AN ASSESSMENT OF THE ADOPTION OF IMPROVED TECHNOLOGIES AMONGST ATASP-1 BENEFICIARIES IN NIGERIA

Page 64

5.2.10 Rate of Adoption of technologies disseminated to sorghum farmers There were considerable high levels of adoption of technologies disseminated to sorghum farmersunder ATASP-1 project as shown in table 25. From the table, cultivation of improved seed recorded100% level of adoption while plant population was at about 93% level of adoption. On the other hand, fertilizer application with micro dosing of organic with inorganic fertilizer recorded about 99% level of adoption while minimum tillage recorded 60% level of adoption. The only technology with the very low level of adoption at about 38% is mechanization. There is therefore the need to intensify effort on this as well as provide incentives that will encourage the uptake of this particular technology to enable farmers engage in large scale production which can only be possible under mechanized farming. Also, a graphical presentation of technologies disseminated to sorghum farmers are as presented in figure 6. From this figure, except mechanization where the rate of adoption was about 38%, all other technologies have an impressive scores ranging from 60% to 100%. It is an indication that farmers have embraced these technologies and this is expected to lead to substantial increase in output in sorghum production. Table 25: Rate of adoption of sorghum technologies S/No 1 2 3 4 5

Technologies Improved variety Plant population 0.75 x 0.3m 2 plants per hill Tillage: minimum Tillage (use of herbicides) Fertilizer application: Micro dosing of organic and inorganic fertilizer Mechanization * Multiple responses were allowed

Frequency* 80 74 48 79 30

Percentage 100 92.5 60 98.75 37.5

Figure 6: Bar chart showing rate of technology adoption by sorghum farmers (the serial number corresponds with the number on table 25)

50


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Annexure 6: Interview with a female farmers @ TunganKawo, Wushishi

0
pages 105-106

Annexure 5: Acassava crusher @ Tsadozhiko, Wushishi

0
page 104

Annexure 4: Interview with a farmer @ TungaKawo, Wushishi

0
page 103

Table 29: Effects of ATASP-1 on fabricators outputs

1min
page 69

Table 36c: Constraints militating against the adoption of Good Agronomic Practices among rice farmers

5min
pages 84-87

Table 32: Effects of ATASP-1 on processors income Table 33: Analyses of factors influencing adoption of disseminated technologies

9min
pages 71-74

Practices cassava farmers

1min
page 82

Table 36b: Constraints militating against the adoption of Good Agronomic Practices among sorghum farmers

1min
page 83

Table 28: Effect of GAP on farmers' income

1min
page 68

Table 26: Rate of adoption of rice technologies

3min
pages 65-66

Table 14: Membership of Associations by farmers

2min
pages 45-46

Table 23: Reasons for farmers' adoption of Good Agronomic Practices (GAP

2min
page 62

Table 25: Rate of adoption of sorghum technologies

1min
page 64

Table 15: Access to agricultural training among rice farmers

1min
pages 47-48

Table 16: Input used in crop production

1min
pages 49-50

Table 27: Effect of GAP on cassava, sorghum and rice production

1min
page 67

Table 12: Distribution of farmers by extension contact and membership of association

2min
pages 42-43

Table 9: Land area devoted to the cultivation of each crop

2min
page 39

1 Background of contributions to the ATASP-1 Program Development Objectives

2min
page 17

Table 4: Educational qualification of the household head

1min
page 36

1.3 Purpose of the Study

2min
page 18

1.6 Limitations of the Study

0
page 20

1.1 Introduction

2min
page 15

Table: 10 Year of experience in farming by farmers

1min
page 40

Table 1: Structure of farmer's household across crops in the ATASP-1 Project

2min
page 34
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.