3.1% 3.5% 78 % 19% 03% Land-use Pattern in Thane City Existing Constraints
Mumbai
Average High Temp (°c) Average Low Temp (°c) January February March April May June July August September October November December 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0 3 5 24 25 28 31 36 34 33 32 32 29 26 25 17 18 21 24 27 2626 2525 24 21 18 Annual Temperature Variation
Fig 7.2.12 Homogeneous Residential Typologies Fig 7.2.13 Demographical Pressure in Mumbai
Fig 7.2.16 Modernised Working Space Fig 7.2.15 Local
for
Supply
Fig 7.2.14 Annual Temperature in Mumbai
Shop
Pottery
the topics of National Growth Rate

7.2.3 Site Study

Conclusions and Site Specific Ambitions

Beijing

Integrating the Contrasting Fabrics

The site in Beijing is set in a juxtaposition of contrasting indigenous and urban fabric. There is stark contrast in block sizes, average heights, residential density, network density and spatial aspects. The urbanised part holds high-rise high density residential typologies and the indigenous settings are under preservation.

The chief ambition for the Beijing site is to create a gradient configuration that would integrate the contrasting contexts. This would be established by creating a smooth transition of network, density and built forms. The site would need to incorporate aspects of both fabrics to generate a seamless transition. The network system would need to connect to the existing streets and roads. Network and Density gradients would be the primary aspects considered during the generation.

The site in Mumbai shows a programmatic homogeneity of residential which depends on the daily commuting with Mumbai city. The Chief aim for this site would be to create a design which would be differentiated from the homogeneous residential typologies.

The ambition would be to create a centralised pattern that would link the periphery to the site centre. And at the centre the proposal would be to create a programmatically different use in the form of commercial or business centre. This would be embodied in an imposing building created by using tools of the same system. The site would be generated with a density gradient that relates the surrounds to the site. Network would be leading to the central core with increasing network density towards it to ensure maximum accessibility.

Generating fabric that optimises connectivity

Target Density : 50,000 persons/ sq.km

Target Floor Area Ratio : 2.0

Number of Clusters 26 - 28

Predominantly residential programmes with household retail

As the site is located in the urban core the target residential density would need to correspond to the projected value of the location. The density, the system would try to achieve is 50,000 persons / sq.km. This would ensure that the proposal is at par with the new developments in the city. Therefore the corresponding FAR to achieve this density is 1.8. The possibility to achieve this value has been established in the initial experiments. The aggregation would require 28-30 clusters. To ensure variation in morphology the system would try to use equal number of each typology.

The site would target a residential density of 30,000 persons/ sq.km. This is marginally higher than the projected density for the area. In this site quality attributes would be weighed higher as the pressure on density attributes are lower than that of Beijing. The target FAR for residential development would be around 1.2. This value for the site will increase when new programmes would be added. The development is aimed to be mixed use development with higher weightage on differentiated programs that would not only generate employment for 70% of the residing population to decrease pressure on commuting but also add morphological variation.

Target Density 30,000 persons/ sq.km

50,000 30,000

Target Floor Area Ratio : 1.5

Number of Clusters : 21 - 23

Mixed Use Development with high percentage of commercial functions

Occupational Opportunity for 70% of the population

Responses

Optimise aspects like Incident Solar Radiation on Open Spaces

Maximise South Facing Surfaces

The system would recursively look into block levels to enforce environmental compatibility. Parameters like Incident Solar Radiation and South Facing surfaces would be used to enable block modification in relation with the already optimised parameters. For Beijing the criteria would be to create comfortable environmental condition during the harsh winter season. Therefore the modification would tend to maximise solar access.

The blocks for Mumbai, like Beijing, would recursively optimise environmental parameters of incident solar radiation. Due to the hot climatic conditions the aim would be to create comfortable conditions during the overheated period of the summer. Therefore the modifications of the block would look into decreasing solar access. The blocks during the aggregation would modify to optimise south facing surfaces which in the case of Mumbai need to be minimised.

Optimise aspects like Incident Solar Radiation on Open Spaces

Minimise South Facing Surfaces

158 159 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 500.0 1000.0 1500.0 2500.0 3000.0 3500.0 4000.0 4500.0 5000.0 5500.0 kWh/m
Mumbai
Density and Programmatic Use Density and
Environmental Responses Environmental
Programmatic Use
FABRIC SITE INDIGENOUS FABRIC
URBAN
persons / sq.km persons / sq.km Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0 2000.0 2500.0 3000.0 3500.0 4000.0 4500.0 5000.0 5500.0 kWh/m

7.3

AGGREGATION

This level deals with applying clusters into the constraints posed by site specific neighbourhoods. Aggregation method uses peripheral packing algorithm to generate various iterations for each site by taking into consideration density requirements, density gradients and emergent spaces. The intelligence of the system is derived from logics developed from the experiments as well as site specific experiments that would be conducted in the following chapter. The iterations would be evaluated and the desired options would be selected for further working.

160 161 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
Experiment IV Cluster Organisation 7.3.2 Mumbai Aggregation 7.3.3 Beijing Aggregation 162 164 170
7.3.1

7.3.1 Aggregation Experiment

Cluster Organisation

Experiment set up

Aim :

To produce a centralised network / gradient pattern by different aggregation of cluster typologies responding to the site requirements.

Inputs

Clusters of Typology 1, 2 and 3

Variables :

Position and typology of Clusters.

Criteria :

Connectivity Analysis showing the desired patterns in terms of higher connectivity in the centre in the Mumbai Experiments and a gradient from high to low network density in Beijing from east to west

Experiment IV Cluster Organisation

The experiment investigates organisational logics of different typologies of clusters to generate the desired network patterns. The experiment takes into account not only the peripheral streets formed around the blocks but also the informal paths formed within them. As the cluster typologies constitute the same number of blocks, the number of peripheral streets formed is roughly the same. However, as the Quality preferred clusters accommodate blocks with lower densities that have higher informal pathways at ground level the overall connectivity of these clusters is higher than that of Density preferred clusters.

Different network patterns are desired from each of the site. For

Mumbai site the aim is to generate a centralised pattern with higher network density for the central core. For Beijing a linear gradation is expected where the network patterns relate to the neighbouring context.

CONCLUSION From experiments that evaluate different arrangements with connectivity ratios, we conclude that for Mumbai the well-connected Q clusters should be in the centre while the less-fragmental on the periphery. For Beijing the optimum arrangement is found to be linear gradation from D to Q from West to East.

162 163 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
MUMBAI BEIJING
C_Q_02 C_QD_01 C_D_04
25 20 15 10 5 0 Informal Paths Informal Paths Number of Streets Formal Streets Formal Streets Total Q Q Typology 1 Clusters 12 11 11 11 23 18 07 16 05 Typology 2 Clusters Typology 3 Clusters QD QD D D Comparative Graph of Number of Streets Comparative Graph of Number of Streets Q - D pattern Random pattern D - Q pattern D - Q pattern Connectivity Value 21 18 15 12 9 6 3 0 Connectivity Value 21 18 15 12 9 6 3 0 Connectivity Value 21 18 15 12 9 6 0 Connectivity Value 21 18 15 12 9 6 0 42 36 30 24 18 12 6 0 42 36 30 24 18 12 6 0 42 36 30 24 18 12 6 0 42 36 30 24 18 12 6 0 Connectivity Value Connectivity Value Connectivity Value Connectivity Value Q Q D Q Q QD QD QD QD QD D D D Q D
Fig 7.3.1 Network Comparison of Q/QD/D Clusters Fig 7.3.2 Decentralised Network Pattern Fig 7.3.4 Random Network Pattern Fig 7.3.3 Centralised Network Pattern Fig 7.3.5 Network Pattern featured with linear Gradient

7.3.2 Aggregation : Mumbai Generation Criteria

Experiment II informs this criteria where the generation will avoid adjacent placement of clusters of typology 3 (D)

The aggregation process aims at using the different the site boundaries as constraint and cluster catalogue as inputs. The arrangement of these clusters within the site is informed by 3 factors, the design ambition, the logics derived from initial experiments and the logics derived from site specific experiments. These aspects are common for Mumbai and Beijing.

Experiment IV informs this criteria where Typology Q are placed near the centre to generate a centralised pattern.

The criteria for generation in Mumbai is based on aspects like packing efficiency which is the ratio of Cluster Footprints to Total Site area, minimum neighbourhood FAR (Floor Area Ratio) of 1.2 which would accommodate a minimum residential density of 30,000 persons / sq.km, density gradient that relates to the surrounding context of mid- rise houses and a centralised network

A density gradient that relates the surrounding areas to the site. Having the highest density in the centre

pattern that provides higher connectivity to the central core which to suit the ambition would serve as an attractor for the masses. As a higher quality score is desired the weightage for adjacent cluster condition (Experiment II) is set higher as this would guarantee that number of adjacent D blocks in minimum. This would however affect the overall density capacity but help the overall quality

According to ambitions for the site a residential density of 30,000 persons / sq.km is desired with total FAR of 1.5

A centralised pattern with a central space that allows adding new programmes to the site.

score. The aim is to generate a number of iterations by using the peripheral packing algorithm and select the fittest individuals for evaluation and further working.

164 165 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
INPUTS Boundary Conditions Clusters Experiments Plot Area : 21253 sq.m Avg. Population 1280 persons Avg. FAR 1.20 Total Area 790000 sq.m (0.79 sq.km) Boundaries: 2 Main Roads and Waterfront Plot Area 19401 sq.m Avg. Population 1937 persons Avg. FAR Plot Area : 20148 sq.m Avg. Population 1528 persons Avg. FAR : 1.52
Q Typology Clusters Adjacent Cluster Condition Mumbai Site Typology 2 Clusters Typology 3 Clusters Cluster Organisation QD D
CRITERIA Packing Efficiency Density Gradient Centralised Pattern FAR & Density 30,000 1.5 persons / sq.km Floor Area Ratio Total Cluster Footprint Area Total Site Area

7.3.2 Aggregation : Mumbai Generation Process

Analysis Chart

With the discussed criteria a number of iterations are generated using peripheral packing algorithm. We realised that to achieve the desired density the entire site does not need to be fully occupied. Emergent void spaces made up sizable portion of the land use. This aspect works in favour of the ambition as the interstitial spaces could be used to introduce new programmatic functions. The criteria to check the existence of a central emergent space also works in tandem with the design objective to create programmatically different central core.

We also checked the proportion of the different typologies used within the site, to ensure variation in morphology; attempt was to use equal number of clusters from each typology.

The iterations are tabulated and scored. The score represents the summation of numeric data acquired for each criterion. 3 fittest individuals are selected to be evaluated for their size, distribution and configuration of emergent spaces.

166 167 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity Packing Efficiency Population ppl / sq.km FAR Total Clusters Cluster Adjacency (Score) Void Area (Sq.M) Central Space M_G_01 0.50 27881 1.58 21 0.7 432123 M_G_02 0.52 29154 1.57 22 1 411975M_G_03 0.50 26579 1.49 21 0.8 427314 M_G_04 0.50 26507 1.48 21 0.8 425851M_G_05 0.52 29154 1.57 22 0.8 411975 M_G_06 0.49 28976 1.65 21 0.2 435827 M_G_07 0.52 28947 1.56 22 1 410870M_G_08 0.52 29082 1.56 22 0.6 410512 M_G_09 0.49 28088 1.59 21 0.8 433228M_G_10 0.52 29154 1.57 22 0.8 411975 M_G_11 0.47 26060 1.54 20 0.9 450419 M_G_12 0.52 29154 1.57 22 1 411975M_G_02 Presence of a central space Best 3 iterations are selected for the next stage Q Typology 1 Clusters 4 Clusters 4 Clusters 12 Fittest Aggregations 4 Clusters Typology 2 Clusters Typology 3 Clusters QD Cluster Catalogue Design Input Generation Criteria Generation Boundary Conditions Mumbai Site (Thane) Packing Efficiency Experiment 1 Adjacent Cluster Logic Population Density / FAR / Number of Clusters Experiment 2 Cluster Organisation Centralised Pattern / Central Emergent Space D M_G_01 M_G_05 M_G_09 M_G_02 M_G_06 M_G_10 M_G_03 M_G_07 M_G_07 M_G_11 M_G_04 M_G_08 M_G_12 M_G_12
Selected Iterations
Evaluation
M_G_xx Unsatisfactory Values

7.3.2 Aggregation : Mumbai Evaluation

EVALUATION CRITERIA

EVALUATION 1

EVALUATION 2

EVALUATION 3

Distribution of different types of emergent spaces

Consolidated and Large Central Space (larger than 30000 Sq.M) to accomodate groups of buildings for commercial programmes like offices

Evenly distributed Medium size spaces (5000 - 30000 Sq.M) to accommodate entertainment and smaller commercial functions like malls and shopping centres

Minimum number of emergent spaces smaller than 5000 Sq.M.

SELECTED ITERATIONS FOR MUMBAI SITE

Total Clusters Accommodated

No. of Clusters of Typology (Q)

No. of Clusters of Typology 2 (QD)

No. of Clusters of Typology 3 (D)

Neighbourhood FAR generated Area of Emergent Spaces

Total Clusters Accommodated :

No. of Clusters of Typology 1 (Q) :

No. of Clusters of Typology 2 (QD) :

No. of Clusters of Typology 3 (D) :

Neighbourhood FAR generated :

Area of Emergent Spaces :

The selected aggregations for Mumbai are evaluated for the feasibility of emergent spaces to accommodate new functions. The primary evaluation criterion is based on the central space. This space needs to be consolidated, convex and large ie. greater than 30000 Sq.M as this would need to house a group of buildings with larger floor spaces that would serve for a business centre. Therefore it is imperative that the space is a whole consolidated mass and not broken into branches which may limit the possibility of introducing new built forms.

Total Clusters Accommodated

No. of Clusters of Typology 1 (Q)

No. of Clusters of Typology 2 (QD)

No. of Clusters of Typology 3 (D)

FAR generated

The medium size emergent spaces (5000-30000 Sq.M) should be evenly distributed through the site as these would accommodate smaller functions like malls, shopping centres, theatres, schools etc. The aggregation are also evaluated for having minimum number of emergent spaces less than 5000 Sq.M as this level of open spaces are already existing as public spaces in clusters.

On this basis Aggregation M_G_12 is selected for further working for Mumbai Site.

The option selected for the Mumbai site generated a residential FAR of 1.57 .The FAR value would significantly increase when the new programmes would be added to the emergent spaces. The aggregation obtained as the result still appears fragmented into divisible clusters. This aspect would need to be addressed at the next level of generation. Most of the criteria aimed for in this stage of generation in terms of packing, cluster organisation and density were accomplished and the emergent aspects provide opportunity to further our design ambitions.

168 169 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
Neighbourhood
Area of Emergent Spaces 22 6 9 7 1.57 214,658 22 7 8 7 1.56 215,137 22 6 9 7 1.57 215,287
Q Q Q Q Q Q D D D D D D D QD QD QD QD QD QD QD QD QD Total Clusters Accommodated No. of Clusters of Typology (Q) No. of Clusters of Typology 2 (QD) No. of Clusters of Typology 3 (D) Neighbourhood FAR generated Population Supported Built up Area Area of Emergent Spaces Additional Area for Large Commercial Functions: Additional Area for Entertainment and Small Commercial functions: 22 6 9 7 1.57 29,154 ppl/sq.km 699,696 Sq.M 215,287 Sq.M 70,217 Sq.M 21,795 Sq.M 17,079 sq.m. 6851 sq.m. 8,982 sq.m. 7849 sq.m. 3162 sq.m. 13,946 sq.m. 6274 sq.m. 70217 sq.m. 8,112 sq.m. 3053 sq.m. 5021 sq.m. 4702 sq.m. 9076 sq.m. 8084 sq.m. 7207 sq.m. 5546 sq.m. 12,411 sq.m. 14,033 sq.m.
M_G_02 M_G_07 M_G_12
Selected Aggregation
Fig 7.3.6 Neighbourhood Aggregation Pattern in Mumbai

7.3.3 Aggregation : Beijing Generation Criteria

A similar process for generation is followed for Beijing where Clusters and Boundary Conditions would be part of the inputs and the generation would be guided by logics and criteria of the developed in the experiments. The generation in Beijing is expected to a achieve the maximum possible density. The process is approximately looking at an FAR of 2.1 to 2.5 which would

accommodate a population density of around 60,000 persons / sq.km. This would appease the demographic pressure the urban scenario faces. To achieve this, a higher number of Densitypreferred clusters would be used. The generation logic also reduces the weightage on Adjacent Cluster Conditions so as accommodate higher density which is the primary criteria for aggregation on

A density gradient that relates the surrounding areas to the site. Highest density towards west decreasing toward East

this site. Apart from factors of packing efficiency the criteria for generation also looks at creating a density and network gradient ascending from east to west to match the context by appropriate cluster arrangements. Similar to the process applied for Mumbai, a number of iterations would be generated.

Gradation of fabric in terms of Network from East to West

170 171 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
Area
Boundaries:
Main Roads Beijing Site CRITERIA Packing Efficiency Adjacent Cluster Condition Gradient Pattern FAR & Density 50,000 2.0 persons / sq.km Floor Area Ratio Total Cluster Footprint Area Total Site Area According to amibitions for the site a residential density of 50,000 persons / sq.km is desired with total FAR of 2.0
Total
830000 sq.m (0.83 sq.km)
3
INPUTS Boundary Conditions Clusters Experiments Plot Area : 21253 sq.m Avg. Population 1280 persons Avg. FAR 1.20 Plot Area 19401 sq.m Avg. Population 1937 persons Avg. FAR Plot Area : 20148 sq.m Avg. Population 1528 persons Avg. FAR : 1.52
Experiment II informs this criteria where the generation will avoid adjacent placement of clusters of typology 3 (D)
Q Typology Clusters Adjacent Cluster Condition Typology 2 Clusters Typology 3 Clusters Cluster Organisation QD D
Experiment IV informs this criteria where Typology Q are placed on the east side and Typology on the opposite side

7.3.3 Aggregation : Beijing Generation Process

Analysis Chart B_G_xx

Best 3 iterations are selected for the next stage

Unsatisfactory Values

The iterations formed closely packed aggregations that were able to achieve FAR of up to 1.95. The percentage of Density preferred blocks was understandably higher and the interstitial spaces were visibly lower. To achieve higher packing efficiency the density clusters on certain instances strayed from the desired cluster organisation patterns. A scoring system similar to the Mumbai option was applied where the aggregations and their attributes were tabulated and scored and 3 fittest individuals are selected for the evaluation process.

172 173 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity Packing Efficiency Population ppl / sq.km FAR Total Clusters Cluster Adjacency (Score) Void Area (Sq.M) B_G_01 0.64 43194 2.03 27 0.9 304992 B_G_02 0.64 43603 1.96 27 0.6 305739 B_G_03 0.64 42375 1.97 27 0.9 303498 B_G_04 0.64 43194 2.01 27 0.8 304992 B_G_05 0.63 43689 1.95 27 0.8 307202 B_G_06 0.64 42375 2.01 27 0.8 303498 B_G_07 0.61 42323 1.90 26 0.6 326992 B_G_08 0.61 42323 1.90 26 0.8 326992 B_G_09 0.60 44064 1.92 28 0.9 282992 B_G_10 0.64 43194 1.94 27 0.8 304992 B_G_11 0.64 43194 2.13 27 0.8 309992 B_G_12 0.63 43441 1.97 27 0.8 300097 Selected Iterations Q Typology 1 Clusters 4 Clusters 4 Clusters 12 Fittest Aggregations 4 Clusters Typology 2 Clusters Typology 3 Clusters QD Cluster Catalogue Design Input Generation Criteria Generation Boundary Conditions Beijing Site (Dashilar) Packing Efficiency Experiment 1 Adjacent Cluster Logic Population Density / FAR / Number of Clusters Experiment 2 Cluster Organisation Density / Network Gradient D B_G_01 B_G_05 B_G_05 B_G_09 B_G_02 B_G_06 B_G_10 B_G_03 B_G_07 B_G_11 B_G_11 B_G_04 B_G_08 B_G_12 B_G_12
Evaluation

7.3.3 Aggregation : Beijing Evaluation

EVALUATION CRITERIA

EVALUATION 1

EVALUATION 2

EVALUATION 3

Distribution of different types of emergent spaces

Minimum Void or Emergent Spaces in the Site

Void spaces located on the periphery to be used as public green pockets spaces.

Larger emergent spaces located near the indigenous setting so as to have higher porosity on that side

SELECTED ITERATIONS FOR BEIJING SITE

Selected Aggregation

Total Clusters Accommodated

No. of Clusters of Typology 1 (Q)

No. of Clusters of Typology 2 (QD)

No. of Clusters of Typology 3 (D)

Neighbourhood FAR generated

Total Clusters Accommodated No. of Clusters of Typology 1 (Q) No. of Clusters of Typology 2 (QD) No. of Clusters of Typology 3 (D) Neighbourhood FAR generated

Total Clusters Accommodated :

of Clusters of Typology 1 (Q) :

of Clusters of Typology 2 (QD) :

Clusters of Typology 3 (D) :

The selected aggregations for Beijing are evaluated for the minimum percentage of emergent spaces as this would ensure higher built up area. Avoiding emergent spaces all together in the aggregation was not possible due to predefined cluster geometries. However these spaces could be used for alternate functions. As the morphology in Beijing is extremely dense due to higher density goals these emergent void spaces could be used for public open spaces like pocket parks, gardens, markets or small exhibition areas for home based industries existing in the neighbouring site.

The configurations of these spaces that would be best suited for this site would be linear, as these can be converted into avenue like spaces similar to Hutongs and become part of the network. Therefore, this is another criteria for selection. In terms of distribution, majority of the emergent spaces should be located near the indigenous setting to match the fabric in terms of porosity.

On these basis B_G_12 iteration is selected for further working.

The option selected for Beijing site visually shows higher porosity on the Eastern site and a considerably higher density on the western side. This was one of the objectives of the aggregation process. The western side also shows tightly packed aggregation making the clusters continuous and less distinguishable as compared to Mumbai aggregation. The aggregation achieves an overall FAR of 1.97 which is on the lower side of the target value, however this was expected as the eastern side of the site required to be much lower in terms of density to match the indigenous settings.

Total Clusters Accommodated

No. of Clusters of Typology 1 (Q)

No. of Clusters of Typology 2 (QD) No. of Clusters of Typology 3 (D)

Neighbourhood FAR generated

Population Supported Built up Area Area of Emergent Spaces

174 175 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
Area
of Emergent Spaces
Area
of Emergent Spaces
No.
No.
Neighbourhood FAR generated : Area of Emergent Spaces : 27 5 13 9 1.95 307202 27 7 11 9 2.13 309992 27 6 12 9 1.97 300097
No.
of
Q D D D D QD QD QD Q Q QD Q QD QD QD Q D Q QD QD D D D QD QD D Q 2173 sq.m. 1359 sq.m. 5389 sq.m. 5389 sq.m. 4278 sq.m. 4278 sq.m. 909 sq.m. 458 sq.m. 2091 sq.m. 907 sq.m. 436 sq.m. 6851 sq.m.
B_G_05 B_G_11 B_G_12
27 6 12 9 1.97 43441 ppl/sq.km 868827 Sq.M 300097 Sq.M
Fig 7.3.7 Neighbourhood Aggregation Pattern in Beijing

GENERATION 7.4

This stage of design development investigates logic of network generation that would relate to the existing context. The logic therefore approaches the subject at two levels: at an overall level the network pattern aims to create a fabric that integrates the site with the surroundings and at a local level the logic refers back to features that define networks in local indigenous settings. The block organisation is negotiated within limits to accomplish these goals.

176 177 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
7.4.1 Network Generation Principal Criteria 7.4.2 Network Generation Mumbai 7.4.3 Network Generation Beijing 178 180 184
NETWORK

7.4.1 Network Generation Criteria

Principal Aspects

Network Criteria The network generation is based on 4 basic aspects. These would be common for both the sites and would define the general properties and principles for the process.

Hybrid System

For the network generation a hybrid method, which is combination of top-down imposed system and an emergent network system (Fig 7.4.1), is followed. This method allows incorporating architectural ambitions within an otherwise bottom up approach; secondly, it avoids randomness and inefficiency existing in a completely emergent method. The system provides better control of emergent spaces and still maintain characteristic and properties of morphologies defined in the process.

Organisational Flexibility to Blocks

To incorporate the design ambitions block organisation would need to be negotiated. To minimise distortion to the clusters, limitations are set on the extent to which a block is allowed to shift. The limit is set according to the location of the block with in the cluster. The peripheral blocks are allowed to move only within 30 M radius as this ensures the density values are not affected and to some extent cluster morphology is preserved. The inner blocks are allowed to move up to 60 M as this ensures higher flexibility for smaller blocks to help create tighter packing as well as provide flexibility to change the morphology of the central space.

Fig 7.4.1 A Hybrid System Between Imposed and Emergent Networks

Access Routes integrated with Buildings

The network system would be regarded as an analogue system of woolly path experiment to generate a highly connected, effective and minimum spanning system. This would ensure that the network length is minimized without compromising connectivity (Fig 7.4.2). The system would also try to establish a defined hierarchical order for the network system, this would be defined by the connectivity values found on each segment of the network which would in turn define the widths of these routes.

The network system attempts to break away from conventional network sub-division that divides the fabric into plots with segregated built form. The logic attempts to use the emergent paths within the built forms as part of the main network for better integration.

178 179 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
Minimum Spanning and Hierarchical Block Re-Organisation
Top Down Imposed Network Hybrid Network Bottom Up Emergent Network Fig 7.4.3 Displacement Ranges for Small/ Medium Blocks Fig 7.4.4 Informal Pass-way that Across the Building Morphology Fig 7.4.2 Before/ After Network Self-Organisation

Site Specific Criteria

The aim for the network generation in Mumbai is to create a centralised pattern that extends from the existing fabric around the site to the central core within the site. This is proposed so as to create better connectivity for the programmatically different core and increase porosity to the central business district. The primary routes would connect the site periphery to the centre and the secondary paths emerge from these main routes. Another criterion that governs the network pattern is that it follows

the characteristics of existing indigenous patterns. The network in Mumbai would follow branching patterns to accommodate the local level public squares on secondary paths to create visual segregation for these spaces.

To bring in the properties of featured cul-de sacs and offset paths, which create intimate gathering spaces, we device a logic to control network density, segment detour and cul-de-sac proportions. Network density indicates the road length per square kilometre

length required to cover a certain distance, and therefore higher the road length higher is the detouring. Cul-de-sac proportions indicate the proportion of discontinuous routes. Both these aspects hold higher numeric values in the case of Mumbai and therefore would be the target for the design. Fig 7.4.7 shows the modifications occurring in the clusters.

Network Density

Segment Detour : (Total length / distance)

Cule-de-Sac Proportions :

180 181 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity 7.4.2
Network Generation : Mumbai Fig 7.4.5 Proposed Centralised Network Pattern in Mumbai Fig 7.4.6 Configuration of Public Space in Mumbai Fig 7.4.7 Proposed Aggregation Pattern in Mumbai Site Network Concept Diagrams Primary Routes leaded to the centre Branched layout of network ending in Cul-de- sacs Public Spaces located on secondary / tertiary branches 171km / 100sq.km 1.47 8/10

7.4.2

The block reorganisation takes into account the generic aspects as well as those specific to Mumbai. To aid the process connectivity analysis is carried out in the aggregated geometry. The possible route systems are analysed on these patterns using the logics mentioned above. The blocks are consequently rearranged to derive a simplified and minimalistic version of the network system which encompasses the properties mentioned as the design

ambition. The primary routes form a direct connectivity to the existing road systems and lead into the central core. The local level public spaces connect to primary or secondary routes through tertiary routes and the informal ground network system is made part of the main network.

182 183 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
Network Generation : Mumbai Generation Process Fig 7.4.8 Generated Neighbourhood Morphology in Mumbai Site Fig 7.4.10 Global Integration [HH] Value before Geometries Re-organisation Fig 7.4.11 Global Integration [HH] Value after Geometries Re-organisation Fig 7.4.12 Network Patterns that Integrating Site with Context
0.25 0.25 1.26 1.26
Fig 7.4.9 Network Pattern after Re-organisation of Geometries

7.4.3 Network Generation : Beijing Site Specific Criteria

The network generation in the Beijing patch is governed by the contrasting context existing around the site. The network needs to form a gradient from high network density on the east to a lower network density on the west. To enable smooth transition from west to east the existing routes needed to be linked to the newly generated ones. The primary routes would be extensions of existing network and continue into the site. A similar hierarchy

of roads is aimed for as seen in the Mumbai patch. The network patterns to match the context again refers to the three aspects of network density, segment detour and cul-de-sac proportions. The network density on an average is aimed to be much higher than that of Mumbai however the segment detouring and cul-de –sac proportions to be achieved would be lower. The goal is to create linear orthogonal network routes similar to existing morphologies

to induce the possibility to create Hutong like spaces. The blocks are reorganised to convert from central public space formed in clusters to linear forms more suited to the indigenous morphologies. This is shown in the diagram that indicates the change in morphologies of the cluster.

184 185 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
Fig 7.4.13 Proposed Gradient Network Pattern in Beijing Network Concept Diagrams Primary Routes Connect to the Existing Network Network Density Gradient from West to East Public Spaces convert into linear organisation Fig 7.4.14 Configuration of Public Space in Beijing
Network Density Segment Detour : (Total
Cule-de-Sac Proportions : 324 km / 100sq.km 1.08 4/16
Fig 7.4.15 Proposed Aggregation Pattern in Beijing Site
length / distance)

7.4.3 Network Generation : Beijing Generation Process

A similar process as Mumbai is followed in Beijing site where the block reorganisation is informed by the generic principles of the network as well as specific criteria of the site. From the connectivity analysis the possible route systems are analysed and the blocks re-arranged to derive the desired network pattern. The network pattern in contrast to Mumbai is linear and continuous.

The routes connect to the existing peripheral roads which creates higher network density on the east as compared to the west. The central public spaces morph into linear forms more suited to the Hutong typologies.

186 187 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
7.4.19
Fig 7.4.16 Generated Neighbourhood Morphology in Beijing Site
Fig 7.4.18 Global Integration [HH] Value before Geometries Re-organisation Fig
Global Integration [HH] Value after Geometries Re-organisation
Fig 7.4.20 Network Patterns that Integrating Site with Context
0.31 0.31 1.35 1.35
Fig 7.4.17 Network Pattern after Re-organisation of Geometries

BLOCK DIFFERENTIATION 7.5

This is a recursive step within the process that looks at block level to introduce aspects specific to the site location. The aspects are based on two factors: the new site specific parameters which are distinct for each site and were not considered in the catalogue generation, secondly, the architectural elements which are familiar to the context and suit the local socio-cultural and climatic aspects. Subtle modifications that don’t affect the optimised parameters would be introduced in this stage.

188 189 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
7.5.1 Block Differentiation Criteria 7.5.2 Block Differentiation Mumbai 7.5.3 Block Differentiation Beijing 190 192 196

7.5.1 Block Differentiation Criteria

[12] EERE/ US Department of Energy (2013), Weather Data Source, Available from: http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ energyplus/weatherdata/2_asia_wmo_ region_2/IND_Mumbai.430030_ISHRAE. zip (Accessed in 20th, Dec, 2013 )

Total Annual Collection: 524.33 kWh/m2

Underheated Period: 58.31 kWh/m2

Overheated Period: 190.98 kWh/m

[13] EERE/ US Department of Energy (2013), Weather Data Source Available from: http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/ buildings/energyplus/weatherdata/2_ asia_wmo_region_2/CHN_Beijing. Beijing.545110_CSWD.zip (Accessed in 20th, Dec, 2013 )

Beijing

Incident solar radiation is the index that represents the exterior thermal comfort. Incident solar radiation or Insolation is a measure of solar radiation energy received on a given surface area and recorded during a given time. It is also called solar irradiation and expressed as “hourly irradiation”. The unit of measure is kilowatt-hours per square metre (kWh/m2).

The parameter would be used to create differentiation in the

Total Annual Collection: 420.20 kWh/m2

Underheated Period: 47.68 kWh/m

Overheated Period: 166.25 kWh/m

The graph shows that the comfortable value of incident solar radiation for Beijing in Winter is : 4200 kWh/m

block morphologies in the two sites. The modification would be informed by the incident solar radiation on the semi-public spaces occurring in the blocks. The block and the semi-public space morphology would be simultaneously modified till a suitable value for the incident radiation at the semi-public spaces is reached. This modification would simultaneously consider other optimised parameters so as to minimise impact on them and achieve an overall high fitness in terms of quality.

To create higher relevance of design to the location, architectural features representative of the local settings are selected. Aspects would be chosen on the basis of their socio-cultural significance, functionality and suitability to local environment. This would help relate the design to the surrounding features and still maintain independent identity. Incorporating such features provides another level of differentiation which is highly site specific and does not depend on direct computational results. Therefore different

feature element is each site are selected which can be embedded in the design logic by simple modifications so as to not sacrifice the parameters optimised in the initial process.

190 191 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
Mumbai
The graph shows that the comfortable value of incident solar radiation for Mumbai in Summer is : 1300 kWh/m2
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0 2000.0 2500.0 3000.0 3500.0 4000.0 4500.0 5000.0 5500.0 kWh/m Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0 2000.0 2500.0 3000.0 3500.0 4000.0 4500.0 5000.0 5500.0 kWh/m 2
7.5.1 Accumulative Incident Solar Radiation in Mumbai (18.9750° N, 72.8258° E)[12]
Fig
Fig 7.5.2 Accumulative Incident Solar Radiation in Beijing (39.9139° N, 116.3917° E) [13]
Fig 7.5.6 Arcade Features of Local Architectures for Shading Fig 7.5.14 Informal Pass-way as Local Architectural Features

7.5.2 Block Differentiation : Mumbai

Incident Solar Radiation

[12] EERE/ US Department of Energy (2013), Weather Data Source, Available from: http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ energyplus/weatherdata/2_asia_wmo_ region_2/IND_Mumbai.430030_ISHRAE.

zip (Accessed in 20th, Dec, 2013 )

The graph shows the ideal solar radiation value desired in the context of Mumbai. The blocks in Mumbai need to adapt for overheated seasons to provide spaces of lowered temperatures where outdoor activities can take place. The ideal value which for Mumbai is 1310 kWh/m2 is set as the target value to achieve.

Fig 7.5.4 shows the simultaneous optimisation of two opposing parameters: incident solar radiation and sky view factor. The iteration is rejected if either parameter falls below the threshold limit. Threshold for incident solar radiation is set as 1310 kWh/m2 and for sky view threshold remains at 0.53.

This type of modification is simultaneously carried out in the whole site. The resulting morphologies are analysed for the kind of semi-public spaces generated. The most common change noticed was that the semi-public spaces converted into semienclosed forms that shaded the space and reduced the incident solar radiation. These features when compared with those found in the local settings are similar in character to semi-enclosed, semipublic spaces.

192 SynchroniCity
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0 2000.0 2500.0 3000.0 3500.0 4000.0 4500.0 5000.0 5500.0 kWh/m 2
Fig 7.5.3 Accumulative Incident Solar Radiation in Mumbai (18.9750° N, 72.8258° E) [12] Fig 7.5.4 Block Re-optimisation for Incident Solar Radiation and Skyview Factor
SVF 0.72
target value radiation value target value radiation value target value radiation value SVF
SVF
Fig 7.5.5 Blocks Before/ After Optimisation
0.36
0.51

7.5.2 Block Differentiation : Mumbai

Architectural Aspects

The architectural feature selected for Mumbai is the shaded pathways that line the main streets and roads. They provide respite from the elements during the hot summer season as well as wet monsoon season. These pathways also convert onto spots for informal small shops or hawkers who capitalise on the pedestrian traffic. A number of retail units are located along these pathways.

To create these shaded corridor spaces, the modification takes place by simple extrusion or deletion of building mass. The aim

is to create continuous pathways along the streets leading into the business centre within the site.

The operation depends on the overall Floor Area Ratio and therefore the change in the floor space after the addition and deletion operations must remain minimal. These modifications are generated on the primary routes and some of the secondary routes of the site.

194 195 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
Fig 7.5.6 Arcade Features of Local Architectures for Shading Fig 7.5.7 Typical Section of Arcade Architectures Fig 7.5.8 Modification on Block Geometries Fig 7.5.9 Rendering of Street-view with Mumbai Local Architectural Features Block Geometry Before Modification Block Geometry After Volume Addition Block Geometry After Volume Deletion

7.5.3 Block Differentiation : Beijing

Incident Solar Radiation

[13] EERE/ US Department of Energy (2013), Weather Data Source Available from: http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/ buildings/energyplus/weatherdata/2_ asia_wmo_region_2/CHN_Beijing. Beijing.545110_CSWD.zip (Accessed in 20th, Dec, 2013 )

The blocks in Beijing need to be optimised for winter months when the temperatures drop below 10 degree Celsius. The aim for Beijing would be to target a higher value of incident solar radiation which would ensure that in winters these spaces get adequate solar exposure and therefore remain warm for outdoor activities.

Similar to the process in Mumbai the semi-public spaces and their corresponding blocks are modified to create spaces that receive 4250 kWh/m of incident solar radiation as well as maintain

threshold sky-view factor of 0.5. The diagrams show the trading off between the sky-view factor and incident solar radiation.

The resulting morphologies show a common trend of generating larger semi-public spaces formed by connecting two or more spaces separate ones, the spaces get elongated in east west direction to increase the solar factors. Even in the elevated forms the spaces resemble the typical courtyard morphologies.

196 SynchroniCity Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0 2000.0 2500.0 3000.0 3500.0 4000.0 4500.0 5000.0 5500.0 kWh/m 2
Fig 7.5.10 Accumulative Incident Solar Radiation in Beijing (39.9139° N, 116.3917° E) [13] Fig 7.5.11 Block Re-optimisation for Incident Solar Radiation and Skyview Factor
SVF 0.72 target value radiation value radiation value target value radiation value SVF 0.41 SVF 0.94 target value
Fig 7.5.13 Blocks Before/ After Optimisation

7.5.3 Block Differentiation : Beijing

Architectural Aspects

The architectural features selected for Beijing are the elevated pathways commonly seen as features in precedents such as the Ju’er Hotong Project. These have been adopted as they suit the cultural aspects as well as the design needs of better connectivity in higher density locations. These elevated paths in the original settings are used as informal pathways to connect residential units and create a better community links. The blocks within the site are connected

by a pathway or a built volume depending on the situation. The aim is to generate a well-connected and minimum spanning elevated route as shown in the figure Fig 7.5.14. These connections are employed in parts of the site where the average building height exceeds 20 m. This is done to reduce vertical commute as well as provide alternate paths.

198 199 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
Fig 7.5.14 Informal Pass-way as Local Architectural Features Fig 7.5.15 Typical Section of Architectures with Elevated Pass-ways Fig 7.5.16 Modification on Block Geometries Fig 7.5.17 Rendering of Street-view with Beijing Architectural Features Block Geometry After Volume Addition Block Geometry After Pass-way Addition

PROGRAMMATIC VARIATION 7.6

The aim of this design stage is to generate programmatic as well as morphological variation by using tools within the design system without sacrificing the optimized spatial quality. These new additions and modifications take into account the programmatic requirements of the site. It tests the ability of the system to generate new site specific morphologies to suit specific building requirements. Typological variation is pursued on two levels: the local level / home based retail establishments that closely link to residential use and serve daily requirements and the large scale establishments prevalent in urban scenarios.

7.6.1 Local Level Retail Units

7.6.2 Corporate Large Scale Establishments

200 201 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
202 208

Rather than conventional planning practice of zoning that is devised to separate incompatible land uses, the indigenous economy in settlements of Beijing and Mumbai are largely based on the mixed-use mode in which small retails are closely linked to residential units. We observe that, in both cultures, there are typical mixed-use built forms with distinct typological features. These autonomous morphologies have emerged and evolved with simplicity and informality.

In Beijing these units show higher significance as they are essential for the local economy. More specifically in the indigenous settlements of Beijing there are typical spatial layouts of mixed-use building typologies such as ‘shang dian xia zhai’ which means ‘store on ground floor and living space above it’, or ‘qian dian hou zhai’ that for ‘store in the front and living space at back’. These produce handicraft goods which attract the user groups such as tourists.

From a programmatic perspective, these small retail units work in close association with residential units. They are located in close proximity to residents and provide for their daily household requirements. In both the sites this is a common aspect to be considered. Additionally these small units are closely linked to social interaction spaces. They propagate informal gatherings which are commonly seen in both the indigenous case studies. The essential factor to consider for this programmatic use, is its distribution as they are localised and essential to the community.

To incorporate the local retail units in the built form, volume additions in various possible locations is proposed. The volumes utilize voids and niches produced during the generation process. By operating the modifications shown above, we are enabled with the compatibility of resolving different programmatic uses within singular blocks. The blocks are accommodated with the criteria that they have the least effect on optimised parameters.

The extra volumes for programmatic differentiation will be inserted either on the ground floor or at-least partly on the ground level in order to be accessible for the maximum number of costumers. The inserted volumes vary from T - shaped space with elevated part accessed from foyer on ground level, linear space to singular space. The addition of these volumes would add further differentiation in the blocks.

202 203 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
Overview Morphological Adaptation
Fig 7.6.2 Local Shop for Pottery Supply in Mumbai
7.6.1 Local
Units
Fig 7.6.1 Local Retail Unit for Daily Items in Beijing
Retail Supply
Fig 7.6.3 Volume Insertion for Local Retailing Usages Morphological Variation to suit Local Residential Requirments

7.6.1 Local Retail Supply Units

Criteria for Distribution

The distribution of local level retail units are informed by three aspects: Tendency to locate near main street, location to serve maximum number of households and location to provide sufficient visual surveillance.

Programme Accessibility

Streets in old Beijing used to be the public space between residential spaces and administrative-commercial spaces. And according to this strategy, street hierarchy addresses not only the density of pedestrian flow but also informs the programmatic allocation within urban scenarios.

Primary hierarchies of routes are preferred locations for stores as they are most accessible for large population. This large population is essential for department stores, which require a considerable turnover. Examples such as the Bell & Drum Commercial Street and the Qian Men Commercial Street are proved to follow this pattern.

Connectivity

These stores are the closest source for retail of raw & cooked food for daily use, it is an inevitable element to achieve a self-sufficient neighbourhood.

According to this, it is optimal for the stores to be located in the spot that all the households are within a certain distance. Taking this criterion into account stores must be placed at strategic locations that show connectivity to maximum number of houses.

Visual Controllability

In describing the configuration of street, Jane Jacobs’ put forward the concept of casual surveillance by local shop owners. This theory on visual surveillance, also known as “eyes on the street” [14] became Jacobs’ best known concept and indicates that dwell-able streets with small-scale commerce and a high density of residents are the best means to ensure street safety, since the informal surveillance by the street’s denizens and merchants creates the sense of well-being and safety. The inverse of street eyes, Jacobs called them “blind” places, characterized many recent urban renewal projects.

The local stores will prefer to be located where maximum area of street spaces can be visually surveillanced and minimum area is in ‘blind’ place within the site.

Pedestrian Preference Simulation is performed in order to simulate the pedestrian movement density in the site. This is one of the possible circumstances indicating the spots where local pedestrians tend to influx or gather.

In order to cover the maximum number of local households with minimum number of units. A Genetic Algorithm is applied to search for the optimal locations.

The algorithm aims to allocate stores where local households are within 100m radius which is a 2 minute walk according to pedestrian speed of 4.75 kilometres per hour (2.95 mph).

Depthmap controllability analysis was introduced to ascertain where people might or might not feel exposed or secluded, safe or vulnerable.

Also, it indicates the visual-dominant areas that guarantee the observers to easily see people’s activities without difficulty being seen by observed people.

The local stores will prefer to be located in spots with high controllability values.

204 205 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
Distribution Analysis Maps
Network Hierarchy Programme Location Isovist Area Programme Location Programme Accessibility Programme Location Area accessible within 100m
BEIJING MUMBAI
Fig 7.6.4 Typical Street Hierarchies Fig 7.6.5 Accessibility of Retail Unit Fig 7.6.6 Areas Under Visual Surveillance
Visual Controlability Low High
Fig 7.6.9 Accessibility Analysis of Beijing Site Fig 7.6.7 Visual Controllability Analysis of Beijing Site Fig 7.6.8 Visual Controllability Analysis of Mumbai Site
Pedestrian Density Low High
Fig 7.6.10 Accessibility Analysis of Mumbai Site Fig 7.6.11 Pedestrian Preference Simulation of Beijing Site Fig 7.6.12 Pedestrian Preference Simulation of Mumbai Site
[14]. Jacobs, J. (1961).
New York
The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Vintage Books-Random House,

The mapped information from the three criteria connectivity, programme accessibility and visual controllability inform the location of the retail units. The three layers of information are overlapped and the locations adding up to the highest probability are identified to create programmatic differentiation. The map below shows the location of blocks which would be

modified. Understandably most of the blocks to be modified are located on main streets, primarily at junctions. Smaller blocks are evenly distributed through the site. However, there is a higher concentration of these blocks in the North-western part where there is a higher population density rather than the opposite side where the density is comparatively low.

The distribution pattern for retail units in Mumbai also follows a similar approach of overlaying the three layers of information: criteria connectivity, programme accessibility and visual controllability to generate the location of blocks to be modified.

The pattern in Mumbai site turned out to be an even distribution,

where most of the units are located in close proximity or adjacent to public squares which shows some reminisce of indigenous settings.

206 207 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
0 250 m 0 250 m Beijing Mumbai 7.6.1 Local Retail Supply Units
Fig 7.6.13 Distribution of Local Retail Programmes in Beijing Site Fig 7.6.14 Distribution of Local Retail Programmes in Mumbai Site

7.6.2 Corporate Large-scale Establishments

Morphology Type I

Office/ Business Cubicles / Commercial and Instituitional Functions

Block Morphologies for Differentiated Programmes

Morphology Type II

Markets / Exhibitions / Workshops that Requires Larger Floor Spans

Morphology Type II

Malls / Multiplexes / Auditoriums that Requires Multi-level Volumes

Morphological Variation to suit Urban Programmatic Requirements

According to the programmatic usages, we proposed block with differentiated morphologies.This is one example which is from the aggregation of small office/ business cubicles. it is generated with floor spaces that relate to offcice cubicles. Porosity is of significnce here as it would affect ventilation and lighting factors.

Also, we are able to produce blocks suitable for exhibition spaces/ workshops which is featured by large spanning spaces and have flexibility in terms of interior layout. These spaces have porous ground floor which generates shaded area for outdoor markets or other informal activities

208 209 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
Fig 7.6.16 Modernised Working Space in Mumbai Fig 7.6.15 Modernised Working Space in Mumbai
4-8m 4-8m 12-24m 8-24m 20-40m 20-40m Overview
Programmatic/ Morphological Differentiation

7.6.2 Corporate Large-scale Establishments

Potential Intervention for Mumbai

A high rise typology that accomodates office / commercial functions and serves to provide a landmark type identity to the site with its typologically distinct volume

High porosity on the ground level. Ideal location for high street retail units as the space can accomodate high pedestrian flows associated with such programmes.

Business Centre for Mumbai

As an example for programmatic differentiation, to accommodate non-residential function, the central emergent space in the Mumbai site is chosen. Generically the centre of settlement is usually typified by a concentration of retail, office buildings and other public activities. More specifically, in Mumbai there are several Business Districts located in the centre of neighbourhood such as Belapur, Nariman Point, Ballard Estate, Bandra Kurla Complex and Andheri.

The morphology reacts to the quality attributes of neighbouring blocks. It generates in a manner that the optimised quality of residential blocks is not sacrificed.

Similarly the design ambition could be the establishment of a programmatically different sector located in the geographical centre of the site with a vibrant business environment that aims at shifting a portion of the economic dependence of Thane out of the Mumbai core and into the hinterland of the site.

The example shown here is an establishment that could house offices as well as technology centres, being designed and developed in order to promote local business. The growing BPO (Business process outsourcing) sector could be also be part of the centre. The morphology takes into account the surrounding built forms are their quality attributes, the geometry of the emergent space, high porosity at the ground level for pedestrian activities to support large retail shops and the ambition to generate a high rise typology that gives an identity to the space.

210 211 Neighbourhood Level Design Development SynchroniCity
Fig 7.6.16 Programmatic/ Morphological Differentiation Fig 7.6.16 Programmatic/ Morphological Differentiation: Example of Mumbai Central Core Proposed Plots for Differentiated Programmatic Usages

CRITICAL ANALYSIS

The last chapter aims at evaluating and analysing the results of our design research. For the design conclusion we would critically revisit three aspects that focuses over the established evolutionary system, the fulfilment of design objectives, as well as the emergence of architectural properties during the bottom-up aggregation. Potential further refinements will be discussed in terms of system adaptation and materialisation.

8.1 Conclusions

8.1.1

8.1.2

212 213 Critical Analysis SynchroniCity
8
Accomplishments
System
Objectives Fulfilment
Emergent Attributes Observations
System Evaluation and Future Prospects 213 214 216 218 233
Design
8.1.3
8.2

8.1.1 System Accomplishments

Differentiated Morphogenesis Quantifiable Spatial Parameters

The generation created differentiation at all three levels of design

Block Level Differentiation looked at sitespecific requirements in terms of solar factors as well as local architectural aspects. Different morphological modifications were based on these aspects

Cluster Level Differentiation looked at configuration of public spaces. In Beijing the spaces converted into linear organisation and in Mumbai these became large centralised spaces.

The evolutionary system that we established is an attempt to reinterpret the indigenous attributes in urbanised scenario. The system adopts to the localised socio-cultural aspects as well as to satisfy the high urban population density requirement via midrise residential typologies which are embodiments of quantifiable spatial parameters.

Generic block geometries are generated as the output of the system which featured by elevated semi-public spaces, and can be developed into urban fabrics during the bottom-up aggregation.

According to the evaluation of sample blocks we realised that although all the quantified parameters that describe the spatial value may not be able to achieve a high score at the same time, an overall high fitness value is still guaranteed.

Neighbourhood level accomplished site specific requirements of network connectivity and network patterns, density requirements and density gradients. The system was used to generate two very different urban scenarios that relate to the site context.

Density Gradients were referenced from the site surroundings and were part of the architectural ambition to create a smooth transition of height and density into the site.

214 215 Critical Analysis SynchroniCity 10 F F F F F F 10 12 8 F 6 F 4 F 2 F 0 F 4 F 2 F 0 F 10 F 12 F 8 6 4 2 0
+0 m Shaded Area Proportion Sky View Factor Incident Solar Radiation +6 m +9 m 0.82 0.45 369 0.76 0.45 339 0.57 0.38 287 0.56 0.41 284 +3 m Semi-public Space Height 1 2 3 4 +0 m +6 m +9 m +3 m 1 2 3 4 +0 m +3 m +6 m +9 m Sky View Factor 0.56 0.57 0.76 0.82 Enclosure Value 1.77 0.69 1.02 1.44 Incident Solar Radiation (Wh/m ) 287 284 369 339 Shaded Area Proportion 23% 23% 25% 21%
Fig 8.1.2 Incident Solar Radiation/ Shaded Area Proportion/ Sky View Factor of Semi-public Spaces Fig 8.1.3
the Values of Evaluation
Fig 8.1.1 Exploded Section View of Sample Block
Table Showing
1 2 3 4 Cluster_Q_02
Fig 8.1.4 Comparison between Differentiated Geometries in Block/ Cluster/ Neighbourhood Scale

8.1.2 Design Objectives Fulfilment Comparative Analysis of Parameters and Design Ambitions

The generated spatial attributes show characteristics that are intermediate between the typical urban and typical indigenous settings (Ranwar Village has been taken as the representative standard for indigenous settings to compare parameters). The values for the generation in Mumbai tend to be similar to the indigenous settings whereas the ones in Beijing are more similar to the urban patch. They may possibly be due to the different density requirement of each site. In most respect the density attributes were achieved as per the design ambitions and goals. Apart from this the quality attributes would have been affected in the process, however with the site specific differentiation each site possess its own differentiable attributes.

216 217 Critical Analysis SynchroniCity
Ranwar Village, Mumbai Proposed Design in Thane, Mumbai Proposed Design in Rongshu, Beijing Typical Urban Cluster r = 90 m r = 95 m r = 95 m r = 175 m
3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0 Incident Solar Radiation Shaded Area Proportion Enclosure Value Sky View Factor x 2 Quality Score Density Score (FAR) Ranwar Village_ Mumbai Mumbai Sample Office Buildings Beijing Sample Urban Cluster Samples Samples 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0 Incident Solar Radiation Shaded Area Proportion Enclosure Value Sky View Factor x 2 Quality Score Density Score (FAR) Ranwar Village_ Mumbai Mumbai Sample Office Buildings Beijing Sample Urban Cluster Samples Samples Site Name Rongshu, Beijing Thane, Mumbai Site Area (m2) 1,287,969 1,381,265 Total Built Up Area (m2) 2,685,646 2,024,186 Population 59,681 44,982 Population Density (p/ha) 463 326 FAR value 2.09 1.47
Fig
8.1.5
Comparison between Indigenous/ Urban Scenarios and Proposed Interventions
Plot Area: 22513 m Coverage Radius: 90 m Plot Area: 19401-22513 m2 Coverage Radius: 95 m Plot Area: 54179 m Coverage Radius: 150 m Plot Area: 19401-22513 m2 Coverage Radius: 95 m
Fig 8.1.6 Statistics Obtained in the Design generated on each site

8.1.3 Emergent Attributes Observations

Comparative Analysis of Network Patterns

Apart from these, we also evaluate the emergent properties that the generated network patterns embed. Samples of Ballwin and San Francisco are introduced for their distinct network configurations and will be compared with the street patterns generated in both sites. Ballwin represents an ideal and uncompromising example for branching network system which is partly adopted in generation of Mumbai network. And San Francisco is an example of planning with strict grid-iron network system partly reflected in the planning of Beijing.

Cul-de-sac patterns(Fig 8.1.7) are a recognisable feature that characterise the

development of low-density urbanism. As an analogue structure to leaf veins, there are multiple hierarchies from primary branches to minor ones. And the result from Depthmap Global Integration [HH] Value analysis shows a clear integration at the main streets.

Grid patterns (Fig 8.1.10), on the other hand, are favoured by urban planners in dense scenarios currently. Opposite to the hierarchical cul-de-sac patterns, gridiron systems usually simplify it into a two-level hierarchy from street to the destination as Albert Pope described [1]. And the Global Integration [HH] Value analysis shows streets patterns of

homogeneity.

The network patterns adopted in the design are produced by observing and manipulating the spatial elements of the two existing network systems, we are able to generate network patterns for both Mumbai and Beijing sites which are intermediaries to both types of systems. We manipulate spatial factors such as network density, segment detouring and cul-de-sac proportions. And the results of Global Integration [HH] Analysis illustrate that the generated patterns are hybrid that not only spans between but also cooperates typical branching and grid system.

218 219 Critical Analysis SynchroniCity
BRANCHED HIERARCHICAL BALLWIN MUMBAI SITE BEIJING SITE SAN FRANCISCO GRID HOMOGENEOUS 0.06 0.13 0.11 0.19 0.22 0.43 0.31 0.64
Fig 8.1.7 Streets Patterns and Global Integration [HH] Value of Ballwin Fig 8.1.8 Proposed Streets Patterns and Global Integration [HH] Value of Thane, Mumbai Fig 8.1.10 Proposed Streets Patterns and Global Integration [HH] Value of Rongshu, Beijing Fig 8.1.11 Streets Patterns and Global Integration [HH] Value of San Francisco
[1]. Pope, A. (2008), Terminal Distribution Architectural Design, 78: 16–21. doi: 10.1002/ ad.603, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

8.1.3 Emergent Attributes Observations

Informal Network Evaluation Emergent Ground Network

The inherent property of the individual blocks constitute void spaces on the ground. Following the aggregation process, it is observed that these small passages become part of a larger network system. This emergent phenomena gives rise to shaded, informal corridor spaces that can be used as alternate network paths. These hold very different characteristic to other network systems. These informal network systems not only improve integration but also provide shorter routes to the destinations. Some of these routes run continuously upto 160 M.

Elevated Network

Elevated passages are proved to be a means that can reduce vertical transport as well as connect the semi-public spaces with the informal network analogue to indigenous precedents. Incorporating these in high density situations provides an alternate connectivity and better integration.

Shading Quality on Streets

The informal networks are evaluated for their spatial quality. The street configuration in Mumbai shows an alternate between shaded / unshaded areas with solar radiance level varying from around 50Wh/ m2 to 450 Wh/m2 While on the other hand, networks in Beijing show a preference of continuous solar accessibility.

Average Radiance Value: 318 Wh/m2

220 221 Critical Analysis SynchroniCity
10 m 10 m 21 m 40 m 31 m 36 m 18 m 12 m 16 m 10 m 18 m Radiance Wh / m2 450 405 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Radiance Wh / m 450 405 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0
Beijing Site Example Location Under Reference
Fig 8.1.12 Perspective View of Informal Networks Fig 8.1.13 Exploded View of Informal Networks Fig 8.1.14 Incident Solar Radiation of Informal Networks in Mumbai Fig 8.1.15 Incident Solar Radiation of Informal Networks in Beijing

8.1.3 Emergent Attributes Observations

Morphological Versatility Evaluation

Analogue to traditional courtyard houses, the generated morphology organises the living units around common spaces shared by a few households. Also, the open spaces functions as the element that adds influx to the circulation system.

Minimum spanning floor depths is one of the features of multi-storey slab buildings. Thus aid in improving natural lighting as well as ventilation flows.

Floor set-backs prevailing in mass/ collective housing projects. It increases valid daylighting area and at the same time provide better view and private terraces for each residential unit.

Elevated passages can be found in precedent projects as an approach to achieve self-sufficient neighbourhoods by reinforce the interlink between adjacent residential buildings. Such informal passages also remit the pedestrian density on the ground.

222 223 Critical Analysis SynchroniCity
Photographs of 3D-printed Sectioning Models
224 225 Critical Analysis SynchroniCity
226 227 Critical Analysis SynchroniCity +0 +0 +6 +6 +12 +0 +0 +24 +6 +6 +30 +12 +12 +36 +18 +42 +0 +0 +6 +6 +12 +12 +18 Visualisations Mumbai : Street Views Mumbai : Sections Section AA’ Section BB’ Section CC’ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 4 2 5 3 6 7 8 9
228 229 Critical Analysis SynchroniCity +0 +0 +6 +6 +12 +12 +0 +0 +6 +6 +12 +18 +12 +18 +0 +0 +6 +6 +12 +12 +18
Street Views 1 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 Beijing : Sections 1 4 2 5 3 6 7 8 9 Section AA’ Section BB’ Section CC’
Visualisations Beijing :

The System

The system developed in the this process comprised of a logic which was a combination of bottom-up and top-down approaches. This aspect allowed a synchronous combination of emergent characteristics and architectural ambitions. The stage based approach of design from catalogue to site specific scenarios is one of the critical aspect that has been raised a number of times. An alternate approach could use the same logic of generation without involving the cataloguing process. This would involve generating each block independently within the context of a site. This approach would produce highly specific block morphologies that appease all aspects of the site, but the process would be computationally extremely heavy as a large number of parameters and a large number of blocks would need simultaneous optimization. The stage based approach provides this advantage that the parameters are separated into different levels, so at every level certain base characteristic of morphology is always maintained. A number of additions and modifications can be investigated for the process to make it tackle more diverse parameters and attributes.

System Adaptation for Other Context

There are several aspects that could be further revisited or refined. One of them is to discuss the potential ways how the evolutionary system could be adapted into other

8.2 System Evaluation and Future Development

cultures and regions. Morphological elements of local architectures are to be critically reinterpreted in order to achieve socio-cultural and native climatic identity. Apart from the calibrating the system to new parameters, scenarios and context, the system would need to accommodate local architectural features which play a significant role in daily life.

One potential practice of adapting the system into arid regions is to imitate the morphological features that make use of the towering lofts as ventilation tunnels. The loft known as windcatcher is a traditional Persian architectural element to create natural ventilation in buildings. It is a low cost and efficient strategy that is disappearing due to urbanisation. By adding in socio-cultural and climatic specific criterion, geometries generated from the system should be able to differentiate with chimney-featured morphologies in order to create a pressure gradient which allows hot air to travel upwards and escape out the top. Another morphological adaptation that could take place in hydroponic regions is to learn from localised step wells in Hampi. It is a typical example of how the socio-cultural as well as climatic requirements are embedded within building typology. Analogously, generated block geometries could be specifically developed in order to incorporate water storage system in design.

232 233 Critical Analysis SynchroniCity
Fig 8.2.1 Typical Windcather Morphologies in Yazd, Iran Fig 8.2.1 Typical Stepwell Morphology in Hampi

Aggregation Strategies

Further research could be into revisiting the local geometries and derive other possible aggregation strategies. As the embodiment of quantified spatial parameters, the generated blocks are aggregated with elaboration to avoid deformation that may affect the parameters. However, such distortion-free aggregation logic always produces urban fabrics composed by orthogonal oriented geometries.

A possible discussion could be about the trading off between achieving the spatial parameters and the attaining of greater flexibility of geometric formation. Subdivision could be operated on generated block morphologies that allows each divided part to have the capacity of individual adjustment.

The blocks will be controlled by bounding geometries that exert moderate deformation for each part of the block. And in this way the geometries are enabled to attain greater flexibility in aggregation patterns as well as to fit in irregular plot footprints.

Material Differentiation

Differentiation on the basis of material application would be another study that can be pursued. Using local low cost material would not only and economic sustainability but also create an identity that is representative of that location. The images show some examples where the local material combined with recycled material can used. And usage of such location specific materials become part of the process.

As is also an inevitable element of indigenous architectures, localised material could be further discussed at the next stage. Liu Jiakun’s Rebirth Brick Project shows the potential of using recycled local architectural material. The bricks are recycled and sterilized from demolished old buildings. And the fractured material segments are mixed with wheat straws that act as reinforcing fibres.

As the hollow brick is a composite of used material debris, added cement and wheat straws, it is light-weighted and can be produced easily with semi-manual leveraging tools that are widely used in China by the local crafting industry. The composite brick could be an appropriate choice for 3-5 storey residences for lower income communities.

Bamboo mould concrete is the material produced by novel concrete forming techniques devised by Wang Shu in several of his recent projects. Strips of bamboo are applied to form the mould rather than the conventional planks of wood. The thin strips of bamboo can benefit in terms of low-tech fabrication

as well as in creating context-rooted facade textures. Different from the hollow bricks, the bamboo mould concrete could be the ideal material for 5-8 storey residences for higher income communities.

234 235 Critical Analysis SynchroniCity
8.2 System Evaluation
and Future Development
Fig 8.2.3 Liu Jiakun’s Rebirth Brick Project in Venice Architecture Biennale 08 Fig 8.2.4 Details of Wang Shu’s Ningbo History Museum

8.2 System Evaluation and Future Development

Architectural Detail Possibility

The process in the future would need to establish detail architectural requirements in terms of floor layouts and services. A small exercise was conducted to attempt to accommodate different arrangements of housing units according to the urban requirements. Varying from one room studio apartments to up three bedroom apartments with single or doubled floored. The

plans were made taking into reference of the planning aspects followed in Mumbai and Beijing. Different kinds of housing units can be generated for different requirements. The houses can be set within the block in a tetris interlocking arrangements. The semipublic spaces would be located at the entrance of each house unit.

236 237 Critical Analysis SynchroniCity 16 m Type 32 m2 Type 2 48 m2 Type 3 64 m Type 4 Type 5 48
90 m2 Type 6 64 m 90 m Type 7 64
90 m Type 12 Type 13 Type 14
m2
m2

APPENDIX

238 239 Appendix SynchroniCity

Block Generation Evaluation 1- Sky View Factor

240 241 Appendix SynchroniCity
SVF: 0.59 L_Q_01 SVF: 0.69 L_QD_01 SVF: 0.54 L_D_01 SVF: 0.59 L_Q_05 SVF: 0.48 L_QD_05 SVF: 0.38 L_D_05 SVF: 0.53 L_Q_02 SVF: 0.65 L_QD_02 SVF:0.48 L_D_02 SVF: 0.72 L_Q_06 SVF: 0.65 L_QD_06 SVF: 0.42 L_D_06 SVF: 0.53 L_Q_03 SVF: 0.52 L_QD_03 SVF:0.53 L_D_03 SVF: 0.59 L_Q_07 SVF: 0.68 L_QD_07 SVF: 0.42 L_D_07 SVF: 0.61 L_Q_04 SVF: 0.62 L_QD_04 SVF: 0.50 L_D_04 SVF: 0.60 L_Q_08 SVF: 0.70 L_QD_08 SVF: 0.51 L_D_08 SVF: 0.76 SVF: 0.63 SVF: 0.63 SVF: 0.67 SVF: 0.72 SVF: 0.74 SVF: 0.61 SVF: 0.74 SVF: 0.64 SVF: 0.68 SVF: 0.74 SVF: 0.74 SVF: 0.71 SVF: 0.67 SVF: 0.63 SVF: 0.66 SVF: 0.45 SVF: 0.74 SVF: 0.43 SVF: 0.66 SVF: 0.43 SVF: 0.71 SVF: 0.47 SVF: 0.66 M_Q_01 M_Q_05 M_Q_02 M_Q_06 M_Q_03 M_Q_07 M_Q_04 M_Q_08 M_QD_01 M_QD_05 M_QD_02 M_QD_06 M_QD_03 M_QD_07 M_QD_04 M_QD_08 M_D_01 M_D_05 M_D_02 M_D_06 M_D_03 M_D_07 M_D_04 M_D_08 Large Plot Typology 2 (QD) Large Plot Typology 3 (D) Large Plot Typology (Q) Medium Plot Typology 2 (QD) Medium Plot Typology 3 (D) Medium Plot Typology (Q) 50% 50% Q D 50% 50% Q D 80% 20% Q D 80% 20% Q D 20% 80% Q D 20% 80% Q D

Block Generation Evaluation 1- Sky View Factor

242 243 Appendix SynchroniCity SVF: 0.83 S_Q_01 SVF: 0.73 S_QD_01 SVF: 0.81 S_Q_05 SVF: 0.85 S_QD_05 SVF: 0.82 S_Q_02 SVF: 0.79 S_QD_02 SVF: 0.62 S_Q_06 SVF: 0.81 S_QD_06 SVF: 0.87 S_Q_03 SVF: 0.81 S_QD_03 SVF: 0.83 S_Q_07 SVF: 0.77 S_QD_07 SVF: 0.79 S_Q_04 SVF: 0.72 S_QD_04 SVF: 0.81 S_Q_08 SVF: 0.63 S_QD_08 SVF: 0.84 S_D_01 SVF: 0.86 S_D_05 SVF: 0.71 S_D_02 SVF: 0.76 S_D_06 SVF: 0.75 S_D_03 SVF: 0.80 S_D_07 SVF: 0.80 S_D_04 SVF: 0.84 S_D_08 Sky View Factor < 0.5 Evaluation Criteria Generated Block Individuals Average Typology 1 (Q) L_Q_01 L_Q_02 L_Q_03 L_Q_04 L_Q_05 L_Q_06 L_Q_07 L_Q_08 Sky View Factor 0.59 0.53 0.53 0.61 0.59 0.72 0.59 0.60 0.60 Typology 2 (QD) L_QD_01 L_QD_02 L_QD_03 L_QD_04 L_QD_05 L_QD_06 L_QD_07 L_QD_08 Sky View Factor 0.69 0.65 0.52 0.62 0.48 0.65 0.68 0.70 0.62 Typology 3 (D) L_D_01 L_D_02 L_D_03 L_D_04 L_D_05 L_D_06 L_D_07 L_D_08 Sky View Factor 0.54 0.48 0.53 0.50 0.38 0.42 0.42 0.51 0.47 Typology 1 (Q) M_Q_01 M_Q_02 M_Q_03 M_Q_04 M_Q_05 M_Q_06 M_Q_07 M_Q_08 Sky View Factor 0.76 0.63 0.72 0.61 0.63 0.67 0.74 0.74 0.69 Typology 2 (QD) M_QD_01 M_QD_02 M_QD_03 M_QD_04 M_QD_05 M_QD_06 M_QD_07 M_QD_08 Sky View Factor 0.64 0.74 0.71 0.63 0.68 0.74 0.67 0.66 0.68 Typology 3 (D) M_D_01 M_D_02 M_D_03 M_D_04 M_D_05 M_D_06 M_D_07 M_D_08 Sky View Factor 0.45 0.43 0.43 0.47 0.74 0.66 0.71 0.66 0.57 Typology 1 (Q) S_Q_01 S_Q_02 S_Q_03 S_Q_04 S_Q_05 S_Q_06 S_Q_07 S_Q_08 Sky View Factor 0.83 0.82 0.87 0.79 0.81 0.62 0.83 0.81 0.80 Typology 2 (QD) S_QD_01 S_QD_02 S_QD_03 S_QD_04 S_QD_05 S_QD_06 S_QD_07 S_QD_08 Sky View Factor 0.73 0.79 0.81 0.72 0.85 0.81 0.77 0.63 0.76 Typology 3 (D) S_D_01 S_D_02 S_D_03 S_D_04 S_D_05 S_D_06 S_D_07 S_D_08 Sky View Factor 0.84 0.71 0.75 0.80 0.86 0.76 0.80 0.84 0.80 Medium Plot Large Plot Small Plot
Small Plot Typology 2 (QD) Small Plot Typology 3 (D) Small Plot Typology (Q) 50% 50% Q D 80% 20% Q D 20% 80% Q D

Block Generation Catalogue- Quality and Density Parameter Values

244 245 Appendix SynchroniCity Large Plot Size: 1600 m FAR OSR CL SFR EV Quality Score Density Score Final Score TBA (m ) Value Score Value Score Value Score Value Score Value Score L_Q_01 8691 1.81 0.55 20% 1.00 42 0.64 11% 0.52 1.30 0.62 5.29 5.43 10.72 L_Q_02 6800 1.42 0.28 14% 0.63 28 1.00 10% 0.67 1.00 0.48 4.77 4.25 9.02 L_Q_03 6324 1.32 0.22 14% 0.63 32 0.94 6% 1.00 1.20 0.57 5.28 3.95 9.23 L_Q_04 8006 1.67 0.45 17% 0.84 40 0.70 10% 0.67 1.00 0.48 4.94 5.00 9.94 L_Q_05 7958 1.66 0.45 17% 0.84 47 0.49 10% 0.67 0.90 0.43 4.58 4.97 9.55 L_Q_06 8774 1.83 0.56 14% 0.63 60 0.10 11% 0.52 1.30 0.62 3.50 5.48 8.98 L_Q_07 8685 1.81 0.55 16% 0.78 26 1.00 9% 0.83 1.10 0.52 5.48 5.43 10.91 L_Q_08 7142 1.49 0.32 16% 0.78 31 0.97 8% 1.00 1.10 0.52 5.68 4.46 10.14 Average: 7798 1.62 0.42 16% 0.77 38 0.73 9% 0.74 1.11 0.53 4.94 4.87 9.81 L_QD_01 9645 2.01 0.66 14% 0.63 52 0.34 11% 0.52 1.00 0.48 2.60 10.05 12.64 L_QD_02 10035 2.09 0.70 14% 0.63 37 0.79 11% 0.52 1.20 0.57 3.14 10.45 13.59 L_QD_03 9309 1.94 0.63 14% 0.63 48 0.46 11% 0.52 1.20 0.57 2.81 9.70 12.51 L_QD_04 9939 2.07 0.69 14% 0.63 57 0.19 11% 0.52 1.30 0.62 2.59 10.35 12.94 L_QD_05 9693 2.02 0.67 14% 0.63 51 0.37 11% 0.52 1.20 0.57 2.72 10.10 12.82 L_QD_06 9741 2.03 0.67 14% 0.63 27 1.00 11% 0.52 0.90 0.43 3.21 10.15 13.36 L_QD_07 9501 1.98 0.65 13% 0.55 48 0.46 11% 0.52 1.30 0.62 2.70 9.90 12.60 L_QD_08 10928 2.28 0.77 13% 0.55 50 0.40 11% 0.52 0.80 0.38 2.40 11.38 13.78 Average: 9849 2.05 0.68 14% 0.61 46 0.50 11% 0.52 1.11 0.53 2.77 10.26 13.03 L_D_01 14889 3.10 1.00 12% 0.46 60 0.10 12% 0.37 1.20 0.57 1.18 21.71 22.89 L_D_02 15802 3.29 1.00 12% 0.46 58 0.16 11% 0.52 1.40 0.67 1.36 23.04 24.40 L_D_03 14547 3.03 1.00 11% 0.36 59 0.13 11% 0.52 1.20 0.57 1.16 21.21 22.38 L_D_04 13155 2.74 0.93 12% 0.46 46 0.52 13% 0.22 1.50 0.71 1.42 19.18 20.61 L_D_05 12387 2.58 0.88 13% 0.55 55 0.25 13% 0.22 1.20 0.57 1.28 18.06 19.35 L_D_06 14794 3.08 1.00 12% 0.46 46 0.52 11% 0.52 1.40 0.67 1.58 21.57 23.15 L_D_07 14544 3.03 1.00 13% 0.55 55 0.25 12% 0.37 1.60 0.76 1.49 21.21 22.70 L_D_08 14794 3.08 1.00 12% 0.46 60 0.10 12% 0.37 1.60 0.76 1.29 21.57 22.87 Average: 14364 2.99 0.98 12% 0.47 55 0.25 12% 0.39 1.39 0.66 1.35 20.95 22.29
Size: 1024 m FAR OSR CL SFR EV Quality Score Density Score Final Score TBA (m2 Value Score Value Score Value Score Value Score Value Score M_Q_01 5984 1.95 0.63 17% 0.84 24 1.00 11% 1.00 1.20 0.57 5.95 5.84 11.80 M_Q_02 6698 2.18 0.73 14% 0.63 35 0.85 11% 0.83 1.10 0.52 4.85 6.54 11.39 M_Q_03 5696 1.85 0.58 17% 0.84 36 0.82 12% 0.80 1.20 0.57 5.42 5.56 10.98 M_Q_04 5792 1.89 0.60 17% 0.84 30 1.00 12% 1.00 1.20 0.57 5.95 5.66 11.61 M_Q_05 6266 2.04 0.67 15% 0.71 27 1.00 12% 1.00 1.00 0.48 5.45 6.12 11.57 M_Q_06 5018 1.63 0.43 15% 0.71 24 1.00 12% 1.00 0.90 0.43 5.39 4.90 10.29 M_Q_07 5696 1.85 0.58 17% 0.84 28 1.00 10% 1.00 1.10 0.52 5.89 5.56 11.45 M_Q_08 3722 1.21 0.17 24% 1.00 0 1.00 11% 1.00 0.90 0.43 6.20 3.63 9.83 Average: 5609 1.83 0.55 17% 0.80 26 0.96 11% 0.95 1.08 0.51 5.64 5.48 11.11 M_QD_01 5696 1.85 0.58 14% 0.63 25 1.00 12% 0.52 1.20 0.57 3.35 9.27 12.62 M_QD_02 5690 1.85 0.58 11% 0.36 27 1.00 12% 0.52 1.00 0.48 2.72 9.26 11.98 M_QD_03 5888 1.92 0.61 14% 0.63 56 0.22 10% 0.37 1.20 0.57 2.42 9.58 12.00 M_QD_04 5984 1.95 0.63 14% 0.63 30 1.00 12% 0.37 1.20 0.57 3.20 9.74 12.94 M_QD_05 5354 1.74 0.51 12% 0.46 25 1.00 11% 0.37 1.10 0.52 2.81 8.71 11.53 M_QD_06 5840 1.90 0.61 17% 0.84 25 1.00 11% 0.37 1.20 0.57 3.62 9.51 13.13 M_QD_07 7286 2.37 0.81 16% 0.78 37 0.79 11% 0.67 1.40 0.67 3.69 11.86 15.55 M_QD_08 5984 1.95 0.63 16% 0.78 51 0.37 11% 0.52 1.40 0.67 3.12 9.74 12.86 Average: 5965 1.94 0.62 14% 0.64 35 0.80 11% 0.46 1.21 0.58 3.12 9.71 12.82 M_D_01 6224 2.03 0.67 16% 0.78 25 1.00 10% 0.37 1.40 0.67 2.16 14.18 16.34 M_D_02 7142 2.32 0.79 16% 0.78 50 0.40 10% 0.37 1.50 0.71 1.83 16.27 18.10 M_D_03 6710 2.18 0.74 17% 0.84 57 0.19 13% 0.67 1.40 0.67 1.92 15.29 17.21 M_D_04 5888 1.92 0.61 16% 0.78 30 1.00 12% 0.37 1.50 0.71 2.19 13.42 15.60 M_D_05 6854 2.23 0.75 17% 0.84 50 0.40 11% 0.52 1.30 0.62 1.93 15.62 17.55 M_D_06 7046 2.29 0.78 16% 0.78 51 0.37 11% 0.52 1.50 0.71 1.90 16.06 17.95 M_D_07 6518 2.12 0.71 18% 0.90 47 0.49 10% 0.52 1.30 0.62 2.06 14.85 16.91 M_D_08 6176 2.01 0.66 16% 0.78 44 0.58 10% 0.52 1.30 0.62 1.97 14.07 16.04 Average: 6570 2.14 0.71 17% 0.81 44 0.55 11% 0.48 1.40 0.67 1.99 14.97 16.96 Quality Quality Quality Quality Eliminated in Evaluation 2- Architectural Aspects Eliminated in Evaluation 2- Architectural Aspects Eliminated in Evaluation 1- Sky View Factor Eliminated in Evaluation 1- Sky View Factor Density Density Density Density Q Q Q Q D D D D Total Built Area (TBA) Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Open Space Ratio(OSR) Circulation Length (CL) Total Built Area (TBA) Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Open Space Ratio(OSR) Circulation Length (CL) South Facing Surface Ratio (SFR) Enclosure Value (EV) Sky View Factor (SVF) South Facing Surface Ratio (SFR) Enclosure Value (EV) Sky View Factor (SVF) OSR OSR FAR FAR CL CL SFR SFR EV EV 50% 50% 50% 50% 80% 80% 80% 80% 20% 20% 20% 20% 50% 50% 50% 50% 20% 20% 20% 20% 80% 80% 80% 80% Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q D D D D D D D D D D D D L_Q_01 L_D_01 L_Q_05 L_QD_06 L_Q_03 L_QD_03 L_D_03 L_Q_07 L_QD_07 L_QD_04 L_D_04 L_D_08 M_Q_01 M_Q_05 M_Q_02 M_Q_03 M_QD_01 M_QD_06 M_QD_07 M_QD_04 M_D_05 M_D_06 M_D_07 M_D_08 Typology 1 Typology 1 Typology 1 Typology 1 Typology 2 Typology 2 Typology 2 Typology 2 Typology 3 Typology 3 Typology 3 Typology 3
Medium Plot

Block Generation Catalogue- Quality and Density Parameter Values

246 247 Appendix SynchroniCity Small Plot Size: 576 m2 FAR OSR CL SFR EV Quality Score Density Score Final Score TBA (m ) Value Score Value Score Value Score Value Score Value Score S_Q_01 1738 1.01 0.08 44% 1.00 19 1.00 15% 0.08 0.80 0.38 4.85 3.02 7.86 S_Q_02 1795 1.04 0.10 32% 1.00 17 1.00 10% 0.67 0.90 0.43 5.74 3.12 8.85 S_Q_03 1784 1.03 0.08 36% 1.00 28 1.00 13% 0.22 1.00 0.48 5.17 3.10 8.27 S_Q_04 1795 1.04 0.10 32% 1.00 29 1.00 13% 0.22 1.00 0.48 5.17 3.12 8.29 S_Q_05 2509 1.45 0.30 15% 0.71 16 1.00 9% 0.83 0.70 0.33 5.02 4.36 9.37 S_Q_06 2611 1.51 0.34 22% 1.00 35 0.85 9% 0.83 1.10 0.52 5.89 4.53 10.42 S_Q_07 1751 1.01 0.08 44% 1.00 24 1.00 16% 0.08 0.80 0.38 4.85 3.04 7.89 S_Q_08 2509 1.45 0.30 15% 0.71 16 1.00 9% 0.83 0.70 0.33 5.02 4.36 9.37 Average: 2062 1.19 0.17 30% 0.93 23 0.98 12% 0.47 0.88 0.42 5.21 3.58 8.79 S_QD_01 3043 1.76 0.52 19% 0.95 30 1.00 13% 0.22 0.80 0.38 3.50 8.80 12.31 S_QD_02 2899 1.68 0.46 20% 1.00 25 1.00 11% 0.52 0.90 0.43 3.95 8.39 12.34 S_QD_03 2275 1.32 0.22 26% 1.00 31 0.97 15% 0.08 1.00 0.48 3.53 6.58 10.11 S_QD_04 2899 1.68 0.46 20% 1.00 27 1.00 10% 0.67 0.90 0.43 4.10 8.39 12.49 S_QD_05 3146 1.82 0.56 25% 1.00 37 0.79 11% 0.52 1.10 0.52 3.83 9.10 12.94 S_QD_06 2323 1.34 0.24 25% 1.00 29 1.00 11% 0.52 0.90 0.43 3.95 6.72 10.67 S_QD_07 2899 1.68 0.46 10% 0.24 27 1.00 10% 0.67 0.90 0.43 2.58 8.39 10.97 S_QD_08 2611 1.51 0.34 22% 1.00 36 0.82 9% 0.83 1.10 0.52 4.17 7.55 11.73 Average: 2762 1.60 0.41 21% 0.90 30 0.95 11% 0.50 0.95 0.45 3.70 7.99 11.69 S_D_01 3578 2.07 0.69 21% 1.00 48 0.46 10% 0.67 1.30 0.62 2.25 14.49 16.74 S_D_02 3043 1.76 0.52 19% 0.95 21 1.00 10% 0.67 1.00 0.48 2.43 12.33 14.75 S_D_03 2899 1.68 0.46 20% 1.00 28 1.00 10% 0.67 1.20 0.57 2.54 11.74 14.29 S_D_04 3434 1.99 0.65 23% 1.00 42 0.64 12% 0.37 1.00 0.48 2.09 13.91 16.00 S_D_05 3578 2.07 0.69 22% 1.00 45 0.55 10% 0.67 0.90 0.43 2.19 14.49 16.68 S_D_06 3146 1.82 0.56 25% 1.00 45 0.55 13% 0.22 1.30 0.62 2.03 12.74 14.78 S_D_07 3578 2.07 0.69 22% 1.00 27 1.00 10% 0.67 1.10 0.52 2.52 14.49 17.01 S_D_08 3146 1.82 0.56 25% 1.00 42 0.64 10% 0.67 1.10 0.52 2.30 12.74 15.04 Average: 3300 1.91 0.60 22% 0.99 37 0.73 11% 0.58 1.11 0.53 2.29 13.37 15.66 Quality Density Q D 50% 80% 20% 50% 20% 80% Q Q Q D D D 50% 80% 20% 50% 20% 80% Q Q Q D D D S_Q_01 S_QD_01 S_QD_05 S_Q_02 S_Q_06 S_QD_06 S_Q_04 S_QD_08 S_D_02 S_D_06 S_D_07 S_D_08 Quality Eliminated in Evaluation 2- Architectural Aspects Eliminated in Evaluation 1- Sky View Factor Typology 1 Typology 2 Typology 3 Density Q D Total Built Area (TBA) Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Open Space Ratio(OSR) Circulation Length (CL) South Facing Surface Ratio (SFR) Enclosure Value (EV) Sky View Factor (SVF) OSR FAR CL SFR EV Typology 1 Typology 2 Typology 3
Genotype Archive of Generated Block Catalogues

Cluster Footprint Generation Catalogue- Parameter Values

248 249 Appendix SynchroniCity 0.7 - 0.8 - 1 0.8 - 0.8 - 0.8 1 - 0.8 - 0.7 Average Area (m2) Average Area (m2) Average Area (m2) Standard Deviation Standard Deviation Standard Deviation Number of Spaces Number of Spaces Number of Spaces Porousity Ratio Porousity Ratio Porousity Ratio 41.2 44.0 40.0 30.7 39.0 35.3 34.6 31.5 26.6 35.1 31.9 22.9 35.9 49.4 27.5 35.8 36.5 32.0 39.2 43.0 27.0 49.6 47.7 28.2 37.5 36.1 29.0 24.6 32.6 40.6 97.0 130.5 108.3 126.5 97.0 108.6 97.2 112.4 111.5 108.1 35.8 51.3 56.6 66.6 69.3 77.3 103.7 86.9 75.3 62.8 101.1 107.4 118.5 70.8 93.2 96.1 81.2 80.1 85.9 102.4 6 5 7 6 6 4 5 4 5 7 7 7 7 8 8 4 6 6 5 4 8 8 6 9 8 7 8 11 9 8 4.4 3.0 4.8 2.3 4.3 1.3 2.5 0.9 1.1 4.3 3.6 1.8 4.3 8.1 3.6 1.3 3.4 2.7 2.7 2.2 3.5 8.0 5.5 4.7 6.0 4.4 4.0 5.1 5.7 6.6 0.7 - 0.8 - 1 0.8 - 0.8 - 0.8 1 - 0.8 - 0.7 Average Area (m2) Average Area (m2) Average Area (m2) Standard Deviation Standard Deviation Standard Deviation Number of Spaces Number of Spaces Number of Spaces Porousity Ratio Porousity Ratio Porousity Ratio 41.2 44.0 40.0 30.7 39.0 35.3 34.6 31.5 26.6 35.1 31.9 22.9 35.9 49.4 27.5 35.8 36.5 32.0 39.2 43.0 27.0 49.6 47.7 28.2 37.5 36.1 29.0 24.6 32.6 40.6 97.0 130.5 108.3 126.5 97.0 108.6 97.2 112.4 111.5 108.1 35.8 51.3 56.6 66.6 69.3 77.3 103.7 86.9 75.3 62.8 101.1 107.4 118.5 70.8 93.2 96.1 81.2 80.1 85.9 102.4 6 5 7 6 6 4 5 4 5 7 7 7 7 8 8 4 6 6 5 4 8 8 6 9 8 7 8 11 9 8 4.4 3.0 4.8 2.3 4.3 1.3 2.5 0.9 1.1 4.3 3.6 1.8 4.3 8.1 3.6 1.3 3.4 2.7 2.7 2.2 3.5 8.0 5.5 4.7 6.0 4.4 4.0 5.1 5.7 6.6

Cluster Generation Catalogue- Quality and Density Parameter Values

250 251 Appendix SynchroniCity C_Q_01 371 Wh/m2 C_QD_01 392 Wh/m C_Q_06 384 Wh/m C_QD_06 406 Wh/m C_Q_02 398 Wh/m C_QD_02 387 Wh/m2 C_Q_07 380 Wh/m C_QD_07 399 Wh/m2 C_Q_03 388 Wh/m C_QD_03 413 Wh/m2 C_Q_08 377 Wh/m2 C_QD_08 412 Wh/m C_Q_04 390 Wh/m C_QD_04 420 Wh/m C_Q_09 390 Wh/m C_QD_09 400 Wh/m C_Q_05 389 Wh/m C_QD_05 413 Wh/m2 C_Q_10 360 Wh/m C_QD_10 413 Wh/m 16% 6% 8% 8% 8% 9% 6% 9% 7% 11% 9% 10% 6% 5% 6% 5% 7% 6% 8% 7% Cluster 2 Cluster 2 Q Q D D Cluster 1 Cluster 1 Q Q

Cluster Generation Catalogue- Quality and Density Parameter Values

252 253 Appendix SynchroniCity 9% 5% 10% 7% 6% 6% 5% 8% 6% 7% C_D_01 403 Wh/m C_D_06 375 Wh/m C_D_02 410 Wh/m C_D_07 385 Wh/m C_D_03 410 Wh/m C_D_08 394 Wh/m2 C_D_04 385 Wh/m2 C_D_09 401 Wh/m C_D_05 408 Wh/m C_D_10 391 Wh/m2 Cluster 3 Cluster 3 D D FAR BEC ISR SAP EV Quality Score Density Score Final Score PSA (m2) TBA (m ) POP Value Score Value Score Value Score Value Score Value Score C_Q_01 892 25642 1282 1.21 0.11 4% 0.64 371 0.99 16% 0.49 0.45 1.00 3.76 0.55 4.31 C_Q_02 974 25064 1253 1.18 0.09 3% 0.73 398 0.71 6% 0.83 0.61 0.19 3.19 0.45 3.64 C_Q_03 1007 25774 1289 1.21 0.11 8% 0.28 388 0.85 8% 1.00 0.57 0.32 2.73 0.55 3.28 C_Q_04 925 25855 1293 1.22 0.11 0% 1.00 390 0.83 8% 1.00 0.50 0.64 4.47 0.55 5.02 C_Q_05 1100 25764 1288 1.21 0.11 0% 1.00 389 0.84 8% 1.00 0.41 1.00 4.84 0.55 5.39 C_Q_06 1049 24682 1234 1.16 0.08 4% 0.64 384 0.90 9% 0.95 0.52 0.53 3.66 0.40 4.06 C_Q_07 960 23750 1188 1.12 0.06 1% 0.91 380 0.93 6% 0.83 0.42 1.00 4.58 0.30 4.88 C_Q_08 1030 25894 1295 1.22 0.11 2% 0.82 377 0.96 9% 0.95 0.58 0.28 3.83 0.55 4.38 C_Q_09 1000 24268 1213 1.14 0.07 0% 1.00 390 0.83 7% 0.95 0.68 0.04 3.82 0.35 4.17 C_Q_10 1065 25951 1298 1.22 0.11 0% 1.00 360 1.00 12% 0.49 0.61 0.19 3.68 0.55 4.23 Average: 1000 25265 1263 1.19 0.10 2% 0.80 383 0.88 9% 0.85 0.53 0.52 3.86 0.48 4.34 C_QD_01 849 30338 1517 1.51 0.54 7% 0.37 392 0.8 9% 0.95 0.64 0.12 2.61 2.70 5.31 C_QD_02 1032 29985 1499 1.49 0.49 2% 0.82 387 0.87 10% 0.83 0.78 0.01 3.35 2.45 5.80 C_QD_03 865 30250 1513 1.50 0.53 4% 0.64 413 0.38 6% 0.83 0.51 0.61 3.10 2.65 5.75 C_QD_04 847 29855 1493 1.48 0.48 1% 0.91 420 0.38 5% 0.83 0.51 0.58 3.61 2.40 6.01 C_QD_05 862 29040 1452 1.44 0.38 5% 0.55 413 0.38 6% 0.83 0.50 0.62 2.93 1.90 4.83 C_QD_06 860 30425 1521 1.51 0.55 3% 0.73 406 0.52 5% 0.83 0.62 0.17 2.98 2.75 5.73 C_QD_07 887 30256 1513 1.50 0.53 8% 0.28 399 0.69 7% 0.95 0.62 0.15 2.35 2.65 5.00 C_QD_08 835 30400 1520 1.51 0.55 5% 0.55 412 0.38 6% 0.83 0.49 0.70 3.01 2.75 5.76 C_QD_09 888 30138 1507 1.50 0.51 3% 0.73 400 0.67 8% 1.00 0.55 0.41 3.54 2.55 6.09 C_QD_10 866 30017 1501 1.49 0.50 5% 0.55 413 0.38 7% 0.95 0.50 0.65 3.08 2.50 5.58 Average: 879 30071 1504 1.49 0.51 4% 0.61 406 0.55 7% 0.88 0.57 0.40 3.06 2.53 5.59 C_D_01 867 38352 1918 1.98 0.99 11% 0.10 403 0.60 8% 1.00 0.51 0.58 2.38 4.95 7.33 C_D_02 815 37082 1854 1.91 0.98 14% 0.10 410 0.38 7% 0.95 0.61 0.19 1.72 4.90 6.62 C_D_03 818 37144 1857 1.91 0.98 6% 0.46 410 0.38 10% 0.83 0.66 0.08 2.21 4.90 7.11 C_D_04 889 36851 1843 1.90 0.97 9% 0.19 385 0.89 11% 0.49 0.72 0.01 1.77 4.85 6.62 C_D_05 818 36977 1849 1.91 0.98 12% 0.10 408 0.46 6% 0.83 0.72 0.01 1.50 4.90 6.40 C_D_06 878 36599 1830 1.89 0.97 8% 0.28 375 0.97 10% 0.83 0.78 0.01 2.37 4.85 7.22 C_D_07 890 36851 1843 1.90 0.97 4% 0.64 385 0.89 11% 0.49 0.72 0.01 2.67 4.85 7.52 C_D_08 894 38099 1905 1.96 0.99 9% 0.19 394 0.77 9% 0.95 0.65 0.09 2.19 4.95 7.14 C_D_09 866 38352 1918 1.98 0.99 8% 0.28 401 0.65 8% 1.00 0.63 0.13 2.34 4.95 7.29 C_D_10 860 39062 1953 2.01 1.00 12% 0.10 391 0.82 9% 0.95 0.67 0.05 2.02 5.00 7.02 Average: 860 37537 1877 1.93 0.98 9% 0.16 396 0.68 9% 0.83 0.67 0.12 1.96 4.91 6.87 Quality Density Q D Eliminated in Evaluation - Ground Network Quality Density Q D BEC FAR ISR SAP EV Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Block Edge Condition(BEC) Incident Solar Radiation (ISR) Shaded Area Proportion (SAP) Enclosure Value (EV) Public Space Area (PSA) Total Built Area (TBA) Cluster 1 Cluster 3 Cluster 2 Q Q D D
Radiance Wh / m 450 430 410 390 370 350 330 310 290 270 250
254 255 Appendix SynchroniCity L_QD_01 SVF: 0.69 L_QD_05 SVF: 0.48 L_D_05 SVF: 0.38 L_Q_02 SVF: 0.53 L_QD_02 SVF: 0.65 L_Q_06 SVF: 0.72 L_D_06 SVF: 0.42 L_D_07 SVF: 0.42 L_Q_04 SVF: 0.61 L_Q_08 SVF: 0.60 L_QD_08 SVF: 0.70 L_D_08 SVF: 0.51 50% 50% Q D Large Plot- Typology 1 (Q) Large Plot- Typology 2 (QD) Large Plot- Typology 3 (D) 80% 20% Q D 20% 80% Q D L_D_01 SVF: 0.54 L_D_02 SVF: 0.48 L_D_03 SVF: 0.53 L_D_04 SVF: 0.50 Large Plot Evaluation Criteria 1 Generated Block Individuals Average Typology (Q) L_Q_01 L_Q_02 L_Q_03 L_Q_04 L_Q_05 L_Q_06 L_Q_07 L_Q_08 Sky View Factor 0.59 0.53 0.53 0.61 0.59 0.72 0.59 0.60 0.60 Typology 2 (QD) L_QD_01 L_QD_02 L_QD_03 L_QD_04 L_QD_05 L_QD_06 L_QD_07 L_QD_08 Sky View Factor 0.69 0.65 0.52 0.62 0.48 0.65 0.68 0.70 0.62 Typology 3 (D) L_D_01 L_D_02 L_D_03 L_D_04 L_D_05 L_D_06 L_D_07 L_D_08 Sky View Factor 0.54 0.48 0.53 0.50 0.38 0.42 0.42 0.51 0.47 Sky View Factor < 0.5 Elevated network Extension capacity Informal passway Interconnection capacity 1 2 3 4 Evaluation Criteria 2 Architectural Aspects L_Q_01 SVF: 0.59 1 4 L_Q_03 SVF: 0.53 3 4 L_QD_03 SVF: 0.52 2 3 4 L_QD_04 SVF: 0.62 2 4 Selected Individuals L_QD_06 SVF: 0.65 2 3 4 L_Q_05 SVF: 0.59 1 3 4 L_Q_07 SVF: 0.59 1 4 L_QD_07 SVF: 0.68 2 3 4 Selected Individuals Evaluation 1 Evaluation 2 L_D_01 L_D_01 Sky View Factor Architectural Aspects Evaluation : Block Level

Medium Plot- Typology 1 (Q)

256 257 Appendix SynchroniCity M_QD_05 SVF: 0.68 M_QD_02 SVF: 0.74 M_Q_06 SVF: 0.67 M_QD_03 SVF: 0.71 M_Q_07 SVF: 0.74 M_Q_04 SVF: 0.61 M_Q_08 SVF: 0.74 M_QD_08 SVF: 0.66 M_D_01 SVF: 0.45 M_D_02 SVF: 0.43 M_D_03 SVF: 0.43 M_D_04 SVF: 0.47 Medium Plot Evaluation Criteria 1 Generated Block Individuals Average Typology 1 (Q) M_Q_01 M_Q_02 M_Q_03 M_Q_04 M_Q_05 M_Q_06 M_Q_07 M_Q_08 Sky View Factor 0.76 0.63 0.72 0.61 0.63 0.67 0.74 0.74 0.69 Typology 2 (QD) M_QD_01 M_QD_02 M_QD_03 M_QD_04 M_QD_05 M_QD_06 M_QD_07 M_QD_08 Sky View Factor 0.64 0.74 0.71 0.63 0.68 0.74 0.67 0.66 0.68 Typology 3 (D) M_D_01 M_D_02 M_D_03 M_D_04 M_D_05 M_D_06 M_D_07 M_D_08 Sky View Factor 0.45 0.43 0.43 0.47 0.74 0.66 0.71 0.66 0.57
Plot- Typology 2 (QD) Medium Plot- Typology 3 (D) 50% 50% Q D 80% 20% Q D 20% 80% Q D Sky View Factor < 0.5 Elevated network Extension capacity Informal passway Interconnection capacity 1 2 3 4 Evaluation Criteria 2 Architectural Aspects Selected Individuals M_Q_01 SVF: 0.76 2 3 M_Q_02 SVF: 0.63 2 4 M_Q_03 SVF: 0.72 2 4 M_Q_05 SVF: 0.63 3 4 M_QD_04 SVF: 0.63 1 3 M_QD_06 SVF: 0.74 1 4 M_D_07 SVF: 0.71 3 4 M_D_08 SVF: 0.66 2 3 M_QD_01 SVF: 0.64 1 3 4 M_QD_07 SVF: 0.67 1 3 4 M_D_05 SVF: 0.74 2 3 4 M_D_06 SVF: 0.66 2 3 4 Evaluation 1 Evaluation 2 M_D_01 M_D_01 Sky View Factor Architectural Aspects Evaluation : Block Level
Medium

Small

258 259 Appendix SynchroniCity S_Q_05 SVF: 0.81 S_QD_02 SVF: 0.79 S_Q_03 SVF: 0.87 S_QD_03 SVF: 0.81 S_Q_07 SVF: 0.83 S_QD_07 SVF: 0.77 S_QD_04 SVF: 0.72 S_Q_08 SVF: 0.81 S_D_01 SVF: 0.84 S_D_05 SVF: 0.86 S_D_03 SVF: 0.75 S_D_04 SVF: 0.80 Small Plot Evaluation Criteria 1 Generated Block Individuals Average Typology 1 (Q) S_Q_01 S_Q_02 S_Q_03 S_Q_04 S_Q_05 S_Q_06 S_Q_07 S_Q_08 Sky View Factor 0.83 0.82 0.87 0.79 0.81 0.62 0.83 0.81 0.80 Typology 2 (QD) S_QD_01 S_QD_02 S_QD_03 S_QD_04 S_QD_05 S_QD_06 S_QD_07 S_QD_08 Sky View Factor 0.73 0.79 0.81 0.72 0.85 0.81 0.77 0.63 0.76 Typology 3 (D) S_D_01 S_D_02 S_D_03 S_D_04 S_D_05 S_D_06 S_D_07 S_D_08 Sky View Factor 0.84 0.71 0.75 0.80 0.86 0.76 0.80 0.84 0.80 Sky View Factor < 0.5
Plot- Typology 2 (QD)
Plot- Typology 3 (D) 50% 50% Q D 80% 20% Q D 20% 80% Q D Elevated network Extension capacity Informal passway Interconnection capacity 1 2 3 4 Evaluation Criteria 2 Architectural Aspects Selected Individuals S_Q_02 SVF: 0.82 1 4 S_QD_01 SVF: 0.73 1 3 S_QD_05 SVF: 0.85 1 4 S_QD_08 SVF: 0.63 1 4 S_D_06 SVF: 0.76 1 4 S_D_02 SVF: 0.71 1 4 S_D_08 SVF: 0.84 1 4 S_D_07 SVF: 0.80 1 4 S_QD_06 SVF: 0.81 1 3 4 S_Q_04 SVF: 0.79 1 3 S_Q_06 SVF: 0.62 1 3 4 S_Q_01 SVF: 0.83 1 3 4 Selected Individuals Evaluation 1 Evaluation 2 S_D_01 S_D_01 Sky View Factor Architectural Aspects Evaluation : Block Level
Plot- Typology 1 (Q) Small
Small

Cluster 1 Evaluation

Cluster 1 individuals were generated to accommodate more number high quality blocks (typology 1). Overall, it was observed that the individuals consisted of higher porosity at the ground level. This also meant that the individuals contained many informal passageways that could provide the cluster with high connectivity. Thus, it would help to create more opportunities for social interaction within the cluster. Four best individuals out of ten were selected to form the cluster 1 design catalogue.

260 261 Appendix SynchroniCity C_Q_01 C_Q_06 C_Q_02 C_Q_07 C_Q_03 C_Q_08 C_Q_04 C_Q_09 C_Q_05 C_Q_10 Cluster 1 Q Public Space Area (m2) Population FAR Incident Solar Radiation (Wh/m ) Enclosure Value Shaded Area C_Q_01 892 1282 1.21 371 0.45 16% C_Q_02 974 1253 1.18 398 0.61 6% C_Q_03 1007 1289 1.21 388 0.57 8% C_Q_04 925 1293 1.22 390 0.50 8% C_Q_05 1100 1288 1.21 389 0.41 8% C_Q_06 1049 1234 1.16 384 0.52 9% C_Q_07 960 1188 1.12 380 0.42 6% C_Q_08 1030 1295 1.22 377 0.58 9% C_Q_09 1000 1213 1.14 390 0.68 7% C_Q_10 1065 1298 1.22 360 0.61 12% Average: 1000 1263 1.19 383 0.53 9% Q Q D D Typology 1 Large Block Medium Block 15 Blocks Small Block Typology 2 Typology 3 x 5 x 5 x 5 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 2 Block Design Catalogue Centralised network pattern Continuous ring streets 1 2 Plot Area: 20148 m
Evaluation : Cluster Level

Evaluation : Cluster Level

Cluster 2 Evaluation

The Cluster 2 individuals were generated with equal weighting on quality and density. They have showed less porosity and connectivity as compared to cluster 1, which had higher weighting on quality. This was because the majority of the blocks (typology 2) chosen for aggregation had equal weighting on quality and density. These clusters could provide a higher density within them while maintaining the spatial quality. As they consisted of fewer passageways, the public spaces were well integrated and connected within the clusters.

262 263 Appendix SynchroniCity Cluster 2 Q D C_QD_01 C_QD_06 C_QD_02 C_QD_07 C_QD_03 C_QD_08 C_QD_04 C_QD_09 C_QD_05 C_QD_10 Public Space Area (m2 Population FAR Incident Solar Radiation (Wh/m ) Enclosure Value Shaded Area C_QD_01 849 1517 1.51 392 0.64 9% C_QD_02 1032 1499 1.49 387 0.78 10% C_QD_03 865 1513 1.50 413 0.51 6% C_QD_04 847 1493 1.48 420 0.51 5% C_QD_05 862 1452 1.44 413 0.50 6% C_QD_06 860 1521 1.51 406 0.62 5% C_QD_07 887 1513 1.50 399 0.62 7% C_QD_08 835 1520 1.51 412 0.49 6% C_QD_09 888 1507 1.50 400 0.55 8% C_QD_10 866 1501 1.49 413 0.50 7% Average: 879 1504 1.49 406 0.57 7% Q Q D D Typology 1 Large Block Medium Block 15 Blocks Small Block Typology 2 Typology 3 x 5 x 5 x 5 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 Block Design Catalogue Centralised network pattern Continuous ring streets 1 2 Plot Area: 20148 m

Cluster 3 Evaluation

Cluster 3 individuals were generated with the aim to form a high density cluster. These clusters have achieved the highest FAR values of 2.01 while still maintain a high spatial quality as they consisted of the least amount of porosity and connectivity. While they were able to achieve some large open spaces at the ground level, the informal passageways within the blocks were at a minimum.

264 265 Appendix SynchroniCity Cluster 3 D C_D_01 C_D_06 C_D_02 C_D_07 C_D_03 C_D_08 C_D_04 C_D_09 C_D_05 C_D_10 Plot Area: 19401 m Public Space Area (m ) Population FAR Incident Solar Radiation (Wh/m ) Enclosure Value Shaded Area C_D_01 867 1918 1.98 403 0.51 8% C_D_02 815 1854 1.91 410 0.61 7% C_D_03 818 1857 1.91 410 0.66 10% C_D_04 889 1843 1.90 385 0.72 11% C_D_05 818 1849 1.91 408 0.72 6% C_D_06 878 1830 1.89 375 0.78 10% C_D_07 890 1843 1.90 385 0.72 11% C_D_08 894 1905 1.96 394 0.65 9% C_D_09 866 1918 1.98 401 0.63 8% C_D_10 860 1953 2.01 391 0.67 9% Average: 860 1877 1.93 396 0.67 9% Q Q D D Typology 1 Large Block Medium Block 15 Blocks Small Block Typology 2 Typology 3 x 5 x 5 x 5 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 Block Design Catalogue Centralised network pattern Continuous ring streets 1 2
Evaluation : Cluster Level
266 SynchroniCity Enclosure Value
Sky View Factor
Genetic Algorithm Scripts for Parameters
South Facing Surface Circulation Length
268 269 Appendix SynchroniCity
Network Generation from osm format Maps Network Offset for Space Syntax Analysis Building Archive for Generated Geometry Catalogue
Aggregation Logics
Genetic Algorithm Scripts for Geometry Aggregation
Geometry

Genetic Algorithm Scripts for Spatial Configuration Evaluation

Spatial Network Analysis (Copyright (C) 2000-2010 University College London, Alasdair Turner)

Visual Controllability Analysis Source Code avalaible from: https://github.com/SpaceGroupUCL/Depthmap/blob/master/src/depthmap/AgentAnalysisDlg.cpp#L1

// AgentAnalysisDlg.cpp implementation file //

#include “stdafx.h”

#include “depthmap.h”

#include “AgentAnalysisDlg.h”

#ifdef _DEBUG

#define new DEBUG_NEW

#undef THIS_FILE

static char THIS_FILE[] = __FILE__;

#endif

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

// CAgentAnalysisDlg dialog

CAgentAnalysisDlg::CAgentAnalysisDlg(CWnd* pParent /*=NULL*/)

CDialog(CAgentAnalysisDlg::IDD, pParent)

//{{AFX_DATA_INIT(CAgentAnalysisDlg)

m_release_location = -1;

m_fov = 0;

m_frames = 0;

m_release_rate = 0.0;

m_steps = 0;

m_timesteps = 0;

m_occlusion = -1;

m_record_trails = FALSE;

m_trail_count = 0;

//}}AFX_DATA_INIT

m_trail_count = 50;

m_occlusion = 0;

m_gatelayer = -1;

m_release_location = 0;

void CAgentAnalysisDlg::DoDataExchange(CDataExchange* pDX)

CDialog::DoDataExchange(pDX);

//{{AFX_DATA_MAP(CAgentAnalysisDlg)

DDX_Control(pDX, IDC_LAYER_SELECTOR, m_layer_selector);

DDX_Radio(pDX, IDC_RELEASE_LOCATION, m_release_location);

DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_FOV, m_fov);

DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_FRAMES, m_frames);

DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_RELEASE_RATE, m_release_rate);

DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_STEPS, m_steps);

DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_TIMESTEPS, m_timesteps);

DDX_CBIndex(pDX, IDC_OCCLUSION, m_occlusion);

DDX_Check(pDX, IDC_RECORD_TRAILS, m_record_trails);

DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_TRAIL_COUNT, m_trail_count);

DDV_MinMaxInt(pDX, m_trail_count, 1, 50); //}}AFX_DATA_MAP

BEGIN_MESSAGE_MAP(CAgentAnalysisDlg, CDialog)

//{{AFX_MSG_MAP(CAgentAnalysisDlg)

//}}AFX_MSG_MAP

END_MESSAGE_MAP()

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

// CAgentAnalysisDlg message handlers

BOOL CAgentAnalysisDlg::OnInitDialog()

CDialog::OnInitDialog();

for (size_t i = 0; i < m_names.size(); i++) {

}

m_layer_selector.AddString( CString(m_names[i].c_str()) );

m_layer_selector.SetCurSel(m_gatelayer + 1);

return TRUE; // return TRUE unless you set the focus to a control

// EXCEPTION: OCX Property Pages should return FALSE

void CAgentAnalysisDlg::OnOK()

m_gatelayer = m_layer_selector.GetCurSel() - 1;

CDialog::OnOK();

270 271 Appendix SynchroniCity
272 273 Bibliography SynchroniCity BIBLIOGRAPHY

http://www.buildinghappiness.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/shenzen-china-urban-growth1.jpg

https://lh3.ggpht.com/g2orGFGiS5-ID1Dxbr1xuX6htgKE2w0FFNERcQONCWyHTKiG6JyNqtcEno_oQxciRkSR=s136

https://lh4.ggpht.com/nxqu8LY1sswkt7nl0jAPKZKPfgxbOlcXlA3Ot-gnA6z86NYlithQh7K0Qjk5-olMvX1bZiw=s114

https://lh5.ggpht.com/DNDCF6T6J1xgSaEJW4sByPf8cipOMVfUiHYEwJT3NXOpRY1WTsw2O0zqY2V_y_z3bEmKUQ=s151

http://traditions.cultural-china.com/chinaWH/upload/upfiles/2010-08/11/the_five_elements_of_chinese_culture512e89eb9cfcc925dee5.jpg

http://www.thechinaguide.com/hutong_tour1/Hutong_Beijing_01.jpg copyright c peter danford

http://www.soci.org/Chemistry-and-Industry/CnI-Data/2011/18/~/media/Images/CnI/Issue%20Image/2011/18/indiancity.ashx?w=200&h=126&as=1

http://res.cloudinary.com/hrscywv4p/image/upload/c_limit,h_1200,w_2000/ur5ywfcxts3enbp8knov.jpg

http://www.bloomberg.com/image/iab3fbjaJ_n8.jpg

http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2007-03/28/xinsrc_1820304280734812317435.jpg

http://esa.un.org/unup/Maps/maps_urban_1960.htm

http://esa.un.org/unup/Maps/maps_urban_1980.htm

http://esa.un.org/unup/Maps/maps_urban_2011.htm

http://esa.un.org/unup/Maps/maps_urban_2025.htm

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_bxhgp6OZooM/TEqP7oa_V6I/AAAAAAAABWk/EVVnjbjLCGI/s1600/Screen+shot+2010-07-24+at+12.55.59+AM.png

http://mytomnet.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/8710_24_y.jpg

http://img5.pcpop.com/ArticleImages/picshow/900x675/20130721/2013072121010199462.jpg

http://info.aia.org/aiarchitect/2010/multimedia/articles/1119_SiheyuanHutong/pic2.jpg

http://images.asc.ohio-state.edu/is/image/ha/0061231_c.JPG?size=668,668&qlt=30&fmt=jpeg

http://identityhousing.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/tiss2.png

http://identityhousing.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/tiss1.png

http://images.china.cn/site1006/20070806/00105cadc1c5082100c407.jpg

http://www.cultural-china.com/chinaWH/images/exbig_images/705f3c42c64b1f505a15689c29b3f55c.jpg

http://www.ashgatepublishing.com/isbn/9781409405030

http://arquiproyecto.com.ec/imagenes/big/su-12.jpg

http://identityhousing.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/giu-6.png

http://identityhousing.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/giulianelli2.png

http://dome.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.3/58436/150032_sv.jpg?sequence=2

http://identityhousing.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/giu-1.png

http://picpost.postjung.com/data/173/173328-pic-5.jpg

http://static.dezeen.com/uploads/2009/07/mahanakhon-by-oma-88.gif

http://ad009cdnb.archdaily.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/1323468859-mvrdv-yongsan-birdeye.jpg

http://architecture.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/cloud9.jpg

http://www10.aeccafe.com/blogs/arch-showcase/files/2011/12/Sky-Village-facade_copyright-ADEPT-MVRDV.jpg

http://lh5.ggpht.com/_QzdUvyDN87g/SRD2Im8yn6I/AAAAAAAABiU/k790gBMNy4o/s800/SkyVillage.gif

http://blogs.voanews.com/china-wangre/2011/12/06/falling-property-prices-create-net-buzz/

http://theperfectslum.blogspot.co.uk/

http://www.skyscrapercity.comshowthread.phpt=755418

http://www.freeimageslive.co.uk/free_stock_image/beijingconstructionjpg

http://www.thenewmans.id.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/beijing-019.jpg

http://cfs11.tistory.com/image/18/tistory/2009/01/23/15/23/4979626160358

http://pr2012.aaschool.ac.uk/students/Metabolism_and_Culture

http://pr2013.aaschool.ac.uk/EMERGENT-TECHNOLOGIES/Autonomous-Infrastructures

http://www.saf.co.il/noa/new_4806

http://pr2012.aaschool.ac.uk/students/Metabolism_and_Culture

http://pr2013.aaschool.ac.uk/EMERGENT-TECHNOLOGIES/Autonomous-Infrastructures

http://nexus.umn.edu/Reviews/Marshall.pdf

http://nexus.umn.edu/Reviews/Marshall.pdf

http://www.db-rep.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Ecotect-ShadowRanges-666x500.png

http://www.grasshopper3d.com/forum/topics/geco-responsive-surface-openings

http://bio.illinoisstate.edu/kaedwar/images/HawaiianDrosImages/HawaiiFig2.jpg

https://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en&tab=wl

https://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en&tab=wl

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_bxhgp6OZooM/TEqddUc42fI/AAAAAAAABYs/S8BV0id0lp4/s1600/agna+square-02.jpg

http://www.flickr.com/photos/70876789@N00/170055978

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_bxhgp6OZooM/TEqdQCjrwzI/AAAAAAAABX0/hMvBcdABCas/s1600/Ranwar+Square-01+copy.jpg

https://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en&tab=wl

http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3651/3375075152_39d43076e8_o.jpg

http://pic4.nipic.com/20090720/895017_140154004_2.jpg

Image Links

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beijing

http://www.fotopedia.com/wiki/Maharashtra#!/items/flickr-2228329938

http://pmzp.findart.com.cn/1596057.html

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c8/CIDCO_Aerial-_Canought_Place.jpg

http://static.manoramaonline.com/ranked/online/MM/The_Week/CouragetoGoBeyond/24-Aerial.jpg

http://realestateindia.anandmahal.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/affordable-housing.jpg

http://www.census2011.co.in/census/district/355-thane.html

http://www.census2011.co.in/census/metropolitan/305-mumbai.html

http://thanecity.gov.in/news_detail.php?id=4

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/ca/India_location_map_3.png/375px-India_location_map_3.png

http://somemarkets.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/frei-otto-optimized-path-system.jpg

http://bbs.godeyes.cn/upload/2007/04/24/191814.jpg

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m8cezjSS8P1qa46j9o1_500.jpg

http://i1.ytimg.com/vi/EB9inujCuKc/hqdefault.jpg?feature=og

http://postimg.org/image/ay2vd3r47/

http://postimg.org/image/db87skarr/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/70876789@N00/170055978

http://inapcache.boston.com/universal/site_graphics/blogs/bigpicture/hawkes_04_29/h08_00000015.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/ca/India_location_map_3.png/375px-India_location_map_3.png

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_bxhgp6OZooM/TEqdfc6PXvI/AAAAAAAABY0/2lHA416NL7A/s1600/Ranwar+aerial-04.jpg

http://inapcache.boston.com/universal/site_graphics/blogs/bigpicture/hawkes_04_29/h08_00000015.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/ca/India_location_map_3.png/375px-India_location_map_3.png

http://postimg.org/image/4vy1c871d/

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_bxhgp6OZooM/TEqdMnQHICI/AAAAAAAABXk/GaOdZzOTZs0/s1600/Ranwar+Square-06.jpg

http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/originals/da/c1/e9/dac1e99d7221a7c6253bbc029b3483b1.jpg

http://www.globespots.com/pictures/middleeast/iran/593377033_d057899a62_b.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/33/Hampi_aug09_243.jpg

http://infranetlab.org/drupal7/sites/default/files/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/09_07_18_stepwells03.jpg

http://www.designboom.com/architecture/venice-architecture-biennale-08-rebirth-brick-in-the-chinese-pavilion/ http://www.gooood.hk/_d275610375.htm

Reading References

Courtyard Housing and Cultural Sustainability, Donia Zhang, Oxford Brookes University, UK, May 2013.

Life Between Buildings. Jan Gehl, Arkitektens Forlag, 1987.

Street Patterns, Stephen Marshall, Spon Press, 2005

The Image of The City, Kevin Lynch, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1960

Metabolism And Culture, Fatermeh Nasseri and Yasaman Mousavi, Architectural Association, 2012

Urban Change: Complexity and Emergence, Cities and Complexity, Michael Batty, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2007

The Architecture of Emergence, Michael Weinstock, John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 2010

AD- System City, Michael Weinstock, John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 2013

The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Jane Jacobs, Vintage Books, 1993

The Architecture of Complexity, Herbert A. Simon, Carnegie Institute of Technology, 1962

Housing & urbanisation , Charles Correa Thames & Hudson Ltd 1999

Raj Rewal, Brian Brace Taylor , Mimar, 1991

Charles Correa Charles Correa and Kenneth Frampton , Thames & Hudson Ltd, 1996

Machiya and Transition , John Linam 1999

A Study on the Eastern Waterfront of Mumbai Rahul Mehrotra, Pankaj Joshi, Anirudh Paul Urban Design Research Institute 2005

274 275 Bibliography SynchroniCity Page Page Link Link Nnumber Nnumber 13 14 15 16 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 29 30 31 32 33 41 47 48 56 58 159 160 161 163 164 165 178 181 185 194 198 202 208 233 235 Fig 1.2 Fig 1.3 Fig 1.4 Fig 1.5 Fig 1.6 Fig 2.1.1 Fig 2.1.3 Fig 2.1.4 Fig 2.1.5 Fig 2.2.1 Fig 2.2.2 Fig 2.2.3 Fig 2.2.4 Fig 2.2.5 Fig 2.2.6 Fig 2.2.7 Fig 2.2.8 Fig 2.2.9 Fig 2.2.10 Fig 2.2.11 Fig 2.3.1 Fig 2.3.2 Fig 2.3.3 Fig 2.3.4 Fig 2.3.5 Fig 2.3.6 Fig 2.4.1 Fig 2.4.2 Fig 2.4.3 Fig 2.4.4 Fig 2.4.5 Fig 2.5.1 Fig 2.5.2 Fig 2.5.3 Fig 2.5.4 Fig 2.5.5 Fig 2.5.6 Fig 3.2.5 Fig 3.2.6 Fig 3.3.2 Fig 3.3.3 Fig 7.2.2 Fig 7.2.3 Fig 7.2.4 Fig 7.2.5 Fig 7.2.7
7.2.8
7.2.10
7.2.12
7.2.13
7.2.14
7.2.15 Fig 7.4.2 Fig 7.4.6 Fig 7.4.14
7.5.6 Fig 7.5.14
7.6.1 Fig 7.6.2 Fig 7.6.15
7.6.16
8.2.1 Fig 8.2.2
8.2.3
8.2.4
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Fig
Image Links

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.